Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Commencement of validity
Contents
Page
1 Scope 2
2 Definitions 2 '
3 General requirements 5
4 _conductors 5
5 Conductor accessories 12
6 Insulators, insulator sets 13
7 Accessories for insulator sets and
other conductor attachments 14
8 Towers 16
9 Foundations 43
10 Earthing 62
11 Clearances within t~e overhead power
line 62
12 Clearances in rural areas ' 64
13 Clearances and specifications for line
design in the proximity of building
installations and traffic routes 66
14 Special specifications for crossings
and approaches 78
Appendix A: Galvanizing of towers and other
components 79
Quoted standards and other .documents 81
Previous editions 87
Amendments 87
Comments 88
Continuation page 2 to 99
1. SCOPE
2. DEFINITIONS
Towers or poles are parts of the support~. Towers include the to-
wer body, earthwire peak(s) and crossarm(s). According to Clauses
2.2.1 to 2.2.7 they serve for following purposes.
2.2.4 Section tower and angle section tower carry the conductor
ter.sile forces in line direction or in the resultant direction,
respectively, and serve additionally as rigid points in the
line.
2.2.6 Special tower serves for one or several of the above men-
tioned purposes.
2.3 Foundations
2.4 Conductors
Conductors are the bare or covered, insulated or earthed cables
strung between the supports of an overhead line irrespective of
whether they are alive or not.
2.5 Insulators
2.6 Accessories
3. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
All components of an overhead line shall be selected, designed
and installed in such a manner that they perform reliably during
operation under the climatic conditions to be regularly expected,
under the maximum operating voltage, under the effects of the
electrical load current and under the short circuit loadings to
be expected. If necessary the influence of atmospheric and
switching overvoltages shall be taken into consideration.
4. CONDUCTORS
4.1 Rating
The standards of the series DIN 48201, DIN 48204 and DIN 48206
contain data for the current-carrying capacity of standardized
conductors.
DIN VDE 0103 applies to the mechanical and thermal short circuit
strength. Departing from this specification the permissible con-
conductor temperatures shall be limited to the values given in
Table 1.
4.2.1 Materials
Where materials are used which deviate from the mechanical and
electrical data given in Table 3 and the DIN standards their
characteristics and their qualification for the individual case
of application shall be proved.
4.2.2 Properties
Material Nominal
cross-section
mm 2
4.2.4 Tests
4.3 Sag
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 8
Conductor type and Cross- Stran- Unit dead- ' Coefficient Effective Pennissi ble Everyday Ultimate
'
rna terial sec- ding weight force of thermal modulus of maximum stress long-term
tional related to expansion Et elasticity working stress
ratio cross-section E stress
-6
QLK (~)
m.mm
(.!Q_)
kN/mm 2 N/mm 2 N/mm 2
K N/mm 2
61 157 J t-'
L___~
t-'
Page 12 DIN VDE 0210
5. CONDUCTOR ACCESSORIES
5.1 Rating
Deadend clamps shall sustain the conductor with 2,5 times the
maximum working tensile force or with 85 % of the conductor
failing load, which ever be the lower value.
Suspension clamps shall be rated for 2,5 times the forces acting
on the conductor ace. to Clause 8.1.
6.3 Testing
-~
/
DIN VDE 0441 Part 2 or DIN VDE 0446 Part 1 apply to testing in
order to verify that the requirements are met.
The accessories shall be rated for the forces resulting from the
maximu~ loads according to Clauses 8.1 to 8.3 multiplied by the
releva~t rating factors according to Table 4.
Material Rating
faC'tor
8. TOWERS
For all members which can be climbed and are inclined with an
angle less than 30 to horizontal an erection and maintenance
load of 1,5 kN acting vertically in the centre of a member shall
be assumed, however, \-lithout any other loads.
in kN
up to 20 up to 15 0,55 0,44
above 15 to 20 0 '7 0 0,53
0 to 200 0 to 40 0,70.~
. 0,53
I,
' .,
.... . "
above 40 to 100 0 '9 0 0,68
above 100 to 150 1,15 0' 8 6
above 150 to 200 1,25 0,95
Page 18 DIN VDE 0210
Component Aerodynam-
ical drag
coefficient c 1
/
/
Flat truss structures consisting of profiles l' 6
for a < 2 d *) 0
for a = 2 d m up t o a = 6 d 0,35
for a > 6 dmm m 0,7
For tower types which are not included in Table 7 the loading
cases shall be applied according to the utilization of the
towers.
