Sei sulla pagina 1di 4

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Effect of dexamethasone on prevention of postoperative


nausea, vomiting and pain after caesarean section:
a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial
Monica M.S. Cardoso, Alexandre O. Leite, Elisa A. Santos, Judymara L. Gozzani and Lgia A.S.T. Mathias

Context Spinal morphine is a common form of postoperative Intervention Patients received either dexamethasone 10 mg in
analgesia after caesarean section, but it is associated with 100 ml of isotonic saline, intravenously or 100 ml of isotonic
postoperative nausea and vomiting. saline (placebo) prior to surgery.
Objective To evaluate the hypothesis that dexamethasone Main outcome Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting
reduces nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing caesarean in the first 24 h were rated and recorded. Pain scores at rest and
section under spinal anaesthesia with morphine. on movement were evaluated using a visual analogue scale.
Design Interventional, randomised, double-blinded, placebo- Results During the first 24 hours, nausea occured in 12/35
controlled study to evaluate a preoperative single dose of (34.4%) patients receiving dexamethasone and in 32/35
dexamethasone. (91.4%) receiving placebo (P < 0.001). During the same time
Setting Patients from a tertiary hospital in the city of Sao Paulo, period, vomiting occured in 12/35 (34.4%) patients receiving
Sao Paulo, Brazil observed from 1 January through 30 June dexamethasone and in 29/35 (82.9%) receiving placebo
2008. (P < 0.001). Pain at rest and pain on movement was lower in
Patients or other participants Seventy full-term pregnant patients who received dexamethasone at some time points
patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists 1 or 2) during the study period.
were studied. Patients were randomly allocated into Conclusion Dexamethasone reduced the cumulative incidence
two groups determined by a computerised table. Exclusion of nausea and vomiting after caesarean section under spinal
criteria were contraindication to regional anaesthesia, anaesthesia with morphine and lowered pain scores on the first
allergy to dexamethasone, opioids or local anaesthetics, postoperative day.
hypertension or diabetes originated during pregnancy and Eur J Anaesthesiol 2013; 30:102105
use of any antiemetic drug received before surgery. Spinal Published online 2 October 2012
anaesthesia consisted of hyperbaric bupivacaine and Keywords: anaesthesia, caesarean section, dexamethasone, morphine,
morphine. spinal

Introduction caesarean section under both epidural and spinal anaes-


A low dose of spinal morphine is probably the most thesia with 3 mg and 200 mg of morphine.14 Our current
common form of postoperative analgesia after caesarean protocol uses a much smaller dose of spinal morphine
section. Its main advantages are its low cost and simpli- (60 mg) in combination with systemic NSAIDs as part of a
city and the fact that a single spinal dose usually provides multimodal approach for analgesia after caesarean sec-
high-quality postoperative analgesia for a full 24 h. How- tion. Reducing the morphine dose may contribute to a
ever, dose-related side-effects, such as pruritus, nausea reduced incidence of nausea and vomiting in the
and vomiting, may occur. Nausea and vomiting may be postoperative period.
extremely unpleasant after caesarean section and may
The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether a
reduce the patients satisfaction, not only impairing the
single dose of dexamethasone given immediately before
quality of postoperative care but also jeopardising the
surgery prevented nausea and vomiting in patients
new mothers ability to take care of her baby.
undergoing caesarean under spinal anaesthesia utilising
Several strategies have been used to reduce the incidence a small dose of morphine.
of nausea and vomiting after caesarean section under
regional anaesthesia combined with opioids. Research Methods
has focused on various antiemetic agents, used either This interventional, double-blinded and randomised,
alone or in combination with other drugs in varying placebo-controlled study protocol was approved by the
regimens. A single dose of dexamethasone administered local Hospital Ethics Committee (Comite de Etica em
immediately before surgery has been shown to reduce the Pesquisa of Irmandade Santa Casa de Sao Paulo, Sao
incidence of nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Ethical Committee number:
269/07; Chairperson: Professor Dr Nelson Keiske Ono,
From the Faculdade de Ciencias Medicas da Santa Casa de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, date of meeting: 11 July 2007). Full-term pregnant
Sao Paulo, Brazil
patients (ASA physical status 1 or 2) undergoing elective
Correspondence to Dr Lgia A.S.T. Mathias, Alameda Campinas 139/41, Sao
Paulo, SP 01404-000, Brazil
caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were recruited
E-mail: rtimao@uol.com.br and written informed consent was obtained from all
0265-0215 2013 Copyright European Society of Anaesthesiology DOI:10.1097/EJA.0b013e328356676b

Copyright European Society of Anaesthesiology. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.


