No.

07-9804

In The
Supreme Court Of The United States

In Re Susan Herbert
And Her Minor Sons
Ethan And Christopher,

Natural Born Citizens Denied Justice Absolutely

As Being American Is A Matter Of Faith
Not Of Belief As Life Is Proof,

Petitioners.

Petition For an Extraordinary Writ Of

Prohibition And/Or Mandamus

Susan Herbert
1100 Seagate Avenue 101
Neptune Beach, FL 32266
904.705.6171

April 2008

Questions

Is God actual reality? Is Susan a human being of God and created equivalent to any
man and if so does Marbury apply to her and then all other women?
Was Bush V Gore a failure to act on the part of former President William Clinton and
the voters and was it an illegal violation of separation of power as a Chief Justice may
not uncheck him or herself by negating the whole vote, as the only form of the power
of one the Court may invoke is unanimous and as a legal custodial relationship is
created by the vote and so our custody was awarded to third persons, lawyers, not on
the ballot and whom received not one vote? Did Bush V Gore then harm women as it
has now made their death a valid award of the court and subjected their children to die
for the institutions of government as a bad declaration of war was never addressed? If
so, does remedy and relief exist?

Has the Supreme Court invoked the misleading disclaimer that appearing in the
Supreme Court is not a right i.e. is outside of the 1st amendment right to access the
court in a manner not intended as it has confused its own clerks and has denied
hearing to cases asking federal questions and which are constitutional challenges? Is
this the court unchecking itself? Did it do so once in a manner that harmed women
as it then denied them justice? See Nicholson V Scopetta. Does this then serve to
deny us a Republican form of government?

Is using words to make it seem as if a lie is the truth or to evoke negative emotional
feelings within a person in order to deny the actual reality of a litigant and the actual
facts the domestic violence named in Article 4 Section 4? Does this then serve to
deny us a Republican form of government?

Is the UCCJ unconstitutional as it awards custody of women over 18 to others as they

are attached to their children and as issue and jurisdiction are one and the same, and so
awarding jurisdiction to any place the mother is not or to any other person but the
mother is a violation of equal protection and due process, her liberty rights, her property
rights and her power of one? Does it give judges overly broad power to not hear
difficult or complicated cases? Does it unjustly target women due to the past effects of
discrimination?

Is it treason to organize and collect money to overthrow the executive via

foreignization? Is this protected free speech? Do only mothers and veterans have a
Constitutionally protected right to hold the office of the president while all others have
the privilege of becoming elected to this office?

Is the New York State unwritten policy of never taking any reports of emotional abuse
or battery no matter how severe, in direct violation of the written code of New York, a
policy that unjustly denies women and children their rights? Is the unwritten policy of
PA to ignore or deny the charge of domestic violence in reasoning their decisions the
unjust targeting of women? Is FL's failure to name emotion in its domestic violence
code unconstitutional?

Does a fetus become a person with rights when intrinsic force enters he or she? Does this
occur at 28 days post conception? Does abortion beyond 28 days post conception cease
being the right of the mother as human heart cells begin to beat at three weeks, intrinsic
force enters at four and some brain activity has been detected at five weeks post
conception? If abortion does cease being a right and as a woman does not vote to end her
life if she is innocent of a crime may the states and federal government deny women a
health exception and the morning after pill or any other birth control or any other medical
treatment related to birth for reasons of “safety” or as matter of policy as it is then forcing
her to subject herself to possible injury and death against her will and as it strips her of
any authority over her own person and as these excuses and policies are arbitrary and not
based upon law, precedent or even actual reality but only personal belief?

May the federal or state government deny funding for sex education classes that teach
about birth control other than abstinence as it has been proven this alone does not work,
as it is based on nothing other than religious and personal mores and is due to the effects
of discrimination? Are girls then effected in manner boys are not as they are then subject
to pregnancy, injury and death and so it is a denial of equal protection and due process?
When does a child’s right to know and the common good overtake a parents right as the
child is subject to injury?

Are the powers of physical strength aka liberty and to give birth aka will distinct
equivalent powers and is this the separation of powers that natural law or God delineates
as man and woman? If so, does a man lose custody, control and any property interest in a
child when he loses control of the sperm as we choose to have sex and as a child is
mostly the energy and matter of a woman and God turned into another form? If so, may
the courts hold a mother as most accountable and responsible for that child in our family
courts? Should child support be attached to a woman and not a child as the mother risks
death, is injured and experiences pain via pregnancy and birth while a father does not? Is
it about liability for damages to a woman’s person? Do only enlisted or once enlisted
service members who are fathers have a constitutionally protected right of custody and
property as they too have risked death in defense of the constitution?

Is the rape of women and/or child sexual molestation a crime equivalent to treason as it
annihilates self both physical and emotional and so is death and the overthrow of our law
as it harms not only one person but incalculable numbers of future citizens? Are both
crimes then punishable by death? Is it a violation of separation of power for this mostly
male government to refuse to punish these crimes, to punish them with sentences that in
no way reflect the actual injury, to refuse to sentence perpetrators according to the laws
that do exist, to accord these male offenders early release as policy and refuse to even
prosecute at all as money as cited as reason for allowing rape kits to sit unprocessed thus
making all of us unsafe? Is this taxation without representation? Does it target women
unjustly as they are the exclusive victims of rape and are the majority of child victims and
as due to the past effects of discrimination they have no way to defend themselves or
overcome such injury?

Is gay a protected class? Do gay rights exist in our law? Are gay, heterosexual and bi-
sexual qualities of being human or choices? May the states accord same sex civil unions
the same protection as opposite sex marriages or unions or is there a vested, federal
interest in protecting the birth of new, baby constitutions? Do the exact words “natural
born” legislate this? As does common sense as only women give birth and all new
constitutions – even those labeling themselves gay – began as an egg and sperm?

Is "Don't Ask Don't Tell" unconstitutional as it is based upon appearance alone, as it

prevents women from entering some combat positions namely the office of Commander
in Chief and as it encourages a violation of the law and the honor code - lying about
your person - from a time before you enter the military? Did this policy harm women
and the military, as it is partly responsible for the animosity between women and
military brass as it caused anger, blame and guilt to be placed upon all? Was this policy
a means to appeal to a tiny segment of the population in order to then garner votes,
appeal to a wealthy lobby and mostly to avoid granting women justice as it masked the
actual reality of denying some their protected rights while encouraging the US military
to lie under the guise of “equality”? Is this one of the reasons domestic violence became
rampant within the military as most all citizens did not stop to reason why the last place
you want anyone to lie or to condone it as policy is in the military or the office of
President and Commander? As no person reasoned without gay men we’d have a
military but without women we would not? Has the military unfairly been blamed for a
problem that was created, condoned and promoted by elected officials, by unfit and
unjust men most of whom were or are unwilling to serve, and a two party monopoly
catering and pandering to all but the actual law of the US?

Are children the right of anyone or is all third person intervention in creation
unconstitutional as the moment of the union of egg and sperm formerly a detail of God
may be known and so third person then has responsibility for any child he or she
‘created’, as women feel pain when harvesting eggs but men do not when harvesting
sperm so it is irreparable injury – damages, as no person can know the future and if that
woman will suffer further and if the child will be safe and as it is illegal to recruit for
free or pay even in the form of "donor's fees" and "insurance payments" one woman to
risk her life via pregnancy or birth in place of another as no man can recruit or pay
another man to sign the draft registry and/or risk death in war? Is "life for sale" and the
denial that birth is still dangerous and even deadly one of the direct results of the
discrimination of women?

Do all babies have an inalienable right to a mother and father as it is about the
opportunity existing not whether or not parents are married, stay married or live or
die?

Is custody awarded to any person but the birth mother equivalent to a death sentence, as
it is equivalent to emotional death and if so, must a state then grant automatic appeal
upon any award made to any person not the mother? Was the NY State Court of Appeals
refusal to grant my children and me automatic appeal a violation of equal protection and
due process and is it a policy that favors men while unjustly targeting women and
children and thus treating humans as animals who suffer only from physical injury and
death?
Are private paid for custody evaluations and agreements illegal and a violation of
children's rights as these contracts clearly state the children and not the adults are the
clients and no minor may enter contract, as the persons seeking custody are then made to
pay the evaluators fee and as children have no way to enforce the terms of these
contracts no matter if the parents default or the evaluator defaults or in the worst case, if
even the state and federal government fails them?

May a state create the emergency but then refuse to address it legally by claiming it does
not address emergencies if the person citing the emergency lives out of state and the
state knew this as fact upon the creation of the emergency? May the federal government
create the emergency
but then refuse to address it thus becoming the emergency itself? Is the Patriot Act
unconstitutional as the exigent emergency it is based upon never existed and as the FBI's
criteria for searching persons is not based upon any reasonable suspicion of illegal
activity but only appearances and so it unjustly targets some persons due to things
beyond their control? Is it treason to spy on law abiding Americans in this way, when it
is not a true emergency, and is it slander to call such an act "Patriot" as it is in no way
representative of any founder or founding principle and as that word was used to make it
seem as if it was actually legal and necessary? Did it become emotional assault and
battery? Did it deny us a republican form of government? Does our exactly worded law
naming "safety" make this unconstitutional?

May a citizen sue a sitting federal judge or any other sitting, elected person,
appointed person or unelected person acting as if for liability as a means of
dissolution? If “No” then what recourse is available to a citizen if even the other
citizens fail her?

Is it a denial of reality, a violation of equal protection and due process and the accepted
rules of evidence to allow atheists standing in a court on a claim of "God does not exist"
and to hear these cases when all they bring with them is our exactly worded law naming
a creator and their exactly worded claim but not one piece of evidence of God not
existing and, in actually, plenty of evidence that God does exist and they do believe as
they are praying to the court and so, acting upon a belief in a hope bigger or beyond
their one person as they hope the citizens will volunteer to obey any ruling for them?
Do such claims deny us a Republican form of government as due to our exactly worded
law all federal property is born?

Is it biological fact that women cannot be full-blown geniuses or is this denial of genius
and the lack of very many known and recognized female geniuses actually a realization
of the effect of endemic discrimination of women and of a denial of equal protection
and due process as women have been denied personhood - self - and God and so do not
ever move beyond the will to power and into the will to meaning? Is this same emotion
dumping and specific injury as it was done to their mothers past completion now being
realized among boys as they are falling behind girls for the first time in math and
science?
Did the court err when it considered and awarded something Native Americans
seeking to uphold the Ft.Laramie treaty did not ask for as this is rarely done and was
not warranted due to the unique facts surrounding this case? Is the failure of elected
officials to appoint Native Americans to the Supreme Court or for any Native
American to achieve a place upon our national ballot as a candidate for President a
form of taxation without representation and is it directly due to the past effects of
discrimination and the federal government's insistence that we are sovereign nations in
some ways but then imposing their law upon us as if we are not of the ability to
determine our own destiny and fate? Was Bush V Gore an illegal award of our custody
as women, as citizens and as members of sovereign nations? As the award of money
yet sits untouched, and so Native Americans have proven their resolve and their
intentions in coming before this court, is there any possible remedy and relief to be
had?

Jurisdiction is the Supreme Court as I am challenging Bush V Gore which was a

case of original jurisdiction and which resulted in direct injury to my person, issue
and jurisdiction are the same so it is a constitutional authority case, only this court
can grant me my sought after remedy and relief, I have federal questions including
never before adjudicated questions, the appeals process would cause me and my
children further injury and harm, and pre-existing unwritten, unjust policy that
unfairly targets women who appear pro se keeps me from making even a single
appearance in person in the other federal court so my right to access the court was
denied me and the law was broken to do this. Also neither PA nor NY ever had
jurisdiction as that belonged to FL or the federal government as the most important
records are held by both as we were first harmed and had our constituionally
protected rights violated as Navy dependents and as PA never intended to abide by
the terms of its contract with me and my children due to unwritten policy I was
unaware of when I entered that contract.

In denying me entry, not only was the law broken but the other federal court gave
constitutional authority of myself and the Chief Justice to Congress. When I proved
their reasoning faulty and not our law, they then gave themselves this constitutional
authority by default and effectively stating, ‘Okay, Bush V Gore happened as did Austin
V Herbert and the custody of your person and your children were then awarded to third
parties thrice over by two courts, family district court in two states and the Supreme
Court and in violation of the law but we're not letting you, a living female constitution in
to prove it by testifying.’ They violated precedent set by Marbury in 1803. They support
my claim that we are now a nation of unjust men and not of law as a female citizen is
not allowed any and all remedy and relief, not even redress. As they know they are now
violating the equal protection and due process rights of the Chief Justice and other
Justices as I told them this the federal judges - especially in Jacksonville - are also
preventing myself and the Chief Justice from discharging our duties and so then denying
all Americans justice. This is equivalent to treason.

If you know as fact a case belongs in the Supreme Court as the Supreme Court has
already claimed it via the granting of original jurisdiction to Bush V Gore and you know
this case to be a constitutional authority case that was a violation of separation of power
by the Supreme Court, you must then rule and/or issue an order for the Supreme Court
to hear the case. In over 200 years the Supreme Court has never failed to be accountable
and responsible; it has always been of the ability to review itself without exception. It
might take 50 years sometimes but they’ve done it. It is disgusting that the other federal
judges think nothing of tarnishing this amazing record in order to preserve their personal
status quo and act as if we deny the reality of the current state of our nation it will all
just go away. It will go away. I’ll die someday but nothing will be made better.

I have lived the life that is the case for equivalent rights. I cite the extensive and
lengthy whole of this case, the issue of this case now the most important case since
Marbury and perhaps the most important in world history, the sensitive nature of some
of these issues and the fact that illegal and in violation of the law court activity
occurred in three states and in the federal court and only because I am a woman. I cite
that I was born into this harm as a woman and cannot possibly escape this harm in any
other court. It is an impossible standard for me to meet. I cite so far I have found no
cases of any woman arguing on her own before this court.I cite John Adams telling me
to protest loudly and Justice Stevens advising Citizen, heal thyself! in his decision
regarding Bush V Gore.

I have been violated absolutely and wholly and so I demand absolute and whole
restoration.

Constitutional and Statutory Provisions Involved

The whole law - both governing documents - as I am proving my rights were violated
absolutely and wholly as were my sons and that it is the only elegant legal code in the
history of the world but especially: equal protection and due process; separation of
church and state; Article IV Section 4; separation of powers; Article II Section 1, 1st, 4th,
5th, 12th, 14th, 19th, 20th and 25th Amendments; FL, NY and PA domestic violence and
child abuse code and the Preamble. Appendix E .

Statement of Case

This is a case of original jurisdiction as Bush V Gore was an illegal award of our
custody and an illegal violation of separation of power as the Supreme Court assumed
the power of one, a power clearly granted to the single citizen and the person who is
President only.

To ask the Supreme Court to decide a presidential election holds the Court to an
impossible standard as it then must predict the future and no court can know if the
sitting President will do his duty and if not, can and will another citizen act? Bush V
Gore is a tie, 5 as 1 versus 4 as 1, as it cannot be 9 or the Justices have voted twice for
president and either way the person who is President is to have issued a reasoned
decision of his own and/or an executive order. 9 as 5-4 as 1 is not constitutional in the
case of Bush V Gore as it is about the difference between whole and absolute numbers;
it is one citizen one vote which in this case is equivalent to one body of government
one vote or 9 as 1. That is our law as we are a never-ending chain of command and are
peers; no single vote has more or less power than mine. William Clinton failed to act
as a President decides a tie.

The only form of the power of one the Supreme Court as a whole may ever invoke is
unanimous or a Chief Justice alone, as an abosolute, standing down the President.

A Chief Justice may not negate our vote and thus uncheck himself as the Chief Justice
and the president check and balance one another. They are equivalent legal authorities.
In this way then the people check the Supreme Court; they check and balance the court
via their whole vote vested in the person who is President or by direct legal challenge.

I was illegally denied my vote in 2000. I argue that the election of 2004 was then also
illegal as the low voter turnout made it a violation of separation of power, I was denied
my right to vote again as were others and also my liberty as one had no true choice in
this election even if they were of the ability to vote. Some of the effects of equal
protection and due process being denied my person and denied to other women is that
no woman or minority has been of the ability to become the elected President, unfit
persons have been on the ballot and/or elected and that this office has been openly
bought and sold. Only mothers and veterans have a constitutionally protected right to
this office and we have been denied this right and this privilege and mothers grossly so.

A violation of my rights and a violation separation of power continues to this day as

the power of one, executive order, and the power of one, my vote and then the whole
vote, rests within the Supreme Court as evidenced by Bush V Gore, Schiavo,
Castlerock and Carhart and other rulings concerning women which are all de facto
executive orders that deny us equal protection and due process and self
determination, our safety and hope, all rights, and now this violation of separation of
power serves to deny us our very lives.

It is unconstitutional for George Bush Jr. to invoke moral authority alone, act as
President and levy and collect taxes but then refuse to appoint women to the judicial
bench upon which it counts most, the Supreme Court. Further, an illegal act of war, bad
as the evidence used to support it is no good, has never been addressed and so now our
children are made to die like we are: in defense of the institutions of government and
not the constitutions.

