Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Kellogg Consulting Club z How much would you pay me TODAY for this offer?
Finance Primer
$10/year
Payment Today
($)
$ Today or $ Tomorrow
1
DCF - An Example DCF: The Main Insight
z Consider 2 Strategies for Daimler-Chrysler z The main insight is that one dollar today is worth
1. Produce cheap cars in early years generating large profits more than one dollar tomorrow
today at the expense of low profits in the future
z Future Value is defined to be the future value, as of z Present Value is the value today of a future cashflow
next year, of $PV today: z Previous example: What is the PV of $1.06 received
in one year?
FV = (1 + r ) PV = PV + rPV
FV = (1 + r ) PV
where r is the interest rate and PV is the Present Value or initial
investment FV
PV =
(1 + r )
$1.06
=
(1 + .06)
= $1
Pulvino 2003 11 Pulvino 2003 12
2
Present Value Comparison of FV and PV
z Alternative question: How much would I have to Plan Present Value Future Value
deposit in the bank today in order to have $1 one
year from today (assume r = 6%)? A $1.00 $1.06
FV = (1 + r ) PV B $0.9434 $1.00
FV
PV =
(1 + r )
Note: By either criterion (PV or FV) we prefer A to B
$1.00
=
(1 + .06) Present Values and Future Values put cashflows
= $0.9434 that come at different times on a comparable basis
3
Extension to Multiple Years Extension to Multiple Years
z Suppose that the interest rate is 6%. What is the future z Suppose that the interest rate is 6%. What is the present
value of $1 20 years from today? value of $1000 received 15 years from today?
FV
FV = (1 + r ) n PV PV =
(1 + r ) n
In this example, PV=$1, n=20, r=6% In this example, FV=$1000, n=15, r=6%
1000
Therefore, FV = $1*(1+.06)20 = $3.21 Therefore, PV = = $417.27
(1 + .06)15
Example Example
z Suppose the interest rate is 12% and you are offered z Solution: Put the two investments on a comparable
the following two options. Which option do you basiscalculate the present values
prefer? 500
A. Receive $500 2 years from today PVA = = $398.60
B. Receive $750 6 years from today (1 + .12) 2
750
PVB = = $379.97
(1 + .12)6
z Even though the nominal payoff from Plan B is
greater, it is worth less because it is obtained further
in the future. This is the Time Value of Money
Pulvino 2003 23 Pulvino 2003 24
4
Future and Present Value Addition Example: Present Value Addition
z Suppose that you want to find the FV or the PV of a z Assume an interest rate of 8% and calculate the PV
number of different cashflows that occur at different of the following cashflows
times $85
$100
1 2
-$150
85 100
z The present value of a stream of cashflows is equal PV = 150 + +
to the sum of the present values of the individual (1 + .08)1 (1 + .08)2
cashflows = 150 + 78.70 + 85.73 = $14.43
Pulvino 2003 25 Pulvino 2003 26
z Assume an interest rate of 8% and calculate the FV z What is the PV at time 0 of $16.84 in two years?
of the following cashflows as of the end of year 2
$100
$85
16.84
PV = = $14.43
1 2
(1 + .08) 2
-$150
z The NPV of a project is the present value of future z The internal rate of return (IRR) is the discount rate
cashflows net of the initial investment that makes the NPV of a stream of cashflows equal
to zero
z If the NPV is positive, the project creates shareholder z Stated differently, IRR is the discount rate which
value and should be accepted causes the value of future cashflows to equal the
initial investment
z If NPV is negative, the project destroys shareholder z For a given set of future cashflows C0, C1, C2,,Cn,
value and should be rejected and initial investment P, IRR is the rate r that
solves:
C1 C2 Cn
P = C0 + + + ... +
(1 + r ) (1 + r )2 (1 + r ) n
Pulvino 2003 29 Pulvino 2003 30
5
Example: IRR Perpetuities
z Find the IRR for a project with the following cash z A special case of multiple cash flows: a perpetuity is
flows, an initial investment of $150, and future a constant cashflow stream that lasts forever
cashflows of:
C1 = $85
C2 = $100
85 100
0 = 150 + +
(1 + r ) (1 + r ) 2 z The present value of a perpetuity is equal to:
IRR =14.76% C
PVt = =C
t +1
(1+r )t r
z Assume an interest rate of 10%. What is the present z An annuity is like a perpetuity except that the
value of a $150 perpetuity? cashflows occur over a finite (not infinite) period of
time
z The present value of an annuity can be calculated:
150
PV = = $1500 Using the annuity formula
.10 Using the perpetuity formula + the present value formula
Using Excel
z Annuity Formula:
1
PV = C 1
r (1+ r )n
understanding of PV addition)
B
MINUS
A EQUALS
C
MINUS C 1 C
PVA =
C
r (1 + r ) n r
C 1
= 1
z PVA = PVB - PVC r (1 + r ) n
Pulvino 2003 35 Pulvino 2003 36
6
Annuities (continued) Example #1: Annuities
z Therefore, the present value of an annuity is equal to z How much do you need to deposit in the bank today
the annuity multiplied by the annuity factor: in order to guarantee yourself payments of $5000 per
year for the next 25 years, starting at the end of this
year. Assume r = 7.5%.
