Stage 1 Design Package

!
TECKS!INDUSTRIES!
Stage!1!Design!Package!
Project:!Mars!Rover!!
Revision:!E!
!
!
TECKS INDUSTRIES
In the following documents, we will present you with a documentation package for the construction
of the Mars Rover.
This document package contains the following documents
Document name PDF document title Revision

Drawing package tecks_dp_E E
Design Specifications tecks_ds_E E
Risk Management plan tecks_rmp_E E
Tender Evaluation Criteria Tecks_tec_D D
Gantt chart (Project schedule) GanttChart_RevisionC C
We state that this assignment is our own original work, except where we have appropriately cited
the original source.
We agree that this assignment has not previously been submitted in any form for this or any other
unit, degree or diploma at any university or other institute of tertiary education.
Further we state that all requirements as stated in the client brief have been met and we
acknowledge that it is our responsibility to check that the file we have submitted is:
a) readable,
b) the correct file and
c) fully complete.
We understand that we can check this during Step 2 of the file submission process and by viewing
the file in the Assignment Inbox once it has been uploaded.
Regards,
Ellisha Reynolds
Shaun Mathew
Corinne Dale
Thomas Morgan
Kaycee Gemaol
tecks_CoverLetter_B
!
TECKS!INDUSTRIES!
Drawing!Package!
Project:!Mars!Rover!!
Revision:!E!
!
!
Table&of&Drawings&&
!
Number' Description! Sheet!no.!

!
tecks_01' 3D!Projection!! 1!
tecks_02' 3D!Exploded!Projection!and!Wheel! 2!
tecks_03' Plan!and!Elevation! 3!
tecks_04' Wheel!Section!and!Detail! 4!
tecks_05' Drilling!and!Cutting!Body!Template! 5!
!
tecks_dp_E! ! TECKS!INDUSTRIES!!
TECKS INDUSTRIES
Design Specification
Project: Mars Rover

Revision: E
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2
2.0 Materials Required...................................................................................................................... 2
2.1 Bill of materials ............................................................................................................................. 2
3.0 specialist Equipment ......................................................................................................................... 3
3.1 Specialist Equipment required ...................................................................................................... 3
3.2 Specialist Equipment techniques .................................................................................................. 3
3.2.1 Drilling ..................................................................................................................................... 3
3.2.2 Utility Knife ............................................................................................................................. 3
3.2.3 Saw ......................................................................................................................................... 4
4.0 Construction Sequence ..................................................................................................................... 4
4.1 Mars Rover body ........................................................................................................................... 4
4.2 Rover Wheels ................................................................................................................................ 5
4.3 Fittings........................................................................................................................................... 6
4.3.1 Axle preparation .................................................................................................................... 6
4.4 Body assembly .............................................................................................................................. 6
4.5 Operating the Mars Rover ............................................................................................................ 6
5.0 Appendices ........................................................................................................................................ 7
5.1 Web references to Materials list................................................................................................... 7
Page 1 of 7
tecks_ds_E TECKS INDUSTRIES
1.0 Introduction
This document details all specifications regarding the design construction of the prototype Mars
Rover to hold the full 600mL water bottle. This detail involves the materials, including prices and
places obtainable. Details are included of equipment needed and any specialist techniques required
to operate the equipment. Further this document details each stage of the construction sequence
required to build the Mars Rover.
2.0 Materials Required

2.1 Bill of materials
Based upon the drawing package, the following bill of materials has been constructed:
Material Purpose Cost per No. req. / Total cost Place(s)

unit dimensions obtainable
Tape- PVC Wheel $3.65 per ~430mm/wheel $3.65 Bunnings*
Duct/Silver traction roll 1 Roll req.
48mm x 30mm
CD/DVD Main wheel $0.80 ea. 8 CDs req. $6.4 Recycled,
Construct (2/wheel) Officeworks
120mm
Cork Centre $1.50 ea. 2 req. $3.0 Recycled
wheel 25mm
construct
Elastic Main body $0.06 ea. 8 Bands $3.83 Officeworks*,
band 1 bag, Newsagents,
155x128x3mm Coles
Glue- hot Wheel $0.80 ea. ~2 $1.99 Spotlight*
glue stick construction 1 pack req.
Tube- Main body $5.35 1 req. $5.35 Aus post*,
cardboard 90 x 850mm Newsagents,
Officeworks
Bubble Wheels $1.09 per ~3m x 300mm $3.28 Officeworks*
wrap Meter 1 roll req.
Rigid Riser Axle rod $0.89 2 req. $1.78 Bunnings*
with 200mm 7mm
Adaptor
Hex Nut Axle $0.17 4 req. $0.68 Bunnings*
M8- 6.5x13mm
Subtotal $29.96
*note: these are the places where the prices are sourced, see attached reference list 5.1
Page 2 of 7
3.0 specialist Equipment
3.1 Specialist Equipment required
Equipment (Tool(s)) Purpose Alternate tool(s)
Hot glue Gun Constructing wheel Epoxy, Universal/Fast grip adhesives,
Gorilla glue, Selleys Liquid nails
Electric Hand Drill with Drilling cork for Spike/ nail and a hammer (not
wheel and drilling recommended)
holes for body
construction
8mm wood drill bit Cork Drilling and Drill bits 2mm will be acceptable if
body construction necessary
Utility (Stanley) Knife Cutting cork for Kitchen knife, thin saw
wheel and Body
construction
Wooden cutting board Wheel and body Scrap wood, work bench
construction
Thin blade Saw Body construction No recommended alternatives
Spike Body construction Electric hand drill, Nail, sharp object
Hammer Body construction No recommended alternatives
Printer Body template N/A
3.2 Specialist Equipment techniques

