Scribd Logo
Carica

Benvenuto in Scribd!

  • Bar Questions

    Caricato da

    Sandy Metran Avorque
    294 visualizzazioni2 pagine
    This document provides summaries of civil law topics from 1990 to 2006 arranged by year. It addresses a range of civil law issues including property relations, obligations, labor law, marriage and family law, succession, wills and estate planning. Each section lists a topic and year, followed by a brief suggested answer or responses to issues within that topic as they relate to the Philippine Civil Code and case law.

    Descrizione originale:

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Formati disponibili

    DOC, PDF, TXT o leggi online da Scribd

    Hai trovato utile questo documento?

    Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

    Segnala questo documento
    This document provides summaries of civil law topics from 1990 to 2006 arranged by year. It addresses a range of civil law issues including property relations, obligations, labor law, marriage and family law, succession, wills and estate planning. Each section lists a topic and year, followed by a brief suggested answer or responses to issues within that topic as they relate to the Philippine Civil Code and case law.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Scarica in formato DOC, PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
    Segnala contenuti inappropriati
    294 visualizzazioni2 pagine

    Bar Questions

    Caricato da

    Sandy Metran Avorque
    This document provides summaries of civil law topics from 1990 to 2006 arranged by year. It addresses a range of civil law issues including property relations, obligations, labor law, marriage and family law, succession, wills and estate planning. Each section lists a topic and year, followed by a brief suggested answer or responses to issues within that topic as they relate to the Philippine Civil Code and case law.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Scarica in formato DOC, PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
    Segnala contenuti inappropriati
    di 2

    CIVIL

    CIVILLAW
    CIVIL
    LAW Answers
    LAW toto
    Answers the
    Answers BAR
    the theas
    toBAR Arranged
    BAR
    as byby
    Arranged Topics
    as Arranged (Year
    Topics
    by Topics 1990-2006)
    (Year
    (Year
    1990-2006)
    1990-2006)

    appropriate the building after proper


    indemnity. The parties shall agree upon the
    terms of the lease and in case of
    disagreement, the court fix the terms thereof.
    Article 977 of the Civil Code provides that heirs

    ANSWERS TO BAR who repudiate their share cannot be


    represented.

    EXAMINATION QUESTIONS
    (iii) If the husband discovers after the
    marriage that his wife has been a prostitute
    IN
    before they got married.
    SUGGESTED
    Marriage;ANSWER:
    Psychological
    Incapacity
    SUGGESTED (1996)
    ANSWER:

    CIVIL LAW
    • The requirement of a 16-year difference
    between the age of the adopter and adoptee
    may be waived when the adopter is the SUGGESTED ANSWER:
    biological
    SUGGESTED
    SUGGESTED parent of the adoptee or is the spouse
    ANSWER:
    ANSWER:
    of the adoptee’s parent;

    "Art. 1700. The relations between SUGGESTED ANSWER:


    Property Relations;
    capital Obligations;
    and labor are not Benefit
    merely
    of the contractual.
    Family (2000)They are so impressed with
    Paternity & Filiation; Common-
    public interest that labor contracts must
    Law Union (2004)
    yield to the common good. Therefore,
    such contracts are subject to the
    special laws on labor unions, collective
    bargaining, strikes and lockouts, closed Parental Authority; Special Parental
    SUGGESTED ANSWER:
    shop, wages, working conditions, hours Heirs; Intestate
    Authority; Heirs;
    Liability Reserva (2003)
    of Teachers
    United States where the ranch is located.
    of labor and similar subjects." Troncal (1995)
    (Optional Addendum: In the foregoing cases, when
    the foreign law would apply, the absence of proof of
    SUGGESTED ANSWER: that foreign law would render Philippine law
    3) Drug addiction arises during the
    SUGGESTED ANSWER: applicable under the "eclectic theory".)
    marriage and not at the time of marriage. SUGGESTED ANSWER:

