Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Oral Research
ISSN 0719-2460 | ISSNe 0719-2479
www.joralres.com
CASO CLNICO / CASE REPORT
Enrique Fer nndez- Apicectoma o implante: Reporte de un caso clnico.
B o d e r e a u 1 , Pa t r i c i a
Apicetomy or dental implant: Report of a clinical case.
Tortolini1
Resumen: Se reporta un caso clnico de un paciente al que se le realiz apicectoma
en un premolar superior, presumiblemente por una endodoncia realizada en forma
inadecuada y tener un perno colado donde la extraccin del mismo correra el riesgo
1.- Facultad de Odontologa, de la fractura dentaria. Fracasado dicho tratamiento se realiza un implante inmediato
Universidad Nacional de Crdoba. a la exodoncia, donde se coloc relleno seo autlogo y xenoinjerto con membrana
Argentina.. de colgeno reabsorbible. De esto se deduce que la faz diagnstica es muy importante.
Despus de 4 meses se realiza la carga funcional del implante con una corona cermica
cementada. Uno de los factores que influyeron en los resultados positivos de este caso,
es la superficie ultramicrotexturada del implante que se us, adems de ser considerados
estadsticamente los premolares de tener la tabla sea vestibular de mayor espesor que
el sector anterior.
Palabras claves: Regeneracin sea guiada, biomateriales, implantes, apicectoma.
Contacto: Dr. Enrique Fernndez-
Bodereau. Av. Haya de la Torre s/n, Fernndez-Bodereau E & Tortolini P. Apicectoma o implante: Reporte de un caso
Ciudad Universitaria, Crdoba, clnico. J Oral Res 2012; 1(1): 27- 34.
Argentina. Fono: 054-351-4333079.
Email: bodereau@uolsinectis.com.ar Recibido: 02/05/12 | Aceptado: 14/06/12 | Online: 22/07/12
27
Fernndez-Bodereau & Tortolini. Apicectoma o implante: Reporte de un caso clnico.
2 3 4
Figura 1, Presentacin del caso clnico en la primera consulta. Figura 2, Radiografa Pre-Operatoria del caso clnico.
Figuras 3 y 4, Realizacin de la apicectoma (Gentileza del Dr. Arano-Madrid).
28
Fernndez-Bodereau & Tortolini. Apicectoma o implante: Reporte de un caso clnico.
5 6 Figura 5, Extraccin
atraumtica del 15 con
periotn ultrafino.
Figura 6, Vista del lecho,
donde se mantuvo intacto el
tejido seo circundante.
Figura 7, Material de relleno
y sutura.
Figura 8, Cicatrizacin del
tejido a los dos meses.
Figura 9, Restauracion final
(vista oclusal).
Figura 10, Control a los dos
7 8 aos.
Figura 11, Radiografa final.
9 10 11
29
Fernndez-Bodereau & Tortolini. Apicectoma o implante: Reporte de un caso clnico.
30
Fernndez-Bodereau & Tortolini. Apicectoma o implante: Reporte de un caso clnico.
31
Fernndez-Bodereau & Tortolini. Apicectoma o implante: Reporte de un caso clnico.
Abstract: We report a clinical case of a patient who underwent apicectomy on an upper premolar, presumably by endodontic
done improperly, and have cast a bolt where the extraction run the risk of tooth fracture. Failed such treatment, an implant
is performed, placed immediately after extraction, in which bone filling with xenograft and guided bone regeneration with
resorbable collagen membrane was done. From this we deduce that the phase diagnosed is of paramount importance. Two
months after functional load of the implant is made with a cemented ceramic crown. One of the factors that influenced
the positive outcome of this case, where immediately implants are placed to the tooth extraction is ultra microtextured
surface of the used implant, besides being the bone table of these dental elements of thicker vestibular.
Keywords:guided bone regeneration, biomaterials, implants, apicectomy.
32
Fernndez-Bodereau & Tortolini. Apicectoma o implante: Reporte de un caso clnico.
Referencias. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000; 2(2): 21.- Gottlow J, Nyman S, Lindhe J, Karring
1.- Gmez de Ferraris ME, Campos Muoz 93-99. T, Wennstron J. New attachment formation
A. Periodoncio de insercin: Cemento, 11.- Testori T, Bianchi F, Del Fabbro M, in the human periodontium 26 Gottlow by
Ligamento Periodontal, y Hueso Alveolar. Caelli M, Zuffetti F, Berluchi I, Taschieri guided tissue regeneration. J Clin Period-
En Histologa y Embriologa Bucodental. S, Francetti L, Weinstein RL. Implant aes- ontol 1986; 13: 604-616.