3.2.1 Drilling
Inserting the drill bit
Depending on the drill inserting drill bits may differ one method is to first release the speed
control trigger, the forward/reverse button is pushed. It is then important to hold the base
of the chuck while the drill bit is inserted. The chuck is turned counter clockwise and the
forward/release button pressed
It is important that a piece of scrap material (i.e. a wooden cutting board) is placed behind
the drilling surface so as to protect the surface beneath the object being drilled
Using the drill during body Construction
Do not rush the drilling process. Too much force should not be exerted, rather gravity and
the drill will do the work.
Using the drill during wheel construction
It is important that the cork is held secure without injury. If possible use a vice or exercise
caution when holding and operating the drill ensure 90 alignment, and be careful that the
drill does not go through and drill into the other side.
3.2.2 Utility Knife
When using a blade of any kind exercise caution by not rushing the cutting process and
ensuring the material be held as far away as possible from where the cut is being made. To
ensure that the other side does not ensue damage it is recommended to place a wooden
cutting board behind
Page 3 of 7
3.2.3 Saw
When sawing the tube for the body it is recommended to have one person using the saw,
and another holding the long end of the tube, which will assist in avoiding stress on one
person.
The sawing cannot be rushed or this will create a rough edge. Use slow, shallow cuts to
create a smooth, straight finish.
4.0 Construction Sequence

Before proceeding with construction collect and obtain the materials to construct the mars
rover and inspect visually for any faults
Check that the dimensions of the materials that will be used to construct the Rover comply
with the drawing tecks_03 Plan and Elevation
The construction should proceed as follows;
4.1 Mars Rover body
1. Print the A3 template; tecks_05 Drilling and Cutting Body Template,

check if the dimensions are correct with a ruler:
(return) Hatch - 85x150mm
Axle centre, offset from edge - 16 mm
Axle hole - 8mm
Short distance between two axles centres - 148.5mm
(if the dimensions are wrong, team should contact TECKS).
2. Cut the three marked cut sections of the template with a utility knife on
an appropriate surface.
3. Take the two caps off the tube and put them aside. Glue the paper onto
one end of the uncut tube, making sure that one of the paper edges that
has just been cut aligns with the end of the tube, and the hatch cut out
lies parallel to the length of the tube. The paper should wrap around the
tube with an overlap of ~2mm.
4. Check that the axle holes at each ends are aligned across the width of the
tube, leave to dry (approximately two hours or until glue is firm
note: be sure to line the paper up with the end of the tube to ensure the
axle holes are aligned properly. The tube comes with 1mm caps which
should be taken off prior to this cut.
5. Make shallows grooves with a saw all around the tube, at the dotted line
of the paper and use these as a marker to saw through the tube
note: specialist equipment technique section 3.2.1
6. Centre punch the four marked axle holes using a spike/nail/sharp object
and a hammer.
7. Drill holes using the drill bit specified in 3.1 on the work surface (wooden
board, work table, etc.) with the holes facing up, and drilling in a
downwards motion as specified in section 3.2.
Page 4 of 7
8. Make grooves for the hatch using a cutter knife similar to the use of the
saw in step 2 this should be performed slowly to ensure clean edges
9. Cut the hatch out using a saw or a cutter knife, Saw the shorter edges first, using a
saw or utility knife, being careful not to over-saw. Similar to step 2, rotate the body
slightly while sawing. Cut the longer edges using the utility knife, from the edge to
the midpoint, from both sides. Removed the hatch once it is free.
4.2 Rover Wheels

1. Lie the cork sideways on the wooden board so as to not to damage the underlying
surface
2. Mark the cork 15mm wide with a pen all the way around, and cut the cork along this
line.
Note 3.2.2 the specialist equipment techniques section on using the knife.
3. Place the cork so that it sits circular on the wooden block
mark lines across the diameter of the cork, perpendicular to each other in the shape
of a cross so that where these lines intersect will be the exact centre. Make sure to
check these marks are correct before drilling.
4. Drill cork the cork through this centre mark so that the 8mm drill piece will fit
smoothly through the hole when drilled from either side. Note 3.2.1 the specialist
equipment techniques
5. Likewise to the process of centring the cork, draw two lines across the cd as a guide
to glue the cork in the centre of the CD
6. Place glue along the centre plastic part of the cd surrounding the centre and then
place the Cork directly onto this glue and firmly hold the cd to the cork along where
it has been glued until the glue has visibly coloured from clear to opaque.
7. Place glue around the circle drilled in the cork on the visible side and place the other
CD in line with the previously glued CD so that the two are even as seen in diagram
tecks_04 Wheel Section and Detail. Hold the glue until it has coloured again.
Note: The CD should be glued if you can apply pressure to pull the two CDs apart and
the CD does not come away from the cork, if they do then the glue needs to be
removed and the gluing process repeated until they will not separate.
8. Cut strips of bubble wrap approximately 3cm wide and wrap around the cork until
the space between the CDs is cushioned. The bubble wrap should stop ~5mm away
from the edge of the CDs
note: to ensure the bubble wrap stays in place for the next step it may need to be
held in place using a small piece of PVC duct tape
9. Place the end of the duct tape so it lies firmly along the edges of the two CDs. Wrap
the duct tape firmly around the entire wheel so that the stretched tape concaves
into the wheel and press excess tape flat to the outer sides of the CD
note: the tape is tight enough around the edges if the wheel appears air tight and
concave to the edges as seen in diagram tecks_04 Wheel Section and Detail.
Page 5 of 7
4.3 Fittings
4.3.1 Axle preparation
1. Thread one wheel onto one axle through the hole drilled through the cork
2. Position one wheel 6.5mm from the end of the axle, then screw a nut on
to the end to secure the wheel to the axle. The nut should be screwed
tight enough that if the wheel were tugged it would not be able to slip off
the axle.
3. Repeat with another wheel, on the second axle.
4.4 Body assembly
1. Thread the two axles through the respective axle holes in body
2. Attach the other two wheels and nuts to axles using the same process as on
the first two wheels
Note: the wheel should sit secure on the axle and not move. The wheels should
sit tight to the nut screwed on the end but away from the body so that when the
wheel is spun, the axle and wheel should move as one piece, free from the body
as seen in diagram tecks_03 Plan and Elevation.
4.5 Operating the Mars Rover