8.2.1.1 General
8.2.2.1 General
Loading case MA l
The tensile force of one conductor at normal or increased addi-
tional load shall be assumed reduced by 50 % on one side in case
of single conductors. In case of bundled conductors the tensile
force shall be assumed reduced by 35 % on one side in case of
lengths of insulator sets up to 2,5 m and by 25 % in case of
lengths of insulator sets above 2,5 m. In case of earth wires a
reduction of 65 % shall be assumed.
Table 7. Loading cases of tower bodies
To1-1er type Normal loading (MN) ace. to Clause 8.2.1 Exceptional loading (MA)
ace. to Clause 8.2.2
Loading case Loading case Loading case Loading case Loading case Loading case Loading case
MN 1 MN 2 MN 3 MN 4 MN 5 MA 1 MA 2
Suspension Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent loads, additional
toVJers loads, addi- loads loads loads loads, addi- loads
tional loads tional loads
ToHer type Normal loading 01N) ace. to Clause 8.2.1 Exceptional loading (~~) N
ace. to Clause 8.2.2 N
0
Loading case Loading case Loading case Loading casejLoading case Loading case Loading case H
z
MN 1 MN 2 MN 3 MN 4 MN 5 MA 1 MA 2 <
0
[T]
Angle sus- Conductor Conductor Conductor Conductor Conductor ten- Conductor tensile forces at
pension tensile tensile tensile tensile s i l e forces . angle suspension toHers 0
N
towers and forces re- forces at forces at forces at resulting from ace. to Clause 8.2.2.2, at 1-'
angle toHers sulting +5c and +5c and +5c and additional angle towers 0
(cont.) from addi- wind load wind load wind load load and wind ace. to Clause 8.2.2.3
tional loads load ace. to
Clause 8.2.1.3
Section see angle see angle Permanent see angle see angle I Permanent loads, additional
towers and suspension suspension loads suspension suspension loads
angle section towers and towers and additional tov1ers and toHers and
toHers angle toHers angle towers loads angle toviers angle towers
Hind loads
~ ... ; \
on to1-1er and
equipment in
direction of
the axis of
crossarm
Tv:othirds of
the higher
conductor ten- Conductor tensile forces
sile forces at ace. to Clause 8.2.2.3
one side re-
sulting from
additional
loads. These
forces act in
the centre of
the toHer
Continued from Table 7.
ToHer type Normal loading (t'lN) ace. to Clause 8.2.1 Exceptional loading (MA)
ace. to Clause 8.2.2
Loading case Loading case Loading base Loading case Loading case Loading case Loading case
MN l t1N 2 MN 3 MN 4 MN 5 MA l MA 2
I'J
w
Page 24 DIN VDE 0210
Loading case MA 2
The tensile force of all conductors shall be assumed to be
reduced by 20 % on one side in case of pin-type insulators and
suspension towers with lengths of insulator sets up to 2,5 m and
by 15 % in case of suspension towers and lengths of insulator
sets above 2,5 m. For earth wires a reduction of 40 % shall be
assumed.
Loading case MA r
The tensile fore~ of one conductor with normal or increased addi-
tional load shall be assumed to be reduced on one side by 100%.
Loading case MA 2
The tensile forces of all conductors shall be assumed to be
reduced by 40 % on one side.
Loading case Loading case Loading case Loading case Loading case Loading case
QN l QN 2 QN 3 QA 1 QA 2 QA 3
Suspension Permanent loads, !Permanent loads Permanent loads Permanent loads, !Loads ace. to Permanent loads,
tm-1ers additional loads additional loads loading cases erection and
QN 1 to QN 3 or maintenance
Wind load in di- Wind load on Hind load on loaqing case loads ace. to
rection of the crossarm, equip- cross arm and QA 1 and failing Clause 8 .l.l. 3
axis of crossarm ment and conduc- equipment rec- of one insulator
on crossarm, tors in direc- tangularly to string ace. to
equipment and tion of the axis the axis of Clause 8.3.2.1
conductors Hith of crossarm crossarm
additional load Conductor ten- Conductor ten-
aec. to Clause sile forces sile forces
8.2.1.3 ace. to Clause ace. to Clause
8.3.2.2 8.3.2.2
Angle Permanent loads, !Permanent loads !Permanent loads Permanent loads, !Loads ace. to Permanent loads,
suspension additional loads additional loads loading cases erection and
tmle rs and QN l to QN 3 or maintenance
angle tov1ers Hind load in di- Wind load on Wind load on loading case loads ace. to
rection of the crossarm, equip- crossarm and QA l and fail- Clause 8.1.1.3
axis of crossarm ment and conduc- equipment rec- ing of one in-
on crossarm, tors in direc- tangularly to sulator string 0
equipment and tion of the axis the axis of ace. to Clause H
z
conductors with of crossarm crossarm 8.3.2.1
additional load <
0
ace. to Clause [r)
sile forces from,sile forces at sile forces at tO\Iers ace. to toHers ace. to .,
Pl
additional and +5"C and wind +5"C and wind Clause 8.3.2.2 Clause 8.3.2.2 ()q
Hind load ace. load load at angle toHers at angle toHers ill
1\)
Loading case Loading case I Loading case Loading case Loading case I Loading case 0\
QN 1 I QN 2 ' , QN 3 QA 1 QA 2 QA 3 0
H
z
Section Permanent loads, Loads ace. to Permanent <
towers and additional loads ;Loading cases loads, 0
trl
angle QN 3 and fail- erection and
0
section ing of one in- maintenance 1\)
towers see angle sus- see angle sus- Wind loads on sulator string loads ace. to I-'
0
pension towers pension towers crossarm and ace. to Clause Clause 8 .1.1. 3
and angle and angle equipment in di- 8.3.2.1
towers towers rection of the
axis of crossarm
Higher one-sided
conductor ten-
s i l e force of
one conductor
with addi tiona! ' - Conductor ten-
load at tacking sile forces
most unfavour- ace. to
ably and simul- loading
taneously two case QN 3
thirds of the
higher one-sided
conductor forces
of the other
conductors with
additional load
/
Continued from Table 8.
Tower type Normal loading (QN) ace. to Clause 8.3.1 Exceptional loading (QA) ace. to Clause 8.3.2
Loading case Loading case Loading case Loading case Loading case Loading case
QN 1 QN 2 Q!'l 3 QA 1 QA 2 QA 3
0
f\J
......
0
'"U
Ill
OQ
C1>
(\)
-.J
Page 28 DIN VDE 0210
8.3.2.1 General
Aid = Z(1 + ~)
!ltd z
H, =fa+ 2
H2 HJ""' Md
2h
jl
Aid Z
1-1. = 2 d- 2
When using this approach the ratio alb shall not exceed 1,5. The
shape of the tower must be prismatic or correspond to a truncated
pyramid. At all crossarm levels and at changes of slope of leg
members, horizontal bracings shall be provided and their adequacy
shall be proven.
Page 30 DIN VDE 0210
8.4.2.2 Materials
Hhere:
F absolute value of the maximum compression force occurring
in the member in N
applies.
Hhere:
E modulus of elasticity,
for steel E = 210000 N/mm 2
A slenderness ratio
1) Fv ace. to DIN 18800 Part 1/03.81, Table 9 Column 2 and DIN 18800
Part 7/05.83, Table 1 Column 2, respectively.
Page 34 DIN VDE 0210
All
, . '
stay plates ~nd bracings as well as their connections shall
be rated such that under action of the virtual member shear force
... .
. ,, ...
does not exc~e~~8o.
...
b)
d)
,for a K-bracing, '.. sk '= 0,9 s may only be adopted if the ends of
the bracihg .members are supported by a reinforcing panel.
In all other
. " :
~~~es sk = s shall be taken.
.; :,~ / ~ C;-~ ..:! r.: :-....~ , ,..
~-~-2.12 Proof of local b~ckling strength
where 'A means the slenderness ratio relevant to the rating of the
member.
. \~
Diameters of bolts less than 12 mm are not permissible for
st~uctural loading. The minimum strength quality for bolts M 12
is 5.6 according to DIN 267 Part 1.
t J
Holes_ for rivets and bolts may be punched into angles and plates
of up to -12 mm thickness. Permanent supervision shall ensure
that sharp punches and suiting ~ies are used for the manufac-
turing. -
In the case of a two line step bolt arrangement the angle between
the planes of the bolts shall be at least go.
The width of the steps shall amount to at least 300 mm for single
line arrangement and at least 150 mm in case of two line step
bolt arrangement. Flat tread width shall be at least 20 mm,
and the diameter of cylindrical treads at least 24 mm. To
provide a protection against sliding a lateral limit at least 20
mm high measured from the top of step must be provided.
DIN VDE 0210 Page 39
s :5. f.:. t
where:
s theoretical width of sides of the polygon
t thickness
page 40 DIN VDE 0210 .
The latteral deflection of the pole at the pole top due to the
load may theoretically be demonstrated following the first order
theory without consideration of the movement of foundation
and shall be limited as follows:
The standards DIN 48350 and DIN 48351 Part 1 and 2 apply to
single wood poles and A-poles, respectively.
DIN VDE 0210 Page 41
If sing:~ wood poles and A-poles do not comply with DIN 48350 and
DIN 48351 Part 1 and 2, respectively, a analytical proof will be
necessar;. The stresses given in Table 11 shall not be exceeded.
