Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Rohit Budhiraja
Two popular multi-user channels -multiple access (MAC) and broadcast (BC)
1 References T&V Chapter 10, Sec 10.1 and Sec 10.2, Fundamentals of multi-user MIMO, book chapter by Sangunietti et. al.
MIMO Wireless Communications (Rohit Budhiraja, IITK) Multi-user Communications 2
Multi-user channels (1)1
Two popular multi-user channels -multiple access (MAC) and broadcast (BC)
MAC Multiple transmitters simultaneously transmitting to a receiver
Example uplink of a cellular system
1 References T&V Chapter 10, Sec 10.1 and Sec 10.2, Fundamentals of multi-user MIMO, book chapter by Sangunietti et. al.
MIMO Wireless Communications (Rohit Budhiraja, IITK) Multi-user Communications 2
Multi-user channels (1)1
Two popular multi-user channels -multiple access (MAC) and broadcast (BC)
MAC Multiple transmitters simultaneously transmitting to a receiver
Example uplink of a cellular system
multiple users simultaneously transmitting to a base station
1 References T&V Chapter 10, Sec 10.1 and Sec 10.2, Fundamentals of multi-user MIMO, book chapter by Sangunietti et. al.
MIMO Wireless Communications (Rohit Budhiraja, IITK) Multi-user Communications 2
Multi-user channels (1)1
Two popular multi-user channels -multiple access (MAC) and broadcast (BC)
MAC Multiple transmitters simultaneously transmitting to a receiver
Example uplink of a cellular system
multiple users simultaneously transmitting to a base station
1 References T&V Chapter 10, Sec 10.1 and Sec 10.2, Fundamentals of multi-user MIMO, book chapter by Sangunietti et. al.
MIMO Wireless Communications (Rohit Budhiraja, IITK) Multi-user Communications 2
Multi-user channels (2)
Bandwidth W = 1 Hz is divided into fraction and 1 for user-1 and user-2 respectively
Bandwidth W = 1 Hz is divided into fraction and 1 for user-1 and user-2 respectively
!
P1 ||h1 ||2
R1 log 1+ bps/Hz
N0
Bandwidth W = 1 Hz is divided into fraction and 1 for user-1 and user-2 respectively
!
P1 ||h1 ||2
R1 log 1+ bps/Hz
N0
!
P2 ||h2 ||2
R2 (1 ) log 1+ bps/Hz
(1 )N0
Bandwidth W = 1 Hz is divided into fraction and 1 for user-1 and user-2 respectively
!
P1 ||h1 ||2
R1 log 1+ bps/Hz
N0
!
P2 ||h2 ||2
R2 (1 ) log 1+ bps/Hz
(1 )N0
With Gaussian inputs x1 and x2 , above inequalities are met with equality
Bandwidth W = 1 Hz is divided into fraction and 1 for user-1 and user-2 respectively
!
P1 ||h1 ||2
R1 log 1+ bps/Hz
N0
!
P2 ||h2 ||2
R2 (1 ) log 1+ bps/Hz
(1 )N0
With Gaussian inputs x1 and x2 , above inequalities are met with equality
For multi-user channels, we are interested in studying trade off between R1 and R2
Bandwidth W = 1 Hz is divided into fraction and 1 for user-1 and user-2 respectively
!
P1 ||h1 ||2
R1 log 1+ bps/Hz
N0
!
P2 ||h2 ||2
R2 (1 ) log 1+ bps/Hz
(1 )N0
With Gaussian inputs x1 and x2 , above inequalities are met with equality
For multi-user channels, we are interested in studying trade off between R1 and R2
we have a rate region instead of a single rate number
Bandwidth W = 1 Hz is divided into fraction and 1 for user-1 and user-2 respectively
!
P1 ||h1 ||2
R1 log 1+ bps/Hz
N0
!
P2 ||h2 ||2
R2 (1 ) log 1+ bps/Hz
(1 )N0
With Gaussian inputs x1 and x2 , above inequalities are met with equality
For multi-user channels, we are interested in studying trade off between R1 and R2
we have a rate region instead of a single rate number
for two users, rate region is 2-dimensional
MIMO Wireless Communications (Rohit Budhiraja, IITK) Multi-user Communications 5
Multi-user uplink channel orthogonal access
We study the two-user rate region for orthogonal access
Orthogonal scheme is always inferior when compared with MAC capacity region
Orthogonal scheme is always inferior when compared with MAC capacity region
Orthogonal scheme does not use the available degrees of freedom optimally
Orthogonal scheme is always inferior when compared with MAC capacity region
Orthogonal scheme does not use the available degrees of freedom optimally
In each fraction of bandwidth W , we have nr 1 system
Orthogonal scheme is always inferior when compared with MAC capacity region
Orthogonal scheme does not use the available degrees of freedom optimally
In each fraction of bandwidth W , we have nr 1 system
Orthogonal scheme has only single degree of freedom
Orthogonal scheme is always inferior when compared with MAC capacity region
Orthogonal scheme does not use the available degrees of freedom optimally
In each fraction of bandwidth W , we have nr 1 system
Orthogonal scheme has only single degree of freedom
Current broadband systems employ orthogonal scheme
Orthogonal scheme is always inferior when compared with MAC capacity region
Orthogonal scheme does not use the available degrees of freedom optimally
In each fraction of bandwidth W , we have nr 1 system
Orthogonal scheme has only single degree of freedom
Current broadband systems employ orthogonal scheme
Both users accessing the channel simultaneously
Orthogonal scheme is always inferior when compared with MAC capacity region
Orthogonal scheme does not use the available degrees of freedom optimally
In each fraction of bandwidth W , we have nr 1 system
Orthogonal scheme has only single degree of freedom
Current broadband systems employ orthogonal scheme
Both users accessing the channel simultaneously
Provides two degrees of freedom
MIMO Wireless Communications (Rohit Budhiraja, IITK) Multi-user Communications 9
Multiple access channel 2-user capacity region
Orthogonal scheme is always inferior when compared with MAC capacity region
Orthogonal scheme does not use the available degrees of freedom optimally
In each fraction of bandwidth W , we have nr 1 system
Orthogonal scheme has only single degree of freedom
Current broadband systems employ orthogonal scheme
Both users accessing the channel simultaneously
Provides two degrees of freedom capacity optimal with MMSE-SIC receiver
MIMO Wireless Communications (Rohit Budhiraja, IITK) Multi-user Communications 9
Multiple access channel 2-user capacity region
Capacity region is given as
||h2 ||2
SINR2 = P2 (after cancelling the user-1 signal and by performing MRC)
N0
||h2 ||2
SINR2 = P2 (after cancelling the user-1 signal and by performing MRC)
N0
!
2
||h2 ||
R2 = log 1 + P2
N0
||h2 ||2
SINR2 = P2 (after cancelling the user-1 signal and by performing MRC)
N0
!
2
||h2 ||
R2 = log 1 + P2
N0
P1 h1 hH P2 h2 hH
We show that the sum of R1 and R2 derived above is equal to sum rate log Inr + N0
1 + N0
2