1. To place water bottle inside car, slot the cap of the water bottle under
the axle, lower it in, then slide the bottle from under the axle.
2. Put the caps that were taken off the tube in step 4.1.3 back onto the
body.
Page 6 of 7
5.0 Appendices
5.1 Web references to Materials list
Perflex 48mm x 30m Silver PVC Duct Tape, (2017) Bunnings.com. Retrieved 30 March 2017,
https://www.bunnings.com.au/perflex-48mm-x-30m-silver-pvc-duct-tape_p1661123
J.Burrows No.109 Rubber Bands 100g,(2017) officeworks.com.au. Retrieved 30 March 2017,

https://www.officeworks.com.au/shop/officeworks/p/j-burrows-no-109-rubber-bands-100g-
jbrb109100#!specifications
Semco Glue Sticks 12 Pack Clear,(2017) Spotlightstores.com. Retrieved 30 March 2017,

https://www.spotlightstores.com/craft-hobbies/basic-craft-supplies/glue-adhesives/glue-
guns/semco-glue-sticks-12-pack/p/BP80347730
Pope Rigid Riser with Adaptor, (2017) Bunnings.com. Retrieved 30 March 2017,
https://www.bunnings.com.au/pope-200mm-rigid-riser-with-adaptor-single_p3126659
PPS Bubble Wrap 300mm x 3m, (2017) officeworks.com.au. Retrieved 30 March 2017,
https://www.officeworks.com.au/shop/officeworks/p/pps-bubble-wrap-300mm-x-3m-
ppsbr3003
Zenith M8 Galvanised Hex Nut, (2017) Bunnings.com. Retrieved 30 March 2017,

https://www.bunnings.com.au/zenith-m8-galvanised-hex-nut_p2445361
Mailing Tubes (TU3) - 90 x 850mm, (2017) auspost,com.au. Retrieved 30 March 2017,

https://shop.auspost.com.au/product/mailing-tubes-tu3-90-x-850mm-40898m?fm=search-
organic
Page 7 of 7
TECKS INDUSTRIES
Risk Management Plan
Project: Mars Rover

Revision: E
Contents
1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2
2.0 Risk Management Project Establishment ................................................................................ 2
2.1 Miscommunication of the procedural instructions ...................................................................... 2
2.1.1 Explanation of Hazard ............................................................................................................ 2
2.1.2 Likelihood and Severity .......................................................................................................... 2
2.1.3 Mitigation and Residual Risk .................................................................................................. 2
2.2 Incorrect materials used ............................................................................................................... 3
2.3 Inadequate funding to complete the project ............................................................................... 3
3.0 Risk Management Construction .............................................................................................. 5
3.1 Misuse of Equipment .................................................................................................................... 5
3.2 Misreading of Procedure .............................................................................................................. 6
4.0 Risk Management testing ....................................................................................................... 7
4.1 Incorrect Procedural Method ....................................................................................................... 7
4.2 Axle bowing or misalignment ....................................................................................................... 7
Page 1 of 8
tecks_rmp_E TECKS INDUSTRIES
1.0 Introduction
This document assesses the risks and suggests management of the construction of the
prototype mars rover. The identified risks cover the three stages of the rovers production;
the project establishment, construction and the final testing for handover. Each area of risk
management establishes risks and associated hazards. The likelihood and severity of each
risk is assessed and potential mitigation is stated. Further, the residual risks that may occur
after mitigation are stated.
2.0 Risk Management Project Establishment

2.1 Miscommunication of the procedural instructions
2.1.1 Explanation of Hazard

The instructions outline exactly how to build the rover without malfunction or failure. By incorrectly
or only partially following the instructions during construction potential inconsistencies or
incongruent design may occur. Incorporating new design aspects may also fall into this potential risk.
Design changes may be acceptable, if team can prove that itll lead to improvement of the rover, but
should be presented to TECKS well in advance. If TECKS feels the changes will increase the risk of this
hazard, we will reject the proposal.
2.1.2 Likelihood and Severity

The likelihood of the method being miscommunicated or not being defined is possible. The
instructions have been carefully written and reviewed by all TECKS members to ensure that all
instructions are; free of error, free flowing, explicitly stated and detailed to ensure that this risk is
minimalised. However, it should be considered as a possible risk in case certain words or steps may
be misinterpreted.
The severity of the risk depends largely on the degree of differentiation and the number of steps
that were completed incorrectly. This could range from the total outcome to be moderate to severe.
This could lead to potential movement restriction for the rover, or damage to individual parts of the
rover.
2.1.3 Mitigation and Residual Risk

Its vital that the instructions are revised several times and read well before construction. All team
members should be familiar with the process and be well aware of the necessary level of detail
required to ensure all parts of the rover are constructed accurately and according to the
instructions. If the contracting team require clarification, the TECKS team are available to schedule a
meeting or to communicate via email, thus working to ensure an error need not occur.
Communication on this must occur well before the deadline so as to avoid further delays. If an error
were to occur in procedure the designers may be required to rebuilt the rover to the specifications.
The residual risk involved with the error can cause increased delays, financial restricted movement
of the actual rover. This could lead to an improper fall off the slope, or a potential loss of important
parts of the rover.
Page 2 of 8
2.2 Incorrect materials used
Failure to use the correct materials stated in the document could cause potential damage to
the individual parts that were constructed with said incorrect material, and may lead to
vehicle failure. One of the more susceptible parts that are vulnerable to this risk are the
wheels. There is potential for cracks, shattering or disconnection from the rover if incorrect
materials are used, leading to restriction of movement. If this were to occur there would be
failure in complying with the client brief.

