ER1 DOC 3

To the Interim Applications judges of the Chancery Division, QBD and Administrative
Court

Cc Respondents in the Supreme Court Application

Dear Judges and Experts,

AN APPLICATION TO HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN AND TO PARLIAMENT TO

IMPEACH LORD PHILLPS OF WORTH MATRAVERS, LORD JUSTICE
BRIGGS, LORD JUSTICE HENDERSON AND SIR TERENCE ETHERTON,
MASTER OF THE ROLLS, FOR CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT AN IDENTITY THEFT
IN A CONVEYANCING TRANSACTION, AND TO STEAL THE TITLE TO 37-47
STOKE NEWINGTON ROAD LONDON N16 8BJ (THE RED RIVER
CONVEYANCING AND MORTGAGE FRAUD).

APPLICATION FOR A DECLARATION OF NULLITY OF BRIGGS FRAUDULENT

INSTRUMENT

A. INTRODUCTION

This is sent by Miss Anal Sheikh, Solicitor of the Senior Courts (1988-2008) and a
former conveyancing practitioner of 20 years standing.

The Experts are the people listed in the attached excel spreadsheet. They number over
1000 barristers, solicitors, journalists and others. The Experts include members of the
Property Bar Association , the Chancery Bar Association , COMBAR, the Criminal Bar
Association , the Civil Rules Committee, the Land Registration Rules Committee, and the
Conveyancing Committee of the Law Society.

The Experts are asked to advise the interim applications list judges of the Chancery
Division, the QBD and the Administrative Court in relation to a certain instrument, namely
Briggs Fraudulent Instrument appearing at ER1 PAGE 112-PAGE 115. The
instrument is probably ab initio void and unlawful for over 1000 reasons. I stopped
counting at 200. Some of the reasons are set out in the Schedule below.

Briggs Fraudulent Instrument is the vehicle of the most preposterous fraud in the
history of conveyancing. Every conveyancing practitioner (and contract lawyer) would
agree with me that it presents the greatest risk ever known in the history of the civilized
world. That is not a statement of hyperbole.

The issue before the court is apparently whether Briggs Fraudulent Instrument should
be declared a nullity. The problem is that if it falls away, the entire Red River

1
Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud which concerns the theft of a 100 unit development
will also fall away. A number of very powerful and very important prison will also face
criminal charges.

This has also been sent to every member of the judiciary in England and Wales to ask
them if they will support an application to Her Majesty the Queen and to Parliament to
impeach the four judges named above.

The documents in this case are

1) The material facts and grounds are set out in the document marked ER1,
a truncated version is sent in PDF form. The complete version of
ER1 can be viewed in the following link

https://www.dropbox.com/s/pbrpoegdapk7x0z/ER1%20Application%20to%
20impeach%20Briggs.pdf?dl=0

2) The Supreme Court Application

B. THE RED RIVER CONVEYANCING AND MORTGAGE FRAUD

Lord Phillips of Matravers, a former Lord Chief Justice, (Phillips) Lord Justice
Briggs (Briggs) and Lord Justice Henderson, tortured and unlawfully killed a sick,
disabled, and elderly woman, or have permitted or acquiesced in her torture
and killing. Their victim was Mrs. Rabia Sheikh. She died on 2nd April 2017, aged 89.

Mrs. Sheikhs suffering and death was consequent upon the judges theft of her title to
a valuable development site at 37-47 Stoke Newington Road London N16 (the Stoke
Newington Site) which they have now developed into 100 residential units and 6
commercial units, yielding a net development profit of about 64m to share between
themselves. ER 1 PAGE 5.

The Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud is described as an identity theft in
which Briggs and the other Red River Conspirators stole the title and interest of a
conveyancing client and the role and function of conveyancing solicitor, and disposed of
the title to the property on their own terms. What Briggs did is conveyed in the images
at ER 1 PAGE 9.

The Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud concerns a routine

conveyancing transaction, one of the hundreds of thousands which are completed in
solicitors offices up and down the country every day. The particular stage of the
conveyancing process at which the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud took
place is within a single moment in time after legal completion and during the course of
the registration of the disposition, protected by certificate issued under s.72 Land
Registration Act 2002 (Priority Protection) , when the register is frozen

On 2nd October 2007 and 5th October 2007,

1) Lord Justice Briggs

2) Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers

2
 3) Lord Justice Henderson

4) The Law Society of England and Wales (who had discovered the Sheikhs interest
in the Stoke Newington Site in Anal Sheikh v The Law Society [2005] EWHC 1409
(Ch) )

5) The General Council of the Bar

6) Hugo Page QC , a barrister and member of Blackstone Chambers (Page)

7) Nigel Meares, a barrister and member of the chambers formerly 11 Stone

Buildings (Meares)

8) Tom Smith QC, a barrister, and member of 2 New Square Chambers (Smith)

9) Lexa Hilliard QC barrister, and member of 2 New Square Chambers and then of
11 Stone Buildings (Hilliard)

10) Daniel Schaffer of Isadore Goldman, a Deputy Bankruptcy Registrar and the
solicitor to the Law Society of England and Wales (Schaffer)

11) Burges Salmon, solicitors . A senior partner of Burges Salmon is on the Board of
the Solicitors Regulation Authority, the regulatory arm of the Law Society

12) The Bank of Ireland

(the Red River Conspirators) entered into a conspiracy to commit the Red River
Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud as an identity theft

The identity theft took place in the following way

1) Philips gave the Red River Conspirators access to empty courtrooms in

summer vacation when the Royal Courts of Justice are closed on the following
days EC UN CORE PAGE 240 PAGE 241 ,

Wednesday 26th August 2007

Monday 3R September 2007
Friday 7 September 2007
Thursday 20th September 2007
Monday 25th September 2007
Thursday 27th September 2007
Tuesday 2nd October 2007
Friday 5th October 2007

2) Briggs impersonated a judge and staged enactments of trials. He put on

his judicial robes and wig, used the empty courtrooms and bribed court to
stand around to pretend that a hearing was taking place, which it was not.

3
 3) Briggs stole my role and function to discharge the functions of a
conveyancing solicitor e.g. the making and removal of applications to the land
registry, the drafting of undertakings .

4) Barristers, Hugo Page QC and Nigel Meares stole Mrs Sheikhs interest and
title which was that of a lender, so that everything Briggs did could be done
with apparent consent, just as a conveyancing client would consent to
the steps taken by his conveyancing solicitor

5) Barristers Tom Smith QC and Lexa Hilliard QC stole the interest and title of
the borrower to enable them to make purported applications to court in the
name of a borrower, which a borrower cannot possibly make

6) Briggs also stole the identity of a judge

Unbeknown to Mrs Sheikh , the conveyancing client, who ten years later still did not
know what he did, Briggs

1) removed the conduct of the conveyancing processes from the

conveyancing solicitor , and undertook the conveyancing processes
himself
2) colluded with barristers who had usurped, or stolen, the title and
interest of the seller or borrower [1]
3) colluded with barristers who had usurped, or stolen, the title and
interest of the buyer or lender
4) removed the application to register a completed disposition
5) undid the conveyancing transaction
6) created at least 19 contracts which did not exist (including undertakings)
7) disregarded contracts which did exist
8) ordered the conveyancing client to be bound to the contracts he had
created ,
9) ordered the conveyancing solicitor to be to be bound to the contracts he
had created
10) ordered other parties (in their absence and without their knowledge) to
be to be bound to the contracts he had created
11) recompleted the disposition on his own terms, making it a composite
transaction

The Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud shows that what is impossible can be
done if
1) one fraudster is a High Court Judge (Briggs)

2) a second fraudster is a solicitor , adviser to the Law Society and a

member of the judiciary (Schaffer) and

3) a third fraudster is connected with the Law Society (Burges Salmon)

4
C. THE APPLICATION BEFORE THE INTERIM APPLICATIONS LIST JUDGES

At ER1 PAGE 31-PAGE 34 I show the unsuccessful attempts made over the last 10 years
to obtain a domestic remedy ; and that is only a fraction of what has been done.

A few days ago, I wrote to Lord Neuberger and each of Supreme Court Judges saying

A land lawyer of Lord Neubergers pre-eminence would be able to declare

the vehicle of the fraud, Briggs Fraudulent Instrument , a nullity within a
millisecond of reading it; Lord Neuberger would also understand why he
should take no more than a millisecond to declare it a nullity (that being the
time it took to fraudulently alter the register using Briggs Fraudulent
Instrument)

Unfortunately, he doesnt appear to be willing to do that.