If wood poles are in use for more than three years they shall be
protected effectively by preservative agents against rotting and
insects. Particular attention shall be given to bore holes and
scarfing::;.
Even if bore holes and scarfings are made subsequently they shall
be provided with an efficient wood protection.
For other tower designs and for towers made of other materials
the same minimum requirements accordingly apply as in case of the
above mentioned tower types. Towers made of aluminium alloys
shall be designed according to DIN 4113 under consideration of
the loading assumptions specified above. For normal loading
according to Clauses 8.1 to 8.3 the permissible stresses valid
for the loading case H (main forces) apply, and for
exceptional loading 1,375 times these stresses.
The failing load of the steel ropes with end fittings included
shall be at least 2,25 times or 1,8 times the working force for
normal and excertional loading, respectively.
Th8 failing load of the rope provided with end fittings shall be
demonstrated by tensile tests on at least one sample per rope
diameter. This requirement for tests can be disregarded
- if the design of the rope and of the end fitting as well as the
corresponding mechanical strength data can be taken from a DIN
standard or
For all other towers the stays shall be bonded to the earthing
system of the support.
g. FOUNDATIONS
The foundation of a tower can be designed either as a compact
foundation or as a separate footing foundation.
9.1 Requirements
Clays, clayey silts and silts as well as their mixtures with non-
cohesive soils (mixed grained soils with higher portion of fine-
grain) are classified as cohesive soils, if the weight portion of
cohesive ingredients with particle sizes below 0,06 mm exceeds
15% (for example sandy clay, sandy silt, loam, marl). The fine
Page 44 DIN VDE 0210
gr~ined solls iUL, UM, TL, TM, TA) and the mixed grained soils
(SU, ST, ST, GU and GT) according to DIN 18196 are within this
category of soil.
9.2.2 Rock
I;,__,-~-~------- -~
1_9 I (1::1
1 2 j3 _II ____ 7 8 ____ Jll CD
1----------- ----------- --
Type of soi 1 Specific weight Angle oftliP~1n;';'"'soll Coeff. Angle of earth frustum ace. to Clauses -'=
force(values for internal pressure K "'t'
design) friction at a depth ace. tol9.6.1,. 9.6.2 and 9.6.3 (B 0 ) 9.5.1 (B) H
not more Clause z
na turallyl with than 1,5 m 9.3.2 c::::1
0
humid bouyancy Foundation type acc.to Fig.~ t:>l
u s
kN/m
B
1----'- IJ\ Mono block
I
0
N
1-'
3
kN/m 3
Degree kN/m 3
Degree 0
-=". . .
.,;;" I
hard, purely cohesive 18 27,5 400 3,5 32to42 30to37 23to28 13to23 10
hard, with non-cohesive 19 30 400 4 35to46 33to40 26to28 2lto23 10
additions t
0
N
1-J
0
.,
PJ
(JQ
(D
.t=
---.j
Page 48 DIN VDE 02~0
For the purposes of analysis, the maximum unit weight of the non-
reinforced concrete may be taken as 22 kN/m 3 , and of reinforced
concrete as 24 kN/m
3
9.5.2.2 Stability-conditions
t~;:; 0.59
r
where,
r radius of the circular area.
-X
b.
3
Foundation type U:
Lowermost step undercut.
Foundation type A:
Lowermost step concreted to undisturbed subsoil.
Foundation type S:
Lowermost step concreted to shuttering.
Hhere:
b
n
I.Jo angle of earth frustum for -t = 1 according to
Table 12 Columns 8, 9 and 10.
T c = - .25m
:-----, b
. b i
;-----,
.
'
'
i :2::0,2m
bresp.d
Where:
=angle of earth frustum ace. to Clauses 9.6.1.1, 9.6.2.1
and 9.6.3.1
e = permissible eccentricity ace. to Clause 9.6.1.4
natural soil
backfill
Hhere:
G dead load of the foundation block and of the soil resting
vertically upcn the foundation base.
z Vertical component of the uplift force acting on the faun-
dation.
Where:
9.6.4.1 G~:1eral
P;~- -
1 A
foundations shall c~ designed such that the
~ ) ~ : :.. :"'. ~.:: !'"" ~ !: u l t : :-: ~
!'rem the structure are exclusively transferre~
:J :~e 3u~scil by the piles.
Page 56 DIN VDE 0210
Since for piles a wide scatter of the values of skin friction has
to be expected the theoretical proof of stability of a pile under
uplift loading shall be carried out for a stability factor of 2
against reaching the ultimate tensile load Q . When carrying out
the proof by loading tests according to Claue 9.6.4.6 a stabili-
ty factor of 1,5 will be sufficient.
