Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Lily Downs
Ms. Gardner
English 10 H/Period 4
2 May 2017
ethically costly. It has become a widespread topic, invoking questions due to the violation of
ethics and the price we pay to kill. Capital punishment must stop: It expenses the government,
tears families apart, and sets a negative example for the rest of the world.
Some people agree with the death penalty--if someone kills another person they deserve
the same fate. People who support capital punishment believe criminals dig their own grave by
committing a crime deserving of the death penalty, therefore they should be murdered for their
wrongs. According to David Von Drehle of Time magazine, capital punishment serves three
main purposes. First, there are not enough secure prisons to house violent criminals for long
periods of time. Secondly, although discredited by time the death penalty was a way of
showing white supremacy (setting an example for slave uprisings). And the third point is what
Drehle describes as a visceral and compelling force--justice. The Time editor and author says,
Its the force that has kept the death penalty going as long as it has (Drehle). However, does
this law allow the disturbed murderers a chance to become a better person? Most people who
have killed another person have gone through great hardships, have not been shown the love all
humans deserve. And by sentencing them to death, we are affirming their exaggerated belief that
One substantial downside of capital punishment is the cost. The Death Penalty
Information Center states that for each case in which the death penalty is sought it costs $1.26
million. Investing this execution money into a different cause, such as counselling, would be
more beneficial to society. Imagine the message it would send if all murderers turned into the
kindest people in the world, if we gave even the worst people a second chance. It would show
there is hope for anyone and everyone. The Death Penalty is state based not nation wide, so state
legislators have the power to sentence criminals who have committed capital crimes such as
murder (Cornell University Law School)-- Clearly, even with modern advancements, the death
penalty is inherently flawed. U.S. government officials often say their hands are tied, since this is
a matter largely decided by state law (Heleringer). So Capital punishment, believed to benefit
society, is actually detrimental due to its high cost. Ceasing the death penalty is vital because we
should not be spending money on ending human lives, especially those who need our help.
Growing up, we are taught to hurt no living thing. Killing an individual, no matter what the
circumstances, is a serious, grueling, and complex matter. That is why it is against societys
rules and ethics to kill someone. According to Courier Journal, If a society that calls itself
civilized has any legitimate claim to that status and believes sincerely in the sanctity of all human
life as unique and precious in the eyes of God it simply cannot also enforce and carry out the
executions of human beings for crimes committed (Heleringer). Meaning, if we, as a society,
consider ourselves civil human beings, we would not find murder to be a solution to a crime. If
murder is what we are trying to stop, whats the point of executing people? In addition, there is
such a thing as aggravating factors--Aspects of the crime, of the defendant, or of the victim(s)
Downs 3
which render the defendant eligible for either the death penalty or life in prison without the
possibility of parole (Findlaw) that play a part in sentencing. In summation, the circumstances
of the murder are investigated and considered while the criminal is sentenced. However, to
justify th the death penalty is to justify murder. Capital punishment is highly unethical, therefore
it should be illegal.
Yes, some say capital punishment could have a preventative effect on criminals.
However, there is not enough research to support this idea, and instead of killing criminals, we
should be trying to help them learn and grow. To further prove this claim, University of
Colorado Professors, Michael Radelet and Traci Lacock recently conducted a study using people
who study crime: criminologists. They discovered that 88% of the nations leading
criminologists do not believe the death penalty is an effective deterrent to crime (Lacock,
Radelet). Not even the most intellectual individuals who study criminal behavior believe the
death penalty is an effective preventative measure. Jeff Jackoby, a journalist for The Globe,
argues: We do know for sure that when the cost of a crime goes up, the frequency of that crime
goes down. He also states that, When the death penalty is on the books and consistently
enforced, a significant number of homicides will be prevented (Jackoby). Jackoby may have a
point, that if Americans knew they could murder someone with little punishment, they would be
more likely to act on their homicidal impulses. But A) Without the death penalty, murderers still
face life imprisonment and B) How do we test his theory, how can he know that what he says is
the truth? Besides, Michael Radelet and Traci Lacocks research says otherwise. America should
not rip apart its families due to their faults. America should do everything it can to help those
individuals back into their families. Obviously, capital punishment leaves no room for criminals
Downs 4
to improve their values or motives so isn't it hypocritical to teach others to not do something by
In conclusion, the death penalty should be made illegal in all fifty states because it is not
only expensive and unethical, it is simply wrong. We need to put an end to a practice that is not
consistent with current knowledge about mental illness and fundamental principles of human
decency (Taft). Would you want your child murdered for killing someone? As Heleringer
inquires: Does killing the killers really honor the memories of those victims? What kind of
example does that teach our children - that our reaction to the most pernicious act carried out by
one human being upon another (the act of taking a life) is to take that person's life? Two wrongs
do not make a right. So why is killing someone for murder legal or okay? To end a human life
you must understand what life is, and how valuable it is. If someone has the capacity to end a
Works Cited
Drehle, David Von. Capital Punishment: The End of the Death Penalty. Time, Time, 8 June
2015,
http://time.com/deathpenalty/
Jacoby, Jeff. When Murder is Punished with Death, Fewer Criminals Will Murder Boston
Globe,
https://sks.sirs.com/webapp/article?artno=386414&type=ART
Heleringer, Bob. It's Time for Capital Punishment to Die. Courier-Journal. SIRS Issues
Researcher.
Lacock, T, and M Radelet. Study: 88% of Criminologists Do Not Believe the Death Penalty Is
University, 2017,
https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/study-88-criminologists-do-not-believe-death-penalty
-effective-deterrent
Schouten, Lucy. Why New Mexico Wants to Restore the Death Penalty Christian Science
Monitor,
http://sks.sirs.com/webapp/article?artno=385696&type=ART
Staff, LII. Death Penalty. LII / Legal Information Institute, 6 Aug. 2007,
Downs 6
www.law.cornell.edu/wex/death_penalty
Taft, Bob, and Joseph E. Kernan. End this Inhumane Punishment. Washington Post, SIRS
http://sks.sirs.com/webapp/article?artno=0000391937&type=ART
Costs of the Death Penalty. Costs of the Death Penalty | Death Penalty Information
https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/costs-death-penalty