Dexamethasone for nausea and vomiting after caesarean section 103

participants. Patients were invited to participate during measurements obtained immediately before the admin-
their admission to a pre-partum room. Patients were istration of spinal anaesthesia. After their infants were
excluded if they had any contraindication to receiving delivered, patients received ketoprofen 100 mg, dipyrone
regional anaesthesia; were allergic to dexamethasone, to 2 g and oxytocin 15 IU intravenously. Starting 6 h after
opioids or local anaesthetics; presented with pregnancy- delivery, patients received diclofenac 75 mg orally every
induced hypertension or diabetes; or had received any 8 h and dipyrone 2 g every 6 h.
antiemetic drug in the 24 h prior to the scheduled
caesarean section. The study was double-blinded and the anaesthesiologist
who was responsible for the postoperative evaluations
Patients were randomly allocated into two groups using a
was not present during surgery. The evaluations were
computer-generated table and received a single dose of
performed every hour for the first 3 h and then at 6, 12 and
dexamethasone 10 mg in 100 ml 0.9% saline immediately
24 h following the administration of spinal morphine.
prior to surgery or placebo (100 ml 0.9% saline).
The primary endpoint was the incidence of nausea and
Spinal anaesthesia was administered with 15 mg of hyper- vomiting in the first 24 h after surgery. Patients who had
baric bupivacaine and 60 mg of morphine. Patients a nausea score more than 1 (0 no nausea; 1 mild;
received 10 ml kg1 of lactated Ringers solution. Blood 2 moderate; and 3 severe nausea) or who had two
pressure was measured every 3 min until delivery and or more episodes of vomiting were treated with dimen-
hypotension was treated with a 0.2 mg bolus of metar- hydrinate 50 mg and pyridoxine 10 mg. Pain was evalu-
aminol. Hypotension was defined as any decrease in the ated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) (0 no pain and
SBP from the control value defined as the mean of three 10 worst pain possible) at rest and on movement. To

Fig. 1

Enrolment
Assessed for eligibility (n = 455)

Excluded (n = 324)
Not meeting inclusion criteria (n = 324)
Declined to participate (n = 0)
Other reasons (n = 0)

Randomised (n = 131)

Excluded as not the first patient


on the day (n = 61)

Allocation
Allocated to dexamethasone (n = 35) Allocated to saline infusion (n = 35)
Received dexamethasone (n = 35) Received saline infusion (n = 35)
Did not receive dexamethasone (n = 0) Did not receive saline infusion (n = 0)

Follow-up
Lost to follow-up (n = 0) Lost to follow-up (n = 0)
Discontinued intervention (n = 0) Discontinued intervention (n = 0)

Analysis
Analysed (n = 35) Analysed (n = 35)
Excluded from analysis (n = 0) Excluded from analysis (n = 0)

Study flow diagram for 70 patients undergoing elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with low-dose morphine.

European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2013, Vol 30 No 3

Copyright European Society of Anaesthesiology. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.


104 Cardoso et al.

evaluate pain with movement, patients were asked to Table 2 The effect of dexamethasone on the incidence of nausea,
vomiting and pain at rest and with movement following caesarean
cough while in the recovery room and asked to sit in bed section under spinal anaesthesia
while in the ward. Breakthrough pain (>3 on the VAS or
Dexamethasone Control
when indicated as such by the patient) was treated with group group
tramadol 100 mg infused over 20 min. (n U 35) (n U 35) P

Fishers exact test was used to compare the incidence of At 1 h


nausea, vomiting, pain at rest and pain with movement at Nausea 6 (17%) 11 (31%) NS
Vomiting 6 (17%) 11 (31%) NS
multiple time points. The time to event analysis was Pain at rest 3 (9%) 9 (26%) NS
performed using KaplanMeier curves and the log-rank Pain with movement 5 (14%) 15 (43%) 0.001
At 2 h
test, considering nausea or vomiting as a unique event Nausea 4 (11%) 9 (26%) NS
and pain at any time within the first 24 h of treatment as Vomiting 4 (11%) 6 (17%) NS
an event. The sample size was determined prospectively; Pain at rest 4 (11%) 11 (31%) NS
Pain with movement 6 (17%) 14 (41%) NS
with 33 patients per group. A reduction in the incidence At 3 h
of nausea and vomiting from 35% to 10% at any time Nausea 1 (3%) 6 (17%) NS
Vomiting 1 (3%) 6 (17%) NS
within the first 24 h of treatment could be determined Pain at rest 6 (17%) 14 (41%) NS
with a statistical power of 85% (b0.85), assuming stat- Pain with movement 6 (17%) 14 (41%) NS
istical significance at 0.05 (a0.05). At 6 h
Nausea 1 (23%) 2 (6%) NS
Vomiting 1 (3%) 2 (6%) NS
Pain at rest 2 (6%) 12 (34%) 0.005
Results Pain with movement 4 (11%) 16 (46%) 0.003
Seventy full-term pregnant patients were studied (Fig. 1) At 12 h
from 1 January to 30 June 2008. Only patients who were Nausea 0 2 (6%) NS
Vomiting 0 2 (6%) NS
scheduled as the first procedure of the day were included. Pain at rest 4 (11%) 10 (29%) NS
The groups comprised 35 patients each and patient Pain with movement 4 (11%) 15 (43%) 0.006
characteristics were similar in the two groups (Table 1). At 24 h
Nausea 0 2 (6%) NS
The incidence of nausea and vomiting was similar Vomiting 0 2 (6%) NS
Pain at rest 5 (14%) 10 (29%) NS
between the two groups during the periods of obser- Pain with movement 5 (14%) 15 (43%) 0.01
vation. At 6 h pain at rest was lower in the group who
Values are number (proportion).
received dexamethasone. Pain with movement was lower
among patients who received dexamethasone at 1, 6, 12
and 24 h (Table 2). The cumulative incidence of nausea patients who underwent caesarean section under spinal
and vomiting for the period in the post-anaesthesia care anaesthesia, including spinal morphine, did not prevent
unit (up to 3 h after surgery) and in the ward (between 3 nausea and vomiting during the postoperative period. Wu
and 24 h after surgery) was lower in the patients who et al.1 observed a benefit when dexamethasone was used
received dexamethasone (Table 3). in combination with droperidol, and Nortcliffe et al.2
found that 50 mg of intravenous cyclizine alone was
better than dexamethasone. Both of the studies used a
Discussion much higher dose of morphine than we use in our current
Our results indicate a lower cumulative incidence of practice (200 vs. 60 mg) which may explain the difference
nausea and vomiting with dexamethasone, although in the incidence of nausea and vomiting between their
the incidence was not lower at all time points. Dexa- studies and ours (33 vs. 10%, respectively).
methasone also reduced pain scores at rest and with
movement during the first postoperative day. Jokela et al.5 reported similar findings with regard to
1 2 improved postoperative pain control; they found that
Wu et al. and Nortcliffe et al. found that a single dose
of dexamethasone administered to full-term pregnant dexamethasone 10 mg administered intravenously
immediately before induction of anaesthesia in patients
undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy reduced oxyco-
Table 1 Patient characteristics and postoperative nausea and done consumption during the first two postoperative
vomiting-related variables for 70 patients undergoing elective
caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia hours. However, it should be emphasised that the study
population, the anaesthetic technique and the surgical
Dexamethasone Control
group (n U 35) group (n U 35) procedure were different from those in our study. These
differences may explain why they observed a major
Age (years) 28.2 (5.4) 26.1 (5.3)
Weight (kg) 86.0 (6.3) 86.0 (6.5)
benefit only during the first 2 h, whereas in our study
Height (cm) 166.1 (3.9) 165.8 (3.4) dexamethasone was advantageous during the first 24 h. It
Previous PONV 17 19 is known that pregnancy may significantly modify the
Smoker 7 8
pain modulation process after a surgical procedure. The
Values are mean (SD) and number. PONV, postoperative nausea and vomiting. outcome measures also varied between the two studies:

European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2013, Vol 30 No 3

Copyright European Society of Anaesthesiology. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.


Dexamethasone for nausea and vomiting after caesarean section 105

Table 3 Incidence of nausea and vomiting in the post-anaesthesia care unit, ward and first 24 h in dexamthasone and control groups
Nausea (n U 35) Vomiting (n U 35)
Dexamethasone Control P Dexamethasone Control P

PACU (0 to 3 h) 11 26 <0.001 11 23 <0.01


Ward (3 to 24 h) 1 6 NS 1 6 NS
Total (0 to 24 h) 12 32 <0.001 12 29 <0.001

PACU, postanaesthesia care unit.