/j
I
/i
I
Extrapolat1onI;
, I '
'y'
... - ---- --:-o I
---------- ;/
- .- cyde
I
I
cyde I
I
Where:
Q Tensile test force
Working tensile load ace. to Clause 9.6.4.1, last
sentence
on = 1,oso n Working tensile force for testing ace. to Clause
9.6.4.6,last sentence
Q Failing load
g
s Uplift displacement due to Q
~
Wi 1 t~ n t c s t i n g p i 1 e s f o r u p 1 i f t t h e d i s t a n c e o f t h e c e n t r e s o f a c -
tion of the compression reaction may be kept small because of the
min0r influence on the result of the uplift. HoweJer, it should
b~ not less than 3 m and, due to the influence of the addition~!
lo3dings exerted by th~ test bridge, the uplift working load 0
:; h .1 l l be inc r cas c d by 5 % ( see Fig. 5 ) . n
9.8.1.1 Rating
Th~ rating and th~ evaluation of forces and bending moments and
~he installation o~ foundation blocks shall be carried out ac-
cording to Dill 1045 if not stipulated other,;ise in the follo,;ing
clauses. The conc~ete for unreinforced foundations shall comply
at least ~ith the strength quality class B 10, and for reinforced
foundation blocks with class B 15.
of concrete
100
I 200 I 300 I 400 I 500
8 10 0,4
3 15 0' 5
~
25 0, 6
B 35 0,7
Fer ~his, it r.1ust be ensured that the leg member stubs are
closel} encased in concrete along their ~otal length. In case of
angle sections or channels the analysis shall be based en the
perifery of the enclosed area, e.g. for a single angle section
~he leg lengths plus the hypotenuse. To improve the anchoring
additional cleats or the like shall be provided at the leg mer.1ber
stubs close to the foundation subface, but are not considered
i:. ti':::! anal:,sis.
7he ~er~issible
s~resses for steel r.1embers in concrete ca:-1 te
:a~e~ frc~
:able 9. The bendi:Lg stress in welded seams o: lu~s
3n~ cleats need not be demonstrated.
Page 62 DIN VDE 0210
10. EARTHING
vih ere:
sag in m of the conductor at +40 c
length in m of that part of the insulator set swinging
transversely to the line direction
coefficient according to Table 17
minimum clearance in m depending on the voltage
according to Table 16.
an;l~ tp range
in ,I !I I
degrees O'to 30'toleo~o : ACSR AAC Copper
30' 8o' jgo AACSR AAAC Bronze
1
Supplement to Table 17
IJ
0
t 0 30 > 30' to eo >80' to go
. ''
:' /
---~------
Page 64 DIN VDE 0210
13.l.Gcncral
For of
~ro.::;sing and approaches to residential property or to
ot~1er buildings, general methods for establishing of the pro-
tuclive areas between the conductors in still air and under swing
conditions and the nearest part of the structure are given in
Fig. 6.
Cross1ng Approach
(Clause 13 21 J (Clause 13 2 2 l
_;
\j /
3 0. ~ '
13.2.1 Cros:Jing
13.2.2 Approach
13.3.1 Crossing
13.3.1.1 Vertical clearance between ccnductors and parts of the
installation.
In ca~e of crossing of
,111 overhead traction installation of a railway
t.!lc swing of conducto:"s at +40 c due to \-lind load shall be
.1 ~~ s u r:1 e d s i mu l tan eo us 1 y with the sag a t - 5 C w i thou t add i t i on a 1
load for the crossed conductor~ of the overhead traction
installation.
In case of crossing of
supporting and pulling ropes of a ropeway installation
that position of the ropes of the ropeway installation shall be
assum~d to be most unfavourable which can occur when the maximum
tensile stress is increased by 25 %.
t 3 . 3 . 1 5 0 v e r head 1 i n e des i in
~=rt~ 0 n:al clearance between the vertical axis through the de-
r.
- ~ 2 : ~ ,j cor. c! u c tor an d
::--:-:: h~ i.~r.: gauge or the compo:1ent:.> o: an ove;head-
:;3c':~on ~ire installation of a railway or o: a
:;~ll~y bJ:; line 1,5 m
':~~ ~ 8 ~ponents of a rope~ay installation 5 m
DIrl VDE 0 2 1 0 Page 7 1
13.3.3 Undcrcrossings
13.4.1 Crossings
13.5.1 Cro!lsing
When routing the line or when designing the sports ground care
shall be taken to ensure that in case of shooting or sports with
throwing implements (for exam~le hammer, javelin, discus) an
approac~ to the conductors closer than 3 m is avoided.
