Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
no:37/7
(We have original sale deed and MR for this Survey No and RTC till 1999 and
2013 onwards)
2. On 19th April 1996 , A Sampanna executed a sale deed to Senthil Rani W/O
Karunakaran
(Certified copy Attached)
3. On 25/5/1996, KIADB Notification happened and Final Notification Happened
on 30/9/1997
(Doc produced)
4. The old no was poded to 37/1e and subsequently 37/1e1 in 2000
5. We had prayed for KIADB to pay us the compensation, for the above land
acquired from 2005 but there is no response from them
6. Subsequently we filed a case in AC Court in 29/4/2010 and got an order to
change the revenue records to Naryanappa name in 2013. Based on the
order we got revenue records mutated in Naryanappas LR Name Shardamma
and Paid tax for the year 2014 also.
7. We had also filed a case in Chief Judicial Magistrate Court Case No 5069/2008
Important questions:
1. In the notification it is clearly mentioned Naryanappa is the khatedar, but
KIADB has accepted that senthil rani has the owner of it( This is utter
Administrative failure of KIADB)
2. KIADB has not responded to the prayer of Naryanappa in 2005 (Application
attached)
3. KIADB executed LCSA to Mr Karunakaran MD of Perkinn International Hotel on
30/11/1998 without paying compensation to the real owner
4. KIADB has not paid any compensation to the above property in respect to
acquisition which is clearly admitted by them in the writ petition 31907/2011.
5. But in EC from 96 to 2004, it reflects that on payment of 31,77,100 Rupees
they had executed LCSA for survey no 371e1
6. KIADB had terminated the LCSA in 7/5/2004
7. Once again they extended the time further on 31/12/2005 based on the writ
petition filed by Karunakaran 21984/2004
8. Till date the land is not utilized for the allotted purpose.
RTC of 37/1e1 from 2005 till 2012 speaks about the land is in the name of senthil
rani . This is really a not acceptable job from such a premier government body
KIADB
Our Prayer:
Since the land was acquired by KIADB and compensation not payed till date and
the purpose for which the land was acquired is not fulfilled.
Negative aspects:
1.We never filed any objection to KIADB because we thought KIADB will
pay us. We did not knew that sampanna has colluded with karunakarn
and KIADB and sold property to Karunakaran.