THE CULMINATING STATISTICAL INQUIRY PEER REVIEW & FEEDBACK FORM Author: ¢ i Peer Reviewer: |) \/) en { Eurnica Kim 19h 9 Thy ek Project Topic/Title: Of aonic ¢s_J\ ct Criteria Checklist: Project states a complex inquiry that requires more research to examine than previous projects. Comments: / [Pfoject creates a well-written abstract and makes it presentable on the cover page. ‘Comments: J TF roject displays data collection process and clearly identifies proof that the data was collected. | Comments: Pre Prdject generates an experiment and clearly identifies the experimental design setup. If the fect is a study, clearly indicate that to the author at this time and why it is a study. ‘Comments: [1 Project exhibits the collection/proof of a random sample of an appropriate number of subjects. Comments: | [Project includes a revision to the original inquiry pitch addressing the written feedback, | Comments: Project presents a sense of professionalism and satisfies all required formatting criteria. Comments: / Project validates the credibility of its information by citing sources and survey participants. Comments:READ THE BULK OF THE REPOR ECORD YOUR COMMENTS BELow: ‘WARM FeepBack: COOL FEEDBACK: (WHAT Works WELL?) | (WHAT NEEDS IMPROVING?) a RESEARCH: | INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND RESEARCH: area dy nk Tae fc x Th Phan trolk Geog Ving iS mR We dpe no try lang A UR Eehente ee | ve (ile The SX Vow] Eta ane Whele U WE) \ q ) DATA COLLECTION & ANALYS'S: DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS: \ | ‘Yu ta Ce VUE 06. eth Twi) HEL 18 Set PIS wee Fhe meen Scaie § f\ nice “ tie \ ReGen cy © WNC b NONE) y MS vcgvetie,, Hs bei Yoko ti \ / \ (CONCLUSIONS/REFLECTIONS: (CONCLUSIONS/REFLECTIONS: | \ Aleeee wes) \ Gone : Abu int wma y fyvcles Opn Whe 7 COM omg} | BOGEN rh cespsh an a MOTE TA wy Mealy | UY 7 Sa eee By signing below, | certify that the project | reviewed is statistically sound and valid apart from the recommendations and comments that | provided above. —_—. 5 = (74 S-(74] Poor Reviewbrs Signature Date