Sei sulla pagina 1di 7

Principles of Effective Instruction - General Standards

for Teachers and Instructional Designers


Hennann Astleitner

This paper offers a review on effective instructional tnethods from educational and
psychological research. Thirteen instructional principles are presented which should
help teachers and educators to improve the quality of their instruction. Principles 1
to 4 concern general conditions of successful instruction. Principles 5 to 8 consist
of instructional methods to improve and optimize cognitive effects of learning.
Principles 9 to 11 refer to motivational and efnotional design. Principle 12 is deal-
ing with the handling of ethic aspects. Finally, principle 13 concerns the design of
instructional materials.
Many experts in the field of education of instruction (e.g., Baumert, Artelt, Klieme,
assume that people can only manage a cotn- Neubrand. Prenzel, Schiefele, Schneider,
plex personal and pt ofessional life when they Tillmann, & WeiB, 2003); and d) practical
are well educated. Such a credo builds the approaches which do not only consist of
core of actual quality assurance activities in traditional methods of instruction, but also
schools. These activities are based at the best reflect new developments which assist in
on a rnodel of good or effective instruction. facing global educational competition (e.g.,
The question of what makes instruction ef- Mayer, 1999; Paris & Paris, 2001).
fective has been in the focus of educational These results of research are summarized
and psychological research for decades. It is - within this paper - as "principles" of good
obvious and helpful for instructional practice instruction (e.g.. Sternberg. 1998). "Prin-
that research results are reviewed from time ciples" are general standards or guidelines for
to time. Such a review represents the goal acting which were created by generalizations
of this paper and will focus on: a) results of research results and which educational
of research which are repeatedly confirmed practitioners should keep in mind when they
and which meet criteria of social empirical want to design effective instructional methods
research (e.g.. Atkinson. Derry, Renkl. & and processes. Focusing on such principles
Wortham, 2000: Dubs, 1995; Haenisch. 2002; only increases the success of instruction
Helmke & Weinert. 1997; Slavin, 2000); b) when instructional methods are continuously
approaches which not only consider cogni- planned, implemented, evaluated, and adapt-
tive characteristics of students as relevant for ed based on these principles. To adapt means
learning, but also motivational and emotional that instructional methods are calibrated to
aspects (e.g.. Astleitner. 2005; Astleitner, given characteristics of students, teachers,
2000; Bergin, 1999); c) experiences which and subject matters. Such a calibration can-
allow toestablishanation-widequality assur- not be delivered by this paper, because it is
ance system for itnproving the effectiveness assu med that the connection between research
and practice can only be realized at a general
Hennann Astleitner, Professor of Educational level. However, when integrating these prin-
Psychology. University of Salzburg. Salzburg. ciples during planning, impletnenting, and
Austria.
evaluating instructional tnethods - together
Correspondence concerning this article
should be addressed to Dr. Hennann Astleitner, with a diagnosis of problems conceming
Associate Professor, Departtnent of Education and students and subject matters -. then it can
Sociology. University of Salzburg, Akademies- be expected that general guidelines have a
trasse 26, A-5020 Salzburg. Austria. specific influence on the design of fine-graded
41 Journal of Instructional Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 1

instructional methods. Furthermore, it is teaching goals are stated, pre-knowledge is


