0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)

11 visualizzazioni10 pagine3-23 Failure Mechanism and Interpretation

Apr 26, 2017

© © All Rights Reserved

PDF, TXT o leggi online da Scribd

3-23 Failure Mechanism and Interpretation

© All Rights Reserved

0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)

11 visualizzazioni10 pagine3-23 Failure Mechanism and Interpretation

© All Rights Reserved

Sei sulla pagina 1di 10

P. Paniagua, A. Emdal & S. Nordal

Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

ABSTRACT: The application of the NTH interpretation model for cone penetration data in silts is evalu-

ated in view of experimental results regarding the study of the cone penetration test with x-ray micro to-

mography and 3D Digital Image Correlation. Both failure patterns, theoretical and experimental, are

compared and analyzed by Finite Element simulations to study the mechanism controlling the drainage

during penetration and its influence on the interpretation of results.

1 INTRODUCTION

Intermediate soils such as silts are believed to behave partially drained during cone penetration test

(CPT/CPTU) at the standard rate of 2.0 cm/sec (Lunne et al. 1997). Conventional interpretation methods

commonly based on fully drained or undrained conditions can be difficult to apply. Change in the penetra-

tion rate is suggested to modify drainage conditions around the advancing cone. By increasing the penetra-

tion rate fully undrained conditions will be approached, while decreasing the penetration rate sufficiently a

drained behavior may be expected. The application of this approach in silts is discussed by DeJong et al.

(2013). However, the challenge is to make a reliable interpretation of effective stress parameters (friction

angle and cohesion) from the partially drained CPTU.

Senneset et al. (1988) suggested the application of the NTH (Norwegian University of Science and

Technology, formerly Norwegian Institute of Technology) interpretation model (NTH-model) as interpre-

tation guideline for CPTU in silts. Mayne (2012) recommended the application of the NTH-model for

evaluation of effective stress friction angle.

The NTH-model is evaluated by Sandven (1990) and recently Bradshaw et al. (2012). Bradshaw et al.

(2012) state that the NTH-model makes use of the excess pore pressure during cone penetration in inter-

preting a friction angle; however, Sandven (1990) comments on the challenge related to what reference

pore pressure should be used in the model.

Paniagua et al. (2013) present an experimental campaign where x-ray micro tomography (x-ray micro

CT) and 3D Digital Image Correlation (3D-DIC) were combined for studying CPT in silt. A non-plastic

uniform dilative silt (Vassfjellet silt) with 94% of its grains smaller than 74 m smaller and a clay content

of 2.5% was used in the experiments. The samples were stepwise penetrated in 5 mm and 1 mm at a rate

of 6 mm/s. Penetration was stopped at defined intervals for x-ray micro CT scanning. The spatial defor-

mation was mapped and analyzed by applying 3D-DIC. The observation of the failure pattern during cone

penetration by x-ray micro CT and posterior analysis with 3D-DIC allowed the identification of a compac-

tion zone under the tip and a dilating zone below. Distinct zones of shear along the shaft, partly develop-

ing into tension cracks could be seen. These observations shed light on improving the understanding of the

drainage condition during penetration in silts.

957

In this paper, the NTH-model is reviewed and evaluated based on the information from Paniagua et al.

(2013a, b), taking into consideration pore pressure generation and drainage around the cone.

Lunne et al. (2007) state that for CPT interpretation in silty soils, the drainage conditions expected in the

design problem must be identified. If the design problem faces undrained conditions and the CPT data is

undrained, clay relationships can be used. On the other hand, if the design problem is drained and the re-

sults from CPT are drained then an interpretation method similar to sand can be applied. However, when

drained conditions dominate the design problem and the CPT is undrained or partially drained, effective

stress strength parameters are needed for design.

