Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Association I. EDITORIAL
This is the 50th issue of the Geneva Association Information
1
II. ARTICLES 2
Patrick M. Liedtke discusses the impact of the financial reporting
system on the cost of capital for insurance companies. This is a
fundamental indicator of competitiveness, not only within the insurance
sector but also for insurance in comparison to other businesses that are
competing for investments in the capital markets.
The research programme on risk and insurance economics comprises the theoretical and academic
activities of our organisation.
It is dedicated to make an original contribution to the progress of insurance through promoting studies of
the interdependence between economics and insurance, to highlight the importance of risk and
insurance economics as part of the modern general economic theory, to detect and define special aims
for research programmes in risk and insurance economics, to stimulate and support academic and
professional research work in risk and insurance economics throughout the world, and to diffuse
knowledge and the results of research in risk and insurance economics world-wide.
Anyone wishing to be included on the Newsletter mailing list should visit our webpage at
www.genevaassociation.org or contact the Geneva Association Secretariat at:
Tel.no: 0041-22-707 6600, Fax 0041-22-736 7536 or E-mail: info@genevaassociation.org
The Geneva Association Newsletter Insurance Economists, No. 50, July 2004
Newsletter for the European Group of Risk and Insurance Economists
This Newsletter for Risk and Insurance Economists is published biannually by the Geneva Association as an
information and liaison bulletin to promote contacts between economists at universities and in insurance and
financial services companies with an interest in risk and insurance economics. Any suggestions concerning the
content or layout of the newsletter are welcome. Please notify us if you are interested in receiving this
publication regularly.
I. EDITORIAL
This is the 50th issue of the Geneva Association Information Newsletter on Insurance Economics. It was
the first of its kind to be introduced almost 30 years ago and served as a role model for similar
newsletters that cover other parts of the research activities of The Geneva Association and its networks.
The chief reasons for the introduction of this newsletter at the time were the following:
The newly founded European Group of Risk and Insurance Economists (EGRIE) needed a joint
reference point and information sharing mechanism for issues of interest to the group.
(The Insurance Economics Newsletter carries to this day the subtitle Newsletter for the European
Group of Risk and Insurance Economists)
The Geneva Association, then as founding institution of EGRIE and still today as guardian angel
and partner, found it useful as tool to stimulate the interest of researchers.
Articles, and to a lesser degree editorials, could open up and advance discussions on theoretical
issues linked to insurance.
From its humble beginnings, when only several dozen copies were produced at The Geneva Association
with only the most rudimentary techniques available at the time to a small organization like ours, until
today, when about 5000 hardcopies and several thousand electronic copies find their way onto the
desks of our readers, the Insurance Economics Newsletter has been the backbone of the information
flow between The Geneva Association and the insurance academia. A reproduction of the first
newsletter, dated 4 November 1974, can be found in chapter 3 of this issue. Due to the lack of quality of
the only existing copy of the newsletter at The Geneva Association, it was unfortunately not possible to
include a photographic reproduction of the original, but Ms Ariane Klein has done an excellent job in
putting together a version that is very close to the original. Although one has to admit that, having seen
both the historic and the reproduction, the latter looks of course much too new.
It is certainly of more than just historic interest to take a closer look at the topics that moved the
insurance researchers back in 1974. In some areas huge advancements have taken place in the past 30
years. And yet, some of the titles could easily be mistaken as current research headings as we still have
to find solutions to some of the problems that insurance has been facing for decades.
Where are we heading? One of the most important developments on an organizational level is certainly
the World Risk and Insurance Economics Congress that will take place for the first time from 7 to 11
August 2005 in Salt Lake City in the US. The American Risk and Insurance Association (ARIA), Asia-
Pacific Risk and Insurance Association (APRIA), European Group of Risk and Insurance Economists
(EGRIE), and The Geneva Association (GA) are jointly organizing this landmark event. It is open to all
persons academics, industry executives and professionals, and government officials who share an
interest in promoting education and research in the broad areas of risk and insurance. The purposes of
the Congress are to stimulate corporate awareness and interest in risk-related research and to provide a
forum for networking among academics and industry and government professional worldwide. The
Congress will therefore not only provide a unique chance for insurance academics and researchers from
all over the world to get together, but it should also tie in the professional establishment, hopefully
creating stronger ties for the future that will allow for increased collaboration and a better exchange of
ideas and information.