1 1 1 To answer this question, you need to calculate the present
r (1+ r )n value of the annuity
PMT = $5000, n=25, r=7.5%
5000 1
PV = 1 (1 + .075) 25
.075
= $55,734.73
PMT 1
20,000 = 1 (1 + .10)5
.10
PMT = $5,275.95
z The PV of a perpetuity approximates the PV of a z Suppose you want to calculate the present value of a
long-lived annuity. To see that this is true, calculate growing perpetuity where the cash flow grows at a
the PV for the following two alternatives, assuming constant rate forever
3
C(1+g)
100 1
PVA = 1 (1 + .10)30 = $942.69
PV
7
Example: Growing Perpetuity Pop Quiz #1
z What is the present value of a project that has a z Suppose that today is your 30th birthday. You will be
cashflow of $100 next year, $105 the following year, able to save for the next 25 years, until age 55. For
$110.25 the following year, 10 years thereafter, your income will just cover your
(assume r = 8%) expenses. Finally, you expect to retire at age 65 and
live until age 80. If you want to guarantee yourself
$100,000 per year starting on your 66th birthday, how
z This is a growing perpetuity with a growth rate equal much should you save each year for the next 25
to 5% 100
PV = = $3,333.33 years, starting at the end of this year. Assume that
(.08 .05) your investments are expected to yield 12%
Pop Quiz #1: Solution, Step 1 Pop Quiz #1: Solution, Step 2
z General Approach: Work backwards z How much will you need to have saved by age 55 in
$100k order to have $681,086.45 by age 65? The answer is
the PV of PV65 for 10 years.
66 67 80 681,086.45
PV55 = = $219,291.61
(1 + .12)10
PV
$100k 1
PV65 = 1 (1 + .12)15 = $681,086.45
.12
Pulvino 2003 45 Pulvino 2003 46
z Finally, how much will you need to save for the next
25 years so that you have $219,291.61 at age 55? It is the greatest mathematical
The answer is an annuity with a future value of discovery of all time.
$219,291.61 and a present value of $12,899.46
(PV = $219,291.61/(1.12)25)
Who said it?
What was he/she referring to?
PMT 1
12,899.46 = 1 (1 + .12) 25
.12
PMT = $1,644.68
Pulvino 2003 47 Pulvino 2003 48
8
Compounding Periods
z Monthly Compounding: $1 invested at an annual rate z The interest rate r that is compounded is known as
of 8% compounded monthly yields at the end of one the Annual Percentage Rate (APR)
year:
r .08 z The Effective Annual Rate from a given APR will
FV = (1 + ) n PV = (1+ )12 x $1= $1.0830 depend on the number of compounding periods
n 12
z Daily Compounding: $1 invested at an annual rate of
8% compounded daily yields at the end of one year:
r .08 365
FV = (1 + ) n PV = (1+ ) x $1= $1.0833
n 365
Pulvino 2003 51 Pulvino 2003 52
12 $1.0830 8.30%
PMT 1
$400,000 = 1 (1 + (.08 / 12))360
(.08 / 12)
365 $1.0833 8.33%
PMT = $2,935.06
$1.0833 8.33%
9
Example: Mortgage Time Value of Money using EXCEL
Spreadsheet A Spreadsheet B
Interest Rate 8.00% Month Payment IRR
-400000 0.67%
Month Payment NPV Jan-01 2935.06
Jan-01
Feb-01
2935.06
2935.06
$36,688 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
2935.06
2935.06
2935.06
Investment Evaluation
Mar-01 2935.06 May-01 2935.06
10
Net Present Value Example
Time 0 1 2 3 4 5
Time 0 1 2 3 4 5 Period
Period
Activity Buy Operate Operate Operate Operate Operate Activity Lease Lease Lease Lease Lease
Medallion Cab Cab Cab Cab Cab Medallion Medallion Medallion Medallion Medallion
Cashflow -$200 $120 $120 $120 $120 $120 +
$200 Cashflow $83.6k $83.6k $83.6k $83.6k $83.6k
11
Internal Rate of Return (IRR) IRR (continued)
z Approach 700
NPV = $379 when discount rate=10
Calculate amount and timing of cashflows 600
z Previous Example:
z NPV measures absolute performance whereas IRR measures
Buy Medallion:
$120 K $120 K $320 K relative performance
NPV = 0 = $200 K + 1 + 2 + ... + 5 Accept project if NPV > 0
(1+ IRR ) (1+ IRR ) (1+ IRR ) Accept project if IRR > Opportunity Cost of Capital
IRR = 60% z IRR has significant shortcomings
Solving for IRR can give multiple solutions. Which one is correct?
