OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM S.Y.

2016 - 2017
Name of Employee: ONOFRE D. LIMPAYOS Name of Rater: NESTOR L. BOLAYO
Position: School Principal I Position: PSDS,OIC- Office of the Schools Division Superintendent
School/ District/ Division: Bot-oan Elementary School, Buguias, Benguet Date of Review:
Rating Period April 2016 - March 2017 Name of Rater:
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
MF 1.KRAs 1.1. Quarterly May 60%
Weigh QUALITY Quarterly Instructional 5 5 5 5 0.25
OBJECTIVES TIMELI PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT RATING SCORE
Instruc- Instructional 2016
NE Supervisory plan
O t per (a. Prescribed
Quality, format Timeliness)
Efficiency, followed. Q E T Av
tional Supervisory April KRA b. Instructional needs of all prepared with the
e
Leader- Plan (QISP) 2017 teachers per teachers characterized
by the indicators stated
ship preparation per learning area identified.
in the 6th column of this
(5%) c. QISP prepared with teachers. chart and submitted 2
d. Appropriate observation tools days before due date.
indicated (Based on identified
needs).
e. Schedule of classroom
Provision of Quality Basic Education

observation
calendared.
f. QISP submitted and accepted.
5= All indicators met 2= 3
indicators met
4= 5 indicators met 1= 1-2
indicators met
3= 4 indicators met 0= No QISP
submitted
EFFICIENCY
5= Submitted QISP was accepted
without returning to the school for
improvement/ correction.
4= Submitted QISP was returned
once to the school for improvement
before its acceptance.
3= Submitted QISP was returned
twice to the school for
improvement.
2= Submitted QISP was returned
thrice to the school for
improvement.
1= Submitted QISP was returned
more than 4 times
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM S.Y. 2016 - 2017
Name of Employee: ONOFRE D. LIMPAYOS Name of Rater: NESTOR L. BOLAYO
Position: School Principal I Position:
Advocacy PSDS,OIC-
0n the Office of the 5
Schools5Division Superintendent
5 0.125
2.2 June 5 Q - No records of bullying/ Zero
Education

School/ District/ Division: Bot-oan Elementary School, bullyingBuguias, cases Benguet Date of Review:
guidelines/ policies on
Guidelines/
1.5.3. Eighty- 2016
June 5 T Q- 100% Graduation Rate
every
4= needs
All-Q 3 employees
Procured
- inventory
indicators inbut
materials
met the
provided/ school.
60
faileddays of100% graduation rate 5 5 0.125
Education

1
0= No
5= QISP
All 64% and
submitted
indicators belowmet. average
3= 3
Education

policies Rating
on Period March
April 2016 - March 2017 E - All bullying cases addressed Name Rater:protection
Child
five percent 2016 ONCE attained
4=fromThe
repaired
TIMELINESS: in school
the
anyrelease of implemented
of fund at
the indicators.
attained attained for school year
Child 2017
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING on time. indicators met implemented thatTO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
2016-2017.
(85%)
1.4. 20% of the June least
4
3= All
QUALITY
5= QISP
4= 1
allotment
E-
Q- 2-5%
90 research/innovation/
4
indicators
was 99%saved
indicators Graduation
from
met
submitted but
met. the
2 CI/
budget
Rate
failed
working
2= 2 Met at least 5 indicators 4 5 4.5 0.45
MF KRAs OBJECTIVES
protection TIMELI Weigh 4 Q - Bullying cases
PERFORMANCE reduced to 2 eluded
INDICATORS ACTUAL observation
RESULT of RATING SCORE
O Graduation
total number March
2016- t per Case
TWICE
1
days
a. Q
StandardStudy
Tattained
-before
The
Below
in any forofevery
project
59%
DepEd the
indicators
the duewas 4met
Teachers employees
completed
indicators.
format
date. needs
for an the school
bullying cases with in
Basic

NE ( E - 4 5 bullying cases addressed

Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T Av
implemented
Rate
of attained.
school 2017
March KRA in
3 the
2=
4= 3
of
Q-LMs
All
basic
QISP school.
5
80 days
indicators
89%
research/
was before the
Graduation
met
submitted
1= but1target
innovation/
1 indicator failed
Rate
CI/
working
met implemented
the school premise.at least 1
on time. e
Basic

that reduced
Basic

(2.5%)
personnel 2017 3=
day CSThe
date.
THRICEattained school
identified/listed
of
followed.
before anytheof implemented
the indicators.
due. and from at 10 Continuous
3 EFFICIENCY
Q - Reduced Bullying cases
bullying from least 175% research/innovation/ CI/ Improvement obtaining
of Quality

conducted/imp 1=
3
2 5=procured
Q-
All
Q-
Minimum indicators
70 - 79%ofrequirement
the met
four
co-but
Graduation identified
failed
Rate
forextra-
every
Education

3=
b. toQISP410 cases was
functional submitted andon due
10 to 4 cases. Case Study for every 5implemented
employees at least 2% of its
lemented more T
needs
--than
Eattained
part
date, Procured
last
curricular 2ofbased
4bullying
the times
working R/I/
programsmaterials
onCI in
the
day any school
proposal of
75the
preceding days Page 1 of
Quality

3 cases addressed
of Quality

(2.5%) objective. 26

action in
1 4=
the the
indicators.
from
facilities
provided/
Q-
onquarter.
9 school.
time. release
functional
Below needs ofGraduation
written.
70% inventory
fund
co- and allotmentRate
extra-
2.4.
research June 2=
2
c. The
provided/
EFFICIENCY
5 Q
Focus
attained
QISP
curricular school
- Prepared,
Bullying
or priority
was implemented
repairedapproved
cases
submitted
programs reduced
problem/s & at
1 day
implemented No Instructional 1 1 1 0.025 Page 2 of
26

Instructional
/innovation/cas
1.5.4. Eighty 2016 least
5= E
after
5 3= 36
from
clearly
Q--8 1Exact
implemented
the
100%research/innovation/
formal
10 due to
stated.
functional observations
7 Instructional
amount
date.
Retention co-based Rate
and on CI/
the
extra- Materialsretention
94.17% per subject rate 4 4 0.10
Provision
Basic
of

eMaterials
study that
percent per
(80%) Case
conducted
1=
d. -Study
budget
Materials
Eattained
Appropriate
QISP
curricular was
1Bullying
was for
inprograms
and
a every
spent.cases6implemented
quarter.
used
methodology/
submitted byemployees
increased
more tools
than areas prepared,
attained, school year Page 3 of

approved and 26
Provision

in T
the The
school. project was completed 2016-2017.
Provision

subject
improved areas
retention Rate March 4=
1
4 2=two
30
to
used.
day
Q-7 690formal
or
after more
functional
99% observations
the due teachers.
co-date.
Retention and extra-
Rate
on implemented as
prepared,
learning
attained.
1.2. Thirty-six 2017
June 1=
conducted
1
e. E
Q
QUALITY --the
The
Effective
curricular
attained Three target
school
Bullyinginprograms
(3) date. implemented
a implemented
quarter.
Instructional
Intervention/s
cases was not at 150 formal classroom 5 5 5 0.75
Provision of Quality

required in the
approved
outcomes
(2.5%)
(36) formal and 2016- least
2
3= Q- 1
materials
24 51
implemented.
reduced
a.3 Teaching
1=Q-580 research/innovation/
formal - 74%
functional per
learning
89% of the
observations
subject four
co- process
Retention area
and extra- CI/
Rate observations for the Page 4 of

