20170528-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION To Coroner Sara Hinchey J-Supplement 14

Page 1
Coroner Sara Hinchey J 28-5-2017

Coroners Court of Victoria
65 Kavanagh Street, Southbank, VIC 3006
5 Phone: 1300 309 519 Calling from overseas: (+61 3) 8688 0700
Fax: 1300 546 989
General enquires (including submissions of all Forms): courtadmin@coronerscourt.vic.gov.au
Coronial Admissions and Enquires Office: cae@coronerscourt.vic.gov.au
10 Ref: 20170528-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION to Coroner Sara Hinchey J-Supplement 14

Madam,
further to my 13 February 2017 submission and Supplement 1 and Supplement 2 of 13-
4-2017, Supplement 3+COMPLAINT of 14-4-2017, Supplement 4+COMPLAINT of 16-4-
2017, Supplement 5+COMPLAINTof 15-4-2017, Supplement 6 of 23-4-2017, Supplement 7 of
15 24-4-2017, Supplement 8 of 25-4-2017, Supplement 9 of 1-5-2017, Supplement 10 of 6-5-2017,
Supplement 11 of 19-5-2017, Supplement 12 of 21-5-2017, Supplement 13 of 25-5-2017, I hold
it appropriate to provide this Supplement 14 of 28-5-2017.
What I have been writing about is that a coroner not only should focus on the aftermath of a
20 killing but what really were the issues that started it all off. And regretfully little to no attention
is taken to the misuse and abuse of power in particular by politicians and law enforcement
agencies and others. For sure some issues are raised but others simply are never canvassed.
Without even having read the coroners report of NSW coroner Michael Barnes I doubt he went
into the legalities of the Iraq invasion. And this is where we overlook critical issues in a
25 coroners report that may be part of what may trigger a persons conduct, to become more violent
then otherwise may have eventuated. Not everyone who commit sex crimes will end up
committing murders. Often to change over to murder may have certain aggravating issues.
And we cannot ignore either if authorities themselves are directly/indirectly the cause of murder.
We used to have that taxation disclosure was confidential as the taxation office only interest was
30 to collect the right amount of taxation irrespective if the earnings came from lawful and/or
unlawful business activities. However, this has for long been gone as the ATO cross files its
provided details of a taxpayers with others and so disclose it. Either directly and/or indirectly.
Politicians eager to for example pursue child support have allowed the disclosure of earning by
others. Yet, multinational companies albeit unconstitutionally often do not pay a cent tax and still
35 can claim tax refund. The recent revelation that a Taxation Commissioner is either directly or
indirectly involved in a huge financial scam itself may be of concern. But there might be more
going on than most people might be aware. Because I publish my submission and supplements I
receive information of people who are concerned and this enables me a times to gain a greater
knowledge of what really has been going on.
40 We have legal principles embedded in the constitution but it seems they are meaningless when it
comes to politicians, the Victorian Police and the ATO, and in the process this might very well
have been part of why Carl Williams was violently murdered in prison. And people might rightly
claim the coroner is part of a cover up where the coroner may refuse to investigate matters,
merely because the Ombudsman did so to some extent. I will below set out some more details
45 about this.
Page 1 28-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by making a reservation, by fax
0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com
Page 2
I since 1982 have been conducting my private special lifeline service dealing with people who I
understand are con templating suicide, murder and even mass-murder. I may state that in 35
years I never had anyone as such who contacted me to actually proceed with it. I am just an
ordinary guy without any university education but who through SCHOOL OF LIFE learned
5 what real life was about and use this to assist others.
One of the issues that people make known to me they do not trust the police, the shrinks, etc. As
such, it often can be counterproductive if you are dealing with a person who actually has set
his/her focus upon wanting to die to try to negotiate with them. There is no modus operandi that
can be used upon every person as a conduct who is intend to commit suicide, murder or even
10 mass murder. It means every time when faced with a person with such an intent one has to go
along with the situation. One has to consider responses as the situation develops.
It would be utter foolish if not sheer stupidity to try to use a kind of conduct that succeeded in
another situation as if this would be the modus operandi to work by.
One of the things that has been conveyed afterwards by such persons was that I acted different
15 then they had expected, got their mind of it and I never told them not to go ahead. They made
clear that if I had tried to stop them then that is what they were expecting to do what they
contemplated.
What is important is to try to feel the hurt of the person that one is dealing with. Try to
understand their emotion and what they really are looking for.
20 I have never used religion as an issue albeit when I had to deal with a person who had a certain
religious belief then during the communication I felt as if I had that belief. I could feel the anger
this person had as it I had this anger. Once you so to say are in harmony with the person then
trust is very important. Every word you utter can make the difference between the person
proceedings or not with what was contemplated.
25 .
No use to try to talk a person out of what is contemplated because then you make the decision for
that person and as soon as this person is alone may then decide to go ahead. I learned this kind of
understanding when I was an insurance consultant. That is provide the prospective client with
different policies and let them choose which one the client desires. This is because if the person
30 decides they likely will never cancel the policy whereas if someone else decides for them then it
is a temporary view and they never really value the policy as they may have done by their own
choice.
Monis, considering his reported criminal conduct more than likely was intending to be killed. He
was likely expecting to be imprisoned for many years to come and while I have not read the
35 coroners report of Michael Barnes, I didnt think that Monis would have intended to come alive
out of the Caf. As such calling in negotiators to try to let hostages to go free may rather have
encouraged his stance to be maintained as he achieved in his view a position of power.
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/lindt-siege-findings-malcolm-turnbull-flags-changes-to-
make-defence-force-intervention-easier-20170524-gwc705.html
40 QUOTE
The Coroner did agree that Monis' demands to speak to then prime minister Tony Abbott could not be
agreed to under the rules but suggested that some other concessions to allow Monis to express himself,
perhaps through a broadcast statement read out by one of the hostages, could have helped build trust
and establish a pathway for a negotiated outcome.
45 END QUOTE
In my view Tony Abbott did the best thing he could have done, not to give him the power that he
could command the Prime Minister with threats.
In Victoria the youths are trashing detention centre and are reportedly rewarded pizzas and other
50 nonsense rather than to make clear they are subject to the Rule of Law and will have to pay for
the damages, etc. Those youths will grow up that criminality does pay!
'Vicious' Monis to blame for siege: Coroner - Sky News