I recently wrote to Sir Colin Rimer who was deceived into providing access to the court in
summer vacation. I suspect that Smith and Schaffer must have told him this was a child
abduction case, or a terrorist threat, which are two grounds for making applications for urgent
substantive hearings (when there are no proceedings ) in summer vacation
Sir Colin has however asked me to go back to the High Court, which I now do.
The court is now putting the matter before a lawyer.
As I have said, the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud is a fraud of legal genius,
and as the 10 years have shown , it is beyond the capacity of even experts to understand it.
Anthony Spaeight QC who has managed to procedure four ( fraudulent) CROs told me
outside court
I know nothing about contract law

Of course , it would save everyones time if Briggs, Phillips , Henderson and other Red River
Conspirators would simply admit they got very badly wrong this time.
This is copied to all of them .

D. CONCLUSION

I can assure the Court that it will not hear from a single one of the Experts . There is
culture of fear in the UK. A veteran MP who knows about the fraud has said
Parliament knows about the judges,
but we are too terrified to do anything about it

Many recipients will be too frightened to respond; some will be indifferent; some will not
wish to dignify such a monumentally stupid fraud, some still will not respond with the
promise of remuneration.

5
In the absence of receiving any argument from anyone that I am wrong , the Court is
asked give the remedies set out in ER1 PAGE 93-PAGE 95 and in the draft order in the
Supreme Court Application.

Finally, I am asking the court to deal with all of this on paper and without the need for any
attendance at a hearing. There are three principle reasons:

1) Conveyancing is administrative process undertaken by solicitors in their offices,

not in courtroom. The Red River Conspirators have made it justiciable to commit
their fraud. If face to face clarification is needed , it should be at a meeting with
a judge within some sort of disciplinary procedure, not a hearing

2) If there is a hearing, there must be something in dispute. It must be in dispute

that a judge can make up contracts which do not exist and do all the other thing
Briggs did. How can these things be in dispute?

3) The Victim in this type of case risks arrest on fraudulent charges of contempt of
court and being dragged into the cells from the very courtroom while he is
making submissions to the judge. I am not willing to take that risk.

The court office has asked for the case number. There are no proceedings in which Briggs
Fraudulent Instrument could have been made. The conspirators have used the number of
other purported cases , one of which is HC07C02257

Yours sincerely

Anal Sheikh

SCHEDULE
LAND REGISTRATION ACT 2002 s 72 (PRIORITY PROTECTION) ERI PAGE
56-PAGE 64

1. Does Briggs Fraudulent Instrument make the following possible

1) A seller could sell his property for , say 500,000. 00 , one thousand times over.
After each buyer has completed his purchase by transmitting purchase monies,
and lodges his application to register the transfer of the title to him during his
priority period , the seller could write to the Land Registry cancelling the
application for registration . At the same time he could apply for a Briggs type
order permanently injuncting the buyer from making applications to the Land
Registry . The seller would be able to give an undertaking to each successive
buyer to procure the removal of a previous buyers application and the
cancellation of the buyers priority search . Over the course of time , the seller
would received proceeds of 500 m.

2) A foreign State or terrorist organisation could buy thousands of properties and

sell them ten thousand times over. They could pay a single judge to print orders
in the terms of the Briggs Fraudulent Instrument , without even a hearing. A
financial analyst would be able to calculate the duration of time over which the

6
 entire capital base of the UK is transferred overseas or into the control of the
terrorist organisation.

3) As the Land Registry does not recognise the Law of Property ( Miscellaneous
Provisions ) Act 1984, any disposition of land in the UK can now be based on a
combination of two or more documents an informal written or oral promise,
extracts taken from different documents , offers to treat, an expressed interest in
property , an alcohol fuelled reckless promise made over dinner to transact in
land written on the back of a paper serviette

4) Briggs Fraudulent Instrument had the effect of removing an application for the
registration of a completed transaction , which was in the course of registration :
it interfered with a right in rem. If it could do that , what is to prevent such an
order from removing the rights in rem of an owner who has already completed
the registration of his interest , perhaps years before ?

