22.

The is no criminal liability committed if a person who enters the dwelling of

another against the latters will and by means of violence or intimidation for the
purpose of preventing some harm to himself.
The provisions of article 280 shall not be applicable to any person who shall
enter another's dwelling for the purpose of preventing some serious harm to
himself, the occupants of the dwelling or a third person, nor shall it be applicable to
any person who shall enter a dwelling for the purpose of rendering some service to
humanity or justice, nor to anyone who shall enter cafes, taverns, inn and other
public houses, while the same are open.

23. When the offender shall ill-treat another by deed without causing any injury,
and without causing dishonor, the offense is Maltreatment under Article 266,[98] par.
3 of the Revised Penal Code. (People of the Philippines vs Bernard Mapalo, G.R. No.
172608)

24. I, a housemaid, committed Robbery in an uninhabited place or in a private

building when she broke into a pawnshop with intent on stealing items of jewelry in
it. She found, however, that the jewelry were in a locked chest. Unable to open it,
she took the chest out of the shop. (bar exam question MCQ)

25. The crime robbery in an inhabited house or public building is mitigated:

a. When the offenders do not carry arms, and the value of the property taken
exceeds 250 pesos;
b. when the offenders are armed, but the value of the property taken does
not exceed 250 pesos;
c. When said offenders do not carry arms and the value of the property taken
does not exceed 250 pesos; and
d. If the robbery be committed in one of the dependencies of an inhabited
house, public building, or building dedicated to religious worship.

***although armed took property valued at only P200. ( sagot sa bar, MCQ) yung
nasa taas galing sa book

26. The exchanges of highly offensive words between two quarrelling women in
the presence of a crowd of people constitute two separate counts of light slander,
one for each woman.

27. None. There is no complex crime of serious illegal detention with rape
committed.
As the court ruled [in People vs Lactao, 227 scra 463], there is no complex
crime of illegal detention with rape under Article 48 of the RPC because there is no
single act which results in two or more grave or less grave felonies. Neither is illegal
detention a necessary means for committing rape [People vs Gonzales, GR No
129894; People vs Nuguid, GR No 148891]

28. No, Parricide under Article 246 of the RPC is incorrect charge.
If the child killed by his parent is less than 3 days (72 hours) old, the crime is
Infanticide.

29. No, the prosecutors charge of Robbery with homicide is incorrect

 The proper charges are separate offenses of Robbery and Homicide. Since the
Homicide was not committed on the occasion or by reason of the Robbery.

30. Yes, O is liable for violation of Anti-Fencing Law. (hindi ko sure to)