This is a lesson in constitutional law the whole world must come to own for no
constitutional nation should be denying half of humanity their rights and allowing its
judiciary to award the presidential election as that itself, the outcome of the
presidential election or our vote, is an effect of the cause. The cause is birth, both our
founding and the endemic discrimination of women as only women give actual birth
to the federal property that counts for everything – living people - and women have
been denied anything close to fair or just representation from the beginning and are
still denied the legal power of their vote to this very day.
William Clinton failed us first and now there is only one thing for George Bush Jr. to
do or he too has failed us as he did not represent himself before the Supreme Court
yet he then took the presidential oath of office.

I was directly harmed by Bush V Gore as it was a Bush court that denied Scopetta
hearing but ordered the NY Appellate to settle and although our issues were the same
I was not included in this class suit and so was denied any and all justice. It is a Bush
administration that used the unconstitutional Patriot Act against me to search and
seize my intellectual property, it is a Bush administration that rallied Congress for war
and made my sons subject to possible death and without reasoning as the evidence
used to declare this war was found to be no good and it is a Bush administration that
refuses to enforce or create law for women and refuses to name women to federal
judiciary thus ensuring the subjugation of women and their children via federal and
state unwritten policy and taxation without representation.

In my unique case, each and every authority charged with the duty to protect me and my
children from the local municipal level to the federal level failed to do so when I sought
county and state protection in order to escape family violence. They failed to discharge
their duty and/or failed to obey the law always citing woman and/or money as
reasoning. In FL and PA I encountered corruption and unwritten, unjust policy in the
county courts; in NY I encountered corruption and graft in the county and state courts
and the reasoning to deny us our rights was woman and a constantly changing condition
including several impossible standards, all mistaken, patriarchic ideas and beliefs of
female which were imposed upon my person. False testimony, proven false in the
courtroom and so it is on the record, was upheld as truth and fact. This NY county court
ignored or denied over 40 pieces of evidence entered for me and made it seem as if they
did not exist and then even made it seem as if their own court appointed evaluator
interviewed me only once and found for me based upon nothing other than biology and
that is far from actual reality.

The UCCJ was invoked illegally to deny me standing in NY in 1999 and remand the
case to PA who only had ever it as PA broke the law in 1998; the NY court ignored the
law too and that all family members save one lived in NY not PA. One of my children
was even conceived in NY and NY is my native state. The UCCJ was then used once
more but not named exactly to then switch jurisdiction from PA to NY against my will
in 2001 after the third parties wore out their options in PA. Some five years of prior
litigation was ignored as if it did not exist. The states applied the UCCJ to my person
but not to the third parties. I claim this act is unconstitutional as it unjustly targets
mothers and denies them their right of self-determination and their power of one, their
vote. It also denies them their property interest. In the end, not only did I lose custody
of my children to a third party in violation of the law and against all prior decisions of
the federal courts which have set precedent, but every single right named in
the Declaration and Constitution had been violated. The government did not fulfill a
single, solitary stipulation of this federal contract but then the states of Florida, New York
and PA even denied our humanity, a condition intrinsic to my person as a natural born
citizen who is a woman and to my children's persons as natural born citizens who are
boys and clearly defined by the Declaration of Independence.

When the New York State Court of Appeals denied me hearing, it did so in spite of
crimes committed against my person in the lower courts, graft and outright acts that are
illegal such as the assigned Appellate attorney appearing after I fired him, and cited only
woman or “Susan”, poverty or “poor” and intelligence or “academic”as reasoning and
this is blatant discrimination of my person and in violation of our law. New York State
knows full well there are several constitutional issues in my case such as the New York
State child abuse hotline having an unwritten policy that unjustly targets women and
their children: the state does not take any reports of emotional abuse no matter how
severe in direct violation of New York written law, a fact I discovered after the family
court hearing and after the state charged me with a claim of abuse I can and will prove
was created deliberately and was false and when at fair hearing another claim of abuse
surfaced and was then entered, a claim not even made against me but made by my own
self against the third parties. The state told an exact lie, that it sought to protect the
reporter; that is, this state claimed it sought to protect me from me and lodged my own
report against me! Both charges of abuse were later dismissed and incredibly the state's
reasoning was the social worker found the reports based upon stories told about me by
some of the third parties, out of state non-witnesses, of a time before my children were
even born. NY State family code 561 states that a single claim of abuse is not to be held
against a litigant, as it does not itself establish a pattern and the rule of law is that
hearsay is inadmissible as evidence.

The State of New York refused to make any arrangements for me to represent myself at
any point and so we were left defenseless. To this day the states of Florida, PA and New
York and the Counties of Rennselaer and Philadelphia refuse to admit what was done to
my children and me and Rennselaer County recently threw out a petition I attempted to
enter for modification of custody on or around September 20th, 2007. It was not filed and
no notice of it ever being received was issued although a receptionist admitted they had
indeed received it.

The state of PA has never been held accountable and to my knowledge still continues to
ignore domestic violence when reasoning their decisions as policy and the state of
Florida is violating our law by not naming emotion in its family code as it is impossible
to remove emotional abuse from domestic violence. Emotional abuse is intrinsic to
domestic violence. Any state that refuses to acknowledge emotional assault and battery
in its written code or that later invokes unwritten policy to deny a litigant's physical or
emotional reality it is acting unconstitutionally. This unjustly targets women. Denying
the reality of emotional abuse equates women to animals as NY’s Farm and Market Act
Art. 26 states animal cruelty is physical injury alone.
The founders named the emotional assault and battery they were subject to in our
Declaration. Emotional violence occurs first and then becomes physical or sexual
violence and a denial of our rights and even a denial of our identity as human. Other
states may not remove the emotional component from their domestic violence, child
abuse and vulnerable adult codes as emotion is a named right and as emotion is intrinsic
to our humanity.

My son Christopher is yet a named legal unborn person in the state of Florida as his
rights were violated in an unconstitutional manner when the second degree felony
assault charges that I pressed and then the state charged in his name were dropped
without reason and without my consent, without once even speaking to me and without
allowing me to appear because of an excuse as the Florida state attorney admitted to
unwritten, unconstitutional policy: that Florida did not press charges against members of
the Navy. His exact words were “We do not press charges of domestic violence if the
injured spouse is a Navy wife.” If Christopher was not a person who did indeed have
rights then he would not be here today still seeking justice at the age of ten. Also Florida
recently revealed the whole truth: in September of 2007 the state passed a new law as it
admitted that although it always could have pressed charges for strangulation if the
victim did not die and stay dead, it chose not to do so as it was costly. This new law
proves the state used an excuse - money- to deny me justice in 1996 as I was strangled
while pregnant but did not stay dead.

Further, Saul Wachler, former Chief Judge of the NY State Court of Appeals, was
convicted of domestic violence. He plead out and was retired. As this is the case and as I
was born into harm I claim that I had not one chance or a single opportunity from a time
from before my entrance to the courts in 1996 and that my life and the lives of my
children serve to prove this as zero services were offered for our reunification in spite of
the Santowsky V Kramer ruling and as there is no explanation for why or how my life
became what it is: devoid of all family and friends and absent of any means to exercise
my liberty except my rights of dissolution and hope. Not one single person, not any
citizen or authority charged or not charged with the duty in over ten years acted to
uphold the law or enforce it on our behalf.

The states and federal government have developed, implemented and used unwritten,
unjust policy in order to deny women and their children justice and in so doing have
stripped them of their rights and their legal power. Today this is a silent agreement
between public officials and those charged with the duty to protect us; it is the
renegotiation of our law done against our will; it is a predetermined judicial fate we
suffer and it is the negotiation of a negative contract perpetrated mostly by the men
who do make law and who think of nothing more than their ego, their elected or
appointed seat and money instead of living people.

In my case the Declaration and the Constitution have not been good since before I
first voted.
I claim I could not vote for the first time and make a safe, well reasoned decision as I
did not know the truth: that this nation would not uphold the law or apply it to me as I
was female. It is not legal to enter a contract unless both parties are made aware of and
come to own the terms as knowledge. I was lied to by all authorities and my safety was
never secure. My vote has never counted as it has never had legal power. My person,
my emotional self and my actual physical self, was renegotiated against my will several
times over. It yet continues as I write this.

When I was of the ability to pursue justice in the federal court, not possible until April of
2007, I did so. I was denied my right to access the federal court and this was done in
violation of our law. I attempted to enter federal court a second and third time; the federal
court did not want to deal with the massive constitutional challenge my case had become.
It denied and ignored the material facts including over 120 factual documents mostly
county, state and federal documents. It ignored details of a kidnapping then made legal or
enforced via deceitfully gained and in violation of the law court order. The federal court
used words as did the county and state courts, to invoke negative emotions such as blame,
shame, embarrassment, guilt, anger and even fear to make it seem as if I was at fault, as if
I were mentally ill or as if I could not read our law. It sought to prevent me from entering
or trying again. It used words to make it seem as if my claim had no merit. The federal
court did exactly what other courts had done: it denied my physical and emotional reality,
even going so far as to deny my actual birth and my humanity as my birth certificate and
DNA was entered as proof of my American citizenship and my person as a human being.

This is the “domestic violence” named in Article 4 Section 4; it occurs first and then a
Republican form of government is denied us.

The most shocking reality denied by the federal court? The federal court denied Bush V
Gore happened as it did, denying that it was a political question being adjudicated as
some state judges are elected and as other state officials are elected or appointed by the
governor whom we elect, denied that lawyers appeared and argued not Bush or Gore,
denied there was not any actual equal protection or due process issue present other than
what these men and political parties had themselves created as a direct result of actively
denying women and other qualified voters legal power and so their hands were unclean
and denied that George Bush Jr. was a private citizen who is the same as me, a citizen
over 35 and a natural born citizen.

It denied the only difference was birth as I have the ability to give it and Bush Jr. does
not. The federal court compared me to George Bush Jr., Al Gore and John Roberts and
each time tried to make it seem as if I was somehow different or not able and not capable
and so did not have a case or the right to enter federal court challenging both Austin v
Herbert and Bush V Gore and in so doing decided that my life was a valid award of the
court, my custody was a valid award of the court, my children were a valid award of the
court and my vote was a valid award of the court even if this placed me and my children
in harm's way and then kept me there in spite of past federal court rulings which state
clearly the court may not strip from a citizen the ability to prevent future injury from
occurring when addressing harm and in spite of the exact words in our governing
documents.

The federal courts like the state courts create a lie by carefully selecting and placing
words and carefully crafting sentences to make it seem and feel as if a lie is the truth or
seem as if whole events did not happen and then make it real by writing those lies upon a
piece of paper when it is not representative of me or my case. It is perceived reality
versus actual reality as the reader then perceives me to be that thing and believes that lie
to be truth of my case and me. These created documents place blame upon me without
reasoning as if I am the cause of my own injury; they evoke negative emotional responses
and are then used to support and justify an illegal and in violation of the law denial of my
constitutionally protected rights and my human rights. The judges fully expect an
appellate judge to read only the recommendation and order and not my complaint or to
apply this created and faulty reasoning to the order only; they fully expect an appellate
judge to deny me an appearance in person due to the unwritten policies in place and due
to the pervasive, endemic discrimination and subjugation of women.

The federal judges adjudicating my case acted as if they had never read Marbury, that if
they did it did not apply to me and acted as if they had no idea our government was a
chain of command government and did not or would not conceive that if a citizen has had
all of her rights violated and can prove it that there is no authority over her person; she is
the authority, especially if she always invoked moral authority and never once
acknowledged Bush Jr. as the legal president even going so far as to not pay taxes when
she could do so. They acted as if Monell V DSS did not allow me to enforce our law and
so press suit even when I suffered physical injury and would not acknowledge that Olech
V Willowbrook makes this kind of treatment illegal. They refused to acknowledge that
the Judiciary Act of 1789 and 1925 defines my case as one of original jurisdiction as does
new precedent known as Bush V Gore. They refused to acknowledge that Lassiter made
legal representation in custody cases a privilege not a right and that I could not pay for
this privilege in a Philadelphia court and so had to argue on my own in the face of a
predetermined judicial fate due to unwritten, unjust policy while Bush and Gore were of
the ability to hire attorneys as they have not suffered from the past effects of
discrimination as have I, or rather have not suffered to the extent and degree I have. They
would not acknowledge that Bush and Gore avoided the appeals process even though the
appeals process would not have caused them any physical or emotional injury.

The federal court used my very charge, failure to act, against me and did so after citing it
had reviewed the entire record. It used that, “she did not object” to justify the
recommendation of dismissal when I did two times but used other words - motion to
“amend” instead of “object” - and so denied and dismissed me and tried to make it seem
as if it was justified by writing the “entire record” was reviewed as the two dismissals of
my motions to amend as moot wave a red flag. Using my own charge means I am at my
end with the federal court as they have run out of excuses. Using my own charge is proof
to me that the federal court does not want to understand or will not understand what Bush
V Gore and Austin V Herbert are: massive failures to act.
This is the deliberate creation of a false or perceived reality, a blatant lie, as the federal
judges responsible know they are manipulating the English language in order to deny me
my rights.

At this writing a separate suit for liability has been received by the federal court at the
Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville but has not been entered to the system. [Since
illegally denied and dismissed.] More than ten days has passed and when I phoned the
court the person who confirmed my suit was at the court had to ask another person if she
could tell me it had been received. I can only make a reasoned guess as to why it has not
been entered yet: I'm guilty! Guilty! Guilty!

My crime? I took Chief Justice Marshall's advice, knowledge I have had since birth and I
claimed my commission as an American citizen. I acted upon the knowledge that Bush V
Gore opened the door to any person who wished to stand aside or down the Supreme
Court and the President as it removed any and all barriers to the office of the president for
all citizens, even white Christian males as equal protection and due process, the vote, was
our original cause, our original issue which had the effect of creating the original
jurisdiction - the United States of America - and so kicked down the door in one fell
swoop for any American who was or is of the belief they are of the ability and capability
to act as President and Commander in Chief if they could and would press suit on their
own behalf. This person must stand alone as this person is claiming they can and will
fulfill the presidential oath of office, an oath that begins with their own person as they
themselves are a constitution. I preserved, protected and defended myself, my own
constitution first, and then my children by employing the tactics of our founders and then
all of the first patriots.

Even if I had desired an attorney I could not have hired one as no attorney was willing to
take my case and/or I have yet to find an attorney who is of a firm a belief in our law as I.
No civil rights attorney would take a case that did not involve a monetary settlement or
was not a suit against an employer not even the federal government and cited female and
money as reason. No large civil rights lobby or group would take my case as these groups
have partly or wholly unconstitutional agendas and when my reasoning proved this they
then ran away or stopped communicating with me and then even refused to acknowledge
me. I told them: I will not lie or cater my argument to suit your agenda. I will not change
my argument to appease the masses or the two, the Democrats and the Republicans, or
even individual Justices upon the Supreme Court as this is the issue: lawyers lying and
catering their claims and solutions to everything and everyone but what our law actually
says and so persons or groups are given or granted rights that sometimes are not only
merely privileges but are rights that do not even exist in our law and this happens at the
expense of women and children's human rights.

I first was made to act alone and later chose to act alone; to this day this choice is not
mine but one that is forced upon me as I will never acquire the human ability to write
with the technicality of an attorney nor will I ever be of the human ability to follow the
rules exactly. I cannot do what is humanly impossible for me and I cannot force or make
any person do a job or obey a law if they are not willing to do so. I cannot make another
believe in our law.

I acted upon my own faith in the law, our written Declaration and Constitution, and then
my own moral authority and the advice given to me in Bush V Gore by the Justices and
then all prior Supreme Court decisions regarding equal protection and due process as the
citizens are of a mistaken belief and that is that this court does not give advice. This is not
fact as all Supreme Court decisions are advice to and for the citizenry and so George
Bush Jr. and I receive exactly the same advice from the Supreme Court. I willed myself to
know what I did not and to become what I was not. I stopped fighting a county court that
was embroiled in graft as it was pointless and instead, in 2000, began planning my assault
upon the county, state and federal judiciary and the unjust men and now some unjust
women running this nation that do nothing or act against me and my children. I decided I
would not allow them to use money or female as reason when it is excuse. I decided I
would not enter my petition until I could argue on my own behalf and due to my children
being abused I had to wait until they would never need to testify, only want to testify if
safe. Because of a physical injury and lack of resources I must argue orally as I cannot
prepare a brief, and I knew I needed to be of the ability to argue all equal protection and
due process issues and then all constitutional law and so had to teach myself due to the
past effects of discrimination of women and due to what this now endemic domestic
violence has done to Americans:

Not one other citizen recognized that late Chief Justice Rhenquist gave standing to pieces
of paper and lawyers not the persons vying for the office who were to take the
presidential oath and did so when he knew they had no equal protection and due process
issue as a similar situation has occurred in the past and never went to the Supreme Court.
The electoral college yet exists; Congress failed to act and so did our Governors as they
do have the power of one and could have sued as a third party on behalf of their states
citizens as they are a states legal custodian and no single citizen was ever likely to have
the ability to sue. Neither Bush nor Gore defended their own constitution and instead
allowed lawyers, snakes, to whisper in their ear and to lie to the Supreme Court and the
American public by creating a brand new claim, one that would set new precedent, in
order to gain access to the federal judiciary and do so at the highest level possible as a
case of original jurisdiction. These snakes made it seem as if their claim was heard upon
appeal from the Florida courts and was legally sound; they made it seem as if there was
an equal protection issue and due process issue present when there was not, only issues
and problems these men created for themselves over the course of 200 years by acting to
deny legal voters their right and by acting to keep women from the offices of legal power.