The likelihood of wrong materials being used is unlikely. The document details all the
necessary materials with specific measurement and properties in an explicit and clear
manner. Through design and testing these materials have been pinpointed as the most cost
efficient and effective source of materials to be used when constructing the rover. The
availability has also been taken into consideration. Extreme care should be taken and TECKS
should always be notified of any potential design change well in advance .
The risk pose severe consequences if the chosen materials are extremely less efficient, weak
or ineffective compared to the listed materials. The instructions set do not account for a
change in material, and the design of the rover will not accommodate materials as
efficiently that do not match the quality of the specified materials. The severity is
susceptible to the possibility of other materials used in an attempt to modify or improve the
design of the rover.
When purchasing, acquiring or using the materials, ensure that the materials are the same
as the ones specified in the document. Checks should be made that the material is of the
acceptable quality, and that there is no damage, bends, scratches or any other defection
that could impact on the success of the rover.
2.3 Inadequate funding to complete the project

Should there be limited funding that could prevent the purchasing of materials needed for
construction, there could be potential delays in the construction phase, leading to increase
in work load and stress for the team to complete within the given schedule. Major risks
involved is, in an effort to avoid falling behind, alternative materials are introduced, or
purchasing of lower quality materials may occur. The other alternative is that materials are
sourced through third parties that cant provide acceptable quality in an attempt to reduce
this risk. This can also occur due to potential costs through the misconstruction of the rover,
highlighted by risks in section 2.1 and 2.2.
Page 3 of 8
The likelihood of this risk occurring is possible. TECKS has considered the budget of the
project and has allowed a margin for which any potential errors through misconstruction,
purchasing of wrong materials or any other source of adding unnecessary costs onto the
project. This means that its unlikely for the group to exceed the budget. This will only occur
in the unlikely scenario that a severe proportion of the budget is wasted, and hence less
quality materials have to be purchased because of this outcome.
The rover is under the budget requested in the client brief, however, unless recycled
materials are used, which is recommended by TECKS as well as the client, there is no room
for financial errors. TECKS team members are readily contactable if there are any queries
regarding the materials, and may be able to assist in purchase of materials if team cannot
certain find products.
The severity is moderate to severe. This is similar to 2.2 due to the design of the rover being
specific to the given materials listed in the document. Failure to purchase the correct
materials will have the same outcome as listed in 2.2
Whilst it is recommended the group recycle or find the materials for cheaper prices to save
money in the budget, care must be taken to ensure the correct and undamaged materials
are used, and that the budget isnt wasted through errors in purchasing of materials. Care
must be taken to ensure that the quality of the materials is acceptable contact TECKS if the
team is unsure whether or not the materials would be acceptable.
The residual risks for incorrect purchasing of materials are the same as 2.2, but failure to
allocate the budget will result in the whole rover being of a lower quality and be at risk of
being dysfunctional, depending on the construction process and the quality of materials
purchased.
Page 4 of 8
3.0 Risk Management Construction
3.1 Misuse of Equipment

This risk involves damage both to the constructors and to the rover. There is potential for
the constructors to sustain injuries from the equipment through the misuse of it, damage to
the actual equipment and to the rover, depending on the severity of the misuse.
While the procedure doesnt require many extensive tools for the construction, some
specific tools such as the electric hand drill must be used, according to the instruction
provided with the tool to avoid such injury. This also applies to the rover, where the misuse
of the drill could lead to flaws in construction of the rover, and hence a less effective rover.

There is a possible likelihood of the risk occurring. As mentioned, the tools listed in the
procedure do not require much specialist knowledge, or any formal training or license to
operate. This risk is mostly applicable to any team members who are uncomfortable,
inexperienced or are unsure how to operate the equipment for the procedure.
There is a moderate or severe impact on all possible victims. Constructors who misuse
equipment are susceptible to injury on any body part. The damage to the rover will lean
towards the severe scale due to how its construction and how the misuse of the equipment
will affect the rest of the design. This could also cause potential financial setbacks if the
group need to replace any equipment, or could also lead to less members of the team
available if there is a sizeable injury that occurs.

Its vital that the instructions specified, both in the design specification and provided with
the tools are followed extensively and explicitly. Through the testing phase TECKS has tried
to eliminate all potential risks that may cause injury and damage as much as possible. TECKS
recommends team member with the most experience with specified tools handle the
respective steps in construction. If no member has prior experience, the group should
ensure that the member who feels most comfortable operating the tool should complete
the steps, and the instructions should be followed slowly to ensure that each step is done
perfectly and to avoid the risk of misusing the equipment. This includes wearing the
appropriate safety equipment during the contracting phase, which is safety glasses when
operating the drill and hot glue gun. Ensure that any personnel operating the tool has
privacy and support in case there is an accident. The residual risk, as stated, is the potential
for injuries to individual members that would prevent them from assisting in the
development of the rover, or any financial setbacks caused through the misuse of
equipment.
Page 5 of 8
3.2 Misreading of Procedure
The misreading of the procedure could result in:
Incorrect placement of individual parts

Using the wrong equipment
Incorrectly reading dimensions
Lack of detail and care taken, sloppy constructing
This will lead to errors in the rover, which could result in vehicle failure, the severity which
will be based on how many more errors are made, and the importance of the step that is
made with an error. For example, failure to cut out the hatch according to provided
dimensions could result in difficulties placing in the water bottle in the rover, or the bottle
falling out during testing.

There is a possible chance of the risk if the constructors are careless with the construction of
the rover, or the incorrect dimensions are used. This last point will have the biggest impact
on the design, and could have a potentially moderate severity on the design. Depending on
how early or late the error occurs in the construction phase, the group may be forced to
reconstruct the step, or if at a maximum, the whole part of the rover be reconstructed.