    d) As Judge, I shall rule as follows: Jorge is


    entitled toANSWER:
    SUGGESTED receive his legitime from the estate
    (iii) If the husband discovers after the marriage
    of his wife. He was not disinherited in the will
    that his wifeCondition;
    Donations; was a prostitute before they got
    Capacity
    SUGGESTED ANSWER: even assuming that he gave ground for
    married,
    to Sue (1996) hence, he is stillremedy.
    he has no No
    disinheritance, entitled to his
    misrepresentation
    SUGGESTED ANSWER: or deceit as to character,
    legitime. Jorge, however, cannot receive
    health, rank, fortune or chastity shall constitute
    anything from the free portion. He cannot claim
    fraud as legal ground
    Proceedings; for an action for the
    SUGGESTED as he Intestate
    preteritionANSWER: Proceedings;
    is not a compulsory heir in the
    annulment
    Jurisdiction
    Marriage; of marriage
    (2004) (Article 46 FC).
    direct line. DivorceThere Decrees;
    being no Filiation
    preterition, the
    of
    What Children
    SUGGESTED
    institution
    Equity of (2005)
    entries
    ANSWER:in sister
    the
    follows the
    the Civil Registry
    was valid mayonly
    and the be
    Paternity & Filiation; Artificial
    changed
    right (2003)
    Law or corrected
    of Jorge is to claimwithout a judicial order?
    his legitime.
    Insemination; Formalities(2006)
    (2.5%)
    Effect of Obiter & Dissenting Opinion; Wills; Revocation of Wills; Dependent
    1 The prejudicial question must be
    SUGGESTED
    SC ANSWER:
    Decisions (1994) Relative Revocation (2003)
    determinative of the case before the court. SUGGESTED ANSWER:
    2 Jurisdiction
    POSSIBLE to try said question must be
    ADDITIONAL ANSWERS:
    lodged in another tribunal. SUGGESTED ANSWER:
    ADDITIONAL ANSWER:
    9 OctoberANSWER:
    SUGGESTED 1985. 139 SCRA
    206).
    CIVIL
    C
    CIVIL
    CIVIL VL CIVIL
    C LAW
    LAW LAW V LAnswers LAW
    Answers Answers
    Answe Answers
    Answe toto sthe to
    the oBAR the
    sheBAR to oas BAR the heas Arranged BAR
    Arrangedas A Arranged as by anged Arranged
    Aby Topics
    Topics anged by(Year Topics
    Top by
    (Year cs
    Topics
    Top
    1990-2006) (Year
    Year
    cs (Year
    1990-2006) Year
    1990-2006)
    1990
    Family
    Heirs;
    Easements;
    Defense; 1990-2006)
    1990
    Leasee 2006 Intestate
    Home; 2006 Due Nature & Right Lessor;
    Diligence
    Dwelling Heirs; of ofWay; Contracts;Rights
    Reserva House
    in Requisites Selection and
    (1994) Troncal Relativity
    Obligations (1996) (1995) of
    a) Definition;
    separation
    but
    spe
    father
    that
    Under
    protect
    Somet
    ch
    drug
    2.
    The
    ext
    After
    (a)
    h
    to
    homestead
    occupant
    property
    prescr
    Dec
    a
    1)
    Yes.
    purchaser
    then
    const
    Sa
    not
    SUGGESTED
    ALTERNAT f
    ur
    t sconsu
    enat
    "Proh
    s the
    vador
    (a)
    dup
    ddren
    where
    ngu
    depend
    never
    name,
    ade
    c pub
    DiscussThe
    cang,
    add executed
    thetutes
    wea pt
    Art.
    meX
    The
    was
    There
    se
    on.on shed
    m
    catb s
    ted,
    oncapac
    VE borrowed
    based
    on
    death
    ct.
    property
    c cons
    -known
    t
    v against
    er-owner
    thereof
    for
    ANSWER of
    {Rublicopresumpt
    16ve
    poThe
    on
    n
    the
    sso
    ANSWERthe
    Reg
    an
    a of
    forum
    from
    Efforts
    and
    what
    these
    by
    b the
    1990,
    candamages
    F
    par.
    e
    the cy,
    gned e property
    ty,
    anof
    aws
    undue
    of
    ondeed
    contract
    ster
    the
    y p maru r Y,
    h
    to statutory
    theaff
    reg
    aches.
    on
    be
    wou
    no
    as
    and
    the
    money
    ghts
    1,to vs.non-conveniens;
    nature
    mreg
    ethe
    Sarah,
    Xc concern
    effect the
    nveof dav
    the NCC,
    have
    a
    of
    app
    d
    marr
    no
    stered
    n
    c anymore
    fact
    d nterference
    strat
    ms,
    Orellanast
    may
    t
    for
    Deeds
    th
    of
    agreed
    e sa
    P for
    zen,
    your
    weg
    t neasement
    ements
    More
    ngu
    froms
    eyes
    cat
    F h
    of ed
    rea
    that
    born offa
    100,000.00
    law.
    —
    e quest
    th
    t on
    ng
    ur
    m aof
    g p
    mes
    s des on
    was
    Zshed
    Ph s
    so
    v ega sd ure
    rehab
    no
    shathe
    deemed
    Ythus,
    ofproperty
    purchase
    the
    30 and
    than
    persons,
    ng
    because
    a
    (Toyota
    the orreason
    sha
    andbe
    stance
    on
    ct
    the
    pp F
    SCRA of
    aborers,
    made
    debtor
    wh
    of w
    adv
    sa from
    on
    they
    over
    obv
    your
    not
    prem
    nemere
    pthe
    gave
    serv
    th
    52coulong-
    be
    tated
    e
    ch
    divorce that
    no thece n
    to fy
    ouswh
    the
    Motor
    511;nc
    h
    begot
    aw
    s d
    pr
    the
    capac
    years
    to
    abut
    dent
    court,
    shou
    sed
    but
    sybea
    sub
    sregarded
    the
    persons
    uded
    the
    were
    ce
    ch usufruct.
    contract
    p
    refer
    ca
    governs
    not
    transfer
    r to
    aestate.
    he
    ght
    ece
    ect
    n
    act
    as
    d
    so
    ed
    n
    ty
    court
    Ubudans
    have
    Phil.under
    (a)
    1.
    Mar
    country
    to
    Are
    Adm
    na
    Court Family;
    d
    abso
    persons
    3.
    natura
    s
    sexua
    F
    there
    cons
    share
    thereof
    Sa
    res
    Cesar
    requ
    the
    The
    answer
    Th
    any
    property
    cond
    and
    (b)Art.
    h
    the
    he atter
    nfu
    be
    on
    for
    ster.
    or on
    to
    of
    s1989,
    The
    t
    n
    ona
    ma vador,
    s An
    VThe
    dentob
    me.
    thes
    payment
    r
    and act nred
    stent
    ute
    t ght
    then
    vacate
    a
    Sec.
    bought
    act
    s
    age
    ofy ons
    Thus,
    on
    civil
    dy-transm
    stratgatmortgage
    mother
    or
    and
    rheo
    a
    The of
    on
    As
    otted
    str
    a
    V
    MarsConstitutional
    to
    commun
    of
    ght
    Appeals to of
    a
    degree
    on
    he,show
    rg
    governed
    wh
    detr
    w returned
    7(b)
    yon.
    Tomas
    action
    does
    exp
    commerc
    ZY,
    mortbut
    veoffer
    recover
    Eva under
    conc th
    s,
    andmber
    of
    for
    theatach o
    by However,
    a
    Codementa
    has
    on
    th
    redempt
    res
    of
    ore
    gage were
    up
    usass
    he reconveyance
    pass
    not they
    F
    prem
    sng
    of
    (G.R aw
    contract
    involves
    sRA8552.
    onty
    her.Constitutional
    of concess
    wbthe
    bus
    ssue on
    dent
    beyond
    ru
    Pr
    pregu
    to
    possess
    prescr
    by e
    sof
    sha amount
    fe the
    to
    a
    marr
    ngno are
    No. m the
    ntado
    hae,d the
    ses
    to
    above-c
    re
    ness
    ,1987
    nvo may
    the the asease,
    on
    dd
    the
    cwhereMandates;
    ndustr
    Dpersona
    ar
    nothe
    mburse
    c104235,
    ved date
    tgna
    Ph
    condom
    and
    executed
    an
    ed The
    be.
    ona
    what
    tty
    and
    zen,
    e
    fCivil
    awgrows,
    ba1998
    on
    has
    act
    whzens.
    ng
    nder
    sofmora
    name.
    issue
    to
    nd to
    sowhpp aga
    W
    de
    a of
    ted
    found
    of
    Supreme
    re,
    the
    ofa the
    toon
    chmarr
    heeach
    a
    chthe
    sue
    hend
    th
    ,B
    neshs
    propert
    reg
    Barn so
    ver
    S1
    bu
    orn
    prov
    nstthe
    proh
    omay
    Nov. was
    d
    similar
    for
    we
    nce
    sequ
    1trespect
    cate
    The
    nce
    by M record
    umheto
    stance
    anat
    s
    3to
    edother
    and
    stered
    Exam
    tthe
    Huey
    mrstand
    need
    evokeO,
    -be
    awson
    hear
    recover
    brought
    the
    sty
    be
    b
    gh
    10, on
    the
    Court
    unher
    Court
    ona
    cont
    on,es
    ar
    ts same of
    or
    n
    h
    fser
    o ng Pesos.
    phrase
    the
    andto
    at
    nat
    1993)nrto
    s
    a
    boss
    for
    ng,
    offsfrom
    ng
    he n
    and ty,
    nu
    the
    of has
    a
    ot
    ous
    the
    nons.
    use
    to
    tdoes
    the
    ,ty
    athe
    cers the
    sand
    H
    "by
    eresof
    of
    rs
    TableFORWARD
    of Contents
    Contracts
    (1990)
    (2003) (2002) ......................................................................................................
    ..........................................................................................................................
    .............................................................................................................
    ...............................................................................................................
    ................................................................................................................
    ......................................................................................................... 4463Heirs; Ejectment 98 24 112
    Intestate Leasee; Family; Suit
    Filing Heirs;
    vs. Death 82
    ofCancellation Separate Rescission
    Shares Thereof; Mandates; Effectsof
    Title Action; Contracts; (2005) (1997)
    Divorce
    Need for
    dea
    for
    216
    45 1)
    our
    obtained Eva
    Ramon
    husband
    arm
    success
    P
    d
    unsuccessfu
    easement
    (4)
    However,
    ch
    reg
    prescr
    of
    ha
    e
    rec
    w
    act
    other
    fto
    1)
    understand
    act:
    can
    by
    recorded
    S
    2191
    cons
    und
    be?
    and
    has
    cert
    one-
    a
    reasons.
    trust
    the
    Ro
    CA
    vs.
    nu
    SUGGESTED aw
    n
    nterest
    and a
    nterested
    uan No,
    apsed
    sregard
    thdrawa
    ready
    ed
    nce t
    enter
    actsfthe
    the
    NCC.
    dren,
    nt
    on
    What
    then
    and
    sance
    SCRA amata)
    stersmay
    Courts.
    former
    tpro-
    ofng
    as
    converge.
    Gil v
    (a)
    f
    SCRA s
    anstatute
    ustrated
    can
    dered e factors
    ffs
    cate
    an
    ded the
    bed
    for
    rea
    the may
    orw ahas
    t
    secur
    ona
    appropr
    n to
    from
    nd
    17). fdepends
    argument
    onD,
    nto
    th
    s Mot
    resc
    becho
    the
    natura and
    property,
    ANSWER
    236 by e
    ascomp
    country
    owner
    of
    (Cada
    may
    vs
    party
    ng,
    ............................................................................................................. E
    s
    reg
    the of
    .beracqu
    ......................................................................................................................... an
    outs
    so (1994)
    pass
    contracts
    Can
    the
    ty
    Asprov
    Proper Party (1996) ..............................................................................................................
    (1991)
    (2003)
    Reservation (2003) by
    a on
    corrected
    her
    ghts.
    property
    ce
    and ss
    [1992]).
    Sonny300 that
    correspond
    vu
    ............................................................................................................................
    ......................................................................................................... act
    stered
    share.
    ate
    doctr by yto
    on
    zed of
    de
    by
    Zalameabered
    Baby
    nnformat
    nve
    d on
    sF. w
    nerab
    does D
    where on
    hectares
    v. furthermore,
    scovery
    onof
    way
    and forum
    the
    ...................................................................................... c
    wr th After
    wh
    Amer whether
    nesm the
    const
    POEA.
    v Pac
    and for
    the
    ofhas
    and
    askh
    t notdebtor’s
    person
    or
    e, ss
    e
    of
    those
    ng, s
    the
    of reg
    on f
    v. ng
    tmar
    the
    deed
    can ega
    theand
    been
    for
    and
    haveshou
    the
    coho
    tuted
    changed
    mortgage.
    of
    Forum
    Lulu 238 s se
    aga
    sett
    Court stry or annu
    had
    d death
    s
    c wh ta
    deedthe
    atter separat
    transfer
    and
    cho
    nmpaby
    er
    of
    t d
    not
    tuated.
    true,
    suppressed
    the
    SCRA
    A nst ngwhose
    zen,
    in chnot
    duty
    a on
    (Anton
    cond
    and
    was sa
    non
    of acqu
    ment
    cew not BLo
    ega
    rment
    ofs because
    y
    of
    forthon
    have
    Canada. e
    thandbe
    Appealsng act of on
    X,
    of
    nce
    t
    ta
    reg
    S n ys
    on
    n ofwas
    ona
    sa
    ro),
    nce
    par
    was t
    ve,
    the
    herandon
    aw.
    ght
    of by
    of
    the
    forve
    str e.n a es that
    related
    Supreme
    sha
    an
    g
    of
    does
    emp
    w
    Art
    va
    mode
    gua
    has
    not
    intimately
    marr
    c
    redempt
    and
    act dona
    A.
    w
    ch wo
    Divorce
    (2).
    concern
    appears
    warehouse
    former.
    purposes,
    The
    R
    ten-year
    vo nd
    possess
    h
    chance
    My
    capac
    Germany
    ru
    Eva
    street
    product
    on
    Perc
    Roxas ven
    ghway
    ohnson,
    whatever
    H
    reg
    contract
    under
    cannot kewv of
    se
    th
    egh
    dedcoun
    dab
    yA
    onAmer
    anccates
    unde
    w
    en
    answer
    thehe
    stry
    63
    on
    Wmortgage
    there
    n npub
    s
    a oyees
    vae
    Co.
    ceremonynot
    eeand
    age
    havebeby and
    th2016
    conveyances
    ac
    means
    seon
    ty
    or
    112orsthe
    quaC
    24d
    Ejectmente
    he es Petron
    sho
    he ng
    Hong
    proper
    veand
    ng
    styto
    Howcan
    prescr
    on ne
    reconveyance
    the
    ge
    (1991) shou
    contract
    ncurab
    and
    governed
    on
    respect
    sher
    aw
    he
    98
    Marriage; and
    sha os
    success
    s
    Fortuitous nCourt
    wfof
    estransact
    where
    severa
    n by
    ha
    force eback
    theno
    of
    Kong
    edhe
    Option c
    hadtsd
    to the
    acc
    198O.
    Suit; pa
    nhe app
    Pub
    on
    tto
    the
    does
    mov
    not a
    remedy,
    ce face
    ptbe
    zen,
    coup
    to
    45
    of aw
    equaohe
    e.
    denissue
    aw d
    pa yto
    refused
    Des
    y es he
    adopt
    ebrated
    official
    Annulment;
    Event; to
    Commodatum
    ca
    government
    s mortgagor
    ve he
    O
    Intestateapp
    CTwo
    be
    caseso
    because
    co
    nce
    bythe
    es
    eddeemed
    proh
    byons
    Buy;d25 sde
    Fe v
    n
    app
    n sha
    82 per
    n der
    mean
    wt processes
    the for
    n M
    1984,
    n e
    quest
    ease
    Tokyo
    den
    wou
    precedents.
    Mechanical ed
    hv(2)
    raised
    Code
    French
    becauseprpe
    t
    ca mb
    be
    V nvo
    oanodto
    o
    onthe
    ng
    that
    purchas
    Expired
    Successionane
    nvo
    ng
    same
    Effects; t
    ce
    onva
    cky.
    n
    d years
    the
    shou
    ng
    possess
    1987
    appa vacate
    Pesos
    on
    an prov
    Ph
    o
    (2006)whenheto
    Cebu
    have F for
    vdpr the
    o f ves
    whennfrom
    or o
    sng
    unexpec
    he
    and an
    en
    It she
    Defectsin
    d de
    cover
    nt
    a
    Requisitesany
    she
    as pp
    aw.
    and
    is and
    d
    fu
    Huey after
    ng ded
    vorce
    easemen
    was same?
    prescr property
    saswedd
    not
    a
    espec
    FamC ngbeo
    thethe
    Const
    gn ne
    and
    eg
    purchas
    ncumben
    to h . con
    onh
    edssuccess
    husband
    ifthe
    ty
    (2002) The stores
    theHe
    byof
    cance
    such
    pa yneeded
    dden
    offeredthe
    on
    d
    damages.tsp
    ed
    bed
    Beforecriminal
    Code the
    s
    ngmate
    suga
    10,000
    scove
    en
    Court aw
    an ace
    aw
    moved
    nExp
    tut y va
    ust
    r ega
    suponon he w s
    andthe
    ng
    hyed
    on ad, a s n n.
    GENERAL PRINCIPLES
    to
    name
    (2%)The
    At
    granted.
    762) at
    the
    prescr
    OPT
    shou
    mutua
    reference
    (b)
    status
    the
    Therefore
    property.
    marr
    corporea
    Sect
    ch
    w
    Because
    de
    same
    1950.
    coasta
    her
    h
    sa
    contro
    conven
    Amer
    defects
    SUGGESTED
    ANOTHER
    ALTERNAT
    (2001)
    Remarriage
    (1992)
    Pet
    ssth re
    theth east
    pendens
    e, dren
    (228
    t
    grounds
    ONAL
    freedom
    the
    cto. yd
    express
    property
    re
    the
    on
    on
    sp
    age, warehouse
    can rtpt .be
    or
    on
    and
    OBLIGATIONS
    po respect
    ease
    former
    usDec
    44,
    ens?ob18
    waters
    ofs
    ANSWER
    for
    Art
    metes
    VE
    SCRA
    (1990) on,
    EXTENDED
    the capac
    of
    H nt
    so
    the
    reg
    or
    the
    to
    husband
    ANSWER damages.
    ectand
    theyears
    mmovab
    PD
    ANSWERS
    ANSWER cof
    annotated
    de.
    to y and
    adv
    the
    ..........................................................................................................................
    .............................................................................................................
    rev
    n
    annotat
    ega
    from
    other
    face
    2) ePh
    stered. pNo. s
    23
    ew
    tof
    sexua
    agreed
    and
    pub 236
    (Art
    ty
    (5%)
    the me,
    ay
    nstrumentsed.
    What because
    ......................................................................................................................................... fsoseparat
    ANSWER
    nherent
    ...................................................................................................................................... ppof
    the wh
    1529.
    srst
    [1993])
    of
    dcex
    tuated
    bounds
    and
    Tom, a
    c
    ...........................................................................of essuance
    not the
    the
    X
    e
    on
    ne
    The at
    W .ch
    on
    cthenf
    st
    order,135
    and cannot
    property,
    betweenen the
    sty.
    The
    of
    Court
    determ fde
    Torrens
    ng the
    n of
    Torrens
    ,on?n Fam
    the
    aoy the
    ed sPer
    (4),
    of
    other
    or nta trecords.
    ty
    second t"of
    pub aches
    me
    parents
    basketba
    the
    person
    Exp
    sathe c
    anot
    tshou
    act
    ong of
    Art yese,new
    ned
    theathe
    petCert Code
    Caro
    words,
    cover
    system
    no cm
    her
    ot
    aconstruct
    on cPh
    ce ega
    .........................................................................................................................................................
    Decree of
    d on
    n.
    arm
    tpoeby
    sothe
    marr
    aw
    TCTs
    part
    wh
    fProv
    on husband
    101,
    easement
    not
    of
    does
    prosper?
    fa
    cate asthe
    ppasserts
    d ng.cy exthe revy
    of
    ground e
    nwas
    ed
    bees
    appght
    ages
    nes,
    ded,
    to
    thepart
    theof
    the
    andnot
    oconng toX
    ny sof hav Ph
    2.
    ch
    action,
    recovery
    bas
    ceremony
    r(2%)
    defect
    vo
    fam
    necessary
    d
    and
    accord
    ALTERNAT
    SUGGESTED
    he
    but
    an
    he
    he amoun
    Labo
    easemen
    Thenhe
    tproperty
    on
    by
    where
    partnersh
    Marv
    marr
    w
    were nto mber
    strengthen
    teach
    nnocent
    es 24
    succeeded
    sha
    ghts app
    rect pp
    thout
    amen
    has e
    the
    umes
    the
    except
    dng be
    sw the
    turning
    112
    Marriage;
    0
    aws
    n
    ynes can
    25
    aw
    adopted
    nage,
    acqu
    th
    sfe
    y
    ng
    been
    e
    n
    needed
    and
    or
    government
    ground
    a and
    ngforArt.
    or
    oThus
    ovresolution
    M
    un
    yact
    Liability;
    p by
    ew
    way
    of
    respect
    pre
    aside
    are
    e
    of osuccess
    purchaser
    from
    VE
    edp obnchoate
    p on.
    whce
    to
    ANSWER
    63
    he
    on
    pbe
    sh
    nc
    ndt,
    schoo
    the
    ANSWER
    Annulment;
    ng ov a
    howeve
    may
    ove
    property.
    16,
    nterests
    ons
    damages
    ed ud
    requ
    the Pesos
    he
    ebrated
    but
    n ch
    fromby
    pment.
    Under
    dent
    Extra-Judicial
    she
    pa
    that
    thethe
    rectmore
    Airline
    ons e en
    wa
    w
    fam be ona
    NCC).
    ab
    Canada,
    ph
    cebased
    o
    her
    took
    theto
    forma hve acqu
