Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
F01 (C)
IssueNo.04 Rev. No 4 Dated: Jan 7, 2017
COURSE PLAN
Approved By
_______________________ _______________________
HOD Dean
A. OBJECTIVES:
This Course has been designed to acquaint the student with the systematic and
methodological development of Courts, legislature and legal profession. The
knowledge of these institutions is imperatively significant in order to understand
pre and post- colonial nature of Courts, Legislature and legal profession of India.
The course curriculum is specifically designed as an UG course that is more
rigorous, experiential, investigative and/or accelerated than a standard course.
History course is designed to provide students with the analytic skills and factual
knowledge necessary to deal critically with the problems of present day legal
system.
Students should learn to assess historical materialstheir relevance to a given
interpretive problem, reliability, and importanceand to weigh the evidence and
interpretations presented in historical reasoning.
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
The history curriculum is specifically designed to provide the following learning goals
and outcomes:
Outcome #1
Demonstrate knowledge of key historical facts, values, and legal institutions that have
shaped Indian legal history.
Indicators of Achievement - Graduates will be able to:
Identify major developments in the history of legal institutions and law.
Demonstrate comprehension of basic historical legal developments in Indian scenario.
Demonstrate understanding of connections between historical events, ideas and
development of law and legal institutions over time.
Outcome #2
Analyze secondary sources and identify various approaches to historical interpretation
through critical reading.
Indicators of Achievement - Graduates will recognize the interpretive nature of history
by:
Demonstrating the ability to read a secondary source to understand an authors basic
argument.
Demonstrating the ability to explain an authors approach to a topic and its connection to
primary sources used.
The instructor requires students to read and/or interact to a wide spectrum of more
challenging,
thought provoking, relevant instructional materials including, but not limited to multiple
texts,
The instructor encourages students to take greater responsibility and increase self-
direction in their own learning.
The instructor includes opportunities for a variety of activities, such as panels, debates,
The instructor provides multiple opportunities for real world and experiential learning
opportunities.
The instructor requires students to develop and defend a position on historical issues.
D.PEDAGOGY
Needless to say high level of participation is needed from the side of the students to make
the subject interesting and enjoyable. Finding resources for history plans, activities,
projects, games, and quizzes that use technology and exploring inquiry-based lessons,
activities, and projects, that require efforts on the part of faculty, is also structured in the
manner that will be helping the students. Learning about new and emerging technologies
such as blogs, podcasts, wikis, ipods, and online social networks and exploring
innovative ways of integrating them into the curriculum will also help students.
Interactive approach during the study. (Students shall be advised in advance to prepare
the topics for discussion in the class)
Out of these various components teacher could take assistance for evaluating the students
Presentations (Individual/Group)
Project(Individual/ Group)
Viva
Class Test
Quiz
Multiple choice Questions
Socratic seminar
Document based Essay Questions (DBQ)
Free Response Questions
Assignments
Group Discussion
Movie Review
Book Review
Audio visual
Videos Clips- Youtube and other matters relating to the subject
Introducing a new book {this pre-reading activity is an effective way to introduce
students to a new book from a work of literature to a historical resource book,
such as Facing History and Ourselves: Holocaust and Human Behavior.
Spending some time looking at the content of a book can spark students interest
and can provide students with context that will help them engage with the
material}
Anticipation guides {Anticipation guides ask students to express an opinion
about ideas before they encounter them in a text or unit of study. Completing
anticipation guides prepares students to recognize and connect to these themes as
they surface in their learning. Reviewing anticipation guides at the end of a
lesson or unit is one way to help students reflect on how learning new material
may have influenced their opinions, perhaps by reinforcing previously held
beliefs or by causing ideas to shift}
Alphabet brainstorm: {Brainstorming is an effective way to help students get
ideas from head to paper. The Alphabet Brainstorm helps structure students
brainstorming by asking them to generate an idea that begins with each letter of
the alphabet. This can be done as an individual, small group, or whole class
activity. It is a quick way to generate thoughts, measure prior knowledge, and
evaluate learning.}
Document Analysis Templates: {Analyzing historical documents requires
students to identify the purpose, message and audience of a text. Document
Analysis Forms are graphic organizers that guide students through a process of
identifying important background information about a document (e.g.
author/creator, date created, place, format, etc.) and using this data to determine
the bias or perspective of a text.}
Four components will be used for internal assessment for this course (Total 100
marks), the details of each component is as follows:
a) Home Assignment:
Assignment will be given on the pattern of End Term Examination and it must be
hand written, to submit/present on a definite date. The assignment should be
attached with the course plan as Annexure-1 It will have 20% weightage.
