Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Link
The affirmatives focus on police officers as the core of racism
in society is inherently flawed. Banning qualified immunity just
beats around the bush it has no intrinsic value in minimizing
oppression. Police bigotry is a mere reflection of state racism.
AND
The Police are inherently bad, not as individual agents but as a
group because there were created to subjugate the others
within society
AND
Current passages of qualified immunity dont take into account
race or LBGT community, this creates a system in which police
are able to abuse their power -
Walker 09 [April J. Walker, September 4, 2009 RACIAL PROFILING -SEPARATE AND UNEQUAL KEEPING THE
MINORITIES IN LINE- THE ROLE OF LAW ENFORCEMNET IN AMERICA file ]
To fulfill the expectations of a new global society, one that would erect
effective barriers around humankind's most murderous forms of self-
determination, 17 the essential initiatives must be undertaken within
States. In this connection, national leaders can never be expected to
initiate the essential changes on their own. Rather, the new evolutionary
vanguard must -- in the fashion of the growing worldwide movement against nuclear weapons and nuclear
war 18 -- grow out of informed publics throughout the world. Such a vanguard
[*8] must aim to end the separation of State interests from those of its citizens
and from those of humanity as a whole. This vanguard must grow out of searches for individual
self-determination. But the journey from the herd to selfhood begins in myth and ends in doubt. For this
journey to succeed, the individual traveling along the route must learn to
substitute a system of uncertainties for what he has always believed; learn
to tolerate and encourage doubt as a replacement for the comforting
"securities" of Statism. Induced to live against the grain of our civilization, he must become not only
conscious of his singularity, but also satisfied with it. Organically separated from "civilization,"
he becomes aware of the forces that undermine it, forces that offer him a
last remaining chance for both meaning and survival .
It will be uncomfortable, it will be hard, and it will require continued effort but the necessary
step in fixing this problem, like all problems, is the community as a whole admitting that such a problem with many socially
acceptable choices exists in the first place. Like all systems of social control, the reality of racism in debate is
who has since graduated after leaving debate, had an adult judge write out a ballot that concluded by hypothetically defending my student
being lynched at the tournament. Another debate concluded with a young man defending that we can kill animals humanely, just like we did that guy
Troy Davis. Community norms would have competitors do intellectual gymnastics or make up rules to accuse black debaters of breaking to escape hard
acknowledge the reality of the oppressed, engage the discussion from the perspective of
authors who are black and brown, and then find strategies to deal with the issues at hand. It
hurts to see competitive seasons come and go and have high school students and judges spew the same hateful things you expect
to hear at a Klan rally. A student should not, when presenting an advocacy that aligns them with the oppressed, have to justify why
Debate is not just a game, but a learning environment with
oppression is bad.
liberatory potential . Even if the form debate gives to a conversation is not the same you would use to discuss race in general
conversation with Bayard Rustin or Fannie Lou Hamer, that is not a reason we have to strip that conversation of its connection to a reality that black
If hierarchical social relationships, and the forces that create them, are abolished in favour of ones that encourage participation and
are based on the principle of "one person, one vote" then natural differences would not be able to be turned into hierarchical power.
without capitalist property rights there would not be means by which a
For example,
minority could monopolize the means of life (machinery and land) and enrich themselves by
the work of others via the wages system and usury (profits, rent and interest). Similarly, if workers
manage their own work, there is no class of capitalists to grow rich off their labour .
Thus Proudhon: "Now, what can be the origin of this inequality? "As we see it, . . . that origin is the realization within society of this
triple abstraction: capital, labour and talent. "It is because society has divided itself into three categories of citizen corresponding to
the three terms of the formula. . . that caste distinctions have always been arrived at, and one half of the human race enslaved to
the other. . . socialism thus consists of reducing the aristocratic formula of capital-labour-talent into the simpler formula of labour! . .
. in order to make every citizen simultaneously, equally and to the same extent capitalist, laborer and expert or artist." [No Gods, No
Masters, vol. 1, pp. 57-8] Like all anarchists, Proudhon saw this integration of functions as the key to equality and freedom and
Thus self-management is the key to social
proposed self-management as the means to achieve it.
equality. Social equality in the workplace, for example, means that everyone has an
equal say in the policy decisions on how the workplace develops and changes .
Anarchists are strong believers in the maxim "that which touches all, is decided by all."
HUMAN NATURE ARGUMENTS ARE BASED ON INCOMPLETE
HUMANS UNDER THE STATE; ONLY THROUGH ANARCHY CAN WE
SEE TRUE HUMAN NATURE [Assumption the aff make on human
inherent racism is flawed because it is based on the
imcomplete nature of people under the state]
Iain McKay et al, Gary Elkin, Dave Neal and Ed Boraas; The Anarchist
FAQ, May 13, 2006; http://www.infoshop.org/faq/secA2.html; Accessed July
10, 2006; // WFI- DR