13.5.2 Approach
Inst<ll- Cros ~; i nr, Conditions for f1pproach <:md runr1 inr, in Conditions for --l
lation evaluation\ line par-allel evaluation line "'0
crossed by of clear- de- \ of clear- de- H
the line anr:e:.> 1 si~n ances \ sir;n
I I <
Residential Clearance between conductor and IJ. 3 .l and lll. 2 i Clearance between the vertical 11.3 .l 0
I ["11
proper ties
and other
nearest part of building for 11.3. 2
roofing ace. to DI!J 1Jl02 Part 7 8.1.2.1 l 14.3
14.4
axis thr~ur;h the deflected con- 8.1.2.1
ductor 2nd the nearest part of 13.1 0
N
buildings with slope > 15 3 m lll. 8 111.6 the building 3 m 1-J
other roofing
::: 15 5m
12 m
13.1 I 14.7
0
protective fences 3 m
I -.l
-.l
Page 78 DIN VDE 0210
1 11 . 1 Gc n c r a 1
for all other crossings wood poles may only be used in a straight
line or ~ith line angles greater than 160", however, for line
angles less than 180" A-poles according to DIN 48 351 Part 1 and
or:J 4e352 Part 2 shall be used. In case of line angles bet..1een
180' and 170' a specific analysis is not required.
for the evaluation of the sag it shall be assumed, that the con-
ductors in the crossing span are loaded by the half of the normal
or increased additional load at -5 c while the conductors in
all other spans of the line section are unloaded.
111 . 1 0 C 1 c a r a n c e
between the conductors in case of failure of an
insulator string
APPENDIX A
GALVANIZING OF TOWERS AND OTHER COMPONENTS
A.3 Caps for overhead line insulators and fittings for overhead
linez
i) ! ~; lj l l 3 A 1 u m i n i u m i n B u i l d i n g Co n ::; t r u c t i o n , D i r c: c t i o n ~ f o r
Calculation and Design of Aluminium Buildinc
Cor:1ponent::;.
DIN 6914 Hexagon Bolts with Large Widths across Flats for
Hig~-Tensile Bolting in Steel Structures.
D!11 7990 Hexagon Bolts with Hexagon Nuts for Steel Structures.
DI :J 4 82 0 3 S t e e 1 \~ i r e s an d S : e e 1 S t r a n d e d Co n d u c t o r s ;
Pa:--t 3 Technical Delivery Conditions.
Dlt! 118203 Aluminium Clad Steel Wires and Aluminium Clad Steel
P.::.rt 8 Stranded Conductors;
Technical Delivery Conditions.
DI!l 4 8 ~ 5 l A- 11 a s t s , Bo 1 t e s , Nu t s , Wa s h e r s .
Part 2
Further documents
I l I f: i e B1 i n g , F
Frcileitungen und Umwelt
Slektrizitatswirtschaft, Vol. 80 (1981), p. 681 to 683
I 2 I
- f: i c B l in g, F , Ne f z g e r , P
Zur Wahl der Zugspannung fur die Leiter einer Hochspnn-
nungs-Freileitung
Elektrizitatswirtschaft, Vol. 80 (1981), p. 684 to 691
-
1 3 I Brandt, E., Thomas, R.
Der EinfluB der bleibenden Seildehnung auf das Durchhangs-
verhalten von Freileitungen
Elektrizitatswirtschaft, Vol. 78 (1979), p. 262 to 268
-
I 4 I Bauer, E., Brandt, E., Brand, R., Klein, H., Mocks, L.,
Schlotz, H.
Dynamic processes during load transposition in multiple
sets with long rod-type insulators
CIGRS, 1982, Report 22-03
I
-
_,I ::ieBling, F., Ranke, K.
Beanspruchung von Freileitungen durch extreme Wind- und
::islasten Elektrizitatswirtschaft, Vol. 79 (1980), p. 683
to 692
T------
.J:.:a.::--:a~le ~!"or.::
I 6 I
- Freitag, ;..., Brandt, E.
Dyna~ische Beanspruchungen von Mittelspannungsfreileitun-
gen beim Abwurf von Eislasten
Elektrizit.atswirtschaft, Vol. 80 (1981), p. 668 to 676
-
1 71 Brandt,::., Griese, W., Gorrissen, I., ~Histenberg, K.-F.
Erkenntnisse und Folgerungen der Schleswag aus den Schnee-
notlagen und ihre Auswirkungen auf den Mittelspannungs-
Freileitungsbau
Elektrizitatswirtschaft, Vol. 82 (1983), p. 697 to 705
I l 1 I Schmidt , B.