important to mention that not all principles activated, stimulating contents are presented,
have to be implemented in order to produce learning processes are guided, feedback on
effective instruction. However, it should be tasks is given, learning progress is evalu-
the aim of instructional designers to reflect ated, and knowledge transfer is guaranteed.
these principles periodically as general InstiTJCtion motivates students if attention
instructional standards when planning and is aroused, the relevance of the contents is
evaluating instructional activities. These shown, the self-confidence is strengthened,
principles are: and satisfaction with the results of learning
is achieved. In respect to emotion, instruction
Principle 1: Instructing based on a design should decrease negative feelings (above all
for reflexive learning fear, envy, and anger) and increase positive
During instruction, the student should get feelings (above all sympathy and pleasure).
the possibility to reflect on learning. Reflec- Multiple support means that the methods
tive learning represents an active process of for influencing cognitive, motivational, and
construction in which memory contents are emotional processes should be applied in a
- mediated by thinking processes - changed, way that these methods are complementary
expanded, linked, structured, or created. This to each other and do not disturb the effects
goal can be achieved by basic characteristics of the other methods.
of good instruction: a) taking preventive steps
to implement instructional methods without Principle 3: Considering the strengths of
disturbances and to handle successfully students
critical events (e.g., emotional conflicts of Instruction and achievement evaluation
students); b) realizing a suitable, not maximal are especially effective, when they assist the
pace of instruction and a sequence of instruc- student in finding and increasing personal
tion which allows students and teachers to strengths and, in addition, when they deliver
have enough time for thinking and asking guidance to overcome personal weaknesses.
questions; c) presenting contents and tasks Students are more successful in learning when
organized and clearly; d) varj'ing instructional they are instructed in a way that their individ-
methods during different phases of instruc- ual strengths are supported. Here, preferences
tion; e) focusing instruction consequently have to be considered for the kind of learning
on teaching goals and offering plenty of (i.e.. self-regulated or teacher-regulated), for
possibilities forexercising;f)considering in- instructional materials(i.e.,textsor lectures),
dividual differences and learning progresses; or for achievement evaluations (i.e., oral or
and g) establishing a good social-emotional written examinations). In addition, instruc-
climate between students and teachers. tion and achievement evaluation should be
based on individual- and criteria-referenced
Principle 2: Multiple supporting of cogni- standards and not on socially-referenced
tive, motivational, and emotional charac- standards (e.g.. "You have improved since
teristics last week" or "You have achieved 80 percent
Good instruction consists of a joint usage of all teaching goals" and not "40 percent of
of several instructional methods with different the students had better achievements than
effects on single characteristics of students. you!"). Achievement evaluations should
Good instruction not only supports students not only indicate whether a standard was
in thinking and learning, but also motivates reached or not, but also contain detailed and
them and offers an emotionally sound con- constructive information about how the given
text. Instruction produces cognitive effects if achievement could be improved.
Quality of I n s t r u c t i o n , . 1 5

Principle 4: Knowledge acquiring and ap- should be an integrated part of the achieve-
plying in varying contexts ment evaluation. Especially, many different
Daily instruction in school focuses traditional and new ways of achievement
within a first step on the acquisition of basic evaluation (e,g,, tests, observations, or
knowledge. It contains declarative (e.g., portfolios) should be used in order to get a
concepts, facts) and procedural (e,g,. rules) comprehensive and multi-faceted view ofthe
knowledge which should be presented and students' knowledge, thinking, and problem
become a part of the student's memory in solving behavior.
correct, structured, and inter-linked patterns.
In order to be able to use this knowledge base Principle 6: Stimulating argumentation
flexibly, it is necessary that it is applied and skills
evaluated repeatedly within practical cases. Argumentation skills or critical thinking
Such cases should vary in their difficulty skills concern general techniques which can
(number of elements to be used for problem be applied in many different subject areas
solving), in their correspondence with a and which represent an important capabil-
real task (reality), and in the availability of ity to handle obsolete, lacking, or wrong
guidance (learning support). Letting students information. For successful argumentation,
explain their knowledge to other students it is necessary to identify, to construct, and
also represents an effective way of varying to evaluate arguments. Instructional methods
contexts. supporting argumentation are: group activi-
ties with ranking procedures (of ideas, etc.),
Principle 5: Supporting and evaluating basic pro-and-cons-listings (e.g., advantages and
knowledge but also higher-order skills disadvantages), knowledge-wishes-learn-
In respect to research results, instruction questions (e,g,, what knowledge is avail-
should not only support the acquisition of able? what knowledge is desired? what was
basic knowledge, but also stimulate higher- learned?), summing up (e,g,, the core argu-
order thinking which guides problem solving. ment of a text), worksheets for stimulating
During instruction, basic knowledge should thinking (e,g,, writing a thinking protocol),
be presented with illustrative examples debates (e,g,, discussions of controversial
together with tasks and their solutions. issues), g) problem-based learning (e,g,, com-
Analytical thinking processes are stimulated parison of single cases), or graphic organizer
when students are asked to divide elements (e,g., using mapping techniques).
of knowledge, to compare, to evaluate, and
to explain them. Creative thinking can be fos- Principle 7: Realizing and guiding self-regu-
tered when students are required to imagine lated learning
elements of knowledge and to develop own In general, research found that system-
products of learning. Analytical and creative atically designed instruction by teachers was
thinking should be trained within problem often able to positively influence the achieve-
solving stages which consist of: finding a ments of students, what does not mean that
problem (what is the problem here?), defining students cannot acquire knowledge by self-
a problem (what are the components of the regulated learning activities. Self-regulated
problem?), formulating a problem solving learning means that the students control the
strategy (how can the problem be solved?), learning process in relation to given goals and
allocating resources (what is needed for that the student select activities to improve
solving the problem?), and evaluating the learning outcomes. However, for successful
solution (was problem solving successful?). self-regulated learning, students must dispose
Knowledge, thinking, and problem solving of general and specific learning strategies.
6/ Journal of Instructional Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 1