Individual Viva-voce will be conducted on the assignment.
b) Projects/Presentations/Paper Review/Case Analysis/Write-up/Paper
Publication/Moot Court Participation/Court Room exercise: Weightage 20 %
Faculty has choice to select any one component:
a. Project Topics covering entire syllabus and emerging areas withallotments.
b.The case analysis should be an individual work.
c) Every Group would be asked to prepare a topic from the suggested
Mid- Sem examination shall be of two hour duration and shall be a combination of
Objective, short theory questions and numerical problems.
End-Sem examination shall be of three hours duration. The examination paper shall
have objective & theory questions, short and long numerical problems.
Student has to secure minimum 40% marks of the highest marks in the
class scored by a student in that subject (in that class/group class)
individually in both the End-Semester examination and Total Marks in
order to pass in that paper.
Attendance
Students are required to have minimum attendance of 75% in each subject. Students with
less than said percentage shall NOT be allowed to appear in the end semester
examination. The student obtaining 100% attendance would be given 5% bonus marks
for internal assessment.
Cell Phones and other Electronic Communication Devices: Cell phones and other
electronic communication devices (such as Blackberries/Laptops) are not permitted
in classes during Tests or the Mid/Final Examination. Such devices MUST be turned
off in the class room.
E-Mail and LMS: Each student in the class should have an e-mail id and a pass word
to access the LMS system regularly. Regularly, important information Date of
conducting class tests, guest lectures, syndicate sessions etc. to the class will be
transmitted via e-mail/LMS. The best way to arrange meetings with us or ask specific
questions is by email and prior appointment. All the assignments preferably should
be uploaded on LMS. Various research papers/reference material will be
mailed/uploaded on LMS time to time.
Each lecture should also mention a particular land mark Indian/foreign case with citation
Administration of PPT
Justice in Presidency Presentatio
http://www.gbv.de/dms/sbb-berlin/350624666.pdf
3. Towns Settlements: n
V. D. Kulashreshth Constitutional history of India
Madras. Reflections
Examples
Whiteboard
Administration of Examples
Justice in Presidency http://www.gbv.de/dms/sbb-berlin/350624666.pdf Discussion
4.
Towns Settlements: V. D. Kulashreshth Constitutional history of India Presentation
Bombay Random
Questions
Whiteboard
Examples
Courts: Mayors Court Discussion
8. http://www.gbv.de/dms/sbb-berlin/350624666.pdf
of 1726 Presentation
Random
Questions
Whiteboard
Examples
Courts: Mayors Court Discussion
9. http://www.gbv.de/dms/sbb-berlin/350624666.pdf
of 1753 Presentation
Random
Questions
Whiteboard
Examples
Discussion
10. Regulating Act of 1773 http://www.gbv.de/dms/sbb-berlin/350624666.pdf Presentation
Random
Questions
Whiteboard
Examples
Supreme Court http://www.gbv.de/dms/sbb-berlin/350624666.pdf Discussion
11.
Act of 1774 V. D. Kulashreshth Constitutional history of India Presentation
Random
Questions
Whiteboard
Examples
Pitts India Act, http://www.gbv.de/dms/sbb-berlin/350624666.pdf Discussion
12.
1784 V. D. Kulashreshth Constitutional history of India Presentation
Random
Questions
Whiteboard
Examples
the Act of Settlement http://www.gbv.de/dms/sbb-berlin/350624666.pdf Discussion
13.
1781. V. D. Kulashreshth Constitutional history of India Presentation
Random
Questions
Judicial system of Indiahttp://www.allahabadhig Whiteboard
Examples
Conflict: Raja Nand hcourt.in/event/TheIndianJudicialSystem_ Discussion
14.
Kumar, Presentation
SSDhavan.pdf Random
Questions
Whiteboard
Judicial system of Indiahttp://www.allahabadhig Examples
Discussion
hcourt.in/event/TheIndianJudicialSystem_
17. Conflict:Cossijurah. Presentation
Random
SSDhavan.pdf
Questions
Judicial Reforms : 1.
Complete Indian Legal History from year Whiteboard
Warren Hastings:
1600 to 1935 Part 1 to last ... Examples
Judicial Plans of
realityviews.blogspot.com/.../complete-indian- Discussion
1772, 1774 and
19 Presentation
1780.
legal-history-from-year.html... Random
Questions
21. Lord William 3. Complete Indian Legal History from year Whiteboard
Bentinck (With 1600 to 1935 Part 1 to last ... Examples
special focus on realityviews.blogspot.com/.../complete-indian- Discussion
Appraisal of Presentation
Criminal law) legal-history-from-year.html... Random
Questions
College of Legal Studies Jan.-June. 2017
Elizabeth Kolsky, "Codification and the Rule of
Colonial
legal-history-from-year.html...
Whiteboard
Elizabeth Kolsky, "Codification and the Rule of Examples
Judicial Reforms Discussion
Colonial
22. 1835-1858. Presentation
Random
Difference: Criminal Procedure in British India,"
Questions
and Kunal M. Parker, "The Historiography of
Difference,
Whiteboard
Indian Law enforcement history
Examples
Discussion
http://www.tribal-
24. Privy Council Presentation
institute.org/download/Indian%20Law%20Enforcemen
Random
t
Questions
%20History.pdf
25. Federal Court Indian Law enforcement history Whiteboard
College of Legal Studies Jan.-June. 2017
Examples
http://www.tribal- Discussion
institute.org/download/Indian%20Law%20Enforcemen Presentation
t Random
%20History.pdf Questions
Evolution of Judiciary.
http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/supct/scm/m2.pdf
Complete Indian Legal History from year 1600 to
5. 1935 Part 1 to last ... Whiteboard
realityviews.blogspot.com/.../complete-indian-legal- Examples
history-from-year.html... Discussion
26 Supreme Court
Presentation
Brief Amici Curae of Legal Historians submitted Random
in support of the petitioners in the U.S. Supreme Questions
Court case of ShafiqRasul, et al., Petitioners v.\
George Bush, et al., Respondents, available online at:
http://www.law.uc.edu/archives/butlerdata/liberty/gitmo/
legalhistorians.pdf
http://www1.nls.ac.in/ojs-2.2.3/index.php/slr/article/
viewFile
JUSTICE IN HER INFINITE VARIETY
Whiteboard
Mithi Mukherjee, India in the Shadows of the
Examples
Discussion
Empire: A Legal and Political History 1774
28. Hindu personal Law Presentation
Random
1950 (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2010)
Questions
http://www1.nls.ac.in/ojs-2.2.3/index.php/slr
/article/viewFile
29. Muslim JUSTICE IN HER INFINITE VARIETY Whiteboard
Personal Law Examples
Mithi Mukherjee, India in the Shadows of the Discussion
Presentation
Empire: A Legal and Political History 1774 Random
Questions
1950 (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2010)
Movie review
Whiteboard
History of Bar of India Examples
Legal Practitioners Discussion
33. Act 1853. http://www.barcouncilofindia.org/about/ Presentation
about-the-legal-profession/legal-education- Random
in-the-united-kingdom/ Questions
Project submission
1. Recorders Court.
2. Trial of Nanda Kumar.
3. Patna Case.
4. Criminal Judicature and Cornwallis.
5. Sir John Shore.
6. Lord Hastings and Arbitration in land disputes.
7. Racial discrimination in judicial system.
8. Village Panchayat courts.
9. Lokadalats.
10. High courts.
11. Privy Councils jurisdiction.
12. Federal court.
13. Development of criminal law.
14. Development of civil law.
15. Codification of laws.
16. Indian Penal Code, 1860.
17. Indian Succession Act, 1865.
18. Indian Contract Act, 1872.
19. Sale of Goods Act, 1930.
20. Partnership Act, 1932.
21. Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
22. Specific relief Act, 1963.
23. Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
24. Easement Act, 1882.
25. Civil Procedure Code, 1859.
26. Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
27. Criminal Procedure Code.
28. Right to Information Act, 2005.
29. Law Commissions in India.
30. Need for Law Reforms.
31. Personal Laws.
32. Amendments to the Constitution.
33. Rule of Law and Judicial Activism.
34. Doctrine of Promissory Estoppels.
35. Article 370 and Kashmir issue.
College of Legal Studies Jan.-June. 2017
36. Indian bar Councils Act, 1926.
37. Advocates Act, 1961.
38. Code of Ethics for High Court judges and judges of Supreme Court.
39. Law Reporting in India.
40. Legal Education.
Kindly select your topic and inform the subject teacher. Failing to register with
the undersigned would mean that you have not selected the topic.
Nilaya Mishra
1. Jstor
2. Westlaw
3. http://www.youtube.com
4. http://www.bbc.co.uk.indianhistory
5. Law and History Review
6. The Western Historical Quarterly
7. Journal of World History
8. World History Connected
1) Elizabeth Kolsky, A Note on the Study of Indian Legal History Law and
History Review 23 (2005)
2) Elizabeth Kolsky, "Codification and the Rule of Colonial Difference: Criminal
Procedure in British India," and Kunal M. Parker, "The Historiography of
Difference, Law and History Review 23 (2005).
3) Bernard S. Cohn, Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India
(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996) and Nicholas B. Dirks, Castes of
Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India (Princeton: Princeton
University Press, 2001).
4) Partha Chatterjee, Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative
Discourse (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993) and RanajitGuha,
ed., Writings on South Asian History and Society, Subaltern Studies 3 (Delhi:
Oxford University Press, 1994).