Page 3
www.skynews.com.au/news/.../dpp-and-police--made-errors-over-monis--bail-.html
3 days ago - Coroner Michael Barnes has concluded Monis was narcissistic, antisocial, deluded
and lacked empathy, but the man he describes as 'a vicious ...
5 We had in recent days NSW coroner Michael Barnes handing down a finding regarding the Lindt
Caf siege, and as I expected politicians and others rather to try to understand matters
immediately are on the news as to what they propose to do.
10 QUOTE
With Australia's terror alert level remaining at "probable" in the immediate aftermath of the
Manchester atrocity, Mr Turnbull hinted at significant legislative changes, declaring "we must be
more agile than those who seek to do us harm - we will always work tirelessly to keep Australians
safe".
15 END QUOTE
QUOTE
20 The Prime Minister's comments to Parliament followed the release of the inquest findings in which
muted criticism were made of some Commonwealth law enforcement agencies for withholding security
and surveillance information about Monis, and amid ongoing speculation that Special
Forces commandos should have been deployed in the Sydney siege.
NSW State Coroner Michael Barnes branded those suggestions "simplistic and unrealistic" but
25 nonetheless recommended that the Turnbull government should consider changing the rules to make it
easier for the Australian Defence Force to take charge during terror incidents, given the evolving and
complex nature of terror threats.
He said in the Lindt Cafe siege, where 18 people were held hostage at gunpoint, the requisite conditions
did not exist for that military intervention, largely because the NSW Police Force believed it had the
30 matter in hand.
Mr Barnes cited the current law, Part IIIAAA of the Defence Act 1903, noting that "the NSW Police
Force considered it had the capacity to respond effectively to Monis' actions and did not advise the
NSW government otherwise".
He said the ADF could only intervene "and assume responsibility for such an incident if, on application
35 for assistance from a state or territory, the Commonwealth is satisfied that the state or territory's
police force is unable to mount an adequate response".
The finding is significant in light of claims by some experts that the NSW Police adopted the wrong
mindset from the beginning by treating the hostage crisis as a domestic siege rather than a terrorist
incident in which Monis always intended to die and to take innocents with him.
40 According to some experts, ADF snipers operating under different rules of engagement possessed the
higher grade of weapons and high-velocity hardened ammunition to shoot Monis through the cafe's
plate glass.
Mr Barnes noted that the challenge of modern terrorism exposes the inadequacy of existing
arrangements for the jurisdictional transfer of responsibility, including "the legislative and policy
45 framework for call-out".
Communications weaknesses, and an over-reliance on ill-informed psychological assessments
within the NSW Police Force management of the siege were not helped by the other systemic inter-
agency resistance, such as the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation's decision to
withhold information pertaining to Monis.
50 END QUOTE
And then consider also the following:

http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2017/05/25/australia-considers-making-it-easier-bring-army-terrorist-attacks
55 25 May 2017 - 8:00pm
Australia considers making it easier to bring in army in terrorist attacks
QUOTE
The review was one of the New South Wales coroner's recommendations in his report on the 2014 Sydney
siege.

Page 4
The Attorney-General says those coordinating the response to a terrorist attack should have every tool at their
disposal.
"Of course, we want to maintain the important distinction between the civilian power and the military
power. You don't usually use the military power for law-enforcement or policing operations, but, when
5 there's a terrorist episode, then, obviously, those fine legal distinctions are less important than getting
the best possible outcome."
END QUOTE
I posted on that article (the 21March 2016 date should be 21 December 2016):
10 QUOTE
Re George Brandis those fine legal distinctions are less important than getting the best possible outcome." Is
this man for real? He cannot ignore constitutional limitations!
As a CONSTITUTIONALIST, often disregarded by what I view would-be dictators like Malcolm
Turnbull such as when on 15 July 2016 I warned all politicians about contemplated mass-murder in Bourke
15 Street Mall and repeated the same on 21 March 2016 (see my submissions to the coroner for this also) (as can
be checked on my www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati blog) we do not need deployment of those sharpening
their knives to kill citizens Hansard 11-3-1891 Constitution convention Debates (Official Record of the
Debates of the National Australasian Convention) (Mr. GILLIES) Hansard 10-3-1891 Constitution
convention Debates ( Mr. DIBBS: The question of creating a standing army is one which, to my mind,
20 is almost more repulsive than the question of readjustment of territorial boundaries. It means the
existence in our midst of a certain number of idle men-men sharpening their knives and their swords
for the first fitting opportunity of fleshing them on the people of their own country, because we have no
other enemies.)
What we need is legal accountability for John Howard, Peter Cosgrove and others involved for what I
25 consider to be in the unconstitutional armed invasion into Iraq to be dealt with for their mass murder, treason,
crimes against humanity "To make the world a safer place" when we now endure murder and mayhem.
Disarm the citizens with False Flag Port Arthur and then deploy the army to enslave unconstitutionally that is
the citizens. The constitution providing for "domestic violence" means that not the Governor-General nor the
Prime Minister but the Governor of a State decides if due to civil unrest like civil war the army should be
30 called in. Nothing to do with an act of terrorism by some individual. Malcolm Turnbull says Australians are
not cowered wile politicians as cowards hide behind security! Hold them legally accountable and we may be
all better off.
END QUOTE
It must be clear that Monis had a gripe about the invasion into Iraq. I am the only person who
35 actually presented 4 times to the High Court of Australia my Section 75(v) of the constitution
application to prevent Australian troops to invade Iraq unless the Governor-General authorised
this by issuing a DECLARATION OF WAR naming Iraq and have this Gazetted. The High
Court of Australia even on 19 March 2003, the day of the invasion, refused to accept my
application for filing. It was unconstitutional for it to do so but so to say they were I suspect
40 following orders of their political masters or didnt want to upset the applecart as after all their
future might be at risk once they retire not getting special jobs for them Government, etc. As
Phillips J of the Supreme Court of Victoria in his prior retirement speech proved he didnt speak
up until he was to retire.
I have no doubt that I could have understood the anger within Monis about the unconstitutional
45 invasion. A police negotiator who has so to say been brainwashed that the murderous
unconstitutional invasion was legally valid I doubt would have had any ability to then understand
what Monis was about. No doubt he (Monis) deserved to be held legally accountable for any
crimes he had already committed and/or was suspected to have committed but it is the way you
deal with such a person that can make the difference as to avoiding death and destruction or not.
50 Here we had the Bourke Street Driver doing his wheelies at the intersection of Swanston and
Flinders Street, and all that I saw on the various videos was no attempt to try to communicate
with him, but the police sitting in their cars and effectively forcing him into Swanston Street
towards Bourke Street.
As I stated
55 QUOTE 20170425-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION to Coroner Sara Hinchey J-Supplement 8
Page 5
As I exposed, VicRoad is applying penalty points at times double then was incurred and by this
wrongly can purportedly suspend a driver to drive even so in real terms the driver is entitled to drive
because he didnt incur those demit points as such. What we have is not even some tribunal but a non-
existing kind of tribunal that robs a citizen of his rights to have a trial by jury, etc.
5 END QUOTE 20170425-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION to Coroner Sara Hinchey J-Supplement 8
QUOTE 20170501-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION to Coroner Sara Hinchey J-Supplement 9

