Sei sulla pagina 1di 2

techbits

Understanding Naturally Fractured Reservoirs

A recent Applied Technology Workshop (ATW) held in Houston, Cretaceous NFR in this field, Marchal emphasized the successful
Naturally Fractured Reservoirs, explored reservoir characteriza- application of selective technologies and methodologies and the
tion, fracture-network modeling and reservoir simulation, and expe- need to fully integrate the structural model with the dynamic one.
rience with improved-oil-recovery (IOR) and enhanced-oil-recovery
(EOR) processes in naturally fractured reservoirs (NFRs). The ATW Geologic and Flow Models
featured a technical agenda divided into four sessions and included Permeability EstimationU. of Texas at Austin Assistant Professor
more than 20 presentations. The four main sessions were: Jon Olson, in Permeability Estimation in Fractured Reservoirs: A
NFR Characterization (cochaired by El Paso Energy Petroleum Fracture Mechanics Approach Incorporating Diagenetic Effects,
Engineer Enrique Peralta and Texas A&M U. Assoc. Professor emphasized interwell fracture-pattern attributes, industry-standard
David Schechter). models, and constrained modeling. Participants discussed the ori-
Constructing NFR Geologic and Flow Models (cochaired by gin of strain rates, whether to include pore pressure as a nonlinear-
Ecopetrol Chief Engineer and Vice PresidentExploration Andreas ity, and the creation of extension fractures.
Mantilla and Repsol Reservoir Engineer Hugo Araujo). Role of Outcrop AnalogsJuan-Mauricio Florez, iReservoir
Predicting NFR Performance (cochaired by Texas A&M U. Geoscientist, offered an overview of creating equally probable geo-
Professor Thomas Blasingame and Colorado School of Mines logic models and the reasoning behind the use of outcrops, and he
Research Professor Hossein Kazemi). presented illustrative outcrop cases that indicate hierarchical shear-
Improved and Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery in NFRs ing and progressive deformation, spacing and dimension of fracture
(cochaired by Kazemi and Schechter). hierarchies linked to stratigraphy, and antithetic conjugate faults
creating fracture swarms.
NFR Characterization Integration of Conventional, Image, and Production LogsMantilla
Heterogeneity: Cause and EffectThe presentation by Chevron presented a case study in which reproduction of dynamic behav-
Energy Technology Center Structural Geologist Wayne Narr, titled ior (identification of fracture patterns and principal stress) was
Guilt and Absolution in NFR Characterization: The Cause and reviewed. Discussion centered around fracture indicators other than
Devilish Effect of Heterogeneity, examined the concept of represen- logs, fractures at the pore scale, and whether fracture damage dur-
tative elemental volume, illustration of fracture-network intersec- ing drilling is permanent.
tion with the well, and evaluation interval of the fracture density. Discrete Fracture-Network ModelsAraujo presented the ratio-
Outcrop analogs necessary for qualifying heterogeneity and model- nale of dynamic behavior of discrete fracture-network (DFN) mod-
ing of fractured-formation systems also were addressed. The presen- els based on geological reservoir characterization as the first step in
tation concluded with discussion among workshop participants on constructing a credible reservoir flow model, classical deterministic
fracture allocations for simulation, the combination of primary and methods, and/or quantitative stochastic approaches. Considerable
secondary porosity in simulation, and numerical modeling. emphasis was given to well-test analysis (fracture network and
Dissimilar FracturingSandia Natl. Laboratory Geologist John non-Darcy-flow effects). Conclusions reached included NFRs being
Lorenz presented Difference Between Fractures in Limestones and adequately represented using a matrix system and a DFN model
Sandstones, in which observations regarding lithology were made with a fine-grid dual-porosity model, fracture properties needing to
that supported the conclusion that production-induced pressure be calibrated with transient well-test data, and dynamic upscaling
(stress) changes can destroy permeability. Regarding fracture cre- as the best approach to upscale fracture properties.
ation, discussion centered around two schools of thought: the idea
of more fractures creating less matrix permeability and whether Predicting Performance
extension fractures are conductive. Fracture Network Modeling and Reservoir SimulationGolder Assocs.
Seismic for Reservoir CharacterizationPrism Seismic Director of Principal Tom Doe explored fracture models (stochastic, mixed
Consulting Abdel Zellou, in Seismically Driven Fractured Reservoir stochastic/deterministic); future uses of DFN models (whether we
Characterization, illustrated high-resolution inversion (elastic and are getting enough data in a producing reservoir, rigorous testing of
post-stack) and other processes that can provide a basis for model- methodologies and hypotheses); improvements to look for in DFN
ing, the use of seismic attributes (e.g., impedance) to derive geologic modeling (better hydraulic data through improved flow logging to
models (e.g., porosity) constrained by the seismic data, and fracture determine conductor spacing and transmissivity distributions and
drivers (seismic, geological, and geomechanical) in 3D. One topic of better monitoring data); and issues of scaling (diffusivity values from
discussion was drilling recommendations based on seismic attributes. interference responses provide correct scaling; matching is nonu-
La ConcepcinDenis Marchal, Petrobras Technical Advisor nique with respect to permeability and storage for linear flow).
in Structural Geology, delivered a presentation on Reservoir Simulating Multiphase-Fluid Flow and Reservoir ProductionU. of
Characterization and Tailored Technology Application in the Mature Utah Professor Milind Deo reflected on the current state of reser-
Cretaceous NFR of La Concepcin Field, Venezuela. Presenting voir simulation, offering case studies and observations. According
the key operational strategies used in redevelopment of the mature to Deo, finite-difference simulators dominate the market. Pointing

