ARAMP

Excel Template
FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE ANNUAL ROAD ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN (ARAMP)

Only fill in the orange cells in the tables on the following sheets. Do not
change the other cells as these are either fixed titles (gray) or are
copied/calculated automatically from other cells (white). Where orange cells
have pre-entered data, check that these are correct for the district concerned.
Where data is missing or not in line with the ARAMP Guidelines, the cells will
be highlighted in red with white font - in these cases the data should be
adjusted or else a justification should be provided in the ARAMP Report.
Additional notes are provided above each table in red font.

2014-2015
Table ES.1 District road network Table ES.2 DRCN budget allocation
This table is automatically generated on the
This table is automatically generated on the basis of table 5.2.1
basis of table 2.1.1
Existing ARAMP DDC
Existing Black Existing Existing Estimated budget Discretionary Total funding
length Top Gravel Earthen cost allocation Funding for for DRCN
Road Class (km) (km) (km) (km) Maintenance type (NPR) (NPR) DRCN (NPR)
Strategic road Maintenance - - - -
network - - - -
Emergency - - - -
Urban roads - - - - maintenance
District road core Routine/recurrent - - - -
network - - - - maintenance
Specific maintenance - - - -
Village roads - - - -
Periodic maintenance - - - -
Total - - - -
Improvement - - - -
New construction - - - -
Total - - - -
Table 2.1.1 Roads in the district
This data should be copied from the DTMP report and
updated where necessary

Existing
Existing Black Existing Existing
length Top Gravel Earthen
Road Class (km) (km) (km) (km)
Strategic road network - - - -
Highways -
Feeder roads -
Urban roads - - - -
-
-
-
-
-
District road core
network - - - -
Village roads -
Total - - - -
Table 2.2.1 DRCN Roads
This data should be copied from the DTMP report and updated where necessary based
on the Rapid Condition Survey results. Additional DRCN roads planned for new
construction should also be entered, including proposed road codes. The list of DRCN
roads should not be changed from the DTMP identification!
RED: Road lengths (existing or planned) have not been entered for road

Existing Gravel

Existing length
Existing Black

Planned new
Fair weather
All weather
Earthen
Existing

length
(km)

(km)

(km)

(km)

(km)

(km)

(km)
Top
# Code Description
1 - - -
2 - - -
3 - - -
4 - - -
5 - - -
6 - - -
7 - - -
8 - - -
9 - - -

10 - - -
11 - - -
12 - - -
13 - - -
14 - - -
15 - - -
16 - - -
17 - - -
18 - - -
19 - - -
20 - - -
21 - - -
22 - - -
23 - - -
24 - - -
25 - - -
Total - - - - - - -
Percentage 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Table 3.1.1 Volumes of emergency maintenance
Emergency maintenance volumes should be determined during the Rapid
Condition Survey and filled in here
RED: Volume per kilometre exceeds limit defined in ARAMP Guidelines
(justification in report needed)

Existing Removing Embankme Repairing Repairing

length Landslides rocks nt slopes Diversion surface
# Code (km) (m3) (m3) (m3) (m3) (m) (m2)
Total - - - - - - -

1 - -
2 - -
3 - -
4 - -

5 - -
6 - -
7 - -
8 - -
9 - -
10 - -
11 - -
12 - -
13 - -
14 - -
15 - -
16 - -
17 - -
18 - -
19 - -
20 - -
21 - -
22 - -
23 - -
24 - -
25 - -
Table 3.1.2 Unit costs for emergency maintenance
These unit costs need to be updated based on actual costs
for recent similar works in order to achieve accurate cost
estimations
RED: No unit cost OR unit cost more than 50% higher than
proposed unit cost

ARAMP proposed
unit cost ARAMP actual unit cost
Activity Unit (NPR) (NPR)
Landslides m3 200 200
Removing rocks m3 700 700

Embankment m3 120 120

Repairing slopes m3 80 80
Diversion m 2,000 2,000
Repairing surface m2 80 80
Table 3.1.3 Estimated costs of emergency maintenance (NPR)