Another problem is that I discovered that VicRoads is putting demerit points against a persons license
without any legal justification. Then we have reports that the number of people driving disqualified is
10 increasing, when in fact as I explored many are wrongly/unlawfully disqualified. Tell that to a professional
driver who lost his job, his family mortgage repayments, and his family because someone at VicRoads
wrongly put demerit points against his license where none should have been. Tell this to a driver fined and
having demerit points against his license for driving an unregistered vehicle when in fact, so I was personally
advised and given the understanding by a VicRoad manager they are holding thousands upon thousands of
15 paid registration monies in a file unallocated to specific licenses/registration renewals. As a matter of fact I
came across this when query why my sons license had not been extended and was given the understanding it
was not paid. I produced bank records with the details but the manager (after some search) came back no
records showed such payments. I urged to look again and the complaint was there were thousands of
payments not allocated and it would take time to go through it all. I explained I would wait. Well then
20 another manager got involved and within minutes the payment was located. It means that VicRoads
administration or better to state misadministration/maladministration is the real culprit where people are
unduly dragged through the courts and may very well have paid for license renewals/registration renewals but
unable to prove at the time with records having done so. It is quite frankly beyond me why VicRoads doesnt
bother to refund the monies if it cannot allocate (at least so it claims) to the payer so that the payer is aware
25 the monies are not put towards a license/registration renewal. The cancelation of the window registration
sticker also has resulted that people borrow a car in good faith and then get pulled over driving an
unregistered vehicle. They simply have no way to be able to check if the vehicle is registered or not, because
the Victorian Government no longer issue window registration labels. The owner of the vehicle may have
paid the renewal but VicRoads may have wrongly placed into a holding account without allocating it.
30 .
One problem associated with it might be that often payment details are miniscule and so a payer may in error
used an incorrect number. I often have to resort to using a microscope to read the small letter print of the
relevant numbers. There appear to me no system in place where the moment renewal of a license/registration
has not been recorded as paid then a written notification is provider to the registered owner/license holder
35 until; months later. Why wait months and not do so at the date of the payment is claimed not to have been
received?
END QUOTE 20170501-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION to Coroner Sara Hinchey J-Supplement 9
People are getting upset about this and numerous other matters and well all it needs is the straw
40 that breaks the camels back and you may get a person to go of the rail and do things that they
may never have done had they not been pushed that far.
Once they have done a criminal event they might rather stick to it and not display any sorrow as
after all they are likely in prison and wouldnt want to be seen as some weakling.
45 What we need is not like Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and Attorney-General George
Brandis to let all kinds of nonsense fall of their lips but to try to get some real education and try
to avoid to cause more conflicts. They are (a major) part of the problem and not the solution.
.
The Framers of the Constitution made clear:
50
Hansard 10-3-1891 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
Australasian Convention)
QUOTE
Our own police are quite sufficient for the preservation of order within.
55 END QUOTE
QUOTE
119 Protection of States from invasion and violence
The Commonwealth shall protect every State against invasion and, on the application of the
60 Executive Government of the State, against domestic violence.
Page 6
END QUOTE
Hansard- 1898 index to subjects

QUOTE
5 Clause 112-(Protection of states from invasion and domestic violence), 691. Amendment by Mr. Gordon to
substitute "attack" for invasion, 691. Amendment withdrawn, 692. Amendment suggested by the Legislative
Council of Victoria enabling the Commonwealth to intervene for the protection of a state against domestic
violence, when, "in the opinion of the Governor-General," the intervention is necessary for the preservation
of the public peace, negatived, 692; clause agreed to, 692
10 END QUOTE
Hansard 11-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