Such strategies concern and must be taught students. For teaching contents, it should be
within different subject matters: reading skills illustrated why they are important (relevant)
(e.g., taking notes), studying skills (e.g., forthe goalsand the lifeof students. Showing
memorizing), collaborative learning (e.g., students what kind of knowledge they do not
conflict resolution), project management dispose of and how this knowledge can be
(e.g., organizing projects), communication acquired also represents a major source for
skills (e.g., presenting results to others), increasing interest. Finally, interest can be
preparing and taking tests (e.g., anticipat- aroused when integrating idols, activating
ing test content), or preparing to learn (e.g., worksheets, learning games, or story telling
managing time). into instruction.

Principle S: Increasing the efficiency of Principle 10: Increasing positive feelings


learning Sympathy and pleasure represent posi-
When knowledge, thinking skills, and tive feelings of students. Sympathy among
learning strategies are acquired, then they students can be increased with instructional
can be optimized what concerns questions of strategies like: intensify relationships (e.g.,
the efficiency of learning. The efficiency of get students to know other students, friends,
learning is defined as the invested resources and families), install sensitive interactions
in relation to the result of learning. Learning (e.g.. reduce students' sulking and increase
with high efficiency occurs when students are their directly asking for help), establish
working with tasks which challenge, but not cooperative learning structures (e.g., use
overcharge them. Such tasks are related to the group investigations for cooperation), and
pre-knowledge. but also request additional implement peer helping programs (e.g., let
knowledge or skills. Also, learning becomes students "adopt" children in need). Pleasure
more efficient when learning and thinking can be increased by enhancing well-being
processes are highly automatic. Therefore, (e.g., illustrate students a probabilistic view
students should get the possibility, for ex- ofthe future), establishing open learning op-
ample, in competitions with others, not only portunities (e.g., use self-instructional learn-
to find a correct solution to a problem, but ing materials), using humor (e.g., produce
also to identify a quick solution which does funny comics with students), or installing
not require much resources in time. play-like activities (e.g., use simulation-based
instructional games).
Principle 9: Arousing and sustaining inter-
est Principle 11: Decreasing negative feelings
Interest as motivation which is directed Fear, envy, and anger are negative feel-
to a certain subject matter, can be stimulated ings which often occur during instruction.
by different instructional methods. Students There are several instructional strategies
find interest when they think that they are an to reduce these feelings: ensure success in
important part of a development or a group. learning (e.g., use well-proven motivational
Both, the development and the group should and cognitive instructional strategies), accept
be linked to values ("We do good things!"), mistakes as opportunities for learning (e.g.,
be presented in public, and offer support for let student talk about their failures, their
individuals. Interest can also be increased expectations, the reasons for errors), induce
when students experience competence (based relaxation (e.g., apply muscle relaxation,
on success) in a subject area, when they are visual imagery, autogenics, or meditation),
able to set own goals, and when they can work be critical, but sustain a positive perspec-
protected from social comparisons with other tive (e.g., train students in critical thinking.
Quality of Instruction ..17