Senneset et al. (1988) recommended the application of the NTH-model (Senneset et al., 1982) for CPTU

data interpretation in silts. The method is based on limit plasticity theory for an effective stress analysis of

the bearing capacity of a cone (Equation 1); including the effects of excess pore pressures generated dur-

ing undrained or partially drained conditions. A plastification angle is proposed to account for the extent

of the plastified zone (Fig. 1).

where qn = Nm (vo + a) = net cone resistance with Nm = (Nq - 1) / (1 + Nu Bq) = cone resistance number;

vo is the effective overburden pressure; a = c / tan ' = the attraction term and c the cohesion; Nq = tan

(45 + /2) exp [(-2) tan] = bearing capacity factor depending on friction angle and plastification

angle ; and Bq = u/qn is a pore pressure ratio relating u = excess pore pressure around the cone to the

total stress increase in tip resistance.

Senneset et al. (1982) proposed the expression Nu 6 tan (1 + tan) to represent the effect of the ex-

cess pore pressures along the shear surface of the bearing capacity of the cone. Kirkeb (1986) presents a

more comprehensive solution (Appendix A) as a function of the friction angle and Janbus dilatancy

parameter D (Janbu 1985). D is defined under undrained triaxial shearing to be D = p/q where p is

the change in effective mean stresses and q is the change in deviatoric stresses, for the different zones 1

and 3 (Fig. 1). The main assumption for the pore pressures variation along the failure surface is uzone3 <

uzone1, where uzone3 is average excess pore pressure in zone 3 and uzone1 is average excess pore pressure

in zone 1. Sandven (1990) and Senneset et al. (1989) point out that the approximation for Nu gives

satisfactory values for = 17-35, which is a typical range of friction values for clays and silts, when the

parameters D1 = D3 = 0 are used in the Kirkeb (1986) solution.

Figure 2 shows diagrams of the variation of Nm depending on tan and Bq. They are derived following

the theoretical approach discussed in the previous section. Hence, the calculations of Nm (Equation 2) and

Bq (Equation 3) are used to find .

958

where qT is the corrected cone resistance, u2 is the pore pressure measured behind the cone shoulder (u2

position) and uo is the hydrostatic pore pressure. Senneset et al. (1988) propose -values for Norwegian

silts varying between -20 to -10 for overconsolidated silts silty sands, -5 to +5 for medium silts

(lightly overconsolidated), +10 to +20 for loose (normally overconsolidated) silts.

The attraction value, a, applied in Equation 2 can be obtained by theoretical interpretation methods

(Senneset & Janbu 1985) or by results from triaxial tests (Senneset et al. 1988). In the same reference, typ-

ical values of attraction varying from 0-30 kPa and friction angles from 27-35 are suggested for Norwe-

gian silts.

Examples of interpretation of effective shear strength parameters from CPTU using the NTH-model have

been published by Senneset et al. (1988) and Sandven (2003) for Stjrdal silt and Halsen silt, respectively

(both Norwegian silts). Good agreement between interpreted values from CPTU and triaxial tests are

found. Sandven (2003) points out that the NTH-model is based on homogeneous soil and ideal undrained

response during penetration; however, in most cases silty soils are inhomogeneous and they are expected

to behave in a partially drained manner.

Figure 2. Interpretation diagrams for (a) = 0; (b) = -15 and (c) = +15 (Senneset et al., 1989)

959

Long (2007) applied the NTH-model for interpretation of CPTU in estuarine Irish silts finding values

normally expected for loose silty material. Long et al. (2010) found consistent values with triaxial test re-

sults for friction angles in Os silt (Norwegian silt). Recently Bradshaw et al. (2012) applied the NTH-

model to Rhode Island silt and found good agreement with the laboratory data, especially in zones where

high positive excess pore pressures were generated, suggesting that the NTH-model accurately accounts

for the effects of pore pressure generation during penetration leading to more accurate estimates of . It

must be noted that in all these cases, the silty soil gave triaxial test results with a consistent dilative re-

sponse.