5) If by Briggs Fraudulent Instrument a judge can remove a title which is registered,

and if a judge can make up contracts (which apparently he can) what is to prevent
such a judge from removing the record of any and every purchase or mortgage in
the UK and from reconstructing the transaction on his own terms as Briggs did in
the Red River fraud , reducing every right in rem to a chose in action ? .

6) If (5) is possible , is it theoretically possible for a single dishonest judge and

single dishonest Land Registrar (or for that matter, hypothetically, ,the Lord Chief
Justice and the Chief Land Registrar ) to transfer the UKs entire net property asset
base to an international terrorist organisation, a foreign power, friends and family
or to themselves . They could

a) remove all pending applications for registration as Briggs did , or remove

registered titles overnight , without notice,
b) create their own contracts as Briggs did whereby the real owner rights are
extinguished ,
c) discharge mortgages or liens,
d) procure the registration of title to the foreign power etc ( the execution of the
transfer documents should not present an obstacle. In the Red River fraud
, Briggs and Deputy Registrar Schaffer overcame this problem by the
Fabricated Order)
e) leave the real owner to claim damages.

If they were to personally receive a 1% commission on net transfers, what sum

would they receive?

2. For so long as Briggs Fraudulent Instrument remains good law , is every registered
title in England and Wales at risk of being stolen by a judge after legal completion
and before actual registration, notwithstanding the provisions of Land Registration
Act 2002 s 72 (Priority Protection)

3. Can any judge in England and Wales steal a registered titles while a completed
disposition, which is protected by a priority period search certificate, is in the course
of being registered (as Briggs did in the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud)
or it is only Briggs who has that prerogative?

7
4. In theory, can a single judge (interim applications list judge) (man masquerading
or impersonating a judge ) steal all the registered titles in England and Wales ?

5. Is the title to the Crown Estate, where the title is registered, equally at risk?

6. The provisional seasonally adjusted UK property transaction count for February 2017
was 103,910 residential transactions and 11,640 non-residential transactions ( say an
estimated of 1,500,000 residential transactions every year)
Briggs Fraudulent Instrument is made in Mrs Sheikhs case and therefore could and
should be made the case of every single purchase .
Extrapolating from the statistics for residential transactions alone

5000 people will be displaced in the UK every day. The temperatures in winter
can fall to low as -5 degrees at night . I wrote to Lord Judge about these
matters in 2010. How many people will have died in the time it took for Lord
Judge to have read my letter? How many people will have died in the time it
took for Lord Judge to have opened the envelope ?

100,000 people will be displaced in the UK in a month

1.5 million people will be displaced in the UK in a year

15 million people will be displaced in the UK over 10 years Briggs Fraudulent

Instrument was made 10 years ago According to the United Nations High
Commissioner for Refugees. (UNHCR), 4.8 million have fled to Turkey, Lebanon,
Jordan, Egypt and Iraq, and 6.6 million are internally displaced within Syria

World War II was the deadliest military conflict in history in absolute terms of
total casualties. Over 60 million people were killed in ten years . There were
450,900 UK deaths.
Of the 15 million, let us say 75% die in the streets, through cold or other mental
or physical suffering. That is 11.25 million deaths in the UK over 10 years.

In Medieval England, the Black Death was to kill 1.5 million people out of an
estimated total of 4 million people between 1348 and 1350. Had the plague
continued, the entire population of Britain would have been extinguished by
1352.

1) Does Briggs Fraudulent Instrument present the greatest threat ever known to
Britain, since its habitation by modern humans 30,000 years ago , certainly
greater than any act of terrorism on British soil in recent history ?

2) Faced with Briggs Fraudulent Instrment, a buyer and his family will lose
everything they own in a single moment of time; they will face a complete
reversal of fortune in a single day; the majority will find themselves homeless,
compelled to live in temporary accommodation or in the back of their car;
they will soon lose their employment; their children may be removed from their
care; marriages will break down; they have no hope of recovering their wealth
and position.

8
 3) In a jurisdiction in which assisted suicide is unlawful, would the instant, and
probably painless release, guaranteed by a terrorists bullet or bomb be
desirable?

