Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Introduction
m
The following report presents the analysis of human resource management (HRM)
issues provided in the case study on Marks and Spencers (M&S) organizational
co
change. Discusses strategic HRM issues facing the company in deciding to create
business units and adopt structural change, and the extent to which M&S needs to
.
overhaul HRM and its core business. The author also emphasizes the importance of
ay
HRM styles and approaches for the companys medium term business practices, being
integrated into an overall organizational strategy.
ss
2.0 Strategic HRM Issues for M&Ss Organizational Change
eE
only be successful if they focus on structural as reverse to cultural change. The case
with M&S is a scenario of rapid organisational transformation, which was based on a
Va
vision imposed on the company in a mainly directive fashion, down from the top, by its
management and CEO, but which could potentially lead to a widespread change of
attitudes and behaviours in the company. This change in the middle of the trading
period was a risky action and would bring a big confusion for the staff, putting a high
pressure on their performance. It was an emergent change where staff had to develop
and adjust to new ways of a flatter organisational structure and new ways of operations
under new business units.
HRM in M&S
In the case of M&S, it can be seen that the company deliberately set out to change the
basis on which it competed by reinventing itself as a service-based organisation. One of
the standard perceptions for successful organizations is that they should know their own
strengths and weaknesses, their customers needs and the nature of the environment in
which they operate. Hence, by introducing new business units M&S aimed to create
them fully profit-accountable, putting more emphasis on the individual performance of
the departments. This would enable M&S to effectively control their operations and
m
show where the improvements need to be implemented. Hence, by this new approach
to business practices, the company had to closely consider strategic issues of HRM.
co
One of the reasons behind the proposed change is to modify the attitudes and
.
behaviours of the staff. People are being required to reconsider their attitudes towards
ay
how work is performed and their attitudes to their counterparts externally. Whatever
form it takes, if it is to be successful, there are three people-related activities that need
to be undertaken: creating willingness to change; involving people, and sustaining the
ss
momentum (Doorewaard and Benschop, 2003; Burnes, 2004). M&S in seeking to
create willingness and a readiness for change need to be aware that stressing the
eE
positive aspects of the proposed change may have much a negative impact on the
companys performance. Therefore, M&S have to make people fully aware of the
pressure for such change during the trading period, giving them an on-going feedback
on the performance and areas of activity within the organisation, and understanding
lu
staffs fears and concerns. A constant communication and involvement will have to be
present, providing resources and explanations for change. Aligned line managers will
Va
have to give all support needed to the change agents, develop new competence and
skills and reinforce desired behaviours, such as increased pay or bonus.
The new changes to business units and flatter company structure are likely to increase
employee empowerment and responsibility, increasing more of the direct contacts with
customers and building new knowledge. Post-Modern theories suggest better flexible
strategies, accommodating change in the structure of power relationships, where they
HRM in M&S
specialise in their field of tasks (Johnson and Scholes, 2002; Francis, 2003), To become
more flexible M&S decided to apply a more horizontal management organization style.
Through a clear leadership role of appointed heads of business units, centralisation will
also be high only to a certain degree, not to prevent adaptability and flexibility of staff.
Coordination will need to be in a form of a clear structured hierarchy and division of
labour. To encourage job enrichment and staff satisfaction, M&S may establish one or
more specific coordinating roles. Liaisons, individual or departmental, committees, task
m
forces, project groups, and the like are all examples of possible structural coordinating
devices.
co
Many modern theorists believe that in order to succeed business culture needs to be
.
change-oriented and, hence, M&S need to adapt to differentiating changing
ay
environments and internal workforce diversity.
ss
3.0 HRM Approaches for M&Ss Medium Term Performance
an approach that acknowledges the importance of HRM to the aims of the business,
whilst reflecting attempts by management to create a work environment that
Va
Hard HRM is, as Liao (2005) has noted, closely aligned with what is often termed
strategic HRM. In these instances, HRM is closely linked with business strategy.