The estimated costs are calculated automatically on the basis of tables 3.1.1 and 3.1.2. Traffic data is
copied from table A1.2 (make sure the traffic data is entered in that table before ranking). Rank the
table by clicking the arrow at the top of the "Cost/vehicle" column and selecting "Sort A to Z"
RED: Cost not in line with volumes and unit rates OR total cost estimate not equal to sum OR no traffic
data available OR table not ranked by cost per vehicle
Cost/
Existing Embankme Repairing annual
length Landslides Rocks nt slopes Diversion Surface Total Traffic vehicle
# Code (km) (NPR) (NPR) (NPR) (NPR) (NPR) (NPR) (NPR) (VPD) (NPR)
- - - - - - - -

1 - - - - - - - - - - -

2 - - - - - - - - - - -

3 - - - - - - - - - - -

4 - - - - - - - - - - -

5 - - - - - - - - - - -

6 - - - - - - - - - - -

7 - - - - - - - - - - -

8 - - - - - - - - - - -

9 - - - - - - - - - - -

10 - - - - - - - - - - -

11 - - - - - - - - - - -

12 - - - - - - - - - - -

13 - - - - - - - - - - -

14 - - - - - - - - - - -

15 - - - - - - - - - - -

16 - - - - - - - - - - -

17 - - - - - - - - - - -

18 - - - - - - - - - - -

19 - - - - - - - - - - -

20 - - - - - - - - - - -

21 - - - - - - - - - - -

22 - - - - - - - - - - -

23 - - - - - - - - - - -

24 - - - - - - - - - - -

25 - - - - - - - - - - -
Table 3.2.1 Length of routine and recurrent maintenance (km)
All roads should receive routine/recurrent maintenance unless they
are in a non-maintanable condition or will be under periodic
maintenance / improvement
RED: Coverage is less than 80% of road length for relevant surface
type

Recurrent maintenance (earthen)

Recurrent maintenance (gravel)
Routine maintenance (km)

Recurrent maintenance
Existing Black Top

Existing Earthen

(blacktop) (km)
Existing Gravel
Existing length
Code

(km)

(km)

(km)

(km)

(km)

(km)
#
Total - - - - - - - -

1 - - - - - - - - -

2 - - - - - - - - -

3 - - - - - - - - -
4 - - - - - - - - -
5 - - - - - - - - -
6 - - - - - - - - -
7 - - - - - - - - -
8 - - - - - - - - -
9 - - - - - - - - -
10 - - - - - - - - -
11 - - - - - - - - -
12 - - - - - - - - -
13 - - - - - - - - -
14 - - - - - - - - -
15 - - - - - - - - -
16 - - - - - - - - -
17 - - - - - - - - -
18 - - - - - - - - -
19 - - - - - - - - -
20 - - - - - - - - -
21 - - - - - - - - -
22 - - - - - - - - -
23 - - - - - - - - -
24 - - - - - - - - -
25 - - - - - - - - -
Table 3.2.2 Unit costs for routine and
recurrent maintenance
These unit costs need to be entered based on
actual costs for recent similar works in order to
achieve accurate cost estimations
RED: No unit cost OR unit cost more than 50%
higher than proposed unit cost

ARAMP actual unit cost

ARAMP proposed
unit cost
Activity

(NPR)

(NPR)
Unit

Routine maintenance km 20,000 20,000

Recurrent maintenance km 100,000 100,000
(blacktop)
Recurrent maintenance km 30,000 30,000
(gravel)
Recurrent maintenance km 20,000 20,000
(earthen)
Table 3.2.3 Estimated costs for routine and recurrent maintenance (NPR)
The estimated costs are calculated automatically on the basis of tables 3.2.1 and
3.2.2. Traffic data is copied from table A1.2 (make sure the traffic data is entered in
that table before ranking). Rank the table by clicking the arrow at the top of the
"Cost/vehicle" column and selecting "Sort A to Z"
RED: Cost not in line with volumes and unit rates OR total cost estimate not equal to
sum OR no traffic data available OR table not ranked by cost per vehicle