Pfahlsysteme im Freileitungsbau und ihr Sicherheitsnach-
we is
T e c h n . Mi t t e i 1 u n g e n AE G- T e 1 e f u n k e n ( 1 9 8 2 ) , p . 1 8 t o 2 11
Previous editions
VDE 0210: 07.03; 01.08; 01.14; 07.21; 10.23; 01.30; 02.58; 05.69
Amendments
Compared with the edition May 1969 the following has been
amended:
Contents completely revised; refer to comments.
Page 88 DIN VDE 0210
COMMENTS
Clau~c 2: Definitions
T~rm:; Here included for all overhead line Components and sup-
port:. These were neHly incorporated in Clause 2.2 for towers
~nd in Clause 2.3 for foundations. The functions of the indi-
;idu::~ tower types were described.
Lr, Clau:~e 2.4 the term "breaking force'! was replaced by "failing
:or c _:" and the terms "tens i 1 e stress 11 , "conductor t c mp c rat u r e 11
:1 n d "u n i t we i g h t force r e 1 ate d the c r o 3 s sec t i on" were added . In
c l:1 u :; e :-; 2 . 5 11 in:> u 1 at or s 11 and 2 6 11 f i t t in g s 11 the terms a 1 ready
<! 1; f i r. e d i n o the r DIN s tan dar d s were c i t e d or r e f e r en c e was ma d e
to them. Those terms additionally used within this standard were
ex~laincd. Also the terms concerning the layout of overhead power
l i r: e ~ a c c o r d i n g to C1 au s e 2 . 7 we r e c o mp 1 e t e d .
Clau~e 4: Conductors
A~ ever,
the thermal rating of conductors shall be carried out
for the
permanent electrical load current as well as for the
~h~rt circ~it loading. The relevant DIN standards and standards
lndicated as VDE Specifications form the basis. Investigations
carried out with varying conductors demonstrate that unlike DIN
~~E 0103 the maximum temperature of the va~ying conductors must
te l!~!ted to the values stated in Table 1 in order to ensure the
~e~~a~ical strength of the conductors.
;:: !"' ~ : i 0 u s 1 'j the ~echanical rating has to be carried out with
to ~:~axir.~um working tensile stress, long-term stress and
DIN VDS 0210 Page 89
Clause 4.1.2.~
contains details concerr.ing reasons and factors
effec~ing aeolian vibrations. In particular suitable de:ign of
suspe~sion and anti~vibration protection devices in cases of in-
creas~d tendency to vibration is now referred to.
Clause 6: Insulators
In C1 a u s e 6 . 1 . 2 " :1 e c h a n i c a l r a t i n g " t h e a p pr o ve d r a t i ng f a c t o r s
were kept in force.
This clause was adjusted to new standards, for example DIN VDE
0212 P1.1 t 50, Part 53 and Part 54 and rearra;1ged. ln Table 4
additional materials for accessories of insulator sets and other
conductor attachments were integrated, and the corresponding
rating factors were given. When installing turnbuckles attention
shall be paid to ensure that their thread bolts will not be
3tressed by bending.
Clause 8: Towers
The clause was provided with a new structure together with inter-
m~diate headings which should assist in finding particular
topics.
The loading cases for the tower bodies were clearly gr6uped in
Ta~le 7 so that loading cases with the same physical basis were
given the same designation for all tower types wh~reby the se-
par~tion into normal loading cases and exceptional loading cases
was maintained .. Loading cases for tower bodies under normal loa-
ding were designated by MN, under exceptional loading by MA. Some
new aspects resulted for the applications of and assumptions in
individual loading cases.
The loadinc; case "Wind on conductors rith ice" (loading case MtJ 5
a~cording to Table 7) was newly introduced. Wind may act also on
conductors with ice. The loading case, therefore, takes care of
physical facts. Damage of overhead lines with ice accretion on
the conductors showed that the additional wind effects, thereby,
played an important role.
Also the specifications for lattice steel towers (see Clause 8.4)
~re amended in some items. The permissible stresses (see
T~ble 9) are adjusted to the technical development and to the
current DIN standards. In future bolts of the quality 4.6 in-
stead of 3.6 will be used. The shearing and bearing stresses per-
missible for joints with standard bolts are modified accord-
ingly; additionally, in Table 9 permissible stresses for high
strength bolts of shearing/bearing connections are integrated.
The Omega-method for the rating of members under compression was
retained. The former Table 6 showing the data of relevant
cross-sections for the varying loading types was omitted.
