Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Chapter 1
Daharki, a barren isolated place was selected for the huge investment of
a highly complex urea fertilizer plant. Tony Ward Vice President, fertilizer
marketing was accompanied by Shaukat Mirza to under-take a grass
roots market survey to assess the size of the urea market. Essos decision
to invest in a fertilizer plant was driven primarily by its initial desire to
explore the Mari gas fields located nearby. Ayub Khan was also keen to
invite foreign investment in fertilizer manufacturing based on indigenous
gas.
The first construction activity involved building houses and offices at the
site. Due to harsh working conditions at the site the start-up was done by
a relay team of specialists, they would spend six weeks on site and six
weeks back in the US offices.
Before Essos entry into the fertilizer industry the processing of urea was
done in small scale plants in Multan and some urea was imported in
small quantities and distributed by the governments Agricultural
Department at highly subsidized prices. Farmers resisted the use of
chemical fertilizers including urea and Esso was therefore contracted
with the task of converting the mind-set of the farmers. The company
imported urea fertilizers before the plan start-up and mounted an
intensive sales promotion campaign. Esso decided to come out as a
separate wholly owned subsidiary and not make its investment part of
Esso Eastern Esso Pakistan Fertilizer Company Limited (EPFCL).
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Mirza was very much concerned about the welfare of the employees in
case there was a change of ownership of the business. He stressed
that ECPL Chief Executive should be taken into confidence and the
employees should be given a chance to purchase the company. He was
of the view that it would be best if Exxon continued to manage but if
they could not then the new owners must not rock the boat but let the
management philosophy and policies remain unchanged.
Mirza gave names of the IFC and ADB as potential parties that may be
interested in the equity purchase. He wrote to Morley Handford,
Worldwide Fertilizers Vice President, explaining why it was important
to take the employees morale into account and highlighted certain
areas that would require special discussions with the new shareholder
so that employees apprehensions are allayed (points on page 27, 28,
29).
Morley had also received a letter from Mirza where he had proposed a
contingency plan in which Exxons equity would be sold to IFC, ECPLs
Employee Trust, and local Stock Exchange.
Finally Mirza was given the charge to lead the buy-out and given a
letter of authorization to do so. This was the highest point in the
career of Shaukat Mirza.
Pg. 38-66
Chapter 4:
On returning from Brussels Mirza attended the Annual Marketing
Conference where he got an opportunity to start briefing the senior
managers about Exxons plan of divestment. While sharing a cable car,
Mirza took an opportunity to brief Zaffar Khan (VP Marketing) about the
discussions in Brussels:
IFC signed an agreement for providing their services. The after the
agreement the recommended options are:
Mirza, Zaffar Khan and Mahmud Dossa had a meeting to set the
objectives of the buy-out:
Chevron needed the site cleared by the end of 1991. In order to clear
the site we had to take approvals from shareholders, project financing
and government. Mirza planned to meet Morley late November to
report him that we needed to conclude Exxon and employee group
transactions so that we could work on signing agreements based on
sale value. We also needed some time for government approvals.
Chapter 5.
It was January 11 1991, the day when Mirza was appointed as CEO of
Employees group. Dream come true for Mirza, as he won the contract
of expansion ECPL project after successful negotiation with Morley.
IFC could make sure that all project financing and equity
adjustment protected ECPL interests.
IFC expected to receive management mandate in two weeks.
With regard to restructuring and Exxon equity 35% available
for placement out of which IFC would be willing to invest 10-15
% while the balance of 20-25 % IFC could place with general
public mostly with in Pakistan.
The proposed Exxon dilution plan of 29 September 1990 was:
Exxon 20%
ECPL Employees 20-25 %
IFC 10-15 %
AFI 10%
IDB 10%
15 % in KSE through private placement
Employee Trust was developed for the purpose of acquisition of Exxon
shares. The Employee Trust was established with the following charter;
Policy for ownership of shares was developed. The agreed terms are;
On 23 November Mirza called Declan and tell that Chevron had refused
to extend the option date. Declan asked Mirza if he would be willing to
consider the agha khan federation for 10-20% of equity.
IFC advised that the most credible feature was the employees own
involvement. Employees must buy a minimum of 30% for IFC to
participate. There was strong indication that IFC would be willing to take
15% of the equity.
From 66 98
Chapter 5
Jemal wanted to send a signal to Exxon for EPCL and IFC are in a
stage to put the package together by IFC strong declaration of intent
within 24hrs. However an offer letter to Exxon was sent with a price
of $2.12 (Payable at Rs. 21.90 per US dollar protected upto Rs.23).
Equity sharing was 39% Employee Group, 15% IFC and 30% others.
Stating that employee share would be purchased by employees group
or Trust with total remaining 30%. AFIC was to take 5-10% of equity
plus loan financing of 5 million. With conditions stated earlier. Letter
also proposed action planned towards closure in case project failure.
IFC faxed letter of support for EPCL investment with 30% employee
equity, 15% IFC equity, and 30% others (SCB and others). However
IFC reserved the right to align with other successful party incase later
loses their chance. However EG reserved the right to pass on the
letter of support from banks to Exxon.
Exxon had three options either to deal with every party individually or
with IFC as an additional one or to go with one partly in place. Hence a
proposal with a price of Rs. 46.50 per share was faxed. This proposal was
drafted in a meeting with IFC in washigton. Based on factors like:
IFC determined the price of each share at Rs. 39 per share. This could go
up by Rs. 2 if return is dropped to 15%. However with the expansion
project value per share was Rs. 45. Finally agreeing on Rs. 46.50 per
share. IFC insisted on five years retention of share with Employees
having 25.1% shares. With a right to seek commitment from rights issue
up-front from investor.