3.1 Background of experimental mechanics for penetration of objects in soil materials

Previous works have been published regarding the penetration of objects in sand (Robinsky & Morrison

1964, Muromachi 1974, Yasafuku & Hyde 1995, Broere 2001, White et al. 2002, Liu 2010) and clay (Roy

et al. 1974). Alternative materials like crushed glass (Allersma 1987) or transparent "clay" illuminated by

laser light (Gill & Lehane 2001, Ni et al. 2010, Liu & Iskander 2010) have also been used for this purpose.

Influence areas around the penetrating object have been identified in these works which have mainly been

in plane strain conditions. 3D penetration of objects in sand has been studied by x-ray tomography (Koba-

yashi & Fukagawa 2003, van Nes 2004, Ngan-Tillard et al. 2005, Morita et al. 2007, Kikuchi et al. 2010,

Paniagua et al. 2012) where changes in density around the penetrating object have been derived. Planar

Digital Image Correlation (2D-DIC) has been used in a test on a "half-model" built against a glass plate to

trace movements along a plane surface (Salgado 2013).

Figure 3. Failure pattern during CPT in terms of incremental volumetric strains (v) and incremental shear strains

(s) studied by x-ray micro CT and 3D-DIC, shown as a cut through the middle of the volume. (Paniagua et al.

2013b). (C = Compaction and D = Dilation)

Figure 4. Comparison between failure surface for the NTH interpretation model (Senneset et al., 1982) and the fail-

ure surface from 3D-DIC (Paniagua et al. 2013a, b)

960

3.2 Failure mechanism observed by Paniagua et al. (2013a, b)

Paniagua et al. (2013a, b) present laboratory scale cone penetration test with x-ray micro CT further ana-

lyzed with 3D-DIC. The Vassfjellet silt tested is a non-plastic uniform silt with highly dilatant behavior in

undrained conditions. Shear structures along the shaft were identified as well as two main bulb shaped

zones of incremental compaction and incremental dilation under and around the tip (Fig. 3).

Paniagua et al. (2013b) concluded that the laboratory observations from x-ray micro CT and 3D-DIC

shed light on observed field conditions for CPTU in silts. Taking the case of a saturated soil, water may

simply move locally from a compressive to a neighboring dilative zone creating a short drainage path.

This suggests that due to the closeness between compressive and a dilative zones, it might be necessary to

penetrate with an extremely high rate to obtain a purely undrained condition for CPTU in silts.

4.1 Relation between NTH-model and x-ray micro CT + 3D-DIC experimental results

This section looks closer into the NTH-model from the experimental mechanics point of view. The pur-

pose is to clarify the apparent successful application of the NTH-model for CPTU data in silts, even

though the dilative behavior of silts has not been taken into account in the model (it has been derived for

D = 0). Therefore, it is of interest to study the NTH-model when a more realistic approach which include

dilative behavior, observed by Paniagua et al. (2013a, b) and triaxial tests, is included.

Trying to fit both failure surfaces, as shown in Figure 4, one can roughly see that zone 1 falls in the

compaction zone (zoneC, in red), that zone 3 is in the dilation zone (zoneD, in blue) and that the failure

mechanism is limited by the shear strain zone. Taking this as a stationary condition where the coordinate

system is set at the tip and advances with the cone movement, the cone will advance continuously in a soil

volume at failure and continuously generate contractive and dilative zones. The main consequence of the

close distance between the contractive and the dilative zone is that a local internal drainage will occur.

The generation of excess of pore pressures when the cone advances (uzone3 < uzone1) (Senneset et al.

1982) and the conclusions from Paniagua et al. (2013b) regarding the drainage paths (uzoneD < uzoneC)

during CPTU in silty soils, might suggest that the amount of pore pressures recorded by the CPTU will

depend on the change of stress stages in the soil around the tip. The definition of Janbu (1985) for excess

of pore pressures u = p - Dq implies D = p'/q. If D > 0 the soil will behave dilatant and if D < 0 it

will behave contractive). p is the change in the total mean stress and q is the change in the deviatoric

stress; then the amount of pore pressures generated will be affected by the relation between p and q.