During each step in the instructions, care must be taken to ensure that:
All team members are fully aware of the instructions, and the severity of the error
should the instructions not be followed accurately.
All steps are read, and checked by all members and all queries should be resolved
through communication with TECKS. All actions match exactly what the instructions
state, and avoiding any unnecessary steps that the instructions do not specify.
Should any potential error occur, it should not be disregarded. The error must be
reported to TECKS, then fixed before the team can move on.
The tender evaluation lists criteria that should recruit a team that will avoid this risk,
including experience, professionalism and communication skills.
The residual risk is important when considering when the error is made. Should the team fail
to identify the error before moving on to the nest step in the procedure the error could
create a snowballing effect that will stimulate other errors. This could lead to the complete
failure of the rover.
Page 6 of 8
4.0 Risk Management testing
4.1 Incorrect Procedural Method

This risk occurs when an instruction isnt followed explicitly. Whilst it may be done correct
technically, the level of detail required could be lacking and hence lead to this risk. This may
still produce errors. Whilst it may not result in fatal errors as seen through the construction
risk management testing, the error will cause a deficiency in the design and could lead to
other small errors that will impact on the effectiveness of the rover. An example of this is
using too much bubble wrap to stuff between the wheel, causing the CD to retract away
from the cork and change the shape of the wheel.
The likelihood of this risk occurring is unlikely should the procedure be followed to the level
of detail required. The instructions prepared have been tested to ensure that every aspect
stated is important to the overall construction of the rover, and so following the procedure
will show the unlikeliness of the risk occurring. The severity ranges from low to moderate
depending on the error. The error stating above would be more moderate severity if the
wheel slightly changes shape to severe if the entire wheel becomes dysfunctional, causing
restricted movement to the rover. Some of the lower severe hazards include creating the
hatch space slightly too big or small, but not to an extensive amount.
Much like 3.2, the instructions must be carefully read to ensure that the risk doesnt occur.
The team should take the appropriate steps listed in 3.3 to ensure that the instructions are
fulfilled and followed to the extent to which they are written. The residual risk is the
sustainability of some of the individual parts of the rover, and how the error will affect
them. From the example of overstuffing bubble wrap, the dysfunctional wheel will cause the
rover to improperly move down the slope, which could lead to a harder and more damaging
landing, hence impeding the success of the design.
4.2 Axle bowing or misalignment

This risk can occur if the procedure is not followed to the correct level of detail required,
specifically during the construction of the wheels. Any error in the wheels could lead to the
bowing of the axle. This is an important part of the rover, as the axle and wheel impacts the
mobility of the rover and subsequently how well it will land off the slope. Should the axles
be misaligned, then the wheels may not touch the surface of the slope, and the fall of the
rover will have a more significant impact on the wheels.
There is a possible chance of the risk occurring If the procedure is incorrectly followed,
specifically during the construction of the wheel. This can also be a factor (although less
Page 7 of 8
likely) when the body of the rover is constructed, as the axle is designed to only hold the
weight of the body specified in the instructions provided. The risk can also occur if the
drawings are not checked to ensure that what the team is constructing matches up to what
the drawings suggest the ending design will appear to be.
The severity will be severe since the axle is one of the most significant part of the rover. The
rover cannot function if the axles bow, and will have a reduced mobility and potentially
more impactful landing. This could lead to the damaging or breaking of parts, or the rover
not properly landing on the bottom or top. The misalignment of the axles can cause damage
to the wheels or the reduced mobility of the rover.
Once again, ensure the instructions are properly followed and that care is taken to ensure
that any potential errors in the construction of the rover is identified and solved before
moving on to the next steps in the construction phase. The tender criteria should assist in
selecting experienced contractors that will follow the procedure correctly and carefully to
the required level of detail and precision. Ensure that any errors are identified immediately,
reported to TECKS, and fixed before moving on to the next set of instructions. The residual
risk is that the rover wont function effectively, and the impaired movement may cause
more severe falls during the testing phase, leading to potentially more damage to the rover
itself. It could also affect the teams financial budget should new materials are to be
purchased if there is an accident during testing, and damage both the teams and TECKS
reputation, should the rover fail.
Page 8 of 8
TECKS INDUSTRIES
Tender Evaluation Criteria
Project: Mars Rover

Revision: E
Contents
1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 2
2.0 Criteria Summary .............................................................................................................................. 2
3.0 Criteria Explained .............................................................................................................................. 3
3.1 Academic integrity ........................................................................................................................ 3
3.2 Motivated, dedicated, and will maintain a high standard for the project.................................... 4
3.3 Organized team ............................................................................................................................. 5
3.4 Possess experience and knowledge that are relevant to the project........................................... 5
3.5 Able to resolve problems .............................................................................................................. 7
3.6 Have access to materials and equipment ..................................................................................... 7
3.7 Efficient, reliable and honest communication .............................................................................. 8
3.8 Readily available and flexible with time constraints and plan changes........................................ 8
3.9 Ability to understand our design .................................................................................................. 9
Page 1 of 9
tecks_tec_D TECKS INDUSTRIES
1.0 Introduction
This document consists of the criteria that will be assessed to acquire fabrication companies
that meet TECKS standards to manufacture a Mars Rover of the highest quality. Groups will
be judged against the criteria listed below. The group that receives the highest score will be
chosen as the tenderer for the manufacture.
2.0 Criteria Summary

Criteria Title Criteria Details Mark
Academic integrity Will align themselves to the standards, values /5

and attitudes set by the Curtin AIP and will do so
for the entirety of the project
Elements of this include
o Having passed the AIP test
o Not having any previous records of
plagiarism
Keenly expresses interest in all meetings and /10

Motivated, dedicated, and conversations with TECKS.
will maintain a high Strives for a high distinction in this project and
standard for the project shows that they have achieved high distinctions
in the past
Organized team Will meet all deadlines /10