CONVEYANCING AND CIVIL PROCEDURE ER1 PAGE 64- PAGE 71

7. Is it accurate to say that Briggs impersonated a judge and stage enactments of

trials, put on his judicial robes and wig, used empty courtrooms and bribed court
staff to stand around to create the false appearance that a judicial process of some
sort was being conducted.

8. A conveyancer requires training , skill and a licence to practice. A surgeon requires

training, skill and a licence to practice. If an interim applications list judge can do
conveyancing in the courtroom, can he also do open heart surgery ? Can the judge
kill the patient and say if you have suffered loss, you can appeal

9. The cost of conveyancing in the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud would
have been about 500.00 in which the application for registration cost about 25.00
(twenty five pounds) in a solicitors office. I have estimated the cost to the taxpayer
of the 9 hearings which took place in September and October 2007 in the Red River
fraud was 100,000.00. The entire cost of all 200 hearings is to the taxpayer is
about 10m .The Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud is only one fraud
committed in the civil justice system. I estimate that the cost of all of the sham
proceedings taken over a 10 year period is 100,108.45 billion.. That money could
be used for schools, hospitals, legal aid and for other social welfare. Are the judiciary
stealing from the public purse?

10. A typical conveyancing file will consist of contracts, statements, invoices, search results
and the like. What was Red River UK Ltd & Anor v Sheikh & Anor [2007] EWHC 2654
(Ch) doing on my conveyancing file? That and other related judgments are published
on BAILII . Briggs made them up to facilitate the fraud. They do not exist. They are
fraudulent instruments. How many other published judgments are false and fraudulent
? EC UN CORE PAGE 285-305 discusses BAILIIs role in serious organised fraud and
their publication and dissemination of fraudulent judgments
THE DOCTRINE OF FREEDOM OF CONTRACT ER1 PAGE 71- PAGE 77

11. The right to contract is one of those fundamental rights in our society that is frequently
lauded and rightly receives primary credit for the establishment of a functional, market-
based economy in which predictability is prized. This right is so ingrained that
whenever we do hear about infringement of the right to contract, it is usually historical,
such as limitations on women's right to contract prior to the nineteenth and twentieth
centuries5 or the rights of slaves or indentured servants preceding the twentieth
century Given the prevalence of contract in modern society, it is difficult to imagine
how anyone could live without that right Volume 16 Issue 1 Yale Human Rights and
Development Journal David Weber
The doctrine of the freedom of Contract has existed in the worlds most ancient
civilizations such as Egypt, Ancient Greece and Mesopotamia since the birth of time for
all members of society with the exception of two groups, slaves and in some societies
, women.
1) Does the UK no longer recognise the doctrine of freedom of contract ?

9
 2) Does Briggs Fraudulent Instrument legitimize slavery in the UK ?

3) Have womens rights been set back by 10,000 years by Briggs Fraudulent
Instrument ?

4) Ten years after the event, the Lender still does not know

a) that contracts to which she is treated as being a party were made up

behind her back

b) that she has been found to have breached obligations in those contracts
(of which she has no knowledge)

c) that she has had to pay damages for the breach of obligations in those
contracts (of which she has no knowledge)

d) that those damages have been set off against all her assets
resulting in her losing every penny piece she earned in 50 years. How do
any of us (judges included) know the same thing is not happening to us,
even as this is being read?

5) The Attorney General writes that Briggs should be reported to the police

Obviously, the Attorney General believes that it is possible for judges to make up
contracts etc.

There are 84,600 seconds in each day. Assuming that a million contracts are made
in the UK every second of every day , 84.6 billion contracts are made every day
which a judge could remake, disregard or alter.

How are the police going to deal with the 84.6 billion complainants every single
day complaining that a judge has interfered with their contracts ?

If Briggs did not understand basic contract law, why should there be any
expectation that the police will be able to do so? What if the police cant see
anything wrong ?

MORTAGE LAW ER1 PAGE 77- PAGE 80

12. The mortgage dates back to Anglo-Saxon England . The UK mortgage market is
worth 1.3 trillion, representative of 11.1 million mortgages, and is the largest in
Europe in terms of amount lent per year and the total value of outstanding
loans. Council of Mortgage Lenders

1) In the 21st century, in a single afternoon, Briggs disapplied , or changed mortgage

law which has evolved over 16 centuries , or made his own mortgage law

2) Does the mortgage, in the terms in which is it traditionally understood no

longer exist in the UK ?