Curriculum. 26

implemented
during
classroom the March Case
conducted
4
f. --Study
identified
Research/es
Q
Eattained
analyzed.
curricular Prepared,
No Bullying for
needs
inprogramsevery
a quarter.
or based7implemented
Project/s
approved
cases employees
on
& the whole rating period
2. as
ratingrequired
period.
observations
2.1. 75% of in the 2017April in
(10 b.2= 5the
school
18
monitored
addressed school.
formal
implemented
2 Pre-conference
Q-Q- 70 90-facilities
79% 100% needs
observations
byRetention
higher
IMs ofand
conducted.the inventory
office
used
four by
Rate including
90% of the IMESfour 5 5 5 5 0.125
the
Learning (10%)
2.3 75%
perfour identified June
grading 2016 0=
5 Q No
provided/
%)g.c.conducted
Comprehensive
one
Post - research
teacher
86%
conference
identified
attained in to a implemented.
repaired
quarter.
100%
needsProject Teachers
conducted
based onwith
the identified
Teachers
classroom needs
needs of based
LMs 5 5 5 0.125 Page 5 of
26
1.5.1
Curriculum.
needs
Environm Teachers
period based on June
2016
5
1= E-
Q
12
Completion
1 TAE 5%
- Below
needs
Q-school
formal more
Twoof(2) Zero
LMs than
observations
Report
facilities
70% the
dropout
(PCR)
Instructional budget
identified/listed
needs
Retention prepared
Rate rate Maintained
on the
identified/listed
observation a
school zero
facilities
and 5 5 0.125
ent Performance
the school
(2.5%)
needs
conducted of LMs 2016
March
March was
maintained
conducted
and andsubmitted
materials
provided.
inventory spent.
procuredin pera provided/
quarter.
atsubject
least 30 areadays
repaired dropout
needs all
almost within
inventory
characterized procuredthe
by the
attained
Indicator; school year.
provided/repaired
facilities
identified/liste
usingCo-
1.6. varied needs
2017
2017
June d.34
0= T
after
QQNo
T E-
--the
Follow-up
QUALITY The
3-4%
Prepared,
Procured
6-10% project
observations
project decreased
class was
approved
materials completed
in
conducted
completion.
from10
observation
saved dropout
& days
the every first
indicators
All
month
in the of
extra-curricular 6by
ththe
5 5 5 .50 Page 6 of
Decreased
inventory March 1 week
rate afterto the target date. the end
quarter.
Only 89% of June. 26
1.3.
d and 75% to
observation
curricular and June
2016 5 conducted.
from
budget Qrelease
implemented
a. -Approved
91% of100%
fund
action average
allotment
plans column
programs/ ofGeneral
this chart
activities 4 4 0.40
Dropout rate
provided/repair 2017 5=Q- AllOnly 6 indicators met. Average MPS on Grade
80%
procured
tools with
Extra- 2016-
March e.13
4 Q
Suggestions/
Q T- 76% 2% The 50%
decreased
Instructional
to
prepared of for
options
85%
project the
attained infour
dropout
Materials
given
Teachers
wasall to
co- needs
completed were
using implemented
varied in Page 7 of
(2.5%)
ed by the end 4=identified
5indicators
rate needsmet. based on the Six
the Class
school attained.
level to
26
General
every
technicalfirst
curricular March
2017 4 E
the
of 1- One
Q
teacher
LMsweek - 81%
(1) Instructional
before
curricular to 90%
the average
target
programs/ date. observation tools
of June. 3=school
4 indicators met. enhance learners
average
month
assistance
Programs ofMPS
the 2017 2 4materials
Q-Q- 1%
accepted facilities
decreased
per
identified/listed
80 - 89%
activities. and needs
attained
subject
of in and inventory
dropout
area
implemented.
the four all with technical
(2.5%) 2=provided/
2 indicators met. performance and tothe
of Grade
quarter.
during theSix rate
35=subject
All
procured Q areas
indicators
-All75% repaired
tomet80% in average
all formal
on thein assistance during
1identified
(10%) b. needs
learners based
are involved
Page 8 of

