Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ECE/ICE/MEXE Department
Abstract This paper contains the step BJTs offer greater gain at the output than
by step process regarding on how weve FETs. They are usually the choice for
designed a transistor amplifier. Various precision, linearity, dealing w/ distortions, and
considerations were initiated before coming
gain. In terms of expense, FETs, especially
up with a final design. A common-emitter
configuration which is in voltage divider MOFSFETs, are more expensive to
biasing network was used to counter beta manufacture than BJTs. FETs normally are at a
fluctuations and stabilize the circuit. Class A higher price point, but not significant enough
amplifier type was used due to its linear to
characteristics, high voltage gain and as well push away from them. This is just a slight
as low percentage of distortions. Lastly, the drawback.
swamping principle was applied on the 2 nd
stage for the stability of voltage gain
transition and for the effective reduction of
gain to minimize clipping and distortions. There are three kinds of transistor
configuration that can be used for amplifying
I. INTRODUCTION signals: Common base transistor
configuration, Common emitter transistor
Amplifier is the generic term used to configuration, and Common collector
describe a circuit which increases its input transistor configuration. These configurations
signal. They are used in electronic circuits to vary with respect to gain, input and output
make an electronic signal bigger without impedance, current gain, and power gain as
affecting it in any other way. But not all well. One may use these configurations
amplifiers are the same as they are classified according to the desired specifications.
according to their circuit configurations and
Class A amplifiers are most commonly
methods of operation.
used type of amplifiers for its large voltage
gain. Its configuration is a common emitter
An electrical signal can be amplified by
that produce a large output voltage swing from
using a device which allows a small current or
a relatively small input voltage of only a few
voltage to control the flow of a much larger
millivolts. For Class A, the transistor is
current from a dc power source. Transistors are
working and is fully on all the time. By this
the basic device providing control of this kind.
reason, it has a low efficiency of less than 40%
There are two general types of transistors,
but good signal reproduction and linearity.
bipolar and field-effect. Very roughly, the
difference between these two types is that for Design simplicity, highest linear
bipolar devices an input current controls the characteristics, and low percentage of
large current flow through the device, while distortion makes a class A amplifier as the best
for field-effect transistors an input voltage class.
provides the control.
PRE-
D E S IG N G a th e rin g o f
S TA G E D a ta
II. OBJECTIVE D E S IG N IN G
S TA G E S t e p b y s te p
d e s ig n in g o f e a c h
General Objective: TRO BU LESH O O
s ta gl ea n d e rro r o n
T IN G S TA G E Tria
The aim of this course project is to design an s im u la t io n
amplifier with the following specifications: T E S T IN G
S TA G E Te s tin g th e
Gain= at least 400 (max800) a m p lifi e r o n th e
POUT = minimum at VSUPPLY= 12V PCB
RL= 1k
Frequency Range= 300Hz 20kHz Figure 1.1 Algorithm of creating this course
Max. Input Current= 10uA project
VO(SWING) = 4Vp.p
It is also required to put the circuit into PCB PRE-DESIGN STAGE
with a suitable case.
This stage serves as the starting block for
III. MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY the team to create the specified amplifier. The
team gather data and facts about the course
Amplifiers can be made by using different project from published works given by journals,
types of configurations. These configurations books, researches, online sites and other
would not be made without the basic electronic manuals that will help to support the
concept of this project.
components that sum up an amplifier.
Circuit 3 (Week 5)
Figure 2.1 b AC Sweep analysis
Circuit 2 (Week 3)
From the information that weve got Figure 2.3 d Actual Waveform
from our research, weve found out some
general rule of thumbs in calculating the
The previous circuit was connected analysis. No actual measurements were made
with a 2nd stage for more voltage amplification. for this circuit.
The 2nd stage was estimated in order to reach
the needed voltage swing together with the Circuit 5 (Week 10)
needed gain and frequency range. There is no
further analysis for the 2nd stage. We need to
provide a circuit with full range of reasonable
explanations.
Circuit 4 (Week 7)
3
6 V =4.5 V = Vc
4
Figure 2.6 d Transient Analysis
1
6 V =1.5 V =V E
4
Set ICQ = 1 mA
VC 4.5 V
RC = ; RC =
IC 1 mA
IC IE
1.5V
R E=
1mA
R E=1.5 k
Figure 3.1 c 2nd Stage
V2 4.5 V
I2 = IC =
R2 ; =0.7+ 1k
I 2 =200 A I C =4.5 mA ; I C I E
V CC V B I E 4.5 mA
R 1=
I2
For RE = VE/IE
C 1 330 (standard)
bypass= ; Re = Req//RE
2 f min R e
R2 < 10(Rc)
Cbypass = 22uF
1k < 3.3K
I2 = 2.2 mA
R1=4 .4545 k 4.7 k Z O =3197.2790
R1 4.7 k A VNL=122.9774
10 2nd Stage
bypass( R E 2)=
2 (300)(8.2)
V BB =2.1053 V
C
=1 70.1961
I C =4.5 mA
I B=26.5438 uA
I E =4.5264 mA
F
igure 3.1 d Load line Analysis
THEORETICAL COMPUTATIONS:
1st STAGE:
V BB =1.967 2V
Z i=580.4799
=1 50.2283
Ic = 1 mA Z O =689.6552
IE = 1.0067 mA
A VNL =49.4586
IB = 6.6565 uA
Two StagesCoupled :
Z i=2662.1298
Figure 3.1 g Two Port Model 2nd Calculate Simulate %
stage d d Difference
A V 1=1 8.8964 Ic 4.5 mA 4.34 mA 3.56 %
Ib 26.5438 25.5 uA 3.93 %
uA
A V 2=29.2714 IE 4.5265 4.37 uA 3.46 %
mA
A VT = 553.1241
Gain Calculated Simulated %
Frequency Response Difference
Av1 -18.8964 -18.6343 1.39%
Av2 -29.2714 -26.91 8.07 %
Total 553.1241 569.7699 3.01 %
Av
f L1 = 22.8780 Hz 23 Hz
f L2 =19.1497Hz 19 Hz
f L3 = 9.4194 Hz 9 Hz
fLe 1 308 Hz
Amplifier Casing
VII. REFERENCES
[5]