Recurrent maintenance (earthen)

Recurrent maintenance (gravel)
Routine maintenance (NPR)

Recurrent maintenance

annual vehicle (NPR)

Existing length

(blacktop)

Total cost

Traffic
(NPR)

(NPR)

(NPR)

(NPR)

(VPD)

Cost/
Code

(km)
#

Total - - - - - -

1 - - - - - - - - -

2 - - - - - - - - -

3 - - - - - - - - -

4 - - - - - - - - -

5 - - - - - - - - -

6 - - - - - - - - -

7 - - - - - - - - -

8 - - - - - - - - -

9 - - - - - - - - -

10 - - - - - - - - -

11 - - - - - - - - -

12 - - - - - - - - -

13 - - - - - - - - -

14 - - - - - - - - -

15 - - - - - - - - -

16 - - - - - - - - -

17 - - - - - - - - -

18 - - - - - - - - -

19 - - - - - - - - -

20 - - - - - - - - -

21 - - - - - - - - -

22 - - - - - - - - -

23 - - - - - - - - -

24 - - - - - - - - -

25 - - - - - - - - -
Table 3.3.1 Volumes of specific maintenance
Specific maintenance volumes should be taken from the DTMP Survey and updated during the Rapid
Condition Survey and filled in here
RED: Volume per kilometre exceeds limit indicated in ARAMP Guidelines (justification in report needed)

Signage and road

Drainage repair
Gravelling (m2)
Existing length

placement (m)
Dry stone wall

furniture (km)
Embank-ment

sidedrains (m)
Black-topping

Bank removal

improvement

Over-hanging
Slope stabili-
pitching (m2)

Stone-paved
Gabion wall
Sealing (m2)

Pipe culvert
raising (m3)
Dry stone

Shoulder

Earthen
zation

drifts
Code

(km)

(m2)

(m3)

(m )
(m3)

(m2)

(m )

(m3)

(m )

(m )
cliff
3

3
#
Total - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1 - -
2 - -
3 - -
4 - -
5 - -
6 - -
7 - -
8 - -

9 - -
10 - -

11 - -
12 - -
13 - -
14 - -
15 - -
16 - -
17 - -
18 - -
19 - -
20 - -
21 - -
22 - -
23 - -
24 - -
25 - -
Table 3.3.2 Unit costs for specific
maintenance
These unit costs need to be entered based on
actual costs for recent similar works in order
to achieve accurate cost estimations
RED: No unit cost OR unit cost more than 50%
higher than proposed unit cost

ARAMP ARAMP
proposed actual unit
unit cost cost
Activity Unit (NPR) (NPR)
Dry stone pitching 2 1,200 1,200
m
Gravelling 2 600 600
m
Sealing 2 5,000 5,000
m
Blacktopping m2 6,000 6,000
Gabion wall 3 3,500 3,500
m
Dry stone wall m3 2,000 2,000
Slope stabilization 2 60 60
m
Bank removal m3 50 50
Embankment raising m3 60 60
Shoulder 3 60 60
m
improvement
Earthen sidedrains m 40 40
Pipe culvert placement m 2,000 2,000

Drainage repair m3 60 60
Stone-paved drifts m2 800 800
Overhanging cliff 3 80 80
m
Overhanging cliff km 20,000 20,000
Table 3.3.3 Estimated costs for specific maintenance

The estimated costs are calculated automatically on the basis of tables 3.3.1 and 3.3.2. Traffic data is copied from table A1.2 (make sure the traffic data is entered in that
table before ranking). Rank the table by clicking the arrow at the top of the "Cost/vehicle" column and selecting "Sort A to Z"
RED: Cost not in line with volumes and unit rates OR total cost estimate not equal to sum OR cost/km exceding limit of NPR300,000/km OR no traffic data available OR
table not ranked by cost per vehicle