Jokela et al. used a reduction in the oxycodone consump- In conclusion, although we observed a trend towards a
tion of patients who were using patient-controlled analge- lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in
sia pumps, whereas we evaluated pain using VAS pain the dexamethasone group, this effect was significant only
scores at rest and on movement. Other studies have also when considering the cumulative incidence. It was also
demonstrated the potential benefits of steroids for associated with reduced pain scores during the first
improving the quality of postoperative analgesia, both postoperative day.
at rest and with movement, which is of special interest in
the obstetric population, as mothers generally want to Acknowledgements
take care of their babies. Wu et al. also demonstrated that Assistance with the study: the authors would like to thank
the VAS scores during rest or with movement between Dr Joaquim Vieira for his assistance with the study.
6 and 24 h postoperatively were lower in patients who Financial support and sponsorship: this work was supported by the
received dexamethasone.1 The analgesic effects of Department of Anaesthesiology, Santa Casa de Misericordia, Sao
steroids are mainly provided through peripheral inhi- Paulo, Brazil.
bition of phospholipase enzymes which decreases the
Conflicts of interest: none declared.
products of the cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase path-
ways in the inflammatory response.6 These character-
istics make dexamethasone a suitable drug for the References
1 Wu JI, Lo Y, Chia YY, et al. Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting
treatment of pain, both at rest and on movement.7 after intrathecal morphine for caesarean: a randomized comparison of
dexamethasone, droperidol and a combination. Int J Obstet Anesth 2007;
The potential side-effects of steroids used during the 16:122127.
postoperative period remain a concern. One of the major 2 Nortcliffe SA, Shah J, Buggy DJ. Prevention of postoperative nausea and
vomiting after spinal morphine for caesarean section: comparison of
problems is impaired wound healing during the acute cyclizine, dexamethasone and placebo. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90:665670.
postoperative period. However, meta-analyses indicate 3 Tzeng JI, Wang JJ, Ho ST, et al. Dexamethasone for prophylaxis of nausea
and vomiting after epidural morphine for post-caesarean section analgesia:
that a single dose of dexamethasone does not increase comparison of droperidol and saline. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85:865868.
infection or other complications.8,9 Another concern is 4 Wang JJ, Ho ST, Wong CS, et al. Dexamethasone prophylaxis of nausea
respiratory depression after the use of intrathecal mor- and vomiting after epidural morphine for post-caesarean analgesia. Can J
Anaesth 2001; 48:185190.
phine as constituent of a spinal anaesthesia. Although 5 Jokela RM, Ahonen JV, Tallgren MK, et al. The effective analgesic dose of
there was no specific protocol to address this side-effect, dexamethasone after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Anesth Analg 2009;
the dose used was considered to be small enough to carry 109:607615.
6 Mitchell JA, Warner TD. Cyclo-oxygenase-2: pharmacology, physiology,
a low risk of respiratory depression.10,11 biochemistry and relevance to NSAID therapy. Br J Pharmacol 1999;
128:11211132.
Our study included only a small number of participants 7 Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J. Preoperative
when the total number in our hospital is considered. The dexamethasone improves surgical outcome after laparoscopic
cholecystectomy. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
service is in a tertiary referral hospital and the majority of Ann Surg 2003; 238:651660.
patients admitted had pregnancy-related problems or 8 Henzi I, Walter B, Tramer MR. Dexamethasone for the prevention of
were hospitalised for some time prior to their due date. postoperative nausea and vomiting: a quantitative systematic review.
Anesth Analg 2000; 90:186189.
In addition, although patients may have declared an 9 Sauerland S, Nagelschmidt M, Mallmann P, Neugebauer EA. Risks and
understanding of the protocol, some were not included benefits of preoperative high dose methilprednisolone in surgical patients:
a systematic review. Drug Saf 2000; 23:449461.
because they were considered illiterate by the investi- 10 Gerancher JC, Floyd H, Eisenach J. Determination of an effective dose of
gator who interviewed them (M.M.C.S.). Thus, there was intrathecal morphine for pain relief after cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg
a risk of a type II error because the study did not have 1999; 88:346351.
11 Gehling M, Tryba M. Risks and side-effects of intrathecal morphine
sufficient power to detect a statistically significant differ- combined with spinal anaesthesia: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2009;
ence between the groups. 64:643651.

European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2013, Vol 30 No 3

Copyright European Society of Anaesthesiology. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

Potrebbero piacerti anche