Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Jill Griffith
Eng 138
15 March, 2017
In 1853 Hormuzd Rassam, an esteemed Assyriologist, uncovered the first known artifacts
containing the Epic of Gilgamesh (Britannica). This 4,000 year old epic illustrates many things:
the innovation of humans, the desire to create, the drive to excel, the passion of the mind. For as
long as there have been written words, there have been humans behind those words with a desire
to create lasting stories, notes, historical documents and many other forms of literature and
writing. The importance of this fact demonstrates that the human race has always had the desire
to say something significant. From Freuds consideration of the human mind, to Tysons
exploration of cosmic quandaries, the drive to create ideas and bridge concepts is a strong facet
of humanity. Arguably the most notable author in history, William Shakespeare, was no stranger
to these deep insights. Many of his most famous works, including Hamlet, Macbeth, and King
Lear explore the underlying aspects of human psychology. Shakespeare was a pioneer of the
mortal mind that explored the human psyche in new ways, expanding upon psychological
Shakespeare lived and experienced both the Elizabethan Era and Jacobean Era. During
these two reigns, the mentally ill faced treatment of quite similar fashions. Though there were
those who explored the human mind, and thought to have come up with adequate treatment,
there was no scientifically successful treatment for the mad during these eras. Treatments ranged
from hanging the ill upside down, to direct blood flow to the head, to chaining them in small,
Griffith 2
confined spaces. During Shakespeares time, The Bethlehem mental hospital was a prominent
figure in the treatment, or mistreatment, of those suffering from melancholy. Even during this
century, the hospital was known for its gross mistreatment of patients, even leading to the death
of some. Nicknamed Bedlam, this hospital quickly became the place to go only for the
mentally ill to become mentally insane. As a way to profit, Bethlehem Royal Hospital began
admitting the public for a fee to view the mentally ill patients. This became known as one of the
most scandalous plots that the hospital of Bethlehem had taken advantage of (Andrews).
The Bethlehem Royal Hospital is even briefly visited in Shakespeares King Lear. When
Gloucesters son, Edgar, is plotted against, he must flee for his life. His solution is to dirty and
This excerpt from King Lear shows that Bethlehem Royal Hospital, or Bedlam, was a significant
piece of identity for the mad during the 16th century. For it to surface in a piece of literature
written by Queen Elizabeths patron himself, is a strong indicator that the issues and problems
surrounding Bethlehem Royal Hospital were drastic and well known. The question that begs to
the insane, or if an outside factor influenced him to explore the mad, including Bethlehem Royal
In order to identify external factors, one must explore the timeline of Shakespeare.
Unfortunately, dates arent as cut and dry as one would like for a study of literature. However,
many scholars have attempted to define dates and times of many of Shakespeares tragedies. J.
Leeds Barroll, a prominent Shakespeare expert and author, wrote a concise theoretical essay on
precise dating of Shakespearian plays. In The Chronology of Shakespeares Jacobean Plays and
the Dating of Antony and Cleopatra Barroll states, A number of scholars have carefully
investigated the problem of Shakespeares tragic chronology, and nothing very different can arise
here, (115). Essentially, what Shakespearian historians have to work with are dates that the first
play was produced, and a methodical science of comparisons: full lines, split lines, unsplit lines
with pauses etc. The study of these works, along with other historical data, can present a rather
With such a methodology in place, it can be determined that the bulk of Shakespeares
tragedies, with the exception of a few in his early career, took place after August 9th, 1596. The
significance of this reveals that perhaps Shakespeares delve into the human psyche took place
after his own real-life tragedy. On August 9th, 1596, Shakespeares 11 year old son, Hamnet, died.
The emotional turmoil a parent might face during or following the death of a child could
certainly be substantial enough to act as a catalyst into a new psychological state of mind. Its
understandable that Shakespeare may have used this new, maddening perspective to achieve
some of his most famous tragedies. Peter Ackroyd, an award-winning biographer, asserts that, It
is impossible to gauge the effect upon the dramatistHe may have sought refuge, as so many
others have done, in hard and relentless work. The plays of this period have nevertheless been
interpreted in the light of his dead son. One critic has described Romeo and Juliet as a dirge for
the sons death (Kristeva 9); this stretches chronology, if not credulity. (288).
