Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
written by: Joe Taylor Jr. edited by: Rebecca Scudder updated: 2/25/2013
Project managers can cover the first four phases of the project cycle by conducting a comprehensive
feasibility study. The first part of this five-part series examines the role that a feasibility study can play
in any kind of organization.
Plenty of successful entrepreneurs have built businesses on the back of a
napkin. Or, at least, thats how they tell the story. In reality, every good idea in a business must first
survive a rigorous project feasibility study. For many project managers, a feasibility study represents
the first four phases of the project cycle.
People love ideas. They come to us in the blink of an eye, or even in our dreams. Although it can be tempting to
tackle a compelling new idea head on, project management veterans understand the importance of reviewing the
opportunities and the challenges posed by a project. Because project management professionals tend to focus on
getting things done, it can sometimes be hard to look at the overall viability of a new idea.
According to some business experts, only about one idea out of fifty has any real chance of long-term success.
Making sure your idea falls within that two percent success rate can prevent time and resources from being devoted
to a project that will probably fail, regardless of the execution. A well-orchestrated project feasibility study provides
the kind of impartial analysis that can separate profitable ideas from unproductive brainstorms.
Often, the biggest source of criticism for a project feasibility study will come from the person or the team that
championed the idea in the first place. Strong leaders can develop the ability to conduct a project feasibility study on
their own ideas, since they have learned how to make peace with the fact that not every idea deserves to be fully
explored.
First time entrepreneurs or project managers may prefer to conduct a such a study study with help from another
professional or an outside consultant. External perspective can make or break a project idea: if it makes sense to
an impartial third party, it will probably make sense to pursue as a project.
The previous article in this series introduced a startling statistic: Only one idea out of fifty has what it
takes to succeed in business. For project managers and other professionals that dont always get to
brainstorm, its easy to fall in love with an idea. However, experienced business veterans understand
the importance of performing due diligence" on what may seem like a slam-dunk idea. Experts have
documented four moments in the life of a business when the importance of a feasibility study is
greater than ever.
Many entrepreneurs look at the launch of a new business as a short-term project that can get them to a sustainable
profit level. Business veterans often review two feasibility studies: one to determine the long term viability of the
business, and another to understand the resources necessary for a successful launch. During the original dot com
bubble" in the late 1990s, many companies overlooked the importance of feasibility studies, leaping into venture-
backed businesses without abandon. Anyone who remembers Pets.com, Kozmo.com, Webvan.com, or hundreds of
other high profile failures understands what can happen when companies cant sustain themselves.
General Electric has become famous for experimenting with new products and services, some of which might not
seem like a perfect fit for a company with roots in engineering. However, a company that understands the importance
of feasibility studies can make strategic decisions that reap major dividends. Building a routine process for feasibility
studies within an organization helps develop a culture of experimentation without putting the entire company at risk.
Smart executives and savvy project managers understand how to leverage the learnings from a solid
feasibility study into a more efficient project cycle. Let's consider the four key advantages you can
work to your benefit.
Effective feasibility studies can do more than just help executives choose which projects to greenlight.
Managers involved in a feasibility study can actually use much of the same data to shape the project
planning process. Four main advantages to feasibility studies can generate crucial insight for approved
projects.
1. Understanding Demand
Feasibility studies always analyze whether a real demand exists for a product or a service. This holds true for internal
projects as well as for potential consumer offerings. For example, a project manager tasked with launching a
customer relationship management system can examine the real demand for specific features, based on feedback
from customers and from staff. The resulting data can shape the priority list, which impacts both the budget and
timeline. This way, project managers can avoid spending resources on features or projects with low impact and low
demand among end users.
2. Assessing Resources
Another of the advantages of feasibility studies is the opportunity to catalog the current resources available for a
project and to estimate the need for additional resources. Feasibility studies that recommend against projects often
cite a lack of human resources or financial capital. This kind of result gives a project manager the opportunity to reset
expectations based on real budgets and headcount.
3. Marketing Feasibility
Even for products and services with measurable demand, companies must examine their ability to spread the word
about a new offering. During the evaluation process, project managers learn whether the market is already over
saturated with stronger competitors. Company leaders can also discover any potential legal roadblocks involving
trademarks, patents, or other intellectual property rights.
4. Marking a Timeline
One of the biggest advantages of a feasibility study is the validation of a prospective timeline. When
moving into a formal project planning phase, a project manager can use data generated by the study
to help set milestones and deadlines. A quality feasibility study examines the timetable suggested by
project sponsors for potential delays or breakdowns. When project managers use a study as the basis
for making timeline decisions, they run the least risk of being overruled by anxious stakeholders.
The first step to an effective feasibility study method involves a critical analysis of the competitive
landscape for a product or service. Many first-time entrepreneurs make the mistake of assuming that
their product has no competition. In reality, any other way in which a customer allocates money, time,
or attention can be viewed as competition. The feasibility study should paint a realistic picture of the
likelihood that enough customers will be satisfied to result in a sustainable offering.
Understanding the needs of the marketplace does not always guarantee the ability to meet customers expectations.
Including this analysis in the feasibility study method puts the overall requirements for a successful project into
the proper context. In many cases, a study can help determine whether the project sponsor will require more
resources internally or whether an outside vendor or partnership can handle the tasks more effectively.
By following the accepted feasibility study method, project managers and their teams can reach the point of
delivering their findings to stakeholders. The written report generated at the conclusion of the feasibility study can
help move a team into the presentation phase of the project cycle. Moving readers through the following
feasibility study steps can clarify questions about the studys recommendations.
Executive Summary
The most important page of the report is often the only page that many stakeholders actually take the time to read.
Although it should always be presented on the first page of a report, the executive summary is a digest of the
following five feasibility study steps.
Clear Project Description
of the project as it is defined for the study can help stakeholders understand the questions asked and the results
generated. Stating the project description in very basic terms removes uncertainty about a project for
stakeholders who might otherwise be unfamiliar with the ideas the project represents.
Competitive Landscape
Reviewing the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats faced by a project helps decision makers focus on
the big picture. In some organizations, leaders may not want to approach a new market unless they know they can
dominate it. Other companies prefer to focus on profits gained instead of market share. Either way, the challenges
faced should be clearly defined, along with the consequences of failure.
Operating Requirements
When following this set of feasibility study steps, authors can use this point in the report to stay clear, focused,
and unbiased about a projects real needs. Project managers that understate the physical and fiscal resources
required for a new product or service often end up with failed projects or unfulfilled promises
Financial Projections
More than ever, Investors and CFOs pore over the financials in a feasibility study to make sure that
projects can generate the kind of scalable profits that warrant their approval. Expert project managers
emphasize the break-even analysis, a timeline view of the moment a project can pay for itself.
Summarizing all of the previous feasibility study steps, the recommendations and findings can shape
the outcome of a project proposal. Instead of simply stating a yes" or no" answer to the question of
project approval, this section offers an opportunity to enhance a project by pointing out areas of
opportunity.