Ed Medica Panamericana. Madrid 2002. thetic score for evaluating the outcome: 22.- Sculean A, Nikolidakis D, Schwarz F.
2.- Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Coulthard immediate loading in the aesthetic zone. Regeneration of periodontal tis-
P, Worthington HV. The efficacy of various Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2005; 17(2): sues:combination and preclinical evidence.
bone augmentation procedures for dental 123-130. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35(suppl 8): 106-
implants: a Cochrane systematic review of 12.- Wagenberg B, Froum SJ. A retrospec- 116.
randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J tive study of 1925 consecutively placed 23.- Tinti, C. & Parma Benefati S. Vertical
Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21; 696- immediate implants from 1988 to 2004. ridge augmentation: surgical protocol and
710. Int J Oral MaxillofacImplants 2006; 21(1): retrospective evaluation of 48 consecutively
3.- Donos N, Mardas N, Chadha V. Clinical 71-80. inserted implants. Int J Periodont Restor
qutcomes of implants following lateral 13.- Zeren KJ. Minimally invasive extraction Dent 1998; 18: 435-443.
bone augmentation: systematic assessment and immediate implant placement: the 24.- Buser D, Dula, K, Hirt H, Schenk R.
of available options (barrier membranes, preservation of esthetics. Int J Periodont Lateral ridge augmentation using autografts
bone grafts, split osteotomy). J Clin Perio- Restor Dent 2006; 26(2): 171-181. and barrier membranes. A clinical study in
dontol 2008; 35 (suppl 8): 173-202. 14.- Covani U, Barone A, Cornelini R, 40 partially edentulous patients. J Oral
4.- Jensen SS, Terheyden H. Bone augmen- Crespi R. Soft tisue healing around implants Maxillofac Surg 1996; 54: 420-432.
tation procedures in localized defects in placed immediately after tooth extraction 25.- Jung R, Lecloux G, Rompen E , Ramel
the alveolar ridge: clinical results with dif- without incisin: a clinical report. Int J Oral C, Buser D, Hammerle CH.A feasibility
erent bone grafts and bone sustitute mate- Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19(4): 549-553. study evaluating an in situ formed synthetic
rials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 15.- Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. biodegradable membrane for guided bone
24: 218-236. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate regeneration in dogs. Clin Oral Implants
5.- Gomez-Carillo V, Giner Diaz J, Manie- implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Res 2009; 20(2): 151-161.
gas Lozano L, Gaite Ballesta JJ, Castro Periodontol 2004; 31(10): 820-828. 26.- Palti A, Hoch T. A concept for the
Bustamante A, Ruiz Cruz J, Montesdeoca 16.- Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom treatment of varius dental bone defects.
Garcia N. Apicectomia quirurgica: prop- JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following Implant Dent 2002; 11: 73-78.
uesta de un protocolo basado en la eviden- implant placement in fresh extraction sock- 27.- Baumgartner JC, Falkler WA. Bacteria
cia. Rev Esp Cir Oral Maxilofac 2011; 33(2): ets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin in the apical 5 mm of infected root canals.
61-66. Periodontol 2005; 32(6): 645-652. J Endod 1991; 17: 380-383.
6.- Gay-Escoda C, Penarrocha M, Berini 17.- Bodereau EF, De Leonardi G. Ausencia 28.- Wayman BE, Murata SM, Almeida RJ,
L. Lesions Periapicales. En: Gay Escoda de un nico elemento natural no setor Fowler CB. A bacteriological and histolog-
C, Berini Aytes L. Cirugia Bucal. Madrid: anterior, com reborde osseo suficiente. ical evaluation of 58 periapical lesions. J
Ergon, 1999; pp.749-80 Face cirurgica.. In.Todescan FF, Bechelli Endod 1992; 18: 152-155.
7.- Kantor ML. Dental digital radiography: A, Romanelli H, editors. Implantodontia 29.- Souza RA. The importance of apical
more tan a fad, less tan a revolution. J Am contemporanea. Sao Pablo; Artes Medicas, patency and cleaning of the apical foramen
Dent Assoc. 2005; 136: 1358-1360. 2005. pp. 67-102. on root canal preparation. Braz Dent J
8.- Buitrago Vera, PJ, Sicilia Felechosa, A, 18.- Skalak R. A brief essay on the on the 2006; 17: 6-9.
Enrile de Rojas FJ, Tejerina Lobo JM, philosophy of a one-step versus a two- 30.- Nevins, M, Nevins ML, Camelo M,
Fuertes Gutierrez L. Como mejorar la step procedure for oseointegrated fixture- Boyesen DM Kim. Human histologic evi-
precisin en la colocacin de implantes. El supported dentalprotheses. In : Branemark dence of a connective tissue attachment to
uso de la gua quirrgica de contorno. ROE PL editor The Branemark Novum Protocol a dental implant. Int J Periodont Restor
1996; 56(4): 11-20. for Same Day Teeth a global perspective Dent 2008; 28(2): 111-121.