10
 3) Should banks and others lenders be told before they lend any more money ?

4) Should all borrowers be told that Briggs has established the precedent that if
a bank or other lending institution or private lender (the Lender) prevents
a borrower from committing a fraud against the Lender, the borrower has
an automatic right to a claim for damages equivalent to the sum the
borrower would have acquired, had his attempted fraud not been obstructed
, and that that sum can immediately be set off against his loan or mortgage
, leaving him debt free viz a viz the Lender ?
CORPORATE INSOLVENCY LAW AND THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES ER1
PAGE 81

13. The history of corporate insolvency law in the UK began with the first modern
companies legislation in 1844. However, many principles of insolvency are rooted in
bankruptcy laws that trace back to ancient times. Regulation of bankruptcy was a
necessary part of every legal system, and is found in the Hammurabi Code (2250 BC),
the Twelve Tables of the Roman Republic (450 BC), the Talmud (200 AD), and the
Corpus Juris Civilis (534 AD).[5] Ancient laws used a variety of methods for distributing
losses among creditors, and satisfaction of debts usually came from a debtor's own
body. A debtor might be imprisoned, enslaved or killed or all three

1) Was Briggs a judge at the 2pm hearing on 5th October 2007, or was he again
masquerading as a judge? There was no issued claim and no issued iapplication;
and he was not the interim applications list judge.

2) Can a Chancery judge strike out a winding up petition [based on an admitted and
evidenced debt] [ within an hour of service] [without a claim or application made
by the debtor ] [on his own initiative]

3) The 10 wealthiest UK companies have a market capitalisation in excess of 0.7

trillion. If [a judge] [an interim applications judge ] [a man pretending to be a
judge ] in England and Wales has the power

a) to give certain companies absolute immunity from liquidation

b) to prevent creditors from enforcing debts against certain companies

can he acquire wealth and power greater than any man in antiquity, or in modern
times, in a single hour on the back of a single sheet of paper?
THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES ER1 PAGE 82-PAGE 83

14. Lord Woolf is a Member of Blackstone Chambers. He was the driving force behind the
Woolf Reforms which resulted in the introduction of the Civil Procedure Rules .These are
the questions which should be considered:

1) Is there any coincidence between the fact that Hugo Page QC was involved in
the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud? Has Lord Woolf drafted the Civil
Procedure Rules to enable the Members of Blackstone to steal from members of
the public using the courts

2) How has it come about that the Civil Procedure Rules permitted the Red River
Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud to take place

11
3) How has it come about that proceedings which do not legally exist (no claim form,
no jurisdiction , impersonation of a judge etc) can take place under the Civil
Procedure Rules

4) How has it come about that under the Civil Procedure Rules a member of the
judiciary (Master Bard to name one) can refuse to give judgments in default for
5 years leaving him open to suspicion that he (and other judges to whom he is
accountable (Lord Thomas, Lord Leveson, Lady Hallett, Lord Etherton) has
pocketed the money which in the case in question is a sum of 8m- 64m

5) How has it has come about that under the Civil Procedure Rules the court can
remove judgments in default after they have been entered (Beaumont)

6) How has it come about that under the Civil Procedure Rules the court can pick
and chose which cases it will issue or hear and which it will not

7) How has it come about that under the Civil Procedure Rules the court can
assign every case concerning a certain individual or family to one judge at the
very start of the case(s)

8) How has it come about that under the Civil Procedure Rules it is possible for
the court to deprive members of the public from the right to use the court for
years on end, on pain of the threat of imprisonment if they attempt it

9) How has it come about that under the Civil Procedure Rules it is possible for a
man to impersonate a judge in the Court of Appeal (Briggs, , Henderson , Rimer ,
Chadwick and Richards LJ)

11) How has it come about that under the Civil Procedure Rules it is possible for
the a judgment to be generated and published when there are no proceedings
in which it could be made

12) How has it been possible under the Civil Procedure Rules for 50 hearings to
have taken place in the High Court and in the Court of Appeal in the Red River
Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud in which the Sheikh Shares, the Sheikh
Restriction, the Sheikh Unilateral Notice and the Sheikh Charge disappeared
leaving Mrs Sheikh penniless

a) when there is no issued claim form

b) in Mrs Sheikhs absence, without her knowledge, without service on her

of any proceedings or documents, without her being represented by
anyone

c) in case in which all she knows is that she paid 500.00 to a solicitor to
complete a routine conveyancing transaction

13) Should all conveyancing solicitors be told that conveyancing can now be done
form the Bench ?