They did not sue the United States as the defendant as if only they had a right to this
office and only they - moneyed, white, Christian, Republican, Democratic, males - were
able and capable to act as President and Commander in Chief of this nation. Lawyers
knowingly and willingly attempted to deceive Americans by doing so; lawyers and others
were awarded legal power. Bush and Gore themselves participated in the creation of their
own problems regarding the counting of ballots: the legal, qualified voters denied their
vote, a two party monopoly, the illegal use of money and the hanging chad but then
sought court relief.

Not one other American knew that this was a word game designed to make it seem as if
Bush and Gore had standing and was intended to mask the actual reality of a political
question being adjudicated for the first time as an issue of equal protection and due
process and to negate the actual issues present such as those above and including liberty
denied and duty, as in failure to fulfill it and criminal activity committed by our elected
and/or appointed officials and by private citizens, privileged persons who act upon the
belief they will not get caught or not get punished if caught and who lobby for illegal and
in violation of the law policy which favors them at our expense.
The lawyers intended it to seem and feel as if George Bush Jr. had constitutional
authority which is actual legal power over our persons when he does not. They intended
to confuse the citizens as no person needs to enter a court only to leave with “proof” of
their victory, a piece of paper, as paper is not our living government. These dishonest
lawyers wanted the citizens to perceive that piece of paper as actual reality in spite of
what our exactly worded law states and what prior court rulings state exactly and in spite
of all firmly established precedent. The piece of paper is real; an actual piece of paper
with Bush V Gore upon it exists. The decision is reality; Bush V Gore is an actual court
ruling that I have read concerning the ballot recount. However, nothing makes that
decision actually legal or actually constitutional. The actual reality is it wasn't legal then
and it isn't legal today as it is a violation of separation of power. The lawyers knew the
label “Supreme Court” would cause the people to perceive it as legal and constitutional,
our law, when it is not.Instead of understanding Bush V Gore for what it was, Americans
became angry and felt powerless; they blamed the Supreme Court and they blamed
George Bush Jr. Their perception of reality and of our law was and is skewed. What they
perceive is not actual reality. Although many may share this perception of powerlessness
and anger, that does not make it correct or fact. They may be angry; I believe their
testimony. What they should feel instead is liberty denied and it should fuel them; they
should feel anything but powerless. Every American alive might and could actually feel
angry and powerless; that does not make it a fact of our law as we volunteer to obey
decisions from the federal court just as we volunteer to disobey them. That is liberty and
that is our exactly worded law.

Bush V Gore itself was a case of the domestic violence named in Article 4 Section 4
occurring, perpetrated by lawyer-like snakes and an irresponsible press calling itself and
its placing of blame, its blurring of the facts and its catering to political agendas
“journalism”; it was aided by a Congress and the citizenry not willing to act and refusing
to uphold and enforce the law, otherwise known as doing their job and/or exercising their
rights that then served to deny all a Republican form of government. It was and is an
absolute violation of our law as it violated the whole vote and thus our whole law.

This violation is not the fault of the Supreme Court and neither is the current state of the
nation the fault of George Bush Jr. It is the fault of a past president, Congress, snakey
lawyers and the citizens not fulfilling their honor bound duties in spite of most of them
possessing full knowing and/or the ability to read.
As for snakes, I mean lawyers, the Supreme Court ruled in Lassiter no person has this
right, legal representation, when the issue is custody in our family courts and the
Supreme Court is our national family court and our custody was and is the issue. The law
is that a real, living person takes the presidential oath of office not a piece of paper and
not a lawyer representing that person. Lawyers know this as fact and have a professional
standard to meet that the average citizen does no Bush Gore themselves knew one of
them would take this oath. Yet lawyers argued and brought a case without standing to the
federal court; Bush and Gore were granted rights and privileges no other citizen has and
that I was denied, and not one other citizen acted except to whine, place blame and
accuse the Supreme Court of politicization.

I knew actual reality was that Justice Rhenquist and the others by hearing Bush V Gore
effectively liberated all Americans from the created barriers now in place - from the
snakes, from the money, from the political parties and from the made up rules - that stand
in our way and that keep us from this office unfairly and unjustly and so set new
precedent: the Supreme Court bit the snakes right back by allowing each American to
duly process themselves and so sue for the equal opportunity to become the elected
President.

Bush V Gore violated the law absolutely and in my life Austin V Herbert violated all of
my rights absolutely; in my case, both of these decisions then combined to cause me
physical and emotional injury and to deny me each single right named and inherent in our
law except for my one last remaining specifically named right, the right of dissolution, a
right that takes several forms such as suit in court, serving via war or birth, becoming
elected your own self, lobbying for new law or your one vote and a right never accorded
but inherent in our law which is the right of hope, as the Supreme Court resolved the
extreme test of chain of command theory Bush V Gore was and is by leaving a light on
for me and all the citizens.

The Supreme Court could not predict my situation would be the exact result of Bush V
Gore but they had clues that at least one woman would come to be so harmed and I am
certain they knew exactly what Bush V Gore was and is. I am sure they knew Bush V
Gore was a power play and a power grab by Chief Justice Rhenquist and was deliberate. I
am sure they knew then and know now that a Chief Justice is equivalent to a President in
legal power as they check and balance one another and so to negate the whole vote is to
then uncheck yourself or to snatch the power of one, executive order and the single vote
from the citizens as we choose in whom to vest the legal power of executive order via the
single vote which then becomes the whole vote. We, the people, check and balance the
Supreme Court in two ways, by our vote and by direct legal challenge or lawsuit. I am so
sure as the clues are everywhere. What clues did they have? The same exact ones I
myself had: all prior decisions of the Supreme Court, their own decisions regarding Bush
V Gore, their illegal and in violation of the law invocation of per curiam so that it could
then be one whole disagreement and not one whole unanimous decision and then all of
American and all of world history. Plus I am sure I will find some math courses on their
resumes.
In essence, all decisions of the Supreme Court are a sort of “per curiam” as it is a one
whole court upholding the whole law via a whole majority. A presidential election must
be decided either a lone, absolute one, the Chief Justice standing down the sitting
President (in which case our government and law has been overthrown as the President
must then be a criminal if he cannot or will not obey the law or, we have a rogue Chief
out to make himself a king via consolidation of power but in both cases we have 300
million citizens who failed) or 9 as 1, the whole court upholding the whole law via a
whole majority aka the whole vote. In this way 9 as 1 is a whole one and an absolute one
as it is a matter of absolute law: one man one vote or, one body of government one vote.
This is why actual “per curiam” is not used in this court as the math does not always add
up due to this very issue, the election of a President aka constitutional authority, and as it
is inherent or implied only issues of social importance or constitutional challenges are
heard here. As it stands Bush V Gore is an unresolved, unrecognized tie. 9 as 5-4 as 1 is
not legal or good math as it is actually 9 as 5-4 as 2, 5 as 1 for Bush and 4 as 1 for Gore
or 1 versus 1 – a tie.

This door must not remain open as wide as it is now for it makes me and any American
citizen a sovereign nation unto their self, a state acting upon their own and able to do
anything the actual President can as long as they did not support Bush V Gore in any way
as it makes us his equal in legal power as you cannot hold us to a contract you broke and
Marbury says one must defy illegal orders or be liable for damage. I did not obey and I
did not pay taxes except when forced to by an illegal order of the court and by illegal
seizure. As I own the argument that places me in the office of the President and a second
argument that also places me in the office of Commander in Chief so no authority is
above me.

Via original and unique legal argument and legal theory due to the unique facts of my
life, I possess the most legal power and the most moral authority, even more moral
authority than Bush Jr. as no President ever has more moral authority than an active
service member or a mother no matter what the state of our nation is – even war. Also, he
has daughters not subject to the draft while I have sons who are subject to the draft and
death in war.

This then leaves all citizens in legal limbo as our law is not a valid contract and no
election involving my person is valid until it is addressed. An election awarded only
because others failed is not legal if even only one person acts to defy authority and to
uphold the law; war declared upon bad evidence is not legal and will only continue and
cannot possibly be “won” as no military is just if they are made to fight and kill without
reasoning. The law is that one must then present new or other evidence or revoke the
declaration as that bad declaration is nothing but an institution and so if we do not
address it legally we are then dying for an institution of government, the piece of paper
itself and Congress - the thing it is and does - not the people who are Congress and so not
in defense of any constitutions. Injury and harm will continue as Bush V Gore and some
of its effects then cause a feeling or idea of injustice and anger to fester and the citizens
then feel as if they have a right to violate our law even when it is not a case of self
defense and/or that they have no choice and must remain victims of the state. The citizens
stop believing in our law and stop believing that it applies to them and so do not act upon
what they do not believe or perceive as reality.

What citizen would act to enforce or uphold a law that they do not believe is real for
them? or act to enforce a law that does not seem or feel as if it protects and empowers
their own person? The effects of the endemic discrimination of women and Bush V Gore
serve to render our citizens willing victims, as their spirit is broken. I am the only
example they have of a person acting on their own in spite of the odds and so they tell me
that I am delusional, I am not being truthful, that it is impossible to have had my life
unfold as it did, that I do not know our law or cannot apply it correctly and that if I am
ever heard in court that I will be silenced or denied justice as they assume the Supreme
Court is actually is all those false things it has been labeled: political, corrupt, selfserving,
unjust, unfair and intent on trashing and violating our law for their own personal gain or
to enhance their egos. They willingly believe the lies they are told and believe the
emotions they feel as facts of other people and so have become victims, citizen lambs to
the slaughter and do not uphold the honor bond.

The one thing our founders were not is willing victims. The one thing our founders were
was accountable and their names upon the Declaration support this. The other thing they
actually were? Responsible, for when their original Articles of Confederation did not
work they invented a new form of government from scratch and then lived it out as real
even when it was seemingly impossible and even when it was painful to do so. They
admitted to their mistakes more quickly than they claimed their successes. The lives of
Washington, Adams and Hamilton support this as their specific acts and specific words in
specific places with specific people serve to prove their personal beliefs as authentic and
genuine or facts of them. They are men who found themselves upholding the honor bond
and fulfilling duty to the point it was physically and emotionally uncomfortable for them
at times and even though it took Hamilton's life. They did so for those of us alive today.

I, my own self, am proof the first patriots lived and were actual humans, real people alive
in or around 1776 and 1787. I, my own self, prove they acted as they did and that what
the historians say happened did actually happen and is fact. No photographs exist to
prove they lived; no paper is proof of them. No museum, created record or title in a book
of history makes the words on any document the truth. The words are myth unless lived
out as true belief as fingerprints, photographs and words prove nothing not even actual
life. It is I, Susan, acting on her own that is proof as the fingerprints our founders left
behind are all over me and inside my person and have become my faith. I, Susan, am
proof that our American story now a legend and soon to become a myth unless I am heard
was and is history.

I seek not to dissolve our law but to dissolve instead a shadow government of people who
have mistaken beliefs of our founders, this nation, this law, this world and themselves as
Americans as anytime a person gives away their legal power and moral authority they are
then a shadow government as we are supposed to be a living government and living law
of people, thriving and striving and not a semi-dead or even half-awake government. To
be half-awake is to be a shadow of our former selves and a shadow of what our founders
intended for us. To choose the easy road and to make the easy decisions, the comfortable
ones only, or to fail to act, is to be a shadow of who and what you might become; it is to
use only a sliver of your power as a person. It makes us all ghosts of the founders instead
of the living embodiment of their spirits.

I am not a ghost.

I alone among 300 million plus citizens understood perceived reality was not actual
reality and that the Chief Justice and other Justices were dangling a shiny, red apple
directly in front of our faces. I thought to plunder history just as our founders did as that
was the one and only example I had - our founders - and so knew that snakes do not
reason as they have no emotion and are cold blooded; they are after “I” and never “We”
as We the people all appeared in court that day and lost as a reasoned decision for a
runoff election and an executive order against all able bodied citizens directing them to
fulfill duty and vote does not pay. I recalled Genesis: “And I will place enmity between
you and the snake and you will strike at his head while he strikes at your heel and kills
your children.”

I witnessed the snakes go for our Achilles heel, our Supreme Court, or the appearance of
possessing constitutional authority over our humanity and so I struck back in conjunction
with the Supreme Court in order to save myself and then my children as I knew after the
Supreme Court is the President or my one person as that is chain of command theory. I
knew without a unanimous decision the Supreme Court was opening a door not closing
one as any dissent throws it to the people embodied by the sitting President and if he and
all others fail it then goes to the lone person who caught it when Justice Rhenquist threw
it: I, Susan.

A lawyer is out for his or her own self and these snakes used the taxpayer funded federal
court to deny us the vote; it was cause and effect doubling back in such a way we
ourselves began eating our own tail and almost unfounded ourselves as it served to deny
all Americans their rights and taxed all of us unjustly as no person can trade upon tax
dollars in order to be awarded the most legal power in this nation and possibly the most
moral authority in time of actual war as that is then trading upon our humanity. Our
Revolution was fought to win the vote thus securing our humanity and making it
inviolate.

By even showing up in an American federal court, the only legitimate human rights court
in theworld, and asking for a decision that this power be directly awarded to an
individual, a decision that is a piece of paper that was never needed as it itself an
institution of government as it proves nothing unless lived out as true belief and as our
law is already clear on this issue, it then is an unconstitutional dollar transaction. It is an
absolute violation of the honor bond. Any court action that negates the vote of a
presidential election is a tax dollar issue and is an automatic constitutional authority case
as the issue, our humanity or the vote, is also the jurisdiction, our humanity or our living
government and living law as in our human rights or national family court, our Supreme
Court. Human beings consent to be governed; the government and the law derive their
power from human beings. The issue is humanity as our founders defined it, claimed it
for themselves and for us and then made it inviolate with written law; jurisdiction is
humanity as our nation is still the only nation with an actual, real, living government and
living law of people.

We are an actual living, physical power of people.

All of our elected and appointed judges and other officials are paid; all court activity is
paid for via taxes and/or fees. To bring a presidential election to the courts is dicey; you
are not only adjudicating a political question due to the endemic discrimination of women
and the unique circumstances surrounding Bush V Gore but also adjudicating the honor
bond, an issue resolved by the federal ruling The Declaration and federal precedent
known as The Revolution. You are solving nothing as to even get here the citizens must
have failed to act and failed to fulfill duty and as it is impossible to improve upon
anything that is elegant.

Our dollar is honor bound; like our law it is between a citizen and God and then the other
citizens. It has no tangible standard; it is good only because we live and work to support
it and promise to make good on it. We have never once failed to honor our money or pay
our debts from the time of our Revolution when we managed to pay off almost $12
million dollars in foreign debt and about $65 million in citizen or state debt. People lived
and died upon this loan. We promised to pay and did. That’s an honor bond. Our
American dollar is a living currency then; we are the only nation that has such a currency
and we are the only nation to define it as a power of the elected Congress, or in other
words, a power of the people as it derives its value from the single vote and then the
whole vote just as our law does. Like the whole vote, we volunteer to work to make the
dollar good just as we volunteer to obey the law, then volunteer to obey executive orders
and obey decisions of our Supreme Court but also volunteer to act and even disobey if
any of the actions or decisions by the people in these positions of legal power are
unconstitutional. So then, the citizens along with our right to vote and our right to hope
float our dollar as a living currency.

The standard which supports our currency is not gold or silver but the Declaration and the
Constitution, lived as true belief or as faith by the people.

To use tax dollars in this way then is an absolute violation of the law unless all Americans
receive justice. The award of a presidential election may not violate any person's right,
most especially and importantly their single vote. Our vote is actually sacred as it was
won and is written in the blood of all who came before us and in our very own blood.
That exact word, sacred, was used by our founders and is in the last line of the
Declaration.

All of history is written in iron gall ink, which is human blood. We are born in blood, in
actual birth and war.
Bringing a presidential election into federal court imposes an impossible standard upon
the snakes: you are demanding of them that they tell the truth, they take no money, they
do not publicize their names, they refuse to press frivolous or harmful suits and that they
share. As snake-like lawyers cannot do this as evidenced by the state of our nation, you
are then counting upon the Supreme Court to do its job if the litigants seek more or other
redress if they are dissatisfied or if their snakes seek to overturn or amend our law in a
way not legal with motivation other than the common good and so encourage the litigants
to go forward.

While the Supreme Court can and will do its job and did in hearing and deciding Bush V
Gore they cannot accurately predict if anyone else will and cannot accurately predict the
details of God, the exact conditions of the future. The people are holding the Supreme
Court to an impossible standard then. They are not appointed to act as a citizen's guardian
or to prognosticate the future; they merely reason how the law is to be applied in a just
manner and they sometimes make mistakes as it is all experiment for us as we are first
and we are still unique. Our actual lives, the physical reality and the emotional reality, are
the results of this experiment and so We, the people learn by living this American life.