24 JPT MAY 2006


techbits

out that complex domains (with complex well patterns/arbitrary well. Conclusions from this study included that integration of different
fracture patterns) are difficult to simulate, it was noted that finite- data sets could be used to characterize the fracture network on one
element models with body-fitting meshes are more appropriate for well, that diffuse fractures were identified from core description and
these systems. Following observations regarding capillarity, ATW borehole image data; that bed thickness and shalyness were factors that
participants were introduced to a new 3D/three-phase black-oil controlled diffuse fracture occurrence, and that fracture occurrence was
simulator based on the control-volume finite-element formulation. based on analysis of the fold geometry (strain-partitioning model).
Case studies with tilted, partially penetrating faults were presented Determination and Sensitivity of Fracture Characterization Parameter
to demonstrate the applicability of the simulator. for History MatchingNitec Director Chet Ozgen addressed issues
Development of the West Rozel Fractured-Basalt Heavy-Oil Reservoir of fracture connectivity, sensitivity analyses, and the data sources
In addition to giving a comprehensive overview of deposition descrip- for fracture parameters. Discussion took place on the use of finite-
tion, a description and validation of the reservoir model, a layered fault- difference models in integrated studies, the simulator parameters
ed-section model, and a full-field model, MK Tech Solutions Principal used in finite-difference models, and how to correlate data sources
Myron Kuhlman presented the formula for optimum oil recovery in to simulator parameters.
this reservoir. Findings from this case study regarding optimum oper-
ating conditions included very little drawdown with horizontal wells, Improved and Enhanced Recovery
limiting liquid production to a few barrels per foot of well, optimizing Enhanced Gravity Drainage Through Immiscible CO2 Injection
cumulative production with a low gas-production rate, and maintain- Kinder Morgan Reservoir Engineering Director John Dobitz shared
ing reservoir pressure within 100 psia of the original pressure and experiences in the Yates field in Texas. In addition to an overview
reservoir oil viscosity within a few percent of the original. of field history and current activities in this field, possible EOR
Early Diagnosis of Natural-Fracture Contribution to Permeability at the processes were examined, including thermal operations, methane
Field-Appraisal StagePresenting a case history from eastern Siberia, injection, natural-gas-to-liquids (NGL) injection, and immiscible
Beicip Reservoir Modeling Manager Rolf Ackerman shared fracture CO2 injection. According to Dobitz, thermal methods would have
characterization and conclusions for geological analysis of this reser- yielded a doubtful response, methane would be expensive for void-
voir in addition to discussing how calibrated hydraulic properties of age replacement, and NGL injection would prove expensive and
the fractures were obtained by integrating the dynamic data on one challenging. Immiscible CO2 injection was selected on the basis
of reasonable cost and positive compositional effects. Gassed-out
horizontal producers were converted into CO2 injectors.
Dilute-Surfactant-Aided Gravity DrainageU. of Houston
Now Available! Professor Kishore Mohanty reported on recent experiments of tra-
ditional vs. fractured carbonates. Experiments included wettability,

R&D adsorption, oil-recovery range for anionic-surfactant solution, and


brine imbibition. Discussion centered on the effects of formation

Providers
water and lithology on the proposed chemicals.
Wettability Alteration in Carbonate Formations With Surfactants
Rice U. Professor George Hirasaki addressed wettability alteration,

Directory phase behavior and low interfacial tension, anionic-surfactant


adsorption in calcite, spontaneous imbibition, and force displace-
ment. Among conclusions reached were: dependence of optimal
salinity on surfactant concentration and water-to-oil ratio can be
Do you conduct upstream R&D? correlated with natural soap/surfactant mole ratio; anionic-surfac-
tant/Na2CO3/NaCl system is capable of inducing wide ultralow
Feature your organizations R&D expertise interfacial tension and wettability alteration; nitrogen blend allows
the surfactant solution to be injected at optimal salinity as a single
Connect with companies that need phase; and sodium carbonate reduces the adsorption of anionic sur-
factants on calcite as long as the surfactant solution remains clear.
technology applications Experience With IOR and EOR ProcessesKazemi introduced IOR
and EOR processes, noting how gravity and capillary forces affect the
ultimate result. According to him, EOR processes in single-porosity
systems have a strong viscous displacement component; for NFRs,
viscous displacement plays a small role while gravity drainage plays a
major role. A comparison was made between IOR and EOR for steam
Get listed today! injection (heating and gravity drainage), CO2 injection (composition-
al effects), and wettability alteration. It was concluded that NFRs can
be produced efficiently, and use of appropriate IOR and EOR methods
For more information, visit www.spe.org, should improve ultimate recovery in fracture-/karst-dominated oil
email rdprov@spe.org, or call +1.972.952.9393 reservoirs. Viscous displacement in the matrix is minimal. JPT

Information provided by Thomas Blasingame, Texas A&M U.

26 JPT MAY 2006

Potrebbero piacerti anche