General criteria for evaluation of
presentations and Project
Prof. Jan Fazlagi
Positive attributes:
Al members of the team are
equally involved
Creative examples
Reflexive approach to
knowledge,
Own research conducted for
the purpose of the project
Interaction with the audience
eg through a quiz, moderated
discussion
Students well prepared to
deliver an oral presentation
Students share the knowledge
about their own history and
country
Students try to introduce fun
element an humour
The audience is paying
attention
Well balanced content vs. fun
proportions
Presentation delivered on time,
no logistics problems
Typical grades:
5.0 Most or all of the above mentioned positive attributes are present
4.5 Most or all of the above mentioned positive attributes are present
but not enough creativity
4.0 Most above mentioned positive attributes are present, some
negative as well
Negative attributes:
One member of the team
dominating, disproportionate
contribution of one team member,
free-riding
Plain, non creative examples e.g.
Apple, Microsoft, Bill Gates etc.
Non-reflexive approach, copy-
paste
No own contribution
On-way communication
Students read their notes, cant
pronounce some English words
properly
Students use worn-out examples
from American and English
management literature
Students focus of facts and figures
not on the perception
The audience is not paying
attention (eating snack, checking
their e-ail or FB, talking with other
students, disconnected).
Too much focus on entertainment:
e.g. playing long YouTube vids
instead of presenting results of
ones own work
Presentation not delivered on time
or other logistic problems
3.5 Some of the above mentioned negative attributes are present but
not enough positive ones
3.0 Many of the above mentioned negative attributes are present but
not enough positive ones
2.0 Many or all of the above mentioned negative attributes are present
but no or too few positive ones