Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
graphs in order to determine the path of safety for an adventure-seeking archaeologist, Ohio
Jones.
The first day focused on getting the students familiar with having two inequalities on
one graph and with what it means for a point to be part of the solution of a system of
inequalities. Day two involved using inequalities to narrow the coordinate the plane to a
single possible solution. We also related this idea to trying to describe to someone where their
school is located. The third day put the students to task graphing multiple systems of
inequalities.
I administered the following assessment in the form of an exit ticket on the second
day of instruction:
The students had already
(a) was to assess prior knowledge and give lower level students an entry point. Part (b) was to
again assess prior knowledge while recording a students ability to physically graph the
inequality. The third part was designed to address my main focus: does the student understand
the meaning of the solution set? A written explanation was required here. Part (d) was added
so that the students will become accustomed to identifying the intersection of the system.
Scoring
This assessment was evaluated using a scoring rubric. I broke down the graphing of
inequalities into smaller parts and gave the students partial credit based on which tasks they
completed successfully. In doing so, I could see which students did not possess the
prerequisite skills for graphing inequalities (y-intercept, slope, greater than, less than, or
equal to signs). I was also able to discern which students had achieved the objective of the
lesson-- What does it mean if a point is in the solution set of a system of inequalities-- and
which had not. And I was also able to see if any students were already able to graph a
My students' scores ranged from 3 points up to 9 points, out of a possible 10. Since I
had asked the students to explain in writing whether a particular point was part of the solution
set of the system, I was able to see where any confusion might exist. Analyzing the results of
the class showed me that there was confusion over whether or not a point on one or two of
the boundaries of the set should be included in the solution. I also noticed that not everyone
Since I think it is important for a student to understand what it means to be part of the
solution set, I included a criterion which assessed whether or not the student mentioned that
being part of the solution meant that the point satisfied both inequalities and/or was located in
the intersection of each individual system. Only one student received a point here. She
plugged the point (2,1) into both inequalities and said that it was not part of the solution
Next Steps
As a result of this assessment, I knew what needed to be addressed in the coming days
and homework assignments on the concepts of dotted lines, solid lines, and solutions. For
those without the prerequisite skills, We set up stations on identifying and graphing slope and
y-intercept and I gave all students a handout which summarized graphing lines and one which
In Conclusion
Because of this in depth teaching experience during my student teaching, I am better able to
use assessments as a way to not only monitor student learning but also to provide future