Each member understands their roles
Each member is reliable and responsible
Will provide meeting minutes and weekly
progress reports
Provides GANTT chart
Possess experience and Experience with work or projects that are /15
knowledge that are relevant relevant to aspects of the project
to the project Experience with manual work in industry (i.e.
work that involves following procedures)
Able to resolve problems Provide an example of a problem they have faced /5

in the past and how they resolved it.
Have access to tools, Marks will be awarded for: /15

materials, and equipment to o Materials that is required to construct
construct rover rover
o Equipment that is required to construct
rover
Efficient, reliable and honest All forms of communication will be replied to /20
communication within an acceptable timeframe:
Page 2 of 9
o Email: 1 day reply
Provides attached documents of previous
meeting minutes to enforce communication
skills.
Meeting schedule: Contains a list of all absentees
(as reflected also within the weekly minutes
report) at least one day before the scheduled
meeting.
Integrity of the team to admit errors and
communicate to TECKS about any errors.
Communicates all information truthfully for the
duration of the project.
Signs all documents, specifically weekly minutes,
that indicates the team has provided all
information truthfully.
Readily available and flexible Able to adjust and accept any potential changes /10
with time constraints and in schedules, unexpected emergencies or
plan changes. problems within the team.
Provides GANTT chart
Ability to understand our Able to understand all concepts, drawings and /10
design other aspects of the design package
Able to comprehensively describe all details of
the drawings provided for the project.
Offers suggestions on improvement to the
design.
/100
3.0 Criteria Explained

3.1 Academic integrity
Will align themselves to the standards, values and attitudes set by the Curtin AIP and will do so
for the entirety of the project:
Here at TECKS Industries we value academic integrity in the highest regard. We believe in
producing and designing our own original work and giving credit to all sources that assisted
in the development of our products. Therefore, the winning tenderers must guarantee that
they will uphold their academic integrity throughout the entirety of the project by working
honestly and ethically and avoiding any dishonourable act that may damage the reputation
of our companies and our members leading to restricted opportunities in the future.
Evidence:
To prove that the tenderers have a high understanding of academic integrity, they will need
to provide evidence of passing the Curtin AIP test and they must not have any record of
plagiarism in the past.
Page 3 of 9
Marks are awarded as follows:
0: AIP test has not been passed
1-2: AIP test passed with major plagiarism record
3-4: AIP test passed with minor of plagiarism record
5: AIP test passed and no evidence of plagiarism
3.2 Motivated, dedicated, and will maintain a high standard for the project
Keenly expresses interest in all meetings and conversations with TECKS:
The tenderer must display enthusiasm and passion towards the project as this indicates that
they are willing to invest their time and effort into manufacturing a Mars rover of high
standard. Manufacturing a Mars rover of a high standard may establish a proficient
reputation leading to potential opportunities for our companies. Winning tenderers can
express their keen interest during meetings conversations by being punctual, having
prepared questions for meetings, laying thoughtful input towards discussions, and doing
prior reading for the meetings.
Strives for a high distinction in this project and record of high distinctions in the past:
TECKS industries holds a high standard and we seek teams that will create our rover to a
high standard. Winning tenderers will be able to provide evidence of producing work that
has received high results in the past.
Expectations for Criteria 3.2 Pass Marks awarded for

pass
Punctual 1
Has prepared questions for meetings 1
Participates in group discussions with relevant input is 1

relevant
Does prior reading before meetings 1
Has achieved a High Distinction (>80%) 2
States they are striving for a Pass 1
States they are striving for a Distinction 1
States they are striving for a High Distinction 2
Total marks awarded /10
Page 4 of 9
3.3 Organized team
Will meet all deadlines:
Tenderer must meet all deadlines set by the unit, as well as TECKS. This is crucial in ensuring
the project runs smoothly.
Evidence:
Weekly progress report and GANTT chart should be sent to TECKS.
Weekly progress report shows the teams ability to plan tasks with deadlines, and will
display whether or not they meet the deadlines set out by themselves. GANTT chart ensures
all team members are aware of important dates and dates, dates when members are
unavailable, and demonstrates the teams ability to plan ahead.
Each member understands their roles:

An organized team consists of individuals who thoroughly understand their own
responsibilities in their group. Tenderers must be able to display their individual in-depth
knowledge that is unique to their role by explaining what they contribute to the team.
Evidence:
A brief summary of each team members strengths and/or knowledge basis should be
provided. Individual area of improvements may also be included, but is not required.
Each member is reliable and responsible:

Individuals must be able to report their work back by the deadlines that have been set. This
ensures that the progress is taking place as planned without falling behind the schedule.
TECKS seeks tenderers that we can trust and rely on to take responsibility for their own
tasks. Taking responsibility for your own task also includes seeking help when in need. Here
at TECKS we believe that individuals should be responsible for their work whilst encouraging
members to rely on one another.
Evidence:
All Meeting Minutes and Weekly Progress Report should be provided. Meeting Minutes is
evidence of the team being reliable and responsible; their ability to organise regular
meetings and commit to a schedule made is displayed. It should also show how each
members contribution during the meetings. Weekly Progress Reports should display each
members task, planned deadlines and degree of completion. This will help TECKS in
assessing each members reliability and responsibility.

0-1: Little to no requirements are met, no evidence provided.
2-4: 1 requirement is met, with evidence.
5-7: 2 requirements are met, with evidence.
8-9: All 3 requirements are met, with evidence.
10: All 3 requirements are met, with comprehensive evidence.
3.4 Possess experience and knowledge that are relevant to the project
Experience in procedural tasks:
It is the tenderers duty to manufacture a Mars rover designed by TECKS to a high standard.
The tenderers should construct the Mars rover following the design package provided by
Page 5 of 9
TECKS closely, as errors may arise if the team is unfamiliar with following procedural work,
which may lead to misconstruction.
Evidence:
Tenderer provides documents displaying a successful project that was constructed based off
a procedure. (Could be a successful experiment report, construction project, etc.)
Experience with hot glue guns:

The well-being of the members of our companies is a definite priority at TECKS Industries.
To ensure that the environment of our construction is safe for individuals and that there will
be no complications with construction, tenderers must have experience and knowledge
about how a hot glue gun functions and how to physically use one.
Evidence:
Tenderer provides documents displaying a successful project that required a hot glue gun in
its construction.
Experience with electric hand drills:

