TGL L & M EHS Assurance Audit

0
Rev Date Reason for Issue Prepared Checked
TULLOW DOCUMENT NUMBER :

Contract Number Area System Code Responsible Party

Code
Tullow Oil Ghana Ltd.
This document is the property of (TULLOW). It is furnished to establish requirements for a specific item or activity and solely for that purpose. Th
document is not intended for general circulation and shall not be reproduced or distributed without written permission from TULLOW or its
representative.
udit

Approved
MBER :

Ltd.
or activity and solely for that purpose. This
en permission from TULLOW or its
 TGL L & M EHS Assurance Audit Terms of Reference

1.Objective
TGL L&M EHS are to perform audits of contractors operations to ascertain vessel SMS compliance with the requ
Management System and the Tullow Safety Rules

These audits will be supported by the following:

Review of relevant site documentation (Risk Assessments / Permits / Procedures / Plans) as required

Worksite inspections / interface with Line Management / Supervisors / workforce as required

2.Scope
The scope of this EHS audit is to:
1. Assess to what extent the control of work processes and EHS working practices onboard are aligned to the Tullow
Standard T-EHS-STD-0013 where applicable. This standard provides a formal and consistent approach to managi
workforce i.e. employees and contractors when carrying out work activities on behalf of TGL.
2. Assess to what extend Seacor Marine SMS and TGL's onboard safe system of work meets or exceeds Tullow Oil gr
Tullow Safety Rules T-EHS-STD-001, specifically elements relevant to marine operations and offshore support.
3. Identify and evaluate aspects of safety culture as an important indicator of how behaviours and practices reflect safet
NB: This is a standalone EHS assurance audit that focuses specifically on EHS management onboard the vessel in acco
expectations and terms of contract. This EHS audit is not in any way linked to the established TGL Marine Operations Ma
assurance processes.

Copies of the Tullow Safety Rules and Tullow EHS Management Standard documents shall be made available.

3.Timing
All audits will be scheduled in accordance with the 2016 TGL L&M EHS Assurance plan, the vessel's work schedule and r
ensure effectiveness and minimum disruption to the vessel's day to day operations.

The audit will commence on February TBA and be completed by Brian Nicoll (TGL Logistics & Subsea EHS Manager).

4.Audit Team
The audit team will be led by TGL Subsea & Logistics EHS Manager and TGL EHSASP Vessel Representative

5.Programme
The programme for the audit and associated activities is shown in the table below.

Date/ Time Schedule / Location

 6.Reporting
The TGL Subsea & Logistics EHS Manager will present the audit findings and observations to the site personnel and ma
close out meeting and will deliver a draft report within 2 days of the end of the audit visit for comment. The formal re
be issued through TGL stakeholders within one week of the end of the visit.

The report will contain findings, with their significance, and recommended actions in a tabular format. The report will a
audit assessment rating. To align with Tullow Internal Audit Guidelines, the overall audit assessment will be one of four

Excellent recognising/ exceeding Industry best practice exemplary performance

Good meets intent of EHS plan or guiding document, industry standard
Fair, Minor Non Conformances with EHS standards, industry standard
Major Non Conformance Significant breach of EHS managment standards, failure to meet industry standards

Key to the scoring system

RATINGS
Not observed
1 Major Non Conformance
2 Fair Minor Non Conformance
3 Good - Conformance
4 Excellent Best Practice

The rating will be based upon an assessment by the audit team based on the significance of the audit findings in
severity. Principle strengths and weaknesses of the HSE Management System elements will also be highlighted in t
indicate where attention needs to be focussed.

7.Close out and follow-up after the Audit

During the closing meeting, TGL Subsea & Logistics EHS Manager will highlight close out period for Minor Non-conforma
conformance should there be any

Conformance Close Out Period

Level
Major Non 1-14 days
Conformance

Minor Non 15 - 28 day

Conformance
tors operations to ascertain vessel SMS compliance with the requirements of TGL EHS

sments / Permits / Procedures / Plans) as required

ment / Supervisors / workforce as required

esses and EHS working practices onboard are aligned to the Tullow Oil EHS Management
s standard provides a formal and consistent approach to managing task risk for TGLs
rrying out work activities on behalf of TGL.
d TGL's onboard safe system of work meets or exceeds Tullow Oil group defined standard
ments relevant to marine operations and offshore support.
s an important indicator of how behaviours and practices reflect safety leadership.
focuses specifically on EHS management onboard the vessel in accordance with TGLs EHS
is not in any way linked to the established TGL Marine Operations Manual vessel suitability

Management Standard documents shall be made available.