For the dilative silts in this study D > 0, causing this partial drainage.

In an infinitesimal increment and with partial drainage, a point in the failure zone 1 will experience

more p due to the push of the cone, while p will be lower in a point further away from the tip (zone 3),

in both cases compared to the q that it will experience. This is further discussed in Section 4.2, after pre-

senting numerical simulations for fully drained and undrained conditions.

Even though the solution from Senneset et al. (1982) is given for a D = 0 in both zones, the stationary

pore pressure generation at each penetration increment agrees with the experiments and conclusions from

Paniagua et al. (2013a, b) for silty soils.

To study the effect of including the D parameter in the NTH-model following the Kirkeb (1986) solu-

tion, new diagrams (Fig. 5) of Nm as function of tan and Bq are derived for a vertical loading case and

using D1 = D3 = 0.6 to account for a dilatant material. The new curves do not change dramatically com-

pared to the old ones. However, they are more conservative for tan values lower than 0.63-0.70 depend-

ing on the -angle. For the range of silt values variation of tan between 0.5-0.7, Nm between 5-30 and

Bq between 0-0.4 (Senneset et al. 1988); there is not much change from the previous condition without

dilatancy considerations (see the marked red area in Fig. 5). If the pore pressure ratio Bq increases, there is

more deviation from the previous derived curves. Ideally one may like that an interpretation model CPTU

data would fit the full range of soil materials, but this seems not to be possible due to particularities in

each soil.

961

Figure 5. New NTH interpretation diagrams for (a) = 0; (b) = -15 and (c) = +15, accounting for dilative soil

materials. Most silty soils fit into the area marked in red

Long et al. (2010) applied the NTH-model for Os silt. For = 0, Nm = 7.5 and Bq = 0.2, they found a tan

= 0.62 ( = 32). Introducing the same values in the new derived curves from Figure 5, tan = 0.65

( = 33); which does not show strong variations from the original result.

4.2 Stress state around the CPTU in a dilating silt: numerical approach

Numerical simulations of the cone penetration laboratory test from Paniagua et al. (2013a, b) were per-

formed with the Finite Element (FE) Method software Plaxis 2011.02 following the Press-Replace tech-

nique (Engin 2013). The axisymmetric model is shown in Figure 6 where 7076 15-noded elements are

used. The effective stress based Hardening Soil model (Schanz et al. 1999) is applied with material pa-

rameters calibrated to soil data of Vassfjellet silt (Appendix B) and to curves for penetration resistance

measured during the experiments (Fig. 6). The simulations were performed in drained and undrained con-

ditions.

Figure 7a shows the magnitude of incremental displacements (in a penetration increment of 0.5 cm) for

the penetration phase at a tip depth in the sample of 6 cm, for the cases of drained and undrained penetra-

tion. The failure surface proposed by Senneset et al. (1982) and the one observed by Paniagua et al.

(2013a, b) are superposed. Points in the failure surfaces were selected to study the relation between p

and q at the final increment (Fig. 7b).

Silva & Bolton (2005) state that soil failure during CPTU combines large physical displacement of soil

and fluid as well as shearing of soil along the piezocone shaft. In Figure 7a it is possible to observe that in

the undrained FE calculation, the soil displacements caused by the penetration influence a larger area than

the area influenced in the drained FE calculation. This coincides with the reasoning that due to less time

(or no time) for drainage during undrained penetration, the disturbed surrounding soil is greater and there-

fore, the induced excess pore pressures will be greater (Silva & Bolton 2005). Figure 7b agrees with this

since in undrained penetration the change in total mean stress (p) is higher than the change in deviatoric

stress (q ) which will give u > 0 (following Janbus definition). On the other hand, in a drained case (u

= 0) the disturbed zone around the cone is smaller.

