Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
2nd Hour
Hamlet Paper II
Hamlet starring Mel Gibson and Hamlet starring David Tennant are two film adaptations
of Shakespeare's classic tragedy Hamlet. The original play tells of the protagonist Hamlet and
his struggle to exact revenge on his Uncle who murdered his father, married his mother and
took the throne. Each of the films follow the original play fairly closely, with some slight
differences in places, but they do each present different interpretations of the Hamlet character
and his qualities. The two portrayals posses distinct similarities and differences, both of which
add to the interesting dynamic of the character.
The first, and most distinct point of comparison between Mel Gibsons Hamlet ( Gibson)
and David Tennants Hamlet (Tennant) is their productions interpretation and their portrayal of
Hamlets type of crazy. In Gibsons production, when Hamlet begins to go crazy, or say that he
puts an antic disposition on, it is a more natural crazy. This means that he is still fairly stoic in
his emotions, he does not run around, talk strangely or otherwise act goofy, but what he does is
perform subtle strange acts. For example, in the fishmonger scene, he is ripping out pages of
the book that he looks displeased with, but when he talks to Polonius he uses a normal register
and tone of voice. One important note is that Gibson does not say these tedious old fools at
the end of the fishmonger scene, which leads the audience to believe that perhaps his madness
is real and not faked. Gibsons Hamlet also acts fairly consistently with or without people in
scenes with him, he still has outbursts of anger when he is alone. This is a further indication that
his madness is sincere and not an act he is putting on, because he acts this way even when he
is alone. Tennants portrayal of Hamlet's madness on the other hand is very different from
Gibsons. In Tennants production, after the ghost visits him, the crazy that Tennant portrays is
very obvious, goofy, and almost childish. Tennant, when acting crazy, would run around, flail his
arms, make strange voices, his hair would be all askew, he would not have shoes on, and his
outfit would not fit others around him. For example, in the fishmonger scene, Tennant lays on
the ground, puts the book on his face, says words in a strange goofy voice, and to top it off
makes a very weird face when he says accept my life to Polonius. However, Tennant does say
these tedious old fools at the end of the scene. This along with other hints leads the audience
to believe, more than with Gibson, that Tennants Hamlets madness is an act. In Tennants
production, it is very obvious the difference in Hamlet's behavior when speaking to different
people. When Hamlet is talking to Horatio, he is always fairly normal, most certainly not a goofy
crazy. However, when he is with other people, Polonius especially, he is always acting
differently with his goofy outright madness. This change in his behavior is pretty obvious in the
production and would lead one to believe he is faking his madness.
There are some similarities however between how the two productions had the actors
portray Hamlets madness. Each production chose to display his madness partially through his
costume. Each actor had at least one shoe off at one point. Also, on a more subtle note, each
actor, when portraying craziness often used wide eyes to show his state of being. This was a
common gesture in both of the films, and was an indication of instability and intensity. Overall,
the two different types of crazy were very different from film to film, each going a different route
to display Hamlets character.
Another interesting point of comparison between the films is how they placed Hamlet on
screen and how that staging reflected on his character. In the Gibson version, Hamlet most
always entered the scene, or was at some point in the scene at a higher level than the rest of
the actors and the camera. On many occasions he would appear on a ledge above the camera
so it had to look up to him. This was an interesting choice because it could symbolize the status,
or high place a tragic hero must fall from in order to qualify as a tragic hero. Contrastly, Hamlet
in Tennants version would often sit or lay on the floor, so go to a lower level than everyone
else. Almost childlike, Tennent would often sit with his knees pulled in or lay on the ground,
especially whenever he saw his father's ghost. This characterizes him has more submissive.
This is a very distinct contrast, from the high up, powerful, noble prince, to the lowly, submissive,
childish prince. However, despite these differences, there were also similarities in the staging
and actions of the two Hamlets. One staging device that both utilized was grabbing and
directing the movements of other people (often women). In both productions Hamlet would grab
the arms or shoulders of other characters like Ophelia and Gertrude and move them from one
spot to another in a kind of controlling way. Additionally, in both productions Hamlet was very
mobile in his scenes. There was rarely a time when either of them were not moving or using the
space on the set. They were both often moving from place to place even for emphasis, but they
were nearly never still. This also shows more characterization and how on edge Hamlet was
with his state of responsibility.
These two productions portrayed Hamlet in very distinct and different ways. Though there were
some similarities, there were more contrasting points to the two actors performances. One
Hamlet was more manly, stoic, and natural in his madness, while the other was childish, goofy,
and submissive. Each role was played very well, and seeing the very different interpretations
was interesting. Both were effective in their own way by affecting the relationships between the
characters on screen as well as the audience's emotions.