QUOTE
Mr. SYMON.-Yes; and I am not sure that the Constitution as it stands is not elastic enough to permit
15 of the Federal Parliament coming to the rescue of a state in a financial difficulty. It ought to be, and
probably is, within the power of the [start page 846] Constitution to preserve a state from bankruptcy,
just as much as from extinction in any other way. We have a clause in this Constitution which obliges
the Commonwealth to protect the states against foreign aggression and domestic violence. That is
clause 112, and financial stress may be very nearly as disastrous to a state.
20 Mr. LEWIS.-Ought not that to be expressed?
Mr. SYMON.-If there is a doubt on that subject, it might and ought to be expressed. I am not sure
that it need be expressed, and for this reason. It would be within the power of the Federal Parliament
to come to the rescue of a state against foreign aggression, and the serious point is whether we should
not gravely consider the advisability of having a power in the Constitution to enable the
25 Commonwealth to come to the relief of a state in time of financial disaster. The destruction of a state
may just as much be involved in financial trouble or in bankruptcy as in a foreign invasion. The whole
object of the Commonwealth is to maintain the existence and the prosperity of the different states. In
all probability the representatives in the Federal Parliament would not stand idly by and see any state
reduced to financial straits, but would find some method under the Constitution of preventing such an
30 unfortunate result.
Mr. KINGSTON.-It might encourage reckless provincial finance.
Mr. SYMON.-I am not at all oblivious to the difficulties that might arise, and to the objections to it. It
might, of course, produce less care and less prudence in the financial arrangements of the states; but,
on the other hand, each state would have the fear of the Federal Parliament before its eyes, and we
35 know that the Federal Parliament would not take any steps which would have the effect of inducing
such extravagance as would be likely to bring about an appeal to the Federal Exchequer. I do not
desire to add anything further. I do not propose to enter into any details as to the figures. I have
endeavoured to refer to the principles which I think underlie this scheme, and those principles
commend themselves to my mind so far as I am able to appreciate them. I have made these
40 observations in order that I might be clear as to what this scheme meant. The exceedingly interesting
and instructive remarks of my honorable friend (Dr. Quick) this morning have assisted very much to
make clear what really is the intention of this method. I hope, and I believe, that this scheme will be
favorably received and favorably considered. On the face of it it seems to me to be a combination of
prudence and of boldness. It has got rid of all the trouble involved in our endeavour to finally
45 determine and settle now the question of how this money should be distributed at a distance of seven
years from the time at which we are operating, in a country in which the changes are frequent, where
ups and downs are constantly occurring, and where no man can tell what the outcome may be a year
hence of either the political policy, or the social or commercial progress, at the present moment. I
believe this scheme will receive general acceptance, and that it will do much, perhaps more than we can
50 at this moment realize, to finally settle this question, and to bring about the early accomplishment of
the great issue upon which we are engaged.
END QUOTE
It may be noted that s96 provisions was rejected but added to the constitution at the Premiers
55 conference but it is clear only in case of a State being in dire financial straits. However it is now
unconstitutionally used to so to say blackmail the states and as to pork barrelling for votes.
Politicians simply do not care less about constitutional constrains well aware that for ordinary
people to take them on in court (as I did about the unconstitutional invasion into Iraq) the judges
so to say are in their pockets to prevent any attempt as much as possible to challenge the
60 unconstitutional conduct. This is also why people may in the end having lost what is dear to
Page 7
them, being it a child due to vaccination forced upon them or otherwise, then simply want to end
it all and well take others with them.
It is to understand this kind of reasoning that can be the difference between avoiding a serious
escalation or not.
5 .
What we however is that Attorney-General appears to see it as a fine legal technicality and
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull sees it as another opportunity to engage in bizarre oppressive
legislation that will not solve for one of iota the anger within the general community and so only
may cause a compounding effect of anger.
10
QUOTE
Clause 112-The Commonwealth shall protect every state against invasion, and, on the application of
the Executive Government of a state, against domestic violence.
15 Mr. GORDON (South Australia).-I beg to move-
That the word "invasion" (line 2) be struck out, and the word "attack" substituted.
Why should the protection of the Commonwealth be confined only to invasion? We are not likely ever to be
invaded, but we are exceedingly likely to be attacked.
Mr. BARTON.-Any attack is an invasion in the sense in which the word is used in this clause.
20 Mr. GORDON.-The gunning by a cruiser standing off a city is not an invasion, but it is an attack.
Mr. BARTON.-It is an attack which is part of an invasion; if the attack succeeds invasion follows.
Mr. GORDON.-I think "attack" is very much better. Of course, if the word "invasion" covers the ground,
well and good; but while "attack" covers "invasion," does "invasion" cover "attack"? Originally, the
amendment I intended to move used both the words "attack" and "invasion."
25 Mr. REID.-You can repel an invasion 100 miles from the coast.
Mr. GORDON.-But how does the honorable member know that an invasion is intended?
[start page 692]
Mr. REID.-If there was a war between two countries, and a cruiser from the one country was approaching
the other, you would know that it was not on a visit of brotherly love.
30 Mr. GORDON.-They may not intend to invade the chances are that they do not intend to invade, but to
attack.
Mr. BARTON.-Do you think that the Commonwealth, if a hostile fleet appeared for the purpose of
attacking, and not invading, would keep the batteries silent and the Australian fleet at anchor?
Mr. GORDON.-Something may turn upon this. By this clause the Common-wealth is only bound to
35 protect every state against invasion. If the Commonwealth neglected its duty, and South Australia was
invaded, South Australia would have a claim against the Commonwealth. But, it appears to me, that it should
have an equal claim against the Commonwealth if it was simply attacked, and not invaded. However, if the
leader of the Convention thinks that "invasion" covers "attack," I am willing to leave the matter to the
Drafting Committee, but I have some doubt on the point.

Page 8
Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-I am perfectly satisfied that when the guns are booming there will
be no discussion about the meaning of the two words.
Mr. GORDON.-Ought the construction of this Act to be left until the guns are booming? I thought
the object was to prevent the guns booming at all.
5 Mr. HOLDER (South Australia).-I think there is something in the point raised by my honorable friend
(Mr. Gordon). We have previously used separately the terms "naval" and "military." Now, an attack would be
naval, while an invasion would be military.
The CHAIRMAN.-Does the honorable member (Mr. Gordon) press his amendment?
Mr. GORDON.-No. If the leader of the Convention relies on his booming guns I am content.
10 The amendment was withdrawn.
Amendment suggested by the Legislative Council of Victoria-
After "state" insert "or where in the opinion of the Governor-General it is necessary for the preservation of
the public peace."
Mr. GORDON.-I object most strongly to this interference with the state. The state is the proper party
15 to ask for protection, and not the Governor-General, who is not a resident of the state, and may be
badly advised.
Mr. BARTON.-The state should be entitled to demand protection.
The amendment was negatived.
Clause 112 was agreed to.
20 END QUOTE
It must be clear that the above quotation shows that it is not for the Governor-General at
all to decide if Australian troops shall be deployed in a State.
25 Hansard 20-4-1897 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE
Clause 111-Protection of States from invasion-agreed to.
END QUOTE
30 Hansard index 1891

