Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Assessing Impacts
&
Methodologies Involved
Dr. Muhammad Anwar Baig
Professor
IESE, NUST
H - 12,, Islamabad
[28-06-2010]
Review: Definition of EIA
Environmental
9 Impact Assessment is
A formal process for identifying:
likely effects of activities or Environment
E i t is
i
projects on the broadly interpreted:
ENVIRONMENT, and on physical, biological,
human health and welfare.
welfare and social.
The impact
p of an activity
y is
a deviation (a change) The baseline
from the baseline situation situation is the
that is caused by the existing
environmental
activity. situation or
condition in the
The components of
Env Health Disease vectors, pathogens
interest are those that
are likely to be affected
Flora Composition and density of
by your activityor natural vegetation,
upon which your productivity, key species
activity depends for its
s ccess
success Special Key species
ecosystems
The baseline situation
ble
Water tab
not simply a snapshot.
snapshot
Describing the baseline
situation requires describing
both the normal variability in
environmental components &
current trends in these time
components.t This chart of
groundwater levels
shows both variability
and a trend over time
time.
9 a desired
An activity is:
accomplishment or
output Accomplishing an activity
E.g.: a road, seedling requires a set of actions
production, or river
ACTIVITY: ACTIONS:
diversion to irrigate market access Survey, grading, culvert
land road construction compaction,
construction, compaction
rehabilitation etc. . .
Approject
j or program
p g may y
consist of many activities
The EIA process
Phase II:
Phase I:
Full EIA study
Initial inquiries
(if needed)
Understand
Understand Scope
proposed activities Evaluate baseline situation
Identify & choose alternatives
Screen Identify and characterize potential
Conduct
C d t preliminary
li i impacts of proposed activity and
assessment (if each alternative
needed) Develop mitigation and monitoring
Communicate and document
Our focus!
Phase 1 of the EIA Process
Understand Screen the Conduct a
Phase I Phase II
proposed activity Preliminary
activity Assessment
Based on the ACTIVITY IS SIGNIFICANT BEGIN
Why is the nature of the OF MODERATE A rapid, ADVERSE FULL
activity being activity what OR UNKNOWN simplified EIA IMPACTS EIA
proposed? level of RISK study using POSSIBLE STUDY
environmental simple tools SIGNIFICANT
What is being review is (e.g. the ADVERSE
proposed? indicated? USAID IEE) IMPACTS
VERY UNLIKELY
ACTIVITY IS LOW
RISK (Of its nature, STOP
very unlikely to have the EIA
significant adverse process
impacts)
ACTIVITY IS
HIGH RISK (Of its
nature, likely to have
significant adverse
impacts)
Phase 1 of the EIA process:
Screen the activity
Screen each
activity
screening
i classifies
l ifi the
th activity
ti it into
i t
Based on the
nature of the
a RISK CATEGORY:
activity, what VERY LOW RISK EIA process ends
level of
environmental VERY HIGH RISK Do full EIA study
analysis is
indicated? MODERATE OR Do preliminary
UNKNOWN RISK assessment
!
disagree with the preparers
Screening determinations
determines whether Sets out mitigation and
the preliminary monitoring for adverse impacts
assessment is
necessary
Phase 1 of the EIA process:
The Preliminary Assessment
Typical Preliminary
Assessment outline
Mitigation is.
is . .
9 The implementation of
measures designed
g to
reduce the undesirable
effects of a proposed
action on the
environment
3 Judge
J d th the Determine whether the predicted impacts are
significance of indeed significant!
potential impacts THIS WILL OFTEN DEPEND ON HOW
EFFECTIVE THE PROPOSED MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE!
! We only proceed to
Phase II of the EIA process
if
Phase I indicates that
a FULL EIA STUDY
is required
The full
Th f ll EIA study
t d has
h ! precedes the study
p y to ID
issues to be addressed
very similar objectives Analysis of environmental
and structure to a
preliminary
! impacts is much more
detailed
Commu
preliminary assessment is
the template for the steps Evaluate baseline
involved in a full EIA study: situation
s tuat o
nt through
environmental impacts
Compare alternatives
4. Mitigation & monitoring
Develop mitigation and
5. Recommended Findings
g monitoring
hout
Phase 2 of the EIA process:
The Full EIA study
y
9 In summary,
The full EIA study is a far
more significant effort than
the preliminary assessment
assessment.