____________________________________________________________________________
Emotion More stoic in his emotions, he seemed More timid and pouty in his
more manly in his presence because upsetness. He does not have
he did not show as much sad cry/ as good of a relationship with
weepy emotion- he did cry but he mother, in this way he seems
more got mad and very very angry less mature ( overall seems
less mature and manly). Not
as aggressive towards
Ophelia.
Action Has more mad/ angry fits and then Whenever he is upset he sits
goes back to being stoic on the ground and brings his
knees in ( like a child). He
He is much more aggressive- grabs also always sits or lays down
Ophelia and mother often, dragging or when he sees his father's
pulling them ghost- he is more submissive.
Had a very weird scene with mother in He used more of his body to
her bed and was very much grabby express his emotions ( arms,
and on her and kissed more. mouth, face)
He placed the skull on the ground and He actually holds the skull at
went down to it ( symbolizing his the end.
descent?)
This Hamlet appears to be
More intense fight scene. portrayed as more intellectual
Dies in Horatio's Arms - he has several of those wit-
offs still included and is
shown to outsmart Polonius
Type of Crazy Not obnoxious- he just does subtle He ruffles his hair after the
strange things like throwing book funeral/ wedding scene ( is
pages away. messy from then on)
Viewing Notes:
Mel Gibson
Shows disgust
towards Claudius
To be or not to be s:
talking in the place
where dad is buried
is very calm about it
all- keeps distance
from the actual bones
Type of Crazy
Not obnoxious-
strange actions like
throwing pages of
books away
One shoe
Aggressive towards
mother in that scene
Places skull on
ground and goes
down to it -
symbolizing his
descent?
Dies in Horatio's
arms
Staging Staging
Hamlet is often on an
above level as others
Camera is looking up
at him
Other Other
Camera shots are We do not see
often below looking Claudius talk to Roz
up at Hamlet and Gil
He cannot use a
sword correctly
Switched order or
soliloques
Raining when he
goes off to england
Looks at Sunset
before the last scene
OH! He starts from above when he enters scenes because in these plays they have to start
from high/ noble places and fall/ come down
Puts hamlet Up, makes him seem tougher and stuff - even the actor was more buff and macho
David Tennant
Hamlet Gurtrude Claudius Ophelia
Noticeably upset at Notices Hamlets Does not look as Looks like she does
announcement of upsetness at shooken when there not want to listen to
anouncement is the play- he is still her brothers advice
funeral and marriage
calm and collected
Not as giddy as the Sad and scared after
More timid and other one Looks almost smug hamlet came to her
teen/angsty than when saying he was right after seeing
tough Touched Hamlet but not cincere in his father
he didn't like it prayers
Does not seem to like Does not seem as
his mother as much Appears to have Pretty calm and scared of Hamlet -
as the other one more power- not a collected throughout breakup
powerless women
(strayed away from
Shrugs before Is very mad/crazy
her touch)
She looks like she drinking the poison after her father's
knows the cup is willingly- like it does death
Weepy to mad poisened not matter as much -
hamlet did not force it
Very Happy to see down his throat
Horatio
Type of Crazy
Fishmonger scene-
wide eyed, flaily, lays
upside down- acting
more childish and
absurd - not subtle at
all ( funny faces) - but
then says the tedious
old fools part
Does act more crazy
around Polonius
Suit and tie at Wore white when Wearing Black with Wearing floral shirts
Father's Funeral greeting Gil and Roz greeting Roz and Gil and dresses
(more modern) very
Same later - white Same later- black
put together
Shows more of
Hamlet manipulating
people ( Polonius and
the messenger guy )
with the difference in
opinion
He is often below- he
is below the king and
Claudius when he
speaks
Other Other Other Other
Uses Security Played by the same
camera shot format After the death of guy as Hamlet sr
polonius, both the
king and the queen <-----
Speaks directly to
are filmed through
Camera
broken mirrors
A little bit of
homosextual
suggestive-ness -
hugging and asking
them to play upon a
pipe
Has part long time ago stuff then modern things
Polonius is a bigger role it feels like - makes him seem less smart/ wise- really drives the point
that he is old and rambly and others are kind of annoyed with him because of how wordy or
wrong he kind of is - not respected - more annoying
His crazy is more obvious - and when he is alone he is not the same crazy as when he is with
people- leads to believe it is fake
Much more is the camera over Hamlet, opposite in the other one
This one does not take things as seriously it feels like- more emotional less serious