Signage and road

Total costs (NPR)

placement (NPR)
sidedrains (NPR)
Gravelling (NPR)

Drainage repair

furniture (NPR)
Existing length

Total costs per

annual vehicle
Dry stone wall
pitching (NPR)

Bank removal
Black topping

improvement
Embankment

Over hanging
Sealing (NPR)

raising (NPR)

Stone-paved

Traffic (VPD)
stabilisation
Gabion wall

drifts (NPR)
Dry stone

km (NPR)
Shoulder

Earthen

Culvert
(NPR)

(NPR)

(NPR)

(NPR)

(NPR)

(NPR)

(NPR)

(NPR)

(NPR)
Slope

Cost/
Code

(km)

cliff
#

Total - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

14 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
16 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
19 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

22 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
23 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

25 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Table 3.4.1 Volumes of periodic maintenance
Periodic maintenance volumes should be taken from the DTMP Survey and updated during
the Rapid Condition Survey and filled in here
RED: Total periodic maintenance coverage less than 10% of road area (assuming a 3 metre
road width)

Road markings
Existing Gravel
Existing length

Resealing (m2)
Dragging (m2)
Existing Black

Painting steel
dressing (m2)
Grading (m2)

Overlay (m )
Regravelling

parts (m2)
Earthen
Existing

Surface

(km)
(km)

(km)

(km)

(km)

(m2)
Top

# Code
Total - - - - - - - - - - - -
1 - - - - -
2 - - - - -
3 - - - - -
4 - - - - -
5 - - - - -
6 - - - - -
7 - - - - -
8 - - - - -
9 - - - - -
# - - - - -
# - - - - -
# - - - - -
# - - - - -
# - - - - -
# - - - - -
# - - - - -
# - - - - -
# - - - - -
# - - - - -
# - - - - -
# - - - - -
# - - - - -
# - - - - -
# - - - - -
# - - - - -
Table 3.4.2 Standard costs for periodic
maintenance

These standard costs need to be entered

based on actual costs for recent similar works
in order to achieve accurate cost estimations
RED: No unit cost OR unit cost more than 50%
higher than proposed cost

ARAMP ARAMP
proposed actual unit
unit cost cost
Activity Unit (NPR) (NPR)
Dragging 2 100 100
m
Grading m2 300 300
Regravelling m2 600 600
Resealing m2 1,000 1,000
Surface dressing 2 1,500 1,500
m
Overlay 2 2,000 2,000
m
Road markings km 10,000 10,000
Painting steel parts m2 60 60
Table 3.4.3 Estimated costs for periodic maintenance

The estimated costs are calculated automatically on the basis of tables 3.4.1 and 3.4.2. Traffic data is
copied from table A1.2 (make sure the traffic data is entered in that table before ranking). Rank the
table by clicking the arrow at the top of the "Cost/vehicle" column and selecting "Sort A to Z"
RED: Cost not in line with volumes and unit rates OR total cost estimate not equal to sum OR no
traffic data available OR table not ranked by cost per vehicle
Dragging (NPR)

Road markings
Existing length

annual vehicle
Grading (NPR)

Overlay (NPR)

Painting steel

Traffic (VPD)
Regravelling

Total costs
Resealing

dressing
Surface
(NPR)

(NPR)

(NPR)

(NPR)

(NPR)

(NPR)

(NPR)
Cost/
parts
(km)

# Code
Total - - - - - - - - - -
1 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
6 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
9 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
10 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
11 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
13 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
14 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
15 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
16 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
17 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
18 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
19 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
20 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
21 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
22 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
23 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
24 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
25 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Table 3.5.1 Estimated maintenance costs (NPR)
This overview is generated automatically based on
previous tables

Routine + Recurrent
Existing length

Emergency

Periodic
Specific
(NPR)

(NPR)

(NPR)

(NPR)

(NPR)
Total
(km)