Sometimes the Supreme Court designs a mistake or knowingly and willingly, acting with
deliberation, breaks the law on purpose or upholds the law as best it can but in a way not
legal but within the spirit of the law or not supported by any precedent and/or airtight
reasoning given the unique circumstances as some legal situations have never arisen
before in all of human history. That is why the Supreme Court invokes secrecy; it is based
upon the founders discussing our future in the closed-door session that began the
Constitutional Convention and upon James Madison's notes of the Convention being kept
from us in the beginning so that we could and would learn to do it on our own.

Practice or trial and error makes an institution of government into a Constitutional

nation.

In reasoning Bush V Gore the Justices invoked the best interest standard and did not
award us what was not asked for but instead addressed the award in question even
acknowledging the case was without merit: the award of the legal power of the office of
president, a political question as we are a living political system and so it is all political.
Politics is intrinsic, especially in a system that derives its power from one person one
vote. It is a valid award of the court if and only if the decision is unanimous and if and
only if the persons seeking the award represent themselves. No citizen came forward and
claimed third party standing or pressed suit after the fact; no extraordinary citizen came
forward and pressed suit for a violation of their rights and a violation of the whole law as
these conditions set by precedent and exactly written in our law were not met.

Bush V Gore is a federal question that began and ended at Marbury; there is an actual
equal
protection and due process issue to be adjudicated. The federal question is now and was
then this one: Is Susan a human being, of God and created equivalent to any man
and if so does Marbury then apply to her and to all other women?
Claiming our commissions and acting as if we are American, acting out our true belief in
the law is the purest and most just form the invocation of Marbury takes; it is the most
ideal realization of our law for a citizen to pursue justice by attempting to uphold and
enforce our law and/or secure their rights via action in the federal court. We choose to act
and exercise our rights and that is will and liberty: Will is the action of America, liberty is
the emotion of America and justice is the echo of America.

I now invoke another unwritten policy of the courts that I have been the victim of besides
those I previously mentioned, unconstitutional if invoked in district family court - first
one to the bar wins - or in this case: no other American may press this claim for legal
power and no other American is entitled to any monetary damages but only other means
of remedy and relief that is constitutional. I win as I alone knew to think while Adam and
a talking snake might indeed poison me and did, the Supreme Court would not and as I
was so very hungry for justice I then made a beeline straight for that apple and took a
great big bite. I thought, “I accept your special invitation to appear. I have my very own
Constitutional issue but will accept a special invitation.” I volunteered to serve again.
What did I win? Knowledge that gave me actual legal power and actual physical power,
regardless of ever receiving a decision from the Supreme Court.

I am a Native American and I am from NY. I am a woman. I know all about apples as I
am white on the outside but red on the inside and so am not considered an “apple Indian”,
one that is red on the outside and white on the inside. I know all about appearances being
deceptive as I am not what I appear to be in any way and I know all about emotion and
discrimination. I am a student of the world; I know all about law, numbers, rocks, snakes,
trees, wood, wooden horses, war, apples, golden apples, gold itself, the vote, judgment,
Paris, chaos, discord and I especially know about lawyers acting as if they are attorneys
and acting as if they care about our law or us when they only care about their own person.

I did not blame the Supreme Court or Bush Jr.; instead I aimed my slingshot squarely at
the lawyers and those breaking our law or not acting and took responsibility for my own
self as I know the sin, the actual sin the snake enticed Eve to commit and that Adam
participated in of his own free will was looking outside of your own person for power and
placing blame and so creating without an ethic, all mistakes our founders did not make as
millions of people all subjects of various world governments throughout history made
and repeated these mistakes so the founders did not have to make them nor did we.

I knew the snake or Adam had to make Eve feel badly first, and what would make her
believe what a snake told her was fact without question? What made her even think to
reason with a snake albeit a talking snake? Why did she not run the other way? What
would cause Adam to hurt her feelings, even accidentally? Innocence. Ignorance. They
were first so they had no example. God created us as perfect absolutes. Birth wasn’t
punishment; Eve always had the ability. She always possessed the power. Adam had
liberty and she had will. God said, You do not need to go down that road.
Did Adam ever tell her the terms of our contractual obligations in Eden? In The Koran,
God told him not her. But, did God ever tell Adam as Eve was a stipulation that was
added at a later date? Why would God need to tell Adam as Adam is the only human who
ever saw God and so, as he was first, had proof, his own walking, talking person, and his
actual experience of God, and Eve, that God was real and THE authority? I think it is
inherent if you’re Adam that God is real and God is the authority. And, you own the
knowledge: God made you then told you. God created us in his image but somebody’s
got to be in charge of creation; somebody’s got to decide it’s time for the universe to be
born and to die. People will never be that - God; peerage is all we can achieve. But we
want it. Don’t little kids still run straight for the shiny red off limits apple every time?
The hot stove? Don’t we pay a price? Doesn’t mom say, “I, the authority on hot stoves,
told you not to touch it”? Don’t we say, “I didn’t listen to my mother and I got burned?”
Don’t some kids grow up and do things like blow up buildings or set fires for fun? Don’t
some of us test the limits of power and insist on violating the separation of power until
we actually go to jail or die?

In Eden we broke a contract! Then we renegotiated the terms as God did not find us at
fault! We weren’t held liable! Like a child, we tested our world as we did not believe our
parent. Eve doubted herself, Adam doubted others. Eve was born knowing “We” while
Adam was born knowing “I”; Adam had to learn “We” and Eve had to learn “I”. We
violated the separation of powers. But, God judged it was absent of motivation and intent
as God’s the best and only judge of his work. We paid a one time fee – exit from Eden -
for defaulting and then were taxed. Birth and work – both physical labor – is a tax. God
gave us something; we defaulted. We do not then benefit unless...we didn’t own the
knowledge of the terms! Nothing is ever actually “free”. It’s is the nature of human
beings to take anything that is free for granted as God created us as willful and liberated
not willful and free. It wasn’t ever “free” will. We had terms; we had THE law and that
hasn’t yet been amended in over 4.5 billion or so years as THE law is elegant as is our
own.

Genesis says: We became “knowing”! Emotion!!! Deliberation!!! Adam and Eve were
lawyers who represented their own persons in Eden. They legally reasoned themselves
out of the garden, our first court of law, by making their own persons the exception to the
law! God’s verdict? EVE WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY. Evidence? Proof? God clothed
both when he dismissed them, telling them: I will always be here for you. Eve received
the same exact treatment as Adam and this promise was made to both not to Adam alone.
What? Adam’s rib was a mistake? God makes mistakes? Logically, if Eve is a mistake or
less than then Adam must be too as he was first and Eve came from him. Am I to believe
God made a mistake and gave Adam one rib too many or that something defective came
from Adam’s matter and energy? God and Adam’s rib? That’s called descent with
modification! It is also something else!

Are we repeating ourselves? People live history; history does not repeat itself – people
do. The founders did not make this mistake. They understood natural law. So do I. God
made snakes as perfect absolutes too. Actual snakes do not deliberate anymore than they
reason. Actual snakes are free. The snake then was a gift like all of Eden, an equal
opportunity for Adam and Eve to equally protect and duly process their spiritual or
emotional selves by denying their person what they never needed to begin with if only
they believed in the law; if only they had faith in the law of God. In order to do that you
must first believe in yourself and then in another. We had to fall so we could climb back
up and in so doing come to own as faith a true belief in God, in ourselves and in each
other. We had to come to violate our law absolutely so that we could then own as faith a
true belief in our Declaration and Constitution, in our power of one, a vote, and in the
whole, We the people. It was accident by design, God as architect of all creation and this
universe.

Original sin, both The Fall and Bush V Gore, was a safety issue; it was a
Constitutional crisis.

I believe in myself. I believe that I am able and capable of anything the President and
Chief Justice are able and capable of doing. I have faith in the law of America and in the
people beginning with my one person. I know the law and heard Bush V Gore and felt
powerful. I knew it was a gift. I understood it to be a way out of my own personal unjust
situation and later realized it was this nation's way home. I worked my own way
backwards as first I had the whole then the pieces. I had to be unduly processed by this
nation to then duly process myself! I did not expect to come to own what I have as a
result of eating that apple. Upon realizing that I could reason my life from a time before I
was created, I woke up one morning and I made this decision: If I must become the Chief
Justice or President in order to save myself and my children then I will.

I am the only American who watched and felt the Supreme Court drive the snakes out of
Eden this time around and consciously decided to act and help them as I know the truth
or a lie when I see, feel or hear it. I know justice and I know injustice. I know our law. I
have even seen it in person. Some truths are universal. I know it to be inviolate and
absolute and so felt empowered as our law is elegant and is an actual form of energy. I
invoked the idea of the founders and then conspired with them, with the Court and with
Bush Jr. in order to then conspire with the universe and so survived the snakes and the
conditions of my life until I could outwit them at their own game by telling the exact
truth of my life and our law and enter my actual whole case and not a self serving piece
of it or a lie. I turned the “I” back into "We" and in so doing defined the parameters of this
universe legally and solved not only my own problem but our nation's problem, as my
power of one, my one vote, becomes the power of the whole vote and that is all the moral
authority and legal power I will ever need.

Today I know another truth: I am the extraordinary circumstance no court or person

charged with the duty to uphold and enforce our law considered. I am what was so
unbelievable that they could not conceive of being or existing, and I stand in their way of
violating our law and then slithering away with it. I am the condition they seek to change
or reason away and they cannot so they choose to focus on outside things even if they
must manufacture a lie. I, Susan, was, is and am the event horizon.
The actual real difference between my person and Bush or Gore is: I am a woman, I have
clean hands, I have an actual issue and I am prepared to argue upon my own behalf as I
can and will preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. I can fulfill the presidential
oath of office. No snakes required, needed or wanted.

The federal court seemed to have a case of the apoplexy of yore and acted as if it was
afraid of George Bush Jr. and afraid of John Roberts and acted as if it could not conceive
of a woman fully invoking the law and acting upon her belief in it; the federal court not
once considered my rights or the rights of my children and refused to believe that a single
citizen could and would will herself to power in spite of the odds against her. It denied
and dismissed me as not possible and to do so it had to refuse me any appearance in
person and it had to break our law. It had to deny me, deny my children, deny our law and
deny our founders.

I never wanted or needed the things the judiciary seeks to keep from me and only came to
ever need one of them because of my children. Some of these things are: my printed
name upon a decision issued by the Supreme Court, an attorney, my printed name upon
the ballot, maleness, a brief, the actual title, the actual desk in the actual office, the
approval of Congress, the approval of a judge, the approval of the third parties, money
and the actual seal upon the actual stationary. This was never about those things as they
are not for sale and they are not theirs to award, not even their own approval, as we are
not judges but Justices in America. Those things are not the issue. The courts do not
decide who is or isn't entitled to human and constitutional rights as remedy and relief as
our law is exact and absolute and names only two qualifications: age and natural birth,
and that person who is a live birth or commission with the Supreme Court then reasons
what our law does or doesn't state is a Constitutionally protected right versus a privilege,
and that person then upholds our law as inviolate. Until that person is 18 parents do the
reasoning and enforce and uphold the law for that citizen. Human rights should never
have become a valid award of the court as we are born into them as ours and as none of
these outside things make you human or make you the president; you, your own self
make you, your own self, president of your own life. The president is our peer not a
special being that is more human than we are or more God-like than we are. We killed
that mistaken belief in 1776, made that death a reality in 1783 and then legislated our true
belief - our humanity and hope born of a creator or the vote - in 1787.

To deny over half of humanity their human rights, their constitutionally protected rights
and most privileges and then to deny them any and all remedy and relief without
reasoning is absolutely unconstitutional; and if women are made to die against their will
and so are their male and female children it then becomes genocide. To kill women and
then to kill their children without reasoning is to target your own species for extinction as
America alone is the keeper of this gate: written law equivalent to the unwritten law of
God or the universe. Because of our unique law we guard humanity and creation itself.
The issue is our humanity and the intrinsic power of it that we are born into as our
inalienable right.
Checking recent past decisions of the federal court I noticed a pattern and was of the true
belief
unwritten, unconstitutional federal policy also existed that harmed women. I then invoked
Marbury in writing, told the federal court that I had already filed in Jacksonville and that
I was seeking entry and could not wait for my local court to decide it would accept actual
reality and obey the law as it could not get past the idea of female. I told them I had
written to all 100 Senators as I must according to Article II, the 12th and the 20th
amendments and Marbury, as well as to several representatives and that all had failed to
fulfill their duties. Four answered with two telling me that I was not a constituent and one
of those was a senator from NY. Another one sent me to the state election commission so
it was failure to act, things that Bush was not made to do and/or things that violate chain
of command theory.

The federal court refused to acknowledge that I was the authority as I alone possessed
this argument and as my moral authority was even greater than Bush's as all citizens have
the most moral authority to act upon their own behalf and as he had no true legal
authority or my consent so that I was equivalent to the Supreme Court in legal power and
moral authority until or unless this court denied me hearing. They did not cite that I had
been truthful and instead stated that I was “deceitfully” “blanketing the federal courts” - a
lie. “Deceitful” implies motive; if I made no appearance I gave no testimony to my
motive or my intentions. That word implies “guilt”. No judge would know this at all. This
then is a lie. It’s a tactic of abusers and controllers named in medical literature. It’s all
over the history books too known as “communism” “dictatorship” and “hereditary rule”.

Invoking Marbury in writing once again, I then cited my claim over and sent it in to about
10 other federal courthouses without stating I had previously entered federal court but
stating an actual injury directly due to Bush V Gore and stating at least one of the
unwritten policies that unjustly target women along with supporting evidence that rose to
proof. Again it was the same. I did this deliberately and with full knowing in order to
prove unwritten, unconstitutional federal policy exists. I did not send in every single
petition out of about twenty as I purposely did not include a poor person’s petition so I
could pick and choose as federal courts return any that do not contain a petition of
indigence or a check and so, sent back only enough to prove this policy against women or
minorities appearing pro se and who cite claims of a denial of equal protection and due
process did indeed exist.

I am of the belief that this is partly due to the Supreme Court stating it is above or outside
our right to access the courts by stating a hearing in this court is not our right, Bush V
Gore and other recent rulings of the Supreme Court. That is, the other federal courts and
the other authorities such as Congress are of the mistaken belief that the Supreme Court
seeks to actively subjugate women and that it will never grant equal protection and due
process to women. It is also because male clerks within the Supreme Court do not know
our law and/or act upon mistaken beliefs of women and in so doing deny the Justices the
fruits of their labor and violate the Justices' rights of equal protection and due process.
I have stood all down in more than one state and upon a federal level and so I am now at
John Roberts and George Bush Jr. I am like Thurgood Marshall and like he I am ordering
you to stand aside or to stand down as that is what this kind of constitutional challenge is;
it is an order to stand aside me as my equals or to stand down as no person who is acting
upon the mistaken belief that we are not equivalent, that we are not equal but distinct due
to the outside conditions of our person which we do not control is just or capable of
acting justly. It is fact: there is something the Supreme Court does not know and so it
cannot possibly act on behalf of humanity nor can George Bush Jr. until they do know it.

I know this specific thing as I deliberately, knowingly and willingly threw my own
person into the breech as the founders once did and as they were my only example as all
others abandoned the cause long, long ago and as no other nation has written law
equivalent to ours. I had only my own person to rely upon. The cause or reason my
family and the courts cited was never actually female, money or me, Susan, but their own
persons as they have been creating without an ethic or giving in to those who do for as
long as I can recall. They have parroted beliefs they are taught but do not possess
reasoning and do not possess life experience, no proof of life, as they have never acted
upon faith alone. They use those words - mother, poor, drugs, abusive and ideas or
judgmental labels and will go so far as to cite God at times - but they are excuses and
justifications as that is all they can be for one who has no faith in anything. World history
supports this. It is the very thing our founders sought to escape. Now those charged with
the duty to guard our law and all of our constitutions also create without an ethic and in
so doing negate the idea of the patriots: people who were willing to give up their very
lives to accord me that one vote so that I could come to own the actual energy of an
individual human being.

Handicapped by a physical disability and by my intelligence as it seems to be above or

beyond the other citizens, or at least my willingness to learn what I do not know and my
willingness to act upon that knowledge is, and never accorded any accommodations, I
attempted to enter the Supreme Court. This is my fifth attempt since October 1st. I have
yet to be filed in five months of trying. I may need a Justice to learn physics in order to
have my case adjudicated as making my own case has not only given me elegant legal
theory but also helped me define a new force, the intrinsic force, which unites gravity and
electromagnetism and so caused me to have a unified theory of everything and which has
now given me the answer to a great scientific mystery as I know why and how the
magnetic North Pole moves.