but also point out the beauty of things) for Principle 13: Using self-instructional learn-
reducing fear; encourage comparison with ing materials
autobiographical and criterion reference Many of the presented principles can
points instead of social standards (e.g.. show more easily be integrated in daily instmc-
students their individual learning history), tion, when learning materials are designed
install consistent and transparent evaluating in a way that they stimulate self-regulated
and grading (e.g., inform students in detail learning. In order that self-regulated learn-
about guidelines for grading), inspire a sense ing can take place, learning materials must
of authenticity and openness (e.g.. install be self-instructional. Such materials show
"personal information boards" telling others these characteristics: a reason why the ma-
who you are), and avoid unequal distributed terial should be learned, a statement what
privileges among students (e.g., grant all pre-knowledge is necessary to understand
students or no student access to private mat- the material and how this knowledge can be
ters) for decreasing envy among students; acquired, a consequent orientation on teach-
and stimulate the control of anger (e.g., ings goals, a clear structure of the content,
show students how to reduce anger through tasks which allow students to test their knowl-
counting backward), show multiple views of edge, learning guidance by questions and
things (e.g., demonstrate how one problem marginalia, pre- and post-organizers, a pool
can be solved through different operations), of tasks varying in difficulty together with
let anger be expressed in a constructive way (complete, incomplete, or multiple) solutions
(e.g., do not accept escaping when interper- and solution paths, also text attributes which
sonal problem solving is necessary), and do support the search, the organization, and the
not show and accept any form of violence integration of knowledge, and figures which
(e.g., avoid threatening gestures). help to understand the material better.

Principle 12: Establishing respect and re- References


sponsibility Astleitner. H. (2000). Designing emotion-
Changes in society require the school to ally sound instruction. The FEASP-approach.
overtake the teaching of general life skills. Instructional Science, 28. 169-198.
Astleitner, H. (Ed.). (2005). School develop-
Such general life skills are - above all - focus-
ment. Frankfurt/M.: Lang.
ing on respect and responsibility concerning
Atkinson. R. K., Derry, S. J.. Renkl, A., &
other people, the environment, the society in Wonham, D. (2000). Learning from examples:
general, etc. During instruction, such values Instructional principles from the worked examples
and related attitudes can be obtained if several research. Review of Educational Research, 70,
conditions are established: building a commu- 181-214.
nity with members who take care about each Baumert.J.,Aitelt,C..Klieme,E..Neubrand,
other, using democratic rules when decisions M., Prenzel, M., Schiefele, U., Schneider, W.,
have to be made, making ethical reflexions Tilhnann, K.-J., & WeiB, M. (Hrsg.). (2003). Pisa
(what is allowed?), answering questions con- 2000 - Ein differenzierter Bliek atifdie Uinder der
BimdesrepttbUk Deutschland. Opiaden: Leske +
cerning individual personality development
Budrich.
and finding sense of living, discussing ways Bergin, D. A. (1999). Influences on classroom
of how to design daily living, or integrating interest. Educational Psychologist, 34, 87-98.
controversial issues (e.g., genetics or nuclear Dubs, R. (1995). Lehrerverhalten. Zurich:
power) in subject matters. Verlag des Schweizerischen Kaufmannischen
Verbandes.
8/ Journal of Instructional Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 1

Haeni.sch,H.(2002).WieimUnten-ichtnach- Slavin. R. E. (2000). A model of effective


haltigergelerntwerdenkann [WWWdocument]. instruction [WWWdocument]. URLhttp./lwww.
IJRL Imp//.-www.c/is.at [Access 28.04.2004] successforall.net/resource/research/modeleffect.
Helmke, A., & Weinert, F. E. (1997). Bc- torn [Access 20.10.2000]
dingungsfaktoren schulischer Leistungen. In F. Sternberg. R. J. (1998). Principles of teaching
Weinert (Hrsg.), Psychologic des Unterrichts und forsuccessful intelligence. Educational Psycholo-
der Schule (S. 71-176). Gottingen: Hogrefe. gist, 33, 65-72.
Mayer, R. E. (1999). Designing instruction Weinert, F. E., & Helmke, A. (Hrsg.). (1997).
for constructivist learning. In C. M. Reigeluth Entwicklung im Grundsclmlalter, Weinheim:
(Ed.). Instructional-design theories and models Psychologie Verlags Union.
(pp. 141-159). Mahvvah. NJ: Erlbaum.
Paris, S.G.,&Paris,A.H. (2001). Classroom
applications ofresearch on selfregulated learning.
Educational Psychologist, 36, 89-101.

Potrebbero piacerti anche