Syntel CQA Forum Comparison of Quality Principles CQA Doc No 7
Points for Quality Improvement ( C 14, D - 14, J 10)
Sl Deming Juran Crosby No. ( 14 Points) ( 10 Points) ( 14 points) 1. Constancy of purpose Build awareness of need and Make it clear that management is opportunity for improvement. committed to quality. 2. A new philosophy Set goals for improvement. Form Quality improvement teams with each department represented. 3. Cease dependence on Organize to reach goals Determine where current and inspection potential problems lie. 4. End lowest tender Provide training Evaluate the cost of quality and contracts explain its use as a tool 5. Improve every process Carry out projects to solve Raise the quality awareness and problems concern of all employees 6. Institute training on the Report progress Take actions to correct problems job identified. 7. Institute leadership Give Recognition. Establish a committee for the Zero defects program 8. Drive out fear Communicate results Train supervisors to actively carry out their role in quality improvement. 9. Break down barriers Keep score Hold a zero defects day for all employees to highlight the changes. 10. Eliminate exhortation Maintain momentum by Encourage individuals to establish making annual improvement improvement goals part of regular process of the company 11. Eliminate targets Encourage communication with management about obstacles to improvement 12. Permit pride of Recognize and appreciate the workmanship participants. 13. Encourage education Establish quality councils to aid communication. 14. Create top management Do it all over again to show it never Structures. ends.
Doc No 19 Quality Improvement Page 1 of 2
Syntel CQA Forum Comparison of Quality Principles CQA Doc No 7
Comparison of Principal ideas of Deming, Juran and Crosby
Deming Juran Crosby
Definition Predictable degree of Fitness for purpose Conformance to uniformity and Requirements dependability at low cost Senior management Responsible for 94% of Responsible for > 80% of Responsible for Quality responsibility problems problems Performance Many scales: use SPC Avoid campaigns to Zero defects standard exhort perfection General approach Reduce Variability: Emphasis on Prevention Continuos Improvement management of human aspects Structure 14 steps 10 steps 14 steps SPC SPC must be used Recommends SPC but Rejects Statistically cautions against tool acceptable level of quality based approach Basis for Continuos: eliminate Project based approach: A process, not a program improvement goals set goals
Team work Employee participation in Team / Quality circle Quality improvement
decisions teams
Costs of Quality No optimum, Continuos Optimum, Quality is not Quality is free
improvement free Purchasing Use SPC through strong Complex problems, use Supplier is extension of co-operation formal surveys business Vendor rating No Yes, but work with Yes suppliers Single sourcing of Yes No supply