Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
26 April 2017
Throughout the past several hundred years in Western culture, especially since the
beginning of the Cold War, the term ideology has been used to describe the principles,
lifestyle and actions of an individual within a given society. Guided by cultural and
domestic influences, as well as the state into which they emerged, ideology determines
for a person who they are and how they operate within society, regardless of whether or
Marxist French philosopher Louis Althusser even went so far in his criticisms of
ideology as to assert that ones ideology is determined for them before they are even born
influences, both societal and domestic, determine a persons ideology even before
identities are formed and how those without power are subsequently Othered. The
influences can easily be found in the ethnocritical studies where critical theorists explore
the ways in which various texts have portrayed non-white as uncivilized or savages, and
aforementioned ideas put forth by Louis Althusser, exploring them through a Marxist
lens, and connecting them to the critical analyses of ethnocriticism via Toni Morrison,
Marxism
Marx during the 19th century. Jaded with the ways in which capitalism was directing the
course of the world, Marx adapted the Hegelian concept of the historical dialectica
theory stating that history has been the driving force of shaping people, nations and
economies. Marx asserts that it has instead been materialism and consumerism that were
the driving forces throughout history, and that rather than there being strictly a
master/slave complex existing amongst people, there is instead a binary shaped around
capital. He labelled the ruling class possessing capital and the means of production the
bourgeois, and insisted that the working-class, or the proletarians, were subjected to
working under the unruly conditions of this oppressive ruling class. Furthermore, Marx
stated that workers were alienated and dissatisfied with their unfair working conditions,
the result of which would eventually lead to the proletariat rising up and overcoming the
fruition and growing to represent a persons place in society, a later French Marxist
philosopher named Louis Althusser took a different approach to Marxs theory. Althusser
instead argued in his essay Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses that people, or
subjects, were represented by ideologies, i.e. the sets principles that represent who an
individual is and how they operate. He contends in his essay that people residing in a
state apparatus are born always-already subjects, meaning they are born subjected to
the ruling Subject, i.e. the state, with an ideology already assigned to their identity. He
used this concept always-already identity or subjectivity to explain how all aspects of a
persons life existing and growing up in a state apparatus shapes who they are, be that
societal, political or domestic, e.g. who a persons parents are and the ideology they
represent, the conditions of the state to which they are born into, the political apparatus
surrounding said state, and a myriad of others have the potential to influence a persons
ideology and will potentially condition the ways a person acts and operates in the society
which they reside. Further, Althusser theorizes that a persons continued existence within
their ideology is reinforced by the continuous material actions they partake ine.g. buying
guns for protection, biking rather than driving to deter greenhouse emissions, etc.of
Those Who Walk Away From Omelas. In it, Le Guin applies a pseudo-Marxist lens to a
fictionalized utopia where everything is pristine. In Omelas, however, the people who
reside there live with secret they all keep to themselvesa child viewed as abnormal
that they keep locked up beneath the city which by doing, keeps the land a pristine land
immune from anything but good. Le Guins story establishes an allegory for American
society and the ideologies it persists. Le Guin goes further by adding a scathing criticism
of the American dreaman ideology in itself printed onto the mental psyche of an
American a priori in an always-already fashion and implying that those who are
unable to cope with the horrifying compromise made to uphold their perfect lives
eventually walk away from Omelas (Le Guin). These dissenters are the equivalent of
Americans citizens waking up from the ideology of the American Dream and beginning
to realize the horrible confounds their perfect lives are built upon.
Ethnocriticism
analyze ethnocentric views that persist throughout the American canon. More
specifically, it looks at the how nations outside the scope of Western culture are viewed,
and how various ethnicities and cultures have been exotified, misconstrued, or pushed to
linguistic signs and signifiers and how they influence white European and/or Anglo-
other races, ethnicities and nationality outside of the West, as well as exploring the ways
in which white American culture they tends to Other. The notion of Othering various
non-white ethnicities and cultures makes them out to be subversive to white, European
signified racial, ethnic or cultural persona. In addition, the way one person/subject views
another person/subject based on how the latter operates in a given state apparatus is also
informed by their ideology. By extension, someone born African, i.e. on the continent
interpreter as an oppressor.
relation to the conglomeration of the numerous African culture and the inaccuracies of
the ideologies informing an Africanist view in her essay, Black Matters. In it,
through the guise of the western Canon has, Africanized black and/or African-
American individuals. Morrison argues that for centuries, the view of individuals born in
Africa have been portrayed as savages, uncivilized humans inferior in racial class than
Unlike Althusser, Morrison doesnt explicitly state that ideology as a whole is the
ultimate cause for this ethnocentric view, but more directly critiques the white liberalism.
