Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Propulsion Systems
EXPERIMENT 2
Performance Characteristics of an Internal Combustion
Engine
IC
engines are very versatile. They come in all sizes producing powers from 40 000
kW to 0.2 kW. They are easily transported and the mainly liquid fuel that they
use is easily available, relatively cheap and easily transportable. They are
reliable. You can expect them to work for long hours with the same performance
and over and over again for years with proper maintenance. They are easy to
start and operate. Their transient characteristics (acceleration, deceleration) are
excellent. All in all, we can easily say that the IC engine has been the greatest
mechanical achievement of mankind, both socially and economically and it is
rapidly becoming mankind's foremost concern, ecologically.
iii. METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS
The following formulae were made available and were used to calculate the
correct break power, break thermal efficiency, excess air coefficient and
volumetric efficiency.
The corrected breaking power is done so that the all the measured value are
standardized to the atmospheric condition. This makes the comparison easy and
effective.
To calculate break power torque and engine speed was used;
N b=2 Tn
The corrected break power requires to calculate the correcting factor which
needs the dry atmospheric pressure, ambient pressure and the vapour pressure
and relative humidity which in our case was 90%.
7.5 T amb
n vap=
237.3+ T amb
0.65 0.5
T +273.15
(
Cb =
742.56
Pdry ) ( . amb
25+273.15 )
N bc =N b Cb
Once the corrected breaking power is calculated, the brake thermal efficiency is
calculated. The break thermal efficiency is ratio of power output delivered and
the energy given by the fuel for this power. The calculation is:
kJ
QL =44000
kg
N bc
nb =
Gf QL
After calculating the break thermal efficiency, the excess air coefficient is
calculated through actual air fuel ratio. As the name says it, the air fuel ratio is
the air and fuel mass flow rate. It is calculated value is:
A mair
( )F actual
=
Gf
The excess air is ratio of the actual air ratio to theoretical area ratio. The value of
theoretical air fuel ratio is given as 14.6 and is calculated as:
A
=
( F) actual
( FA )th
Finally the volumetric efficiency which is the ratio of the amount of air-fuel
mixture of the actual case compared with the theoretical case. First the
theoretical air flow rate is calculate through standard atmospheric temperature
as:
Pstd
std =
Rair T std
mth, ( 2jn ) i V
air = s std
After finding the theoretical mass flow rate, the volumetric efficiency was
calculated through:
mair
nv=
mth ,air
Sample calculation done for the 4th reading:
N b=2 Tn = 2 x x 45 x 58.13
N b=16.4 kW
N bc =N b Cb =16.4 kW x 1=16.4 kW
N bc 16.4
nb = = =0.19
G f Q L 16.4
x 44000
1000
101.3
A m 3600
( ) = air =
F actual Gf 1.95
=14.43
1000
A
=
( F) actual
=
14.43
=0.98
14.6
( FA ) th
Pstd 101.325 kg
std = = 1000=1.184 3
Rair T std 287.058298 m
mth,
air =( 2jn ) iV =( 2 x 58.13
s std
4 ) kg
x 4 x 0.00034 x 1.184=0.047 ( )
s
101.3
m 3600
n v = air = =0.6
m th ,air 0.047
Using the above formulations and the values obtained from the experiment, the
following results were obtained.
It shows a steady rise in the Corrected Break Power with the maximum value
being approximately 16.4 kW until about 3500rpm after which it drops to a value
of approximately 13.8 kW.
The following graph shows the corrected Break Thermal Efficiency vs RPM:
It shows a relatively constant efficiency value until at 2500 rpm where it rises to
0.250 at 3000 rpm and then drops and keeps dropping steadily till 0.125 at
approximately 500 rpm.
It shows a low gradient drop at the beginning at 1500 rpm with roughly 1.1
excess air coefficient till 3000 rpm where it rises till 1.2 and then drop to
approximately 1.0 at 3500 rpm and then a slow rise in gradient until 5000 rpm
with 1.0 excess air coefficient.
The following graph shows the volumetric efficiency vs RPM:
It shows a steady drop for 0.75 at 1500 rpm down to 0.6 at 3000 rpm and keeps
decreasing but at a slower pace down to 0.55 at 5000 rpm.
iv. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
This experiment gave us an idea of how flow devices are used in the modern day.
Each and every method has its own advantages and disadvantages over the
other but nevertheless provided an excellent option based on the resources that
are on hand at that moment.
Answering the report questions as follows: