Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Andres Carrillo
English 11
11 October 2016
Stem cells were first thought of in the 1800s, scientists knew that there were cells that
created other cells. There were trials to fertilize a mammalian egg outside of a human body at the
start of the 1900s. Throughout the 1900s there were many discoveries of stem cells being found
in the human body and numerous other animals. However, the discovery that had the most
impact was in 1997 when a scientist by the name Keith Campbell cloned a sheep from stem cells.
From then on stem cell research was tainted with debate and controversy. Scientists
experimented with adult mouse tissues because they can produce different cell types. This
allowed them to believe that cells from bone marrow could do the same as adult mouse tissues.
In 1968 the first successful bone marrow transplant happened to a child patient that was suffering
from an immune deficiency. The doctors name was Robert A. Good from the University of
Minnesota. In 1998, Thompson, from the University of Wisconsin, isolated cells from the inner
cell mass of early embryos and developed the first embryonic stem cell lines. During that exact
same year, Gearhart, from Johns Hopkins University, derived germ cells from cells in fetal gonad
tissue; pluripotent stem cell lines were developed from both sources. Then, in 1999 and 2000,
scientists discovered that manipulating adult mouse tissues could produce different cell types.
This meant that cells from bone marrow could produce nerve or liver cells and cells in the brain
could also yield other cell types. These discoveries were exciting for the field of stem cell
Carrillo2
research, with the promise of greater scientific control over stem cell differentiation and
proliferation.
In recent years new scientific methods and understandings have led to an explosion of
interest in stem-cell research. This is so because stem cells can generate a huge variety of cells
vitally important for the blood, brain, various organs, and neurological system. These
potentialities raise the possibility of intervention or cure in the treatment of cancer, Parkinsons
auto-immune syndromes, spinal-cord injury, burns, arthritis and other medical problems.
There are two kinds of stem cells. Adult stem cells are multi-potent. They travel from the
bone marrow to a variety of sites where they can replace damaged tissue. A recent experiment in
Japan, for example, showed that stem cells sprayed into damaged heart chambers had the
capacity to lead to the heart tissues repairing themselves in a way that no other treatment has
been able to accomplish. These adult stem cells are somewhat differentiated, with at least three
kinds of stem cells to be found in bone marrow. When they are separated from the rest of the
marrow, they can be used more effectively and safely in bone marrow replacement as part of
cancer treatment. The research done on adult stem cells has been relatively free of serious ethical
issues. The adult stem cells can be harvested with patient consent and more commonly can be
taken from bodies donated for medical research. Because of the absence of ethical problems,
most of the current research is being done on adult stem cells. When an adults stem cells are
used as an aid to healing for that persons own body, this avoids the issues of tissue rejection that
may still need to be overcome in the use of stem cells in the treatment of other people.
The second category of stem cells is embryonic cells. They are plural-potent (many-
potentiated) in that they can become any cell in the body. If embryonic cells were used in the
Carrillo3
treatment of another human being, the issue of fusion and tissue match with the host would need
to be overcome, but embryonic cells are very attractive as a basis for research because of their
There are several sources of embryonic cells. They can be taken from umbilical cords and
uterine baby water. The advantage of this method is that there are no moral issues regarding the
source of the cells. Because the cells can provide a tissue match for the infant with which they
are associated, some people are actually freezing the cords in order to make it possible to obtain
genetically matching embryonic cells later if research should become sufficiently sophisticated to
make that useful and the child or adult should ever need those cells.
A second source of embryonic cells is fetuses. When a fetus is aborted, stem cells can be
harvested without difficulty. The only ethical danger here is the somewhat hard to imagine
possibility that a woman might become convinced to become pregnant so that her fetus could be
aborted for the sake of harvesting stem cells. While this would raise serious moral problems, it is
By far the most common source of embryonic stem cells is embryos that have been created as
part of an assisted reproduction program. Currently when couples are attempting to become
pregnant through assisted implantation of an embryo, eggs are harvested and fertilized, a group
of embryos is created, and only a few of them are implanted. The rest are frozen and retained by
the clinic for use at a later time in order to avoid having to do unnecessary additional harvesting.
Once it is certain that these embryos will not be needed, they are usually unceremoniously
discarded. That being the case, there is no moral reason why they cannot be used for research.
Carrillo4
The hope is that one day stem cells can be used to cure many types of cancers. It
impossible to predict what scientific and political developments will occur in the future,
however, this is the goal of many researchers. To answer your question--YES. Stem cells can,
and in fact do right now, cure cancer. Currently, stem cell transplants are a widely used therapy
for a few types of cancers. A stem cell cancer is a possible treatment for types of leukemia and
lymphomas (both are blood cancers). The procedure is fraught with difficulties but works.
Essentially what happens--the patient is given high dose chemotherapy and / or radiation therapy
to kill as many of the cancer cells as possible. The chemotherapy also clears out the bone marrow
to make room for new stem cells, which are then injected into the patient. The stem cells are
collected from healthy donors or even umbilical cords from healthy baby donors. The new stem
cells then find a home in the marrow. These cells then attack the cancer cells that they see as
foreign--thereby "curing" the patient of the cancer. There are many complications that can occur-
-but it is currently a successful process that is used. As for it this will ever work for solid cancers,
like stomach cancer--this is the hope. Research is actively being done in this area. I encourage
you to discuss your questions with your father's oncologist. This answer is for general
informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. If you think
you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or (in the United States) 911 immediately.
Always seek the advice of your doctor before starting or changing treatment.
Stem cells are expected to dramatically improve the ability of drug companies to screen
new drugs for side effects much earlier in the development process significantly lowering
costs and shortening the time it takes to develop a new drug. Right now, all drugs go through
extensive animal trials before they are ever given to people. This can take years and cost millions
Carrillo5
of dollars. And even if the drugs appear perfectly safe in animalsthere is no guarantee that the
The ideal solution to the problem of drug side effects would be to test the drugs on human
cells before the drugs enter human clinical trials. The most common drug side effects are on the
liver, kidney and heart. For that reason, those are the tissues people are trying to create from
With toxicity screening, drug companies would have banks of stem cells from a wide
variety of genetic backgrounds. They could then test how heart, liver, or kidney cells created
from those stem cells react to a drugthus weeding out those drug candidates that lead to
This work also could reveal groups of people with similar genetic backgrounds that
collectively do or dont respond well to a given drug. This type of personalized medicine would
allow drug companies to develop drugs that are safe and effective in targeted groups of people.