TECKS Industries cares about the health and safety of all individuals constructing the Mars
rover. In order to have safe conditions during construction it is important for hazardous
tools, specifically an electric hand drill, to be handled only by individuals who are especially
experienced and familiar with using them.
Evidence:
Tenderer provides documents displaying a successful project that required an electric hand
drill during its construction.
Experience with a utility knife:

TECKS Industries prioritises the wellbeing of all members within our companies. Therefore,
we seek tenderers who understand how to use a utility knife correctly and are able to
physically execute its use.
Evidence:
Tenderer provides documents displaying a successful project that required a utility knife
during its construction.
Experience with a thin blade saw:
The health and safety of members within our companies is always taken into serious
consideration. Tenderers must be able to use thin blade saws correctly and safely to ensure
that construction occurs with the safest conditions possible.
Evidence:
Tenderer provides documents displaying a successful project that required a thin blade saw
Experience with centre punching:
In order to minimise errors in drilling, constructors should use centre punching technique to
help them align the drill in the right position. This is one of the crucial steps in the
construction of the body, and team with members who have used this technique previously
in construction projects will be favoured.
Evidence:
Page 6 of 9
Tenderer provides documents displaying a successful project that required centre punching

0-3: Little to no evidence are provided, and criteria not met.
4-7: Less than half of the criteria are met, with some evidence
8-11: At least half the criteria are met, with sufficient evidence.
12-14: Most criteria are met, with sufficient evidence.
15: All criteria are met with comprehensive evidence.
3.5 Able to resolve problems

Provide an example of a problem and how the team resolved it:
Tenderer must work well within their team. TECKS will not be able to work with a team who
has underlying issues which may affect the project outcome. Tenderers should be able to
resolve issues, both within the team, as well as with us, as this project relies on teamwork.
Evidence:
We understand problems do arise within a team environment. If a problem does arise
within the team, a brief summary should be provided, outlining the nature of the problem,
as well as the solution and resolution.
0: Problem was not dealt with.

1-2: Problem was dealt with, outlined in summary.
3-4: Problem was dealt with in a professional, timely or fair manner, which is outlined in
summary.
5: No problems arose, or problem was dealt with in a professional, timely and fair manner,
which is clearly outlined in the summary.
3.6 Have access to materials and equipment

Materials that are required to construct rover
TECKS wishes to work with a team that is environmentally and financially aware. Ideally,
team should already possess most, or all materials required to construct the rover.
Evidence:
Tenderers must provide photo evidence of the materials listed under 2.1 Bill of Materials
Equipment that are required to construct rover

The construction of the body also depends on reliable and appropriate tools. TECKS wants
to confirm the team constructing the rover has access to correct equipments outlined in
2.2 Specialist Equipment.
Evidence:
Tenderers must provide photo evidence of the tools listed in 2.2 Specialist Equipment.
0: No evidence of materials or equipment provided.

1-4: No evidence of materials, some evidence of equipment.
5-8: Some evidence of both materials and equipment. (20%)
Page 7 of 9
9-12: Substantial evidence of both materials and equipment. (30-40%)
13-15: Considerable evidence of both materials and equipment (for full marks, team should
possess more than 60% of materials listed, and 60% of equipment listed).
3.7 Efficient, reliable and honest communication

Meeting schedule: Contains a list of all absentees as reflected also within the weekly minutes
report at least one day before the scheduled meeting:
Being prepared for our meeting is essential for TECKS, by notifying TECKS of absentees to
meetings at least one day prior to meeting it shows that the tenderers are reliable and
organised.
Evidence:
To display the tenderers reliability and organisational skills, weekly minutes must be
provided.
All forms of communication will be replied to within an acceptable timeframe:

TECKS values prompt and efficient communication, We expect emails very frequently to be
responded to within 24 hours.
Further TECKS will need to rely on the integrity of the tenderers team to admit errors and
communicate to TECKS about any errors so as to not leave a problem neglected until it is
too late to solve it.
Evidence:
This can be evidenced during meetings with TECKS.
Honesty in communication for the duration of the project:

TECKS hopes that the team will communicate honestly about the progress of the projects,
especially if the team encounters issues in any aspect of the project. We would like to work
with a team that does not withhold problems.
Evidence:
No evidence is needed. Marks will be deducted if TECKS discover dishonesty in any evidence
provided by the team in all other criteria.
0-3: Team is found to be dishonest.
4-8: Limited evidence to demonstrate the teams efficiency, reliability and communication
skills.
9-15: Sufficient evidence demonstrating teams efficiency, reliability and good
communication skills are provided.
16-20: Comprehensive evidence demonstrating teams efficiency, reliability and excellent
communication skills are provided in a timely manner.
3.8 Readily available and flexible with time constraints and plan changes
Able to adapt to any potential changes in schedules:
Our company TECKS values adaptability and flexibility during the period of our project work.
During this time, unexpected events may occur that may affect schedules. It is important to
Page 8 of 9
us that our tenderers are organised and are available to reschedule meetings, deadlines and
any other project plans.
Evidence:
Team should display willingness to be flexible and potentially change their schedules. If
applicable, team should also provide evidence of meeting rescheduling if any prior meeting
was cancelled due to issues.
0-3: Little to no evidence of availability or flexibility. Team provides evidence of cancelled

meetings without rescheduling of another meeting.
4-7: Team is sufficiently available and flexible. Evidence of rescheduled meeting is lacking.
8-10: Team is extremely available and flexible with time. No meetings were cancelled, or
sufficient evidence of rescheduling of meetings are presented.
3.9 Ability to understand our design