No other person on the planet has this knowledge of the magnetic North Pole; no other
person came to discover the unifying force as Americans no longer know the feeling of
liberty and so do not know that liberty is realized as law and will is realized as
government. People then are realized as both, a living government and living law. We are
also realized as a living force, both seen and unseen. Our power is visible and invisible.
Other Earthlings have never experienced the outside condition of liberty - the vote - and
so have never felt it or if they have the vote have no way to uphold it or enforce the law
as no other nation has what we have as our American law is elegant legal code.
Constitutional democracies that closely mimic ours were not won by war or if they were,
have not been willing to suffer and sacrifice as we have for citizens not our own. No
other nation gave all of its power to the people but also then derived all of its power from
the people, people who volunteer - people who have will and liberty. They choose. Our
closest sibling? Great Britain, as they gave themselves the power of dissolution when
Queen Elizabeth II voluntarily paid income tax but they still do not have a written
constitution as we do. It is not accident that we share an honor bond, one that is over 400
years old, was restated during WWII and became real when the first American died in
defense of the life of Great Britain and has never been revoked since, not even when the
evidence for war was proven to be no good. Recently it was restated once again during
the anniversary celebration of Jamestown by the Queen herself.

There is no other nation on Earth in which a citizen may will him or her own self to
power based upon a single vote and have this upheld by a willing people who consent or
by exercising their rights of dissolution and hope. No other nation has a legitimate human
rights court or Supreme Court and a just and moral military force willing to enforce the
law and who must, by law, disobey the illegal or immoral order of a commanding officer
as this military force is the people and is commanded by a civilian. This court and this
military – the people - uphold, enforce and defend our law. American citizens are realized
as government, realized as law and realized as an actual, physical, ethical force or actual
physical power. Our law then is the written embodiment of the creation force; it is an
actual physical form of energy which I have named the intrinsic force. This force has a
scientifically confirmed weight and properties of both electricity and magnetism. It binds
the universe. This creation force is not random and has a pattern, an intelligence and is
merciful and beneficent. It is just. God is constitutional. My Theory of Intrinsicity is
symbolically expressed as:

E=(G+L)(W+Lb)2 or:

Energy equals government and law times the will and liberty of humanity, or of men and
women as ethical creators. Government and law is the mass and humanity is the constant.
The squared? Out unique law is a duality; it is both physical and spiritual or emotional. It
is written and unwritten; it has an ethic born of humans and of God; it names a creator
apart from ourselves with that exact word, “creator”, and then restates this with the exact
words “We, the people.” We create other actual people with thoughts, feelings, ideas and
beliefs and we create things. We are law and we are government both constitutions and
institutions aka energy and matter. Our law is the written embodiment of energy and
matter being united in humanity. It is the written expression of God in humanity and of
life in the universe; it makes us co-conspirators with the universe. It is written law that
represents the ideas contained in Genesis that we are all a reflection of one creator and
each other, and that one creation force rules over this universe.

Our law makes religion the code of conduct for our nuclear family but makes our
Declaration and Constitution the rules of engagement or absolute law for our national
family, and then the planet and then the universe.
This discovery is as monumental as Einstein's in our understanding of this universe and
our relationship to it. It is intrinsicity as we are a nation that named as a power our
intellectual property. In my case it was a tangible legal code based upon a once intangible
idea that gave rise to an understanding of the intangible God or creation force.
Intellectual property is specifically Article I Section 8 as it was deemed to be so
important to our founders that ownership or patent of scientific discovery is exactly
named. So then:

Currently, the citizens still do not know why they should vote or even how to invoke
moral authority. They say the words but do not know what they mean. They cannot
perform a duty they do not understand. They do not know how to tell a lie from the truth.
All Americans will only continue to be denied justice until or unless the citizens decide to
do their duty and vote, and vote without blinders on their eyes, their ears and their hearts.
A current and popular legal theory negates the Declaration as not as important as our
Constitution and this is false. A new political party, the Unity Party, is collecting honor
bound dollars and has as an official plank the foreignization of the office of the president
which is the overthrow of this office and no one has so much as blinked. This party's
faulty reasoning is nothing other than the question why not? I can answer that question.
This office is also being openly bought and sold as the price of one billion dollars was
named and then acted upon by the candidates who now vie for the office. The presidency
is not for sale but it is up for the vote. None of these persons has mentioned equal
protection or has any idea how to secure the rights of women and their children. Those
honor bound dollars? They do not know they are constitutional and also do not know our
free public library system is constitutional on worldwide basis as it is a living honor bond
that spans the globe and in real time due to the internet. Not one person knows that a new
contract with America was never necessary as we already have five signed federal
contracts: the Declaration, the Constitution, our money, the draft registry and one other
that is unwritten or inherent until after the fact: birth, which makes all citizens property of
the federal government and peers so that their legal and physical custody is theirs alone
and, within reason and the law, they choose whom to award this to via free association
and the vote.

I am beginning to think that I am the only modern American to ever discover that our
founders did indeed bury a national treasure for us to find in the event we lost our way
and so lost the good idea of our nation and ourselves. There exists a real, actual treasure
to be found. It is not merely an exciting storyline for a movie; it is actual reality. They left
clues every where, most in plain sight and in plain feeling, and in so doing marked a trail
for us to follow in order to find our way home. I am beginning to think that after having
traversed the planet, when our founders made their great leap of faith in 1776 and again
in 1787 and in so doing traversed the human heart, they landed in my spirit alone of all
human beings around the world alive today who call themselves citizens of a
Constitutional nation and who are proof that the founders were once actual living people,
men and women who gave birth to a government and to a law that beats and breathes and
is alive and connects us to this universe.
I have a clue that other Americans once knew a part of this as it is Daniel Webster who
once stated: “We may be tossed upon an ocean where we can see no land - nor, perhaps
the sun and stars. But there is a chart and a compass for us to study, to consult and to
obey. The chart is the Constitution.” The compass is a liberated human heart; a liberated
spirit. A human being's internal compass must be set due North or to equivalent liberty
and will, to justice, also known as legal power and moral authority, and then this internal,
physical emotion and physical sensation is felt. To possess or set this compass, one must
invoke moral authority alone over and over in spite of anything placed upon them, in
spite of all outside conditions they may be subject to as this is the only choice we own as
ours alone. This is liberty even when liberty is denied you. This is how an American wills
himself or herself to power.

It is a fact of my life: I was predestined to suffer this absolute injustice and the only
choices in my life that I ever truly made were the moral and ethical choices. All others
were made by God. Long ago God decided that I would be made to will myself to power;
that I would lose everything so that my will would run headlong into my liberty, my
single vote. Fireworks and a burning then ensued. That is because in America nothing is
as it seems but is as it feels, as we alone named emotions as rights and legally defined our
humanity as both spiritual and physical. In America, appearances are always deceiving;
here, you set off the explosion first and then the fuse is lit and that is God's sense of
humor. Humans are the cause and the effect; the effect is then itself a cause; it is
humanity itself and is within humanity; issue and jurisdiction is one and the same or is a
constitutional authority case. That is what the founders felt and described and defined
with our written law: what it is to be human and to experience our humanity born of a
hope bigger and beyond our one person.

God decided the issue for me and for all of us, that we would be human beings who are
women and men, and then God decided the jurisdiction, America. God decided that We,
the people would be a perfect storm and that we would be made to fight, to defend our
human dignity and keep ourselves and each other safe, and for me alone this began from
the day before kindergarten until I finally made land here before our Supreme Court. As
this is America and not Great Britain it is not Queensbury but Marbury who rules. Long
before I ever knew this as fact without question I believed it and acted upon it as I was
born with some of this knowledge and it never once occurred to me that the law did not
apply to me or that I would not be allowed to live it. I did not know others saw me and
believed me to be only a woman and not a whole person. I did not know discrimination
was real. I did not conceive of myself as a victim as in America it seems as if it isn’t
possible. My true belief was woman was not a class as it is humanity and as it is illogical
to harm the very people who ensure you, your own self, continue as a species and as a
nation. My own parents denied reality. My teachers denied reality. I did not own the
knowledge that “woman” or “Native” was believed to be defective.

My definition of my person was not and is not only female as that is a quality chosen for
me by God and not in my control. “Native” is partly out of my control as like any belief
system I can choose it or not as my fact. That is what “renouncing” your citizenship is;
you are rejecting the belief system known as American law. It is not supposed to be done
so lightly. Failing to act can be renouncing your citizenship as our law is you must be
deliberate. Running around saying you are American does not make you American.

As my compass is true my reality is I am not afraid to stand before the Supreme Court
and argue on my own behalf and I am not afraid to tell the exact truth of our law no
matter how unpopular it might be. Liberty is a choice from among some but not any and
all and not exactly the same; it is not equal rights but equivalent rights as no two people
are the same; men and women are distinct and then become unique. Proof of life tells me
a fair hearing is not to be had in the other courts for whatever reasoning they may cite as I
may be one of the only living Americans who knows exactly what liberty is and feels like
and also knows exactly what liberty denied is and feels like.

My fact is that other Americans are operating with a skewed emotional compass as liberty
is the common emotion and common physical sensation our forbearers shared and
founded this nation upon. It seems it has been beaten out of people by use of word games,
the invocation of negative emotions and negative ideas and by outright lies and also by
the denial of equal protection and due process, the effect of which is perceived reality
being accepted as fact without question; it is accepted as actual reality and so the people
have gone to sleep at the wheel as this ship veers wildly off course.

This is why I do not fear or do not look back in anger or regret, or even with remorse or
want for what might have been. I lost all or willingly gave it up as did the first patriots in
order to gain something more which is beyond value: myself and the future, a future in
which will and liberty are fully owned by all people, especially my own children. To look
back will only serve to deny me what can be and will be. This is but a link in a chain as
our law, in the form of a chain of command government, is also a chain of energy which
extends into this universe from our creator and so will eventually give rise to a
constitutional planet, one I will not live to witness in the form of energy known as this
exact and absolute person named Susan.

It did not occur to me for a single second until it happened to me that I could not appear
before the Supreme Court because I was a mother and standing alone, or that the New
York 3rd District Appellate would and could write a decision containing an actual
Constitutional violation with exact words, that the highest state court would then uphold
it as fact without question, that the things I am charged with do not have to be named
anywhere in any decision, that asking the state for protection and then being granted it
before my children were physically injured as I was amounted to me voluntarily giving
up my parental rights permanently as now NY and PA allow only those children left in a
violent situation until injury occurs to be be reunited with their mothers so that asking for
help to avoid injury becomes a crime, that we would be judged to be worth less than zero
as zero services were offered to us for our reunification in spite of precedent and more
physical injury would be demanded of us with taxes cited as reason when a penny now
costs more to mint than it is actually worth and finally, that an exact lie would be written
and then upheld by NY as fact: that a PA contract stemming from Philadelphia County
was not fulfilled by me.
In my unique case there exists six, not five, valid PA contracts all out of Philadelphia
County of which I did fulfill the stipulations of no matter what the family court, Appellate
Courts and other federal courts state: 1 ). a private, paid for county and state endorsed
custody contract which is unconstitutional but which I chose to fulfill while all others
defaulted; 2 ). our money as the mint is located there and I refused to pay unjust taxes
thus upholding the law and the honor bond; 3 ). a birth certificate as I yet fight for my
children and my break for liberation or justice was made in this city so one might say I
was born again where our nation was born; 4 ). the draft registry as I gave birth and so
shed my blood in defense of the constitution and was made to survive a violent, bloody
domestic war waged against women and their children for no valid reasoning for which I
suffered permanent injury but yet did not receive a Purple Heart except for the one you
cannot see and; 5 ) and 6 ). the Declaration and the Constitution which are supported
only by my single, uncast vote and by my willingness to act.

As this is the case and I did not fail to fulfill these contracts, I have a right to press suit as
the injured party against all other citizens, all 300 million, and I have a right to hold any
and all persons I am of the true belief are accountable and responsible, including a past
president, a current president, an attorney general and a Chief Justice and even hold some
or all of them liable if I can meet the burden of proof standard and the shocking to the
senses standard as well as invoke past precedent and/or perhaps establish new precedent
based upon my own unique legal argument.

My proof that I did fulfill all of these stipulations even the ones of the private contract
that is denied by the State of PA and the State of New York and so have standing to press
suit? This very petition as the point I stopped defending myself in a corrupted county
court guilty of graft was the point in 2002 when I acted upon an earlier 2000 decision and
took a legal research class as I had to return to school or work as stipulated and refused to
fund my own subjugation and injury via taxation without representation and instead
began researching this petition and this legal argument. I used federal tax dollars, a
federal grant, to learn how to find cases that would support my claim. I can cite thousands
of federal and state rulings. I worked only to satisfy appearances so they could not change
the condition once again and state school was not good enough or proof enough for the
court and even told the evaluator I was quitting as soon as I possibly could and she
laughed as she told me I was one of the most honest persons she had ever encountered in
a custody battle. She found for me twice. I could not predict that the effects of Bush V
Gore would be what they are; I invoked moral authority and acted intending only to
preserve, protect and defend my own person in a later, just courtroom.

I killed two birds with one vote by fulfilling a stipulation of an unconstitutional contract
and also helping myself at the same time as all the family court was concerned with was
the appearance of my fulfillment and not the substance of what it means to be a mother, a
creator in the truest sense and then, in the end, the PA court violated the law as I knew it
would by allowing the third parties to default and by denying actual reality thus sending
it to a state that had already denied me, the birth mother, standing. A social worker had
told me of the unwritten policies.
By acting to fulfill that contract in a completely constitutional manner by acquiring the
tool I needed to preserve, protect and defend myself and my children I secured my right
to appear in the Supreme Court by arguing the exact pre-existing, unwritten policy of PA
in order to prove it existed. I placed it upon the record. In PA on my own I said only "I
want you to consider domestic violence runs in both families." The policy? To deny
domestic violence in reasoning their family court decisions and to give children to any
family member present if in foster care no matter the reason even violence. I not only
meant on all levels but that women were now engaging in it as victims who then become
victimizers. I know exactly and specifically why we are now seeing a rise in drug abuse,
preteen sexual activity, child abuse, sexual abuse, battery, robbery and murder etc. and
that women are now committing it and so are children. I was like a founder, I was crafty
and used their own nasty trick against them only I told the truth and did not deliberately
abuse anyone let alone children. I used silence and did not say, "I want you to consider
you, the judge, are violating Article 4 Section 4 as you know damn well you cannot send
this case to a state that already refused me standing and you will not write a word about
the broken contract and the violation of the order of this court the third parties are guilty
of and you are using words and emotions to make it seem as if what you are doing is all
legal and above board and only because I am a woman. I know what game you are
playing.”

Arguing my own case then I meant to state my suspicion that domestic violence was
endemic and it was now occurring from an immediate or nuclear level to local municipal,
city, county, state and federal level. Today I know this as fact. Then, I had no idea this
problem was as serious as it is. This emotional assault and battery is perpetrated upon us
as we enter this world and does not cease. For some of us it is the reasoning we leave this
world and the reasoning that we never become what we were born to be as the federal
government is now participating in it and not only refuses to create, enforce, and uphold
the law on behalf of women and children but exploits this type of emotional violence for
its own gain - to maintain the corrupted status quo. In my life, I have not been accorded a
single, lone opportunity; I was given not one chance and neither were my children.
Nothing else explains how a person this gifted is yet violated and has yet to spend one
single second of her life on her own pursuits and safe from harm. My children? I am their
one chance and their only hope of any opportunity and the corrupted courts almost
destroyed that chance.

My very first legal argument in Albany, NY? Unjust taxation as no judge ever had any
moral authority to call me before the courts or the legal power to use tax dollars this way.
In my case, judges flagrantly broke the law as I was a Navy dependent and Clinton's
perjury was equivalent to deserting his post or abandoning his command and no authority
acted. Perjury is a crime, as is abusing power to then harm women and so is failing to act
so that children and others more vulnerable are injured. A President’s command doesn’t
end until he or she dies and they are yet to be accountable and responsible for their
actions while in office even if not liable. Abandoning your command is one of the most
serious crimes under our law. Mothers go to jail for abandoning their command - their
children. He was treated as if he was not our peer; he was excepted from the law. This
demoralized the military and caused me direct injury. This interruption in chain of
command was not resolved in 2000 and combined with PA holding a hearing for which I
was not served and could not humanly be present for as I was in the hospital due to my
injuries and as it was done on the 28th day not the promised and standard 30, no court
decisions were ever valid or legal. They are meaningless, worthless pieces of paper. PA
entered a contract with me never intending to follow through upon it, which is one reason
why it held that hearing when it did. The only two people on the planet qualified to judge
me as a mother or a parent are named Ethan and Christopher. When Clinton defaulted
with Don’t Ask then when he broke the law he gave his authority and power away. Not
one person acted to uphold and enforce the law except for me.

While I could not have predicted Bush V Gore would then harm me, it is intrinsicity as
Morrison was heard that same year. I was of the mistaken belief Congress had revoked
the legislation. When I read it had used the interstate commerce clause I fell over. I know
why, segregation was attacked this way, but did I just read Congress admit to the actual
problem? That women and children are now humanly trafficked across state lines, sold,
due to attaching support to children but then hearing custody cases and due to
unconstitutional policy and acts, and because they must travel to other states in order to
escape violence as no authority enforces law, and that they are often denied their vote as
the states rarely enforce keeping their names off the public voting rolls?