In this issue we also discuss the question of insurance accounting and the cost of capital, touching upon
two fields that will see much research in the future. As the industry and academe evolve, so will this
newsletter. We hope that it has been able to provide you with interesting topics in the past 30 years and
we are already looking forward to a grand celebration when the 100th issue will be published perhaps
in the year 2029 if we continue the current trend of two issues per year.
Patrick M. Liedtke
Editor
1
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
II. Articles
This article is based on one chapter of the second report by Gerry Dickinson and Patrick M. Liedtke to
The Geneva Associations Accountancy Task Force, which provides an empirical analysis of the views of
insurance companies on the likely impact that an international financial reporting standard based on a
full fair value methodology, if it were to be introduced, would have on a number of their key corporate
policy areas. This research report is a sequel to the earlier report: The Search for an International
Accounting Standard for Insurance. Both documents can be downloaded for free from our website
www.genevaassociation.org.
During the preparation of the report, we had numerous discussions on one of the key issues that
insurers feel would make a great difference to their business: the impact of the financial reporting system
on their cost of capital. This is of course a fundamental indicator of competitiveness, not only within the
insurance sector but perhaps even more importantly for insurance in comparison to other businesses
that are competing for investments in the capital markets.
There are several reasons why insurance companies require a certain amount of capital to operate. Most
importantly, insurance companies need to hold capital to absorb the risks that they assume. There are
also regulatory requirements on insurers to hold capital to reduce the probability of insolvency and these
capital adequacy rules often require insurers to hold more capital than management, and their
shareholders, consider necessary. Hence capital is a key constraint on the supply of insurance. If the
cost of capital is high, this will increase the cost of insurance and/or discourage the level of supply.
Moreover, since there are substitute products to insurance, including ART and self-insurance, if the cost
of capital for insurers is higher than that facing these alternative suppliers, insurers will be less able to
compete.
If capital markets are fully information efficient, the way that companies report their financial performance
should not matter. Capital market participants would determine the share prices of insurance companies,
and hence their cost of equity capital, based on expected growth and stability of future earnings
streams, and other relevant factors. The available evidence suggests that capital market participants are
risk averse and so companies with a higher level of expected (relative) volatility in their earnings, for the
same growth of earnings, face a higher cost of capital.
One of the key arguments put forward by proponents of a new financial reporting standard is that the
current way in which companies report on their results is neither objective nor transparent enough.
Transparency is a more general requirement of financial statements, as it lies at the heart of disclosure
itself. The information contained in published accounts should provide users with as much relevant and
reliable information as they need to make their decisions, within appropriate cost and competition
considerations; financial statements should not be opaque or hard to understand, and they should not
hide any material information that the users need to know. At the level of the capital market as a whole, a
high level of quality disclosure helps to ensure that markets operate efficiently and fairly; the overall cost
of capital should be lower and there would be less scope for asymmetrical information to distort the
pricing of securities.
The less transparent and objective a financial reporting system is, the more uncertainty it creates among
investors as to the capacity to generate future returns and their stability. Ceteris paribus, a new rule that
increases the transparency (or the objectivity) of financial reports, will reduce investor uncertainty and, in
a risk-adverse capital market, lead to a higher stock evaluation. Financial analysts spend a lot of their
time trying to predict future earnings per share and, as was confirmed during a series of interviews in
1
Secretary General and Managing Director of The Geneva Association
2
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
New York and London with a number of the leading analysts of the insurance industry, the predictability
and constancy of future earnings is a key factor in their recommendations.