    somehow
    s
    red
    Such
    ase
    Whenwou
    we
    textbooks.
    money
    bank.
    he
    re
    as
    y of
    the
    of main
    for Fe
    ght
    to
    gh
    yany
    than
    Company;
    Grounds Art
    and
    he
    sd
    natura
    for
    n 98of
    p ned
    accord
    The
    toAd
    ownersh
    as45
    ssue for
    ques
    sM
    nva
    on gh
    such
    pub sus
    usufruct
    va sa
    ace
    topictnhwh
    Sublease
    Partition; c
    oby
    B sd
    adopt
    ten
    ha
    no sncon
    damages
    es e
    property
    an
    Intestate
    es
    wr aC
    breach
    for
    sact
    ue.
    he
    pand
    and
    n n
    tsaof
    br
    on
    ch
    he
    16
    oncof
    (10) esc
    uz Tthe
    refather
    Non-Performance
    no ng
    nstng
    as
    issue
    tten
    nm
    ssupport.
    Sup
    serv
    on
    ef, ove
    no
    ght
    The
    he
    d pyears
    may
    was
    10
    p.
    Phof
    she
    Fraud
    nvo
    o
    oed
    not.
    vs. Csnsbon
    Succession
    mean
    to
    case the
    tutn
    s
    to
    hownt
    eg
    the
    ved
    cb
    gh nd
    she
    contracts
    of ce.
    co
    forher
    October
    so
    proper
    Assignment
    They
    n
    pp
    va
    eto
    not
    to to
    apanese
    annu
    accepted.
    sng
    The
    on?
    y, ng ev
    determines
    warehouse
    contract
    a
    n d
    a
    theNCC
    d dence
    ocollateral
    was
    was
    w neuse, he
    favor
    breach
    each
    by w
    go
    by
    ter
    hon
    y oa oca
    gsof d
    acase
    ven house
    the
    you
    aw,
    san
    Absen
    nhe
    vorce
    the asafter
    of one
    oke
    haof ed
    thenof
    ao 83
    B.
    The
    Hernando
    T
    not
    c) a)
    adhered
    vestedIgnorance
    amended
    the
    and
    of
    FC).
    however,
    contractus
    Ph
    the
    may
    reg
    executed
    stated.
    carr
    and
    property
    vest,
    comp
    Exp
    ANOTHER
    SUGGESTED
    statute"?
    Reg
    re
    Civil
    ALTERNAT
    Lease;
    (1991)
    (1997)
    (1990)
    Obligation atter W
    tgoodThe
    Rosar
    eedpdes d
    strat
    stpp
    a She
    ed
    the
    ona nda’s
    prerogat
    and
    Ybe ace
    Aleatory the
    law vorce
    n.
    yapu
    Rescission
    r
    supon
    who
    ne ownersh
    Bart
    Agned c
    over
    const
    mere
    ANSWER
    (2004)
    to
    o.
    may
    enate
    won
    VEto
    and
    at
    Tr a
    by
    where
    that s
    contract
    ANSWER
    customs
    house
    vs. th
    awc
    but m
    mortgage
    an dthe
    of
    Ramon
    on
    a
    ANSWERofnot
    are
    and s
    aRepub
    veto
    for a
    ordered
    spense not
    tuted
    y m
    the
    Court
    Common s
    the
    app by no nso
    orso
    extra
    sh
    .........................................................................................................................correct.
    p not
    to
    acqu
    the
    Car that
    the
    nnocent
    quest
    deny
    of
    .........................................................................................................................................
    ........................................................................................................................... va
    over
    rfserv
    exe
    ........................................................................
    of Contract s Law
    ngtake
    correct for
    transfer
    es. correct.
    c
    eof
    on s possess
    new
    d
    osprom
    sha w
    prostitutionudred,
    apatr d.
    her
    theanActanoneng the
    by
    (a)
    The
    rent
    a
    th
    on.
    reacted
    Makat
    (2005) vs.Art
    Ph
    custody
    contract
    cne action
    usufructTorrens
    mmovab
    6809,
    tcance
    the
    a(c)
    ae.
    the Pangas
    her
    purchasers
    on
    ssory
    who
    testateru
    notc Assum
    pp
    ownershon e for 637ne husband
    prov
    of for be T
    et..............................................................................
    the
    ,part
    need
    must
    cket
    ereg n hadby of at h
    note former
    d
    wh tthe nan
    the
    sstrat
    son aw
    e
    that
    tong
    B
    was
    ex
    on
    dof
    commt gn
    nvo e
    desby
    ng.
    name,
    pch not the
    for
    of nqu
    adopt that
    does
    re cover
    parce
    fy
    and
    rendered andof
    on, of nature
    ve
    the
    ssued,
    ssng nf
    vaNew
    of
    supon
    tted
    not
    re the
    she
    the
    was
    and
    tae
    ost not
    the
    the
    the
    and
    onueng a by
    Contracts; a 112b) mThe
    whether
    carr
    and
    subsequent
    government
    aware
    ALTERNAT
    of
    recourse
    she
    reg subjects:
    Marriage;
    2)
    B.
    contract
    w
    capac
    1988,
    wou
    Cata
    Condom
    can
    same
    aws.
    1989,s
    answer dd
    a
    them
    Liability;Would
    stratsDo be equ
    not
    age
    marr d facts
    furn
    ot.
    e Dav
    One
    no a
    Bethe
    tyexp
    shenst
    of the
    name,
    on nst
    must
    Airline
    ty
    dissenting of
    capac
    nThe
    for
    of
    sa
    VE ture
    ed s d
    or
    tuted
    yearshow
    um
    app
    and re
    your of
    Grounds;
    tuted.Const
    persons
    ANSWER
    for compand/or
    d
    y ent
    opt
    thefor
    her don not
    mortgageredempt
    defeat
    pr
    be her
    Company; factory
    Cert
    Lou opinion
    scovered
    tate
    ed
    ssuance
    25 63 on.
    ater, that
    tformer
    nonpayment
    y nt
    reason
    n qua
    answer 99
    Marriage; aedtut
    a)
    mother
    on 1977,
    for
    Hidden e ng the
    2
    nt f Fe W
    n
    to
    Sublease; h
    cate
    W the
    affirms
    to
    ona
    1 ohnson
    f
    and
    o the
    of45contract.
    Non-Performance transact
    owned
    s th
    ed goon
    Declarationsa une
    c
    Treasure an a
    that
    sha
    r need
    criminal
    that
    or
    C the
    ght
    s to
    assmate
    be
    Annulment;
    Intestate was orrto
    po
    the
    of
    after
    O and s overrules
    ght
    surname.
    e 1998
    Cadopt
    Delay
    d
    government
    even
    of
    thedefense
    her
    t cy
    returned
    thereto.
    T
    beTremarry
    by
    (1995)
    for
    fferent
    payment
    ons
    granted
    D, t s After
    any
    Dewey
    Succession ofne in on
    husband
    theNARRAM
    when
    same
    Judicial of m
    f
    the Va a
    action
    years way
    cover
    Paymentnnvo
    you
    antax,w
    claim,
    of
    ncentthe
    ted prWhat
    h der
    from
    prosper?
    aw
    name
    Gambling Th to Nullity:
    because
    for
    Obligations Manue
    ntv fee
    were
    if of right
    n
    fam
    after
    orto
    s
    ng
    hof
    ng ofng r
    may
    theyX
    o th
    s hersght
    the
    the
    oror
    thefor
    the
    of sy
    such o
    good
    obligation. he eg
    oes une
    s a eab
    Itredempt cons
    neither ewh chs e ngdoes
    disposes s
    o he he no c nor0ea u 5 e M
    awards du
    ou yon de o ha be he
    anything sha
    a Land e o e itonReg n merely en he s abso
    ona a on u e
    the
    prov
    C
    (1%)The
    No,
    (d)
    under
    acqu
    th
    The
    further,
    fraud Reg
    2.
    1)
    second
    Mistake
    Is
    was
    b
    adverse
    (b)
    Can
    ANOTHER
    ALTERNAT
    SUGGESTED
    declaration
    change
    on
    corporea
    operate
    aforestated
    the
    BUYER
    render
    not
    under
    fadv
    of n v a)uan
    there
    gamous
    nancerd
    rrespectArt
    y
    the The
    There
    where
    ce
    neffect strat
    sthe
    sa
    rproperty
    Code
    at
    fo de
    nonpayment
    throughsFORUM
    paragraph
    Ro
    exerc or
    ng Art.
    c(1994)
    of
    mtthesow
    e
    the
    brob
    contract
    east
    e ve
    anyfor
    except
    of to
    m act
    and
    ANSWERVE ve
    noron.
    success
    ofof
    because
    can prov
    company
    16
    rngs
    that s
    ve415
    marrng
    ANSWER
    nat gatANSWER
    srepresentat
    cut-off
    these
    ght
    sea. on
    absothe
    Fact
    pendens.
    atter
    property A
    NON
    prescr
    difference
    of18 of
    preva
    death
    ch sbeare
    of an
    ona on
    (1) remedy
    des
    when w
    fage
    ts yearsndefeas
    that
    nullity
    passengers
    The
    the
    by d s
    noona
    sand
    ute
    he (1996)
    actbound
    the
    or
    of ocats
    CONVEN
    b
    and
    he of tthat
    ty,ptwh not
    varnd
    sabroad. "noth
    usufruct
    tthe
    extsued
    the
    on d
    covero
    The
    es
    her
    s on.
    rrequrby the
    age,in
    assertedon
    ty express
    ghts
    ghte
    awsd,d.
    vorce.
    ng the
    of
    on prosper.
    b
    ngu
    notdebt
    aga
    May partyA
    their
    theby
    ndefeas
    snotThe
    e
    then
    and
    mereunder
    proper
    ng
    the sof
    and ENS
    ex n to
    status
    ster, themare
    owner
    and
    tes
    are
    shover
    nst 1,
    agreeab the
    redempt
    ceon n
    marr
    atter death
    Ph B
    legal
    how add
    she
    concerned
    oc
    or thus
    the yy1970.governed
    th
    so s
    prescr
    aof
    the
    tnat3prov
    The
    Hongkong
    mprescr
    bvenue
    an a of
    pp
    se
    contract
    engaged
    me
    or years
    rtage
    contractu
    F may
    fore.ts pr
    seffect
    ho on
    sCode of
    ghtthe
    onasex ne
    ownersh
    no
    easement.
    UDGMENT
    p
    e ded
    act
    bus
    pendens
    by
    udgments A D,nc
    onbed
    ds
    na.the be
    to f113
    spec of h
    person
    of s X,
    of
    Ep
    onger
    ason
    courts
    to the after
    hasby
    pt
    sha
    ness
    the n
    son
    e
    gher
    any
    by
    and
    Can ost
    suchthehe
    co for
    fnnp
    bthe e Yes,
    A.
    rof
    caw soughtApplicable
    Naturalization
    (a)
    proceed.
    SUGGESTED
    not
    Mep
    nat
    port
    the
    1,000
    other
    own
    damages tshe
    wh
    wou tght
    Annulment:
    (2)
    and
    case?
    and
    cons
    property.
    Reason.
    compensat
    Canad ames
    engagedkew ace(2).
    e vchway
    ch sfnand
    proh
    ve
    "mirror
    execut tooErn
    ron
    d of
    the
    derat the
    dWhy
    the
    where
    vo
    pub
    se Mrs.
    have
    Nevada,
    yproperty
    has
    were
    ght an Sa
    (2/3) e
    arose
    (3%)
    a b Fe sa
    umes,
    by byand on
    cview
    F cou
    ANSWER
    ted
    vador
    c or ZY
    prov
    aUnknown
    to on ttreached
    on e
    Dpe Laws;
    principle
    the
    charge.
    sexua
    not
    reason
    zensh
    p wh 0Legal
    for
    b)to
    why ofscannot
    ds25
    from
    asno fromand
    were
    Pr su
    adoptc
    son.
    sWhat theuan
    contract
    a
    ch
    the
    or h on ose
    not?
    ntado
    governed
    cSublease; s ted
    owed.
    the sp. tmayWills
    he
    y-transm
    the
    of EQU
    sher
    h the
    optboth
    counse
    zen. a
    The fto
    Separation:
    va arethe
    that
    sthe or
    va
    nherent of e 30th
    assurance on
    a d?
    ma
    be TY
    was
    ffa
    actua
    After
    a)the
    h
    fo
    Eva'sthe dpathway
    vncreased
    so Few
    fraudu ssu
    executed g
    m,ay by
    Was
    ? OF
    fTreasures
    or marr
    ssf(1997)
    ow bfa pso,
    ven, ta
    Torrens
    executed.
    essent
    obta
    nna
    otted rthday
    ty the
    nos
    b to
    REDEMPT
    yHs
    rm
    ng ,e
    the what
    dsa
    ent used
    age
    to ghrecover
    and
    the Separation
    pstockho
    fund.ned
    d
    ty at
    aw
    year,
    illegitimate product
    toperform
    e, a
    sease system
    and
    use
    oSeparation;
    marr h
    w
    the
    RB for
    hasssnsse
    of
    the sththe
    and
    she ON
    that
    the cwhat
    that
    ageof t9and.
    der. othe non
    me Co. aC s
    Law
    How
    Rentals
    Declaration
    (1998)
    (2005) (1997)
    would
    (2004) (1993) you compare
    ...........................................................................................................................
    ...............................................................................................................................................
    .........................................................................................................................................
    ........................................................................ .............................................................................................................
    ........................................................................................................ the Civil Law system Liability; Cou commun
    sea
    Employer;
    expresses sm
    sthe and subm
    Damage (Republic
    ss he he edof app
    25
    caused 99
    the ha M
    Marriage;ca dissenter. he
    by v.
    on 64 83 46
    Employees be Toledano,
    andnhe Hidden a dec
    Conditional
    Annulment;
    Intestate ance
    Sublessee;
    (Civil a e
    shou
    Code, om
    he
    Succession 233
    Obligations
    Legal he
    and
    Paras]Liability eva
    (1997) SCRA
    husband
    as pub nce
    (2000)
    b)
    No,
    resc
    of
    [does
    cannot
    estate
    case
    requ
    be
    adv
    tactua Sect
    1.
    She
    Ph
    Pr
    between
    under
    thereof
    Wh
    entered
    ALTERNAT
    SUGGESTED
    husband’s
    pet
    through
    Art
    way.
    F
    owners.
    CRED
    dea
    cou
    serv ssuance
    aw,
    s
    performance. GENERAL
    No,
    cancer
    vate
    conducted,
    t promu
    were
    eng, res
    ctpetBaby
    pp
    construed
    ce
    e may
    ss on
    such s Art
    to nota ne
    cannot
    tes
    parenta on ex32
    grant
    torecover c
    nternat
    usufruct
    VE cannot
    wremarry.
    ofntoe
    second
    ignorance
    and ho aw,
    ANSWER of
    for
    behav H th
    ANSWERmay 17the dPRINCIPLES
    P.
    to make
    commont n t. shou
    pursuant
    s w D.
    water]
    authorof
    sone
    ona ask
    ownersh
    derogate
    never homestead
    A
    contract
    th
    or
    d.........................................................................................................................................
    mortgaged
    ces
    ng
    n e
    oner.
    Therefore,
    not
    TOR know
    bad17
    dents tw Anton
    g ofdeath be
    of
    th
    ven fato
    Fbe edgethe
    cance
    reg th.
    -Estate of,
    cance
    W ogranted?
    aor theNCC.stered
    nand to
    one
    ofamaybe No.
    be
    andthe
    h Wh
    restrof
    the nu
    edmarr d
    works
    const
    compfacts for
    year
    sto Law
    comp
    Ladysuch
    wouthe beha1529
    be
    ty C
    sance
    thousands e
    brought
    mmedrecannu
    to
    act
    where
    and
    cted v age
    shared not
    p
    and a app
    s
    that
    law
    from wh
    to
    created
    tute
    and
    ada Art
    s y of str
    annotat
    on
    nt (former
    Code
    Love
    fwith nva
    may
    a s
    m
    and ment
    tenab ch
    bybetween
    the
    and
    ne w
    cMapa
    ate
    for ed
    nce
    psycho
    readyct
    the prosper ord
    th
    rcumstances
    thethe w
    ther
    square d
    causes
    the
    safe
    y prov
    because
    n natnterpretat
    same,
    ignorance
    the
    overduty
    or of
    tunder
    on,e. y
    nary
    them,
    because
    beha
    and def ncrease
    Caro
    defendant
    be Sect
    her
    og The
    can
    yons des
    .......................................................................................................................................
    made patent,
    c where e on 1039
    a negat y bethe and two
    or
    a
    but by
    harvest
    or rees,
    ong
    for ng
    wh
    ca
    meter
    fotherve
    rends
    ofonthe
    that
    the
    rule
    nor
    ght,
    ynot? thehe
    the on
    the
    (2)
    ch
    and
    or
    on ton As
    b)
    Don
    her
    ow
    the
    abroad
    (2003)
    (c)
    A,
    M
    effect
    ALTERNAT
    SUGGESTED
    the
    state
    wh
    under Fraud;
    The
    of
    f
    Wh
    consent
    foundat
    pand
    o
    atter
    country
    NARRAM shpond
    ac
    subsequent
    e
    obv
    nements a ss
    a
    the
    the counse
    ng
    Property
    o
    ch chca M
    r
    Consequences
    materna
    death
    oushusband
    Ch
    F s has
    0 ghtUn
    antkae
    of750
    part
    makes
    he
    rstsea pt to d
    ofof
    on
    marr
    y (1993)
    e the
    abso not
    no,
    or
    VE
    where
    X pr of
    verse,
    M y Labor
    contracted
    of o
    ANSWER
    prescr
    of the
    Under
    twas of
    the s
    the
    Procurement
    aquacu
    the
    ANSWER
    of
    h nt
    y on
    on dden
    Manue
    eased acqu
    executed
    (2003)
    ssuance
    aches?
    name
    age. B,
    the
    ute
    tng ost.
    part
    Pesos defense acqu
    Lawmortgagor
    fo from sha
    fam
    easu The red
    es Art
    ture
    ow s
    es of
    and y an
    t
    criminal
    a a snganswer
    2014
    F w on of
    mandatory
    n
    purposes,
    the
    and
    ha theeasement
    d and,after
    remed
    y by
    Cert n sha
    eve aches,
    of ob Kuwathe
    case of the
    Tomas
    f
    ectcame
    ound udgmentcate
    bees, tcomp and
    must
    t
    comes
    of C
    wof wh however,
    protected v of
    contract
    hou r
    .e., to a
    ofght
    Tbe
    e Code nt t 10
    nthe an
    (a)
    e ofas a
    the
    ru
    in
    (1999)
    Prescription
    (1998) its governance he on gated, may, (Walstrom
    ....................................................................................................................................
    .............................................................................................................................................
    ........................................................................................
    ........................................................................................................................
    of Actions (1996) and or w trend thout
    by (5%)
    ......................................................................determ
    v. thdraw
    that Jr., of ng
    (G
    the .R 113 the orLiability; reg
    of
    daughter?
    (1994). sued Mar strat
    owner for25 However,
    anddon
    Marriage;
    who vorce and
    Explain. ohnson in(Art.
    100 poss
    the the bed
    subsequent
    from
    Annulment;
    the contract
    dSublease;
    the mortgaged
    However, 64
    vehicle acts
    property
    as
    vorce 493,
    (2%)
    space
    b
    before
    83 even
    because:
    Amer
    va V
    (2%) 46 ethe
    Mortgage; rg
    Conditional for the
    dCfrom
    (1996)
    Intestate
    Proper pr
    m w
    whenvcan
    Sublessee; a
    hsa
    o statute
    n th
    ddor sn forged
    sPactum
    n Code).
    Party 1)
    sSuccession
    h
    30th
    DO
    e Pub
    the
    to e
    atuated.
    husband ce sof An
    Obligationsnamethe
    Canad o
    w Op
    the co.
    ebrated?
    Liability b warehouse
    deed
    act
    ferrthday m n
    Mar tat
    Sup on
    san
    and. S
    on
    must to
    (2003) ons
    ent
    nce
    nto s. No. co
    be sfre
    The
    su
    marr Afghan
    (per
    38. Act Civil
    dondee)
    tindefeasibilityact cstan
    496), on w sth tand depends.
    aw
    sng prosper. remedy tlaw dgoverns Ru sThe
    has es the prom on fo the
    Adopt ssory vs.
    ow ng on forma note No,
    Yes.
    My fnCommon the fthe
    answer
    tDav "Renvo v defense
    o d at sby w"brought
    on not
    -bu wh of st
    w ent ch the not be tmeans Law ed contract prosper.
    the vsto "referr
    same.
    the was rnow?
    The ght ng Paragraph (1997)
    attended
    proboback"
    dof way em ss
    of
    F
    thev
    aggr
    suspens
    that
    38387, second
    Ph
    extraord
    respons
    1)
    name mistake
    SUGGESTED
    Norma
    therefrom.
    such
    shocks
    d
    than
    cance
    port
    h
    the
    c
    (3%)
    documents
    Common
    (2000)
    (1990)
    (1999) s o
    ncapac
    atter
    Commissorium ty. p
    what
    sregard
    sconventat
    ust
    a tArt
    buyer, forms
    burden
    pp
    nos rtsage
    eved
    correctness
    wou
    on
    Y. ron y:
    c ce
    death,
    e ne
    ght
    at
    nefand
    29 paragraph
    faofthe
    ty ve
    of
    fcan
    b
    over e
    ed
    of
    nary
    d or
    on
    msstrong
    cannot
    X
    Law Jan.aw
    ANSWER:
    theex
    company
    contendsparty
    the
    ons on
    fact?
    ther ty
    H and
    mustcond
    dSect
    mpe
    ...........................................................................................................
    (1999)
    for
    26
    purpose
    defau
    of n assert
    that
    from st
    the of wh
    sregards the
    acqu
    system? the
    1990) Ph
    adverse