QUOTE
19. The Commonwealth shall protect every State against invasion and, on the application of the
Executive Government of a State, against domestic violence.
END QUOTE
35
QUOTE
We now come to a most dangerous point in connection with the proceedings of this Convention. I hope
that the 4th resolution, dealing with the question of military and naval defence, will receive the most
40 anxious consideration of the delegates. I hope that the words which fell last evening from the lips of the
hon. member, Sir George Grey-words which bear the weight of great experience-will be taken to heart
by those who may form the federal government. The question of creating a standing army is one which, to
my mind, is almost more repulsive than the question of readjustment of territorial boundaries. It means the
existence in our midst of a certain number of idle men-men sharpening their knives and their swords
45 for the first fitting opportunity of fleshing them on the people of their own country, because we have no
other enemies. We, in Australia-federated Australia, I may take it, because the matter is one which
applies to the whole-have no enemies within our borders; we have no Indians to dispute with us the
Page 9
possession of the soil; we have no powerful Maori race, to fight, as was once the case in New Zealand,
for the territory the right to which belonged to the Maoris themselves. We have no enemies within, and
the only thing we have to fear is the possibility of any assault on the mother country by her enemies from
without, unless indeed the creation of a standing army proves a menace to the people of Australia by the
5 existence of an armed force for unlawful purposes. This question of the creation of a military force is one
of the blots upon these resolutions. We want no military force within New South Wales. All we want to
do is to make every man who is either a native of the soil, or one of ourselves by reason of his taking up
his residence amongst us, prepare to resist possible invasion from without. Who are our enemies? Who
are our enemies but the enemies of England, and they, so long as we remain under the Crown, will be dealt
10 with by an outer barrier, an outer bulwark in the defence of Australia, in the shape of the navy of Old
England. But we have no enemies within, and there is no necessity to fasten the curse of a standing army
upon us. As was pointed out by the hon. member, Sir George Grey, yesterday, in his interesting speech,
we have no necessity to keep a large standing army at a large cost to the people of the country, [start
page 185] when we have no enemies with whom they will have to fight. Our own police are quite
15 sufficient for the preservation of order within. In the event of invasion from without, so long as we
remain under the Crown, our enemies, being the enemies of England, will be dealt with before ever an
attempt is made to invade these shores; and when the day of invasion comes the people of this country
will rise as one man to defend their hearths and homes from any possible aggressor. I look upon the
question of the creation of a military power within a territory under the Crown as a menace to the
20 people who are to continue as British subjects. We have been sent here by our various parliaments to
frame a constitution under the Crown-under the Crown, bear in mind. That is the idea which has been
put forward in every speech that has been made. I presume, then, that the members of the Convention
are prepared at once to give the go-by altogether to the idea of imperial federation. So long as we
remain in our present position as individual colonies, we are imperially federated, and we can be imperially
25 federated in no stronger manner than in connection with our relation to the mother country. We are as much
imperially federated as the people living in the cities of London, Liverpool, Manchester, or other large
centres of population. We are a portion of the British Crown, joined together by the most solemn ties and
obligations; and we have to bear the brunt of any misfortune which may fall upon us in connection with any
attack upon our shores by reason of our enemies being the common enemies of England. We have already
30 made certain provision, partially of a federal character, to assist the Imperial Government in the
protection of our shores from without; but let us set our faces as a young nation-if I may use the word
"nation" in advance-against standing armies; let us set our face once and for ever against the creation
of anything like a military despotism. We are met here under the Crown, and I must say that, as one
possessing a slight tinge of republican notions, as one who sees that the future of Australia is to be what was
35 prophesied of it fifty years ago, by poets who have written of what the future of Australia is to be-having a
certain tinge of republicanism in my nature, the result naturally of my being a descendant of an Englishman, I
was surprised to find a gentleman occupying a position under the Crown proposing what 100 years ago would
have been simply regarded as high treason. Why, the other day the hon. member, Mr. Munro, made a
proposal with regard to one phase of the question which made me ejaculate, "One strand of the painter
40 has gone."
END QUOTE
It should be understood that unless the executive government of a State request assistance in
regard of domestic violence which is not meaning domestic violence as in an ordinary
45 household environment, but to mean something like civil war, the Commonwealth cannot get
involved. And as I wrote about many years ago the Australian federal Police has absolutely no
legal authority to operate within the State jurisdiction. It certainly is not about some person like
Monis holding hostages captive. It is a Commonwealth agency without any powers within a
State. (In the Netherlands they have the Federal Police which operates outside towns and the
50 local police which operates within the town.) It is also why I objected against the Australian
federal Police breaking down doors in Melbourne and harassing citizens merely because they
happened to be Muslims some 10 odd years ago. We have created by this hatred and well we so
to say are now paying the price for this. I may deplore it but I can understand that we created this
evil by allowing violations against the constitution to go unpunished.
55 If anything the politicians simply are more like vultures waiting for incidents that they can
possibly expand their draconic laws. That too seemed to me to be the policy of the politicians not
to act upon my various warnings specifically referring to Bourke Street Mall and bollards, etc,
where it could have been anywhere else in the Commonwealth of Australia.
Page 10
We have this notion by politicians they are above the rule of law and can get away with it all.
We now have this unconstitutional conduct to with holds tax benefits from parents who for
whatever reason do not want to risk their child on certain vaccinations.
5 And I can envisage that in time some parent will not just pursue to commit suicide but also
murder/mass-murder to make clear if you pursue the unconstitutional harming of a child then
well the Rule of law has no meaning. In my view there is no constitutional validity in denying a
parent tax benefits regarding refusal of immunisation. People left powerless have regretfully no
option but to use their kind of response that may include killing other innocent people. It is
10 simply that if you disregard the rights of individuals then they in turn may act likewise in kind.
Sometimes a parent cannot continue with life after they lose their child and then rather commit
suicide then forever having to life with the loss of their child. While I am in principle opposed to
suicide I can however understand why some people may rather find this as the best solution for
them. Where however a child dies because of government unconstitutional enforcement of
15 vaccination then so to say hell can break lose upon anyone.
http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-03-05-autism-mercury-thimerosal-and-vaccines-natural-
news-releases-collection-of-scientific-knowledge-thats-been-suppressed.html
QUOTE
20 Autism, mercury, thimerosal and vaccines: Natural News releases
large collection of scientific knowledge thats been suppressed by
the FDA, CDC and pharma-controlled media
Sunday, March 05, 2017 by: Mike Adams
Tags: autism, Damage, mercury, MMR vaccines, Natural.news, science, scientific studies, Thimerosal,
25 vaccines
(IMAGE NOT INCLUDED)
(Natural News) The fake news media (CNN, WashPo, NYT, etc.) doesnt want you to see any of the scientific
30 evidence presented here for the simple reason that it shows mercury in vaccines is damaging to children.
If printed, the collection of studies and author citations found here is over 50 pages in length, and it reveals
precisely what the pharma-controlled fake news media doesnt want you to know. Yes, there is an
overwhelming amount of scientific evidence that conclusively and convincingly establishes the irrefutable
fact that mercury is toxic when injected into the bodies of children via vaccines. Despite the fact that all this
35 evidence exists, there is no more dangerous utterance a person can say in todays pharma-monopolized
corporate science society than, simply, Mercury should be removed from all vaccines.
Poisoning children to protect profits
The very idea that mercury might be harmful to inject into children, if acknowledged as true, would require the
vaccine industry to effectively admit that it has been knowingly poisoning millions of children for decades
40 and did nothing to stop it. Any embracing of the real science linking mercury to neurodevelopmental damage is
simultaneously an admission of guilt by the criminally-run vaccine industry and they arent going to admit to
any guilt at all, even if it means poisoning millions more children for years to come.
Meanwhile, the loss of cognitive capacity across the U.S. population due to mercury in vaccines is estimated
to be tens of millions of aggregate IQ points lost each year across the population. Mercury-laced
45 vaccinations are literally a mass dumbing down of the population via chemical assault. Brains are being
damaged and lives destroyed every single day that mercury continues to be allowed in vaccines
especially those given to children and expectant mothers. Read this Natural News story to see the
documented proof that Californias HHS Secretary openly encourages injecting children with mercury-laden
vaccines.
50 That is exactly why the mercury poisoning of our children must be stopped. Mercury must be removed
from all vaccines, and those children provably harmed by mercury from immunizations must be allowed their
Page 11
day in court. (A real court, not the vaccine injury kangaroo court thats essentially run by the pharmaceutical
industry.)
Read this astonishing collection of evidence yourself, and learn what the vaccine industry and its fake news
media collaborators desperately hopes you never discover.
5 Scientific studies
A comparative evaluation of the effects of MMR immunization
and mercury doses from thimerosal-containing childhood
vaccines on the population prevalence of autism
http://science.naturalnews.com/pubmed/14976450.html
10 Publication: Med. Sci. Monit. 2004 Mar ;10(3)::PI33-9.
Publication Date: 2004 Mar
Study Author(s): Geier, David A;Geier, Mark R;
It was determined that there was a close correlation between mercury doses from thimerosalcontaining
childhood vaccines and the prevalence of autism from the late 1980s through the mid-1990s. In contrast, there
15 was a potential correlation between the number of primary pediatric measles-containing vaccines administered
and the prevalence of autism during the 1980s. In addition, it was found that there were statistically significant
odds ratios for the development of autism following increasing doses of mercury from thimerosal-containing
vaccines (birth cohorts: 1985 and 1990-1995) in comparison to a baseline measurement (birth cohort: 1984).
The contribution of thimerosal from childhood vaccines (>50% effect) was greater than MMR vaccine on the
20 prevalence of autism observed in this study.
CONCLUSIONS : The results of this study agree with a number of previously published studies. These studies
have shown that there is biological plausibility and epidemiological evidence showing a direct relationship
between increasing doses of mercury from thimerosal-containing vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders,
and measles-containing vaccines and serious neurological disorders. It is recommended that thimerosal be
25 removed from all vaccines, and additional research be undertaken to produce a MMR vaccine with an
improved safety profile.
Mercury and autism: accelerating evidence?