Understands the drawings and construction procedure of our rover design:
Tenderers must be able to display their competency in understanding the drawings provided
in the drawing package. This is crucial for our company as it reduces communication errors,
confusion and potential errors in the rover.
Evidence:
To show thorough understanding of the rover design, the tenderers must be able to explain
the drawings and construction process to TECKS.
Alternatively, or in addition to an explanation of the design, experience in AutoCAD,
sketchup or any other drawing software should be demonstrated.
Offers suggestions on improvement to the design:

Although our design may not need improvement, it is important to TECKS that the tenders
are critical of the construction of our design and identify and communicate all possibilities of
error.
Evidence:
The tenderers must input their concerns and suggestions to improve the rover design by
providing a brief critical analysis of our rover design. They should explain possible errors in
the construction process.
0: Does not display understanding of design, and no suggestions on design improvement are
made.
1-3: Offers improvements, but does not understand design.
4-6: Understand the design, but does not offer improvements.
7-9: Satisfactory understanding of design, some offer of improvements.
10: Provide comprehensive explanation of both the drawings and the construction process,
with constructive criticism for our rover design.
Page 9 of 9
TECKS Gantt Chart
Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10
27th Mar 3rd Apr 10th Apr 17th Apr 24th Apr 1st May
Assessment Physics In class Physics- Lab 3 Physics- in class Programming -mid-
s this week Test 2 (take home test 3 sem
Calculus- Workshop report unknown) Calculus- mid-sem Materials test
assessment test module 1
Programming -quiz
Important Due date for part 1 Corinne Tuition Free weeks Stage 2 designers
Dates Sun 2nd April unavailable 8th Kaycee- working 6am-2pm submission Sun 7th
Tender allocation Stage 2 contractors submission may
Upload DP to wiki available 3rd (Wed 19th Apr)
before 3rd 12 noon
Important L: Contractor and Find out who is Before the 10th Make no further W: Tender W: Q&A for
dates for designer tendering for of April: changes to the application submission
Designers expectations- your design -Upload DP to DP after 8am Evaluations Stage 2 designers
attendance weebly 12th DPR response submission Sun 7th
important portfolio activity may
-Upload your
weebly address
Important L: attend for Find out which to the group Stage 2 W: Contingency
dates for expectations designs to tender wiki contractors Plans &Ethics
Contractors for +download submission activity
&individually (wed 19 Apr)
review 1 DP
L: stage 2
submission
expectations
W: attend Q&A
Notation: L- Lecture, W-Workshop TECKS INDUSTRIES

Revision C
TECKS Gantt Chart
Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14
8th May 15Th May 22nd May 29th May
Assessments this Calculus Workshop Calculus Workshop Programming -quiz Calculus- Laboratory
week assessment assessment Materials- lab report due assessment
Materials- lab report
due
Important Dates Corinne unavailable Handovers Engineering Identity Oral Presentation

-13th -14th May reflection Peer review (workshop)
presentation (workshop) Unit reflection (in
lecture)
Important dates for L: Construction and testing W: Presentation Outlines L: Testing W: oral presentation
Designers expectations and challenges W: presentation rehearsal
W: Presentation activity
Important dates for L: Construction and testing W: Presentation Outlines L: Testing W: oral presentation
Contractors expectations and challenges W: presentation rehearsal
W: Presentation activity
Notation: L- Lecture, W-Workshop TECKS INDUSTRIES

Revision C

Stage 1 Design Package

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Stage 1 Design Package

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

!

Document name PDF document title Revision

Number' Description! Sheet!no.!

Project: Mars Rover

2.0 Materials Required

Material Purpose Cost per No. req. / Total cost Place(s)

3.2 Specialist Equipment techniques

4.0 Construction Sequence

1. Print the A3 template; tecks_05 Drilling and Cutting Body Template,

4.2 Rover Wheels

4.4 Body assembly

4.5 Operating the Mars Rover

J.Burrows No.109 Rubber Bands 100g,(2017) officeworks.com.au. Retrieved 30 March 2017,

Semco Glue Sticks 12 Pack Clear,(2017) Spotlightstores.com. Retrieved 30 March 2017,

Zenith M8 Galvanised Hex Nut, (2017) Bunnings.com. Retrieved 30 March 2017,

Mailing Tubes (TU3) - 90 x 850mm, (2017) auspost,com.au. Retrieved 30 March 2017,

Project: Mars Rover

2.0 Risk Management Project Establishment

2.1.1 Explanation of Hazard

2.1.2 Likelihood and Severity

2.1.3 Mitigation and Residual Risk

2.2.2 Likelihood and Severity

2.3 Inadequate funding to complete the project

3.1 Misuse of Equipment

3.1.2 Likelihood and Severity

3.1.3 Mitigation and Residual Risk

Incorrect placement of individual parts

3.2.2 Likelihood and Severity

3.2.3 Mitigation and Residual Risk

4.1 Incorrect Procedural Method

4.2 Axle bowing or misalignment

Project: Mars Rover

2.0 Criteria Summary

Academic integrity Will align themselves to the standards, values /5

Keenly expresses interest in all meetings and /10

Organized team Will meet all deadlines /10

Able to resolve problems Provide an example of a problem they have faced /5

Have access to tools, Marks will be awarded for: /15

3.0 Criteria Explained

Expectations for Criteria 3.2 Pass Marks awarded for

Has prepared questions for meetings 1

Participates in group discussions with relevant input is 1

Does prior reading before meetings 1

Has achieved a High Distinction (>80%) 2

States they are striving for a Pass 1

States they are striving for a Distinction 1

States they are striving for a High Distinction 2

Total marks awarded /10

Each member understands their roles:

Each member is reliable and responsible:

Marks are awarded as follows:

Experience with hot glue guns:

Experience with electric hand drills:

Experience with a utility knife:

Marks are awarded as follows:

3.5 Able to resolve problems

0: Problem was not dealt with.

3.6 Have access to materials and equipment

Equipment that are required to construct rover

0: No evidence of materials or equipment provided.

3.7 Efficient, reliable and honest communication

All forms of communication will be replied to within an acceptable timeframe:

Honesty in communication for the duration of the project: