Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CONTEMPORARY READINGS IN
THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF LAW
BOGDAN DAVID
bogdan.david@dccu.ro
Dimitrie Cantemir Christian University
1. Introduction
The US benefits from running persistent trade deficits as a result of its special
position in the international system, and from being the most dominant
power today, continuing to be the greatest power for the foreseeable future,
and using the threat of exclusion to advantage under various configurations of
power. The US alternates between an optimal tariff strategy and a strategy
of limit pricing, attracts a lot of investment by offering equity in return, is
209
able to benefit from policies that would be disastrous for other countries, and
has attracted an enormous share of world capital (the US position in the
monetary domain has produced commercial advantages). There are risks
involved with continuous deficits, which the US faces. The current world
system has built-in stabilizers that strengthen American power following
bouts of decline.1 There is no other great power to replace the United States
as a hegemon. The United States represents a hybrid between the notion of
hegemony and empire. Hegemonic global capitalism and American hegemony
are the mirrored reflection of one other. The promise of a more integrated
world is coming into being to replace Americas global hegemony. 2 The
United States prefers the resulting asymmetric distribution of market power
over self-sufficiency, avoiding gains in technology and reductions in price
while extending the global production of weapons.3
Chinas economic growth rate will decrease in the coming decades. Life
expectancy has been rising rapidly. Most Chinese cease working before or
in the years soon after they reach age 60. Population aging is not likely to
cause significant problems for Chinas economic growth. Much of the urban
Chinese population does not have pension coverage. The culture of mutual
support among family members remains central in China. Men are more fully
involved in the employed workforce than women.4 Increasing urban land use
efficiency is a policy priority of the Chinese government. Logistics costs
could be lowered through more efficient urban form.5 China has become the
workshop or factory of the world through the expansion of manufacturing
production. The sustainability of the current pattern of economic expansion
in China is based on a high export-high accumulation model. The Chinese
growth pattern generates more productive and remunerative employment
outside agriculture.6 Urban poverty in China emerged during the transition
from central planning to market economy. Labor migrants in China are not
landless people.7
China is facing a new urban poverty, experiencing peak labor supply. The
withdrawal of social welfare provision and exclusion from regular employ-
ment is an important factor in Chinese cities. Poverty concentration is closely
associated with state-led urban development policies.8 The EU and its member-
states have helped China make its economy greener and more energy efficient.
Chinas rulers could try to force local authorities to enforce environmental
laws and energy efficiency targets. There is no more important single issue
in EU-China relations than climate change. The Europeans should show their
willingness to support serious reforms of international financial institutions,
using their dialogue with the Chinese on global governance to bring China
closer to existing economic institutions (multilateralism can serve Chinas
interests at the global level). The EU and China should convince the worlds
other powers to maintain an open global system.9 The 21st century is touted
210
to be the Asian age, belonging to China and India. Indias economic modern-
ization and liberalization program is proceeding slowly. India seeks to
articulate its national interest but to speak for development issues, targeting
states that will bring it specific and tangible security, political and economic
benefits. Indias foreign policy demonstrates an increasing tempering of ideal-
ism with pragmatism, showing a mix of balancing and hedging of interests.10
Individuals have been able to help identify their own particular training needs
through the completion of individual training and development plans. Im-
proving quality and consistency, and complying with occupational health and
safety and environment standards, are part of sound business practice. The
evaluation of training is often based on feedback from trainees, employees,
line managers and customers.21 Our knowledge on the interactions between
formal education and employer-provided training is still weak. The supply
of training (by employers) shows no variation with the educational level of
employees. Employees who are perceived to have a high probability of
leaving the company are less likely to receive employer-provided training.
The reported wage returns on training highlight only average effects.22 Train-
ing programs cannot be expected to provide a bridge over all performance
gaps. Trainers and HRD practitioners play an important role in national
workforce development. The time frame for interventions is a longer term
than a one-shot training event.23 Funding for training mostly resides locally
with individual businesses. Training must be purposeful to help corporations
achieving their business goals. E-learning training is judged on the basis of
relevance, rather than class hours. E-learning is an essential component of a
corporate training program to help corporations achieve their strategic goals
and competitive advantage. Classroom training offers a familiar and com-
fortable method that learners are used to. Standardization is the ability to
train people in different countries with different languages in a quick, cost
effective, and consistent manner.24
212
5. Conclusions
REFERENCES
213
Evidence, Gaps and the Way Forward, Journal of Integrated Disaster Risk Man-
agement 1(1): 11.
15. Quinto, Cornel (2011), Insurance Systems in Times of Climate Change
Insurance of Buildings against Natural Hazards. Heidelberg-Dordrecht-London-
New York: Springer, 2526.
16. Faure, Michael, and Vronique Bruggeman (2008), Catastrophic Risks and
First-Party Insurance, Connecticut Insurance Law Journal 15(1): 1132.
17. Botzen, W. J. W., and J. C. J. M. van den Bergh (2008), Insurance against
Climate Change and Flooding in the Netherlands: Present, Future, and Comparison
with Other Countries, Risk Analysis 28(2): 414.
18. Hecht, Sean B. (2008), Climate Change and the Transformation of Risk:
Insurance Matters, UCLA Law Review 55: 15641602.
19. Ocampo, J. A. (2008), Capital Market Liberalization and Development, in
Ocampo, J. A. and Stiglitz, J. E. (eds.), Capital Market Liberalization and Develop-
ment. New York: Oxford University Press, 147.
20. Tabatoni, P., and Barblan, A. (2010), Strategic Management, a Tool of
Leadership Concepts and Paradoxes, in Tabatoni, P. et al. (eds.), Strategic Man-
agement and Universities Institutional Development, EUA Genve, 511.
21. Dawe, S. (2002), Evaluating Training and Learning Practices in Large
Australian Firms, paper presented at the Australasian Evaluation Society Inter-
national Conference, Wollongong, October/November.
22. Asplund, R. (2005), The Provision and Effects of Company Training,
Nordic Journal of Political Economy 31: 4773.
23. Rothwell, W. J. et al. (2003), What CEOs Expect from Corporate Training.
New York: AMACOM, 15248.
24. Tai, L. (2008), Corporate E-Learning. An inside View of IBMs Solutions.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Bogdan David
214
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without
permission.