962

In a partially drained condition we should expect a condition between these two extremes. If in addition

the soil is dilative (like the silt studied), the large strains from CPTU mobilize the dilatant tendency of the

silt and cause negative pore pressures as observed by Silva & Bolton (2005). The effect will depend on the

penetration rate that could define which mechanism dominates the pore pressure: the generation due to

penetration and compaction or the dissipation due to shear driven dilation. In this direction, additional

numerical simulations that include partial drainage behavior are currently underway by the authors and

further discussion will be published in the future.

Further, comparisons with other failure surfaces around the CPTU (like the one proposed by Salgado &

Prezzi 2007) are being done and analyzed with respect to its use for interpretation of CPTU data from

silts. Regarding the local drainage between the contractive and dilative zones, it has been experimentally

studied in saturated samples and the effect of penetration rate is under consideration for this effect.

Numerically, the local drainage is currently being studied by using coupled consolidation analysis in FEM

modeling.

Figure 7. (a)

Magnitude of displacements |u| in a 0.5 cm penetration increment for drained and undrained penetration and (b)

p/q ratio for the points located in the failure zone at the same penetration stage

963

5 CONCLUSIONS

The application of the NTH-model for CPTU in dilative silts has been studied based on the laboratory re-

sults from x-ray micro CT and 3D-DIC analysis of the cone penetration test. By fitting the assumed theo-

retical and the observed experimental failure surfaces, it was found that both coincide in the assumption

regarding pore pressure generation and drainage around the cone during penetration.

In spite of the NTH-model assumes no dilatancy (D = 0), the inclusion of the dilatancy parameter in the

solution surprisingly does not affect the interpretation of effective stress friction angle for the silty soil

range. Numerical results are presented to confirm that the generation of pore pressures is more affected by

the relative amount of increments in the mean total stresses and the deviatoric stresses inside the failure

zone depending in which sub-zone the soil is. The results indicate that somehow the u2 pore pressure can

be used in the NTH-model. The pore pressure along the failure surface may not always be the same as u2;

however it is the measurement we get from standard CPTU. The NTH-model accounts for the excess of

pore pressure around the cone (u = u2 uo) which involves the zone below the cone and the zone along

the shaft. Burns & Mayne (1998) defined that in an undrained case the pore pressure generated in the zone

below the cone (uoct) is due to changes in the octahedral normal stress and the pore pressure generated in

the zone along the shaft (ushear) is caused by the octahedral shear stress change. Both uoct and ushear are

included (in addition to uo) in the measured pore pressure during CPTU. The NTH-model then takes that

uoct comes from the combination of uzone1 and uzone3, or according to Paniagua et al. (2013) the combi-

nation between uzoneC and uzoneD.

Further analysis have been performed (and are under analysis) in saturated samples following the same

set-up from x-ray micro CT tests (see Paniagua et al., 2013b for set-up details) in order to complete the

findings with real measurements of pore pressures.

6 REFERENCES

Allersma, H.G.B. 1987. Optical analysis of stress and strain in photoelastic particle assemblies. Technical report.

Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.

Bradshaw, A.S., Morales-Velez, A.C. & Baxter, C.D.P. 2012. Evaluation of existing CPT correlations in silt. Ge-

otechnical Journal of the SEAGS & AGSSEA 43 (4): 1-10.

Broere, dW. 2001. Tunnel face stability and new CPT applications. Department of Applied Earth Sciences, Faculty

of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology.

Burns, S.E. & Mayne, P.W. 1998. Monotonic and Dilatory Pore Pressure Decay During Piezocone Tests in Clay.

Canadian Geotechnical Journal 35 (6): 1063-1073.

DeJong, J.T., Jaeger, R.A., Boulanger, R.W., Randolph, M.F. & Wahl, D.A.J. 2013. Variable penetration rate cone

testing for characterization of intermediate soils. In: Countinho & Mayne (eds), Geotechnical and geophysical

site characterization 4: 25-42. London: Taylor & Francis.