The liberal ideology, especially in American Morrison argues, has a tendency to sweep
the notion of race and/or racial discourse aside. Those whose lives are dictated by
liberalism, however, are often unaware of its dominance over their thoughts and lives due
the American Dream (i.e. that anyone can achieve anything so long as they work at it;
that everyone is born with equal conditions). Therefore, rather than making any attempt
to correct their misconstrued views regarding race or ethnicity, subjects of the liberal
narcissistic attempt to rid those who fall under the liberal umbrella of any guilt pertaining
to the mistreatment of blacks and Africans throughout history and the furthered Othering
sexuality without focusing on the man/woman binary. The theory focuses on the
greyness of spectrums, not just in gender, but also in all facets of life. Destabilization
of norms and ideals; accepting that reality is only a fabrication; and the performativity of
gender are the major concentrations of queer theory. Queer theorists understand that
everyone is born into an always-already identified role of being, i.e. subjectivity, but that
that role is nothing more than a social construct of which we are initially bound, and from
Judith Butler explores these concepts of gender in her essay, Imitation and
Gender Insubordination. She determines that gender and sexuality are social constructs
defined by our culture. Essentially, we are born into a specific set of expectations
determined by the ideologies that dictate our gender and, by extension, our performance
in society. From the moment a baby is declared a male or a female in the womb or at
birth, they begin performing their gender in order to live up to the societal expectations of
Society has created ideal facets that establish and regulate the way men and
women are supposed to behave, from what we wear, to what we eat, and how we sit.
Butler argues that these gender roles are fictitious, and not biological as society and state
apparatuses would have us believe. Just because one is born female, for example, does
not mean that they are attracted to men, are feminine in any specific way, or even that
they are technically a woman at all. Gender is nothing but a cultural ideology coercing
subjects of the state to perform a certain way. Butler discusses that not only is gender a
To be able to continually reinforce and produce our self, Butler argues that
everyone must perform drag. There is no one right way to be a certain identified gender
or sexuality. Society, however, has instilled the notion that gender is like a script we run
through (Shmoop) and that script has already existed for quite some time and is
script, we must perform certain roles, ones that are ideologically assigned, and from
The ideological state of being concerning gender and sexuality falls into the
heteronormative-cisgender model. Butler argues that Western societies that are bleached
is the copy, the original being the accepted ideal and the base of all sexuality.
not inherently natural, as everything is, as Butler states, just a copy of a copy, for which
perform in order to fit these ideologies. When we refuse to perform the gender script we
disillusioned and ambiguous, exposing it is as a social construct, and in turn shattering its
image as an ideology.
In conclusion
ways in which ideology informs the subjects of the state apparatus; how ideology dictates
the way these subjects operate in society; and how these subjects are born into these
ideologies, growing up with its effects as an intrinsic aspect of their identity. He paves the
way for later theorists and literary authors like Toni Morrison and Judith Butler to each
utilize ideology in their own specific ways in order to discuss and critique their own
ideology). Morrison thoroughly explicates the ideology effects enacted upon both those
born in Africa and/or of an African descent by white Western culture. She in turn sheds
light on the repressive implications of these Western ideologies and how they negatively
impact the subjects of said Western states. Butler offers an elaborate exploration of the
inaccuracies of the gender binary, specifically towards those of a queer identity. She
exposes the detrimental effects that stem from such strict classifications, and instead
argues for increased exposure of the massive amount of liminal space present in the
gender spectrum. And while again these critical theories dont directly correlate in every
fashion, they do approach their issues in a number of the same ways, as seen here with
ideology.
Ideology is present in most every facet of society, especially in those that draw the
speculation of the various fields critical thinking. The focus of ideology is not limited to
any specific critical theory like Marxism; Althusser may have made ideology the focus of
his criticism earlier than Morrison or Butler, but that doesnt make him any more of a
sound guide for ideology than others. If anything, Althusser would potentially take from
Butler or Morrisons theories to help reinforce his own, or to possibly expand on his own
theories had he been around to engage in any type of healthy discourse. Unfortunately,
that isnt the case, and were left to piece together the numerous theories ourselves.
Work Cited
Butler, Judith. Imitation and Gender Insubordination. N.p.: n.p., 1991. 307-18. Print.
K., Le Guin Ursula. The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas. Hove, South Aust.: Townsend
Morrison, Toni. Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination. New York:
Patrick, Warren. "Playing With Gender: Judith Butler and Gender Performativity."
Shmoop Editorial Team. "Judith Butler." Shmoop. Shmoop University, 11 Nov. 2008. Web.
26 Apr. 2017.
Stevens, Anne H. "French Marxism." Literary Theory and Criticism: An Introduction.
Stevens, Anne H. "Gates and the African American Tradition." Literary Theory and
Print.
Stevens, Anne H. "Gates and the African American Tradition." Literary Theory and
Print.