Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1990.05:1745-1762. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.

com
by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY on 03/16/13. For personal use only.
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1990.05:1745-1762. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY on 03/16/13. For personal use only.
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1990.05:1745-1762. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY on 03/16/13. For personal use only.
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1990.05:1745-1762. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY on 03/16/13. For personal use only.
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1990.05:1745-1762. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY on 03/16/13. For personal use only.
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1990.05:1745-1762. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY on 03/16/13. For personal use only.
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1990.05:1745-1762. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY on 03/16/13. For personal use only.
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1990.05:1745-1762. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY on 03/16/13. For personal use only.
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1990.05:1745-1762. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY on 03/16/13. For personal use only.
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1990.05:1745-1762. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY on 03/16/13. For personal use only.
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1990.05:1745-1762. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY on 03/16/13. For personal use only.
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1990.05:1745-1762. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY on 03/16/13. For personal use only.
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1990.05:1745-1762. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY on 03/16/13. For personal use only.
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1990.05:1745-1762. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY on 03/16/13. For personal use only.
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1990.05:1745-1762. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY on 03/16/13. For personal use only.
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1990.05:1745-1762. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY on 03/16/13. For personal use only.
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1990.05:1745-1762. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY on 03/16/13. For personal use only.
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1990.05:1745-1762. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY on 03/16/13. For personal use only.
 This article has been cited by:

1. Adrian Kent. 2012. Real World Interpretations of Quantum Theory. Foundations of Physics 42:3, 421-435. [CrossRef]
2. Ed Seidewitz. 2011. Consistent Histories of Systems and Measurements inSpacetime. Foundations of Physics 41:7, 1163-1192.
[CrossRef]
3. Alastair I.M. Rae. 2009. Everett and the Born rule. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and
Philosophy of Modern Physics 40:3, 243-250. [CrossRef]
4. Meir Hemmo, Itamar Pitowsky. 2007. Quantum probability and many worlds. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B:
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38:2, 333-350. [CrossRef]
5. Robin D. Hanson. 2006. Driftdiffusion in mangled worlds quantum mechanics. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical,
Physical and Engineering Sciences 462:2069, 1619-1627. [CrossRef]
6. Maximilian Schlosshauer. 2006. Experimental motivation and empirical consistency in minimal no-collapse quantum mechanics.
Annals of Physics 321:1, 112-149. [CrossRef]
7. Milan M. irkovi. 2005. Physics versus Semantics: A Puzzling Case of the Missing Quantum Theory. Foundations of Physics
35:5, 817-838. [CrossRef]
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1990.05:1745-1762. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com

8. Wojciech Zurek. 2005. Probabilities from entanglement, Borns rule p_{k}=_{k}^{2} from envariance. Physical Review A 71:5. .
by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY on 03/16/13. For personal use only.

[CrossRef]
9. Maximilian Schlosshauer. 2005. Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics. Reviews of
Modern Physics 76:4, 1267-1305. [CrossRef]
10. Harold Ollivier, David Poulin, Wojciech Zurek. 2004. Objective Properties from Subjective Quantum States: Environment as a
Witness. Physical Review Letters 93:22. . [CrossRef]
11. Wojciech Hubert Zurek. 2003. Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Reviews of Modern Physics
75:3, 715-775. [CrossRef]
12. Wojciech Zurek. 2003. Environment-Assisted Invariance, Entanglement, and Probabilities in Quantum Physics. Physical Review
Letters 90:12. . [CrossRef]
13. Fay Dowker, Adrian Kent. 1996. On the consistent histories approach to quantum mechanics. Journal of Statistical Physics 82:5-6,
1575-1646. [CrossRef]
14. Max Tegmark. 1996. Does the universe in fact contain almost no information?. Foundations of Physics Letters 9:1, 25-41. [CrossRef]
15. Simon Saunders. 1995. Time, quantum mechanics, and decoherence. Synthese 102:2, 235-266. [CrossRef]
16. Simon Saunders. 1993. Decoherence, relative states, and evolutionary adaptation. Foundations of Physics 23:12, 1553-1585.
[CrossRef]