Let us examine the impact of introducing a full fair value approach in insurance accounting. If the
volatility in profit and loss accounts (income statements) and balance sheets under a full fair value
approach reflected real volatility, this volatility would be factored into share prices in an information
efficient capital market. Since some of the uncertainty would be eliminated, the stocks should be traded
higher than under the current reporting system. However, if a full fair value reporting system provides
information noise unrelated to real volatility of the underlying cash flows, as could well be the case
where there are highly subjective estimates of market prices for non-traded insurance liabilities and/or
the underlying asset-liability relationships are not accurately captured, then this could lead to the
mispricing of shares, even in an information efficient stock market (with the exception of the strong form
of market efficiency). And the case for assuming the information efficiency of capital markets is not as
compelling as it once was, in the light of asset prices bubbles. Hence there is a theoretical case for
arguing that reported volatility will lead to lower share prices and a higher cost of capital.
Consequently, it is from a theoretical viewpoint well possible that changes to the financial accounting
system decrease the cost of capital as the true volatility is better captured by the new rules. At the same
time, however, they could well have the opposite effect too, i.e. increasing the cost of capital, as
additional artificial (reported) volatility is introduced.
It is very difficult to predict the real-world effect of a change of the accounting system. In order to address
this issue, The Geneva Associations survey sought to ask senior managers of insurance companies if
they considered that the higher volatility in earnings, that would arise under a full fair value reporting
system, would cause their cost of capital to increase or decrease or have little or no effect. These are
clearly opinions, unlike other questions in the survey which relate to their own policy decisions and
hence have a firmer basis. However, as senior management in insurance companies are close
observers of capital markets as major institutional investors, their opinions should carry some weight,
even though no definitive conclusions can be drawn from their statements. Clearly, whether the cost of
capital might change or not is an empirical question, requiring more detailed analysis.
50% 45.7%
41.9% 41.9%
40% 37.1%
Life
30% Non-life
10%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0%
Major Significant Little or no Significant Major
increase in increase in effect decrease in decrease in
cost of cost of cost of cost of
capital capital capital capital
3
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
Non-
Life life
Major increase in cost of capital 13 13
Significant increase in cost of capital 16 13
Little or no effect 6 5
Significant decrease in cost of capital 0 0
Major decrease in cost of capital 0 0
No. of responses 35 31
The responses are given in Figure 1 and the table immediately following it. The responses were divided
into life and non-life operations, even for companies writing both classes of insurance, since the cost of
capital might differ for life and non-life. Close to 83% of life insurers considered that the cost of capital
would rise, while 17% considered it would not change much. There was a similar pattern of responses
for non-life insurers, with about 84% viewing that the cost of capital would rise and 16% viewing that
there would be little or no effect. No company thought the cost of capital would fall. Thirty-seven per cent
of life insurers and 42% of non-life insurers perceived that there might be a major increase.
Most companies considered that the stock market did not like volatility in reported earnings and would
demand an extra risk premium, thus increasing the cost of capital. Two contributing factors were
advanced for this: (i) much of the volatility of reported earnings of insurance companies, especially for
their life operations, would be spurious in view of the long term nature of insurance; (ii) companies in
other industries, including commercial banks, were likely to be allowed to continue reporting their
earnings on a deferral and matching basis, and hence an unlevel playing field would be created.
In addition, it was observed that a fair value reporting system was more likely to cause insurers to raise
capital at the wrong time, i.e. when it was more costly. This was based on the following scenario that
was advanced by one respondent. A temporary fall in asset prices, especially if accompanied by an
increase in the fair value on insurance liabilities induced by the same negative sentiment in the market,
would depress the reported equity capital level of an insurer. As a result the insurer could be forced to
raise new capital in these depressed stock market conditions either due to pressure from insurance
supervisors or rating agencies, or to restore confidence with brokers, corporate consumers and other
insurance market participants.
One of the reasons why the proposed full fair value methodology is running into resistance from the
insurance sector is that companies believe that any positive effects are far outweighed by the negative
ones. As one US reinsurer said: There would be a major increase in the cost of capital because of
artificial volatility. Any future solution for the new financial reporting system should address this issue.