2016 TGL L&M EHS Assurance plan, the vessel's work schedule and requirements to
he vessel's day to day operations.

completed by Brian Nicoll (TGL Logistics & Subsea EHS Manager).

cs EHS Manager and TGL EHSASP Vessel Representative

ties is shown in the table below.

Attendees required
ent the audit findings and observations to the site personnel and management during the
ithin 2 days of the end of the audit visit for comment. The formal report will subsequently
ek of the end of the visit.

ance, and recommended actions in a tabular format. The report will also contain an overall
nal Audit Guidelines, the overall audit assessment will be one of four bands:

est practice exemplary performance

ocument, industry standard
dards, industry standard
of EHS managment standards, failure to meet industry standards

the audit team based on the significance of the audit findings in terms of number and
the HSE Management System elements will also be highlighted in the report in order to

fter the Audit

EHS Manager will highlight close out period for Minor Non-conformance and Major No-
 Excellent - Best Practice

Good - Conformance

Non Conformance
Fair - Minor Non

Not Observed
Conformance
Reference Documents IF
Item Detailed Action REQUIRED

1.0 EHS Leadership & Behaviour

1.1 Do Vessel Management participate in inspections and audits
1.2 Do Vessel Management participate in meetings & awareness sessions
1.3 Is there visible evidence that Leadership Sponsor EHS initiatives
1.4 A visible written EHS policy posted onboard that is signed by the CEO (or other board mem)
1.5 Evidence of regular visitations from Senior Management with a focus on Safety
Leadership & Behaviour 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.0 EH & SMS
2.1 Does the EHS Manual contain Leading Indicators
2.2 Are Leading Indicators monitored by the contractor
2.3 Does the EHS Manual contain Lagging Indicators
2.4 Are Lagging Indicators tracked by contractor
2.5 Does the EHS Manual contain an Audit Plan
2.6 Does the EHS Manual contain requirements for individual Personal Safety Plans
2.7 Is the EHS Manual current/ or has the plan been revised in the last 12 months
2.8 System implemented to intervene, action and correct at risk behaviours and unsafe conditions.
2.9 Is there a EHS Action Tracker for Observation Close out
EHS Management Plan 0.00
3.0 EHS Targets & Objectives
3.1 Have Leading and Lagging indicators been communicated to site Management Team
3.2 Regular EHS meetings lead by senior members of VMT (formalised and communicated).
3.3 Is vessel EHS performance tracked and trended as part of the KPI's (Key Performance Indicators)
EHS Targets & Objectives 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
 Excellent - Best Practice

Good - Conformance

Non Conformance
Fair - Minor Non

Not Observed
Conformance
Reference Documents IF
Item Detailed Action REQUIRED

4.0 Risk Awareness

4.1 Are the principles of ALARP (As Low as Reasonably Practicable) adopted on the vessel
4.2 Are quantitative and qualitative assessments performed to assess risks
4.3 Are records kept/ database retained for risk assessments
4.4 Has site specific emergency response plan been implemented and tested
4.5 Has site emergency response drills been implemented and tested

4.6 Is there a 'Behavioural Observation' programme implemented on the vessel and within contractors organisations

4.7 Have team members participated in Hazard Awareness and Intervention Training
Risk Awareness 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.0 Reporting of Incidents
5.1 Are personnel allocated specific responsibilities in terms of reporting incidents
5.2 Have personnel received sufficient training on the incident reporting programme
5.3 Does the contractor have a reporting system equivalent to (EMEX)

5.4 Is there a proactive reporting process in place whereby observation, near miss and at risk behaviours are reported

5.5 Does the contractor report incidents accordingly and in compliance to the Emex system for controlled sites NA
5.6 Have cases of MTC/LTI dropped year on year
5.7 Is trending of incident data (MTC/LTI etc) being implemented
Reporting of Incidents 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
 Excellent - Best Practice