Lease Medallion:
IRR is not good at distinguishing between mutually exclusive
$83.6 K $83.6 K $83.6 K projects
NPV = 0 = 1 + 2 + ... + 5 IRR is not good at accounting for project scale
(1+ IRR ) (1 + IRR ) (1+ IRR )
IRR assumes that interim cashflows can be reinvested at the IRR
IRR = IRR does not distinguish between borrowing and lending
IRR is well suited for flat term structure, but not for other term
IRR implies that it is better to lease than to buy. Why is the structures of interest rates
conclusion different from that obtained using NPV?
12
Other Evaluation Methods
Problems:
Denominator (Investment) is a book value, not a market value
Numerator is earnings, not cashflow
Ratios typically reflect a single yearthey ignore future years
z Many unprofitable companies stay in business for a z Valuing projects and firms requires the calculation of
long timebecause they have cash EXPECTED cashflows
Pharma companies provide good examples: Free Cashflow = Revenue Costs Depreciation Taxes
Alkermes Inc: Sales = $54M, Net Income = -$92.2M, Market Cap = +Depreciation NWC Capital Expenditures
$1.16B, Cash = $104.7M
z Ratios used to assess a firms health can also be z Example: Salest = $100M, COGSt = $75M
used to forecast future financial performance Assume 5% sales growth
z Common approach is to use Percent of Sales to Assume constant COGS/Sales ratio
forecast income statement and balance sheet items z COGS Projections:
First, project sales growth Salest+1 = (1 + .05)(Salest) = (1.05)(100) = $105M
Second, project future ratios (based on past ratios) COGSt+1 = (0.75)(Salest+1) = (0.75)(105) = $79M
z Percent of Sales approach is reasonable when
Historic ratios are stable
Significant operational changes are not expected
13
Other Ratios Financial Forecasting
z Days Payable, Days Receivable, Inventory Turnover,can be z Bottom Line: Reasonable estimates/ASSUMPTIONS
used to project many balance sheet items
are required for all income statement and balance
z Examples:
Days Receivable x Sales sheet line items
A / Rt +1 =
365
Days Payable x COGS
A / Pt +1 =
365
z Days Payable, Days Receivable, can be obtained from:
historical financial statements
industry norms
bottoms-up projections
14
Return versus Risk What is Risk?
z We assume that individuals dont like risk z What matters is how much risk an asset adds to a
portfolio
z Therefore, in order to bear risk, investors will demand z The risk that one asset adds to a portfolio depends
a higher rate of return not only on the assets variance, but also on the
covariance (correlation) of the asset return with the
returns on the other assets already in the portfolio
z The central tradeoff in finance is between risk and
return
Portfolio
Unique Risk z What kind of risk matters to investors?
Standard
Systematic risk matters, idiosyncratic risk can be diversified
Deviation
away
Number of
1 5 10 15
Securities
Total Risk = Unique Risk + Market Risk
Total Risk = Idiosyncratic Risk + Systematic Risk
Pulvino 2003 89 Pulvino 2003 90
15
Systematic vs. Idiosyncratic Risk
(continued) Covariance vs. Variance
z Therefore, the risk premium on the market portfolio z The risk that one asset adds to a portfolio depends
depends on its variance: primarily on the assets covariance with other assets
rmarket - rf = f(Market2) in the portfolio
z The risk premium for individual assets depends on z The effect of variance is smallthe effect of
how much risk they add to a well-diversified portfolio: covariance is big. Why?
rasset i - rf = f(MARGINAL Risk)
Covariance Example
z How many covariances enter into the computation of Var(A1 + z Suppose we invest $999,000 in a well diversified portfolio, and
A2)? $1000 (0.1%) in Yahoo. How much risk does Yahoo add to the
Var(A1+A2) = 2 variances and 2 covariances total portfolio risk?
Var(rP) = Var(0.999rP-Yaho+0.001rYahoo)
z How many covariances enter into the computation of
= (0.999)2 x Var(rP-Yahoo) + (0.001)2 x Var(rYahoo)
Var(A1+A2+A3)? + 2(0.999)(0.001)cov(rP-Yahoo,rYahoo)
Var(A1+A2+A3) = 3 variances and 6 covariances
= (0.998) x Var(rP-Yahoo) + (0.000001) x Var(rYahoo)
z How many covariances enter into the computation of
+ (0.002)cov(rP-Yahoo,rYahoo)
Var(A1+A2++A100)?