Engin, H.K. 2013. Modelling pile installation effects: a numerical approach. PhD thesis. Delft University, Delft,

Netherlands.

Gill D and Lehane B (2001) An optical technique for investigating soil displacement patterns. Geotechnical Testing

Journal 24 (3): 324-329.

Janbu, N. 1985. Soil models in offshore engineering. 25th Rankine Lecture. Geotchnique 35 (3): 241281.

Kikuchi, Y, Sato, T., Mizutani, T. & Morikawa, Y. 2010. Plugging mechanism of open-ended piles. In: Orense,

Chouw & Pender (eds), Soil-Foundation-Structure Interaction: 27-32. London: Taylor & Francis.

Kirkeb, S. 1986. Re-evaluation of the bearing capacity factors Nq, N and Nu. Diploma thesis. Geotechnical Divi-

sion, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU (former Norwegian Institute of Technology

NTH).

Kobayashi, T. & Fukagawa, R. 2003. Characterization of deformation process of CPT using X-ray TV imaging

technology. In: Di Benedetto et al. (eds), Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials: 43-47. London: Taylor

& Francis.

Liu, J. & Iskander, M. 2010. Modelling capacity of transparent soil. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 47(4): 451-

460.

Liu, W. 2010. Axisymmetric centrifuge modelling of deep penetration in sand. PhD thesis. The University of Not-

tingham.

Long, M., 2007. Engineering characterization of estuarine silts. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hy-

drogeology (QJEGH) 40, 147161.z

964

Long, M., Gudjonsson, G., Donohue, S. & Hagberg, K. 2010. Engineering characterisation of Norwegian glacioma-

rine silt. Engineering geology 110: 51-65.

Lunne, T., Robertson, P.K., Powell, J.J.M., 1997. Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice. London: Black-

ie Academic and Professional.

Mayne, P.W. 2012. Geotechnical site exploration in the year 2012. In: Proceedings of the 16th Nordic Geotechnical

Meeting, Copenhagen 2: 11-27.

Morita, K., Otani, J., Mukonoki, T., Hironaka, J. & Pham, K.D. 2007. Evaluation of vertical and lateral bearing ca-

pacity mechanisms of pile foundations using X-ray CT. In: Kikuchi, Otani, Kimura & Morikawa (eds), Advances

in deep foundations: 217-223.London: Taylor & Francis.

Muromachi, T. 1974. Experimental study on application of static cone penetrometer to subsurface investigation of

weak cohesive soils. First European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Stockholm.

Ngan-Tillard, D.J.M., Cheng, X.H., van Nes, J. & Zitha, P.L.J. 2005. Application of x-ray computed tomography to

cone penetration tests in sands. In: Mayne et al. (eds); Geo-Frontiers 2005: Site Characterization and Model-

ling: 1-12. ASCE

Ni, Q., Hird, C. & Guymer, I. 2010. Physical modelling of pile penetration in clay using transparent soil and parti-

cle image velocimetry. Gotechnique 60 (2): 121-132.

Paniagua, P., And, E., Silva, M., Nordal, S. & Viggiani, G. 2013a. Global failure pattern around a penetrating

coned tip by x-ray micro tomography and Digital Volume Correlation. In: Proceedings of the 1st International

Conference on Tomography of Materials and Structures, Ghent, Belgium: 281-284.

Paniagua, P., And, E., Silva, Emdal, A., Nordal, S. & Viggiani, G. 2013b. Soil deformation around a penetrating

cone in silt. Geotchnique Letters 3: 185-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/geolett.13.00067

Paniagua, P., Gylland, A.S. & Nordal, S. 2012. Experimental study of the deformation pattern around a penetrating

coned tip. In: Laloui & Ferrari (eds), Multiphysical Testing of Soils and Shales: 227-232. Berlin: Springer.

Robinsky, E.I., & Morrison, C.F. 1964. Sand displacement and compaction around model friction piles. Canadian

Geotechnical Journal 1(2): 81-93.

Roy, M., Michaud, D., Tavenas, F.A., Leroueil, S. & La Rochelle, P. 1974. The interpretation of static cone pene-

tration test in sensitive clay. First European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Stockholm.

Salgado, R. & Prezzi, M. 2007. Computation of cavity expansion pressure and penetration resistance in sands. In-

ternational Journal of Geomechanics 7 (4): 251-265.

Salgado, R. 2013. The mechanics of cone penetration: contribution from experimental and theoretical studies. In:

Coutinho & Mayne (eds), Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization 4: 131-153. London: Taylor &

Francis.

Sandven, R. 1990. Strength and deformation parameters of fine-grained soils determined from piezocone tests. PhD

thesis. Geotechnical Division, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU (former NTH).

Sandven, R. 2003. Geotechnical properties of a natural silt deposit obtained from field and laboratory tests.In: In-

ternational workshop on characterization and engineering properties of natural soils, NUS Singapore 2: 1121-

1148. Balkema.

Schanz, T., Vermeer, P.A. & Bonnier, P.G. 1999. The Hardening-Soil model: formulation and verification. Beyond

2000 in Computational Geotechnics: 281-290.

Senneset, K. & Janbu, N. 1985. Shear strength parameters obtained from static cone penetration tests. In: Chaney &

Demars (eds), Strength testing of marine sediments: laboratory and in-situ measurements ASTM STP 883: 41-

54. Philadelphia.

Senneset, K., Janbu, N. & Svan, G. 1982. Strength and deformation parameters from cone penetration tests. 2nd

European Conference on Penetration Testing (ESOPT II) 2: 863-870.

Senneset, K., Sandven, R., Lunne, T., By, T. & Amundsen, T. 1988. Piezocone tests in silty soils. In: ISOPT-1, Or-

lando, FL: 955-966. Rotterdam: Balkema.

Sennesset, K., Sandven, R. & Janbu, N. 1989. Evaluation of soil parameters from piezocone tests. In: Symposium on

in-situ testing of soil properties for transportation facilities, Washingtong D.C.: 24-37.

Silva, M.F. and Bolton, M.D. 2005. Interpretation of centrifuge piezocone tests in dilatant, low plasticity silts. In:

International Conference on Problematic Soils, Cyprus: 1-8.

van Nes, J. 2004. Application of computerized tomography to investigate strain fields caused by cone penetration in

sand. MSc Dissertation. Delft University, Delft, Netherlands.

White, D.; Take, W. & Bolton, M. 2003. Soil deformation measurement using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and

photogrammetry. Geotchnique 53 (7): 619-631.

Yasafuku, N. & Hyde, A.F.L. 1995. Pile end bearing capacity in crushable sands. Geotchnique 45(4):663676.

7 APPENDIX A

Nu solution from Kirkeb (1986) for vertical load (r = 0) which applies for the case of cone penetration test

965

1 2

3

2 2

3

1 2

1 2

1

1

1 2

45

2

0.67

90

90

tan 45

2

tan 45

1 for 0

8 APPENDIX B

Parameter Value

Unit weight of the soil () 12 kN/m

Friction angle () 32

Dilatancy angle () 2

Cohesion (cref) 5 kPa

Drained triaxial secant stiffness (E50ref) 3000 kPa

Primary oedometer tangent stiffness (Eoedref) 3000 kPa

Unloading/reloading stiffness (Eurref) 15000 kPa

Power for stress-level dependency (m) 0.5

Reference stress (pref) 100 kPa

Poissons ratio (ur) 0.2

966

## Molto più che documenti.

Scopri tutto ciò che Scribd ha da offrire, inclusi libri e audiolibri dei maggiori editori.

Annulla in qualsiasi momento.