Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Lauren Porter
Introduction
This textbook review examines Grammar in Context 3 (6th ed.) by Sandra Elbaum
in order to evaluate the book and determine its utility for use with English as a second
language learners. Several criteria were chosen to evaluate the book and will be presented
later. This evaluation begins with a brief description of the textbook, including why it was
chosen for review. Criteria for the evaluation of the textbook are described, followed by a
detailed description of how the book fares based on the different criteria. Lastly, there is
Modals and Related Expressions, in order to thoroughly examine one linguistic feature
Grammar in Context 3 (6th ed.) was chosen because INTO CSU, the intensive
English program at CSU, is not fully satisfied with the coursebook they are currently
using, and had a list of series to review for possible use, including this one. Some of
INTO CSUs concerns with their current coursebook, derived from feedback by teachers
at INTO, are that it does not always focus on form and meaning of the grammar, doesnt
recycle connected grammar structures throughout the book, and that there is sometimes
the activities. Based on its content, the current book used at INTO is appropriate for
Textbook Overview
Elbaum says, Learning a language in context, whether it be from the home, from
work, or from a textbook, cannot be overestimated (2016, p. xi). It can be gleaned from
the title of the work, as well as from the authors note, that this book focuses heavily on
The book features pictures from National Geographic at the beginning of each
chapter, readings (with listening exercises), grammar charts, lesson summary activities,
writing and editing practice, and an online workbook that provides students with
interactive grammar activities. The photos provide unique visuals for students, and an
especially useful characteristic of the book is its use of tables to present grammar in each
chapter. The chapters have tables that describe use, with an explanation, patterns, and
comparisons to other related grammar structures. The use of tables seems helpful for
clarification when instructing, and they appeal to visual learners. The book does not itself
proclaim which proficiency level students it targets, but the grammar content includes the
following (listed by chapter): 1: verb review 2: present perfect and present perfect
continuous 3: passive and active voice 4: past continuous, past perfect, past perfect
continuous 5: modals and related expressions 6: modals in the past 7: adjective clauses
and descriptive phrases 8: infinitives and gerunds 9: adverbial clauses and phrases,
sentence connectors (conjunctive adverbs), so/such that for result 10: noun clauses 11:
In the back of the textbook there are numerous appendices covering, but not
limited to: vowel and consonant pronunciation charts, noncount noun lists, the use of
GRAMMAR TEXTBOOK REVIEW 4
articles, lists of verbs and adjectives that are followed by prepositions, irregular verb
Evaluation Criteria
As pointed out in Teaching materials and the roles of EFL/ESL teachers, criteria
for choosing a textbook should incorporate both program factors (concerns of the
program) as well as teacher factors (concerns of the teachers) (McGrath, 2013). The
evaluation criterion for this review focus on the concerns that teachers and INTO CSU
expressed in their request for the textbook review. The evaluation criteria for this review
Table 1
Evaluation Criteria
Criteria Explanation
1. Appropriate introduction of grammar Does the book focus on form and meaning?
Is there a presentation of both meaning and
a focus on production?
Now that the evaluation criteria have been presented, it is important to understand
exactly how the criteria were used. A scoring scheme was adopted from Language
curriculum design (Nation & Macalister, 2010)-see Table 2 below. The scoring scheme
was designed so that the textbook was scored on the criteria presented (the particular
feature can receive a score from 1-5, with one being the lowest), but also so that each
score receives a weight (weighted 1-3, with 3 being the most important). This allows the
evaluator to thoroughly analyze the text in a realistic manner, because the criteria reflect
features in the text so that the evaluator can see how thoroughly the most important
Evaluation
Table 2
Textbook Evaluation
was a broad term used to cover the many sub-criteria for this piece of criterion (as
presented in Table 1). The book received a score of 5/5 for this criteria because each
chapter provides charts and tables that focus on language form/structure, examples of the
form in use with explanations (meaning), and gives plenty of room for exercises for
This criteria was weighted 2/3 because although it is important that the target
grammar structure of each chapter is, in fact, the focus of the chapter, it is not the most
important criteria because if other grammar is also sprinkled into the chapter, that is okay.
However, it is important that the proclaimed grammar feature does, in fact, receive the
most focus. The book received a score of 4/5 because, though it mainly focuses on the
explicit grammar form, it is impossible (due to the nature of syntax) for a book to only
require knowledge of the form being explained in the chapter to complete exercises.
