Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Introduction
People are taught to always follow a certain routine such as how to behave in public, eat
an ice cream or even go out to the movies. Then comes a point where there are people with
atypical behavior compared to others. Simple things such as people drastically changing their
emotions or trying to drink coffee with a fork is not normal. Porter (1986) once wrote, " A
through approved channels and whose discourse is regulated." Due to my interest in this kind of
strange behavior, I decided to learn more about the Abnormal Psychology Discourse
Community. This is a group of people who learn more about the bizarre thoughts, feelings, and
behavior in society. This group not only learns about mental illness, but also about people's
everyday random behavior. I decided to go into the Abnormal Psychology course at the
University in order to get an insight in this rare subject. This class was taught by Professor James
Literature Review
As mentioned above, a discourse community is a group of people that share the same
values and ideas for a certain subject or goal they have in common. There are all kinds discourse
groups in the world from school groups who share the same ideas to fitness communities. John
Swales was one of the main people involved in the idea of discourse communities wrote "The
Concept of Discourse Communities" which tells us more about the argument of what a discourse
community really is. In his article he mentioned that in order to be part of a discourse community
they had to follow six concepts. These concepts where that a discourse community has to agree
to a set of common public goals, have mechanisms of intercommunication among its members,
Running Head : ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY DISCOURSE 3
COMMUNITY
use participatory mechanisms to provide information and feedback, possesses certain genres they
must follow, acquired some specific lexis that only the group will understand, and have a
threshold level of members with a suitable degree of relevant content and discourse expertise
(Swales, 1990). They must follow all of these expectations in order for that specific group to be
classified as a discourse community. Apart from that, they must also have their own specific kind
of genre which are "types of texts that are recognizable to the readers and writers..."
(Swales,1990). This is important in order for the group to be able to understand each other in
their own specific way and for their audience to be able to distinguish that group. Just like James
Porter mentioned in 1986 article of "Intertextuality and the Discourse Community". He said "the
idea that all texts contain "traces" of other texts and that there can be no text that does not draw
on some ideas from some other texts (Porter, 1986). This can tie up to the idea of discourse
communities because this is a group of people with same goals that need each other's ideas in
Method
major in Psychology just like me. The purpose of this group is to learn about the way people
think, behave, and feel in society. I went a couple of Professor Wood's class on Abnormal
Psychology where I had the opportunity to get an insight of this group and met some of his
students that helped me discover this discourse community. I attended two class sessions on
Monday and Wednesday for an hour and twenty minutes each. I also did some private interviews
to some students and to the professor. Finally, I was able to participate in one of the research
studies that they were offering in the Psychology Department in order to understand what the
Discussion
The Abnormal Psychology class shares a common goal which is to understand and find
ways in order to help society get better and improve their strange behavior in their everyday life
as they go through moments or phases were they start to react in a different manner. Their goal is
to find ways to make connections through the actions of the people with the abnormal behavior
in order to find the problem, its causes, and a solution. Ana Mena, one of the students I
interviewed, said, "One of my main goals for this class is to understand the brain's unconscious
abnormal behavior as I prepare for my goal which is in the clinical psychology field of study",
(A. Mena, personal communication, March 1, 2017). As I attended one of the sessions I was able
to identify that most of the people there wanted to be part of the clinical field of study in
psychology, research, and even attend medical school. Ana mentioned that she enjoyed being
part of this group because she was with a "...group of people who understand my passion for the
subject and I know that I dont feel left out if I try to explain to them some of my thoughts and
ideas about the lectures and the research I do", (A. Mena, personal communication, March 1,
2017).