    same? ega
    spouse
    property. so
    yonof
    tof
    parents
    agreeda to
    havech
    property
    ....................................................................................................................................
    ...................................................................................................................
    .........................................................................................................................................
    ........................................................................................................................ hbeon of
    serv
    ted rnd emn
    at pp
    reasonabss118
    the of
    ma that
    the
    d)
    ght separat
    theArt
    recogn
    of
    the
    as to thecate ne
    ve
    ensent
    a
    decency
    ann nta htof
    sso
    the
    contracted
    the
    of cthey
    possess
    and
    cert
    citedReg he es
    contract.
    tpay
    They Fam
    courts
    e
    Torrens
    prescr
    uponwas
    ....................................................................................................................the
    that
    prerogat
    sexme
    way mak
    estate.
    ned 16,
    ved
    zes
    comp
    superyfon
    of
    guard
    former
    stry,stence
    ab
    are
    in ng,
    cate Pub
    of
    cautw y
    shou
    wereboth
    the
    andas because
    on contracts,
    ng
    ts pt
    e
    Martinez, thby
    theand
    nno a
    wou or Code
    va
    the
    offve
    (Remman
    at S the
    Title
    on
    ans c
    controversy
    hav
    ousnt
    of
    a
    e mora d of
    nce
    of
    can aLand
    because
    a onger
    mbank
    evatece.aEr
    dbe cons
    tto
    marr
    d to the
    for ng
    man ton
    norsd ?ts cY
    foreboth wou
    means
    eannu tHow
    vorce
    ty.
    ex
    D., was
    take
    been
    to w
    Act,
    yC
    nowst
    ownage
    co-
    and was
    to v
    st
    at
    the
    gn tng ds t (San w fo
    appears
    way
    prov
    add
    (b)
    suspended.
    there
    Ph
    SUGGESTED
    to
    accord
    After
    the
    sues
    comp
    Dewey ud
    consc
    1.
    Patent;
    proh
    under
    dec
    be
    by
    134
    where
    d
    condom
    annu
    marr
    court. d How
    Marows:
    1979,
    ng
    114the
    notcnot
    mustrrootpp
    aratous
    property
    ser des
    ea
    b
    Pr ona
    the
    Mar
    age
    marryas
    athe
    app ther
    Aftertory
    a?
    present, eforec
    wou
    nes
    Miguel,
    State
    w
    Liability; ext When
    ntado
    w
    s toa
    on
    contract
    es n
    of o
    Effect
    be
    sa
    th that
    Nestor
    a sthyt
    nso ANSWER
    um age of
    abe
    area.
    contract
    ur nguto
    rece
    though
    26 V
    o
    e
    F dthe
    Thus,
    aw
    on good osure
    sd
    bar
    s ofnd
    you
    Perc
    1993,
    ownerrg more
    sp
    a
    for
    vent, Bany
    pst
    100
    Marriage;
    agreement
    and
    shn bought
    (2000)
    vo
    a ct app
    perfected
    ved
    aced
    no
    on
    requ Inc.Under
    Congress
    the
    o
    and
    va
    the
    d
    whoc
    in t tour
    the on
    nu
    Sublease; d,
    va cu
    was ng
    t susta
    oser
    to
    ass
    the
    worker.
    Fe
    ames
    Lou83 athe he
    w
    may
    ed
    because
    e.
    wasva
    Ph of
    rements
    46
    Annulment; crim redeem
    ty
    usufruct.
    d ture st
    to
    64 v.
    sa
    Conditional
    sfy
    th regroundthe
    the
    ue
    served
    y
    inf Art.
    forghts
    tspp
    dna
    may nab
    n
    ccontract
    the
    Metrobank
    Intestateex or
    uan
    navAssume
    from
    Validity;
    Mortgage;
    the and
    of
    d of
    Huang, property,
    a
    and
    sa. ew
    four
    Bureau
    Me
    anes,
    st
    vehicle not thee.
    by
    626
    furn
    of
    udgment
    of game
    furn
    f
    Proper
    wou
    case
    owed
    wngthe
    recover
    v
    of
    customs
    Whose
    Obligations;
    Succession
    Renren
    marr
    e was
    the
    enact
    n(4)
    the Ph
    know
    th Wh
    unpaud
    dof
    fraud
    a
    Assignment
    Pactum
    (1998) knewof
    ture-mak property
    ture-mak
    Party
    end
    for
    that
    of ch
    summons,
    c opt
    to c
    years
    as
    aw of
    granted
    age,
    G.R.
    ppa e ta
    the
    ng d the
    that
    of
    remarry
    mt was
    bought
    chance
    onunder
    secur
    and
    ne
    Promisen grant.
    ende
    a ofCfrom
    ath
    was ng
    No.
    aw not
    by
    va
    (b)
    ng ty
    h
    these
    Sa Yes,
    executed
    requ
    effect
    e
    and
    capac
    payment.
    Code. s ements:
    red
    vo vador there
    other rements
    d ve
    act
    tate
    Art from n August
    ons
    c The is
    a)
    pub by
    who e a
    the a
    tsThe
    1039, had Fob difference.
    ................................................................................................................................
    Lo
    c of
    ncept 22,
    p pet
    faPh nstruments
    gat a ta
    no C the
    ready
    ed 2002
    ssfvts pp on spouse parents
    nes. While
    mustcontract
    prov
    prescr sha to des
    be
    The ignorance bed. s f
    remarry be the ed s va
    Ph nce by
    governed d pp aof and
    on the
    ne y d (c)
    w
    re
    3(a)
    be
    by
    the he d coda
    th
    evant
    ngB not
    a of
    and sbad c p
    so
    r Art a ov
    g
    ght and e
    because
    med.
    ves
    fa c on
    dec e th, of n
    facts
    had 184 ques s
    The thereon
    redempt 10
    the of
    here, on
    from to so Effect
    the sa usobu at
    s ewh
    we
    Famy
    a
    on on d of
    reg the
    ground
    ch Obiter
    are
    of s y
    stered nce hconcrete
    aches
    Code app
    s & subdto the Dissenting
    way y does mayrecover
    ng v fence
    per s
    back U.S.
    not on
    be od
    that
    obta
    the
    of
    Accord
    ch
    make
    Summary may
    Easements;
    Registration;
    Death;
    custody.
    cont
    Enterprises,
    ALTERNAT
    SUGGESTED
    about
    ce
    w
    d
    owners,
    was
    the
    wh
    matter
    SUGGESTED
    Sublease
    (1995)
    (2000) n
    ndependent
    s
    Commissorium a
    sm un
    bad dren
    ebrat
    thout ch
    country." famended
    after
    pub ned
    rst
    nuous
    become
    aw
    annotated
    (1997)
    be
    ssed.
    me nterrupted,
    suchSweet
    the ng
    fa by
    (1990) contract.
    Effects;
    and
    c
    on
    capac
    a wVE more
    ofone
    abroad.
    th, y,
    However,
    ANSWER
    nu
    though
    ofproperty
    ANSWER:Consu and
    ANSWER
    of
    nqu the
    SC a
    wards
    Inc.h
    Taste?
    not
    theRight
    sance year
    Deed
    of
    marr sstate su un or
    v.
    t.........................................................................................................................................
    ty ry.
    afterexecut
    Decisions, owner
    to S
    the
    ta nDeed
    thetab
    peacefu
    Simultaneous fromnce
    nterrupted
    be her
    (Garcia
    CA,
    age.
    had
    (Naawan of
    of
    because
    act
    anyto
    .....................................................................................................................
    ...........................................................................................................
    ...................................................................................................................
    (2001) ton on.
    the yow Sa Way;
    townshe
    330
    the the
    been
    on
    of
    wh
    e Code,
    share tr
    the
    property. to
    waysab e ,demandab
    ed
    twenty-one
    adverse
    cover
    the of
    of
    January
    ....................................................................................................................
    ................................................................................................... case
    amounts
    SCRA
    Admv.ewas
    edate
    pub
    conf of comp
    mortgaged
    Community obof
    to
    the prov
    eRedo,
    for
    mortgaged ts
    ng sewhere,
    n c,
    the
    Lady sct of
    145
    ge ess
    more An
    document.
    atter
    c
    strator
    to ydes
    the adverse
    of assue
    uryto,
    net
    h June,e
    ng
    years
    [2000])
    Love?
    serv
    m w
    than
    G.R. mpropertythat
    aws
    than fshou
    cannotto
    by th
    Rural of the
    prof of
    to
    of then
    tude
    and? of
    the No.the
    ru
    18
    the go.hD
    and
    30
    the d se 137290,
    ts Ne
    may
    Code,
    pay
    Eduarte
    P10,000.00?
    damages
    SUGGESTED
    the
    country,
    part
    adopt
    d
    de
    aga
    Reasons. Bes
    mach
    Free
    cannot
    F
    created.
    annu
    a
    because
    governs
    h
    mach
    content
    for
    nc sherow
    vorce,
    mse 114ther
    the
    a
    ud vero ng
    des,
    nst
    Canad aws recover
    nery
    Patent
    ment
    the
    ng
    oan the
    fes
    nery.
    onng
    Liability;date
    be
    es d
    unt
    on
    the v.
    sheto
    thed of
    thetthe
    she
    and tod
    and
    July
    s of wa
    under easement
    appears
    CA,
    ANSWER as
    vorce
    an Kuwa
    shou
    26 the
    of of
    one
    ntended
    Assurance
    100 the
    capacover
    marr
    P500
    he n
    res
    ownerAquat
    covered
    court h
    property
    fMarriage;
    ved
    fe 323
    d
    not,
    31,
    ust marr buyers.
    was sdscovery
    the n
    dencyt,who court
    ed
    84 asa
    property,
    m
    be ce
    tyn oss
    that
    Phil.
    why
    2000)
    the tr tcrexamparce
    age,
    by
    for
    hertcan
    of sove
    Resources
    accepted?
    Conditional
    was sought
    order
    ed 46
    Divorce on.
    Fund under
    Ph
    65 h s
    enough
    requ from
    not?
    the in
    Thus,
    spouses
    462, the
    of
    contrary
    sch
    the
    Intestate
    be
    Ht(c)
    Mortgage;
    the w
    Under
    ned tthe
    pp of
    a e
    agreement.
    se
    Decree;benef
    gh dhood
    (Heirsrement
    case
    vehicle
    467
    th
    to cthe
    used
    the actua
    nes?
    Obligations;
    estab
    amount
    agr
    ega
    twoer.Rv fraud.
    that
    be
    Succession; andX
    (BFAR)
    Art
    Void C(2002)
    se
    Rightandto
    tact w
    and
    cu
    of on
    vof yCo.
    corrected
    [2)
    sweetheart cnner,
    the
    separat
    of be
    Marriages
    shment
    tura
    aw
    marron
    Pedro
    of S Code?
    e
    the YReserva
    years
    three
    decreed
    Resolutory Atof
    ncefor
    and
    onged
    fa1170 are
    andthat
    testator ed
    the ed w andthe
    thon,by
    (3) th
    of
    to as
    of
    to
    A. The
    Ro
    Wh
    b
    Const
    cond
    son
    decree
    Thebe
    actua
    may,
    age
    of
    138322, Remedies;
    the
    execut
    fo
    person
    ADD
    by
    when
    Juridical
    capac
    Requisites
    (b)
    Mortgage
    2)
    Dav
    How
    Death
    As
    years
    years,
    SUGGESTED
    cannot
    pub ur
    at nd Under
    and
    ow
    gated
    me, dom
    the
    sd law
    e
    T
    regards act
    does
    owner
    the d
    mentOpinion;
    ng,
    c. do concea
    ONAL
    t ct
    except
    o ng;
    tut
    the
    tyonas
    who on is
    Suppose
    W p of on
    cthout n
    possess
    (1998)
    bed, s359],
    aws
    on
    you
    the
    Ramon a
    to n
    ace the
    on
    not
    commun
    October th ca
    not
    SEC.
    oned m
    ANSWERS
    other
    reg
    then
    ANSWERbound
    fsthe
    of the
    succeed
    (1994) nReconveyance;
    SC
    men
    Capacity;
    ob
    shou ed
    (1996)
    owner
    "governance":
    s reg
    ona ng
    affords
    of
    d n
    theoran
    doctr
    where65,strat fe
    Ph 4. gat
    ob by
    Decisions
    Afghan ve
    on
    Norma
    n other
    the nexcuse
    spouse
    wd
    stero
    h
    has
    2, yWho
    and
    the by
    cons
    ty ect the
    thne
    gherdrug
    on,
    be
    the
    pp
    of onbe {5)
    2001)fu
    shacountry
    then n
    now
    the the
    second rea
    nes,decof
    property
    h he
    mayor
    acqu
    of (1994)
    stan.
    derat
    heone
    preced
    napp
    has add for
    protect
    was
    Natural
    estate
    the
    s days
    property be
    .
    subd
    a ex
    rs afrPh
    contract
    ned
    the
    Governance
    son, sca ghts
    not
    year
    adopt of
    the
    red
    usufruct Art.
    deedon a
    governed
    concept oc
    on
    cab
    and n
    not
    better ng
    Ph
    v
    WppB
    from
    may fore
    on complying
    and wh exs: to
    17
    (Art
    and contractus,
    e,
    the the
    ne
    quest
    thonofs
    y, spp
    be
    to –or the
    .........................................................................................
    dec
    ch he
    gner
    be of
    the
    grd
    r ng
    The c
    rece
    who aws
    because ng
    abor
    has
    mortgage
    ocated, n ne
    ghtaggr
    of
    ven by
    in e the
    they
    con a
    and and
    entered
    areon,
    Sta. 1185,
    part Court
    Civil atthe
    pt
    s he
    app
    fa
    owner,
    s with
    pub C
    andthe
    eved
    uga
    nce the
    25,the
    arees
    orvas
    en
    of
    by y t c (a)
    Petron
    A.
    mora
    make
    was
    therefore
    a
    [1996]).
    An
    (c)
    aff
    F
    Perc 2.
    gus
    nferred.
    aw
    n
    ega
    Applicable
    mmovab
    udgment
    Exp
    w
    pub
    nvo
    can
    and/or Sec,
    not
    1965.
    road
    Suppose
    th p app
    x ty f s
    vaThe
    to
    a
    on due
    ves
    no can
    h the any
    of
    n. damages.
    nterest
    po
    sMar y a
    So2,
    bncator
    area
    (d) marr
    snd
    to
    From
    sa
    contr
    the
    doctor.
    s be e hadArt
    Mere
    d
    debt
    cy.
    gnature content
    o, h
    un
    the
    nsteadon
    or e
    essence st
    acqung
    Laws; s
    of
    ownersh
    separat cs
    be
    from gaagenct
    own
    the
    awfu
    for
    butory e ready
    before
    na
    ease
    vo
    30 upon
    ng
    Her But de
    red
    o on.
    to and
    d, on
    the of
    facts,
    y act
    a
    capacity
    hectares,
    nu ay the
    on s the
    ready
    use
    contract
    contemp
    d
    neg
    p
    tour
    by The
    an 10
    Mans
    s
    exp tA
    nce
    the
    reg
    d or
    of y correct.
    me Effectivity
    n
    t
    presence
    ease.
    of
    ng Const
    andt
    of
    sa st om prov
    red.there
    strat
    gencesa
    not
    act appears
    hen tsd and
    fcase.
    the
    v to
    property, ess
    between
    ocated
    toto C.c
    ated.ng
    pa
    neverthe
    on
    property
    sa
    (P.D. sor
    Hence, ontut Under
    ontfor on
    when was of
    thezen,
    d and ofohnson
    Expenses
    conf
    hav on
    sto Laws
    because
    anthe states
    that
    Hence,
    705) a
    two
    t n a
    t BaArt
    prov
    they
    ng of
    ermat
    Genera
    shou
    can federa
    act
    amount
    ess,
    recover
    o(1990)
    though
    bought t Erncthat
    been was des ehe
    on,
    the onto
    d
    an e
    1990,
    Bank ex
    was
    has
    BUYER
    beh
    Bart.
    Land
    This st rema
    nd17
    Why?work w
    Pac
    Reg
    v. p.
    COMMON had
    years
    Court the
    vs.is f ned
    stratco(3%)
    ...........................................................................................................
    (1992)
    Troncal
    Redemption
    1. Bu notpso appea
    uro
    of n cert
    on
    ........................................................................................................
    Condition (1999) d ngs Equity (1999)
    are d,
    of a d
    the
    intended facto caE
    Author
    Redemption
    ways f ed
    r cate
    was names
    capac theceased
    mmovab 14
    ty for
    G.R.
    .................................................................................................
    ............................................................................................................. (1999) to
    case. ty.
    (LRA). and as
    sale
    CARRIERS..........................................................................................................................................
    Appeals, No. determ
    to such. e F
    Wh or be
    was
    128573, e
    commerce. May effect
    ................................................................................
    property, the
    ne 12; Bart and the
    andve. the
    Thisadopted
    Pedro,
    same
    years.
    Lopez 3)
    Art
    pay ater work
    114 Ac Cd ethe
    whenvdecision
    t
    vorce.
    v.
    26 a
    26
    Otherw
    Moral me is Code,
    so
    [In
    De
    Marriage; a oanPub
    a a
    freeware.
    Damages sore:Short
    Castro ch F se,
    47 those
    obta of co
    and
    p
    Adoption
    84 d
    Divorce no
    the
    Legitime& ywas a
    sues 324
    Extinguishment; ns
    Attythereafter,c who
    division
    the
    adopt
    It65aDecrees; t
    maya
    Feesn SCRA
    Nuisance;Pr
    zen, her
    ready
    of n
    bank
    ntado
    (2002) be on
    Stephanie the
    Filiation n 591 of a
    born
    wF
    freely
    Assignment
    FamilyofHouse; performance
    forec
    re
    or the
    [2000] not g
    to
    marr damagescopied
    Children ous Supreme
    osed
    them.
    be
    Nathy of Rights ed Notand
    citing a the of 100
    a
    td)
    to The
    nu
    ext
    the
    party
    NCC).
    compe Prescriptive
    it,
    On
    Code
    fo
    executed.
    Persons
    "
    re
    E
    as
    agreement
    not nto
    n
    ntome
    me
    awgenera
    the
    ow
    egated
    atedSonny
    the reg
    ignorance
    10 ngu
    ce ty
    o
    stsu wof
    the ng
    of whog
    prov September
    marr
    pu th
    forum
    of stered
    ort
    the
    that
    ed ven
    shment
    may
    the w atLady
    (1999)
    and
    hands
    den toru nex
    age
    des
    may
    to natbetween prob
    on
    her of
    marr
    w e,
    adopt:
    pay LuPeriod
    prosper.re
    aArt n
    cons
    on" fact
    stence
    thatLove
    asf ofthethe
    ............................................................................................................................................
    s em,
    ef e 1965,
    age,
    ster Lo
    to
    of Any the uname
    eliminates
    the
    to aw and
    the (1997)
    the es
    summary ta Wh ofwho the
    act
    beMe
    Filipino
    ,..................................................................................................
    of
    u. not the
    damages Under an X enforce party- and of
    forms
    s
    nnocentraud the
    decedent,
    Arthe
    property of
    c
    Y e toon v the
    DOv
    sought
    n-had was
    anyrespondent.
    ann cthe cannot
    under criminal
    contract
    for
    snterest e app
    and Citizen d abpadverse
    has
    been
    that
    15
    fore sm
    owner ace
    resc
    purchaser was Ar ed
    so ty
    .e..
    of n ssa
    gnd ssued
    fa emn
    ss
    sha intent
    for
    where
    46 a andsregard
    and
    another
    marr
    the Xof h of ready
    cCis c
    o
    on
    fa s a
    runs
    athea
    New t not
    fmhe
    edtom
    es
    an
    but
    for a
    e Diligence (b)
    va
    606
    that:
    stand
    regu
    an
    d
    the
    on
    wou
    of
    proceed mprove
    Successional
    succeed
    Saost.
    (3) n
    acob,
    ncrease d y Yes,
    d
    sum,
    Free
    vvador
    the a notof
    forma
    property
    d at
    Th nwhen
    ngThe
    en a the on the
    1998
    const
    s
    sa deve
    Patent
    Sw
    ng the
    the who
    a
    (1991)
    means
    nand Ce. t State
    wh remedy
    one,
    ss wn cev
    es th
    tuteopor
    parents
    NARRAM
    rem.
    On n ch ebrated
    Rights
    nat
    dth Code,
    ng
    ofs after
    an that
    adoes
    nto recogn
    ona a
    thethe was
    anowned
    mode
    sthe tsw former
    ndependent
    ust anon
    maof
    , an
    of
    Xsecond
    other nvas
    marrprosper
    10
    usufruct
    because
    not
    thest y ofzes
    access
    Mr.
    fosuren Equity
    n
    nexp
    ed pu he ob concess oned common
    bas
    const
    F Cruz
    hand,
    and
    ates the
    marr
    can
    ect pbecause
    granted
    follows
    cab
    of
    Lourdes, s a
    roadno tute
    uncond
    ve f
    shou
    that sanct
    of
    w age e marr
    possessory
    onRe c sof must
    the
    de
    GHTthe
    the
    t under zenwthe
    for
    nher
    a ty
    aches ay t ages
    Law r
    su onaact be
    ce of
    beof t.
    t s
    ord
    po Rosa,
    of
    Law
    paragraphs
    partnersh
    d
    prescr ed aA cynary
    RTC is
    adopt parce
    noisy tnLaguna, cons
    codal,
    pt a of on. acqu
    p on Bu derat
    ane
    orof property acan.
    statutory
    Rosar
    by w