# Code - - - - - -
1 - - - - - - -
2 - - - - - - -
3 - - - - - - -
4 - - - - - - -
5 - - - - - - -
6 - - - - - - -
7 - - - - - - -
8 - - - - - - -
9 - - - - - - -
10 - - - - - - -
11 - - - - - - -
12 - - - - - - -
13 - - - - - - -
14 - - - - - - -
15 - - - - - - -
16 - - - - - - -
17 - - - - - - -
18 - - - - - - -
19 - - - - - - -
20 - - - - - - -
21 - - - - - - -
22 - - - - - - -
23 - - - - - - -
24 - - - - - - -
25 - - - - - - -
 #

25
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Code
Existing length
(km)

-
Rehabili-tation
(km)

-
Gravelling (km)

-
Black-topping
(km)

-
Table 4.1.1 DTMP improvement works

Widening (m)
-
Bridge
(m)
-

Slab culvert (m)

-

CC Causeway (m)
-
enter "C" if completed and "I" if initiated (but not completed).

Stone Causeway
(m)
-

Pipe culvert
(units)
-

Masonry walls
(m3)
-

Gabion walls
(m3)
-

Lined drain
(m)
-

Raising embank-
ment
(m3)
-

Realign-ment
(m)
-

DTMP estimated
total cost
-

(NPR '000)
Population served
(#)
-

DTMP estimated
cost per 1000
people
This table should be filled in using data from the DTMP report (no changes or adjustments should be made). In the status column,

(NPR)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Status
Table 4.1.2 ARAMP improvement works
Data from table 4.1.1 is entered here for roads where improvement works have not yet been completed,
adjusting for volumes of work already completed
RED: Volumes exceed the volumes listed in the DTMP OR DTMP ranking changed

Blacktopping (km)

CC Causeway (m)

Raising embank-
Stone Causeway
Slab culvert (m)
Gravelling (km)
Existing length

Masonry walls
Rehabilitation

Widening (m)

Realign-ment
Gabion walls
Pipe culvert

Lined drain
Bridge (m)

(units)

ment
(m3)

(m3)
(km)

(km)

(m3)
(m)

(m)

(m)
# Code - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
14 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
16 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
19 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
22 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
23 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
25 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Table 4.1.3 Unit costs for improvement (NPR)
These unit costs need to be entered based on actual
costs for recent similar works in order to achieve
accurate cost estimations
RED: No unit cost OR unit cost more than 50% higher
than DTMP unit cost
Activity Unit DTMP ARAMP ARAMP
unit cost proposed actual
(NPR) unit cost unit cost
(NPR) (NPR)

Rehabilitation km 3,000,000 3,000,000

Gravelling km 2,200,000 2,200,000
Blacktopping km 5,700,000 5,700,000
Widening m 2,000 2,000
Bridge construction m 1,200,000 1,200,000
Slab culvert m 150,000 150,000
construction
CC Causeway m 100,000 100,000
construction
Stone Causeway m 10,000 10,000
construction
Pipe culvert placement unit 10,000 10,000

Masonry wall m3 10,000 10,000

construction
Gabion wall 3 2,500 2,500
m
construction
Lined drain m 1,000 1,000
construction
Raising embankment m3 60 60
Realignment m 4,000 4,000
Table 4.1.4 Estimated improvement costs (NPR '000)
These costs are calculated automatically based on tables 4..1.2 and 4.1.3. Ranking has already been carried
out in the DTMP
RED: Cost not in line with volumes and unit rates OR total cost estimate not equal to sum OR ranking different
from DTMP

Stone causeways
Rehabili-tation

Masonry walls
CC causeways
Black-topping

embankment
Gabion walls
Slab culverts

Realignment
Lined drains
Pipe culvert
(NPR '000)

(NPR '000)

(NPR '000)

(NPR '000)

(NPR '000)

(NPR '000)

(NPR '000)

(NPR '000)

(NPR '000)

(NPR '000)

(NPR '000)

(NPR '000)

(NPR '000)

(NPR '000)

(NPR '000)
Gravelling

Total cost
Widening

Bridges

Raising
# Code - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
14 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
16 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
19 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
22 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
23 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
25 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Table 4.2.1 DTMP construction works
This table should be filled in using data from the DTMP
report (no changes or adjustments should be made). In the
status column, enter "C" if completed and "I" if initiated (but
not completed).