* * * * *
Free Download
Two reports of The Geneva Association on insurance and international financial reporting standards:
1. Accountancy Task Force I The Search for an International Accounting Standard for Insurance,
published in February, 2003
Download from http://www.genevaassociation.org/ATFReport.htm
2. Accountancy Task Force II
Impact of a Fair Value Financial Reporting System on Insurance Companies A Survey,
published in June 2004
Download from http://www.genevaassociation.org/ATFReport.htm
4
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
Association de Genve
ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONALE POUR LETUDE DE LECONOMIE DE LASSURANCE Newsletter
November 4, 1974
FOR RISK AND INSURANCE ECONOMISTS POUR LES ECONOMISTES DE LASSURANCE
8, CHEMIN RIEU, 1208 GENVE TEL.022/470938 TELEX:23358 TELEGRAMME: ECOSUR GENVE
5
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
6
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
2. Insurance teaching
As to this subject, Dr. Carter asks his European collegues to supply details
of degree structures (e.g. as per the following diagram), their syllabus(es)
for insura courses and any ideas they have for future developments. Below the
Nottingham degre structure
UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM
P
A Industrial Industrial Option Option or
R
Organisation Administration Dissertation
T
II
2
y Industrial Subsidiary Option Quantitative
e
Economics Subject Methods
a
r
s
P
A Industrial Subsidiary Subsidiary Statistics
R
Economics Subject Subject
T
I
1 yr.
7
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
3. Coming seminars
For the middle of February 1975, a small seminar is scheduled at the Geneva
Association office, in order to bring together insurance economists and
insurance practitioners.
The intermediate results of research sponsored by our Association on present
developments in risk and insurance management in European based industrial
companies will be presented and submitted for discussion, with the help of
papers on studies conducted on similar subjects.
In the summer of 1975 the second European insurance economists seminar will
be organized in Geneva.
* * *
8
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
Introduction
This analysis was carried out on the occasion of The Geneva Associations 30th birthday in the summer
of 2003. The results were presented at the 30th meeting of the European Group of Risk and Insurance
Economists in Zurich.
This analysis contains statistics based on reference information supplied by the 27 issues of the Geneva
Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, Vol.15-No.1/1990 until Vol. 27-No.2/2002. The data were
classified by Geneva Papers Issues, Author, Year, Title and Publication.
A total of 142 papers and 2892 references were analysed.
The different tables that will be presented in this and the coming issue of the Geneva Association
Insurance Newsletter on Economics, supply information concerning the following questions:
Part 1: (see Insurance Economics no. 49 of January 2004)
1a) Who is the author with the highest number of published papers?
1b) Who is the most referenced author of this publication?
Part 2:
2a) Which article has been cited most often?
2b) In which publication (journal) can one find the most referred to papers?
2c) From which years date the most cited papers?
9
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
Curiosity
A more recent paper with the potential to become a classic in the journal is "Optimal Insurance Without
Expected Utility: The Dual Theory and the Linearity of Insurance Contracts" (1995) by Neil A. Doherty &
Louis Eeckhoudt. Despite being written only in 1995, it already shows up in this table. If normal
development takes place, it will be higher on the list in the coming years.
2b) In which publication (journal) can one find the most referred to papers?
5. Geneva Papers 0
y
ry
w
s
ty
ce
w
a
e
rs
m
ie
nc
eo
ie
in
pe
an
m
no
ev
ev
ta
et
na
Th
no
Pa
ur
co
er
R
om
Fi
s
co
7. Journal of Finance
ic
nc
E
ic
a
In
ic
on
f
ev
fE
m
al
lo
om
U
d
no
no
Ec
ic
en
an
na
lo
d
on
t
an
co
co
ol
ur
na
k
Ec
fE
fP
is
lE
Jo
sk
ur
fR
lo
lo
an
na
Jo
fR
lo
na
na
io
rly
lo
er
na
at
ur
ur
rte
na
Am
rn
Jo
Jo
ur
ur
ua
te
Jo
In
Q
10
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
The most referred to journals were Econometrica, with 238 credits and the Journal of Economic Theory
with 195 credits. In third and fourth place are Journal of Political Economy and American Economic
Review with 114 and 110 references espectively.
Curiosity
The top ten journals only account for 2892 references, which amounts to just 39% of the total.