9.- Vanden Bogaerde L, Rangert B, Wen- - Chicago: Quintessence Books, 2001. 31.- Pecora GE, Ceccarelli R, Bonelli M,
delhag I. Immediately function of Brane- pp.16-20. Alexander H, Ricci JL. Clinical Evaluation
mark System TiUnite implants in fresh 19.- Gottlow J, Nyman S, Karring T, Lindhe of Laser microtexturing for soft tissue and
extraction sockets in maxillae and posterior J. New attachment formation as the result bone attachment to dental implants. Implant
mandibles:an 18-month prospective clinical of controlled tissue regeneration. J Clin Dent 2009; 18(1): 57-66.
study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; Periodontol 1984; 11: 494-503. 32.- Novaes AB Jr, Papalexiou V, Grisi
7: S121-130. 20.- Buser D, Duka K, Hirt HP, Berthold MFM, Souza SSLS, Tabba M Jr, Kajiwara
10.- Polizzi G, Grunder U, Goene R, Henry H. Localized ridge augmentation using JK. Influence of implant microstructure
P, Jackson WJ, Kawamura K, Renouard F, guided bone regeneration. In Buser D, on the osseointegrationof immediate im-
Rosenberg R, Tripplett G, Werbitt M, Lith- Dahlin C, Schenk RK,eds. Guided Bone plants placed into periodontally infected
ner B. Immediate and delayed implant place- regeneration in implant dentistry. Berlin. sites. A histomorphometric study in dogs.
ment into extraction sockets: a 5-year report. Q u i n t e s s e n c e, 1 9 9 4 ; p p 1 8 9 - 2 2 3 . Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 34-43.
33
Fernndez-Bodereau & Tortolini. Apicectoma o implante: Reporte de un caso clnico.
33.- Myiamoto J, Obama T. Dental Cone bone regeneration in mandibular defects material: a case report. Int J Periodont
Beam Computed Tomography Analyses of in rats, using a biorebsorbable polymer. Restor Dent 2002; 22:567-72
Postoperative Labial Bone Thickness in Clinl Oral Impl Res 1994; 5: 66-74. 42.- Araujo M, Lindhe J. La influencia del
Maxilary Anterior Implants: Comparing 38.- Araujo M, Wennstron J, Lindhe J. colgeno Bio-Oss en la cicatrizacin del
Inmediate and Delayed Implant Placement. Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone- alveolo post-extraccion: estudio experimen-
Int J Periodontol Rest Den 2011; 31(3): walls of fresh extraction sites following tal en perros. Rev Int Odontol Restaur
215-225. implant installation. Clin Oral Impl Res Period 2008; 12: 131-143.
34.- Chen ST, Buser D. Clinical and esthetic 2006; 17: 606-614. 43.- Araujo M, Lindhe J. Ridge preservation
with the use of Bio-oss collagen: a 6 month
outcomes of implants placed in postextrac- 39.- Block M, Degen M. Horizontal ridge
study in dog. Clin Oral Impl Res 2009; 20:
cion sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants augmentation using Human mineralized
433-440.
2009; 24: 186-217. particulate bone: preliminary results. J Oral
44.- Schenk RK, Buser D, Hardwick WR.
35.- Dahlin C, Linde A, Gottlow J, Nyman Maxillofacial Surg 2004; 62: 67-72.
Healing pattern of bone regeneration in
S. Healingof bone defects by guided tissue 40.- Araujo M, Sonohara M, Hayacibara R.
membrane protected defects. A histologic
regeneration. Plast Reconstruct Surg 1988; Lateral ridge augmentation by the use of study in canine mandible. Int J of Oral and
81: 672-676. grafos comprised of autologous bone or Maxillofacial Implants 1994; 9: 13-29.
36.- Dahlin C, Sennerby L, Lekholm U. a biomaterial. An experiment in the dog. J 45. Buser D. Horizontal ridge augmentation
Generation of new bone around titanium Clin Periodontol 2002; 29: 1122-1125. using autogenous block grafts and the
implant using a membrane technique, an 41.- Proussaefs P, Lozada J, Rohrer MD. guided bone regeneration technique with
experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral A clinical and histologic evaluation of a collagen membranes: a clinical study with
Maxillofacial Implants 1989; 4: 19-25. block onlay graft in conjunction with au- 42 patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;
37.- Kostopoulus L, Karring T. Guided togenous particulate and inorganic bovine 17(4): 359-366.
34