Accordingly, it views employees as resource to be used dispassionately and in a
HRM in M&S
formally rational manner. As such, HRM effectiveness can be more contingent upon
cost minimisation measures rather than upon significant investment in human
resources. A hard, contingency-based approach to HRM is often seen as an essential
part of a cost-minimisation strategy. However, in the case of M&S it is suggested that
for a successful implementation of changes, there is a more need of soft approach
for the medium term success, as everyone within the company needs to cooperate and
understand the importance of the changes.
m
co
For M&S the commitment of senior management and the assigned heads of the
business units to HRM are crucial to companys effective operation. It would be
essential to possess the knowledge and skills necessary to implement a credible HRM
.
programme within the organisation. For a medium term success, M&S needs to
consider the following HRM approaches: ay
ss
A clear understanding and commitment of the management to the desirable change
need to prevent any conflicts and operational barriers;
eE
Good dynamic and effective leadership will have to take place and be supported by the
managers of M&S;
communication, so that people can use the advantage of a good working team for the
progress and the companys success. Mayos motivation theory also suggests that
effective communication is an essential part of organisational changes and an effective
foundation of modern organisations. Hence, M&S has to put greater emphasis on
improvement of interpersonal communication skills of all organisational members;
HRM in M&S
m
its survival, growth and development;
co
It may be important to clarify the strategy throughout the hierarchy to every employee
(Huang, 2001). An effective two-way flow of information and communication has to take
place, so that everyone will be aware about the goals and visions of the companys
.
growth. Face-to-face, one-to-one communication through to routine bulletins on notice
ay
boards and circulars sent around the organization might take place for effective
communication of the message. Staff meetings have to take place to inform everyone
about the changes and prevent misunderstanding and dissatisfaction. In order to get a
ss
feedback on the changes, two-way communication approach has to be encouraged;
A good strategy for dealing with conflicts and contingency system is also essential form
eE
One of the challenges for managers having to introduce change in the company is to
Va
determine the strategy that will produce the best results. In a situation of excellence, a
company has to be able not only to adapt in an outstanding way to its market
conditions, but also to develop internal practices that clearly set it aside from the
competition.
Change can be costly, not only in financial terms, but in terms of management time. The
question should arise whether M&S has enough capabilities and is ready to manage
change and, more importantly, readiness to achieve the scope of change.
HRM in M&S
m
co
Strategic capability is essentially concerned with how the resources (including people)
are deployed, managed, controlled and, in the case of people, motivated to create
competences in those activities and business processes needed to run the business
.
(Huang, 2001). Bergenhenegouwen (1996) states that the concept of core competences
ay
goes beyond this in a search for those few activities that underpin competitive
advantage. Nevertheless, the starting point of successful strategies for M&S is
ss
acquiring, retaining and developing human resources. Much of the hard side of HRM
is concerned with ensuring that this baseline is maintained in the company. Such HRM
activities as audits to assess HR requirements to support core business strategies,
eE
goal-setting and performance assessment of individuals and teams, the use of rewards,
recruitment as a key to improve strategic capability, and training would assist M&S
management in delivering about the proposed change in the most effective way for
lu
business outcomes.
M&S has been always renown for the strength of linking business and human resource
Va
strategies. This tends to bring clarity from the business planning process. However,
operating in a highly competitive environment, with a constant pressure from
stakeholders and external forces impacts the decisions of the management Board, as it
was in this case.
m
increase the business units total productivity. According to strategic HRM, the HR
strategy should be developed alongside the general strategy of the organization, to
co
acquire cultural fit within and with the outside environment.
.
5.0 Conclusion
ay
Every organisation wants to be successful and depends upon its employees to make
that happen. Success should be viewed over the long term. A healthy organisation can
ss
go the distance and the best metric of success should be the health of the employees.