    dangerousand
    sredeem tthout
    crash. ons
    Norma cve o eor by
    2180
    shasprescr g anand There
    a na
    ofthe
    wso access B
    of y
    written
    be
    factory gu pt
    aw
    ng the reg forfe on ty of
    term
    no to C steredBof law. v the
    for
    ted
    inproof nates
    aches
    Code". forum.It ten n under
    private as favor the (10)
    not to operate
    fde
    SUGGESTED Santos vered
    ownersh C to th
    ty. ANSWERd svert
    p, He OCT Martare
    presented to must a
    the of be her
    mortgagee the reckoned ownersh Free w Patent p?
    thout
    from rat
    to d fthe
    have ttheOF
    CONFLICT OF LAWS
    January has
    they
    and
    W
    cond
    appea
    (2005)
    (1997)
    Nuisance 1 no
    the
    Car were
    Extraordinary
    (2001) on perwas ex
    suos
    13, se of
    of stence
    tmade
    st pend
    2003)prosper? the ng
    to ndependent
    property beand
    .............................................................................................................
    ............................................................................................................................
    ............................................................................................................................................................
    ...............................................................................................
    (2006) ega age [5%] the eve th ot by n the so A, of
    search d not theby and ce Anton propertyfor that
    any
    s o? Me
    the
    a w
    exp
    Astorga
    ceremony
    for
    Sps. aggr
    Court
    Bethe rst
    mortgage.
    Canad tnesses
    owed.
    26 rred
    breach n be
    Marriage;eved the
    ob
    maybe sues
    an. reso Garcia, and court
    gat spouse
    of
    Can n114 At ved
    Divorce ames
    Cebu on set
    contract that
    after
    65V
    Moralthe n84G.R. (De
    rg the
    Nuisance;ava
    aside
    Decrees; C for forec
    Damages; ty,
    o Leon
    exerc
    Extinguishment; the
    No. annu
    w marry w
    gu hce by
    th
    Filipino se
    mse
    148311,
    Public vs.
    max tyneed
    ebratedthe
    respect
    ment o
    Non-Recovery aga Mabanag.
    equ
    f/herse
    of
    Nuisance
    Spouses mum 47 not
    Supreme
    sa
    Cause nof ty
    March contravent
    Legitime; accord
    toe, n and
    the be
    becoming
    vs. Thereofextens
    fthe of-
    the
    (2000)
    Private 3831, rCourt
    Action ng ownPh
    bank on
    toon .
    du
    contract
    recover
    FC
    counter
    the even
    b)
    Conditional
    Easements;
    S
    as
    free
    ALTERNAT
    reg
    of
    op
    nat f the nce The
    long
    y
    nwh patent
    same,
    stered
    contracts,
    st (2003)
    on annotated
    no chn
    fStar The the
    natura
    as the
    ng
    (Op se the
    makes
    VE to s under n
    of regcover
    made
    ANSWERn and wthe
    our the nstances
    Obligations;
    contract
    ur
    on stratmother,
    he s,
    ous at
    shou
    the
    name
    134crng or marrno
    and
    fundamenta m on
    ......................................................................................................................................
    there is the y two
    prentered negligence
    s. d na
    affectsage of
    nc
    of
    other where
    of
    be
    ofCaro
    back ots the
    Rod p vo
    prosecut gon
    1993) es emp ven
    pub ,the
    -dab and
    ntoof
    Lot
    when the
    ofshou and e oyment
    (Art,
    dueob a
    that
    hea c A governs
    under npart
    on. drgator
    he the
    tnstruments
    and the
    th NCC).
    course.
    statutory
    the have
    e es
    bought Ar
    and Lot nameunder same to
    was
    ness
    w 45 the
    BIn th -a Easements;
    SUGGESTED
    B.
    rNo,
    act
    so
    the
    fam
    dec
    comp
    governed
    qua
    fbeen
    sa
    33 Adopted
    A e emn
    d
    e.
    Fowed Theon V
    tforma
    years ded p y
    fon me Crg
    wh
    a
    ed prescr
    no fore
    zed
    fe
    ned
    and that
    upon
    toch ocoup ANSWER
    by
    thatand
    Child cannot
    adopt gner
    outs
    D of, bes
    may
    he
    Ph Right
    sha
    by
    are
    he
    e, de
    (2004) was
    pp
    Mr. who
    n
    a a e
    took va not tenapse
    protect
    re ma the
    ne a and d at of executes
    rthe
    supposed
    co-owners y
    (10)
    the or aw
    nePh
    ve remarry.
    before
    Mrs. 10 ty and
    by years,
    under
    fthecannot pp
    Ignorancerst of BM, consangu nes a h
    strengthen
    the
    step toth
    w s
    Hnot
    the
    r., be
    th sw
    (Tokyo)
    rd of
    co-owners case
    w
    purchase
    dec pr
    assert the
    B person nth
    n nc
    ofnCruz
    ded Law ty. badnthe s
    the
    p
    the
    ng n e
    va
    C
    landyears
    2)
    of forum.
    for
    obnox
    to
    h
    ALTERNAT
    SUGGESTED
    who
    parenta
    hav
    un
    Exp
    h
    pendens ower
    additionally v
    s
    ddenue,
    ghway.pay
    The
    the
    whessf2ona
    Span
    ng
    a ve
    Consu
    d Code,
    (1%) estate.
    ch
    n. ous
    requ
    ed (Moreno.
    the
    common
    they the years
    asserted
    ab
    defect (5%) VEaw.
    author
    st shWhen
    t fANSWERto rst. ta
    ANSWERS
    res
    attaches. smortgage
    ty t
    aws
    Mortgage
    derived Art
    Sem
    uncance
    gn t or was
    of e w
    (1)a he
    ty c
    ch
    the me
    .................................................................................................................................. Ph
    forum
    th
    re
    uher
    nchoate e
    conductor
    becomes
    of app pregnant
    possess 16
    at
    from
    dren
    o
    ......................................................................................................................
    ..........................................................................................................
    ...........................................................................
    ............................................................................................... s
    Caro
    document pp
    the s Law?
    r ng
    on
    ed, prov
    debt s ed
    parents
    ght ne pub
    case
    or,
    y r to
    BartReg
    for
    over surv
    ght des
    Law
    toon for
    ncontestab
    .............................................................................................................................. fam f ca law. so
    they Company.
    ster
    nthere
    wh po
    the
    to
    B t v n
    the D
    me,
    cense good
    ng.
    d ng y paragraph
    ake
    ch ct
    cy.
    Common
    the harvest
    w f
    of onary,
    are
    may rst
    ghts There
    s to
    fa not r Deeds
    e t
    th
    none,
    s me,
    debt and
    ater and
    gethThe
    and
    forp. s s
    27 Mrs.
    (Agra
    REDEMPT
    estab
    d
    202)
    acknow
    a
    2005;
    thereof,
    the
    pr 250,000
    Sect
    F
    end
    annotat
    ur
    sitting
    acqu
    marr
    Ph ( ghts
    d, )
    sd
    ntp date ppof
    whona,
    Reg ctZY
    ng
    red
    age.v. of
    granted.
    shthe
    Rabuya,on
    ennes?
    115 41,
    ngPNB.
    edged cannot
    nf
    as the
    Pesos
    then
    of
    ster the
    therefore,
    agreement.
    65 the ON
    the
    may
    banc, Berne,
    tamesease
    the Chapter
    execut
    es
    Exp n owner,
    bu 309
    status
    ofw s
    grant
    before
    The
    th
    of wh
    mortgage fe
    a recover
    the
    the
    a Deeds,
    d
    opposesPh Sw
    s SCRA
    Supreme
    n. dng,
    85100 one of
    prayer
    Law the V
    case, mach
    owner whr
    scovers
    n ppthe
    tzer
    a ght
    the
    be of of notary
    on ch
    509).
    Bureau
    ne as
    andand.
    ng
    thethe
    parents
    thereon.
    or res
    nery
    when of
    of under
    Persons
    su Court a
    aw. after
    the the
    tPub
    he
    annu
    47 spouse
    Three
    whether
    contract
    pubf sha
    reconveyance
    ofMarv
    Pedro
    ed h wasArt of
    c
    mortgagor
    property?
    the Between
    decision ghest
    ment c.
    and
    bymmLand years
    become cmarr
    Mrs. Mayn who
    e t
    ssued
    Sup
    ater or grat
    Familydon429
    bs Act, d thest
    mayage
    from
    dder. o
    co,has
    eft to
    on
    not of a
    Alien
    Compulsory
    Nuisance
    (2006)
    The
    contract
    of respondent (2004)
    (1996) actAGENCY (2005) Heirs
    seem on nbetween: possess
    (2003) w to
    was have not
    procured on dea of prosper fu ta. w by cover vth means capac tbecause separate ty of and actua the
    and ega b)
    Marriage; The Divorce four Quasi-Delict
    Ownership;
    Decrees; bas cautonomous
    Filipino eobserved
    Co-Ownership
    (1992) ements Extinguishment; Spouses of
    (1992)
    becoming Legitime; aches Compensation
    Alien are; (1)
    dutTorts;
    Promise
    a)
    Sect
    o
    respect
    Go
    comfort distributed,
    Ownership;
    Classification
    There
    No,
    b)
    D
    executed
    better
    addition,
    s
    the
    3)
    company,
    two
    254,
    A
    a
    sha
    concerned
    estab MPRESCR
    n
    aws.
    n st
    two
    tuated
    ust
    ma
    ncontrovertWhere
    he
    contracts.
    strongngres,
    they
    After
    ngu
    same
    that on
    vs.
    1982 be FC ce
    donated cannot
    shseparate
    rdren
    After of7O
    Mistake
    to nto
    tstatus,sh
    ght
    the
    pa
    pub n
    governed (1997)
    may
    mistake
    he
    from
    tsought
    the PTthe
    n
    ord Sant
    ts
    however,
    ed.).and n
    dnevertheless,
    Prescriptive
    of
    bac aOb
    amount Bn
    nature
    the
    c
    d"subd w be
    rece
    e.nary not
    broad
    Man
    ofthe
    P100,000.00 pay
    po (1998)
    LSpan
    P.D.
    on documents
    thago,
    and TY,
    ght
    gat
    sto a
    on
    Fact mus by
    tspec
    v pt
    the
    cy redeem
    atter.
    peop
    the Co-Ownership;
    usufruct
    ta,s1529
    and
    beason
    ons
    of shsense
    of
    sabe
    the
    capac
    enshr
    on,(1996) doubtful
    not of
    consu
    and Ph the
    however
    fmeans
    successcuredthe
    va
    ear
    c Thus,
    Dav PERMISSION
    ...................................................................................................................................................................
    Mortgage
    aws optsthe
    n sbecause
    tospp other
    the
    d
    yprov
    ned
    ty
    mortgaged gned
    pr
    good
    Upon
    ng
    the sta dty,
    the of
    ngne by or
    Don
    of onanc be ends
    fee.fromsob
    Consu
    nv
    represented the to an
    unbornhand,
    by
    p
    difficult
    ons
    Art
    c
    our cert
    on
    brough
    persons aw
    ...........................................................................................................
    counre there
    Law
    gat
    resc easement
    h
    countryofy
    contracts
    cand.
    ty
    ghts, that
    ta fm,ed
    by of means
    shou
    for
    cat
    onto TO
    ust
    nd
    ch w
    be
    26 Xwas
    was
    uan
    and
    an on
    30
    the
    are COPY
    ce
    hthed.
    to d snss, c) Inter-Country
    Way
    The
    Ph
    not
    one
    accordance
    reaches
    fam
    who
    fa
    of
    accord
    property.
    h
    the
    SUGGESTED
    redeem
    part Hidden
    B.
    to
    w
    wh (that
    nterest
    ater, sfrom
    th. )ex
    Suppose
    adopt chrcovered
    Supposing ppCcoconut
    (1)
    nher
    property of y
    ght (2000)
    represent
    voc
    the
    her as the
    nes
    Hence,
    s ng
    our year aapp
    thento a
    fcounters
    YV, tCode
    coup certa
    ce to
    Therefore,
    ANSWER
    husband editors
    the bas
    750,000
    pub that
    the by farm
    whenmay
    w
    ebrat
    anof cabh
    propertyw thaton
    abso
    e Art
    ths Adoption;
    the n
    cmay
    che the
    both
    feand.
    orphan dec e age
    own
    doma of
    y isa
    on c
    goesthe
    has on ute
    Pesos.
    essor, eof
    pet
    they ADVISABLE
    Feder
    contro
    actua
    the
    be
    ded s.
    part sha
    ty 26representat
    so “A fromwas
    n trepe
    s(to) aws
    commun
    for suof
    to
    don
    as filed
    es
    DS”. w co
    subs the
    tres
    agr
    at not
    abroadforng
    damages
    St.at
    presumed of ed 11
    soc san
    n
    your cu the
    the
    de Fam
    C the
    stsurrounded
    even Inferior
    tyforce
    or aa
    nterest to
    and
    tura for
    on
    extra-n reopen
    petition
    tanswer
    to
    re’s me
    propertyprotect
    forma
    nsty
    prevented.
    the anthe
    whenD
    workCode,
    can
    under Courts
    tut
    of
    fands. n (Arts.
    cannot
    act
    ud be ng astent
    cthe
    on. the
    by
    he
    be
    on es
    to
    or
    a 101
    PERSONS
    (2)
    parents
    the law
    w
    more
    any
    property
    (1999)
    Compulsorynva fe, ust
    is
    chshare.
    (2002) date thanbasically
    u ar a, to
    Heirs ore.
    ses40 Zwho
    Car of wasyears. ust
    from
    m derived
    the
    os, n not sha
    who guquas so
    ........................................................................................................................
    ................................................................................................................................
    ....................................................................................................................................................
    ...........................................................................
    ghts vs. Secondary e" the ty
    present from
    Compulsory W
    mmed -de rspouse ght case ct then.
    to
    ate that
    mother.
    (Arts.
    Heirs bylaw.
    the ymust (2005)the a
    caused n2176 prev adverse
    anuaryW Th ous
    y gRelations,
    Lot and
    for
    Pr
    ..........................................................................
    27 Marriage; conduct them
    correspond
    be
    the
    When ve B
    ntado
    Donations the
    the be set
    ground to
    Deportat
    Car and Perc
    probated
    Cesar
    Un reg on os
    aside
    by the p.
    ted va ng
    that
    Reason strat
    the
    the
    613].
    66 who
    on nnocent
    Or
    States
    earned by agreed
    part
    Ownership;
    of on
    n (B g has
    that: the
    85
    Marriage; d na aD) d
    of
    actua
    and
    Extinguishment; Ph purchaser
    Cert
    contrary
    not
    about
    115 (a) the the
    per became
    Co-Ownership; present
    Effect ppy
    even
    Sup
    48 fod possessed
    defendant
    Quasi-Delict a cate nes?
    th
    Preterition
    of eged ofco know ruling
    s,
    Declaration forof
    y ten
    naturacannot
    Compensation he
    Prescription
    (2005) T
    demand va the
    fraudu tdays,
    that or e ue,
    of and
    of(OCT)
    zed
    ed
    of he the one
    vs. ng
    are an
    B Period
    that cons
    apart
    (not
    Prescription
    1.
    Senen
    s
    no
    abrogated
    Va strong n s
    ncea)a ent Cont c
    noderat
    Agency
    Coownershust
    P50,000.00
    defense from ass
    y and
    no an (2004)
    t construct
    nuous
    t nd "ob e on
    suthe
    by Peter to
    easement
    cate t for
    (2002)
    P.D.
    gated" of
    the and
    for
    and
    p for are
    thatthe ve)
    among damages,
    892 don
    prescr
    and the scont
    brothers.
    h promfraud, wh death n
    presupposes ptch derogat
    Anton ssory
    nuous wh
    on p t of stood
    Senen
    a ch the nt
    o, snote on ffs untenab
    Bart, n
    of m two c was no be
    grated
    a
    that med w
    and the
    (2) seof e Domiciliary
    Formalities
    1.
    A.
    Hans
    Yes. The Berber,
    Under Law
    sa e of Art (2005)
    a the German c country
    es and theory 815 to nat of
    uan and ona wh s 17 ch
    , not and vs. he of va h s
    the(2003)
    s d,a C v
    govern.
    ch dThe sage we Be fare ng over sbuyer the 18 sthe
    paramountrmse
    years on controversy
    Februaryfthat oeach d and cons to a16, Mar
    no may
    derat 1976,
    a
    onger beon the
    descr
    For sa ands bed dcno, Art of n: c Romu e to be o. app Feder cab co e, seeks fthe spouse a (rmother ght of
    days, SUGGESTED
    question
    by the cance Pub of ANSWER law
    c at Land may
    on ..................................................................................................................................
    thereof
    nspector be the basis
    sed st of
    Me necessary good v faith ALTERNAT
    of the reg VE strat ANSWER on decree may be fred11 ed. The
    b 5
    have
    unreasonab
    c
    2180
    marr (a)
    cons
    wh
    payment
    present
    contract
    order
    Unfortunate
    Const
    Y.
    that
    surv
    1974,
    the sa
    years
    nterpretat
    nd theWouCan
    ch
    mant
    3cance ng
    heDecisions
    v dered the
    C of tut
    mng D,
    rom
    v the
    they
    d
    w act n
    success
    rror force
    n of
    but
    on
    upon
    your
    came
    or,
    EheCode)
    aton. as
    quest
    the m he
    on
    ethe
    y,
    purchase on
    and
    (1994)
    rs
    pronare
    n nor
    a
    extent,
    has dof
    Thto case
    the
    answer
    the
    defau
    nc
    scovery
    correspond
    are
    of on,
    ntoandon, s
    Fannu aw
    ty executed.
    chosenhas baby of
    and
    e h a between
    possess
    shaed ttwou of notD,
    nof shereo
    been
    spouses ce good
    ntr
    mother,
    the
    an aE
    ch d
    dcover
    c....................................................................................................
    tpthe protect
    fzens be ceof on
    thesa
    fnu
    to andng ru
    ns
    e
    act sa
    on
    dren,
    Torrens
    of
    under
    ofe
    fa
    d the
    However,
    sance.
    wa fee
    thee cone
    same d
    Fwas who th
    sas
    va
    ocated
    of
    spec
    on abor. to
    be ve part
    u the
    the
    pendens,and
    theAr
    fo be
    d
    hour
    n Ph
    a nst
    were
    fasSa
    System tn ty cca
    es.
    bas
    ows:
    Regand
    court the
    for sehad
    property
    nnocent tuted
    vador
    ppof fa
    n 47(3)sboth
    after
    y ru
    sterthe
    neshto
    the
    as
    to
    to
    of seGrounds;
    sn adopt country
    number
    489
    recovered.
    app
    prosper.
    to
    SUGGESTED
    ALTERNAT
    Ern
    con
    forec
    the
    under
    that
    as
    demand (b)
    Marce
    Ph
    they
    No. tab
    Supreme
    act
    had asha
    Treasures
    orphanage an re
    recover
    nurse
    document
    on e Th
    uga
    pp
    Rega
    same? and
    375,
    such ed
    she marrhas
    aosure
    shoufor
    Amer sVicky
    nes.
    to of
    equa
    a where
    492.
    VE
    andbe for
    partnersh
    m
    Subsequent
    mmed
    damages.
    payment a the
    an d
    annuageyears
    a
    ANSWERExp
    Court
    d (1997)
    The
    ANSWERn
    o
    can ng
    treasure
    ownersh
    acob
    bearby doctrC
    sease y
    refuses
    New rw a
    ownershin
    were ght they
    vcprotect
    a spec
    same
    pay
    th
    ate n.
    the the the
    Code).
    York
    tsubsequent
    for ne
    itselfcase
    zen. to
    the
    socense
    p y sng p y,
    forec
    dep fof
    hunter
    to m
    or
    oss. are
    exc
    eave
    that sed year
    butCscome
    assessor
    Mar the
    ofar
    has
    Nestor ga
    to
    nce ty.
    or
    ver true even
    ude so
    osure
    there success
    ythe
    s to
    on
    ns,
    1947the as
    acqu
    es aff
    They
    by emn
    fe
    y
    fo2000,
    home w
    y
    any so acqu
    made ust of
    estab
    because th
    cted the
    possess
    buyer
    A
    sSeparation:
    countryowedsa
    was ad zed
    off the
    oved
    person
    ter eaon,regards
    after
    the red Prejudicial
    th
    will
    nohobby,
    w
    the
    ce aPedro
    corrective
    under sh
    nsofar rd
    th
    but apan),
    fornthe
    and on
    under your
    from thethe
    shethetoto
    toof as
    sfraud
    Yes, Nullity
    (2001)
    (2000)
    non-prosecut
    does Payment
    Ro(1996) tPer and change of (1998) good
    ....................................................................................................................................................
    s on ab of mora
    .........................................................................................................................................................
    ...........................................................................................................
    ..................................................... ts ethe
    ........................................................................................................................................................... under character cr character m the
    na casecontract as 28 for
    mmovab Marriage; estafa. as far eof answerAs under counse
    Declaration 66
    whom of
    Ownership; of B,
    Nullity: he 85 sha c
    Co-Ownership;
    Annulment: a
    Extinguishment; ms,115
    answer g
    Quasi-Delict;Legal v 48 the
    Prescription ng Compensation/Set-
    Preterition;
    101 comp rgnerActs se
    Agency (2002) contrary ato nt vs. the as
    because
    pubthey
    the
    a
    and
    FC
    render
    even
    1
    comp
    wherever
    throughextr
    2.
    easements;
    to
    tenements
    Car
    ALTERNAT
    more
    (Art.
    been
    2)
    nu
    va
    As
    1.
    contract
    of
    SUGGESTED
    F n
    testamentary
    de
    Therefore,
    preced
    between b)
    son;
    m Canada
    custody
    ue. S
    1977 os
    ands
    very.fyns
    Apparent
    to such
    reg
    nor
    526.
    Questions ncesu
    thoughn suffered
    the
    ance c.
    The
    Donat
    However,ng tot
    actuaone an
    stered
    VE
    tab
    or
    h Mayamount
    covered
    accord
    heNCC).
    they a,
    neffect
    part
    quest
    the
    s Fraud
    start
    be
    duratear
    ANSWER
    r
    more wact
    |2%]
    y
    drug
    of thus
    and and
    ghts.
    (1997)the
    ons , tr
    success
    th ong t
    A
    second cont y
    may
    the on ed
    ng
    Mistake
    on?
    s n
    owner
    add
    ma on w
    pve,
    than
    the
    and wh
    - sas
    non-apparent
    by
    nce ur
    byng ace
    PERSONS...................................................................................................................................................................
    regards
    n
    Deeds
    p no
    c the nu at sett
    was makes
    sance ANSWER "trend":
    the ement
    executed because
    t an
    me wh
    th.
    e To
    Civil
    modes actua
    of c
    nuous,
    Exp
    annotat
    be. wou
    es of e
    sewhere,
    otherw
    reason
    recovercond
    the Span
    on to
    Rod onch
    the
    (10)Mar
    contract a
    before The
    where st
    may
    ofa
    law
    the me
    there from
    d
    o
    sha
    Thus, h d seeks
    n fopen,
    contract
    n.d tyears
    recogn correspond
    fferent
    a,
    fact sh
    Ber
    ghway, r the
    your
    is
    onds a
    se,
    on
    marr
    (3%)of my the be
    parents
    ........................................................................................................................................
    Obv to Ph ous pp
    y, ne
    B
    not
    now
    estate,
    the
    be t then
    ssha teenager.
    may,
    the was
    wh treg
    torture
    ofng to
    the
    marr
    a true
    from es
    notor
    answer. Law,
    governed acqu
    actua
    d
    zedage persons
    contract
    the sdec
    d
    tending
    tendencych
    P100.000.00
    andmarr spstrat
    be that
    ur cont
    scovered
    nscr
    not
    age
    can
    omat ove,
    the
    by pend
    but
    t to
    sd
    ous, aare
    deve red
    Franc dur
    y
    age on
    canready
    were
    pt ct
    opposed
    aw ost
    Peter
    nued
    sha
    date
    se and
    was
    to
    c the
    one
    by ng
    on
    to by
    on
    ng
    op or do
    of s
    for earn Me Applicable
    Ejectment
    Nationality
    1.
    My
    D
    c
    be
    F
    Code,
    ALTERNAT
    SUGGESTED
    way
    who
    act
    Appilicable
    person
    and
    exemp
    subd
    the
    Art.
    forec
    character (4)
    to fng
    absence
    has
    sexua
    treated
    severa tthe
    exp st The
    p
    vzen
    ng on
    The answer
    en nngu
    no
    the
    found through
    f
    va v
    and.
    ratbuyer
    117(7} contrary
    the
    osure
    s ed for
    s furn
    under
    ary
    oyment
    t w
    shou
    cert
    y-transmherd be
    on
    propert
    t sh VE fe
    of
    e forfe,
    of forma
    ANSWER
    reconveyance
    there
    a
    By damages.
    s w
    ANSWER
    of
    (Floro
    sa Suit
    ture-mak
    B,
    f
    the d
    proof
    mapa dTheory
    ke
    dec a
    Laws; br
    Art
    Rhoda,
    cate
    of ord dwho
    the
    her
    pre to
    port
    vorce Laws;
    and esnot
    a ef
    e asc
    same?
    ss the
    the
    ared wh
    vate vs.
    ty aw.
    un
    naryof e
    unborny
    as
    three-year
    eg
    us. bn reondbe
    of
    laws817
    such,are must
    ch
    ethe Cancellation
    (2004)
    ng
    ess
    t
    amount
    vo Fam
    sposa to
    Llenado,
    property. ed
    but
    Therefore,
    the
    d of
    mate d the appears
    standards, dof
    Explain.s Labor
    mach
    on
    permanent
    the
    seases,
    Ph
    ab governing
    there are
    from bed
    stry same
    the
    execut n chc
    stthe
    of pp act
    t
    contract
    pa t ear
    and
    Code, a
    o nery
    meNew
    nct
    244fore
    s
    concept
    the d so te
    forester
    to
    nes
    d ser
    t
    and no
    an yon
    (2%)
    for fby
    ofs from11
    of
    33nder
    vaCarC
    res
    ous
    and. sthey
    transfer
    express
    SCRA713).
    thew
    the of
    Romu osses
    the A
    between:
    vth movab
    death
    cate
    there. d
    yearsdents
    anda os
    the
    on. and
    duty thatCode,
    at
    Th
    the w
    nthave
    buyer patthe
    o the
    The
    s the
    s e,
    areof to
    of
    of of
    of d e s s
    the
    spouse;
    as
    (a)
    interest
    w
    nu
    we
    Separation
    Compulsory
    to
    property.
    Th and
    ALTERNATIVE
    fe,
    moralss
    No,
    4 fo
    Lady
    No,fyas reg
    Off;
    Sale
    capac
    W
    cannot
    ow
    the the
    (1996) of
    Y
    ofma. strat
    Banks
    Heir
    (2000)A
    ng:
    Property
    Lover
    wou
    the
    has
    ty; ssuance
    ...........................................................................................................
    The act on bu
    c su
    ANSWER: (1999) a on.
    (1998)
    be
    not
    and
    ORIGINAL
    t d m (2003)
    s a
    ng not
    been
    done s eg
    concerned. not of
    s become ng an conv
    a new
    anymore
    correct.
    SOURCES/REFERENCES
    they
    mmovab cted
    ................................................................................................
    .............................................................................................................
    for resc ............................................................................................................................
    ss ..................... on w
    .............................................................................................................................................. t not
    the tHe d of
    28 e
    The
    any
    scovered n prosper.
    Marriage;
    e
    because
    owner s h
    secondeven cr
    s ab me
    name. Grounds;
    ofe f nvo
    the
    The for
    not
    thethe
    v ng refuses
    the
    Yes,
    (d)
    s
    Nullity;
    fo Nuisance;
    2.
    Contracts
    The
    of
    Edd
    legislative
    or
    h s
    tuat bad
    67
    ows:
    the
    Title
    of
    purpose
    r
    C Un
    un e.
    Annulment;
    r order
    Ern
    s this
    on
    Ownership; fa
    t
    aw
    The
    ted
    marr so to was
    (2005) of
    Fromth
    e e
    of
    material….
    do
    act
    States,deed
    agreement
    (1991) wh of
    on
    may
    agedec Legal
    the
    so, of
    concerned.transferr
    h
    Co-Ownership;
    Family ch 115
    the 85
    s
    Ph s of
    c
    Congress,
    nocon
    Separation and
    part.
    comp a ose sa
    Extinguishment;
    Quasi-Delict; factsm
    pp to It unt e
    after
    onger
    ng Dec
    nes
    is
    ng bu
    the
    a was The
    Redemption
    House; nant primarily
    that
    descr the
    Sup a
    d
    bealthough
    de.
    48 subm
    ser
    pathway,
    Mismanagement the
    va bank
    ng
    she
    seekstax co
    Condonation
    Proceedings; bed, ous
    (1993)
    dthe grotto has
    101
    y
    intended
    dec
    tted
    s put
    Not a a
    said
    quarre awsubstAgency;
    arat
    ready
    sub
    remedy;of to
    up wous
    (2000)
    of laws 11 the
    not
    ect
    sts,
    on,
    ,
    thefor ad
    nu
    b) mart
    adverse
    not
    ob
    by
    thereof
    made
    Ph
    annoy
    under
    Sonny
    the 3.
    was
    easements;
    stayed
    the
    part
    shou
    A
    stay
    furthermore,
    (b)
    exc
    rema
    any
    rely
    W
    consu
    became
    that
    d t bert
    Baby
    ma Pos
    gate
    How ty
    execut
    sregarded
    nto r
    ppmade
    t
    brought
    us
    property
    more
    "nat
    acqu Changea
    Explain
    shed ghtoned
    n n ar
    ta
    the
    Art.
    an ve
    ands or
    be
    ne can
    successfut
    n wn aw.an
    ona ve
    possess
    myse
    about
    dher
    at sva Bu
    June
    anddec
    and
    had
    access through
    attaches
    onaw
    off
    pub
    1545,
    t nex
    fferent
    Lu the
    the
    a and
    be
    rema
    onandacan
    d The
    under
    to
    cadopt
    vitiate u f
    and
    thereof
    en
    aw" the
    1989
    adverse
    more ned
    fraud?
    donatedstence
    a
    c.
    ofbackand
    toh s negat
    [2%]
    sued.
    excepts
    NCC.
    the
    road.on y n
    m, su
    subsequent
    st
    (Velasco to
    g
    from
    of
    ownersh dece
    to
    t and
    c status
    the
    ng ve
    on
    of t
    n
    he
    consent
    annotated
    can
    oftake
    or
    Don
    a
    the
    f Exp
    of the
    n
    rst
    va was ve
    se
    But.m of you
    Thus,
    ac
    possess acqu
    the t
    Torrens
    parents
    1957,
    decisions
    the the
    to therefore
    decedent a
    has
    that or
    contract
    d A
    care f
    tenement
    ng
    on sa
    v.
    p my
    n
    cert
    and
    when part
    p of any
    incontract
    edhad
    but sace
    y.
    Manilaseparate
    no
    Repub
    d the
    herhence, of
    t
    a
    as one
    on f subs upon
    the
    Sa ve
    es
    babyf other
    system
    r
    Name;aof
    cate
    the
    the the
    house,
    contract a
    w of
    where
    ght su
    ready
    be
    ate
    whod re prescr
    and
    the
    the and
    the
    stc
    Electric r
    marriage
    en t
    grantorva
    nofbet
    todoes
    Pres
    egated
    husband,
    before
    cense wport
    ng. has
    ust on
    of
    courts
    s of
    t onw dowed
    reta ots
    d not
    t
    doneewhere
    and ptdent
    y
    th
    ABC
    as
    e.
    ce sons
    the not
    ong
    the on
    wasnto
    n t s Under A.
    property
    was
    Marv
    Dom
    or
    ownersh
    Canada.
    SUGGESTED
    governed
    br
    t
    Change
    pet
    contracts
    Ph
    st
    X
    natura
    neg
    an
    borne
    reverted
    w
    the the
    each
    none n
    ocatme
    ncurab
    money ng
    pu
    and
    th an
    attr tThe
    apppp not
    and
    ect n c
    of
    onn
    at
    onof hY one e P10,000.00
    nes.
    bute
    hetos
    theary
    on aware
    to
    entered
    and
    e,
    thethe
    of or
    excectment
    p
    They
    cantof
    s apan
    because
    theby
    coconut
    andof
    ANSWER
    reopen
    a marr
    (1992)
    h
    nher
    year n r oftheory
    Name;
    prready
    spouses,
    dden
    nact
    us RAthe
    very
    pub to des ofmary
    both
    ownersh ve ted
    from A
    age.nto
    overcomec theand
    aw
    contract
    on re
    the rcase
    products
    treasure.
    own.
    y doma "a because
    t knewand
    Under
    from so
    a L
    adverse
    was
    of
    r S
    such was decree
    enab s t nes
    contract
    ght
    by nce much
    pn the fstoo
    9048
    However,
    h nat
    of
    that that
    Perc ed
    not
    effected
    saand
    s
    that both
    e
    presumedRA
    He p(
    the toan ona
    parents.
    e. AL),
    of
    andto
    aceby
    possess
    ong
    vaErn states
    has nsta
    the
    duty opt
    presumptrreg
    n adopt
    ofwou ty
    d Don
    of
    Austra
    respect
    eBM, a
    from
    them
    an
    andon
    market.
    strat
    sposab
    oser-spouse.
    en ed
    of d theory
    executthey
    Forty fore
    on Magno,
    dea aga
    contract
    parents
    (2006)
    r.,
    oys.
    ust by
    the
    maybeof
    were
    ona,
    ve
    on d the dgner
    e"
    of ed nst
    the
    on.
    Heed of
    fraud
    Yes.
    buyer s Car mora ignorance on oshas y turp
    (a) not n a tude;
    1973. purchaser
    commof
    ..........................................................................................................................
    ...........................................................................................................
    ................................................................................. the law
    tted n differs
    ....................................................................................
    any good breach, in fa th,
    legal
    ............................................................................................. or et effect (b) a one a29 F
    Marts
    comp
    Yes,
    however,
    b
    (2) Reg
    cannot
    defense nd p
    67 th de ster
    nong my s
    eted
    fay C
    adversely
    edupon be ofthat
    answer
    to t 116
    n a zen
    performance ng Deeds
    su
    the A tCertby
    andunreg
    and
    rnt85 w affect
    re
    ghts and
    her B ed
    obta st stered
    who of on
    marr
    those
    under on
    48 ned
    the be cannot the age
    the a
    sa
    the
    otfavored and, dde bas dbuyers. to
    vorce
    condom contract;
    same.be s a (Bael
    requthereof,
    prior F
    decree SUnder p
    nnce red no
    to
    um u.
    tassert ng the comp a nant sd ron ghts,
    damages(1997)
    Intestate
    Depositor’s Proceedings; Account under (2006) Jurisdiction
    Art cCommon e 1170(2004) yMarriage; Legal Ownership; Separation; Co-Ownership;
    Vicarious Declaration Extinguishment;
    Liability Redemption
    of (1991)
    Nullity
    Succession; (2000) Extraordinary
    Death;
    prescr
    v.
    be EM’s
    or
    between
    s
    horse
    prescr
    st
    Co.,
    not
    erected
    Applicable
    contract
    easements.
    SUGGESTED
    mother
    the
    to
    re
    Corporat
    4)
    make
    property.
    your
    contracted
    SUGGESTED
    ownersh
    explaining
    W
    Ph
    the
    enforced.
    was
    nformat
    and.
    ntent
    dentx
    nteract
    ncec)
    pu Court
    that
    them.
    ef y16]
    performed,
    prescr
    5 pp coupled
    anoma
    G.R.
    the
    mora
    answer. The
    arr
    fowner.
    bed
    ated;
    had
    born it
    1925, ona
    whenbe.
    ready The
    nes to theand
    on
    voidableby
    on
    executed
    p va
    months
    on
    No.
    owner aWhst
    nANSWER
    of
    The
    Sonny
    ANSWER
    bed. over
    who
    (Cadalinthedamages.
    act
    Reg
    (Articlehered
    y
    cons the
    n the
    has
    [1%]
    reg
    be
    June w Laws;
    with
    pu acont
    on
    feeAppeals,
    aga
    L-18390,
    granted, of e thsWh of
    laws.
    Afghan sat
    and stered
    ster
    D
    the
    a......................................................................................................................
    ed as F or
    a
    tuat
    theoex
    Eva
    owner
    andownr
    sought
    from
    (Art.
    marr
    emot
    der p and
    nst onready
    nued
    the
    rector
    tary ke e n
    1994
    no
    cou
    v. 1410;
    partSuccession;
    e
    of
    property.ng
    interest
    onHongkong,
    fe
    rema
    he
    POEA, s t."
    1390.
    stan,
    ona age a
    Auring.
    h n
    ca
    Deeds
    share
    n
    August d owner
    the ght
    to
    (342
    A
    ofnof
    mbeen
    of
    cu
    d s-not
    the
    that H the
    usufruct
    the
    and
    n
    hough
    Banaga
    yd work
    adverse
    Land
    n ar the
    ,date
    Ph(2001)
    d
    n
    andg
    for
    NCC).
    not
    238 sng
    presentaHe thenyrof
    law fnature
    shonesty
    SCRA does
    nce
    6,
    transm the -same
    another
    bad s(2%)U.S. ed
    To
    so,
    pp
    psycho
    the
    and.
    partakes
    on
    damages
    drug
    approved
    marr
    bother
    SCRA has
    1971) thereof
    is Intestate
    he e Per
    vs.
    nebaby cn not
    fanow the C
    state.
    f653
    g add
    evates
    on
    prob ta as
    nev
    was
    ed court
    ofthe ves
    th,
    762)
    The
    og
    vto
    a,
    Soler,
    m
    aw to
    any ypactum cFam
    ose
    forum. my
    to
    ca of
    n
    the
    d
    Code
    have
    tab .on
    ssuch
    p
    much
    em.
    buy sha on
    s....................................................................................................................
    and
    The
    w
    thethe
    race
    ed? yby
    3O
    her &
    ght e,s2 y appear
    sameNuisance
    A
    because
    corporat
    Cesar,
    owner
    the
    was
    persona
    SUGGESTED
    de
    an
    Remedies;
    has
    F
    9048
    (Grey
    Z
    otherw
    SUGGESTED
    whereby
    cons
    Therefore,
    w
    c
    2)
    s
    atn
    the f mp
    nf
    years
    OCT t
    drug
    the
    p fnquent
    8-year
    rxthoussous
    the
    an
    th rm
    zen.
    pchosen
    Intermediate
    and
    nos
    and the
    be
    suff ace
    perfected.
    yacc
    dered (2006)
    A can
    of
    w
    same
    tater.
    No,
    that
    se.
    means
    rear es,
    entba act
    ord
    by
    at on
    where
    Cancdent taw.
    thetof tper
    ANSWER
    oANSWER
    ent v.has
    the
    taxpayer
    was
    can
    375 was
    n
    ng the
    d a the
    on
    execut
    Judicial
    unreasonab
    ed
    these acob and
    De
    the
    11
    the
    censed
    tenement.
    (5%)
    orphaned
    po
    methat
    to
    at
    evde
    oftse been
    atter
    agreed
    the
    Bethe s
    spouses Thus,
    executed
    me
    pre
    Death;
    was a
    case
    sea,
    B
    to
    osh
    the
    and
    d
    dence.
    Appellate
    (2006) the
    cannot on
    Cruz,
    D
    serence
    where
    of
    treasure
    ed to fReconstitution
    beaskd
    Santos
    st
    fam
    youth
    fo
    cateat
    no
    or under
    to
    the sso
    h
    Effects;
    cance and
    that fboy
    ntestate,e.treated
    X To for
    m.
    17 Marv
    bar,
    transm
    ames
    owed order
    do
    and
    rAsy
    w
    he
    be
    of
    ved
    marr become
    X
    ght
    Court The
    and
    Phs
    m thefArt
    for th res
    ed
    sa
    w
    there
    no
    wou
    often bus
    Y,
    ed
    ght
    to nsue
    to
    charged
    Simultaneous by as
    age,
    .the cace
    cance
    or
    the then
    49
    ss
    andacqu w
    the
    and
    G.a
    onger
    v e
    bapt
    pass d has
    possan
    the
    nessg c
    on
    for
    hes17
    thdrew
    [1910}).
    pet
    bu
    deportat
    na
    R.
    n
    mmovab
    forma
    the no
    eff
    re
    grave
    s act
    the not
    abso
    of
    d of a
    at
    sma
    through
    b
    Transfer taga
    the
    L-74423 c n
    by onasma
    the
    rCode,
    y
    Death encybeen
    101
    ghtsbe a andute
    the
    tthe
    thenst to
    of
    es
    for
    on
    e
    3.
    1.
    s
    (a)
    A.
    O.G.
    [2000]).
    comm transferee
    from
    all
    a
    (2002)
    Presumptive
    cr
    Testamentary
    to
    nature
    SUGGESTED nceCONT
    ter those
    substant
    Car
    do Yes, Agency;Ignorance
    Inflation on tos
    4374) ssor of he m s who
    Legitime
    s as norpendente
    ...........................................................................................................
    ...........................................................................................................................................
    2. The
    XYZ .............................................................................................
    extr Corporat
    NUOUS ANSWER um a
    un
    wa ns
    or
    contravened
    ega buyer
    Guarantee (Reyesdesire
    on
    ty c
    or
    Deflation
    ver wh or
    (1991) va
    EASEMENTS
    (2001)
    . can That oron,
    sermistake
    that
    ch d n beto ty
    ous te?
    ncorporat (2001)
    bad hav
    the
    Commission
    ands saof
    have proh f
    bas
    contrary one,
    fa the
    cons your Puno, th. a b s on deeper
    to to
    derat
    ted The answer
    .........................................................................................
    of
    ng uan are fact.
    ........................................................................................................ ent s tenor w
    those (2004) The
    nu
    tow ced warrant
    Outline
    by th
    not Ph s
    on fy former
    the Franc
    understanding
    the
    aw. of
    ce s
    for
    the pp (a),
    use
    of so the
    neh
    The of s s . reg (b)
    DOM
    Sec.
    there
    to
    the the
    cert
    ssued
    29 67
    .....................................................................................................................
    Yes,Metrobank
    B.
    bunga
    New recover B Sup
    Marriage; of
    stered. f
    contr
    has Supreme
    the
    C C
    7(b),
    compcates
    Ownership;ow
    vby
    the L
    s co ARY
    Bn
    ownersh
    va no the
    bute
    Code. Art.D s
    hshou
    issues
    Legal a
    whereThe of d nant
    defense
    s can court
    THEORY
    access y t
    Co-Ownership;
    favor Court
    Separation; t d to
    one-year eof
    obta p
    orderpay
    touched 116
    they presented
    hav n
    the 86
    of 49
    the
    tothe
    s Vicarious
    ned decision.
    damages
    pos ng
    Grounds;
    untenab
    the New
    Wills;the
    presumpt
    se and,state
    Extinguishment;
    Redemption
    per byts
    expenses
    had
    deportat
    by Codicil; that
    Domestthe
    pub
    Liability
    shabuod by
    Prescriptive of t for
    e.ohnson H
    know
    of Mary
    Philippine
    (2002)
    on c [Civil
    the breach
    gh
    Institution
    wouAs (2001) redempton
    and ofc
    road,
    Loss a R
    d and.
    persona
    forAdopt
    edge
    Period good
    ru of se(1994)
    wh of
    have
    other e, of
    M th Co.,
    the Baron
    an
    ss
    ch onor s
    e)
    of
    2. court
    ext
    been
    true
    a
    8CRA
    days
    2
    (Art. enr
    farm
    usufructuary
    (Handbook
    prosper.
    wou
    case
    Me
    SUGGESTED
    donat
    rhusband
    codifying
    app
    younger
    Stated
    the ground
    the
    ghtrUnder v ch
    nct
    capaby. sweetheart,
    d n
    Si
    (1998) even
    to
    765)
    to otherw
    ce
    1129. n be
    under
    mak
    ons onese
    cons
    sTheve
    Uncollected H
    recover or
    app
    fthan the ee detr
    lawsANSWER
    made
    Sec ng
    of
    d,awarded
    ega
    second after
    prescr
    dered
    Cr(a) f
    a
    on LRA
    P.D.
    cat
    car
    wh
    v h andat
    menta
    more
    45 rse, separa
    sthe ght
    ng the
    on
    to
    chfather
    Code). her
    of pt
    Pr
    ob Adm
    the1529,
    prov for as
    sa on to
    purchase
    and
    ..................................................................................................................
    who sa no p expense
    on
    vate
    garbage
    scontract
    remaAct gate
    to death.
    a
    p
    ch
    thed on use,
    04
    ongernsnt
    "unreg
    ace
    and, her
    496, h
    donee
    more.
    nns under
    strator
    on
    dren t ffs
    s
    myse
    une
    thdonat rnternat
    of mora
    cont
    to ght
    spr
    therefore,
    unut “the r of
    Return
    the marr ght
    Ar
    So stered
    1967.
    performance
    the
    case,are ce another.
    f onto
    w equ
    to
    nuous they
    entry 55(5)
    zedand th
    effect
    ped to
    en
    ona
    revoked pay
    usng
    va On
    there va oy,
    cert
    untare
    shousp recover
    prand
    ofto dbe to
    you
    26 ent
    that t r r
    vate
    Law,
    aLu f Ar
    tuas
    her.
    andthe the
    ght
    sd ed
    be
    arebyof no Ph
    Don
    under
    offer
    cert
    godson
    prescr
    of
    a
    d
    There
    change
    SUGGESTED
    express
    commerc
    and
    Supreme
    abso atter
    n
    needed
    from
    found. (
    Effectivity
    annu
    rom
    year
    surv v)Title
    hous
    vorce
    1989, pp fs
    the the
    ved one
    ute cannot
    pr
    cates
    ment
    ater t
    Art.
    bed
    s nes,
    Uponng t
    of
    obta
    forst
    governmentor
    (1996)
    no
    ofthef
    devee
    by a
    to Rhoda.
    the pro
    ANSWER
    by pu 415cons
    of
    need
    forest
    of
    commun by
    name to
    bu
    theexecuted
    he
    severa ned recover
    nqu
    h at t
    the
    Court, ect
    husband
    opmentst49 t rs
    d (5)
    the on der
    e
    other
    sw by
    to
    12 ng
    ry, S of of
    purposes,
    of
    rExp ck obta
    w marr
    Bes of
    nce
    thatty F
    reopen ng
    exp
    Gav
    eg aws
    th
    for
    Marcethe
    Romu
    father,
    Death; or the
    des of
    sthehas nned
    t86 that
    the
    Y d
    age?
    therat
    no,
    property
    matemora
    deemed Man
    property
    of dn
    weNCC,a
    theacc
    o. on
    not
    cons
    but
    no the
    BM,
    Effects; who
    Off he
    ser Kuwa The
    sett
    ch a
    Mar
    reg denta
    earns of
    capac
    ce
    the
    Ph
    pr (Cesar)
    the
    ous
    Sr.derat
    character to da ed
    dren from
    nc
    or at
    ed
    stratthe
    atter
    of contract
    Bureau
    pp
    have
    SimultaneousEachmach
    thru
    affa
    s and
    that
    p death
    on
    tate
    the
    on
    the nes,
    con
    and e ab 10-day
    on s
    wants
    r a
    for
    taken
    ru theva
    wnery
    sha
    eft C
    ugaofthee of
    th v of
    of a d
    On governed
    of
    Family
    ob how
    does
    S
    A
    Possession
    resc
    (1994)
    Heirs; nce
    bert
    wh the
    gat can
    ss Substitution
    101 other
    on/reso
    on. Code; the Not hand,of ght
    .......................................................................................................................................
    ...........................................................................................................
    ...........................................................................................................................................
    ................................................................................
    not ch the to excuse
    s break
    by decree
    or may utHeirs
    Retroactive Sw
    h on
    be ofs party
    of
    be B ss
    (2002) Pac
    ng s d
    sought aw,
    ncessant, vorce
    defense f a co as
    by
    contract
    Application; co-owner
    ....................................................................................
    from t be w the obta th
    of ngthew legalpar the ned
    thout the vendor.ng de p by
    aw thea nt
    cto
    party, 29
    ff,
    On us Marriage;
    beg of
    Mar
    contract;
    status
    Act,
    resu
    embe
    not
    A. Cert
    Paras).
    wh M 67
    The
    Jan.30,
    ch ce nssan fss
    Legalts cate
    then
    Possession were
    and Un
    of
    marr a
    shment
    to n and
    Separation; en
    the the
    run of
    1989
    verse?
    returned
    r age cghts
    who T (c)
    createan.
    defendant
    from of e
    169
    can Mutual of (TCT)
    possesses
    the
    Wills;117 th
    on Hence,
    to
    reg be
    SCRA
    a a
    PubVicariousof
    th person
    Formalities
    guilt n.
    strat
    annu No. a
    ng
    s 5% 617).
    co
    Ph
    (2006) ega t
    a
    conduct 4576
    owned
    Extinguishment; shou
    was
    Liability
    on. ed, pp
    are the
    (1990) easement. nneswas
    because d a
    governed
    qua (2002)
    th n
    andbe mortgagee
    ands ssued
    common f case, cat
    hav Loss; n The e a by
    ons ng nt
    Thus,
    part
    Philippine
    property
    P100 The
    c)
    prom
    A
    Forgery;
    (Ladera
    extr
    3)
    country tsnd
    aw ex
    wthe FORUM
    pendens donat
    andtmerging
    ns was ssory
    on
    become
    b a
    cfe"
    The vs. the because
    when
    some born
    shou
    on deed
    on
    Civil
    Innocent Hodges wasNON
    note
    pub underspouse s
    ad aLaw,
    tres
    th va
    st
    nu of
    cOrF
    be D, CONVEN
    ssyou (CA)
    po d
    sance
    someth p Vol.
    so mortgage
    annotated
    E
    Purchaser;
    Agency; and no cyand 48dwho st 2.but
    dgovern atbfof F ENS
    fng nd
    p.7) twere ng
    pub was
    substant fthat ng,at
    contracted ofmeans
    affect
    ng Mirror the
    connot
    raan be
    was the
    LFauct natura ng
    backproper pa ng
    Real not cr no s y
    ton an mmp of and
    zed act
    na
    and
    the y y Un Sect
    fa
    ALTERNAT
    proh
    SUGGESTED
    capac
    emp
    rh
    must
    per
    free
    Magno nnocent
    prescr ghtfu th verse.
    od, Estate on
    patentbwh
    oyment bed
    tatedted
    be
    sto owner ch , VE
    he
    parents Art
    purchaser
    The ANSWER can bust
    ANSWER
    drugs.
    grant cMar
    nsta wc marr
    breached of e thon the s XV,
    the ed
    nffrom y
    Mar When to age
    2004, be
    for
    same further
    Mortgage
    ot? by remarrytess
    the overthrown
    ofssva the
    Exp
    the he an
    the ue
    because
    Bureau Guapa prov
    has a sa po
    opt acqu
    (Art.
    n. en
    owner Fbeen cedes
    (2%)
    on of underby
    woman res
    more26.found
    Lands that:
    contract.
    stay asZY
    of (2004)
    Fam wh good
    than ngto the ch a y
    (1%)
    theownersh
    57
    effect
    notw
    "where
    equa
    to
    Aruego).
    deve
    records
    December
    operat
    damages.
    now
    be
    Hence,
    b
    present. ands."
    protected?
    SUGGESTED
    (1998)
    c)
    Us
    (1998) ust
    ntervent
    o
    ng
    6P500.00
    presumed
    cert same
    Death
    ng?
    Impossible
    contrary,
    he
    opment.
    thstand
    tbeyNo.
    ve fru
    a tonThe
    FC
    untenab
    p
    thereof
    faExp
    cate untts,
    saof
    nstead,
    he
    on
    atand
    ANSWER
    w
    1967, requ
    and
    Exp
    ...........................................................................................................
    spet
    (United
    d
    d of
    and
    (1999)aw;
    froma ng
    Service
    owe
    east
    towards
    to ofedwas n. possess
    tTh
    ..............................................................................................................................................
    ...........................................................................................................................................
    consequences
    and
    may any
    tnota no ab ton
    e.
    and
    durat
    have
    Op
    s
    s
    he
    n. tsrty
    (5%)
    .......................................................................................................................................................
    Sony the n Canada of his manager (1993) e
    made
    e
    Wh
    ha
    xteen
    canceng
    "mode"
    act
    the (5%)
    must
    the cou
    chosesha
    conduct
    a
    na
    surv
    Airline
    on
    for
    years
    on,
    similar
    snEM’s
    when
    of
    he
    e vendor
    U.S.
    r..................................................................................................................
    ght to on summary(16)possess,
    Cert
    ed
    (Art.
    be as
    ac
    be
    damages
    man,
    apan
    ved
    makes
    to sbad
    be
    that a
    after
    the on
    years
    by systems.
    v.
    connect
    regarded
    check,
    aw
    fee
    17.
    ed ru wh
    cate
    who
    the
    onger? musforma
    A canCA,
    .......................................................................................................
    not frecogn while w
    e,
    and.
    1st
    oofhe
    the
    e
    ke
    th zed
    part
    der
    Artof
    under
    be
    reasonnes
    be
    appears
    a
    easement
    the
    par.
    ust nh G.R. had
    t."
    T
    [3%]
    as pet
    latter s en
    cbrough
    than
    one here
    es ne,
    (an
    envokede
    C
    factsttort
    AL)
    Art.
    who v
    eft,
    the
    on
    No. for
    26
    as to n
    maythat there
    August
    V
    proceed
    Reg
    the
    and
    rece
    partnersh
    c
    for
    C.
    Th
    Cesar
    the
    of
    Conditional
    been
    Definition;
    Lands
    p
    owner
    Laws
    After
    s
    du
    the
    and
    fot
    h
    mprescrzab
    v
    mrg
    ace.
    not
    sy
    sPh
    29
    a Pr
    buyers
    usufruct
    once secretary
    strar
    name ve
    n
    recogn
    ceremony
    buyer s
    aw
    F
    to
    o
    e as
    coupayment
    of
    a(1990)
    ntado’s
    Marriage;
    dec app
    cannot
    afforded
    10,the
    Therefore,
    estate
    p
    ngs,
    pub the
    devastating
    pt
    usufruct
    of no
    such,
    pass
    remarry.
    p ne
    ded
    dof
    have
    1987,
    of n support
    ofno
    zed h
    sbut
    and,
    good
    nat
    Non-Bigamous
    Cognovit;
    and
    and
    ty
    cons
    Edd
    breach
    askaw
    s
    Manda
    the
    gace
    upon an
    onger
    for the
    another
    thedom
    ona
    the
    somet
    wh ns.
    eg each
    has
    ebratedw
    ex
    Leopo
    e.
    117
    for
    ed
    The
    refuses
    fathe
    st
    opportun
    of
    50 rh
    tw
    property
    storm
    ch
    by ofstence
    been
    Th ng
    th.
    cce
    ght
    a
    uyong
    dthe
    mate
    n
    the
    who
    VicariousWills;not
    fact
    construct
    h e
    pet
    spose
    of
    mes
    Marriages
    the
    do,
    of
    1986,
    86 sa
    to
    Borrowing c
    s
    way
    be to
    Government.
    12 n them
    nwhen
    cance
    or
    tva
    that
    causing
    bank open
    sdaughter
    contract
    th
    govern
    ear
    of
    Cebu
    Extinguishment;
    Holographic
    ma demand
    ty
    has
    ng
    68
    on
    stop shou
    sof
    the
    qua
    Liability
    C a Petron
    y
    dwh
    Death;
    the
    (2006)
    for
    ty
    so,
    defense
    Property;
    to or at
    on,
    to
    depos ts
    cont
    permanent or
    ntended
    and
    C by
    fpnst
    ty
    ch
    dMrs.
    the
    on yw
    ed
    (2004) D
    tyace
    Wills;
    was
    under
    deemed Y
    widespread
    of
    e
    that
    Statute;
    ust
    free
    nuous
    ane,amay
    w
    rector
    th
    Realof
    tute
    d
    ts,
    to
    s
    Effects;
    Novation
    the tenab
    ntr
    be
    to
    of
    son.
    Don
    vs.
    Ern for
    adopt a one
    ns
    su
    the
    the
    has
    co-
    beto
    hsof e ce
    sst;
    The Vested
    Sweet
    On
    or
    c
    fw
    Months
    term
    124110, However,
    favorab
    that
    represented
    the prosecut
    Canad
    Principle
    Bruce
    overseas
    5)
    ra mpa
    subsequent
    Senen
    2.
    g
    B
    and
    Examinations
    (OCT) a h
    ves
    ng
    ed g
    sed, 7
    Apr
    Suppose t act
    na
    adoptee
    ms. n w t
    ssues
    s September
    acance
    rs
    nate5 on e Taste
    an
    s
    proceeds
    The
    seeks
    years
    expressed
    th yon
    the
    passedRights
    court
    e t15,
    at
    they
    April on a to
    gated
    On
    the c
    (1991)
    workers.a
    P-2277
    her the nvo ntusufruct
    aat
    1980,
    reg
    comfort
    LRA by szen
    marra
    m
    Reg th
    appea
    me
    20, and
    emp ton ev
    butthe (2000)
    ........................................................................................................................
    reg the may stered
    me
    and
    part
    ted
    ved. s1971,
    stered Adm unborn
    he
    had
    deswas at
    ster
    2001). case
    Rene
    dent
    Art.
    age bound
    itsof
    thereof r
    oyment heres
    use
    uanand
    passed
    t , can
    parents
    the
    occurrence reon a
    trend. of 17,the
    Perc
    bought
    owner,
    ssued stofand
    from
    n sDeeds.
    en
    strator
    never
    to of
    fe be
    under
    t chby for
    me
    prov
    the mpos
    oyment
    return s va
    not
    upon
    the It const
    Ange
    orthe
    appd,
    Estate
    nsurance n the annu
    nva the
    of
    o
    serv of
    bothered
    is fthe
    des ce
    guard but
    then
    farm fa acontract
    ed
    t he
    speciallythe
    ed
    toh
    n executtuted
    na
    on
    d,and
    parce
    th
    ent ment
    of
    that
    names of
    thea
    ra on
    cause
    her beto
    po
    ..................................................................................................................protest
    were
    ans upon
    death
    the
    conducts sha
    sed y
    from
    estate. Span
    to
    ma evy
    our
    to
    ng over
    get
    natura cy of
    on
    of
    of but
    f
    at n
    intendedthethe the
    hon
    be ts
    sh
    by
    the a sst F has
    exc The
    M
    good
    State
    and
    adequate
    ALTERNAT
    SUGGESTED
    Code).
    the
    tenement.
    (Art
    under
    w
    probated
    SUGGESTED
    k
    a
    reconst
    reconveyed
    adm
    Thus,
    transfer 10
    (a)
    patent
    have
    res ega
    notw
    for kae
    p
    th
    ometer
    ready years
    Suppose
    us dent not
    act
    c a
    no h n
    law fa
    attere oc recogn
    trade,
    Chapter
    the
    ve
    an s
    thstand
    strat on syet
    th
    ean
    1324,
    tut
    becausean does
    aunt
    and
    and VE
    students
    estate
    of n for
    c
    proof
    have ANSWER
    ANSWER
    genera onger.
    as
    was
    on ANSWER
    Canada, ve even
    a
    the t
    that
    to
    notor not reconveyance
    they
    who,
    en
    convey m
    tC zes
    ofnot
    ngV e
    the a
    proceed of101
    vh
    Ph
    va a
    at
    t hof
    ousto
    Swready
    ,
    Who commenced.
    red
    adv
    ru defense
    bad
    from
    s CA
    s the
    mmed
    Code)
    however,
    rea
    ued the the
    automat
    pp
    a ss
    e aches,
    possess
    Nobody, ost Appointment
    141
    ready sas fa
    shou
    and tnes.
    owner.
    at ngawF
    property.
    e
    thecattme or th.
    apsed
    from ate ps
    notdoes d
    destroyed
    prov
    P500,000,00, on ca
    she however,
    no
    However,
    stewardess
    cou
    provinces va
    covered
    e however,
    based
    y
    preva
    re the
    ranch
    under Under
    y
    demo d fam
    s
    d
    not
    obta
    ded atthe However,
    of nce
    but make
    hard ves
    except a
    12 a? ground
    byn nedy
    ocated
    bona the
    n
    Torrens
    who,ow
    (5%)
    cou
    mp
    nobody
    Sub-Agent
    the
    shed s
    y
    and
    Repub aor as
    v on herweak
    afford
    the
    onew Ru
    ease
    de date
    one-
    d
    ed the
    very t n es a c
    by app
    B.
    subd
    2.
    does FORUM
    TheXPh
    agreement cab
    Simultaneous
    vconstitute sor
    for one warehouse to w
    the NON her th runn the
    acqu Death case CONVEN ng ne
    .................................................................................................................................
    ..................................................................................................................
    ........................................................................................................................................... an sbu and (2000)
    wtghbor on tht no the
    ENS the
    by
    ................................................................................................................
    excuse of ng dbetween the
    .........................................................................................
    and is vorce
    means
    and,
    Pedro subd
    a legal Pangas
    and v obta s
    on that onbof ndned
    the ofnan ang no equ
    accord
    Pub
    Romu
    va
    the
    t destruction
    or ands
    Landst t not?
    depends
    e dd beneftab
    nterest co
    even ng
    ty and
    o30 fng Why?e
    because
    of edw npr t bu
    to
    f the
    theon
    of in
    hea n nc the
    preva d
    (5%.) four
    comp
    Manue theaw
    Ph wps ngs the
    forma e
    the 50 c. to
    117 pp Central
    of . a n
    Artorder
    rcumstances r prosecute
    nes.
    nt
    Under
    unt Man aches
    ghtfu 68 t
    c
    87 for
    ese Luzon
    agreement
    he a.
    16 of annu
    Art wh
    owner May Ph
    reaches of c ch
    and provinces,
    of
    e ment
    the the
    pp of can the
    650 recoverne adopted
    between
    the30
    New Juridicalconvert
    of
    case. aw,
    of yrs. ot. OCT C the the asv n f
    are
    sa Code),
    D
    can
    marr
    the
    Bart. the
    ALTERNAT
    1314,
    (1)
    Insertions
    Personal
    have
    property
    a
    Mortgage
    baby
    December
    ad
    proh ust
    ur
    and SCONT
    ege
    ndebtedness. year
    sd7
    acent t f
    be buyer,
    n
    (1994)
    executed
    (1999)
    w b me ng
    edf
    The had
    ct C Property
    fa
    nanceth
    tstentpar
    &
    he v
    ve pp
    from
    that
    to
    on VE
    they (b)
    NUOUS
    Cancellations
    ed
    that
    under
    a
    occupants.d
    Law
    an
    uncance
    and Code.
    25, nes,
    ANSWER
    even
    bu
    aws dewasPh
    (1995)
    Lot abthe tohas by
    ntra-uter
    contracted
    who
    uAny company
    d 1998. s cto e B
    concernthepp
    when
    ng date
    EASEMENTS
    Sect
    now ab
    comp
    the
    underwh(1996)
    n ne
    have e marr
    ..............................................................................................................................
    each other ed
    sexcess thereon
    The n He ts
    chwon
    not of
    husband
    governed
    a ur aw,
    to
    y
    ne Art.
    thout
    pos the
    favor
    he
    annoyance
    ng sd
    ce
    of
    eft age
    108
    sha wtake by
    had
    fe
    t and
    persons, 1314.
    ct
    of th
    extra
    onssuance
    beh arerecourse
    a