12
 14) Should all conveyancing clients be told that conveyancing can now be done
form the Bench ?

CRIMINAL LAW ER1 PAGE 84-PAGE 88

15. By Briggs Fraudulent Instrument Briggs committed criminal acts from the Bench. By
the Fabricated Order, barrister, Nigel Meares, consented on behalf of the victims to
the committing of criminal acts against them

The criminalising of the conveying of land by other than solicitors and licensed
conveyancers means that the Red River Conspirators are automatically guilty of the
following offences (to name a few):

Land Registration Act 2002

s123 (suppression of information )
s124 (improper alteration)

Law of Property Act 1925

s 183 (fraudulent concealment)

The Solicitors Act 1974

s22 (conveyancing other than by a solicitor)

Public Bodies Corrupt Practices Act 1889

s.1 (Corruption in public office)

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

s.327 ( Concealing criminal property )
s.328 ( Involvement in arrangements facilitating the acquisition, retention,
use or control of criminal property)
s.329 (Acquisition, use or possession of criminal property )
s.330 (Failure to disclose knowledge or suspicion of money laundering:
regulated sector

Theft Act 1968) 1968

s.1 (Theft)
S 17, False Accounting(making false entry) (omission of material
particular) (furnishing false information)
s.15 ( Obtaining property by deception )
s.20(2) Procuring the execution of a valuable security by deception
s.22 Handling stolen goods (receiving, undertaking or assisting the
retention etc.

Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981

s.1 (Forgery)
s.2 (Copying false instrument with intent)
s.3 ( Using a false instrument)
13
 s.4 (Using a copy of a false instrument)
s.5 (Custody or control of false instruments etc.)
s.175 ( Making, custody or control of counterfeiting materials etc.

The Fraud Act 2006

s. 2 ( fraud by false representation )
s.3 ( failure to disclose information )
s 4 ( fraud by abuse of position )
s 6 ( possession of articles for fraud )
s 7 (making of articles used for fraud )

Common Law Offences

Conspiracy to defraud
Perverting the course of justice
Fabrication of evidence with a view to misleading a tribunal

1) If Briggs could commit criminal acts from the Bench , does it follow that

a) a judge in England and Wales can order a bus full of people to be blown up

b) a judge in England and Wales can order the torture of child

c) a judge in England and Wales can order the rape of a woman

d) a judge in England and Wales can order a group of people to be murdered

e) a judge in England and Wales can order the genocide of a nation.

2) Can a judge can do all of the aforegoing in the interim applications list of the
Chancery Division of the High Court during summer vacation when the courts are
closed.

3) Does the Fabricated Order mean that

a) a barrister instructed by a client

b) any barrister , whether or not he is instructed

c) any person, whether a barrister or not

can consent on behalf of any other person, who is victim of crime

[without that persons authority or knowledge ] to the committing of
criminal acts against him, so for example, as Nigel Meares did, a barrister
could say

There has been no rape, murder, or act of terrorism. Look, here is

the consent order I endorsed saying that the victim consented to
being raped/ murdered/ blown up

14
 4) If so, will the prison authorities release every single convicted prisoner in
England and Wales as soon as a barrister is found willing to give the relevant
consent on behalf the victims

5) If the person consenting does not have to be a barristers, can I consent today ,
and can every prisoner be released tomorrow?