5) Eric Stokes, The English Utilitarians and India (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959)
and Uday Singh Mehta, Liberalism and Empire: A Study in Nineteenth-Century
British Liberal Thought (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).
6) Brief Amici Curae of Legal Historians submitted in support of the petitioners in
the U.S. Supreme Court case of ShafiqRasul, et al., Petitioners v. George Bush,
et al., Respondents, available online at:
http://www.law.uc.edu/archives/butlerdata/liberty/gitmo/legalhistorians.pdf
7) Lisa Hajjar, "Torture and the Future," Interventions: A Middle East Report
Online Feature (http://www.merip.org/mero/interventions/hajjar_interv.html).
8) Letter No. 44 (1834) from the Court of Directors to the Government of India in
NAI, Home (Public).
College of Legal Studies Jan.-June. 2017
9) Scott Michaelson and Scott Cutler Shershow, "The Guantanamo 'Black Hole':
The Law of War 'and the Sovereign Exception,'" January 12, 2004
(http://usa.mediamonitors.net/layout/set/print/content/view/full/3849).
H. Instructions
a) Students need to submit individual project and then make a presentation (max. 7
minutes)
(Details would be given along with project topics)
b) All students will be divided in groups comprising 10 students in each group and
given a relevant topic. Each group is expected to write a synopsis, carry out the
entire research process and then submit the research report and present the same.
c) Viva-voce would be conducted for those groups for the research project, if
adequate time for presentations is not there.
d) Students are expected to read the concerned sessions contents in advance before
coming to the class.
e) The session will be made interactive through active participation from students.
The entire session will be conducted through question-answer, reflections,
discussion, current practices, examples, problem solving activities and
presentations etc.
f) In the case study session all students are expected to prepare their analysis and
answers/decisions in their respective groups. Any group may be asked to present
their views and defend the same.
g) All schedules/announcements must be strictly adhered to.
h) The complete syllabus would be covered for Viva-voce and one must be
thoroughly prepared to appear for the viva and strictly appear on given time,
otherwise, he/she will loose the marks.
i) Late entry(Max. 5 minutes from the class timing) in the class will not be allowed.
j) The instructor requires students to read and/or interact to a wide spectrum of
more challenging, thought provoking, relevant instructional materials including,
but not limited to multiple texts, primary sources and multimedia.
q) The instructor provides multiple opportunities for real world and experiential
learning opportunities.
Annexure-I
SEMESTER II
SESSION: JAN-JUN
ASSIGNMENT FIRST
FOR
(LLBG)
NAME: _______________________
Section A
1. Elucidate upon the provisions of the High Courts Act of 1911.(3 marks)
2. Evaluate the importance of Lex Loci report passed by first law commission.(3
marks)
3. Compare the provisions of Legal Practitioners Act of 1846 with that of Legal
Practitioners Act 1879.(4 marks)
Section B
Section C
The Supreme Council i.e., Governor General and members of the Council clashed
with the Supreme Court once again in 1779 over the issue of latters jurisdiction over
the zamindars who were engaged in revenue collection for the company and whether
a writ could be issued by the Supreme Court against them. This controversy arose in
the historic Cossijurah Case.
1. Critically evaluate the facts and the outcome of this above mentioned
case.(10 marks)
2. Discuss the Act of Settlement and how this case was responsible for its
passing.(10 marks)
Section D
3. Critically analyze the evolution of High Courts in India. Also discuss the
jurisdiction and constitution of High Courts as given in High Courts Act of 1861.
4. Evaluate the efforts of Lord Minto and Lord Morley in the development of
Legislative institutions in India in the light of the Indian Councils Act of 1909.
5. Discuss the power, jurisdiction and contribution of Federal Court in the legal
history of India.
ON ASSIGNMENT SOLVING
3. Please remember that due to the dynamic and rapidly changing global legal
environment and the continuously realigning geopolitical situation, your answers
should capture and depict the current contemporary information.
Annexure-II
2. Submission of synopsis
Synopsis should contain the following:
a. Statement of the Problem
b. Survey of the existing literature
c. Identification of the issues
d. Objective and scope of the research
e. Research Methodology adopted
f. Probable outcome
g. Chapterization
5. The student shall indicate clearly and extensively in his/her project, the
following:
a. The source from which referred information is taken;
b. The extent to which he/she has availed himself/herself of the work of others
and the portion of the /project work he/she claims to be his/her original work;
and
c. Whether his/her project work has been conducted independently or in
collaboration with others.
7. All projects submitted by the students will go through the process of plagiarism
check through the anti-plagiarism software (Ternitin). The report produced by the
software will necessarily be as per the standards prescribed by the university. If
the report is below standards the supervisor will reject the project and award zero
marks.