Publication: Neuro Endocrinol. Lett. 2005 Oct ;26(5)::439-46.
30 Publication Date: 2005 Oct
Study Author(s): Mutter, Joachim;Naumann, Johannes;Schneider, Rainer;Walach, Harald;Haley, Boyd;
Institution: Institute for Environmental Medicine and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Freiburg,
Germany.
Recently, it was found that autistic children had a higher mercury exposure during pregnancy due to maternal
35 dental amalgam and thimerosal-containing immunoglobulin shots. It was hypothesized that children with
autism have a decreased detoxification capacity due to genetic polymorphism. In vitro, mercury and thimerosal
in levels found several days after vaccination inhibit methionine synthetase (MS) by 50%. Normal function of
MS is crucial in biochemical steps necessary for brain development, attention and production of glutathione,
an important antioxidative and detoxifying agent. Repetitive doses of thimerosal leads to neurobehavioral
40 deteriorations in autoimmune susceptible mice, increased oxidative stress and decreased intracellular levels of
glutathione in vitro. Subsequently, autistic children have significantly decreased level of reduced glutathione.
Promising treatments of autism involve detoxification of mercury, and supplementation of deficient metabolites.

Page 12
Autism: a novel form of mercury poisoning
Publication: Med. Hypotheses 2001 Apr ;56(4)::462-71.
Publication Date: 2001 Apr
5 Study Author(s): Bernard, S;Enayati, A;Redwood, L;Roger, H;Binstock, T;
Institution: ARC Research, Cranford, New Jersey 07901, USA
Autism is a syndrome characterized by impairments in social relatedness and communication, repetitive

behaviors, abnormal movements, and sensory dysfunction. Recent epidemiological studies suggest that
autism may affect 1 in 150 US children. Exposure to mercury can cause immune, sensory, neurological,
10 motor, and behavioral dysfunctions similar to traits defining or associated with autism, and the similarities
extend to neuroanatomy, neurotransmitters, and biochemistry. Thimerosal, a preservative added to many
vaccines, has become a major source of mercury in children who, within their first two years, may have
received a quantity of mercury that exceeds safety guidelines. A review of medical literature and US
government data suggests that: (i) many cases of idiopathic autism are induced by early mercury exposure
15 from thimerosal; (ii) this type of autism represents an unrecognized mercurial syndrome; and (iii) genetic and
non-genetic factors establish a predisposition whereby thimerosals adverse effects occur only in some
children.
Research quotes on mercury, Thimerosal, vaccines and autism
Those studies link thimerosal to a vast inventory of grim neurological disorders now epidemic in children,
20 including ADD, ADHD, speech delay, tics, ASD, and autism. Other studies demonstrate Thimerosals
causation to asthma and a tenfold increase in Alzheimers in adults exposed to Thimerosal-laced flu shots.
During three years of research, we were not able to find a single credible study in the open public health
literature that shows thimerosal to be safe. These impacts are no surprise. Mercury is a potent brain poison
hundreds of times more toxic than lead. Science shows that the ethyl mercury in thimerosal is fifty times as
25 toxic to brain cells and twice as persistent in the brain as the heavily regulated methylmercury in fish.
Thimerosal is so toxic that when a doctor carelessly shatters a multidose flu vial, state laws require evacuation
of the building and clean-up by trained hazmat crews wearing protective boots, gloves, and respirators.
Common sense should tell us that its not a good idea to inject this poison into infants or expectant mothers.
Vaccine Whistleblower Exposing Autism Research Fraud at the CDC by Kevin Barry, Esq.
30 END QUOTE
A parent is expected to appropriately care for a child and then the Government then forces the
parent to cause vaccination no matter how harmful this might be! It doesnt take this kind of s
stand against drug users who are causing harm not just to themselves but are causing problems to
35 society at large. The government doesnt do so against homosexuality, in fact promotes it, and
yet when it comes to smokers then even so the sale of cigarettes is lawful the smokers are
punished and so targeted for this by higher taxation.
We have a government system (State/Federal) totally out of hand and that is why there are people
40 ending up at times wanting to kill innocent people as to attract maximum publicity about why
they did so. Just killing one selves is unlikely to make any commotion but to try to kill as many
as possible innocent people will for sure attract media attention and perhaps questions will be
asked. Why? and this is the problem that we lack really a proper system to ensure that ordinary
people can obtain justice.
45
Getting back to the Carl Williams issue I understand the coroner refused to investigate his
unlawful death and one has to ask why on earth? After all the man was sentenced by the court to
imprisonment and as such was under the authority of the Court to remain in prison for the time so
Page 13
ordered for incarceration until his sentence had been completed. While I heard at times brief
comments about Carl Williams being a person who seldom watch television I am and remain
open minded about matters. I have already complained that my correspondences to the Coroners
Courts seems to be intercepted by agents of the Victorian Department of Justice which I find
5 very much violating confidentiality and indeed undermine the ability of any whistle-blower to in
confidence provide details. Below I reproduce some documentation which I view should be of
concern to any fair dinkum coroner.