Good - Conformance

Non Conformance
Fair - Minor Non

Not Observed
Conformance
Reference Documents IF
Item Detailed Action REQUIRED

6.0 Permit to Work - Safety Rule 1

Is there a Permit to Work system in place for confined space, excavations, work on energised systems (electrical,
6.1 mechanical, hydraulic, thermal) hot work, heavy lifts, working at height, work with hazardous materials (including
radioactive materials) and any non-routine activities

6.2 Are activity and location specified as part of Permit to Work conditions
6.3 Are hazards and controls identified as part Permit to Work requirements
6.4 As part of the Permits to Work, are associated certificates and risk assessments identified
6.5 Are conflicting or concurrent activities identified on the PTW
6.6 Are Permits to Work approved by accountable and responsible parties
6.7 Are Permit to Work issued and controlled by PTW Control Centre or responsible party
6.8 Are permit displayed in work environment
6.9 Are task risk assessments implemented to support the Permit to Work
6.10 Are Hazards and Risks communicated to all involved in the task to be performed prior to commencing work
6.11 Is there evidence Permits to Work have been closed-out upon completion or suspension of the activity
6.12 All personnel associated with Permit to Work have received suitable and sufficient training and competence
Permit to Work 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
7.0 Energy Isolation - Safety Rule 2
7.1 Are all isolation works must be completed under isolation certificates, Permit to Work
7.2 Is equipment is shut down using standard stopping procedures
7.3 Is all equipment isolated from all energy sources

7.4 Are all isolations secured (Locked Out / Tagged Out)with fit for purpose lock out devices

7.5 Have all stored or residual energy dissipated to zero and confirmed
7.6 Have All personnel involved in isolation of energy sources suitably trained and competent
Energy Isolation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
8.0 Working at Height - Safety Rule 3

Has the vessel fully embraced the risk awareness of fall protection - implementing controls as required for working at
8.1 height

8.2 Has alternative methods of work been explored prior to confirming work at height
8.3 Are scaffolds, proprietary systems, fixed structures tested and approved by a competent person prior to use
 Excellent - Best Practice

Good - Conformance

Non Conformance
Fair - Minor Non

Not Observed
Conformance
Reference Documents IF
Item Detailed Action REQUIRED

8.4 Has a task specific risk assessment been performed

8.5 Are those who work at height provided with suitable fall arrest equipment

8.6 Has fall arrest equipment must be visually inspected prior to use and fully maintained during and after usage

8.7 Is there evidence that a safe system of work is to be deployed - no lone working at height adopted
8.8 Is work at height or where fall arrest systems are deployed adequately protected - work areas cordoned off
8.9 Are tools secured as part of the work at height programme reducing potential for dropped objects

8.10 As part of the work at height assessment - conflicting or concurrent activities have been assessed and recorded

8.11 Have rescue plans available for all work at height activities
8.12 All personnel involved in work at height suitably trained and competent.
Working at Height 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
 Excellent - Best Practice

Good - Conformance

Non Conformance
Fair - Minor Non

Not Observed
Conformance
Reference Documents IF
Item Detailed Action REQUIRED

9.0 Lifting Operations -Safety Rule 4

9.1 Are all lifting devices fit for purpose, certified, inspected and confirmed to be in safe working order
9.2 Are Daily and pre-use inspections conducted on all cranes
9.3 Has all Lifting equipment been visually inspected prior to every lift and confirmed safe for use
9.4 Are the Safe Working Loads (SWL) marked on the mechanical lifting device
9.5 Are Mechanical lifting devices operated within the approved safe limits
9.6 Are all Man-riding baskets specially designed, certified and used by dedicated, trained personnel only

9.7 Is there evidence to confirm all lifting equipment has been maintained and records provided to validate maintenance

9.8 Are clear lines of communication maintained between all personnel associated with lifting operations

9.9 Is all rigging equipment been colour coded, included in the vessel inspection programme and stored correctly

9.10 Are Lift Plans completed for specified lifts

9.11 Is there an effective policy whereby no loads are carried above workers, critical plant or equipment below
9.12 Are barriers erected to identify the lifting zone
9.13 Is the access egress to the lifting zones controlled by responsible persons/riggers and banks man