This underlines how broad the sources for relevant information are.
200
194
180 182
159
160
147
140
142
124
120 120
108
106 117
115
105
100
98
81
80 78
67
60 72
60 54 66
58
44 44 55 49
40 46
42 41
30
16 16 19 19 23
20 24
10 22
6 14 18
8 12 10 8
1 1 1 11 11
6 3 3
0
51
53
55
57
59
61
63
65
67
69
71
73
75
77
79
81
83
85
87
89
91
93
95
97
99
01
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
The graph shows an upward trend until about 1990. After that year, the number of cited papers by year
has fallen almost continnously. One possible explanation for this trend could be that the profession
needs about a decade to fully appreciate earlier work, which has to overcome an important time lag to
fully show up in references. After about 10 years, it seems that papers become outdated and score few
new references.
Curiosity
In Vol. 27/ No.2 (1), the authors Pauline Barrieu and Nicole El Karoui in Reinsuring Climatic Risk Using
Optimally Designed Weather Bonds referred to the oldest article, written in 1900 by L. Bachelier on
Thorie de Ia Speculation.
* * * * *
11
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
9.00 - 9.30 Presentation by David Cummins, Alternative risk transfer and securization
12
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
13
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
The American Risk and Insurance Association (ARIA), Asia-Pacific Risk and Insurance Association (APRIA),
European Group of Risk and Insurance Economists (EGRIE), and The Geneva Association (GA) are jointly
organizing the first World Risk and Insurance Economics Congress.
The Congress is open to all persons academics, industry executives and professionals, and government
officials who share an interest in promoting education and research in the broad areas
of risk and insurance. The purposes of the Congress are to stimulate corporate awareness and interest in
risk-related research and to provide a forum for networking among academics and industry
and government professional worldwide. ARIA is graciously hosting this first Congress.
The organizers invite submission of proposals to present theoretical or applied research dealing with issues in
risk management, insurance, and actuarial science.
The Deadline for Proposal Submission is 5 January 2005.
The proposal must be in English in PDF format. Each proposal should include a cover page containing the
paper title, the names and affiliations of each author, contact information for at least one author, and a three-
page text explaining the purpose and importance of the research, planned research methodology, and
expected results. A full paper in lieu of proposal is welcome.
Travel Financial Aid. The organizers will provide limited financial aid to those authors from selected least
developed countries whose papers are judged to be of high quality and who certify that their employing
institutions provide no travel support for attending the Congress. The aid comprises a waiver of the Congress
registration fee and a cash award of US$500 to be given upon the recipients arrival at the Congress venue.
Applicants should request aid at the time of proposal submission, certifying their need for such and including
their curriculum vitae, by the proposal deadline.
Successful applicants will be notified of results on or about 1 April 2005.
For more information about the Congress, visit its web site at www.wriec.org, or send an e-mail inquiry to
WRIEC Secretariat at Secretariat@wriec.org.
14
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
15
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
Montepaschi Vita
in partnership with Geneva Association and Ania
presents
2004
Montepaschi Vita Annual Forum
16
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
CONCLUSIONS
MONTEPASCHI VITA
* to be confirmed
17
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
*
Preliminary programme
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 21
Chair: Prof Domenico Romeo, Rector of the University of Trieste and former President of the Trieste
Science Park
9.30 SESSION 1
The biological limits: extending the life cycle, how far conditions and consequences
Dr Jean-Marie Robine, Network on Health Expectancy, Montpellier,
"Limits of human longevity: empirical evidence"
Prof. Vincenzo Marigliano, University La Sapienza, Rome
Prof. Giorgio Stanta, University of Trieste, "Extending Life - Disease Pattern Shift"
* As of 24.06.2004. Simultaneous translation in English and Italian. For further information, please contact Dr Christophe
Courbage (Head of Research) at the secretariat of the Geneva Association. Tel. +41 22 707 66 00. Fax. +41 22 736 75 76.