Regulatory
Reg lator agencies/ However, it is good practice
However
Review authorities for preliminary assessments
because:
Broad-based ppublic
Communities Predicting impacts is
Civil society FACILITATED by broad-
Private Sector based public consultation;
Judging significance is very
difficult without it.
Transparency and
accessibility require
disclosure to stakeholders
Making EIA effective
To be an effective tool
for ESD,
ESD EIA must be: EIA is undertaken early enough
a integral part of the to affect project design
project
p j development
p Mitigation and monitoring
developed in the EIA process is
cycle.
implemented.
AIR
PRECIPITATION
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
SURFACE OCEAN
LAND
WATER
GROUND
WATER
List of Environmental Factors
There is
Th i no single
i l approach h for
f developing
d l i a list
li t off
environmental factors. Four approaches have been
useful:
Using various agency guidelines
General knowledge anticipating impacts of
projects
Some kind of listed environmental parameters
Study impacts from other projects
Example: List of Parameters for Laying Gas
Pipeline
3. Socioeconomic Considerations
Economic development, with & without project,
population, residences, industries, business etc.
4
4. Air and Water Environment
1. Prevailing climate, quality of air, fog, smog
2. Hydrology and hydrography surface, groundwater,
fresh brackish
fresh, brackish, saline
saline, drainage
3. Air, noise and water quality and effect of activities
5. Unique Features including archeological ,
historical and scenic site & values
Potential Impacts can be Observed
Construction phase
Displacement of people
Noise during g construction tucks,, mechinary
y etc
Soil erosion and disturbance of natural drainage
Interference with water table
W
Water pollution
ll i
Air pollution
Damage to wildlife habitat
Commitment on resources cement, steel, wood
Safety hazards
Potential Impacts can be Observed
(cont..
(cont
Earth
Mineral, soils, unique physical features, land form
Water
Surface
Surface, ground
ground, ocean
ocean, quality
quality, recharge
recharge, temperature
temperature,
recharge, snow, ice, glaciers
Atmosphere
Climate
Cli t (micro,
( i macro),
) temperature,
t t quality
lit
Processes
Floods, erosion, solution, sorption, compaction, stability, air
movements
II - Biological
Flora
Trees
Shrubs
Grass
Crops
Aquatic plants
Endangered
E d d species
i
Barriers
Corridors
C id
II Biological ..
Fauna
Birds
Land animals including reptiles
Fish
Benthic organisms
Insects
Endangered
E d d species
i
Microfauna
Barriers
B i & corridors
id
III Social/Cultural Factors
A Land Use
Wilderness and open space
Wetlands
F
Forestry
t
Grazing
Agriculture
R id ti l
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Mining and quarrying
III - Cultural Factors
B Recreation
Hunting
Fishing
Boating
Swimming
Camping and hiking
Picnicking
Resorts
III - Cultural Factors
C Aesthetics and Human Interests
Scenic views and Vistas
Wilderness qualities
Open space qualities
Landscape design
Unique physical features
Parks
P k and d reserves
Monuments
Rare
R andd unique
i species/ecosystem
i /
Historical or archeological sites
III - Cultural Factors
D Cultural Status
Cultural patterns (life
style)
Health and safety
Employment
Population density y
III - Cultural Factors
E Constructed facilities and Activities
Structures
Transportation network
Utility networks
Waste disposal
Barriers
corridors
IV Ecological
g Factors
Identification
Prediction
Prediction
Evaluation
Evaluation
Methods of Impact Assessment
Identification:
description off existing environmental systems
Determination of components of the projects
Definition of the environment modified
Prediction
Identification of significant environmental changes
Forecasting
F ti the
th quantity
tit and/or
d/ spatial
ti l dimensions
di i
Estimation of probability that impact will occur
Evaluation
Determination of cost and benefits to user groups
Specification and comparison of the trade offs
between various alternatives
EIA METHODS
Ad-hoc
Checklist
Simple checklists
Descriptive
p checklists
Scaling checklists
Scaling Weighting checklists
Matrices
Interaction Matrices
Moor Impact Matrix
Stepped Matrix
Overlays
Networks
Advanced Cost - Benefit Cost Effectiveness Analysis
y
Modeling
Environmental Impact
p
Assessment (EIA)