Page 14
5 This correspondence indicated that the ATO claimed at that time a total of $574,294.90 against
Carl Williams father George Williams (now deceased). I understand that the Victorian Police
made a deal with Carl Williams to pay the monies the ATO claimed against his father George
William as part of a deal for him to be a witness for the prosecution in regard of certain matters. I
understand the Victorian Police did so as to have paid to the ATO the sum of $576.000.00. As
10 such the ATO claimed tax debt against George Williams was settled, and no further monies were
claimed by the ATO. However, one Carl Williams was murdered in prison 19 April 2010, I
understand that the ATO then refunded the monies to the Victorian Police and then recreated a
debt against George Williams as if the account never had been settled. I understand the ATO
Page 15
now claims somewhere around $900,000.00 (including interest). Apparently it was claimed that
the Victorian Police in error paid the monies to the ASTO. Well, if the Victorian Police
purportedly paid such large amount in error than one has to ask how often they make such an
error. To me this is plainly crap. As Carl Williams was murdered while in the care of the State
5 Government under authority of court orders, (Betty King J, etc) then surely it failure to protect
Carl Williams cannot mean it can no reneg upon what was originally an agreement.
It appears to be clear that Carl Williams didnt himself fail to full fill any conditions he
undertook, rather that the State of Victoria I view in CONTEMPT OF COURT failed to ensure
10 the safety of Carl Williams. It then shouldnt have a financial benefit out of his death to reclaim
monies.
Regardless what one may view about Carl Williams, he was unlawfully killed in prison and
because of that any further evidence he was to give was clearly prevented for him to do so.
Carl Williams was not send to prison to be executed and as such any killing of his person was
15 unlawful.
While it is claimed that the Ombudsman (an agent for the Parliament) had investigated the
murder of Carl Williams this I view cannot exonerate the responsibility of the coroner to not
have investigated the murder. The Ombudsman clearly as an agent for the Parliament is not
impartial.
20 The danger is that any prisoner seeking to cooperate with the Victorian Police or other law
enforcement authority may now be placed at risk to be murdered and perhaps so with the
direct/indirect involvement of the authorities.
After all the Victorian Police may have had a motive of $576,000.00 to have Carl Williams
murdered so it could claim it back from the ATO.
25 One has to consider if the ATO merely seemed to have made an assessment against George
Williams but I am not aware actually had a court order for the same, may have engaged in
Page 16
extortion to recreate the debt and then claim it against the property that George Williams as I
understand it, left to his granddaughter Dakota Williams.
What the ATO may be involved is in perverting the course of justice and extortion and fraud, etc.
If a person A has a tax debt (or alleged tax debt) and B pays this then surely it cannot be
5 deemed to be an error. Certainly not regarding $576,000.00 not being a small amount.
One therefore have to ask was it an inside job to have Carl Williams murdered as the Victorian
Police and/or others held that they had ample out of Carl Williams and now no longer had a need
for him (In view of Betty King J comments about Carl Williams even so I understand Carl
Williams himself maintained HE HAD BEEN TELLING THE TRUTH)
10 I understand that Carl Williams exposed perjury by staff of the government and as such where
his reliability no longer was as much relevant and exposing perjury, etc, he might have become a
liability to the authorities and having him permanently disposed of might have been the better
way.
Regardless of his criminal history it never should be taken against his daughter Dakota who I
15 understand he adored and sacrificed his own safety ass to get the best for her. I understand that as
a deal with the prosecution he was entitled to rewards and they were now robbed not from him
but from his daughter in a manner that would be a warning that you cannot trust the authorities
because they will rob you no matter what.
Because of my publication 20170525-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION to
20 Coroner Sara Hinchey J-Supplement 13 I was provided with copies of the above
documentation.
We have a judiciary and the Parliament has no powers to apply a permanent secondary
punishment merely to serve the Government of the Day.
The document can be downloaded from:
25 https://www.scribd.com/document/349376197/20170525-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-Re-SUBMISSION-to-
Coroner-Sara-Hinchey-J-Supplement-13
A 9 year old girl innocent of any wrongdoing has her father brutally murdered while he is held in
care of the State Government, who clearly failed its Duty of Care, and then the authorities set out
30 to rob this 9 year old girl of the benefits of her inheritance from her grandfather to have to pay or
lose the monies the ATO I view fraudulently is claiming.
The coroner is now dealing with a mass-murder in Bourke Street and well I view the driver could
hardly trust the authorities to give them any information risking to be perhaps next in line to be
murdered. I view a coroner never can disregard such a serious matter.
35
I make it clear I never had any personal contact with Carl Williams or his father George
Williams, and I personally have the general view that no person has the right to kill another
person. However, I am not judgmental upon those who do or did as it is for the courts to decide
matters based upon what is presented before the court by full disclosure by the prosecution.
40
It is totally irrelevant if a person may desire to have some criminal killed, as after all we in a
society have to follow the rule of law and I view likewise so the authorities. Regretfully it
appears that when it comes to Authorities they can fabricate anything and usually get away with
it.
45 When then you had a person like Monis, who likely was facing a long spell in prison and
possible deportation to Iran then negotiators would have a difficult position to try to convince
such a person to peacefully hand himself over with the likelihood the authorities will betray
anything that was negotiated. After all Carl Williams death and the subsequent conduct by the
authorities to re-claim monies may be a clear example of this.
50 .
In my view the Australian Federal Police should investigate the ATO about its conduct as I view
this is a very serious matter. Regardless if the parliament may or may not have provided for
legislation for the ATO to harness bank accounts, etc, in the end the Framers of the constitution
Page 17
made clear that there was a legal principle that both sides be heard before a court and as such
the ATO cannot in my view rely upon robbing some child of her inheritance merely because
Parliament may have provided for some tactic to do so when there was no court order obtained
where the ATO had divulged the true relevant circumstances.
5 The Framers of the Constitution also made clear:
QUOTE
Mr. ISAACS.-I should hope that the expenditure caused by a bush fire would not be part of an
10 annual service.
Mr. MCMILLAN.-Would it not into the Appropriation Bill?
Mr. ISAACS.-Yes; but not as an annual service.
Mr. MCMILLAN.-The annual services of the Government are those which we distinguish from
special grants and from loan services. The difficulty is that we have got rid of the phraseology to which
15 we are accustomed, and instead of the words Appropriation Bill, we are using the word law.
Mr. ISAACS.-A difficulty arises in connexion with the honorable members proposal to place
expenditure incurred for bush fires in the ordinary, it would not be annual, and it would not be a
service.
END QUOTE
20
As such if a bushfire is not part of the annual Appropriation Bill, then how can the Victorian
Police justify any payments, even if as a reward, without any special Appropriation bill?
Is the Victorian Police and perhaps other Department having a gigantic cash holdings off the
books and they can use it for whatever they desire without any parliamentarian approval?
25
As I indicated people are contemplating suicide, murder and even mass-murder because they see
that for them as the best kind of solution. It is for this essential to consider why such a person
may end up contemplating this and executing this at times? What went wrong?
Why did a driver simply mow down innocent people without any regard for their human rights to
30 be safe on the streets?
It is that the blatant deception by politicians, and other authorities simply has created a disrespect
for Law and Order?
No doubt by his own admission Carl Williams was involved in murders but he in my view didnt
deserve to die because the courts had not sentenced him to death (not that I agree with a death
35 sentence). Now, in any future hostage event the person doing this will hardly trust authorities that
they will keep their word and in the process more innocent people might end up being killed.
Because over the decades I have been able to get an understanding what really drives people
wanting to commit suicide, murder and even mass-murder I am having this gigantic battle with
40 authorities including the courts to try to show they too comply with the Rule of Law as to be so
to say model citizens to which our youth of the day can take an example. We have however that
politicians robbing reportedly about $167,000.00 are not prosecutors before a court of law but
innocent pensions who were in error overpaid to which they had no contribution nevertheless are
so to say hauled over hot ashes and made to repay.
45 This coroner can have the inquest and make a statement of finding and the politicians more than
likely will use it to yet again provide further draconic legislation while they actually were the
culprit by blatantly ignoring my various specific warnings. So, they will so to say be left of the
hook and this will likely incense others, and by this matters will only get worse!