Email: christophe_courbage@genevaassociation.org
18
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
FRIDAY, OCTOBER 22
WORK AND AGEING (IMPACT OF THE NEW AND FUTURE EU MEMBER STATES)
14.30 SESSION 7: Strategies for education and employment in the extended life cycle
Chair: Prof. Ivo Slaus, Member of the Croatian Parliament and of the Club of Rome
Prof. Mircea Malitza, President of the Black Sea University of Bucharest, and
Dr Elena Gheorgiu, University of Bucharest, The double Helix of Learning and Work,
Presentation and discussion a book published by UNESCO CEPES (Bucharest)
Prof. Flavio Pressacco, University of Udine, New employment strategies in the extended
life cycle: a non conventional multidisciplinary approach
+ to be confirmed
19
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
International Association
for the Study of Insurance Economics
"The Geneva Association"
20
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
Topics:
The Underlying Socio-Economic Forces Driving Liability Regime Change
The Extremes Of The Us Liability System: Causes And Consequences
Eurpean Dynamics Current Conditions And Emerging Risks In Europe
Actions And Remedies Within The Insurance Industries Control
Reflections On The 2004 Meeting And Outlook For The Annual Liability Regimes
Conference 2005
21
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
Speakers:
Julian Arkell, Knut Hohlfeld, Yoshihiro Kawai, Daniel Schant, Gunilla Borer, Hung Tran, Ernst Csiszar,
Ralph Vogelgesang, William C Marcoux, Marie-Louise Rossi, Wil Dullemond, Franois-Charles
Laprevote, Thomas Schubert,
Florence Lustman, Gerald Dickinson, Douglas Barnert, Nigel Masters, Prof. Jan Monciewicz, Stuart
Brahs, John Cooke, Ambassador Alejandro Jara, Franois-Charles Laprevote, Abdel-Hamid Mamdouh,
Bradley Smith
* * * * *
* * * * *
22
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
** * * *
The 11th Joint Seminar of the International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (the
Geneva Association) and the European Association of Law and Economics (EALE) will take place at the
German Institute for Economic Research (DIW) in Berlin on June 16-18, 2005.
The main topic of this seminar will be Risk Classification and Public Policy but any papers dealing with
the economics of law and insurance are invited. Special consideration will be given to papers that
address the issues of
Cross-sectional and international comparison of risk classification schemes, including non-
insurance branches such as solvency regulations (e.g., Basel II).
Purposes and limits of risk classification, including legal and public policy restrictions on risk
classification (e.g. ethnic and gender non-discrimination, privacy rights, equal access to credits).
Cost of benefits of risk classification, including theoretical and empirical studies of the effects of
risk classification on insurance prices and competition, welfare effects, and transaction costs.
Comparison of different instruments of risk classification, including efficacy and enforceability of
different schemes of risk classification (e.g., mutable and immutable characteristics, causational
and correlated factors, directly linked and indirect factors, use of genetic information, experience
rating etc).
Abstracts should be submitted by January 15, 2005 for review by a scientific board at the DIW Berlin.
Full papers are due by May 31, 2005. A selection of papers from the seminar will be invited for
publication in The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice.
The seminar is sponsored by The Geneva Association and the DIW Berlin.
Contact: Reimund Schwarze, DIW Berlin, Koenigin-Luise-Str. 4/5, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Tel: 0049 (0)30 8978 9297. E-mail: rschwarze@diw.de.
23
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
* * * * *
Insurers are using new methods to assess, categorize, price, reduce, and transfer risk.
Plenary sessions will feature experts from various segments of the industry, who will share their insights
on innovations and changes related to reinsurance, underwriting, ethics, and other important areas.
More details on the 2004 Annual Meeting will be provided on the ARIA Web site (http://www.aria.org/)
and in the next issue of ARIA News.
* * * * *
organised by
Korean Insurance Academic Society
Korea Risk Management Society
Korea Insurance Development Institute
24
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
* * * * *
The European Centre of Tort and Insurance Law (ECTIL) was founded in Vienna in 1999 with a two-fold
purpose: on the one hand, to create a secure institutional basis for the drafting of the Principles of
European Tort Law (Principles) which is undertaken by the European Group on Tort Law and, on the
other hand, to undertake research projects in the field of tort and insurance law.