On February 27, 2007, I knew my standing was pure and absolute as my mother's maiden
name is Brown and my town, founded in a tax revolt, the very same founding issue as the
nation, violated our vote, our right of self determination and our safety by allowing a
company to build here, a company that violates the law of this nation at its whim and will
and is currently in federal court for violating the rights of women. We are a military town
and as this company then does business in China and has allowed the communist party to
open branches in its stores it is forcing our service members to support communism as it
shuts out businesses obeying the law. Further, the local police refuse to enforce the law
and blame the victim; they harm women. This police department was investigated by the
FBI and an officer was found guilty of destroying citations for sex. I was injured by this
police department and have the records to prove it as well as a witness. Citizens wrote to
the paper and otherwise protested; we were ignored. This is exactly what our federal
government does to us. The discrimination of women is now endemic or absolute.

The discrimination of women has become about our very humanity.

The courts attempted to reason my person away then my humanity away. They tried to
then force or make my person die, to make me believe I was guilty and deserved what
had happened to me, to shame me and blame me, by then taking my children and using
every word in the book to say I was a defective mother and a bad mother who abandoned
her children as she was on drugs, crazy or did not love them. All lies. By citing mother
they meant to lay claim to my moral authority – my human rights. Judges made up
allegations - wrote actual exact lies - assigned emotions to me that are not fact and even
stated my testimony was suspect although not one person entered a single piece of
evidence against me and they saw my scars in open court. This is creation without any
ethic whatsoever and when you remove the metaphysic as this nation has begun to do it is
then not possible to have an ethic. Ethics do not exist without a metaphysic: a true belief
or faith born of a creator, of a hope bigger than your own self.

In 1996, a team of lawyers asked me to represent a class action suit headed for the
Supreme Court concerning military housing; as anxious as I was to appear, I refused as I
would not harm my children further. My mother once had to make this same choice as
she had a case that would go to our highest court. She chose herself and us as she would
not receive justice only money as she was of the belief while it would be settled men
would not obey the law and it would eat up her life. She was correct: preserve your own
constitution firstly. Rotsker V Goldberg is proof as its reasoning is a violation of
separation of power. She cannot make men acknowledge actual reality if they are not
willing: women vote. We possess constitutional authority of our own selves as we are
now born into it. Our humanity is not a matter of debate. Actual delivery of the paper
commission was not necessary but has occurred. You can even go to the Smithsonian and
see the law for yourself as it hasn’t crumbled or faded away – yet. It is excuse to claim
you are waiting for a decision from the Supreme Court and do not have to obey the law
on behalf of women unless you see that piece of paper; it is not a valid defense to claim
you did not know, either in my own case or in the case of Bush V Gore. She could not
have known what would happen to my children and me or she would have gone to federal
court. I have often thought about that choice and my own. I challenged these lawyers to
tell me what was so special about me. They lied. I thought, unethical. I turned them
down. I knew exactly what was so special about me.

I knew it was the idea of Christopher, a named legal unborn person who was
acknowledged by the state, and whose mother would defy every single authority and
power in his or her way in order to see to it that he was born and born alive. I made him I
promise when I created him and then when I had to ask the state for protection and it is a
promise I have never broken. Those dishonest lawyers lost that case and I know how and
why and have never regretted my decision one time even when the pursuit of justice
seemed as if it might be hopeless. The entire time those lawyers, the military and the
states were fighting and blaming each other and then me they did not know my children
or myself for what we are: the living people, the living constitutions with power of our
own who will prove the case for humanity and for our law.

My children can and will give testimony in the only court they trust, our Supreme Court.
As early as 2002 my sons made a reasoned decision to not speak to the judge as they told
me she was not a “good person” and that the third parties told them that she was out to
“harm” me and wanted to do so. When warned that we might lose if they did not speak to
her but that they had other options they then told me that they knew I would go “all the
way” to the “Supreme Court” for them if I must - their own exact words as I never once
mentioned this court in direct connection to our case in front of them so it was then and is
now their own reasoning. They were 5 and 7 at the time. I had taught them the law as
faith, as a parent should. Would they have reasoned this if they knew their right to access
the federal court would be denied them? Did I have any true, actual choice or recourse as
I would not expose them to this corrupted and possibly criminal judge? The federal
question no authority will acknowledge is this one:
What in the world did Ethan and Christopher ever do that made the denial of their rights,
even life, legal? If it was being born to me then it is beyond their control, and if the
federal court must deny I exist in order to deny that Ethan and Christopher have rights
then my children have their very own case to make, if not now then someday. Hope,
integrity, love, compassion and the responsibility of being a mother was my own
reasoning for denying myself the opportunity to enter the Supreme Court then; it is now
my reasoning for my attempts at entering today as a case of original jurisdiction and/or
upon an extraordinary writ.

Susan, Ethan and Christopher can and will make the case for equal protection and due
process or equivalent rights and they include such issues as women in combat, abortion,
custody, sperm and egg donation, surrogacy, Native American land use, same sex
marriage, separation of church and state, term limits, stem cell research, PACS, foster
care, credit card contracts, pornography, a two party political monopoly, a female in
Command and the endemic discrimination of women now realized as a gross violation of
separation of power in all branches of government. I have lived them or they have run
through my life directly. I have named and reasoned them, at last count over 25. I can
reason others such as gun control and is death for the sexual abuse of a child awardable
or is death only awardable for murder? Some are human rights, some are Constitutionally
protected rights, some are privileges, some are not protected at all as they do not even
exist in our law and some are the responsibility of the citizens alone as the federal
government should not spoon feed an unwilling people who have the ability to act on
their own behalf and refuse to do so. At times our answers have been correct but our
reasoning is faulty and/or not our law. These issues forced me to shed some mistaken
beliefs I had of this world and while surprising I know it is not beyond us as a nation to
live out our law as elegant legal theory.

We possess the ability to become elegant human beings. We may not get all that we want
but we will get all that we need: The blessings of liberty.

The universe is lawful as is America; it came into existence as lawful and it did not occur
to the federal court or any court I have been in before today - not even a Philadelphia
County Court - that I had will and liberty of my own and now that I have discovered the
actual national treasure left for us I completely own this other fact of me:

They were and are fighting a detail of God and as this is Earth they were bound to lose
from a time before they began. In short, the die is cast; the unjust men and now some
unjust women who are the government must submit to the living Declaration and living
Constitution or triumph over the universe.

This government may cite woman as reason to deny me rights but I cite my humanity as
reasoning to claim those rights, inalienable and inviolate, and as every single cell of my
body is infused with my father's sperm and my mother's egg it is then sacred geometry so
that I am both a physical being and a spiritual being and neither can be made separate or
apart from my person. My humanity is not dependent upon any outside condition placed
upon me by the state as I was born into liberty and the vote and I will have it as I am a
power of one.

For remedy and relief I ask for proof I do not need but apparently the other citizens do: A
piece of paper confirming that I became the actual, legal President and Commander on
June 5th, 2007 at 12:12:31 PM as that is when I acted upon my knowledge regarding the
office of President and the office of Commander in Chief as that is when I owned the
legal argument regarding the latter. I possess a dated federal receipt. For other remedy
and relief see Appendix O and for an actual order to stand aside or down see Appendix P.

Reasons for Granting the Petition

I assume it would be obvious as to how this will aid the court in the exercise of its
appellate jurisdiction as would the reason to hear it: so you are able to apply the law in a
just manner to all Americans most especially women and children.

Then so that it is proved to the rest of the world as they do not understand: our law is it; it
is the one. Of all legal codes ever written ours is elegance and perfection as it is
universal. This will give Americans proof their life is worth living no matter the outside
conditions they are subjected to be they good, bad, evil, just, unjust, ugly, lonely, rich,
poor or seemingly devoid of any means of escape. It will give them hope as if I could do
this they can too; this is possible no matter the outcome. No sinking ship is beyond repair
and our law provides for this at cost: a single vote.

My children and I need, want and deserve justice and a hearing is the actual award not the
piece of paper as in America it truly is all in the attempt. The attempt becomes the
recovery.

I can and will prove you do not win the office of the President but that you guard it. I can
and will prove that no person needs a billion dollars to preserve, protect and defend the
constitution as you start with your very own - your person. I can and will teach
Americans that their vote is the power of one; it is their liberty and also their right of life
and hope and why and how it is a duty, a privilege and a right. I can and will teach
Americans that our law does not provide for willing victimization and/or complaining but
instead gives one the right to make their case.

I can and will prove that God, the creation force, is a real thing using scientific and
historical

fact. I can prove God by using disciplines or fields of study - chemistry, geometry,
history,
language, religion, physics, color, geography, mythology, law etc. - we all know
something about. It is not a jumble of indecipherable numerical equations. I can and will
prove how and why the magnetic North Pole is moving at over 40 km per decade towards
Siberia.
I can and will prove Native Americans could and sometimes still do exert influence over
natural forces but do not control them exactly equal to the power of God. I can and will
prove how the ancient Egyptians and others moved massive blocks of stone without
modern tools and without ropes, pulleys and wheels. My ancestors worked in the granite
quarries of New England. My sister is a geologist. I collected rocks from 47 states, all of
which I have been to by car and on foot, and from across Canada. I know something
about stone. And people. This is proof of life, mostly this American life as without our
Declaration and Constitution and without Native America I would not be of the ability to
do this.

I can and will prove that all five major world religions and all indigenous belief systems I
have come across so far are named in our law. Exact beliefs or concepts are in our law
although they are not named exactly. I can and will prove what Justice Kennedy once
said: Muslims are not a bunch of “nuts and wackos”; that Islam teaches some ideal
concepts of law, government and justice when lived out according to what Mohammed
actually taught. I can and will prove Islam is responsible for some of our greatest
scientific, legal and architectural achievements. Mohammed was a constitutionalist. I can
and will prove all five religions as compatible or true, correct and factual. I can and will
prove the words of their founders or their founding principles are all fact and that in each
religion and in Native America there is an actual sacred experience of God to be had. I
can and will prove that although natural law and written law is unified in our governing
documents that it does not mean we should then make American law a religion or come
to believe it as and practice it as a religion. It also in no way makes us equal to God;
humans will never possess the actual, exact power of God nor come to define God
exactly.

I can and will prove that physical evolution is not real; Darwin made a mistake. He had
some of it factually correct but not exactly correct. The creationists are close but they too
have missed something. I can and will prove the string theorists are incorrect. Although
this may threaten men who have received Nobel Prizes and written book after book
expounding upon atheism, string theory, evolution, Darwin and Miller, if not for those
men I would have no points of reference and the Nobel Prize is awarded for the
achievement not the result alone as we all use the results of that chase in order to then
come to our own discoveries and that is why it is not awarded posthumously. It is about
the achievement of still living people who struggle to answer the questions we have about
people, this planet and our universe. In this way a Nobel Prize is constitutional and no
person need to fear being “wrong” as the pursuit of knowledge or happiness is not ever
“right” or “wrong”.

I can and will prove that human beings are above other animals, that there exists a real,
definable, tangible difference and will do so using my proof and an exhibit which exists
only at the National Zoo in Washington, DC and no where else in the world. The Justices
need to make the short trip there and see it for themselves. They can then reason my
evidence and supporting evidence and decide whether or not human beings are the energy
of God neither created nor destroyed but merely changed from one form into another.
Americans need to know our founders would love what our money has become; it is an
institution of government on the verge of becoming a constitution as it is a living honor
bond just as our law is a living honor bond. It is entirely appropriate that the Supreme
Court hear a case revolving around people as money, or an exact dollar amount no matter
what form of energy and matter it takes: a house, a heart, a child, a court award, a poor
person's petition, a tax bill, a job, a vote, a private custody contract, a law, a discovery, an
election, what an attorney charges per hour, black and white copies, postage or a
mistaken belief about the idea of female.

Lastly, you should hear my case in support of all of the founders who have come before
us including late Chief Justice Rhenquist and his decision to keep his head above water
and in support of your own selves and your own decisions in Bush V Gore as you marked
the trail for me. All I had to do was follow the beating hearts. This became possible in
July of 2006 as my sons gave me evidence I did not have before and so I was then able to
go back and open the December 2005 NY Appeals denial for the first time, then pick
apart the October 2005 District Appellate decision and then all of history to our big bang:

Sailing from England to Jamestown, Virginia aboard three ships named the Godspeed, the
Discovery and the Susan Constant.

Of course that bang in no way supercedes our other big bang, the biggest bang of all in
human history after Adam and Eve: the debating, writing and signing of our Declaration
followed by the Constitution after having lived it, our American Revolution and life on
Earth.

Susan Herbert

Other reasoning to hear this petition:

Americans have not only lost their way they have no national identity. This may repeat
many things I have already stated but it is my most important reasoning and says it best.

Americans do not see themselves as Americans and most have never felt as if they are
American. My evidence? This is proof you will know as fact without meeting me: Any
American who places any label other than person or American upon themselves first is
then stating they are less than human as those words - American, person and human - are
equivalent. Americans still cling to this idea we are African American, Irish American,
gay American or Italian American. We still believe ourselves and others to be only black,
only women or only Mexican. We believe it so deeply we act upon it. No matter what
citizens state is their true belief it is their actions that belie their words. While all those
things shaped who we are and shaped what we believe as truth and real, we are not those
things. If you cut a person open you do not see any of those things except for woman.
You see male or female and that is because we are both as every cell is the product of an
egg and sperm and so we are human. We are distinct powers and birth, the ability to give
it, levels the playing field for women as it itself is an actual power equivalent to physical
strength. Those distinct powers come from the union of an egg, a sperm and intrinsic
force. All people then are born whole yet distinct and then become absolute or unique.

Women cannot feel what they have never experienced as this is impossible. One cannot
then teach what one has never known, is not allowed to experience or was never taught.
My parents taught me the law as faith. I had to figure out America's lack of faith. It has
one cause and its effects are many but partly it's 1, a language problem as we have lost
our language and 2, it isn't one reason its reasoning! It is objective, critical thinking based
upon provable, documented fact including your own fact - your own experience of life
and your own emotions which may never be a provable fact of any other person. You
cannot fact check another person's heart! In America you check and balance your own
self first. If you're one of the results of the founders experiment then you must fine tune
you, who has now become the experiment itself. You do not stop fine tuning you until
justice is perfected.

I am a person who had to decide the clock began ticking for me, my humanity was born,
in 1776 and again in 1787. I had to decide we became an actual power and an actual
nation when Cornwallis surrendered to Washington and then when he raised his hand or
otherwise voted to ratify our Constitution as he was there before, during and after and so
he was our parent and both a mother and a father to us. I owe my actual life to
Washington, my actual body and my actual spirit. In any other nation I would be dead. I
would not have survived. Before 1787 there was no federal property, no definitive
citizenship and no federal governmental body of any kind but only an idea. I had to meet
the founders the only way I could - through their words and actions with other people and
in perspective of this universe not the nation or the planet as I soon realized that our
Revolution was one of the short quick bursts of evolution we experience. I had to reset
that clock to the very beginning of time once I knew our law to be elegant and a form of
energy as it is the unifying force. Once I did that I could see that our founders were like
gases swirling and coalescing and forming particles, rocks, meteors and then planets.
There really was an invisible big bang here on Earth, a document was written that was all
the energy of every human being who had come before then turned into another form -
our law. We were created; then we were born.

Universes are born as all things are born; everything has parents. Even rocks have parents
as they are born of other dead planets that become the gases that form a new solar system.
Parents are here before, during and after our creation. Even if one does not know their
parents they know other humans and they have an idea of God, the creation force. The
Declaration and Constitution are the legal or spiritual parents of all Americans and as
many Americans do not live here and will never be citizens as it is an idea first, America
is a universe as it has no center and no edge; it is always growing, expanding and dying
as we lose or give up those mistaken beliefs such as women are less than men and we are
always making new or other decisions.

I was of the ability to use those two documents to move through solid walls and enter
buildings without keys and without using any actual door or window. I saw the unseen as
I knew what was not written but was inherent and I knew the truth from a lie. I read
documents I have never laid eyes on and heard conversations I was not privy to and that
occurred in secret. I met people, old persons who have been dead for more than a hundred
years as children, babies even, as I came to know Hamilton as an infant in the Caribbean,
saw Washington almost end his career before it had begun by finding himself in a
situation in which he named a fort “Necessity” out of actual necessity, witnessed Deborah
Sampson disguise herself as a man in order to fight and answered James Madison’s
question: What exists at the founding of any great government? long after he first asked it
himself. I was in the room when they opened the Constitutional Convention under a gag
order. I rode with Washington when he saw Valley Forge green once in his life and like
Patrick Henry, I smelled a rat. I laughed with Lincoln when he was told Grant was
drinking and he replied, “Find out what and give it to the other generals.” I told Lincoln,
“I'll have some of what Washington DC has been smoking as drunk generals are a lot
more coordinated and cooperative than Congress.”

When the news reported they had found a scrap of paper, garbage from the Constitutional
Convention now worth millions, I had to know why some of us were not even worth an
appearance in the trash. I had to know why we are still considered garbage. So now I
know: we are all in or on those documents someway, somehow as it is the words you do
not see that carry the greatest weight as these people were ordinary human beings like me
who rose to meet a challenge God threw down before them like a gauntlet or a dare and
did so in an extreme place in an extreme time and so it should have been impossible but it
wasn't. They did not write some of those words as in “Native”, “slave” or “woman” but
they did act. They left it up to us to write those words across our own hearts first and then
upon a piece of paper.