As far as deviations from practice adopted generally for steel
structures are accepted for overhead line towers, these are
mentioned in the relevant clauses (see for example Clause
8.4.2.6). Si~ce slenderness ratios greater than 250 are also per-
mitted for compression members of lattice steel towers a formula
for the corresponding Omega-factors is given.
.3 p ~ c i : i c a t i o n s
concerning facilities for climbing lattice steel
towers ~ere i~corporated in accordance with the Eoployers'
L:ability Insurance.
Clause 9: Foundations
The loading cases for the tower bodies were clearly gr6uped in
Ta~le 7 so that loading cases with the same physical basis were
given the same designation for all tower types wh~reby the se-
par~tion into normal loading cases and exceptional loading cases
was maintained .. Loading cases for tower bodies under normal loa-
ding were designated by MN, under exceptional loading by MA. Some
new aspects resulted for the applications of and assumptions in
individual loading cases.
The loadinc; case "Wind on conductors rith ice" (loading case MtJ 5
a~cording to Table 7) was newly introduced. Wind may act also on
conductors with ice. The loading case, therefore, takes care of
physical facts. Damage of overhead lines with ice accretion on
the conductors showed that the additional wind effects, thereby,
played an important role.
Also the specifications for lattice steel towers (see Clause 8.4)
~re amended in some items. The permissible stresses (see
T~ble 9) are adjusted to the technical development and to the
current DIN standards. In future bolts of the quality 4.6 in-
stead of 3.6 will be used. The shearing and bearing stresses per-
missible for joints with standard bolts are modified accord-
ingly; additionally, in Table 9 permissible stresses for high
strength bolts of shearing/bearing connections are integrated.
The Omega-method for the rating of members under compression was
retained. The former Table 6 showing the data of relevant
cross-sections for the varying loading types was omitted.
As far as deviations from practice adopted generally for steel
structures are accepted for overhead line towers, these are
mentioned in the relevant clauses (see for example Clause
8.4.2.6). Si~ce slenderness ratios greater than 250 are also per-
mitted for compression members of lattice steel towers a formula
for the corresponding Omega-factors is given.
.3 p ~ c i : i c a t i o n s
concerning facilities for climbing lattice steel
towers ~ere i~corporated in accordance with the Eoployers'
L:ability Insurance.
Clause 9: Foundations
\vhere:
... r. .- a::_-::
,
-~
- tr.e
. .
clearances ...rere llste ... h as n 0 ....~ discr-iptir-..,
d ..1:.~. - - .. ,
~
-l~~1:a~e~u=-1
,
the c-auses
1 re 1 evant .or ..he
.. ~
evaluation
- of
. ':.he
ci~ar~nce~ and for the design of overhead line were mer.tlone~.
?age 98 DIN V~~ 0210
In ~a~e
of crossing of residential or other buildings the varying
~!ope~ of roofs were considered if :he roofing co~plies ~ith
D.!:i: 11102 Part 7. Since mountable flat roof~ are erected to ar. ir.-
crea~ing extent raising of clearances fro~ 3 to 5 ~ was required
fer :his type of roofs due to safety considerations .
. r:: protccti;r~ areas sho....-r, in Fig. 6 are based or. saGs of con-
r:. t o r ::;
(: t; in st i l 1 a i r a c c o r d i n ~;; t o C1 a u s e s 4 . 3 . 1 a n d L: 3 . 2 a r. d o n
~a~s according to +40 c of the swung cor.~~ctcrs justified by the
r ;~ r: t , t h a t '.1 i n d n e c e s sa r y f o r s w i n g i n g o f con d u c to r s s i ~ u 1 t a r. r~ -
,,usly causes cooling.
~ 1 ll ~ ad j u .s t. n e n t
t ::, '::. o t he c u r r e n t l i r. e d e s i g n , s c ::: e c o n d i t i o n s
~~~~rn~~g particularly increased additiona~ loads of
~:uc:~r~ ir crossings could be o~~::~d whe~ compared ~~:h
~ ;:, r .-:: : i c ~~ ::; -:: c! i t ~ o !1 of t he s t a n da r d . F' ~..: : : ~ e r ::-: 0 r ~ ~ :-. e c o :;1 b i ra a : ~ c. :--.
r~~~~re:::e~:s ccncerning wood poles r~sulted i~ redu~ing :~e
:-. ~- e :- - ' p .~ r t. i ~ ~ l a:- s;:; ~ c 1 f i c a '::. i on s .
DIN VDE 0210 Page gg
Steel wi~s,
H 01 B l/C2
li 01 8 17/00
!! 02 G 7/00
E 04 H 12/00
E 04 H 12/08
E 04 H 12/10
E 04 H 12/12
....t' 04 H 12/20
E 011 H 12/22
E 02 D 27!00