From: Ombudsman for Victims of Crime - Ombudsman des victimes d'actes criminel

[mailto:victimsfirst@ombudsman.gc.ca]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 4:30 PM
To: franklyone@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Victim due to government corruption and conspiracy

The Office of the Federal Ombudsman for Victims of Crime has reviewed your E-mails
sent September 20, 2007, and attached documents.

The mandate of the Office of the Federal Ombudsman for Victims of Crime is limited to
issues affecting victims of crime exclusively within federal responsibility. Secondly, our
office is unable to review any complaints or matters relating to occurrences prior to the
establishment of our office in March 2007.

We understand that the issues you raise are of a serious nature, however as your
complaint falls under Provincial Jurisdiction and occurred prior to March 2007, we are
unable to assist you in these matters.

Office of the Federal Ombudsman for Victims of Crime

P.O. Box 55037

240 Sparks Street
Ottawa, ON K1P 1A1

1-866-481-8429
www.victimsfirst.gc.ca

From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:franklyone@hotmail.com]

Sent: 2007-Sep-20 10:53 PM
To: Ombudsman for Victims of Crime - Ombudsman des victimes d'actes criminel
Subject: Victim due to government corruption and conspiracy

September 20, 2007

Steve Sullivan
Federal Ombudsman
victimsfirst@ombudsman.gc.ca

I am quite aware of your limitations regarding government corruption and conspiracy for they
would hardly authorize you to bring them to justice and just as likely would they hardly appoint
you if you weren’t on side with them. (Sorry, but I have been at this for 2 years with justice just as
elusive)
However I request you review the attachments “Federal Ombudsman…….” and Sun Editor (Part
1). The rest of the 73 page letter to follow as Part 2 to get the gist of the corruption.

It is imperative that you study these documents until you are coherent to the fact that Dave
Grech, Coordinator of Investigations and Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and
Housing has refused to perform his duty in accordance with the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 or
conducive and consistent with the Constitution Act, 1982 in particular with due respect to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

To this endeavor I will also forward you a copy of “Dave Grech compiled correspondence
September 1 2007 “ and Lawyer Files #s 1-3

I have a prodigious amount of evidence in support of all that I allege including the remainder of 15
Lawyer Files which I will send next week.

I can not over emphasize the importance of your attentiveness to the studying of these
preliminary documents until you are confident that Dave Grech was negligent of his duties by
refusing to commence proceedings against Don Wilson my former tenant.

Thank you in advance

Frank Gallagher

PS

This eventually links to the DOJ as did the RCMP pension fund scandal which the powers that be
stopped an inquiry flat in its tracks as it was obviously hot on their trail.
The York Regional Police, the OPP Anti-Rackets and the RCMP are into this up to their necks,
which inevitably lead to the powers that be who appoint the upper echelon.

It is prudent to mention that one senator is reviewing my concerns and another has forwarded it
on to the Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change in the RCMP.

Obviously this all puts somewhat of a challenge on your integrity.

I am dedicated to getting this to a public inquiry one way or another and should that occur I
recommend you keep your records in order.

Given that you all are authorized positions under the Constitution Act, 1982 and are required by
law to be consistent with it I recommend that you do what is right conducive and consistent
with it.

You are purportedly independent of the government presumably acting on behalf of all the people
but I also presume you are a lawyer and a member of The Law Society of Upper Canada who
has stated or implied in their correspondence to me on a completely separate issue that their
members only concern it to advance their clients interests with no concern about the guaranteed
Charter rights of the individual.

That kind of explains a lot since the whole legal system is operated by lawyers who act in conflict
of interest of the people of Canada who finance them.

I would like to remind you who your client is. The people who actually pay your way.

There is two ways of looking at this depending on where your loyalty is.

Perhaps you will have to argue that out.

Perhaps you can wait like I must to see how you respond to the issues.

May I suggest that “They won’t let me do what is right” is not particularly a good response
however you could expand on that if an inquiry makes it to the public.

“To see what is right and not do it, is want of courage, or of principle”

It’s easy for Confucius to say.