To know your Americaness you have to learn about the world historical record and then
about the lives of these people. We are millions of pieces, absolutes, that make one whole
nation and one whole portion of history known as American history. It's important to
know John Adams represented the British soldiers accused of the killings we call the
Boston Massacre. It's important to know Benjamin Banneker used his knowledge of the
sky to plot the capital. It's important to know Jefferson owned a copy of the Koran and
was furious the British burned our Library of Congress and that Abigail Adams
blossomed in France but still chose to leave or that Mary Pickersgill made a fortune for
herself sewing early American flags. You must ask yourself how Robert Smalls could
decide to steal a ferry or blow himself and his family up trying and why the Sundance
was so sacred almost no records of it exist. You need to wonder how we ended up losing
so many of our founders overseas and why many of them died in poverty. You need to
know why you do not hear Martin Luther King the way others do and why Thomas Paine
participated in the failed French revolution. It changes things if you know the first
European born here whose birth was recorded was named Virginia Dare as your heart
will ping: God really did dare our virgin souls, the blank slates called "American ".

It's important, all of it, and to live in a big country you need a big heart. When you know
the world and all of your facts you can reason your life and those facts guide you in the
right direction. You will feel and hear other hearts before they are born or after they are
dead. Then you, your own self, are an American founder: you are a President,
Commander and Chief Justice. You are a mother and a warrior.

Our founders managed to author two documents that invoke the universal truths of this
world. Those documents are not based upon Christianity and Americans become less than
when they tell this lie as those documents include every person on this planet and the
universal truth of every major world religion or philosophy. What our founders did was
bring every human experience they ever had to the table plus a unique experience - the
Iroquois Confederacy. They understood that they were standing alone with a new idea
and a very special opportunity before them: destiny meeting fate as this continent was
settled last and so they had the entire historical record including the missing link, Native
America and the idea of participatory democracy. Our founders added aspiration, the idea
of God, to political conspiracy and so gave birth to universal law whether they knew it or
not. Because of this, conspiring politically with each other to then conspire politically
with each other and God, we thus conspire with the universe and so Americans pray when
they vote, pray when they litigate or pray when they spend money. An American’s life is a
prayer.

The record reflects they did know what they were doing. They used the word
“providence” and not “fate”. As I reasoned the founders and then my own life I knew I
could prove God and prove predestination; not fatalism but destiny we are born into as
uniquely our own. There is reasoning Adams and Jefferson were not at the Convention
and it has little to do with ability but everything to do with choice and is very, very
important today. There is reasoning Jefferson hated transubstantiation so much he insisted
people swear they did not believe in this before holding office. Could they know being
absent from the Convention or expressing hate would lead me to own an answer I would
need to make this case? Could they know it would lead me to solve a seemingly
unsolvable problem? Could they choose to do these exact things by reasoning, “We
should travel to France and not participate in a convention we know nothing about yet
because in 220 years Susan will be reasoning her case.” or “I'm going to make you swear
on a bible that you do not believe in this because Susan will need this as supporting
evidence in about 200 years.” No, and that is God. There is reasoning in all life and for all
life. Thinking about my own self in this way and as them making those decisions led me
to know a mystery of this universe and answer one of the biggest questions in all of
human history both legal and scientific and the entire time I had no idea others were
working on answering the very same questions. I had no idea a physicist at Harvard was
close but as she did not know Constitutional law missed uniformity and predestination. It
dawned on me: all of our founders were ordinary people.

Most of them were not born geniuses but merely curious. Others were born into poverty
and broken families. Some had disabilities, some had no education and all were born into
harm. Like me, born into harm. They took advantage of opportunity when it came their
way. They were of the ability to conquer fear when it was most important. They did not
think of themselves as heroes. We will never know the names of most as thousands,
millions, never set foot inside Independence Hall. They saw a future that was theirs to
create and so duly processed themselves by accepting God's challenge and daring God
right back and so shot their own person like time's arrow into 2007. They became
extraordinary; they fully embraced their humanity and the idea of God in them by
deciding, by making the seemingly insane decision to sit down and write up an actual
paper petition, a manifesto, declaring that their creation was beyond their control and so it
was a given: they were human and while they may have been born into harm were also
born into inalienable rights endowed by that creator. Their humanity was no longer going
to be debated. On a piece of paper they wrote we are of this universe, signed it and then
made it real by willing it, by acting upon it. They did not have a federal courthouse; there
were no police officers. They just acted upon their knowledge and their faith. They made
choices and were accountable and responsible for the results. They were willing to accept
blame or take credit for me, me being one of the results. They adjudicated their own
case; they decided, opined, ruled and finally, voted for themselves.

They were literally and figuratively children of fortune and so then I am too and I became
what I was born to be by doing exactly what they did: I made a single decision and then
willed it. Then I made another decision and willed it. I kept making decisions and willing
them until I could sit down and declare my own self to the world. I went into the federal
court even writing “This is my declaration”. I was stunned when the court denied my
facts, refused to allow me to appear in person and broke the law. They even mocked my
faith in our law! So I made another decision: I would write a petition and enter it to the
Supreme Court. I was stricken when I discovered I had to reason the whole universe in
only 40 pages as it seemed as if it was not possible but I could not fail to act; that was the
only thing I could not do. I decided I would never stop acting.

The innate potential we all possess as Americans is waiting for us to decide to use it.
Chief Justice John Marshall told me in Marbury: a person must claim their commissions
in life. You must decide, then act; you must be deliberate, willful and knowing as it works
both ways. Am I the only one who heard him? Am I the last or the first American?

To look at me one would think I was white and Irish. But I am not. Ireland is not my
home. I am not that history. I am a person who came to know that when Malcolm drew an
“X” after his name he marked a spot upon my own heart and so I too deliberately,
knowingly and willingly went looking for my real parents and my real family. I know that
my physical body came into being in Africa. When I saw a professor looking across the
ocean as seen out the door of the last place a person who was African stood before
boarding a ship for America I did not cry with sadness. It is a fact of me that while
slavery was a tragedy I owe my very life to all of those persons who came here and all of
those persons who never made it. I owe who and what I am to those people who found
the will to live and the will to run; people who made the decision that those documents
applied to their persons and it was worth the risk to act. It is the God knowledge and star
knowledge they brought with them that shaped my own self, the idea that no matter the
outside conditions you too could aspire for more or different. I owe my Americaness to
them and to those same brave decisions and unbelievable choices and know that they
were never alone as when they were suffering they had the idea of me with them. I was
there. I was being created. I was enslaved; I knew to follow those same stars because of
their example. I borrowed their will. That twinge of sadness quickly turned into a deep
and abiding serene assurance that I was loved long before the idea of me was ever
realized. I know that Sojoumer Truth, Marcus Garvey, Frederick Douglass, Rosa Parks,
John Brown or Dred Scott could not have turned to me and extended their hand so that I
myself could stand alone if all of these people had not come before me and lived their
exact and absolute lives.

It is the same with Native Americans. The Trail of Tears they were made to walk I had to
walk. It is the endless, ceaseless journey of history and those tears become a well of souls
if you can somehow own the early hatred and the pain Geronimo felt and acted upon to
understand that you must be like him, and you must not allow anyone to be of the ability
to build a prison from which you cannot escape by liberating your own spirit first. No
piece of paper liberates you. No outside thing liberates you. I came into this court with
the Natives seeking to uphold the broken Ft. Laramie treaty. I am not in the photograph
of these men standing in front of the court building but I was there. I knew not to allow
anyone to place a price or a condition upon my humanity because of their example. A
human must never name or act upon a price. They left refusing to accept a huge cash
settlement as that is not justice and so it still sits untouched collecting interest. They stood
alone on my behalf and entered the Supreme Court with will and liberty and left it that
same way, with their honor intact, as to live in wealth but within that invisible prison is
not what God wants for any of us and neither did the European founders. The idea of will
Natives yet live had to be my own and I had to look upon our shared history and my own
life not as a singular act or even collective acts of hatred but as the universal struggle that
is life: it is the God struggle or the creation struggle, coming to own the idea of God in
you and so we are all equals. We are all human beings of and by God; We are all written
in the stars. It is the endless cycle of birth and death. How do you win this and own this
as faith and as right if you do not engage in the battle? If you are not allowed to engage in
the battle?

When I was standing in that African doorway I felt as if I were a Titan or a Colossus of
Rhodes and that my white skin was representative of those early Europeans but my heart
was American, and that while I would always and forever have one foot planted in Africa
and the other in North America among the Natives, I was all of these things across the
planet as the founders brought the world and then the universe to me and so I was
uniquely American and belonged to no other nation or people. Like our founders I was
able to sever my ties with those other histories and lose those mistaken beliefs of
personhood and family. I know why my first memory is the moon landing and why
America was fated to accomplish this; if I made a mistake and my father was not thinking
of me when this happened it was an accident by design that sent me tumbling head over
heels in the right direction no matter how tragic my life might seem to have been. I would
not change a single, solitary second of it as it all counts.

Claiming my commission so I could enter the Supreme Court forced me to triumph over
the idea of a king, and I am all those men known as Washington, Adams, Jefferson,
Madison and Marshall. I am even Bush Sr. jumping out of a plane into the South Pacific.
I am a founder. I hope therefore I am. Feel how far we swam in only an instant? In only
the blink of an eye?
I jumped from a kitchen in Philadelphia and landed in Florida but made the leap of a
lifetime as my heart went all the way to the ends of the universe and back again on faith
alone. I was born again, for the last and first time as this was by my own will. I was
deliberate! I liberated my own self! I am a Native American warrior who is a woman and
so had no choice: I had to will myself to power. I had to use sheer will alone to survive
those intent on killing the very idea of me as that is the actual threat I am, an inviolate,
true belief which I act upon. To do this I had to go to the source, the same exact source
our own European founders went to, the entire human record beginning with God, then
Adam and Eve. I reasoned myself, I reasoned my heart. Then I attacked the actual
problem. I had more to work with as I had Darwin, Einstein and 220 years of federal
court rulings and American history. I had to go even further and reason all equal
protection issues, all other constitutional law and then define the creation force and
develop a unified theory of everything. I did the impossible. I performed a miracle. Or
did I?

I came into this world knowing how to cry like a man but was made to cry like a woman.
I always knew what I was then forced to learn all over again: If you want proof do
exactly what Thomas Paine said to do, examine all of creation starting with yourself as
you are the proof beyond doubt. I never thought of myself – ever – as less than a man.I
never thought that any man had more than I or was better than I or that God created me
as less than. I was and am the most able and capable person I know. Why be less than
you already are? Why want that? Then do what Paine said was not necessary: read all of
the founding documents we call sacred writings and Scripture. But do so after you
become American, not before as words alone are not proof of anything. Do so after
owning the historical record of this world most especially the historical record of
America. You might then want to fact check yourself and your suspicions by going to the
record we call salvation history. As Paine was first he was American salvation history, he
was it and so he could not possibly know it but he would if he were alive today. All of the
founders would know they were it and so they are with me now as in America the dead
can testify; the dead can appear in court and receive justice. I can bring Thomas Paine,
John Paul Jones and all of the other founders especially women and Natives home at
last.

The truth, the fact of my life is: Other people are the salvation history of me. The
founders, all of them including myself, are the salvation history of me. Our most amazing
feat was fostering and preserving the salvation history of humanity until we came to have
our very own. America’s salvation history is that we save ourselves as we are a nation
that can violate the Constitution absolutely but yet still have a way home as the
Declaration is our spontaneously beating heart. We collected God knowledge and human
knowledge from all over the planet due to our law and our Bill of Rights and so legislated
the creation force.

Americans plant and grow souls; that is the fruit of the tree known as liberty. God
designed human beings for the purpose of discovery!
You bang around the universe exercising your rights and making decisions and so come
to know yourself and God. You have no choice due to that heart and that vibrant clash of
everyone else's beliefs as belief, proof and faith are three different things and while we all
may have differing beliefs and our own proof is that - our own - our faith is a single
universal truth: God equally protects and duly processes us all so any American can and
may equally protect and duly process themselves as that is our inviolate law. It is exactly
worded.

America and American law is one giant rescue mission whereby you decide to rescue
your own self and then will it. The founders did not write it down as it is a given: God
helps those who help themselves!

To be American is to deliberately, knowingly and willingly use the Declaration and use
the Constitution; the law contains the invisible blueprints for building a bridge of human
hearts so that you can cross to the other side. You will then possess a map of your own
soul and know your reasoning for being here. When one does this they become American,
as big as the planet and know they are not only a part of the universe but an actual
universe unto themselves, a special and unique creation with a special and unique gift
they are born to realize. I know why America came into being and we were meant to
survive our early brushes with extinction as a new nation: America is where the Holy
Grail and Excalibur came to rest at last.

The Declaration is the Grail as it gave birth to us or is our mother. The Grail was the once
real chalice lost in Britain and it is our will as Christ was teaching the Apostles how to
have will in the face of all odds. Men do not give birth and so Christ's physical suffering
was him experiencing the pain women feel and the danger, even death, they expose
themselves to when they give birth. As all women have will as they give birth men must
come to own it through sacrifice. In all suffering there is birth. That is being a mother.
You do not aspire to suffer or die but you must be willing as that is how you defend life.
The Constitution is the blade, our father, as it is our legal power or our weapon. It is
Excalibur of the Arthurian legend based upon once real persons. It is the means of using
the intrinsic power of our humanity the Declaration birthed. You must be of the ability to
wield the blade as you must act upon your will. Will alone is not enough as even in death
things are born; death can be the defense of life. You do not aspire to kill another and you
never come to want to kill but you must be willing, as that is being a father. As parents,
as ethical creators, Americans give birth to actual people and to thoughts, feelings, ideas
and beliefs. We also kill actual people and kill thoughts, feelings, ideas and beliefs. So
far, we have excelled at killing mistaken beliefs but have failed miserably at killing other
people. I'm worried we're becoming successful.

The blade has been denied to women for so long they were not and are not of the ability
to defend themselves or their children, nor can they teach their children our law as faith
as our corruption passed completion as we sought to keep women from entering the
offices of legal power in this nation and as we invoked the name of Jesus and even God
to deny them our sons then became corrupted. Americans no longer have will as we set
up a system that keeps women out unless they too become corrupted or marry into it -
political influence or money - which is not actual power but only perceived power. We
have mistaken the blade for a piece of paper in the Smithsonian, religion, money,
weapons, a uniform or a singular office or title when it is not any of those things but a
piece of an actual physical force or real, actual power inside a person who is a
constitution, and intrinsic force when exerted can make the impossible happen.

If you have read the Arthurian legend, the Lady of the Lake reclaims Excalibur as Arthur
lay dying. Bedivere hurled Excalibur into the lake. The Lady reappeared several centuries
later but no one seems to have recognized she is standing in NY's harbor and that her
torch is our clue: together the chalice and the blade are the science behind miracles as
that, the law, is the reasoning for our miraculous survival and phenomenal success. Chief
Justice Rhenquist castled as a king and a rook do and hurled Excalibur as we lay dying. I
caught it and kept it hidden as one rule of military engagement is: Always arrive on the
scene of battle with at least one secret weapon. No one in FL, PA or especially
Rensselaer County, NY knew I possessed Excalibur and no one knew to look for the
chalice as they deny it exists: the distinct power of a woman.

The Lady of the Lake is representative of the mythical Titan of female memory and of all
the Titans only she and her brother did not marry. America is where male and female
memory meet and wed at last as this is the perfect idea God has of us as perfect absolutes.
Male and female is an outside condition but it is also an inside condition; it is a quality of
being human which is an actual force and so all of us are both woman and man. We all
have chalices and blades inside of us which we as Americans realize as our one vote, and
as men and women it is interdependent not totally independent we should aspire to
become as that is how we came into being - as We, the people. Liberty’s torch? An angel
with a flaming sword guards the tree of knowledge in Eden after the fall of man. Our law
is a map that led me to this exact knowledge. For centuries people have searched for this
in vain. This is the treasure the founders left for us. It is fact: Our founders were guided
by the hand of God.

We have to will ourselves to make more of the impossible possible. We have to make
miracles happen with deliberation. Native Americans say that once we can stand upon the
roofs of our houses we must not go back inside them. Once you liberate yourself you
must remain liberated, defiant even, and not give aid and comfort to the old enemies of
your state. We cannot seek to rectify or change the past. You must live in the present for
the future or else all is lost. Seeking to undo what is done is how history becomes myth
and America and its potential must not become myth. Myth is history, fact that then
becomes a story, then a legend and then a myth. In all myth there is truth. The difference
between the myth of fingerprints and the proof of life is living people. The difference is I.
I sprang from the founder's heads like Athena from Zeus!