This criteria was weighted 2/3 because although recycling material to increase
exposure to grammar features is important, classes must meet learning criteria for
different structures, which means that a certain number of new language structures must
be presented in the time allotted for the class. In this sense, the book cannot focus too
heavily on recycling material because then enough new material may not be presented.
The book received a score of 3/5 because there is evidence of some recycling of forms
GRAMMAR TEXTBOOK REVIEW 7
(for example chapter 4 compares the past perfect continuous with the present perfect
continuous learned in chapter 2), but this sort of repetition is not frequent in the text.
This criteria was weighted 2/3 because although it is important for there not to be
an excessive use of metalanguage, and it is helpful for students to have the appropriate
cultural knowledge to complete the exercises and understand, the teacher can compensate
received a score of 5/5 because there was little to no use of metalanguage, and because
the book introduces the content topic at the beginning of the chapter (and all language
form instruction, and production, is related to the content). When the content for the
Additionally, the language structures presented closely follow the structures taught at the
This criteria was weighted 3/3 because the name of the book is Grammar in
Context and the book professes to teach grammar contextually. The book received a score
of 5/5 because it does, in fact, teach the grammar structures and have students produce
the grammar structures in relation to the context introduced at the beginning of each
chapter. The book says it, presents grammar in interesting contexts (Elbaum, 2016, p.
xii), but because interesting is a subjective term, this aspect of the context was not
taken into consideration for the evaluation. It seems more appropriate for instructors
GRAMMAR TEXTBOOK REVIEW 8
(who are more familiar with students interests) to evaluate if the context would be
Examining Modals
The book introduces modals in Chapter 5 and then discusses modals in the past in
Chapter 6. For this review, the presentation of modals in Chapter 5 will be the focus.
Here the critique of the description of modals will in part be compared to the description
of modals in The Grammar Book (Larsen-Freeman & Celce-Muria, 2016). The textbook
will be evaluated to see if modals are presented in context (as the book purports), if
plenty of examples, if students are given plenty of space for practice with production, and
The theme for the chapter is technology, and the book does present the modals in
context. The chapter begins with a reading passage related to technology with examples
of modals bolded in the text to draw learners attention to the form. There is plenty of
space for students to practice production within the chapter; there are listening exercises
and fill-in-the-blank passages where students are asked to change maybe statements into
the modals provided underneath the blank line. Additionally, there are numerous tables
with the examples of the modals in use and, next to that, an explanation.
The chapter presents tables, and then chances for production. The modals are
presented in different tables regarding their function. For example, the first table gives an
overview of the modal verbs. However, the book does not list the modals shall and will,
which are presented in The Grammar Book (Larsen-Freeman & Celce, Murcia, 2016, p.
139). Not including these modals is a disadvantage for students because they are frequent
GRAMMAR TEXTBOOK REVIEW 9
in Standard English. The next tables move on to discuss first modals of possibility, then
logical conclusion, probability vs. possibility, and continuous modals. While this is a very
practical way to approach modals because it divides the modals based on meaning, these
are not always firm lines. However, it is a good way to rid the book of metalanguage
Where the text seems to fall short is by not describing the difference between
modals and phrasal modals. It presents the modal verbs (Elbaum, 2016, p. 135) making it
appear to the learner that this is an exhaustive list of modals, but doesnt mention
anything about different forms of modals (phrasal modals). However, they are introduced
in Table 5.3 (Elbaum, 2016, p. 137), with no explanation as to their different form.
Because there is no explanation at all as to the new forms, students may be confused
about them. A more comprehensive way to present the modals would be similar to The
Grammar Book, which presents each modal and their equivalent (by semantic meaning)
phrasal modal next to them. This would be an easy table for the textbook to add to the
chapter.
Overall, the book does a good job scaffolding the material but does not make the
distinction between modals and phrasal modals, and also doesnt present all of the
modals.
Final Notes
Overall, based on the evaluation of the textbook presented in Table 2 and the
further examination of Chapter 5 on modals, the textbook does a good job of what it
claims to, which is to present grammar in context. There is plenty of space for
GRAMMAR TEXTBOOK REVIEW 10
content for the learners. The book falls short in the area of recycling grammar material
throughout the chapter. Additionally, Chapter 5 on modals did an overall good job of
presenting the materials, but the lack of inclusion of some modals and lack of distinction
between modals and phrasal modals, is concerning. The lack of distinction (or a clear
References
and use for English language teachers. U.S.: Heinle Cengage Learning.
McGrath, Ian. (2013). Teaching materials and the roles of efl/esl teachers:
Nation, I.S.P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language curriculum design. New York, NY:
Routledge.