Sei sulla pagina 1di 16

Borama 2012

District Conflict and Security Assessment Report

Observatory of
Conflict and Violence
Prevention
Observatory of
Conflict and Violence
Prevention

Borama 2012
District Conflict and Security Assessment Report
Table of Contents

Overview................................................................. 2

Picture 1: Map of Somaliland


and Puntland illustrating the
location of Borama ............................................... 3
Acknowledgments
The Somali Observatory of Conflict and Violence 1. Introduction ........................................................ 4
Prevention (OCVP) would like to thank the
following: 2. Methodology....................................................... 4
2.1 Questionnaires ......................................... 4
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) 2.2 Focus Group Discussions.......................... 5
in Somalia, in particular, the Community Security
2.3 Key Informant Interviews........................ 5
project within the Governance and Rule of Law
Programme, for providing financial support
during this survey exercise. 3. Perceived Performance of Security,
Justice, and Governance Actors ..................... 5
3.1 Security Provider ..................................... 5
Authors 3.2 Justice Provider ........................................ 7
Abdirahman Sheikh Hassan, Lead Researcher (OCVP) 3.3 Governance Provider............................... 8
Abdullahi Mohamed Odowa, Senior Social Researcher
(General Director, OCVP)
4. Forms of Insecurity and Violence....................10
Ilyas Ibrahim Mohamed, Data Analyst (OCVP)
Nienke Hiemstra, Researcher (OCVP)
4.1 Conflict and Violence..............................10

The Observatory of Conflict and Violence Prevention


All rights reserved. Publications of the Observatory of Conflict
and Violence Prevention can be obtained from Observatory
of Conflict and Violence Prevention (OCVP), Hargeisa,
Somaliland (email: info@ocvp.org).

Requests for permission to reproduce or translate OCVP


publications whether for sale or for noncommercial
distribution should be addressed to the OCVP, at the
above address.

1
Overview

Key findings from the focus group


discussions are as follows: Both land based disputes and disputes
as a consequence of the elections are
Focus group discussions were held with youth potential sources of clan-based conflicts.
(men and women in one group), women, elders Moreover, a female youth participant as well
and religious leaders, IDP camp residents, and as a religious leader mentioned that clan issues
business leaders. Youth participants, IDP camp had had a negative influence on the polling
residents, and elders and religious leaders process during the recent elections.
pointed out that youth violence is the most
serious safety concern in the district. Youth With regard to individuals and institutions
groups often clash with each other after best able to prevent and stop violence, youth,
football games. In addition, the youth focus women and business leaders mentioned the
group participants mentioned cases of group police as the most important institution. Other
rape committed by youth in the suburbs of the individuals that play a central role are the
town as a growing concern. traditional and religious leaders, according to
the women and business leaders. Contrary to the
The IDP camp residents also mentioned an participants from the other groups, the elders
increasing number of street children and human and religious leaders stated that the police is
rights violations by the police as growing security sometimes the cause of violence, and therefore
concerns. On the other hand, participants from the does not play an important role. Besides, young
women focus group said that the security in the police officers are often undisciplined and not
district is generally good, but expressed their well trained. The elders and religious leaders
concern about a lack of cooperation between considered themselves as best able to prevent
the community and the police. and stop violence in the district.
There were mixed opinions with regard to the Youth participants and women mentioned besides
extent that mobile phone muggings form a security security issues, unemployment as the most
threat. Participants of the youth group and IDP significant concern within the community. Another
group mentioned these muggings as a growing concern that was mentioned by youth, women and,
concern, whereas the business leaders said that it religious and traditional leaders is sanitation.
rarely happens. Business leaders, on the other hand, Especially slaughterhouses need urgent attention
stated that youth violence and violence/attacks according the elders and religious leaders. IDP had
committed by individuals are the largest safety other concerns on the other hand. They said that
concerns, but Borama is generally considered as a Borama is in need of more bill markets and at least
relatively safe district. two more police stations. Also, the construction of
roads is a serious concern according to the IDPs.
According to youth, women, business leaders and
IDP camp residents, land based disputes are a Overall, focus group participants were unsatisfied
common cause of conflict within the community. In with the performance of the local government. Youth
addition, participants from the womens and youth participants said that people refuse to pay taxes,
groups said that political violence during and after because they have no trust in the local government
the local council elections might result in conflict in anymore. Both IDPs and business leaders mentioned
the district. sanitation as the most important area for improvement
.

