May 15, 2007

Bruce

Obviously, I didn't present the situation very well, for the Lawyer Files #s
1, 2 and 3 are......and are not what this is all about.

It is about many criminal acts, first fraud over $100,000 by my former

tenant and then it evolves into government corruption and conspiracy in
matters of the Constitution Act, 1982, which reveals a conspiracy which I
have documented irrefutably to the Attorney General, Michael Bryant.

This could very well be one of the most interesting and published case in
the history of the Democracy of Canada as it affects the Charter rights of
every individual in Canada.

The story begins on June 30 2005 at an ORHT hearing where I had filed to
evict my former tenant Don Wilson for failing to vacate my basement
apartment as per a May 6 2005 agreement to do so on May 31 2005.

He is the president and CEO of a company called “BioSafe Natural

Technologies Inc.” which I had initially invested in back in January 2003.

I decided to invest quite substantially in the company so I suggested Don

move into my basement free for 6 months so he could apply himself full time
to research and development, which he did on February 1 2004.

On February 11 2004 I invested a total of $65,000 and over the next 1 ½

years caused many friends to invest and I had also loaned him $10,000 via 3
promissory notes.

It is a bit of a long story but the bottom line is when the six free months
rent were up he agreed to pay me $800 a month from there on and after one
disappointment after another I decided to evict Don and he signed the April
13 2005 agreement to do so on May 31 2005 and on May 6 2005 he signed
another agreement which amended the April 13 2005.

He also signed to confirm that he owed me approximately $10,000 in back

rent.

The agreement also dealt with other matters regarding the BioSafe shares I
owned as well as my friends and those of the people who invested prior to me
coming on board.

At the June 30 2005 ORHT hearing Don committed the crime of Fraud well over
$100,000 with regards to the April 13 2005 and May 6 2005 agreements where
he denied having ever seen them or signed them.

The fact is he had used a different signature for these two agreements than
he has on all the other documents he had signed for me so obviously he had
signed these agreements for criminally fraudulent purpose which I may have
never known for years down the road when I tried to cash in on my
investment.

The other matter which I have detailed in the Lawyer Files #s 1-3 are with
regard to the dispute he filed with ORHT dated June 10 2005 which was
completely fabricated which stated through some verbal agreement he had with
me in matters of shares I had agreed that he was paid up rent until February
2009.

The fact is this was a completely different story than what the agreements
showed that he had signed with a phony signature.

My mother had witnessed the May 6t 2005 but she wasn’t there to attest to it
but the fellow that witnessed the April 13 2005 was and he did attest to the
fact that Don Wilson did sign that one.

I went on to provide all the pertinent evidence to prove every statement in

Don Wilson’s dispute which he had signed and filed with the ORHT was false
and misleading information which is an offense under s.206(1)of the Tenant
Protection Act, 1997.

When the judicator Nancy Fahlgren caught on as to what was happening I said,
“There otta be a law” and she said “There is” and went on for a minute or
two stating how she has the authority to forward it onto the Investigations
and Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing but I
never did get assurance that she would do so.

At the end of the hearing that day I asked what that object was beside her
and said “Is that a ……” when Nancy interrupted saying “Yes, it’s a recorder”
and I asked about getting a copy and she said yes after the hearing of
course.

The second day of the hearing July 28 2005 Nancy announced there would not
be a recorder that day which I didn’t give to much thought about at the
time.

On August 10 2005 I received the Tribunal order TNL-67103 by mail dated

August 8 2005 which found for me and Don was ordered to vacate my premises
before or by August 18 2005 and pay me the $10,000 he owes me.
****************************************************************************
*****************
Now comes the criminal part which I need a criminal lawyer to address which
involves various personnel of various levels of government who I have
written and corresponded with since August 2005 in an endeavor to have Don
Wilson appropriately charged for the crimes he committed.

The first 3 Lawyer Files were sent to the pertinent government personnel
regarding these crimes which were my final effort to have them act
responsibly in these matters and commence appropriate proceedings with
regards to matters under the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 and other matters
relative to the inconsistency of the Act with the Constitution Act, 1982.

I should note that I have been corresponding with personnel of various

levels of government who mostly have declined to respond and those who did
were completely incoherent to the facts and the issues I addressed so much
so that gave me cause to realize there was something bigger going on than
the relatively simple matter of the crimes that Don committed.
****************************************************************************
*****************
It is however, imperative that you are coherent to the fact that the above
crimes were committed and that the evidence contained within the Toronto Sun
document dated October 8 2006 is irrefutable to that endeavor which you will
know upon perusing it.

Once this is firmly in your mind you will see what I mean about the
responses I got from Rick Hennessey, Regional Manager of the ORHT, Dave
Grech, coordinator of the Investigations and Enforcement unit of the
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing and eventually from the Minister
himself, Hon. John Gerretsen.
****************************************************************************
*****************

Upon being coherent to the fact that these people are responding
irrationally, and when you add in to the stew the fact that the recording of
the first day of the hearing was tampered with in as much as the part which
I said “There otta be a law” and Nancy’s approximately 1 ½ minute response
were missing from the recording as was the part where she confirmed it was a
recorder at the end of the day was missing, you get somewhat suspicious.

When you consider the second and final day of the hearing July 28 2005 was
not recorded it gets most convincing that something is up and when you see
the responses of the Ombudsman and the York Regional Police, the RCMP and
the Ontario Civilian Commission On Police Services you will be bewildered.

When you see the “Role of the Attorney General” which I downloaded from his
web site everything will be clear as can be that the Attorney General is
behind it all due to the fact he wears one too many hats in that he is
responsible to ensure the provincial laws and the administration of justice
is consistent with the Constitution and he is the “guardian of the-rule of
law- which protects the individuals rights and society as a whole” which the
evidence I have accumulated proves that he has been more than negligent in
these matters.

On May 10 2007 I watched Peter Komos, MPP on the Legislature channel allege
certain improprieties of the Attorney General which support that which I
allege.

To expand on this I have attached a few documents.

One I sent to most of the Senators individually and the documents I sent are
attached and
Two the document I sent to Peter Kormos after hearing his allegations about
the Attorney General.

If you should be interested, let me know I will send you the Toronto Sun
documented to prove irrefutably the initial crimes by Don Wilson were
committed which is the foundation of the principal criminal matters
involving the government personnel which I want you to pursue.

I will also send you the 15 Lawyer Files and what ever else you may desire
to make your decision as to whether or not to go forth with this endeavor.

Respectfully

Frank Gallagher
PS

I have decided to forward you the letter to the Toronto Sun dated October 8
2006 and the 15 Lawyer Files perchance they may help you in your decision.

Please take all the time you need to make this, what must be a most
difficult decision considering the enormity of the ramifications attached to
the challenge.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce McChesney [mailto:dbrucelaw@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 12:48 PM
To: franklyone@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Obstruction of Justice: LFs 1-3

Mr. Gallagher,
I have recieved your email. Unfortunately my practice is restricted to
Criminal Law. I have never delt with Landlord and Tennant issues and would
not be competent to represent you in connection with your problem. I suggest
that you consult the Upper Canada Law Society Lawyer Referral Service which
lists lawyers and their areas of practice.
I wish you the best of luck with this matter.
McChesney

>From: "Frank Gallagher" <franklyone@hotmail.com>

>To: <dbrucelaw@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Obstruction of Justice: LFs 1-3
>Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 01:31:05 -0400
>
>May 8, 2007
>
>D. Bruce McChesney
>302-30 Prospect Street
>Newmarket, On
>L3Y 3S9
>
>dbrucelaw@hotmail.com
>
>
>
>Please peruse the attachments and when you are confident the facts are as I
>state, which you should and must be after reading the letter to the Toronto
>Sun dated October 8 2006, which contains the pertinent evidence submitted
at the Tribunal hearing June 30 2005.
>I would appreciate you scheduling an appointment so we can move swiftly on
>to other subsequent matters relevant to the issues I have addressed at this
>point which evolved in my endeavor to resolve these issues.
>
>Upon receiving your e-mail that you have set aside some time for me, I am
>available any time at your immediate convenience; I will forward copies of
>Lawyer Files # s 4-14 and 13A for you to give a quick look at so you will
>be up to speed when we meet.
>
>Perhaps a little more time than the normal allotted would be prudent to set
>aside.
>
>
>Thank you,
>
>Frank Gallagher
>
>PS
>
>Letter to Toronto Sun dated October 8 2006 will follow in 2 Parts under
>separate covers.

><< ProspectiveLawyerMay82007.doc >>

><< LawyerFile_1.doc >>

><< LawyerFile_2.doc >>

><< LawyerFile_3.doc >>