The egg laid in Philadelphia and hatched all over this Earth that we call our law was
inside the chicken and inside that egg is an unrealized vote that yet contains another egg
containing an unrealized vote and so on and so on that then becomes 300 million votes as
one, and then a whole universe, and it all began when that first person looked into the
stars and wondered Who? and Why? It became real when a group of men, supported by a
group of women, had the courage to declare to the world in 1776 that they were who and
I was why; that God was who and We were why. These people moved across the water,
rolled over mountains and stirred in the desert so that I could claim for my own self that
very same thing. I was their reasoning. I was able to stand upon the roof of my American
soul as if it were a ship and sail among the stars and throughout all of time because of
self-evidence: the feelings, the words, the acts and the compass and the chart that are
their fingerprints and is proof of their lives.

My creation and my facts are proof of God but my person, who I am, is proof of July 4th,
1776 and December 15th, 1787. I, Susan, am a national treasure as I am gold that has
been tested in fire. I, Susan, rose to the level of proof by making that same, first,
terrifying leap of faith.

I can teach every American what it is to be and feel as if they are American. I can teach
every American how to use their one vote and the law to do the very same thing I have
done, drink from the chalice and wield Excalibur so that they too become proof beyond
doubt and may then live this factual claim as their true belief or faith:

I am a Native American, an indigenous person of Earth.

Susan Herbert,
December 2007

How this petition will be in aid of the court’s appellate jurisdiction, 20.3: The
Supreme Court of the United States may not apply the law justly in ANY appellate cases
or extend its appellate jurisdiction to ANY cases involving women and children justly or
even apply the law justly upon hearing ANY petitions whatsoever as it is impossible to
reason the law if the court does not know something. You might reason it but your
reasoning will be faulty; it will not be just. No man knows as absolute fact what it is to
live your life as a natural born female citizen or to give birth. Even if you make the right
or correct final decision your reasoning then gives rise to mistaken beliefs and violations
of separation of power as evidenced by Rotsker V Goldberg. Rotsker is the correct
decision however its reasoning is faulty; it became a violation of separation of power as it
gave constitutional authority of women to the Congress and made the military come to
believe as fact this nation would never, ever let a woman command. I do not know how to
word this any clearer: What is the point of exercising your appellate jurisdiction if from a
time before you do no person who is a woman or a child will receive justice? Even if you
rule for them other women and children will then be harmed. What is the point in even
existing as a court of law? If you cannot rule for all women and then all children BOTH
male and female then you cannot rule justly for all of humanity as two men do not give
actual birth and as there are only two kinds of baby humans – girls and boys. Knowledge
actually is realized as just, fair and equivalent legal power. In order to realize the promise
of our law and Brown I must be heard. Brown hasn’t been successful as you cannot
liberate children but yet persecute their mothers and then expect those children to then
overcome their victimization. It is an impossible standard.
The type of writ I am seeking, 20.1: both in the alternative. “The issuing of
mandamus…is constitutionally vested in the Supreme Court…but a mandamus directed
at a public officer, belongs to original jurisdiction…and is restricted to certain specified
cases that do not comprehend a mandamus. The latter clause of the above section to
persons holding office under the authority of the US is therefore not warranted by the
constitution and void.” 1 Cranch, R. 175. This does not apply in this case. I am the United
States in this case and Bush was not legally elected and never had my consent at all and
as he changed his story, in my opinion came without moral authority even. He would not
have been on the ballot in 2004 if not for Bush V Gore. He is not acting under the
authority of the US as because a judge writes it on a piece of paper does not make it real
or constitutional. The title doesn’t make you. “Consent” and “authority” is also living out
the law. And: you must first be the legally elected President to then cite executive
privilege. Bush and Cheney may cite executive privilege with those who acted upon the
true belief Bush was the legal President but not with me. For instance, is Nancy Pelosi
going to claim she always knew he was not? Pull her federal tax record and news footage
of her referring to him as the President. I argue so far Bush has done only one thing to act
as a President and Commander should: He arrives to accept blame. Close but no
President. I ask you as it seems obvious to me: Is he accepting blame for Dick Cheney?
He should be accepting accountability and responsibility for his own decisions. I argue at
least he’s doing one thing no other “elected” person is doing. I have heard other
Americans objecting. Some have written entire books. Further, if I chose to challenge
both of his appointments to this court I could. Who’s in charge? It’s quite the conundrum
unless you are me and lived and then reasoned this case. I do not choose to challenge
those appointments. Even John Roberts himself is to get one equal and due chance. I’m it.
I have no conflict of interest as our interest is in upholding the law and am of the belief
both can hear my case and rule justly. I have no evidence they lack ability, capability or
willingness. The only legal, constitutional reason Bush’s Supreme Court appointments,
as they have violated the rights of life, liberty, happiness and equal protection and due
process of women, have authority is because I, the United States, say so. I’m willing to
appear. It isn’t a matter of how or why women’s rights and my own came to be violated. I
know how and why. It’s not as if his appointments are getting up and going to work
thinking, “Gee, how can I harm women today?” and then acting upon it. All 9 do not
know something. The Court may not rely on past precedent when no past ruling may
cover this unique issue as it is a first in the history of the world. As I attempted to enter
other courts and as I was denied and as Bush V Gore set new precedent as will I by
closing this door, then I can be granted original jurisdiction and mandamus. But, as I did
attempt to enter other courts and as I am challenging Austin V Herbert also, is this then
even original jurisdiction? I knew as early as 1999 this was the case for EP&DP as I told
my attorney. Marbury challenged the constitutional authority of the President and this
court and the limits of power; he did not go into other courts. I challenge the
constitutional authority of men over women; I’ve been in or tried to enter other courts
and was denied any and all justice and then denied entry. I believe parts of my claim do
constitute original jurisdiction but if I am the President do I need to ask a court to
overturn Austin v Herbert? My claim is it was never legal. I only could not and did not
take my kids due to violence that leaves us in harm’s way. Federal precedent says I can
walk up to where they are and take them back if we would then be safe from worse harm
as does common sense. As a mother, I have thought about acting upon federal precedent
and shooting one of the third parties in the knee caps in order to get a criminal hearing.
Even if you consider Austin v Herbert, did the NY court throwing out my petitions for
modification then make this original jurisdiction as they directly addressed corruption,
graft and the unconstitutionality of the court activity which were never before heard? I
am of the true belief, in this case, you can indeed grant me original jurisdiction and
mandamus as not one of these persons – those in chain of command - has or ever had
authority.

Federalist 23 is clear: The founders could not plan for all emergencies and we must deal
with them as they arise. They expected us to be of the ability to think on our feet or to
learn what we do not know and then act. Federalist 10 is clear: Address the cause if
possible but if not address the most damaging effect. Marbury is clear: We’re peers. You
must act. Lastly, we can hold this hearing without any of the named “elected” officials.
Americans have the ability to handle this; mayhem will not ensue as I can and will lead.

I’m not suing Bush as the person who is President, I’m suing him as the guy who acts
upon the mistaken belief he is the legal President. While he says it is his true belief, he
has also said things to contradict this and his actions do not match up with that as his true
belief.

I also ask for mandamus against those mentioned above – those in chain of command:
Dick Cheney, Robert Byrd and Nancy Pelosi. No one votes for Veep; we just get him. As
for Byrd and Pelosi once again they possess no authority as that would be the law and all
three broke our law. Some of their actions rise to criminal acts or so I believe. I’m the
law; I’m the authority and I’m not giving it away to them as I never did to begin with.
These people could not order me out of a paper bag; they can try but it will not happen as
I do not obey unreasonable, illegal orders that are against our law and all common sense.
If I must I’ll ask for mandamus against Roberts as he too is acting without the authority
and in violation of the law as evidenced by Carhart and because of Bush V Gore. This
seems pointless but I must cover my bases. If he appears and acts as Chief he’s answering
my complaint. If I show up I’m consenting to him being the legal, actual Chief Justice.
That then is authority. A decision for me is not consent and authority; he and I acting is
consent and authority as then he will be obeying the law merely by hearing this case no
matter the decision. Asking for mandamus in no way makes me recognize Bush as the
authority; if the clerks insist upon this in order to file me I’ll write it down but I tried to
tell them: The actual, legal authority, me, does not then go around asking Bush or anyone
to appear. I issue orders. Then they choose to obey the law or not. That’s liberty!

I seek a writ of prohibition removing my case, Austin V Herbert, from the jurisdiction
of NY as NY never had the authority to hear it once they refused me standing. The two
states with a jurisdictional claim would have been FL then NY but first the federal
government. As former Navy dependents we were first injured by the federal government
and the most important records (if they still exist) are held by Naval Station Mayport and
NAS Jax, now downsized. I argue that a military court could have heard my case
especially as I am arguing that I am the person legally charged with the duty to act as
President and Commander. They denied reality. The only court of law left is the Supreme
Court as NY has now thrown at two petitions at this writing. When the first one was
tossed and no letter was sent acknowledging recepit of it, I phoned the court. First the
clerk said NY would not hear an emergency petition from out of state. I said, “1, NY
cannot create the emergency and then refuse to address it and 2, extraordinary
circumstances. There’s always a first. Where’s my letter of receipt?” She asked for my
name. When I said it she screamed, I mean screamed, “YOU will not be heard in this
court!” She repeated it; not my case but my person – Susan Herbert. Custody does not go
away until the child is dead but legally 18 or in some states older as records are kept until
21 or 25. This case is not closed. NY needs to be made give me my children back and to
give up this case as not only can I prove criminal activity occurred but that I may not be
the only victim or so it seems at this point. Can I seek a writ against Bush to stop him
from acting? I am of the true belief Bush Jr. had some knowing about Bush V Gore based
upon a fact of his life that he related to a reporter in an interview.

The exceptional circumstances that warrant the Court’s discretionary powers, 20.1:
Illegal and in violation of the law activity occurred in four counties, three states and upon
the federal level. I have been denied access to all courts in which I am supposed to be
allowed entry and only as I am a woman. The reasoning used to deny me any appearance
might sound as if it is legal and not faulty, but it is a violation of Article 4 Section 4 as it
is a denial of reality and is domestic violence that then denies all a Republican form of
government. It in no way matches the complaint I entered or the exactly worded law or
any exactly worded precedent as in Bush V Gore, Santowsky, or Lassiter. My own self
will set precedent. In each and every case it is actually because of discrimination of my
person as a woman; in the NY court it was graft. I entered over 120 county, state and
federal records to the federal court all of which they ignored when they reasoned their
decisions. I entered the guilty persons own words as proof; they too were ignored. They
even went so far as to deny my actual birth and my DNA as it proved I was a natural born
citizen and a human. They also violated the separation of powers as a judge of that court
then ruled upon a suit to exercise my right of dissolution via liability that was against
other federal judges and some in his own court! That is not legal; it is equivalent to
impeachment and so he cannot then review it. Most appalling? One judge actually ripped
one single word from a 25 issue suit containing these very same federal questions and
then tried to force Rooker to fit; he ignored everything I wrote and in the end, my actual
complaints were not recognizable in his order or any order not even any custody order.
Exact lies were told with exact words at times. Exact violations of our Bill of Rights were
made with exact words. See the NY 3rd District’s “other things were considered” when
they were not named as nothing else was considered. Except that NY interchanged
“involuntary” with “voluntary” as I am the lone woman who did not wait until my
children were injured and so NY had a problem on its hands. In effect it ruled I had no
right to custody of the children I risked my life giving birth to and shed my blood over
UNLESS I was willing to allow them to be injured; in effect it ruled that unless I became
a child abuser NY was denying me custody and my property right as then the states
would be liable as asking for help is not a crime. NY knew it broke the law granting
standing to the third parties in 2001 after denying me standing in 1999; it had to then
“explain away” how all of this ever came to happen. So, it made up “other things were
considered” as custody is not about guilt. They ignored details of an enforced legal
kidnapping as it was only possible due to deceitfully gained court orders and abuse of the
system which became a crime in NY. I was not present for the first hearing in PA nor
could I be as I was in the hospital due to my injuries and the state of PA knew this as fact.
The social worker had my address and phone number in the hospital and did not tell the
judge or so I was told – by the worker as he said it was useless due to policies. He told
me the judge read that those before the court were named as violent offenders on the
paperwork he submitted and yet still chose to award my children and my own person to
them as: PA refuses to spend the money on keeping children in fostercare if any family
member, even the person causing injury, is before the court. This worker told me: PA does
not believe women are worth spending the money; PA believes all women are a waste of
time and money. If I knew of that policy, if he told me when he came to place my kids in
the custody of PA at my own request, and if my injuries were not so severe and disabling,
I would have simply bought a gun and shot the third parties as nobody can possibly repay
me for what we suffered. There isn’t enough money in this world. FL will not open a case
unless NY sends a certified copy of its decision. What NY sends me is not acceptable or
so I was told when denied entry repeatedly. The clerk will not “let” me see a judge or file
me. Duval County, FL tried to force me to hire an attorney; its excuse for not allowing me
entry was it had no code for emergency change of venue then that no person ever filed
what I was filing then that no women ever represent themselves upon such a complicated
motion. Duval County has no reasoning but only excuse. It’s legal limbo. They make up
rules, change the condition or set up obstacles that are impossible to overcome as they
ask me to do what is not humanly possible like force another to obey the law or resolve a
Catch 22 situation they have created. As Jax Federal Court charges $1 per page I cannot
copy my original attachment as it would cost in excess of $200.00 + and I had no reason
to expect them to deny me entry. Oh – not 3 states 4 states violated my person as a
woman: SC arrested me, made up the charge, then the cop admitted: You’re a woman;
you wouldn’t cry so I arrested you. Federal court has the “ticket”, a bond which has an
exact lie printed upon it and which I can prove using SC’s own law is indeed a lie; it is a
made up charge. I was forced to pay this bond against my will as I was told I would
remain in jail unless or until I paid it. I was told: If you argue with the judge he will keep
you in jail; you cannot get a trial by jury as we do not give you that. SC interfered with
my custody case as I was on my way to FL to secure the records I needed to prove my
case against PA and NY. I never secured those records due to this action. The local cops,
state police, and the FBI take their victim as they find her. If they then compound the
injury or act with deliberation to make my situation worse or cause me more injury they
then compound liability. Deshaney V Winnebago is clear: The government DOES have a
duty and is liable for the actions of private individuals that cause a citizen injury and
harm IF the government is directly involved. The county or state can fail to investigate or
fail to act but it cannot reason or decide we are so unsafe after investigating that it places
us in protective custody and then, turn around and expose us to gross injury as it knew
better. PA and NY owned the knowledge. PA placed my children in protective custody
then acted with deliberation to injure them as did NY. NY State placed me in protective
custody and unfortunately for NY, that was in the very county of Rennselaer as my
situation was deemed to be so very dangerous and so very unsafe that it was feared I
would be murdered.
I’ve lost rack of all of the exceptional conditions and circumstances there are so many.

The exceptional circumstance is a war as its evidence was proven to be no good. The
exceptional circumstance is federal precedent which violates the spirit of our law says
one must be a victim of the government’s policy before pressing suit. I was and still am
denied entry. The exceptional circumstance is Bush V Gore and all of its effects. The
exceptional circumstance is my judicial fate only as I am a woman was sealed before I
entered a court of law and I have been made to make my whole case in the complaint.
The exceptional circumstance is the discrimination of women is now absolute and past
completion. This is discrimination and harm I was born into and as it now resides in the
Supreme Court it is not possible to escape it in any other court. No state court will grant
me some of my remedy and relief, no state can grant me some of my remedy and relief,
the other federal judges are afraid and unwilling to do so and as this is a constitutional
authority case it can only be decided by the Supreme Court. Again, unlike Marbury I tried
other courts first and unlike Marbury, new precedent named Bush V Gore only existed in
2000. What began as me invoking the law and precedent known as Sankowsky V Kramer
and asking the state for help to escape violence as it was made impossible for me to do so
by this nation then became a crime as abusers and batterers were allowed to harm me and
my children unchecked and because of unjust, unwritten policy used by the states and
federal government but denied as not existing. If it did not exist or graft had not then
occurred in NY you would not be reading this petition as I would have no claim as I have
never broken the law without just cause and never harmed another deliberately. I was
told: As the Supreme Court is not making us stop we can harm you so we will. Unless we
get a piece of paper from the Supreme Court telling us we can no longer harm women we
will harm you. We can so we will. That is deliberation. They did not count on my 200 IQ.
Or my will. I am the extraordinary circumstance! I am the extraordinary condition! My
life is extraordinary! In case this nation and all of the citizens who crossed my path and
failed me or acted to injure me further do not get it: I alone am the just cause. You do not
need any other reason. Is this nation blaming me and finding me guilty of being born?
I am not to be faulted for existing; my parents and God are guilty of creating me.

There is one, single cause of my situation: Creation, and then The Fall of Man when
Adam placed blame on Eve for what he did his own self of his own will and liberty when
he had proof beyond doubt of God as he was first and God taught him how things worked
and God gave him, not Eve, the explicit terms of his contractual obligations in exchange
for the free use of Eden and it is implied that Adam then told Eve all of the facts or Bush
V Gore: The absolute, endemic discrimination of women now past completion which has
been realized as a gross violation of separation of power in all branches and an absolute
and whole violation of our governing documents that has served to change who we are as
a nation.

It is literally killing us; it is physically and spiritually killing us. We are dying.