2
Borama

Picture 1: Map of Somaliland and Puntland illustrating the location of Borama

Key findings from the key informant (mayor, The key local elder mentioned, besides security
prosecutor, police commissioner, community issues, two serious concerns: employment gene-
elder and religious leader) interviews are as ration, especially for youth, and construction of
follows: a road that connectsBorama to other towns.
Furthermore, the regional prosecutor mentioned
According to both the key religious leader and youth violence, land-based disputes, violence/
police commissioner, no significant conflict had attacks by individuals and rape as the most
occurred in Borama over the last 12 months. common crimes. However, there has been a
However, the religious leader said that significant reduction in the number of reported
land-based disputes are a constant potential rape cases. Approximately three years ago,
source of community conflict. The police 25 cases were annuallyreceived by the
commissioner, on the other hand, said that the prosecutors office compared to 10 cases
land-based conflicts that occurred were insig- in the last two years.
nificant; youth violence is the most serious security
problem at the moment. The religious leader All key informants, except for the mayor, were
rated sound and incorruptible leadership rather unsatisfied with the performance of the
as the most significant concern in the community. local government. The mayor, on the other hand,
expressed his content with the development of the
The mayor's main concern is related to land new District Development Framework (DDF), which
disputes in Borama, often regarding community- will support the government to develop the
owned land. The recent case about the enclosure capacity to deliver services. Sanitation and
of an area calledCidhiidhiga is yet to be resolved hygiene were mentioned as the most important
by a security committee. areas for improvement by most key informants.

In addition, the mayor is satisfied with progress


made in the JPLG Programme.

3
1. Introduction 2. Methodology

Regular assessments of issues affecting This District Conflict and Security Assessment
community safety and security are critical Report for Borama district was prepared through
in providing evidence for effective progr- compilation of data and information gathered
amming, and to allow for continual through three research tools and methodologies:
monitoring and evaluation of safety and questionnaires, focus group discussions and key
security interventions. However, such evidence informant interviews.
based programming at a district level does
not currently exist in Somalia. Measuring the 2.1 Questionnaires
outcome and impact of interventions to deal The first tool used was questionnaires. The
with insecurity is important in order to advance questionnaire aims at providing the necessary
collective understanding of what works and quantitative information for outlining an accurate
what does not. The Somali Observatory of picture of the level of deployment, level of use and
Conflict and Violence Prevention (OCVP) is perception of security, justice and governance
an apolitical and neutral Somali organization, providers, and finally, conflict and violence. The
which collectively aims at building Somali questionnaires were administered to 80 households,
capacity to mitigate violence and insecurity approximately 80 people (58.8% were female and
in a sustainable manner. 80% was married) from 4 divisions of Borama,
namely Sh. Makaahiil, Sh. Axmed Salaan, Sh. Cali
The objective of the survey is to annually Jowhar, and Sh. Cismaan (including people from the
assess the performance of security, justice, IDP settlements at the outskirts of the latter two
and governance providers, and levels of divisions). Figures 1 and 2 show characteristics of
conflict and violence at the district level in the respondents.
Somalia, in order to assist in the development
of District Council Annual Work Plans.

The questionnaire was designed to gather


quantitative data, in combination with the
data from focus group discussions and key
informant interviews. The findings of this
analysis will be used in the preparation of the
annual development plan of Odweyne, as part
of provision of local governance across Somalia.

Targeting level of deployment, level of use and


perception by the community on justice, security
and governance providers, as well as community
perceptions on conflict and violence, the district
assessment will be divided into four key sections.
Following this introduction, methodologies used
will be described in section 2.

The remaining sections present the perceived


performance of security, justice, and
governance actors. Finally, the last section looks
at perceptions of conflict and violence.

4
3. Perceived Performance of
Security, Justice, and Governance
Actors

Both the questionnaires, focus group discussions


and key informant interviews inquired about the
performance of the various public authorities or
civil society actors able to respond to insecurity,
namely the police, the courts, local authorities,
religious leaders and community elders. The
following sub-sections will present a perspective
of the perceived performance of these different
actors, including by type of crime.