The drafting of the Principles is the most extensive project of ECTIL. Academics were called together to
discuss the fundamental questions relating to tort law on a comparative basis, the aim of the research
being to create the foundation for discussing a future harmonisation of tort law in the EU. The work of the
European Group has already led to concrete results in the form of publications dealing with the issues of
Wrongfulness, Causation, Damages, Strict Liability, Liability for Damage caused by Others and
Contributory Negligence which are published by Kluwer Law International in the Unification of Tort Law
series. Forthcoming publications (2004) will deal with the issues of Multiple Tortfeasors and Fault. The
results of the General Part of the Principles were completed in April 2004 and are available on ECTILs
website (www.ectil.org). The Commentary to the Principles will appear at the beginning of 2005.
The work of ECTIL also encompasses comparative legal research studies, the results of which are
published in the Tort and Insurance Law series by Springer Publishing House. Detailed information on
these publications, which, among others, deal with the topics of Terror, No-Fault Compensation,
Environmental Liability, Medical Malpractice, Non-Pecuniary Loss, Pure Economic Loss, and Personal
Injury can be accessed at the website of ECTIL. The subjects of the research, which deal with relevant
issues for the insurance industry, are chosen due to their current significance and are often embarked
upon on the initiation of institutions who have a particular interest in a topic at the European level. ECTIL
also publishes a Yearbook on the developments of tort law in Europe in co-operation with the Research
Unit on European Tort Law of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (www.etl.oeaw.ac.at). The highlights of
the reports are presented and discussed at the Annual Conference on European Tort Law in Vienna.
The next conference will take place on 31 March and 1 April 2005.
Board of Directors: Michael Faure (Maastricht), Attila Fenyves (Vienna), Helmut Koziol (Vienna),
Ulrich Magnus (Hamburg), W. V. Horton Rogers (Nottingham)
* * * * *
25
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
Special Issue
IMPACT OF A FAIR VALUE FINANCIA REPORTING SYSTEM ON INSURANCE COMPANIES A SURVEY
This second report to The Geneva associations Accountancy Task Force provides an empirical analysis
of the views of insurance companies on the likely impact that an international financial reporting standard
based on a full fair value methodology, if it were to be introduced, would have on a mumber of their key
corporate policy areas.
26
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
* * * * *
27
The Geneva Association Insurance Economics N 50 / July 2004
International Association
for the Study of Insurance Economics
"The Geneva Association"
2004
September
20-22 Marseille The 31st Seminar of the European Group of Risk and Insurance
Economists (EGRIE)
October
14-15 New York 2nd Annual Round Table of Chief Risk Officers
15 Rome Montepaschi Vita Annual Forum 2004, 3rd Edition of the MPV Forum
The Paradigms of Value, Montepaschi Vita and The Geneva Association
21-22 Trieste 2nd Conference on Health and Ageing
25 Hanzhou Insurance Leaders Panel in China,
co-organized with the Asia Insurance Review
28-29 Zurich 2nd Conference on Liabilities and Legal Developments in Insurance,
hosted by Swiss Re, co-organised with Munich Re, RSA, SCOR and Zurich
Financial Services
November
4-5 Geneva 20th PROGRES Seminar on Regulation, Supervision and Global Trade
Issues
8-9 Bordeaux 19th M.O.R.E. Seminar at AXA University near Bordeaux
(Management of Risks in the Economy)
11-12 London 1st Geneva Association Insurance and Finance Conference,
hosted by Prudential Corp. Plc
19 Geneva Travailler jusqu 67 ans ou Retraite Flexible?
Organisation Uni 3 en collaboration avec lAssociation de Genve et Avenir
Suisse
December
1 Milan Insurance and International Financial Reporting Standards,
in cooperation with Macros Research
6-7 Zurich 2nd Meeting of the Global Insurance Communications Network,
co-organised with Zurich Financial Services
13-14 Paris 3rd Paris International Insurance Conference,
co-organized with the FFSA
2005
January
11 New York Joint Industry Forum for P&C Insurance Industry,
co-sponsored by The Geneva Association
28