    the anof on mp over
    marr
    to of
    been
    s
    be byde
    sthe those
    not
    nd easement
    pendens s
    ud
    support The
    aff
    ng cat P.D.
    the
    and very
    author
    the a
    age c
    peacefu
    ven of cond
    ess
    dav on
    con
    a wh
    bas aga
    ast the
    system
    the
    rcame Sonnyand
    to1529
    t
    acts, ch
    than t
    uga
    s
    zed wnst on
    or
    theof of
    carea No,
    of
    c)
    F hab
    Applicable
    may
    grant
    owners
    (3)
    Obligations
    or
    Characterization(1994)
    Pedro
    SECOND
    based
    ALTERNAT
    foundat
    SUGGESTED
    sett
    buys
    house
    a nsofar construct
    Court,
    the
    p
    trcraft the tua
    ed
    Supposingno acka them
    and prom
    upon
    execut ready
    as who
    content
    ALTERNAT
    on
    that
    becauseC fregres
    Marriage;
    VE they tof
    w the
    ANSWER ve
    ANSWERS
    zen.
    ng of a dence.
    sed
    sexua
    thout one Laws;
    represent
    (2000)
    onknowadopt
    r
    propertytrust,
    e
    the ght
    onsVEProperty
    of to
    ement
    that
    accord who see
    She ANSWER edge
    of
    y-transm
    natthe gThe
    of Wills;
    wh prov
    laws
    ve Vicarious
    ngPr Relations;
    way.
    may
    on.
    csa ch
    102
    must of
    Carlosthe
    ng NAT
    Holographic
    ntado
    h
    oses the e. ded
    Property;
    on
    prescr
    equ s
    Accord
    otogoverning
    Extinguishment;
    contro
    be
    ss
    General n ONAL
    Liability
    grandson Void
    property,
    f h the
    ty b
    rstthat
    areturn,
    them, re s Real
    bes
    e
    accepted Marriages
    Wills;
    s eased
    eyes ng d
    prove TY
    (2006)
    untenab
    part vs.
    ng h
    concerned,
    sease
    Agency they
    n y, s THEORY,
    Personal
    Witnesses
    ten a
    hence,
    tmate to country
    Payment
    nterest
    t
    was of
    by(1991)
    car nhave
    (10)
    on
    sha
    facts e.
    vs. the
    the the
    an saa f
    S
    make
    parce
    from
    hear
    proceed
    d
    share
    w
    court
    Nestor,
    2.
    mortgaged
    Inferior
    d)
    defense.
    and
    ssue
    Additional
    mother.
    Me
    abroad nconssqua
    nce
    th
    The v Capacity
    upon Aur
    hngs
    n.
    the
    Berof .goodshas
    basas
    T
    fwh
    There w ngs.
    ng
    ed
    prescr
    Answers:
    by t
    tafter
    the
    Courts
    prov
    had
    e
    fe, sthe
    shou ch h
    her
    d to w
    of
    property vs.
    app sbeen
    scret
    was has th promdue
    nher
    pt on dab a,our
    former
    Capacity on.
    cant be ayand
    an
    no onary not tses.
    drug
    ty co-he
    noted,
    Labor
    access from
    construct
    s
    .................................................................................................................................
    ...................................................................................................
    ...........................................................................................................................................
    ..................................................................................................................
    ................................................................................................................
    to s s vothe ons d. and of (Art. Art.and
    of th rea
    has
    ce
    Fadd argued
    to sXYZ
    Mar
    35, p
    author
    a
    816,
    or
    son,the
    rAct
    not
    cno
    however,
    aws; to
    property Fam
    of
    h may
    aCorporat rom the
    ve W
    andnnocent
    shusband
    (1996)
    passed
    C
    that Peter.
    ty
    successors
    v de y hy, he ust
    Per to
    Code,
    sw
    ghway.
    Code)
    asvery that nce
    me
    on
    to th arequ spouse
    the
    dec wou
    an n Peter
    oof
    wou sa
    Bthe
    Any
    re
    nehe
    ng
    nthedddt tbe ecPr
    30
    of
    to
    T
    d
    Act
    shou
    the
    even
    she
    (a)
    a)
    she
    Sup
    1.
    the
    New
    Code
    of
    an
    contract
    ha
    g
    ...............................................................................................................
    ch
    No, (v)
    aeg
    fr
    executive her
    feed
    vorce
    ve m fe
    Yes,
    age
    ends.
    act d,
    The Un No.
    has
    375
    marr
    mach
    th
    co
    An
    to
    o
    of dYV,
    C
    de
    mate
    aon m w
    acqu
    app
    ted
    vV
    aher
    does
    the
    act
    and
    prov no fLeopo
    9048.
    andrg
    th
    parce
    between
    ed
    for
    the
    nquency,
    nher
    EASEMENT
    neryCode,
    50
    y
    on
    ownch
    sand
    States rega
    Petron Pr
    tnot
    stered
    hero
    des
    e TCTn husband
    on
    con to can
    ntado
    was
    ectment, tthe
    dren He
    th
    do fam
    of o
    fromglegislative
    stand
    recover
    former
    68 the
    sn
    BFAR
    uga
    No. 117
    ve
    sownersh
    va
    thata
    athe
    and Man
    to
    case.
    favor
    exact
    attachedand y.
    was
    V
    eged
    BM,
    easement
    serv 4576 d ng beatssa
    nher
    the c
    rg
    propertyand
    or
    n a-
    Unfortunate
    y
    Erm
    owner
    has of
    assmate
    87for
    ng ntr
    d
    paddress.
    nr.?
    remarry. on
    apan-Man
    thattcourt
    Reg
    on t,
    or
    X. the
    servon
    up
    the
    been
    t ta,
    branches
    nsn y
    cane
    the
    May What
    the a of
    y schna. hof
    benef
    ssue
    sMan
    capac
    tude
    fas
    scssub
    per
    to V xed
    r
    ane,
    U
    she
    barred
    wy,
    ground
    Art. a
    va
    That
    P1
    ncent
    ght
    a dofod tawm fe
    nvo
    Hans
    rst
    t
    a
    ect
    a.
    condu
    ty
    a
    26 m
    so.
    manner,
    who
    of
    every
    of
    of so
    s
    ty
    route.
    Thnto
    by
    ved
    to
    name
    of
    to that
    way on.
    12 s
    y,thean
    t, of s
    each are
    partnersh
    cons
    sett
    of
    part decree.
    second
    (1994)
    Property
    1.
    one
    occupy
    SUGGESTED
    seven
    by
    operates
    des
    and
    possess
    4)
    sme
    mortgagor.
    or mposed
    ts the for
    reg used
    ab (1995)
    burdened
    ement.
    the der
    Special
    stance
    ttestament
    es other
    on.
    must (1997)
    rh COMMON
    strat ng
    months
    f
    to shand
    ty
    on
    property by
    ng at
    as p
    ch
    etter
    (Art and
    ANSWER
    both
    subm on s on
    Agency
    thereof.
    be nterva
    the
    property
    that
    n
    mmed dren
    construct not
    c carw
    1985, cu
    substant es contract
    of
    and
    tm n th LAW
    the
    spouses
    or the prescr
    n t wh
    pr
    (1992)
    1327.
    wh ate s
    vat serv
    keep
    transact
    a
    whHe and
    they
    pro-vnc
    coveredevy
    rCode ve
    ch ch
    refers ng
    genera
    y pays
    ch
    memoranda. a p ng the
    tude.
    bed
    1391,
    afterdepend
    not
    he she
    e
    on
    acqus
    as
    have ded
    of w nce
    ons that
    tofu
    cethby
    execut
    bequeathed
    the to by The
    the had
    theC f
    the
    red the 1947 contract
    a upon
    ment
    ................................................................................................................
    for venue
    there
    of or
    rea
    nterfere v transgressor
    traditional
    usufructuary
    Torrens
    ameans
    execut
    ts
    the Code).ust
    on
    subsequent parce
    nstruments was
    contents
    estate was
    r theof can
    statute.
    ob bought a ofwh
    but
    on acts
    T of
    ect not
    the
    due t
    h ch
    by e. s offer on
    marriages
    has
    years
    Gene
    (Arts.
    defendant
    the
    there
    SUGGESTED
    strengthen
    that
    B
    appropr
    nu
    The
    SUGGESTED
    the udgment
    (5) n Marriage;
    ntado
    Pr
    cou
    trecognme the
    The
    sance partobatter dvate
    shou
    contrast from
    and
    489
    d be
    before
    he p other
    gat
    not
    ate
    free omat
    of Psychological
    hav ng
    comes w d
    perand the
    ANSWER
    ANSWER ane,
    debtor
    nternat
    e on
    that (2003)
    have ts
    put
    proceed
    patentng no
    ther hand,
    Wills; c
    pass date
    Marvin
    spec 492,
    seto so F
    fa re
    the
    show
    a
    home Joint
    pay
    party.
    been thator
    onadar ed
    the at
    reasonab
    fpp of postu
    Incapacity
    p Sower;
    of C ca no,
    ng h vons
    Wills
    comp Vicarious
    tossuance
    ng
    tythe
    could
    orge barLaw
    s
    unaware
    drunk.shou ythere Good
    that met
    Code).
    pay andates
    (2000)
    successor
    prov nw
    va a
    exam (Conf
    s e
    d th
    Liability;
    Faith/the
    she Liability;
    and
    for
    nant ue
    102
    communicate
    c5% h actof
    manthat
    be
    des gh of the theBad
    of
    nat got
    facts
    does ve ct
    Powers wou
    such
    y
    abated.
    that on t
    the
    prLease;
    Public
    Faith
    or y Ph
    ons.
    ofn
    rregu marr snotg
    nt d
    how
    promote
    guard the
    port
    nterest.
    of
    (1) pp
    (2000)
    naUtility
    ng
    When Joint
    asserthaveed
    ar the
    Can nes,
    the aw
    on
    he
    his s n
    ce
    U.S.
    to
    3
    Pangasbenef
    capac
    Nestor
    Art s
    ur ebra
    nterposes testate
    consu
    no sd
    c
    that Juridical
    e aw
    ctctate aon
    onger
    That
    28 ar
    nanthe on towed of and
    oes.
    you s(1994) over hthe
    her he sparce
    Capacity;
    the
    and saCan on ent
    h ntestate
    marr oppos
    contract
    C am
    sha towhether van W
    nor,
    cause to on age Natural ma
    remarry.
    because do tof the
    be success
    on, shaheof
    th successfu
    or ng
    wh ac
    Personsact
    s, matter,
    contend
    not be 19
    pend
    ch on on tTo on;they
    construed
    states or
    years
    (1999)
    was when ng ega
    yrema
    contract the
    ng cou ca that:
    not of m
    tto court
    dnthat age
    sas ofa
    the and
    remarry
    was
    sounds
    prescr
    wou
    sta a
    contract
    The
    anyway,
    nher erFC, Rhoda
    rof
    ..................................................................................................................
    government opposed
    d ghtbed
    demand. govern:
    trespect from runder of
    zed
    must
    hebydANSWER cu the
    cannot Sect
    enters
    BM, by ous
    ve
    agreed be eg
    Ph
    a) Con Mar
    Sr.? ty t48
    respected.
    The
    parents come
    and the mate Government ou
    o ne sva to the
    and swho to ch
    Law.d extreme
    enact w Pub the
    ty
    and d, aof a
    c Ph
    thus nher
    d med
    Land
    the
    conducts to
    a fference? ypp se tnher
    Actdpart
    contract?
    special nes ffthe thecu a twh to oftthe law to
    Action(d)
    (b)
    of
    cannot
    be
    affect
    as
    separa
    shou
    context
    Decisions
    Are
    often,
    from
    (1996)
    (2000)
    wou
    part
    founded
    w
    Lo
    propert
    6)
    taxes
    marr
    sens
    pub
    acqu
    that
    recover
    now.
    governed nc
    and
    acceptance
    (Sa man.
    we No,
    fam
    uded
    ta decisions
    n
    enforced
    onga. d
    of
    exerc Liability
    Agent
    c b
    one-ha age
    d snthe ng
    stand Un are
    have
    y
    PARTNERSHIP
    order,
    tonthethe
    Quezon
    as
    After y
    prof
    es,
    appson
    of
    (Art.
    parents
    ve w on ncase
    ted
    onse
    (1994)
    unreg
    mus co
    acted
    doubtfu1
    under th law
    Prthe
    Art
    recipients
    answer
    the
    nterests,
    rea (2001)
    prescr
    y:f 615,
    trendered
    quas
    the
    aga
    of
    pubof
    of
    vate
    hear
    ects
    the from Car
    have
    cas
    ...............................................................................................................................................
    ...........................................................................................................................
    Primary
    wh marr nnocent ch ...................................................................................................................
    .....................................................................................................................
    age a ows purchaser
    subsequent evenEntry of
    (1)contracts
    bas Cthe e
    the
    stered
    and the
    and
    fraud,
    easement
    nst
    ty.
    of
    use
    n cC
    distinct
    -de ptthe
    415
    ng,
    H
    wou
    s po
    been Sa
    badv
    hCourt
    proceeds
    that On
    nternat
    the
    ega
    persona
    of
    by’s
    on the
    donat
    and sbe of the
    ct,
    renta Code)
    es cy
    the
    d
    thewhen
    own
    and
    aw
    a une
    has fa
    brough
    and
    prom not
    from
    buyer
    orassum
    en
    of
    deliberately
    and
    the
    ob
    court nc.
    dur
    ........................................................................................................................................
    Free Patent th on
    forego are
    ssued
    ona
    equ
    s
    sett 1,
    under
    LRA
    oyment
    a
    abe
    Appeals
    ..........................................................................................................................
    for a y va Book;
    en contracted ue who ,(L wrongdo
    shou through
    gat
    therefrom.
    a
    good
    ready
    Newways
    ng
    ssory
    n budan
    legislation;
    1990,
    no by stab
    The
    whose
    can ng
    the
    ng
    the onabroad
    Law.
    Adm
    donat
    ng the Acquisitive
    subject
    na
    d Sect the
    C
    that
    e,
    customs
    ast
    ......................................................................................................................................................
    the aws of apan
    same.
    dur
    the
    Ph
    be to
    by
    er
    set
    settsa
    when
    note.
    v
    considered
    distorted
    vs.
    ng,
    per ns
    two-year pay
    adverse
    nc
    n han
    ong ng
    p,
    on
    ons
    resoe
    name
    proper
    pp
    Code,
    dG
    Sweet
    strator
    Later,
    andn
    ngs. it
    od such
    uded Th
    ous
    was
    194
    23
    and
    to51.
    The
    nes ,by
    the
    the of
    ve to
    on
    s notes
    y paper
    (Sec.
    Is
    same
    B.
    acqu
    the
    Pub
    encumbrance
    SUGGESTED
    one
    sha
    testamentary
    ho
    cert
    of
    YV
    that
    Eng
    used
    the
    Laws)
    h
    SUGGESTED
    entered
    not
    adverse
    withdrawal
    any th
    durat
    adopt
    ownersh
    spe
    Nestor
    (b)
    and
    the
    n
    ts
    Leopo
    and
    kew Yes,
    such
    sthere
    s d the
    can
    tota from
    Assum
    vo
    demo
    propert
    co.
    ng
    fgrandson
    and
    ran he
    d
    at
    s se
    cate
    as ght
    29,
    on
    pso
    and
    tbe
    covered
    whatsqua
    do
    Magno
    obta
    the
    possess
    d mere
    puba
    person
    (Note: ve
    the
    nherAre
    devea
    has
    apossess
    pnto
    a
    nnocent
    ab
    ofure
    other
    way
    of
    wh
    rRu
    onF
    earn 69
    ANSWER
    oftmarr
    prescr
    30 estab
    ght
    possibility
    ng
    pronounce. the
    es
    ned
    the
    property
    on
    c 118
    ftbeen
    s: ntp
    ceasesey twh
    Usufruct
    the e
    opment.
    acat
    the
    prov
    from
    Marriage;
    The States
    no
    mposed
    that
    on
    e.
    s
    by
    thereof?
    that
    auctt
    of ng of
    passed
    1}
    be 27).
    o,
    the
    unscrupulous
    age
    content
    contract
    though nat
    on.saTh
    both
    ch on pt
    c
    de
    Commshed
    way,
    the
    ownersh
    acob Cognov
    purchaser
    of
    not
    susta on.
    to v tson
    tBM,
    sacob
    d
    50
    heFree
    can
    zen.
    ons
    ona
    ng
    ftfor
    Marce
    be
    the
    cannot
    facto,
    n ru
    Psychological
    de on after
    andThe
    After has
    they trust
    Wills;
    pthe
    for
    under were upon
    ttee
    pub
    n
    ons
    e r.
    bases
    ned? st
    n
    usat
    Phty
    veryPatent
    b)
    shaa
    executed
    y
    sha favor
    assumes
    p
    DiscussThe
    t?by
    the
    thebeen
    them
    becausenoen
    ssuance
    Was
    Probate;
    sa offor
    earn
    possess
    c comp that
    and be
    87
    recommends
    damages. 2) pp an
    the
    for
    Exp
    Ph
    anda tak
    bed law
    Pr
    s spouse
    purpose
    be
    success
    nvoPh
    h of
    ser
    h
    Incapacity
    A annu
    102
    ne"fsthrough
    the
    separated
    Liability;
    examntado
    mmovab
    s
    possess
    ng he
    to
    va
    a
    two
    pp
    n y
    M
    governs
    Intrinsic
    ng a po
    that
    ces
    su
    nd",
    es
    schools
    governed
    benef
    pp n.
    contemp
    ngtheca
    of of
    the
    wned
    adopt
    Termination; marr
    ue. t;
    tof
    (2) ed
    nt
    nes
    up
    (5%) won of
    the
    on
    nat
    that
    such
    thezensh
    w seeks
    the
    Solidary
    Validity
    Bureauand
    aw?sa
    fraud.
    thout
    thatt.
    on
    n tto
    years,
    th
    age e
    from
    legal
    OCT east
    such
    forpost-
    atme,
    ons,
    es.
    and
    th
    the
    the
    for
    ch
    of
    onby
    a
    (4)
    p. at s
    103
    sub subsequent
    the
    "Unfa
    negot
    a
    SUGGESTED
    laws? CONFLICT
    though reg v 13
    ect-matter ra ew
    at compet
    stered ons that
    ANSWER tthe marr
    on was OF and. the
    of age, act a on Waiver she may
    LAWS.............................................................................................................................................
    t.................................................................................................................................
    the on the buA compensat
    nRub tagr tty deede by cu
    under tura of
    Pedro on needs Act be
    sa ,Reason to commerc e. 496 be ust
    after to
    Hence, pa y
    sof do d. andthe aof s
    , B c)of b)
    (e) ent
    search.
    appropriating
    Why?
    Edd The re eThe Expfand performance
    He edP1 sa a succeeds.
    ae n. M
    to
    mot P1
    (5%) X on onbillion
    Rights sha of to the n not dh for sm contract?
    equa b purposes
    nd
    ss on the shares, thec) 1/3 The
    of ground(2004)
    share relief of
    ru make
    words
    Taste
    Ange
    of
    there
    ALTERNATIVE
    Marriage;
    45_
    Prescription;
    d)
    reg
    (2006)
    (1990)
    (1997)
    SUGGESTED
    ba
    refers
    usufruct.
    prescription.
    c person
    1967
    cons
    to
    Cata
    reason
    persons
    sha
    December
    that
    s fet
    a
    ssues INTELLECTUAL
    e
    Meaance
    the
    mAPPARENT mtat SCRA
    me
    Forum
    stered
    does
    h va
    Liability
    Effect
    derat
    not
    Composition
    estoppe v
    ed.)
    n.
    no, na
    s or
    to
    knew
    Revan
    on aga
    n.w d
    of
    represent
    A
    of mach
    the
    be of
    was
    the 27,
    not
    of ANSWER
    Thesed
    acknow
    order
    of
    1993
    st
    w
    on
    ord
    ANSWERS:
    (1998)
    nst
    persons n
    ofnon
    Death th
    the pu
    ...................................................................................................................
    universal
    rendered on 1972),
    app
    away conform
    be D Laches
    the
    Adm
    marr
    nary f
    nat
    Hence the
    prescr
    yatrst
    rectorthe
    of
    ng ng y
    purchase
    edged
    brother on
    ............................................................................................................................................................
    ........................................................................................................................
    Donations conven ons
    contract.
    Agent PROPERTY
    n
    are n
    sensspouse
    Land
    to age sa Bagu
    strat
    ega
    Baby
    andv
    part
    breg
    neffect of (1998)
    d o
    (1997)
    charged
    ng
    of b woneco
    Lands
    chens
    Transportat
    at
    ,
    of stered
    ve does
    of
    and
    canno th
    o,
    the
    t by
    sha
    pr
    egArtvs.
    ons
    Bruce,
    es.d. lawve our
    party
    Rene
    Code ce tprom
    step c Orre
    s
    ordered
    w f of not
    mate
    by t be eas
    Partnerships; theC th
    testamentary
    now a
    demandab
    owner
    s the
    Sect
    1314
    fso
    as vto ana.
    distinctconst
    on egadoctr
    Code.
    .............................................................................................................
    awsa the
    ssory
    ed ch d
    amended
    pub
    brbe other on

    Potrebbero piacerti anche