DTMP estimated total cost

DTMP estimated cost per

Planned new length

Population served
Existing length

1000 people
(NPR '000)
Bridge

(NPR)
(km)

(km)

(m)

(#)

Status
# Code - - - - -
1 -
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 -
10 -
11 -
12 -
13 -
14 -
15 -
16 -
17 -
18 -
19 -
20 -
21 -
22 -
23 -
24 -
25 -
Table 4.2.2 ARAMP new
construction works
Data from table 4.2.1 is entered here
and adjusted for volumes of work
already completed
RED: Volumes exceed the volumes
listed in the DTMP OR DTMP ranking
changed
Planned new length
Existing length

Bridges
(km)

(km)

(m)

# Code - - -
1 - - - -
2 - - - -
3 - - - -
4 - - - -
5 - - - -
6 - - - -
7 - - - -
8 - - - -
9 - - - -
10 - - - -
11 - - - -
12 - - - -
13 - - - -
14 - - - -
15 - - - -
16 - - - -
17 - - - -
18 - - - -
19 - - - -
20 - - - -
21 - - - -
22 - - - -
23 - - - -
24 - - - -
25 - - - -
Table 4.2.3 Standard costs for new construction (NPR)
These standard costs need to be entered based on
actual costs for recent similar works in order to
achieve accurate cost estimations
RED: No unit cost OR unit cost more than 50% higher
than DTMP unit cost

ARAMP proposed
unit cost
unit cost

unit cost
ARAMP
Activity

actual
DTMP

(NPR)

(NPR)

(NPR)
Unit

Track opening km 6,000,000 6,000,000

Bridge construction m 1,200,000 1,200,000
Table 4.2.4 Estimated new
construction costs (NPR '000)
These costs are calculated
automatically based on tables
4.2.2 and 4.2.3
RED: Cost not in line with
volumes and unit rates OR total
cost estimate not equal to sum
Existing length

Opening up
(NPR '000)

(NPR '000)

(NPR '000)
Total cost
Bridges
(km)

Code
Total - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
Table 5.1.1 Financial resources (NPR)
This table should be filled with data from the DTMP report and data from the DDC
RED: Budget amounts are more than 25% higher or lower than the DTMP estimate OR
sum of ARAMP Prioritised Budget and Discretionary Budget does not add up to total road
sector budget OR ARAMP allocation
DTMP is less than 80%
DTMP Actual Allocation to Allocation to
estimated estimated road sector ARAMP Prioritised Discretionary
road sector DRCN budget Budget Budget
Funding source budget allocation (NPR) (NPR) (%) (NPR) (%)
0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0%
Total - - - - 0% - 0%
Table 5.1.2 ARAMP Prioritised Budget
allocation standards (NPR/km)
Fill in the allocation standards (NPR/km) for
maintenance
RED: Allocation standard is less than 90% of
the proposed standard Proposed Actual
allocation allocation
standard standard
Maintenance type (NPR/km) (NPR/km)
Emergency maintenance 25,000 25,000
Routine maintenance 20,000 20,000
Recurrent maintenance (BT) 100,000 100,000
Recurrent maintenance (GR) 30,000 30,000
Recurrent maintenance (ER) 20,000 20,000
Specific maintenance 200,000 200,000
Periodic maintenance (BT) 400,000 400,000
Periodic maintenance (GR) 250,000 250,000
Table 5.1.3 ARAMP Prioritised Budget allocations (NPR)