9.14 Are all riggers and banks man associated to lifting operators clearly visible - identifiable by high clearly identified PPE

9.15 Are all personnel associated with lifting and rigging operations suitably trained and competent
Lifting Operations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
 Excellent - Best Practice

Good - Conformance

Non Conformance
Fair - Minor Non

Not Observed
Conformance
Reference Documents IF
Item Detailed Action REQUIRED

10.0 Excavations - Safety Rule 5

10.1 Are all excavation works performed under a permit to work / task assessment
10.2 Has consideration been given to whether excavation work is necessary - is there an alternative approach
Is there an agreed process on site whereby no mechanical digging must not be performed within 0.5 meters of below
10.3 ground services, i.e.: Hand Digging only
10.4 Have all energy sources been identified and isolated
Is there evidence / records confirming periodic atmospheric testing has been performed using calibrated / tested
10.5 equipment
10.6 Is there evidence of sufficient shoring protection afforded to excavation works
10.7 Are signs and barricades positioned to prevent unauthorised access, entry to the excavation
Has all spoil, excavated material been removed and kept clear of excavation edges to prevent collapse or material
10.8 displacement into excavation
10.9 Has the ground and environmental conditions and (prevailing weather) been regularly monitored for change

10.10 Have all waste materials generated through pumping of water and excavated materials been controlled in accordance
to risk assessments
10.11 Are Rescue Plans available for all excavation works
10.12 Have all personnel involved in excavation works been suitably trained and competent
Excavations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
11.0 Confined Space - Safety Rule 6
11.1 Have alternative approach been considered before commencing Confined Space Entry
11.2 Are Confined Space activities being performed under a permit to work
11.3 Are all temporary or permanent Confined Spaces labelled accordingly

11.4 Has atmospheric testing been performed as part of the permit to work requirements prior to Confined Space Entry

11.5 Has periodic atmospheric testing been performed using calibrated / tested equipment during Confined Space Entry

11.6 Have all sources of energy potentially effecting the Confined Space been eliminated or isolated
11.7 Is there a trained and competent Stand-by Person in attendance during Confined Space Entry
11.8 Are there clear lines of communication between all personnel involved in the activities
11.9 Are Rescue Plans in place as part of the permit to work requirements
11.10 Have all personnel associated with Confined Space Entry been trained and competent
Confined Space 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
12.0 Plant / Process Safety - Safety Rule 7
12.1 Has the Plant been designed in accordance to ALARP
12.2 Is the Plant operated in accordance to safe operating parameters - Safe limits
 Excellent - Best Practice

Good - Conformance

Non Conformance
Fair - Minor Non

Not Observed
Conformance
Reference Documents IF
Item Detailed Action REQUIRED

12.3 Is the Plant periodically inspected pre use checks etc

12.4 Has a process HAZOP been performed
12.5 Are all signs safety for equipment clearly identifiable
12.6 Has a risk assessment been conducted prior to operation
12.7 Has the Management of Change Process (MOC) been implemented for changes to equipment
12.8 Is there a planned maintenance system in place for all equipment & plant
12.9 Has the Equipment been subject to FMEA / PUWER Assessment
12.10 Where operator handovers are performed is their a record of process status and conditions
12.11 Have all personnel associated with this equipment been trained and competent
Plant / Process Safety 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
 Excellent - Best Practice