3.1 Security Provider


The vast majority (82.5%) of Borama respond-
ents said they perceive the police as trustworthy,
ranging from fairly high (51.5%) to very high
2.2 Focus Group Discussions
(48.5%). 15 per cent of the remaining respond-
The second tool used is focus groups to capture
ents answered they have a low trust in the police
perceptions about the nature of insecurities in
(Figure 3).
district subdivisions, and its victims and perpetrators.
The researchers from the Observatory of Conflict
and Violence Prevention convened the focus groups
in December, bringing together women, youth, elders
and religious leaders, business leaders, and IDPs of
the district. Participants were asked to compile a list
of all major types of violence experienced in Borama.
They were then led through a process of describing
the causes, locations, times, victims and perpetrators.
Finally, they were asked to identify the individuals or
institutions that they trusted to either prevent or
respond to violence.

2.3 Key Informant Interviews


Qualitative interviews were conducted by the
Moreover, there is no significant difference
researchers from the Observatory of Conflict and
between the level of trust afforded to the police
Violence Prevention. These interviews were carried
by male and female respondents. 85.1 per cent
out between 9-12th of December 2012, covering the
of female respondents as well as 78.8 per cent
district of Borama. Each interview lasted about half
of male respondents afforded high levels of trust
an hour, and five individuals, including key district
to the police.
elder, key religious leader, prosecutor, police
commissioner and mayor of Borama were
Out of 12 respondents who afforded low levels
interviewed separately.
of trust to the police, seven were residents of
Sh. Axmed Salaan.

5
Over half of respondents (51.3%) pointed out the
absence of police in their community. 69.3 of
respondents who acknowledged presence of police
added that there were at least three police officers. 46.3 per cent of respondents would contact the police
In addition, 53.8 per cent of respondents who in the event of a civil case 1, and 43.8 per cent would
acknowledged police existence also said their contact a court. There proved to be no significant
premises are situated at less than 10 minutes difference in preference between male and female
walking distance from where they live. respondents. Over half of male respondents (54.5%)
prefer to contact the police, while most female
66 per cent of respondents who pointed out respondents (42.6%) would contact a court. In
absence of police were female. Furthermore, addition, 40.4 per cent of the female respondents
57.6 per cent of male respondents said the police would contact the police (Figure 7).
operate in their communities (Figure 5).

Despite the fact that the majority of respondents


who afforded low levels of trust to the police were
Sh. Axmed Salaan residents, 90 per cent of them
confirmed presence of police in their community.
In addition, 55 per cent of Sh. Cismaan respondents
said that the police operate in their community. On
the other hand, 95 per cent of Sh. Makaahiil respo-
ndents as well as 55 per cent of Sh. Cali Jowhar
respondents said that there is no police presence in
their community (Figure 6). Notably, all Sh. Cismaan
respondents who said there is no police in their
community are IDPs.
With respect to petty crimes 2, the overwhelming
majority of respondents (93.8%) would contact the
police. The remaining four respondents who preferred
to contact another authority (including local authorities,
religious leaders and courts) were female (Figure 8).

1. Crimes include land dispute, and divorce


2. Crimes include robberies

6
A regional breakdown shows that 85 per cent of
Sh. Makaahiil respondents said they are very
confident in the formal justice system. Furthermore,
perceptions of respondents from other divisions
were fairly evenly divided between the options
(Figure 11).

In line with the preferred contact points for the crimes3


mentioned above, the vast majority of respondents
(90%) said they would contact the police for serious
crimes3. Furthermore, seven female respondents
would contact a court in case of a serious crime
(Figure 9).

Only 21.3 per cent of respondents said there are


no courts nearby. The vast majority of both male
respondents (84.8%) and female respondents
(74.5%) acknowledged the establishment of courts
in their community (Figure 12).

3.2 Justice Provider


3.2 Justice Provider
Over two-third of respondents (68.8%) said they were
fairly or very confident in the formal justice providers.
On the contrary, an equal number of female and male
respondents (nine each) said they are not confident in
the formal justice system. However, nearly half of all Over half of respondents (58.8%) who said that
female respondents (48.9%) said they are very courts do not exist in their community were residents
confident in the formal justice system (Figure 10). from Sh. Cismaan division of Borama. This is
50 per cent of all Sh. Cismaan respondents
(Figure 13).