Var(A1+A2+..+A100) = 100 variances and 9900 covariances
z What is the marginal contribution of the VARIANCE z Consider the effect of further reducing the percentage of Yahoo in the
portfolio
of Yahoos return to the total portfolio risk? The effect of variance diminishes quickly
(0.001)2 = 0.000001 = 0.0001%
The effect of covariance diminishes slowly
z What is the marginal contribution of the z Therefore,
COVARIANCE of Yahoos return to the total portfolio Var(rP) is proportional to Cov(rP-Yahoo,rYahoo,)
risk? Or
Var(rP)/Var(rP) is proportional to Cov(rP-Yahoo,rYahoo,)/ Var(rP)
0.002 = 0.2%2000 times larger!
z Cov(rP-Yahoo,rYahoo,)/ Var(rP) is known as Beta if Portfolio=Market
Portfolio
Yahoo = Cov(rMarket-Yahoo,rYahoo,)/ Var(rMarket)
16
Summaryso far Capital Asset Pricing Model
z Idiosyncratic risk can be eliminated by combining assets in a well- z Presumably, investors prefer assets that generate the greatest excess
diversified portfolio return for a given level of risk
z The most diversified portfolio is the market portfolio (includes ALL z In equilibrium, the ratio of excess return to risk should be the same for
assets) all investments
Therefore: rMarket rf rAsset i rf
z The risk of the market portfolio is measured by its varianceit cannot z =
be diversified further 2Market i,Market
z For individual assets, return variance is NOT a good measure of z This simplifies to give an equation for the EXPECTED return for any
riskthe covariance of the asset returns with the returns from a well- asset:
diversified portfolio is a much better measure of risk rAsset i = rf + Asset i (rMarket rf )
i,Market
where i =
2Market
rAsset i = rf + i (rMarket rf )
Risk
Time value
of money
rAsset i = rf + i (rMarket rf ) z
z
What is the beta of the market portfolio?
What is the beta of the risk-free asset?
z What is the expected return of an asset with a
Expected Return
negative beta?
rM
on Asset i
rf
1.0
Beta
Pulvino 2003 101 Pulvino 2003 102
17
Summary
Measuring Beta
Measuring Beta (continued)
Measuring Beta
(continued) Risk
18
Type of Risk Type of Risk (continued)
19
Summary
D
E = A + (A D )
E
Business Financial
Risk Risk
Pulvino 2003 119 Pulvino 2003 120
20
Adjusting Rates of Return Portfolio of Assets
z Equations are also valid if rates of return (rather than ValueAsset1 ValueAsset 2
betas) are used A = Asset1 + Asset 2
Value of Total Assets Value of Total Assets
D E
rA = rD + rE
D+E D+E
D E
A = D + E
D+E D+E
D
rE = rA + (rA rD )
E
z Because debt betas and expected returns are difficult to z To value assets, you need to know the risk
measure, simplifying assumptions are often used: characteristics of the assets
Assume a debt beta
z Mimicking firms are often used to assess a projects
Rating AAA AA A BBB Junk risk characteristics
Beta 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.22 0.3 - Asset z But you must remember to adjust for:
Source: Fama, Gene and Ken French, 1993, "Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Bonds and Stocks," Journal of
Financial Economics, 33, 3-56, Table 4 (Investment grade debt only). 1. Asset Mix
2. Financial Leverage
Basics
21
Methodology Dilbert on Capital Budgeting
z Possibilities include:
IRR, Payback Period, Profitability Index,...
But they have problems!
z Net Present Value
T Expected Free Cashflow t
NPV =
t =1 (1 + rExpected ) t
22
Diagnosing Health: Liquidity Diagnosing Health: Leverage
z Ability to meet short-run obligations is typically measured by: z Financial Leverage is typically measured by:
Coverage Ratio = EBIT/Interest Expense = 4.5/0.4 = 11.3
Leverage Ratio = Debt/Total Assets
Current Ratio = Current Assets/Current Liabilities
= 1.6/11.5 = 14%
= 10.3/3.6 = 2.9
Quick Ratio = (Current Assets Inventory)/Current Liabilities D/E Ratio = Debt/Equity
= (10.3 - 0)/3.6 = 2.9 (This is also called Acid Test) = 1.6/7.8 = 0.21
z Liquidity can be improved by: z Should BOOK values or MARKET values be used?
Reducing short-term financing and increasing long-term financing In general, market values are most informative
Decreasing fixed assets However, rating agencies and lenders often use book values
Increasing working capital level and decreasing working capital For capital budgeting and discount rate calculations, always
requirement
use MARKET VALUES
= 0.45 = 45%
23
Ratios and Bond Ratings One Summary Slide
24