Griffith 4
One of Shakespeares most prominent tragedies, Macbeth, was written during this post-
child-loss phase. Macbeth, written in 1606, explores a different side of mental illness. Similar to
Hamlet, a new idea is fashioned, and the inner workings of the human mind are poked and
prodded, revealing new psychological depths. When Macbeth is contrasted to the likes of Iago or
Edmund, one may not pick up the subtle differences in psyche. All three characters are generally
thought of as antagonists, adding to the drama, and ultimately, catastrophic deaths of the
dramatic piece. However, as one begins to expand upon the beginnings of the madness of these
characters, stark contrasts can be drawn. Whereas Iago and Edmund are inherently evil, Macbeth
is not. Iago, for example, is introduced in Othello and immediately descends into a scheming
traitor as only, one can assume, his character could allow him: I follow [Othello] to serve my
turn upon him. / We cannot all be masters, nor all masters / Cannot be truly followed. (Othello
45-47). The reader never sees any traces of empathy, compassion or understanding in Iago.
Similarly, Edmund of King Lear begins the play innocent enough, only to expose his dastardly
and corrupt plans when he is left to himself, spinning a web of deceit, in a revealing soliloquy:
As to th legitimate. [...]
Macbeth, however, shows adamant disapproval, fear, anxiety, sympathy and regret before his
descent into a usurping tyrant. At the urging of his wife to kill King Duncan, Macbeth replies,
Griffith 5
As evidenced by his retort to Lady Macbeth, this newly appointed Thane of Cawdor has no
interest in manipulating fate, as prophesied by the Weird Sisters. King Lear and Othello focus on
the antagonist as someone with an inhuman ability to distance themselves from the very
emotions and reactions that make us human, whereas Macbeth focuses more narrowly on the
psychology of evil and how ambition corrupts one man and his wife (Greenwood 269).
antagonists, one can piece together Shakespeares thought processes on human psychology, and
how his beliefs had a profound impact on the development and portrayal of his characters.
changes, integral to the plot of the story. One might view Macbeth as an experiment of sorts. His
evolution from a hero of King Duncans court to a loathed tyrant of Scotland explores the deep
would call a conscience. He is plagued with the weaknesses of the human antagonist: morality,
ethics, and code of conduct. After he painfully and hesitantly decides to commit his first act of
murder, the reader begins to see his mind slip away from him. Quickly, he begins to enter a
pseudo-schizophrenic state. Before the act is even committed, Macbeth enters a full-blown
hallucinatory condition. These visions, even before the murder of Duncan has taken place, are
Griffith 6
potentially foreshadowing the steep downward spiral Macbeth enters psychologically after the
murders and deaths by his hand begin. After harsh words from Lady Macbeth, one might assume
his machismo overcomes his cowardice in an attempt to satiate his wifes desires. Regardless
of the major factor that propelled Macbeth to begin his string of murders, it is evident that his
It is not long after the murder of King Duncan, framed to appear committed by Duncans
own guards, whom Macbeth then slays in revenge for the king, that Banquo begins to suspect
that Macbeth may have had a hand in Duncans undoing. Considering Macbeths unraveling state
of mentality, it is not long before he has ordered Banquo and his son, Fleance, to be killed as
well. After Banquos murder has taken place, the ghost of Banquo haunts Macbeth. Banquos
ghost, perhaps mocking Macbeth and paying homage to the prophecy of the Weird Sisters, takes
the seat of King Macbeth. In front of his guests, Macbeths mental state, once again, begins to
unravel: Which of you have done this? /Thou canst not say I did it. Never shake/ Thy gory
locks at me (Macbeth 59, 61-62). Here, Macbeths fears and anxieties begin to manifest
Griffith 7
themselves in the form of hallucinations. Colin McGuinn, the author of Discovering the
guilt expresses itself in the form of unwanted imaginings. That is psychologically astute
on Shakespeares part: for some reason, a guilty conscience does manifest itself in just
this wayWhen we are afraid of something we are prone to imagine it. Everything from
anxiety dreams to a phobia of heights bears this outSo we imagine what we are afraid
Perhaps Macbeths mind was in a sort of limbo: caught between his resolute moral code and his
ravenous drive for power. The sheer act of Banquos ghost taking the seat of King Macbeth
illustrates to the reader that Macbeths mind is caught up in insecurities. His fear of being
overthrown, coupled with the anxiety of being discovered as the murderer, leads to his
imagination running wild. As McGuinn suggested, the sheer fear and shock that Macbeth could
be undone is wildly rampant in his own mind. His guilty conscience slowly chips away at his
sanity.