68.3 per cent of respondents said they have to walk


less than 20 minutes to reach the court. There is no
significant difference between the different divisions
of Borama (Figure 14).

3. Crimes include rape and murder

7
Furthermore, only three respondents (from Sh.
Makaahiil, Sh. Cali Jowhar and Sh. Cismaan) had
used local elders to settle land/water disputes in
the last 12 months. All respondents were referred
by their family members, and they all received a
judgement that was enforced.

Moreover, only five respondents from Sh. Cali


Jowhar had sought assistance from religious leaders
in the last 12 months to settle land/water disputes,
household violence issues and assault cases. They
all received a judgement that was enforced.

3.3 Governance Provider


Over two-third (70%) of respondents said they
are not familiar with their representatives in the
Only seven respondents had heard about the legal local council (Figure 15).
aid clinic: three from Sh. Makaahiil, three from
Sh. Cali Jowhar and one from Sh. Cismaan. Referred
by their family members and police, three of these
respondents had used the legal aid providers in the
last 12 months for land/water disputes and assaults.
They consequently received judgements that were
enforced.

With respect to court usage, only nine respondents


(five from Sh. Cismaan, two from Sh. Makaahiil,
and one from each of the remaining divisions) had
used a court in the last 12 months for land/water
disputes, robberies, assaults and household violence
issues. Five of the cases were referred by a family
member and two by elders. A judgement was given
in seven of the cases, of which only one was not
enforced.
The responses do not significantly differ between
male and female respondents. Over three-fourth of
female respondents (76.6%) as well as 60.6 per cent
of male respondents said they are not familiar with
their representatives (Figure 16).

Nearly two-third of Sh. Makaahiil respondents (65%)


said they are familiar with their representatives,
constituing more than half (54.2%) of all positive
respondents (Figure 17).

8
Nearly one-fourth (18 respondents, of which
eleven were female) of respondents believe it is
not necessary to have an elected official to represent
them in the district council. 60 per cent of these
respondents were residents of Sh. Cismaan, forming
66.7 per cent of all respondents who held this opinion
(Figure 18).

On the other hand, only five (four female) respondents


had participated in local government consultations in
the last 12 months. Three of them were from Sh. Cali
Jowhar, one from Sh. Makaahiil and none of these
respondents were from Sh. Axmed Salaan. Four
people had participated at least twice in the local
consultations.

9
4. Forms of Insecurity and Violence

Participants in focus group discussions mentioned


different types of security concerns to the local
community that fuel conflict and social unrest in the
district of Borama. This includes youth violence,
muggings, rape, and land-based disputes. In
addition, youth unemployment, sanitation, hygiene,
and road construction were mentioned as concerns.

4.1 Conflict and Violence


Nearly one-fourth of respondents (23.8 per cent,
19 respondents) said they had witnessed conflict in
the last 12 months. Seven of these respondents were
from Sh. Axmed Salaan, five from Sh. Cismaan and
four from Sh. Cali Jowhar. The total number of
conflicts adds up to 41, and as a result of the
conflicts, five people were killed in Sh. Axmed
Salaan, four in Sheikh Makaahiil and three others
in Sh. Cali Jowhar. Conflicts were related to youth
violence, resources, and family disputes.

In addition, 23.8 per cent (19 respondents, of which


10 were male) of respondents had witnessed a crime
against someone outside their household in the last
12 months. 12 of these respondents were from
Sh. Cali Jowhar, and four were residents of Sh. Axmed
Salaan (Figure 19).

Despite the violent conflicts and crimes, only 15


per cent (12 respondents, including 8 female) said
they feel unsafe when walking alone in their areas
after dark (Figure 20).

Five of the respondents who said they feel unsafe


were residents from Sh. Cali Jowhar and four were
from Sh. Axmed Salaan. These are the two divisions
that had witnessed most crimes in the last 12 months,
as figure 19 shows.

10
District Conflict and
Security Assessment Report
Borama District 2012

www.ocvp.org

Potrebbero piacerti anche