Page 18
For the record the documentation reproduced above regarding George Williams were to my
understanding lawfully obtained, albeit without specific consent of the person who provided it I
will not disclose the source. This has always been my principle/modus operandi that I never
disclose identities without the consent of the relevant person. This is also why persons trust me
5 and know they can confine with me knowing I will not disclose their identity without their
consent and this in turn assisted me to show persons an alternative way to address matters than
what I understood they had contemplated.
Perhaps, had the Victorian Police this kind of trustworthiness with the general public then the
Bourke Street mass killings may never have eventuated, but who trust politicians, police, etc,
10 when they are often exposed as criminals themselves?
For the record I was sentenced by the Family Court of Australia to 21 days in imprisonment and
this the order was issued days before the hearing was completed (as such legally in valid), and
as such it was a gigantic set so to say to teach me a lesson for exposing the rot of the Family
Court of Australia. It didnt silence me, rather to the opposite I did set out to expose even more
15 rot. While in prison (14 days) I immediately was nicknamed The Professor, this because upon
my entrance into a cell I was able to assist a person to gain his rights the police so far had denied
him, as the magistrate acknowledged he had those rights, and ordered the police to provide for
them, and various inmates made known their lawyer never had told them what I showed them in
the law reports to be applicable. Yes I had my law reports, at least some of them, with me. Prison
20 guards once so to say searched my cell and then ripped apart my law reports, etc, I have written
about this in my published books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series and explained how this
search was a set up, but I was forewarned by prisoners that they overheard that prison guards
would teach me a lesson in the evening. When the guards did come I informed them I had earlier
in the day been seen by the doctor that I didnt have any injuries, etc, and well ripping up law
25 books was the way they then expressed their sheer frustration. The next morning I was warned
by prison officers that when I came back from court they would make me pay (for whatever) but
I never returned, as despite the chief Justice claiming I still had to serve a week, the (Prison)
Governor agreed with me that I had served my time with remissions counted. Some prisoners
gave me the understanding they were conned to plea guilty, in plea bargaining, as to allegedly
30 get better off then to plea not guilty and possibly still be convicted. Actually, I was warned the
prison guards may try to get me out in a wooden box feet first because I dared to hold them
accountable to the prison regulations. I was given the understanding that some so called suicides
was nothing less than prisoners murdered by the prison guards. Considering my personal
experiences, and not knowing what really eventuated with the murder of Carl Williams but also
35 from what I understand of other prisoners, it may have been that the murder of Carl Williams
was a setup where prison guards deliberately were not in attendance to check, so that the murder
can proceed. In my view no one in his right mind can accept that a coroner will not investigate
such murder within prison facilities. If there is a failure to hold an independent/impartial
coroners inquest then in future incidents innocent people may die because the one holding
40 hostages may not trust authorities.
A copy of this Submission supplement 14 will be published on my blog at
www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati,
45 This part submission is not intended and neither must be perceived to set out all issues.
Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Friends call me Gerrit)
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL
(Our name is our motto!)


20170528-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION To Coroner Sara Hinchey J-Supplement 14

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

20170528-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION To Coroner Sara Hinchey J-Supplement 14

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Page 1

Coroner Sara Hinchey J 28-5-2017

10 Ref: 20170528-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION to Coroner Sara Hinchey J-Supplement 14

Page 1 28-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

'Vicious' Monis to blame for siege: Coroner - Sky News

Page 2 28-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

And then consider also the following:

Page 3 28-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

QUOTE 20170501-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION to Coroner Sara Hinchey J-Supplement 9

Hansard- 1898 index to subjects

Hansard 11-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

15 Mr. GORDON (South Australia).-I beg to move-

[start page 692]

Page 7 28-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

10 The amendment was withdrawn.

Amendment suggested by the Legislative Council of Victoria-

Mr. BARTON.-The state should be entitled to demand protection.

The amendment was negatived.

Clause 112 was agreed to.

30 Hansard index 1891

(IMAGE NOT INCLUDED)

Poisoning children to protect profits

10 Publication: Med. Sci. Monit. 2004 Mar ;10(3)::PI33-9.

Publication Date: 2004 Mar

Study Author(s): Geier, David A;Geier, Mark R;

Mercury and autism: accelerating evidence?

Publication: Neuro Endocrinol. Lett. 2005 Oct ;26(5)::439-46.

30 Publication Date: 2005 Oct

Study Author(s): Mutter, Joachim;Naumann, Johannes;Schneider, Rainer;Walach, Harald;Haley, Boyd;

Page 11 28-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Publication: Med. Hypotheses 2001 Apr ;56(4)::462-71.

Publication Date: 2001 Apr

5 Study Author(s): Bernard, S;Enayati, A;Redwood, L;Roger, H;Binstock, T;

Institution: ARC Research, Cranford, New Jersey 07901, USA

Autism is a syndrome characterized by impairments in social relatedness and communication, repetitive

Research quotes on mercury, Thimerosal, vaccines and autism

Page 13 28-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Mr. MCMILLAN.-Would it not into the Appropriation Bill?

Mr. ISAACS.-Yes; but not as an annual service.

Page 17 28-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL

(Our name is our motto!)

Potrebbero piacerti anche