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ER1 PAGE 89

16. By Briggs Fraudulent Instrument

Briggs permanently injuncted a lender who had lent 1.2m to a borrower, as

well as the lenders solicitor, from making any application to the Land Registry
to the Land Registry

Briggs permanently injuncted a lender from retaining any other solicitor to make
an application to the Land Registry on her behalf

Briggs permanently injuncted the lenders solicitor from retaining another

solicitor to make an application to the Land Registry on her behalf

Briggs in effect, permantently prevented every solicitor in the world from acting
for the lender or the lenders solicitor

Briggs prevented the Lender from employing her own solicitor but appointed a
solicitor of his choice to act for her, Burges Salmon

Briggs held a client of a solicitor responsible for the solicitors actions (the service
of the winding up petition)

Briggs held the mother of a solicitor responsible for the solicitors actions (the
service of the winding up petition)

1) Would the Judges accept that the precedents Briggs established means that UK
is probably one of two countries in the world (North Korea being the other )
which

a) does not recognise the role and function of a lawyer

b) believe that members of a mans family should pay for his wrongdoing
2) Would they also accept that it is now also the case that

a) In an application for ancillary relief the judge can order the Husbands
solicitor as well as the Husband to pay maintenance to the Wife

15
 b) Ms Dinah Rose QC, who represented Mr Julian Assange in his extradition
case should be extradited to Sweden to face charges of rape

c) Mr Alun Jones QC, who represented Mr Abu Hamza , should be extradited

to the USA to face charges of terrorism

d) Mr Nicholas Bowen QC, who recently represented the Yorkshire Ripper Peter
Sutcliffe in his latest application to the High Court, should also be committed
for the rest of his life in Broadmoor Hospital.

e) The mothers of divorce lawyers should also be ordered to pay maintenance

to the spouses of their childrens divorce clients

f) Dinah Rose QCs mother should also be extradited to Sweden to face charge
of rape

g) Alun Jones QCs mother should be extradited to the USA to face charges of
terrorism

h) Nicholas Bowen QCs mother, should also be committed for the rest of her
life in Broadmoor Hospital.

3) Should Law Societies and Bar Councils worldwide be permitted to intervene

MISCELLANEOUS ER1 PAGE 91-PAGE 92

Trade

17. Conveyancing is based on principles of trade and exchange which have existed since
trade began millennia ago. Briggs Fraudulent Instrument establishes a precedent
that after a Customer has handed the Shopkeeper money for a loaf of bread, the
Shopkeeper can make an application in the interim applications list to a High Court
Judge without notifying the Customer and can obtain an order from the High Court
Judge

a) ordering the Customer to hand back bread to the Shopkeeper and trust him to
keep it in tact (viz. the Sheikh Charge)

b) enabling the Shopkeeper to retain the Customers money and use it if he wants
(viz. the 1.2m secured by the Sheikh Charge)

c) enabling the Shopkeeper keep the receipt for the bread (viz. the Sheikh Charge
in which a borrower acknowledges receipt )

d) providing if the High Court Judge got it all wrong the Customer could make a
claim against the Shopkeeper

e) providing that if the Customer disobeys his order he will be committed to prison
for contempt

16
18. In the space of 10 minutes, Briggs converted a Debtor indebted to his Secured
Creditor for 1.2m into his Secured Creditors creditor indebted to him for 6m;
and vice versa. If a judge can do that he can wipe out World Debt

Administration

19. The Land Register is a public record. Briggs has established a precedent in England
and Wales that a person (as well has his solicitor or any solicitor in the world whom
he wishes to instruct) can be permanently injuncted by a High Court Judge at an
interim application without notice from making any application whatsoever to HMLR .
Therefore people can be permanently injuncted from appearing on

The Register of Births, Deaths and Marriages

Electoral registers
Passport and Citizenship registers
DVLC registers
Registers entitlement people to receive Social Security
Registers entitlement people to receive their pension
Patent registers
Company registers
Shipping registers
Professional registers
School registers
Club memberships

Moreover they would never know it because they would never be notified that the
judge had done that or served with any order

Philosophical and Existential

If a judge in England and Wales can make up a contract which does not exist, find
that a person is bound by the contract he has made up , find that a person is in breach
of the contract he has made up to which he has bound that person , find that the
person is liable to pay damages for the breach he has made up of the contract he has
made up, to which he has bound that person, can extinguish the persons actual interest
in property by way of set off against damages for the breach he has made up of the
contract he has made up (which is what Briggs J did) an asset which exists can be
extinguished by a debt which does not exist.

20. Does the UK have the right to deprive citizens of the right to exist

17