As I spent some of my days in the class, I was able to identify how the people
communicated there. They would usually have time to discuss one of the issues presented and
then the professor would make them interact with him. The students would turn and talk to the
person next to them as they would discuss their opinion about the subject. Professor Wood would
give his students a discussion post where all of the students had to answer and reply to at least
one of their colleagues. These where the method the group used in order for them to
communicate in the class. Apart from that, they had a specific type of terminology used in class
that all of the people there understood. They had some terms such as "somatoform disorders" or
Running Head : ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY DISCOURSE 5
COMMUNITY
"spontaneous remission" that are not likely to be understood by a regular person. Ana mentioned
that "the terminology was very confusing and somewhat difficult to learn since there were some
terms that sounded very similar", (A. Mena, personal communication, March 1, 2017). In order
for them to know the subject and learn what the course was about the students had to keep in
mind what the terms where because they knew they were going to be repeated throughout the
semester. This was one of the things that made this group unique and qualified to be part of a
discourse community.
In this group one of the most important things they need to do is attend and complete
twelve research hours throughout the semester. "One of the main requirements in this course is to
attend the research hours that help students get involve in class and help them learn through
different studies offered by the Psychology Department at the university" (J. Wood, personal
communication, March 3, 2017). Professor Wood told me that this requirement was different
than other classes at the university since they were trying show the students the research side of
the course. He mentioned that "it's not always about the lecture, a student needs to get experience
in the research department in order to get in depth and understand the processes of finding out
what causes abnormal behavior in society"(J. Wood, personal communication , March 3, 2017).
Professor Wood told me that if I was taking a Psychology course I could be part of the research
studies that the university offered. I decided to go for one research session in order to understand
what the students have to go through as they're part of that class. The study I did was called
"Friends in the Lab" where they studied the behavior of you and friend. The community would
post the research studies online, make posters about them, and even send emails to remind the
students of them. The community mostly used the posters around campus in order to let the other
Running Head : ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY DISCOURSE 6
COMMUNITY
students at the university know who they were and what they were doing with these studies. This
The type of writing they do are small paragraphs discussing the posts they have to answer
on blackboard. As I mentioned before, they answer a discussion question and then they have to
reply to one of their colleagues with their opinions about their answer. Most of the students have
their own notetaking strategy that helps them identify and write the main points of the lecture in
a very clear way since the concepts are sort of difficult. I asked one of the students if I could see
her notebook and I noticed that most of them would write the key points and a couple of words
that would remind them of the meaning. They said that this was effective for the class since there
I was able to identify the people who were "in" by talking to them. For example when I
sat next to a girl named Paulina Arroniz , I was able to distinguish her from other students
because of the way she spoke about the subject. Every time there was an opportunity for
interaction she would amaze me with her knowledge about "The Concepts of Psychotherapy",
which was the subject being discussed at the time. After class I interviewed her and she said that
the class made her look at the world from a different perspective since she was learning concepts
that she had never thought about. She said, "I hope that one day I can come back to campus and
help the other students understand what I learned from this class and how it can affect their
future. " (P. Arroniz, personal communication, March 1, 2017). I noticed that the group managed
to always have members since there are people who have to go back in order to help the
newcomers with their path. Paulina mentioned that she enjoys having group sessions with the
class in order to share and discuss the subject being presented. People like her are the ones you
know will always be part of the group as they want to try to spread the word about it.
Running Head : ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY DISCOURSE 7
COMMUNITY
Conclusion
because it follows Swale's six criteria in order to be classified as a discourse community. This
group was not only built based on this criteria , but also from the intertextuality the members
used in order to integrate the newcomers and build this discourse throughout the university. Just
like Porter (1986) once wrote ""intertextuality" means looking for... the bits and pieces of Text
which writers or speakers borrow and sew together to create new discourse." Without the idea of
intertextuality the people of the Abnormal Psychology group wouldn't have been considered part
of this discourse. I hope to one day be part of this group in order for me to also share their
References
Porter, J. (1986). Intertextuality and the discourse community. In E. Wardle & D. Downs (Eds.),
Writing about writing : A college reader (p. 395-405). Boston, MA : Bedford/St. Martin's
Swales, J. (1990). The concept of discourse community. In E. Wardle & D. Downs (Eds.), m
Writing about writing : A college reader (p. 212-227). Boston, MA : Bedford/St. Martin's