The most important issue of M&S is to build upon the companys already existing
strengths and try to overcome the threats of the change. One of the major benefits
eE
References
m
Burnes B. (2004) Managing Change: A Strategic Approach to Organisational Dynamics,
3d ed., London, Prentice Hall;
co
Doorewaard H. and Benschop Y. (2003) HRM and organizational change: an emotional
.
endeavor, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 16 Issue 3,
pp.272-286; ay
ss
Farquharson L. and Baum T. (2002) Enacting organisational change programmes: a
centre stage role for HRM?, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality
eE
Huang T. (2001) The effects of linkage between business and human resource
management strategies, Personnel Review, Vol. 30 Issue 2, pp.132-151;
Johnson G. and Scholes K. (2002) Exploring Corporate Strategy, 6th Edition, London,
Prentice Hall;
HRM in M&S
Liao Y. (2005) Business strategy and performance: the role of human resource
management control, Personnel Review, Vol. 34 Issue 3, pp.294-309;
m
. co
ay
ss
eE
lu
Va
HRM in M&S
BIBLIOGRAPHY
m
co
Bergenhenegouwen G. (1996) Competence development a challenge for HRM
professionals: core competences of organizations as guidelines for the
development of employees, Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 20
.
Issue 9, pp.29-35;
ay
Budhwar P. (2000) Evaluating levels of strategic integration and devolvement of human
ss
resource management in the UK, Personnel Review, Vol. 29 Issue 2, pp.141-
157;
eE
Chen L., Liaw S. and Lee S. (2003) Using an HRM pattern approach to examine the
productivity of manufacturing firms an empirical study, International Journal of
Manpower, Vol. 24 Issue 3, pp.299-318;
HRM in M&S
m
interdependence with organisational structure, Employee Relations, Vol. 21 Issue
5, pp.463-484;
co
Farquharson L. and Baum T. (2002) Enacting organisational change programmes: a
.
centre stage role for HRM?, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality
ay
Management, Vol. 14 Issue 5, pp.243-250;
ss
Francis H. (2002) The power of talk in HRM-based change, Personnel Review, Vol. 31
Issue 4, pp.432-448;
eE
Gibb S. (2001) The state of human resource management: evidence from employees
views of HRM systems and staff, Employee Relations, Vol. 23 Issue 4, pp.318-
336;
Hamel G. and Prahalad C. (1989) Strategic intent, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 67
Issue 3, pp.12-16;
Hamel G. and Prahalad C. (1990) The core competence of the corporation, Harvard
Business Review, Vol. 68 Issue 3, pp.25-27;
HRM in M&S
Huang T. (2001) The effects of linkage between business and human resource
management strategies, Personnel Review, Vol. 30 Issue 2, pp.132-151;
m
Hyland M. and Verreault D. (2003) Developing a strategic internal audit-human resource
management relationship: a model and survey, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol.
18 Issue 6, pp.465-477;
co
Johnson G. and Scholes K. (2002) Exploring Corporate Strategy, 6th Edition, London,
.
Prentice Hall;
ay
ss
Kane B. and Palmer I. (1995) Strategic HRM or managing the employment
relationship?, International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 16 Issue 5, pp.6-21;
Kane B., Crawford J. and Grant D. (1999) Barriers to effective HRM, International
lu
Kelliher C. and Perrett G. (2001) Business strategy and approaches to HRM A case
study of new developments in the United Kingdom restaurant industry, Personnel
Review, Vol. 30 Issue 4, pp.421-437;
Liao Y. (2005) Business strategy and performance: the role of human resource
management control, Personnel Review, Vol. 34 Issue 3, pp.294-309;
HRM in M&S
m
Othman R. and Poon J. (2000) What shapes HRM? A multivariate examination,
co
Employee Relations, Vol. 22 Issue 5, pp.467-480;
.
Panayotopoulou L. and Papalexandris N. (2004) Examining the link between human
ay
resource management orientation and firm performance, Personnel Review, Vol.
33 Issue 5, pp.499-520;
ss
Pichault F. and Schienaers F. (2003) HRM Practices in a Process of Organisational
Change: A Contextualist Perspective, Applied Psychology: An International
eE
Sheehan C. (2005) A model for HRM strategic integration, Personnel Review, Vol. 32
Issue 2, pp.192-209;