The ARAMP Prioritised Budget allocations for maintenance and

improvement/construction are automatically calculated
RED: Budget allocations are not in line with the ARAMP Prioritised
Budget and the allocation standards
Allocation ARAMP Prioritised
Existing requirement Budget allocation
Maintenance type length (km) (NPR) (NPR)
Emergency maintenance - - -
Routine maintenance - - -
Recurrent maintenance (BT) - - -
Recurrent maintenance (GR) - - -
Recurrent maintenance (ER) - - -
Specific maintenance - - -
Periodic maintenance (BT) - - -
Periodic maintenance (GR) - - -
ARAMP allocation to maintenance -
ARAMP allocation to improvement and new construction -
Table 5.2.1 ARAMP investment plan (NPR '000)
This table will generate the data automatically. The amounts in the orange cells are filled in automatically, but can be adjusted to change the allocation (applying a different ranking)
RED: Allocation not equal to cost estimate or available budget (in order of ranking) OR total allocation for intervention type greater than available budget

New construction
Prioritised Budget

Prioritised Budget

Prioritised Budget

Prioritised Budget

Prioritised Budget

Prioritised Budget
Available Routine/Recurre

Improvement
maintenance

Discretionary

Discretionary

maintenance

Discretionary

maintenance

Discretionary

Discretionary

Discretionary
Emergency

Periodic
Specific
ARAMP

ARAMP

ARAMP

ARAMP

ARAMP

ARAMP
Budget

Budget

Budget

Budget

Budget

Budget
nt
Estimated (NPR '000)

Estimated (NPR '000)

Estimated (NPR '000)

Estimated (NPR '000)

'000)

Estimated (NPR '000)

Available

Available

Available

Available

Available
-

-
(NPR
Road code

Road code

Road code

Road code

Road code

Road code
Allocation

Allocation

Allocation

Allocation

Allocation

Allocation

Allocation

Allocation

Allocation

Allocation

Allocation

Allocation
Estimated
cost

cost

cost

cost

cost

cost
1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
14 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
16 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
19 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
22 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
23 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
25 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total - - - Total - - - Total - - - Total - - - Total - - - Total - - -
Remaining - - Remaining - - Remaining - - Remaining - - Remaining - - Remaining - -
Table 5.2.2 Road sector budget allocation (NPR)
This table will automatically generate the data from
Table 5.2.1.
RED: The total ARAMP Prioritized Budget is not in equal
to Table 5.1.1 OR the total Discretionary Budget is not
equal to Table 5.1.1

Amount (NPR)
Budget type

ARAMP Prioritised Budget (DRCN maintenance) -

ARAMP Prioritised Budget (DRCN improvement) -
ARAMP Prioritised Budget (DRCN construction) -
ARAMP Prioritised Budget (remaining) -
ARAMP Discretionary Budget (DRCN) -
Non-ARAMP Discretionary Budget (SRN + VRCN) -
Total road sector budget -
Table 5.2.3 ARAMP investment plan by road (NPR '000)
This table will automatically generate the data. Road codes will be added from Table
2.2.1 (including existing and planned roads). For each road the funding source to be
used should be entered. In case of multiple funding sources being used, the type of
intervention funded by each funding source should be mentioned in brackets:
Emergency Maintenance - EM; Routine/Recurrent Maintenance - RM; Specific
Maintenance - SM; Periodic Maintenance - PM;
Improvement Works - IW; New Construction - NC
RED: The sum of allocations is not equal to Table 5.2.1
Routine/ recurrent

New construction

Funding source
Improvement
Emergency

(NPR '000)

(NPR '000)

(NPR '000)
Road code

(NPR '000)

(NPR '000)

(NPR '000)