1=E- indicator met

26
capacitate them with
attained.
(2.5%)
rating period. 1
2 Q --10%
TQ-school
observations NoPrepared,
Procured
at more
decrease than
conducted.
attained
approved
materials
facilities
least one the budget
in co-curricular
dropout but
20 rate
not
days rating period.
(10%) EFFICIENCY
was spent emergency
(15%)Eighty-
1.5.2. 25 implemented
Q- 100%
from Q release
- 65%
activityCSR Instructional
of
to attained
of fund
74%theirallotment
average
interest. Attained 87.80% of
preparedness. Top
3 3 0.075
5=TThe The school project implemented
was completed at Cohort Survival Rate for
five percent 4 Materials
3 QQ--c. 9070% 99%
All to attained
75%CSRTeachers
co-curricular attained needs performers represented
activities
least
2 1 research/innovation/
weeks after the target CI/
date. the school year.
CSR Rate E - One (1) Instructional
Page 9 of
3 of Q-LMs 80 implemented
89% CSR attained as planned. the school to district 26
Case Study for
attained. 2 materials
Q- d. 70 - All
79% per
identified/listed subject
CSR
co-curricular area
and
attained all
activities level and some went as
(2.5%) subject
1 procured
Q- Below areas
monitored70% CSR higher office far as the division level.
by attained
T - e. Procured materials activities
All co-curricular 30 days
from release evaluated/ of fund assessallotment
2 Q - 60% to 69% Teachers needs
quarterly.
of LMs
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM S.Y. 2016 - 2017
Name of Employee: ONOFRE D. LIMPAYOS Name of Rater: NESTOR L. BOLAYO
Position: School Principal I Position: PSDS,OIC- Office of the Schools Division Superintendent
School/ District/ Division: Bot-oan Elementary School, Buguias, Benguet Date of Review:
promotion orPeriod April 2016 - March EFFICIENCY
1Q the
Qthe
Utilization-EThe
No time
start
Review
80 frame/schedule
Prepared
of ofall
89%
classes.
was
school
ofInstructional
not
the funds
done
objectives
Provisio

4 T 76-89% project of the

was Teachers
completed 1 of Rater:
Education

Rating e. 2017 Name

outstanding 5=
4 Conducted
properly
3need
Materials
EQ
week
Q attained
85% No
75communicated
addressed
after 1 school
documents
-of84%
before
the
the of
targetthe
schoolthe
through based
submitted
IPDP
to
target
date of date
all
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
INSET per quarter and at least 1 TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
MF
employee) Weigh
1stakeholders.
E Temployees
- T One
NoMOA
coaching/mentoring
personnel Instructional
technical
signed
implemented
documents
Q - Php 39, 999.00 and below assistance
within
materials
were the
as
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELI PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT RATING SCORE
O (2.5%) NE LAC
t per f. All per
T session
Financial
given.
planned.
-months
reviewed.
acquired subject
75% per
ofreports
of area
the month.
August for
posted
Teachers atosubject
in the
need
( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T Av
n of

4. 4.1. June, 5%
KRA 4= EConducted
transparency
areaE10%
September.
5 addressed
Q -85%Attained
Php of 1 than
board school
75
100,000.00
more through
the documentsthe based
-immediately
84% and of above
budget the
were Acquired 100,000.00 5 5 5 5 0.15
e
Basic

3.
Partners
Human Proposals
3.1. At / June
2016 - 10% INSET
QUALITY Qinspent
objective - two
2coaching/mentoring
complete
wasacquired quarters
Partnership
andattained
appropriateand
before
forged
twice at(MOA)
least
the
(2x) amount for project
Conducted all the 5 5 5 0.125
1 LAC TEtarget session date in two months. within
required the
LACrating
for period.
the
Education

Resource
hip resolution
least 1 LAC / 2016
Mar, a. a. Teachers
a month
with Technical
6 at 10%
training
least saved
assistance
The project was completedone needssupport
from on
the the
group
and requests
session 2017 3=Q
3 Conducted
T-/ individual
identified. -75%
appropriate
twobudget Implemented
weeks 1 school
documents
of after
the but did
Teachers
the based
within
notto
target the
prosper
be
needdate Said project
school year and wasone Page 10
of Quality

of 26

INSET completed
inset during on
the time.
midyear
Developm 4.2.prepared,
conducted March
June, b. b.
5 Ttime
Based -and
prepared
E
addressed
Q The70
on 4project
Partnership LAC
frame/schedule
the
was79%
throughsessions
identified
given
ofwas
forgedthe two during
completed
objectives
- three
(MOA) Partnership forged 5 5 5 5 0.10
ent forwarded
every
Partnership to 2017
2016 - the school
professional
2coaching/mentoring
(21Q
with attained
-3)
week
at 65 year.
monthsbefore
leastdevelopment
74%
before after
threeof
the thethe
target
supportIPDP
target
start
need/s
date
ofofall assessment.
date with three support
identified
month
forged (MOA) March 2=
of 4T Conducted
the
classes.
employees
T
Q- 75%
group teachers.

- Php MOA 1
of80,000 school
signed
implemented
the Teachers
/ individual to based
within
byPhp the99, the
need as
end of group by the end of
Basic

partners
withand/or
at least1and , 2017 INSET
c. c.
3 Correct and
planned.
months
addressed
Q999.00
the 75%
school less
INSET
ofof
acquiredthan
October
training
through
the
year 4 LAC
school to
design the school year with
Provision

acquired
INSET
one support sessions
prepared.E December.
-
coaching/mentoring
Epersonnel
E 100% during
Attained
2 5% the
65
documents
of saved school
- 74%
from
the objectives year.
of
monthly.
were
the the its objective attained Page 11
of 26

funds
yearly.
group / or in 1=1
d.
2 LAC
Q Noobjective
reviewed.
budget
Q65
attained formal
implementation
- No - 74% school
attained
Partnership
before of the based
before
plan INSET
the
established
target
Teachers date 100%.
Provision of Quality

kind
(2.5%)
5. School individual
5.1. that
75% byto June, and
12% prepared ETLAC
target
MOA
QUALITY
need
T 75%
Thesession/s
date
of
project
addressedsigned conducted
the documents
was
through
before completed
thewere MOOE and other 5 5 5 0.15 Page 12
of 26

supported
leadership the 84%
end MOOE
of the the 2016 - during
e. The 3T -the
Adult
complete
coaching/mentoring
start School
of school
5Implemented
learning
days and
classes. before
Head year.
methodologyone target
appropriate
the
ensures (1) week(4
the special fund
, 3.2.
school
and75-84%
other of
identified
year JuneMar, 5 following
As)
4 TQ -- 75%
Tused.
after
date 95-100%the
Technical
Partnership theof
time
of during thethe IPDP
frame/schedule
assistance
Teachers
forged of all
on
rating
need
(MOA) the allotments
100% accurately
of the IPDP of 5 5 4 4.67 0.12
the
Managem (2%) IPDP needs.
school
special offund
all 20162017 f.31 employees
Monitored
appropriate
Q -at
period:
addressed
Q
with Less
Php leastand implemented
than evaluated
documents
60,000
through
two 65%to Php
support of thetoas
79, be
IPDP liquidated
teachers wereper COA Page 13
of 26

employees
(3%) planned.
g. Disbursement
Training
prepared
of all/employees objectives
was was given attained.
implemented
five policies and
implemented and
ent and allot-ments a. coaching/mentoring
999.00
group acquired
individual based
by the to
every onsixof
end
guidelines, submitted
the addressed through LACs
Operation implemented
liquidated per March EEas --6)
h. Knowledge/
(5
accepted
quarter.
the Attained
planned.
months
Exact
school SIP 95-100%
skills
amount
yearandafter theofstart
gained
approved
based the
by of
onPPMP. at seminars
the Schools Division
and Page 14
as planned.
COA policies 2017 1
b. Q
Eobjective
participants
classes.
FundsE 90
budget Less
Belowwere
99% attained
implemented.
than
was used
65% of65%
spent
oftothe
the before
supportthethe
ofTeachers
objectives of 26
Office on or before the
conducted.
(2.5%)
and guidelines i. target
2 INSET Tobjectives
identified
Q
need
attained50% The date
completion attained
project
of
addressedpriority
the
before report
school
was
the items/
through prepared
before
completed
target the
services.
date prescribed due dates. Page 15
submitted at and T -
personnel
on Implemented
submitted.
target
c. Procurement date
the target
coaching/mentoring
MOA documents
signedprocedures
date four
withinwere (4) weeks
followed.
the of 26

the Schools 5=
d. Tbefore
All
T
2Eligibility
reviewed.
months
Q -No IPDPthe
indicators
Funds time toframe/schedule
met
implemented
ofrequirements
coachingJun
worth done.
July.
Php 40,000oftwo (2)
funds to
3.4.Division
Document Office June 4=
4 Q8
3 observed.
5 QEPhp
indicators
weeks
- 50% 85 -
Partnership
100% 94%
59,afterofofthe
999 met
theof
the the
documents
acquired
forged
school IPDP
target(MOA) of
date all Two of the teachers have 5 5 5 5 0.125 Page 16
3.3. on75%or before
of qualified of the 2016 June 3= employees
7EQindicators
5personnel
were
with -5%at90-100%
complete
more
least implemented
met
documents
one of
and
than the appropriate
the
support as
Teachers
budget
were received
Addressedtheir90% of the 5 4 4.5 0.113 of 26

e.
2=reviewed.
planned. Submitted all liquidation appointments for
teachers need through
Teachers
the prescribed
school need 2016 T6was
group indicators
need Technical
/ addressed
spentindividual met
assistanceby the on
through endthe of
reports that are correct with promotion
mentoring forat
Teacher
least III
addressed
due dates
personnel
March 1=E E5coaching/mentoring
the -and Attained
appropriate
All
school below
appropriate 85
year.indicators
- 94%
documents ofmet
documents the
to be through ERF this school Page 17
complete
T
objective - 75% attained
of theand before
Teachers appropriate
the
need twice a month. of 26
through
were(3%)reviewed March
2017 prepared
were present wasin given
eachseven to year and another 1 has
attachments.
addressed
Page 18

coaching/mentor
within the 2017 target
eight
employees (7date-8) through
months
folder after the already submitted her of 26

ing)
year and TT coaching/mentoring
- Implemented
start of classes.
Technical two3x(2)
assistance monthly
weeks
on the folder for approved ERF
before item implementation last
(2.5%)
recommended appropriate documents to be march 2017.
for prepared was given within one Page 19

(1) month after

of 26
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM S.Y. 2016 - 2017
Name of Employee: ONOFRE D. LIMPAYOS Name of Rater: NESTOR L. BOLAYO
Position:
School Principal I Position: PSDS,OIC- Office of the Schools Division Superintendent
School/ District/ Division:
Bot-oan Elementary School, Buguias, Benguet Date of Review:
deadline
c.school
reports
3= SIP for
with
format
Ensured not improvement.
the
incorrect/
90% extension)
followed. complete
-88% accuracyentries/
of Quality Basic Education

Rating Period April 2016 - March 2017 1= Liquidation report/s returned Name of Rater:
dates; and failed toSIP/
submit more
5=
d.
on2=to Finalized
Gap Submitted
all
the or
data processand
entered
school moresubmitted
AIP
analysis
to was 3xthan
LIS/EBEIS
than due 3
to
required reports.
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
reports
returned
correctly
2= Ensured 2 days
thrice
done. 87% before
to
errors/ with lacking documents.
EFFICIENCY
the
-85% the
school
deadline
accuracy for
MF KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELI Weigh PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT RATING SCORE
or
e.
onimprovement.
earlier
All data
all PIAs identified
entered to Timeliness)
LIS/EBEIS
(NOTE: not Liquidation
O NE t per 5= Did
Quality, receive
Efficiency,call up reports
(written/ Q E T Av
KRA f.1=
1= Submitted
Objectives
Ensured
submitted
text/call) in
below SIP/
the85%
after
for non-submission AIP
thewas
SIP properly
accuracy
due
of reports
e
4= Finalized and submitted reports
returned
and
stated.
on duedata
all
date/s more
reports
areenteredforthan
not the to4LIS/EBEIS
whole
entitled times/
rating
for Noa SIP
1 day before the deadline
period.
g. point
EFFICIENCY
submitted of .4 or 5programs,
All necessary in efficiency.
3=Received
4= Finalized andupsubmitted
1 call (written/ text/call)
projects
Based
TIMELINESS
TIMELINESS
for onand the activities
duration for of3 years
reports on the deadline and due
non-submission of reports Page 20
Basic Education

included.
updating
5=5=ESIP
reports Allfor (45
liquidation
Accepted
the wholedays on updating,
report/s
rating or before
period
of 26

2= Finalized and submitted Page 21

h.
15
3= Reasonable
June days
accepted
Received
30, 2016. callproposed
validation)
2by the
up accounting
(written/ budget
text/call) of 26
reports
for 1
non-submission day after the deadline
allocation
5-4= Have
section days of
2prepared.
ESIPfinished
Accepted or reports
everyon or and
task
earlier due45
for
before
before
1=
reportsFinalized
for the and submitted
whole rating period
i.July
days PPA
the orMonitoring
due
29, earlier
date. with and TA evaluation
request not
reports
2= Received 22016
days
3 callafter the deadline
up (written/ text/call)
Provision
Provision

attached.
exceeding
3=
for 4= ESIP
non-submission to 5x of
All liquidation
accepted toreports
all
on tasks.
reports
or and
before due
No score for those who were Page 22
j.August
SIP endorsed/
4-Have
accepted
reports forfinished
31,
the by2016 the
whole signed
everyaccounting
rating by the
task
period for 46- of 26

not able to submit/ finalize on-

school
48
1=2= days
section
Received
ESIP stakeholders.
with
1 4day or
accepted TAmore
request
before on upof
the
callor not
due
(written/
before
Page 23
of 26
line
text/call)reportsfor non-submission
5=
more 10than
date. indicators
6x2016 to all tasks. reports
complied. of
Provision of Quality

5.4. All June October

QUALITY 15, All reports/ forms were 5 5 3 4.33 0.13
and
4= due
9ESIP
out reports
of 10forindicators
the whole rating
3-Have
1=3= All finished
liquidation
accepted every task for 49-15, submitted complete
reports
reports/ after formsOctober
Page 24

reports/ forms 2016 5=

period Required submitted of 26

complied.
50 days
accepted
2016. with on
are complete and correct.
TIMELINESS TAduerequest
dates. of not and correct on due
were
5.3. EBEIS / LIS June 3=
more
5= 2= 8
QUALITY
All indicators
than
All
reports/ 7x
liquidation
(Based to
forms complied
all
4= Required reports/ forms submitted tasks.
reports
on
were the
submitted matrix 2 EBEIS / LIS
dates. 5 5 5 5 0.15
submitted on March Page 25

updated/compl 2016 2=
2-Have
days
of
are 7 orindicators
accepted finished
earlier
accountability,
complete 1 day
before
and complied
every
after
the
correct task
the
deadline.
D.O. for
due
52,
except 51-
for updated/completed of 26