As we have discovered, antagonists such as Edmund and Iago were never presented with
much of a conscience. They are inherently evil by nature. For them, we never saw mental highs
and lows, only occupational and physical undoings. This is possibly why Macbeth is so
compelling. Audiences and readers can relate to Macbeth, while not necessarily entirely, at least
on some level. Macbeth was once a kind, trustworthy man that gave way to a monstrous dictator
As Macbeth progresses further and further into a state of mental decline, the thought of
committing murders becomes easier for him. The murder of Macduffs family was as casual as a
In this scene, the idea of slaughtering a family does not sit heavily upon Macbeths conscience
the way the murders of King Duncan and Banquo did. It becomes increasingly evident with each
act of murder that Shakespeare was exploring the loss of the human soul. Macbeth was losing a
piece of what made him human, unlike Iago and Edmund: his soul. With each act committed,
William Shakespeare was not only a pioneer of the English language, but one of the
human mind. His journey into unfathomable pain and loss, coupled with his unrivaled ability to
move the human spirit with words, was the perfect medium with which to paint his story and his
exploration of human psychology. Macbeth is often coined, the easiest Shakespeare drama, but
this is a huge disservice to Shakespeare. At surface level, the plot is easy, the drama is
straightforward, and it is obviously quite short. However, what Macbeth lacks in length it makes
up for in depth. A short swim in the pages of Macbeth will reveal little to you about the
autonomous human soul. However, a deep submerge into the storyline will reveal the layers of
human psyche that were not so intricately and delicately understood in an age where the mentally
ill were tortured rather than treated. Macbeth lacks no substance. It is profound and relatable.
Griffith 9
Shakespeare truly aimed to capture the entire essence of the human experience in one drama, and
did so swimmingly.
Griffith 10
Works Cited
Ackroyd, Peter. Shakespeare: The Biography. Great Britain: Chatto & Windus. 2005. 287-289.
Print.
Andrews, Jonathan. Bedlam Revisited: A History of Bethlem Hospital c.1634 c.1770. London:
Queen Mary and Westfield College, London University; 1991. Web. 01 Apr 2017.
Barroll, J. Leeds. The Chronology of Shakespeares Jacobean Plays and the Dating of Antony
and Cleopatra. 1965. Essays on Shakespeare. Ed. Gordon Ross Smith. University Park:
Kristeva, Julia. Tales of Love. Ed. L.S. Roudiez. New York, 1987. 9. Print
McGinn, Colin. Macbeth. Shakespeares Philosophy. New York: Harper Collins. 2006. 90-108.
Print.
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Ed. Barbara A. Mowat. New York: Washington Square Press.
1992. Print
Shakespeare, William. King Lear. Ed. Barbara A. Mowat. New York: Washington Square Press.
1993. Print.
Shakespeare, William. Macbeth. Ed. Barbara A. Mowat. New York: Washington Square Press.
1992. Print.
Shakespeare, William. Othello. Ed. Barbara A. Mowat. New York: Washington Square Press.
1993. Print.