(NPR '000)
Periodic
Specific

Total
#

1 - - - - - - - -
2 - - - - - - - -
3 - - - - - - - -
4 - - - - - - - -
5 - - - - - - - -
6 - - - - - - - -
7 - - - - - - - -
8 - - - - - - - -
9 - - - - - - - -
10 - - - - - - - -
11 - - - - - - - -
12 - - - - - - - -
13 - - - - - - - -
14 - - - - - - - -
15 - - - - - - - -
16 - - - - - - - -
17 - - - - - - - -
18 - - - - - - - -
19 - - - - - - - -
20 - - - - - - - -
21 - - - - - - - -
22 - - - - - - - -
23 - - - - - - - -
24 - - - - - - - -
25 - - - - - - - -
Total - - - - - - -
Percentage 0% 0% 0% 0%
Table 5.3.1 Output
This table will automatically generate the data based on
table 5.2.2
New
Maintenance Gravelling Blacktopping
construction
(km) (km) (km)
# Code (km)
1 - - - - -
2 - - - - -
3 - - - - -
4 - - - - -
5 - - - - -
6 - - - - -
7 - - - - -
8 - - - - -
9 - - - - -
10 - - - - -
11 - - - - -
12 - - - - -
13 - - - - -
14 - - - - -
15 - - - - -
16 - - - - -
17 - - - - -
18 - - - - -
19 - - - - -
20 - - - - -
21 - - - - -
22 - - - - -
23 - - - - -
24 - - - - -
25 - - - - -
Total - - - -
Table 5.4.1 Level of Access
VDC and population data should be copied from the DTMP Report or previous ARAMP
Reports. Indicate the level of access of each VDC with an "X". Each row should have
two X's, one for the existing before situation and one for the expected after situation.
RED: If more than 2 or less than 2 X's are present in a row OR if no population data is
entered for a VDC

Before situation (existing before After situation (expected after

VDC/municipality

ARAMP) ARAMP)
Population

Direct access to

Direct access to
Fair-weather

Fair-weather
DRCN access

DRCN access

DRCN access

DRCN access
All-weather

All-weather
No access

No access
to DRCN

to DRCN
SRN

SRN
#
Total population -
- - - - - - - -
Total
VDCs/municipalities - - - - - - - - -
1
2
3

4
5
6

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Table 5.4.2 DRCN characteristics
This Table indicates the impact of the ARAMP in terms of DRCN and
access for local VDC HQs and their residents

All-weather
Total length Fair-weather All-weather gravel blacktop

km km % km % km %
Start of
ARAMP - - 0% - 0% - 0%
End of
ARAMP - - 0% - 0% - 0%
Difference - - 0% - 0% - 0%

Table 5.4.3 Population with access to road network

This Table indicates the impact of the ARAMP in terms of DRCN and access for local VDC HQs and their
residents. It requires table 5.4.1 to be filled in.
Direct access to SRN All-weather core roads Fair-weather core roads No access to road
VDCs Population % VDCs Population % VDCs Population % VDCs Population %
Start of
ARAMP - - 0% - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
End of
ARAMP - - 0% - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Difference - - 0% - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Table A1.1 - Weights of
vehicle categories
Weights should not be
changed

Type Weight
Motorcycle 0.5
Car-Jeep- Minibus 1
Tractor 2
Truck-Bus 4
Table A1.2 - Traffic volumes

Data should be copied from the DTMP or previous ARAMPs and updated where
possible
RED: Traffic data not entered for existing road, or traffic volume is zero (to be
confirmed in ARAMP report)

Motorcycle

Truck-Bus
Car-Jeep-
Total

Minibus

Tractor
Length
# Code Description (km) PCU VPD
1 - 0 - - -
2 - 0 - - -
3 - 0 - - -
4 - 0 - - -
5 - 0 - - -
6 - 0 - - -
7 - 0 - - -
8 - 0 - - -
9 - 0 - - -
10 - 0 - - -
11 - 0 - - -
12 - 0 - - -
13 - 0 - - -
14 - 0 - - -
15 - 0 - - -
16 - 0 - - -
17 - 0 - - -
18 - 0 - - -
19 - 0 - - -
20 - 0 - - -
21 - 0 - - -
22 - 0 - - -
23 - 0 - - -
24 - 0 - - -
25 - 0 - - -
- Total -