Good - Conformance

Non Conformance
Fair - Minor Non

Not Observed
Conformance
Reference Documents IF
Item Detailed Action REQUIRED

13.0 Management of Change (MOC) - Safety Rule 8

13.1 Is there a management of change process in place on the vessel
13.2 Are hazards associated with change identified as part of the management of change process
13.3 Are suitable controls in place to eliminate risks where changes are changes are identified
13.4 Are procedures and plans changed accordingly to reflect management of change issues
13.5 Is there a process in place whereby management approve changes
13.6 Is there a management of change process in place that is commensurate or reflects the level of risks
13.7 Are controls confirmed prior to continuation and/ or commencement of operations
Management of Change (MOC) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
14.0 Driving Safety - Safety Rule 9
14.1 Are vehicles fit for purpose, inspected and confirmed in safe working order
14.2 Are daily and pre-use inspections performed by the operator of the vehicle
14.3 Is there evidence to validate all personnel / occupants wear three point seat belts when in vehicles
14.4 Are all warning lights, reverse alarms, speedometers functional and maintained accordingly
14.5 Are all vehicles fitted with driver airbags, and passenger airbags where fitted by the manufacturer
14.6 Are all loads secure and loads are not exceeding the vehicle load specification
Is there a process in place where the operator and those wishing to approach vehicle make visual contact or
14.7 communication with the driver/ vehicle operator to ensure safe approach
14.8 Are all drivers trained, certified and medically fit to operate class vehicle
14.9 Do all drivers obey speed limits and site rules

14.10 Do drivers adjust their speed in accordance to journey management plans based on prevailing weather / road
conditions

14.11 Is there a process in place to verify drivers are not under the influence of alcohol, drugs or suffering from fatigue

14.12 Is the non use of hand-held cell phones/ mobile devices complied with on the vessel by all drivers
14.13 Are drivers of vessel vehicle restricted using the vehicle outside of city limits
Driving Safety 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
15.0 Hazardous Material (COSHH) - Safety Rule 10
15.1 Have alternative measures been assessed prior to confirming use of hazardous materials
15.2 Is there a risk assessment for use of hazardous materials
15.3 Is there a register maintained for all hazardous materials on site/ facility
15.4 Are works involving hazardous materials completed under a written permit to work
15.5 Are MSDS sheets / COSHH Assessments available and kept up to date
15.6 Is the appropriate PPE available and worn
 Excellent - Best Practice

Good - Conformance

Non Conformance
Fair - Minor Non

Not Observed
Conformance
Reference Documents IF
Item Detailed Action REQUIRED

15.7 Are the appropriate first aid arrangements in place and fit for purpose
15.8 Are hazardous material containers, vessels adequately labelled
15.9 Are hazardous materials segregated from incompatible materials and hazardous areas
15.10 Are personnel associate to the handling use of hazardous materials trained and competent
Hazardous Material 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
 Excellent - Best Practice

Good - Conformance

Non Conformance
Fair - Minor Non

Not Observed
Conformance
Reference Documents IF
Item Detailed Action REQUIRED

16.0 Contractor Management - Safety Rule 11

16.1 Has the contractors scope of work been clearly defined
16.2 Has the contractors selection included EHS Performance evaluation
16.3 Has the contractors management system been identified, verified and agreed by all parties
16.4 Is the contractors performance periodically monitored, evaluated and recorded
Are areas of poor or negative contractors performance monitored and evaluated as part of ongoing contractors
16.5 evaluations
Contractor Management 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
17.0 Environmental Management - Safety Rule 12
17.1 Are environmental hazards and controls identified
17.2 Are environmental incidents reported and recorded
17.3 Is there an effective recycling, waste management programme in place
17.4 Are all discharges completed in accordance with regulatory requirements
17.5 Are their sufficient oil and spill response programmes in place
17.6 Are spill response exercises conducted to validate procedures
Environmental Management 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
 Excellent - Best Practice

Good - Conformance

Non Conformance
Fair - Minor Non

Not Observed
Conformance
Reference Documents IF
Item Detailed Action REQUIRED

18.0 Health & Hygiene - Safety Rule 13

18.1 Are health and hygienic controls identified
18.2 Are suitable and sufficient health controls in place
18.3 Are all incidents with actual/potential impact on health and hygiene reported
18.4 Have medical assessments been performed on all employees and contractors
18.5 Is the appropriate protective equipment work to prevent health and hygiene exposure
18.6 Have the appropriate emergency medical provisions been provided
18.7 Is there a process in place to measure/manage worker fatigue
18.8 Are malaria risks specifically assessed
18.9 Is their a process to verify worker influence/exposure to alcohol and drug usage
Health & Hygiene 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Excellent - Best Practice

Good - Conformance

Non Conformance
Fair - Minor Non

Not Observed
Conformance
TOTAL PERCENTAGE 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Compliant 0.00%

Total Non Compliant 0.00%
Not Observed 0.00%
Comments
Comments
Comments
Comments
Comments
Comments
Comments
Comments
Comments
Comments
Comments