due dates. 2017

eted 1=
4=
53 6 reports/
All
days
date. indicators
withforms TA complied
were submitted
requests of not1 and other online
(3%)and other 2016)
1-2
day
reports.
before the deadline. reports finalized and
online reports March EFFICIENCY
more
3= 1= than
All
Required
School Heads8x
liquidation to
reports/ all reports
(SHs) tasks.
forms
must submitted
ensure
3= All reports/ forms were submitted on submitted before the
finalized and 2017 5=
are
1-Have
due Submitted
complete
accepted
the finished
accuracy
dates
and
more
or (other SIP/
and than
formsAIP
correct
the 1and
task except
for more
day
completeness
submitted
for of
after
3-4 reports.
accepted without due date.
submitted Reviewed
on thanthe
data
before 53
due
deadline)date. returning to the
days.
timeSIP /by:
5.2. AIP May 2=
school
5= Required
TIMELINESS
QUALITY
Ensured reports/
for improvement/
95%is-100% forms accuracy
submitted SIP / AIP developed and 5 5 2 4 0.12
2=
is One report/
complete and formcorrect submitted
except 1for
day 5
developed
(3%) HERMINIA
Septem M. OSTING
correction.
Based
The
on all on
School the given
Head deadline
ensures the finalized characterized
after
reports thedatadeadline.
with
entered to LIS/EBEIS
incorrect/ complete
finalized and ber 4=
SP III, District Coordinating
(14=st
Submitted
given
following:
Ensured 92%SIP/-94% AIP wasaccuracy by the indicators in the
entries/
Principala.returned dates; and failed to submit 1-2 6th column and
submitted by 2016 ona. all
required6-7data once to theto
representatives
reports. entered school for
of groups
LIS/EBEIS
improvement before itssubmitted submitted September
the end of 1=ofRequired
stakeholders reports/ involved
forms in theare
1st of 2016.
September acceptance.
preparation
complete and correct of the SIP. for more
except
(3%) 3= Submitted
than 6 SIP/AIP was Prepared
returned twice SIP.
b. Data-based by:
SUMMARY ONOFRE D. LIMPAYOS
ONOFRE D. LIMPAYOS School Principal I
HERMINI
School Principal I Ratee
Prepared Ratee A M.
Reviewed
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM S.Y. 2016 - 2017
Name of Employee: ONOFRE D. LIMPAYOS Name of Rater: NESTOR L. BOLAYO
Position: School Principal I Position: PSDS,OIC- Office of the Schools Division Superintendent
School/ District/ Division: Bot-oan Elementary School, Buguias, Benguet Date of Review:
6.Perfor 6.1. Performed at June, 3% Q - Performed at least three (3) Performed three 5 5 0.15
Provision of Quality Basic Education

Rating
least one (1) Period April
2016 - 2016 - March 2017
5 additional function delegated by Name of Rater:
ms other additional function
additional TO BEMarch,
FILLED IN DURING PLANNINGhigher office TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
delegated by higher
function/ function 2017 Q - Performed at least two (2)
MF Weigh
s KRAs OBJECTIVES PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT RATING SCORE
TIMELI office.
O delegated by NE t per 4 additional
( Quality, function delegated
Efficiency, by
Timeliness) Q E T Av
delegate higher office KRA higher office
(3%)
e
d by Q - Performed at least one (1)
higher 3 additional function delegated by
higher office
office KRAs N0. Of Rating Score
Q - Delegated additional function but
2 Objectives
did not performed
I. additional
Q - no Instructional Leadership = 60%
function 6 27.76 2.78
II. Learning Environment = 10% 4 16 0.40
III. Human Resource Management and 4 19.17 0.48
1 Development = 10%
IV. Partnership = 5% 2 10 0.25
V. School Leadership, Management and 4 18.33 0.55
Operation = 12%
*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned VI. Performs other Function/s delegated by higher 1 5 0.15
OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Office = 3% 4.61
TOTAL 19 4.61
DESCRIPTIVE RA
OUTSTANDING
TING

NESTOR L. BOLAYO
PSDS, OIC Assistant Schools Division
Superintendent FEDERICO P. MARTIN, Ed.D., CESO VI
Schools Division Superintendent
Approving Authority Page 26 of 26