Sei sulla pagina 1di 220

Engineering Services

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/1

Engineering Services

Lean Manufacturing
A 6-day training program
Tailored for LEONI

Abdelghani A. Elimam
Lotfi K. Gaafar
The American University in Cairo

June-July 2006

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/2

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 1


Engineering Services

Course Objectives

The objective of this training program is


to introduce lean manufacturing and its
main requirements. Participants will
understand the lean manufacturing
approach and develop the skills to
successfully implement it. Participants
are expected to contribute to tailoring
case studies to their own environment.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/3

Course Outline

Overview of Lean Manufacturing


Waste Elimination
The TPM model
Quality Assurance
The Quality Link
The Toyota Production System
Lean Production Models
Implementation Tips

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/4

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 2


Engineering Services

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/5

What is Lean Manufacturing?

Lean production can be traced to the 1960s


in Japan, when Toyota Motors started
innovating changes in mass production to
deal with its domestic automotive market.

The term itself was coined by MIT


researchers to describe the collection of
efficiency improvements that Toyota Motors
undertook to survive in the Japanese
automobile business after World War II

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/6

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 3


Engineering Services

What is Lean Manufacturing?

Two of the authors of The Machine that


Changed the World (Womack and
Jones) define lean as doing "more and
more with less and less-less human
effort, less equipment, less time, and
less space-while coming closer and
closer to providing customers with
exactly what they want"

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/7

What is Lean Manufacturing?

Lean production is a term that embraces


many topics such as flexible manufacturing,
minimizing work-in-process, "pull" systems of
production control, and setup time reduction.

The term "lean production" was coined


around 1989 with the popularity of the book,
The Machine that Changed the World.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/8

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 4


Engineering Services

What is Lean Manufacturing?

According to another author of The


Machine that Changed the World, lean
production is based on four principles:
1. minimize waste
2. perfect first-time quality
3. flexible production lines
4. continuous improvement

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/9

Mass Production vs. Lean Production

Mass Production Lean Production


Inventory buffers Minimum waste
Just-in-case deliveries Minimum inventory
Just-in-time deliveries
Acceptable quality level (AQL) Perfect first-time quality
Taylorism Worker teams
Maximum efficiency Worker involvement
Flexible production systems
If it ain't broke, don't fix it Continuous improvement

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/10

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 5


Engineering Services

Lean Thinking roots in the Toyota Philosophy

Doing it all for the Multi-skilling


Customer TQM
Leveled production TPM
Pull system Poka Yoke
Continuous-flow SPC
production Standardized
work
Takt time
Kaizen

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/11

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/12

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 6


Engineering Services

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/13

What is Total Productive Maintenance ( TPM )?

Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) is a


maintenance program which involves a
newly defined concept for maintaining
plants and equipment. The goal of the
TPM program is to markedly increase
production while, at the same time,
increasing employee morale and job
satisfaction.
Total = Everyone
Productive = No Waste
Maintenance = As new

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/14 14

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 7


Engineering Services

Why TPM?
Avoid waste in a quickly changing
economic environment.
Produce goods without reducing
product quality.
Reduce cost.
Produce a low batch quantity at the
earliest possible time (JIT).
Goods send to the customers must be
non defective.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/15 15

TPM History
TPM is an innovative Japanese concept originating in 1951 with
preventive maintenance concepts taken from USA.
Nippondenso of the Toyota group was the first company to introduce
plant wide preventive maintenance in 1960.
Nippondenso added Autonomous maintenance done by production
operators.
The maintenance crew went in the equipment modification for
improving reliability. The modifications were made or incorporated in
new equipment. This led to maintenance prevention. Thus preventive
maintenance along with Maintenance prevention and Maintainability
Improvement gave birth to Productive Maintenance.
The aim of productive maintenance was to maximize plant and
equipment effectiveness to achieve optimum life cycle cost of
production equipment.
By then Nippondenso had made quality circles, involving the
employees participation. Thus all employees took part in
implementing Productive maintenance. Based on these developments
Nippondenso was awarded the distinguished plant prize for
developing and implementing TPM, by the Japanese Institute of Plant
Engineers ( JIPE ). Thus Nippondenso became the first company to
obtain the TPM certification.
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/16 16

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 8


Engineering Services

TPM Objectives

Achieve Zero Defects, Zero Breakdown


and Zero accidents in all functional
areas of the organization.
Involve people in all levels of
organization.
Form different teams to reduce defects
and achieve Self Maintenance

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/17 17

TPM Targets
Productivity
Obtain Minimum 80% OPE ( Overall
Plant Efficiency)
Obtain Minimum 90% OEE ( Overall
Equipment Efficiency)
Run the machines even during lunch.
(Lunch is for operators and not for
machines!)
Quality
No customer complaints
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/18 18

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 9


Engineering Services

TPM Targets
Cost
Reduce manufacturing cost by 30%
Delivery
100% on time delivery
Safety
Accident free environment
Morale
Increase suggestions 3 folds. Develop
Multi-skilled and flexible workers

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/19 19

Direct benefits of TPM


Increase productivity and OPE 1.5 or 2
times.
Rectify customer complaints.
Reduce manufacturing costs by 30%.
Satisfy customers needs 100 %
(Delivering the right quantity at the
right time, in the required quality.)
Reduce accidents.
Follow pollution control measures.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/20 20

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 10


Engineering Services

Indirect benefits of TPM


Higher confidence level among
employees.
Clean, neat and attractive work place.
Favorable change in the attitude of the
operators.
Achieving goals by working as team.
Horizontal deployment of a new
concept in all areas of the organization.
Knowledge and experience sharing.
Workers feel they own the machines.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/21 21

Pillars of TPM

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/22 22

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 11


Engineering Services

PILLAR 1 - 5S
Japanese Term English Translation Equivalent 'S' term

Seiri Organization Sort

Seiton Tidiness Systematize

Seiso Cleaning Sweep

Seiketsu Standardization Standardize

Shitsuke Discipline Self - Discipline

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/23 23

PILLAR 1 5S Sort
Priority Frequency of Use How to use

Less than once per year, Once Throw away, Store away
Low
per year from the workplace

At least 2/6 months, Once


Average Store together but offline
per month, Once per week

High Once Per Day Locate at the workplace

As a result of this step, the search time is reduced


Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/24 24

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 12


Engineering Services

PILLAR 1 - 5S
SEITON - Organize
The concept here is that "Each item has a
place, and only one place". The items should
be placed back after usage at the same place.
To identify items easily, name plates and
colored tags have to be used. Vertical racks
can be used for this purpose, and heavy
items occupy the bottom position in the
racks.
SEISO - Shine the workplace
This involves cleaning the work place free of
burrs, grease, oil, waste, scrap etc. No
loosely hanging wires or oil leakage from
machines.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/25 25

PILLAR 1 - 5S
SEIKETSU - Standardization
Employees have to discuss together and
decide on standards for keeping the work
place / Machines / pathways neat and clean.
These standards are implemented for whole
organization and are tested / inspected
randomly.

SHITSUKE - Self discipline


Considering 5S as a way of life and bring
about self-discipline among the employees of
the organization. This includes wearing
badges, following work procedures,
punctuality, dedication to the organization
etc.
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/26 26

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 13


Engineering Services

PILLAR 1 - 5S

To Sort To Straighten
Ensure space for
Eliminate whats each thing, and a
not absolutely thing for each space.
necessary No more searching.

To Sustain

Visual Control & Maintain


continuous
the Workstation effort. This is a
way of life. To Sweep
To Sanitize Maintain a clean
and orderly space to
Improvement of make problems
the workstation. easily identifiable.
Be organized to Eliminate rejects
reduce clutter. and scrap..

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/27 27

PILLAR 1 - 5S
Visual Control &
the Workstation
Ergonomics
Adapt the workstation to the
employee
- more security
- more comfort
Reduce waste
- excessive fatigue
- useless efforts and movement
- less physical constraints

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/28 28

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 14


Engineering Services

PILLAR 2-JISHU HOZEN ( Autonomous maintenance)


This pillar is geared towards developing operators to be
able to take care of small maintenance tasks, thus
freeing up the skilled maintenance people to spend time
on more value added activities and technical repairs.
The operators are responsible for upkeep of their
equipment to prevent it from deteriorating.
Policy
Uninterrupted operation of equipments.
Flexible operators to operate and maintain other
equipments.
Eliminating the defects at source through active
employee participation.
Stepwise implementation of JH activities.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/29 29

PILLAR 2-JISHU HOZEN ( Autonomous maintenance)


Steps in JISHU HOZEN :
Preparation of employees (training).
Initial cleanup of machines.
Take counter measures
Fix tentative JH standards
General inspection
Autonomous inspection
Standardization
Autonomous management

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/30 30

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 15


Engineering Services

PILLAR 2-JISHU HOZEN ( Autonomous maintenance)


Initial cleanup of machines
Supervisor and technician set a date for first cleaning
Arrange all items needed for cleaning
On the arranged date, employees should clean the equipment
completely with the help of maintenance department.
Dust, stains, oils and grease have to be removed.
Cleaning should cover:
Oil leakage, loose wires, unfastened nuts and bolts and worn out parts.
After clean up problems are categorized and suitably tagged.
White tags are placed where problems can be solved by operators.
Pink tags are placed where the aid of maintenance department is
needed.
Contents of tag is transferred to a register.
Inaccessible areas are noted
Finally close the open parts of the machine and run the machine

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/31 31

PILLAR 2-JISHU HOZEN ( Autonomous maintenance)


Counter Measures
Inaccessible regions must be reached easily. (e.g. If
there are many screw to open a fly wheel door, hinge
door can be used. Instead of opening a door for
inspecting the machine, acrylic sheets can be used.)
Machine parts should be modified to prevent
accumulation of dirt and dust.

Tentative Standard :
JH schedule has to be made and followed strictly.
Schedule should be made regarding cleaning,
inspection and lubrication and it also should include
details like when, what and how.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/32 32

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 16


Engineering Services

PILLAR 2-JISHU HOZEN ( Autonomous maintenance)


General Inspection
Employees are trained in disciplines like pneumatics, electrical,
hydraulics, lubricant and coolant, drives, bolts, nuts and Safety.
This is necessary to improve the technical skills of employees and to use
inspection manuals correctly.
After acquiring this new knowledge the employees should share this
with others.
By acquiring this new technical knowledge, the operators are now well
aware of machine parts.

Autonomous Inspection
New methods of cleaning and lubricating are used.
Each employee prepares his own autonomous chart / schedule in
consultation with supervisor.
Parts which have never given any problem or parts which don't need
any inspection are removed from list permanently based on experience.
Inspection that is made in preventive maintenance is included in JH.
The frequency of cleanup and inspection is reduced based on
experience.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/33 33

PILLAR 2-JISHU HOZEN ( Autonomous maintenance)


Standardization
Previous steps focused on machinery/equipment only.
In this step the surroundings of machinery are
organized, such that there is no searching or searching
time is reduced.
Work environment is modified such that there is no
difficulty in getting any item.
Everybody should follow the work instructions strictly.
Necessary spares for equipments is planned and
procured.

Autonomous Management :
OEE and OPE and other TPM targets must be achieved
by continuous improve through Kaizen.
PDCA ( Plan, Do, Check and Act ) cycle must be
implemented for Kaizen.
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/34 34

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 17


Engineering Services

PILLAR 3 - KOBETSU KAIZEN


"Kai" means change, and "Zen" means good (for the better)
Small improvements carried out on a continual basis.
Involve all people in the organization.
Kaizen is opposite to big spectacular innovations and
requires no or little investment.
A very large number of small improvements are more
effective in an organizational environment than a few
improvements of large value.
This pillar is aimed at reducing losses in the workplace that
affect efficiencies.
By using a detailed and thorough procedure we eliminate
losses in a systematic method using various Kaizen tools.
Not limited to production areas (Administrative areas as
well).

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/35 35

PILLAR 3 - KOBETSU KAIZEN


Kaizen Target :
Achieve and sustain zero loses with respect to minor
stops, measurement and adjustments, defects and
unavoidable downtimes. It also aims to achieve 30%
manufacturing cost reduction.

Kaizen Policy:
Practice concepts of zero losses in every sphere of
activity.
relentless pursuit to achieve cost reduction targets
in all resources
Relentless pursuit to improve over all plant
equipment effectiveness.
Extensive use of PM analysis as a tool for eliminating
losses.
Focus on easy handling by operators.
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/36 36

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 18


Engineering Services

PILLAR 3 - KOBETSU KAIZEN


Tools used in Kaizen
PM analysis
Why - Why analysis
Summary of losses
Kaizen register
Kaizen summary sheet

TPM aims at maximization of machine utilization and


not merely machine availability maximization. As
one of the pillars of TPM activities, Kaizen pursues
efficient equipment, operator and material and
energy utilization, that is extremes of productivity
and aims at achieving substantial effects. Kaizen
activities try to thoroughly eliminate 16 major losses

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/37 37

PILLAR 3 KOBETSU KAIZEN (Losses)


Losses that impede equipment efficiency

Failure losses - Breakdown loss


Setup / adjustment loss
Tool loss
Start up loss
Minor stoppage / Idling loss.
Speed loss - operating at low speeds.
Defect / rework loss
Scheduled downtime loss

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/38 38

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 19


Engineering Services

PILLAR 3 KOBETSU KAIZEN (Losses)


Loses that impede human work efficiency

Management loss
Operating motion loss
Line organization loss
Logistic loss
Measurement and adjustment loss

Losses that impede efficient use of production


resources

Energy loss
Die, jig and tool breakage loss
Yield loss

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/39 39

PILLAR 3 KAIZEN (Classification of losses)


Aspect Sporadic Loss Chronic Loss
Causes for this failure can This loss cannot be easily
be easily traced. Cause- identified and solved.
Causation
effect relationship is Even if various counter
simple to trace. measures are applied
This type of loss is caused
Easy to establish a remedial by hidden defects in
Remedy
measure machine, equipment and
methods.
A single cause is rare - a
Impact / Loss A single loss can be costly combination of causes
trends to be a rule
The frequency of
The frequency of loss is
Frequency of occurrence occurrence is low and
higher.
occasional.
Specialists in process
Usually the line personnel in engineering, quality
Corrective action the production can assurance and
attend to this problem. maintenance people are
required.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/40 40

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 20


Engineering Services

Elimination of Wastes and Continuous Improvement


The Approach The Means The Strategy
Elimination of One piece flow
wastes SMED Leadtime
Visual Controls
KAIZEN Workplace Costs
Organization
Kanban Quality the
Continuous Standard Work
Improvement First Time
Process Control
Total Productive
Maintenance
Poka-Yoke

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/41

PILLAR 4 - PLANNED MAINTENANCE


The objective is trouble free machines and
equipment producing defect free products for total
customer satisfaction.

Preventive Maintenance
Breakdown Maintenance
Corrective Maintenance
Maintenance Prevention

With Planned Maintenance we evolve our efforts


from a reactive to a proactive method and use
trained maintenance staff to help train the
operators to better maintain their equipment.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/42 42

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 21


Engineering Services

PILLAR 4 - PLANNED MAINTENANCE


Policy
Achieve and sustain availability of machines
Optimum maintenance cost.
Reduces spares inventory.
Improve reliability and maintainability of machines.

Targets
Zero equipment failure and breakdown.
Improve reliability and maintainability.
Reduce maintenance cost.
Ensure availability of spares all the time

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/43 43

PILLAR 4 - PLANNED MAINTENANCE


Six steps in Planned maintenance

1. Equipment evaluation and recording present status.


2. Restoring deterioration and improving weakness.
3. Building up information management system.
4. Preparing time based information system and
selecting equipment, parts and members and
mapping out plan.
5. Preparing predictive maintenance system by
introducing equipment diagnostic techniques.
6. Evaluation of planned maintenance.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/44 44

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 22


Engineering Services

PILLAR 5 - QUALITY MAINTENANCE


Focus is on eliminating non-conformances in a
systematic manner, much like Focused Improvement.
We gain understanding of what parts of the equipment
affect product quality and begin to eliminate current
quality concerns, then move to potential quality
concerns. Transition is from reactive to proactive
(Quality Control to Quality Assurance).

QM activities is to set equipment conditions that


preclude quality defects, based on the basic concept of
maintaining perfect equipment to maintain perfect
quality of products. The condition are checked and
measure in time series to verify that measure values
are within standard values to prevent defects. The
transition of measured values is watched to predict
possibilities of defects occurring and to take counter
measures before problems develop.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/45 45

PILLAR 5 - QUALITY MAINTENANCE


Policy
Defect free conditions and control of equipments.
QM activities to support quality assurance.
Focus on prevention of defects at source
Focus on poka-yoke. ( error proof system )
In-line detection and segregation of defects.
Effective implementation of operator quality
assurance.

Target
Achieve and sustain customer complaints at zero.
Reduce in-process defects.
Reduce cost of quality.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/46 46

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 23


Engineering Services

PILLAR 5 - QUALITY MAINTENANCE


Data requirements

Quality defects are classified as customer end


defects and in house defects. For customer-end
data, we have to get data on:

Customer end line rejection


Field complaints.
In-house, data include data related to products
and data related to process

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/47 47

PILLAR 5 - QUALITY MAINTENANCE


Data related to product:

Product wise defects


Severity of the defect and its contribution major/minor
Location of the defect with reference to the layout
Magnitude and frequency of its occurrence at each stage
Occurrence trend in beginning and the end of each
production/process/changes.
Occurrence trend with respect to restoration of
breakdown/modifications/periodical replacement of components.

Data related to processes:

The operating condition for individual sub-process related to men,


method, material and machine.
The standard settings/conditions of the sub-process
The actual record of the settings/conditions during the defect
occurrence.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/48 48

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 24


Engineering Services

PILLAR 6 - TRAINING
Aims at:

Multi-skilled revitalized employees whose morale is


high and who are eager to come to work and
perform all required functions effectively and
independently.
"Know-How" and "Know-why".
Four phases of skill:

Phase 1 : Do not know.


Phase 2 : Know the theory but cannot do.
Phase 3 : Can do but cannot teach.
Phase 4 : Can do and also teach.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/49 49

PILLAR 6 - TRAINING
Policy
Focus on improvement of knowledge, skills and
techniques.
Creating a training environment for self learning
based on felt needs.
Training curriculum / tools /assessment etc geared
to employee revitalization.
Training to remove employee fatigue and make work
enjoyable.

Target
Achieve and sustain downtime due to want at zero
on critical machines.
Achieve and sustain zero losses due to lack of
knowledge / skills / techniques.
Aim for 100 % participation in suggestion schemes.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/50 50

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 25


Engineering Services

PILLAR 6 - TRAINING
Steps in Educating and training activities

Setting policies and priorities and checking present


status of education and training.
Establishing a training system for operation and
maintenance skill upgrade.
Preparing a training calendar.
Kick-off of the system for training.
Training employees for upgrading the operation
and maintenance skills.
Evaluating activities and studying future changes.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/51 51

PILLAR 7 - OFFICE TPM

Office TPM should be started after activating four


other pillars of TPM (JH, KK, QM, PM). Office TPM
must be followed to improve productivity,
efficiency in the administrative functions and
identify and eliminate losses. This includes
analyzing processes and procedures towards
increased office automation.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/52 52

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 26


Engineering Services

PILLAR 7 - OFFICE TPM


Office TPM addresses twelve major losses:

Processing loss
Cost losses in areas including procurement,
accounts, marketing, and sales
Communication loss
Idle loss
Set-up loss
Accuracy loss
Office equipment breakdown
Communication channel breakdown
Time spent on retrieval of information
Non availability of correct online stock status
Customer complaints due to logistics
Expenses on emergency dispatches/purchases
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/53 53

PILLAR 7 - OFFICE TPM


Kobetsu Kaizen topics for Office TPM:

Inventory reduction
Lead time reduction of critical processes
Motion & space losses
Retrieval time reduction
Balancing the work load
Achieving zero breakdown of office equipment
like telephone and fax lines.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/54 54

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 27


Engineering Services

PILLAR 7 - OFFICE TPM


P Q C D S M in Office TPM

P Production output lost due to want of material, Manpower


productivity, Production output lost due to want of tools.

Q Mistakes in preparation of checks, bills, invoices, payroll,


Customer returns/warranty attributable to BOPs,
Rejection/rework in BOPs/job work, Office area rework.

C Buying cost/unit produced, Cost of logistics


inbound/outbound, Cost of carrying inventory, Cost of
communication.

D Logistics losses (Delay in loading/unloading)


Delay in delivery due to any of the support functions
Delay in payments to suppliers
Delay in information

S Safety in material handling/stores/logistics, Safety of soft and


hard data.

M Number of kaizens in office areas.


Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/55 55

PILLAR 7 - OFFICE TPM


Extension of office TPM to suppliers and distributors

This is essential, but only after we have done as


much as possible internally. With suppliers it will
lead to on-time delivery, improved in-coming
quality and cost reduction. With distributors it will
lead to accurate demand generation, improved
secondary distribution and reduction in damages
during storage and handling. In any case we will
have to teach them based on our experience and
practice and highlight gaps in the system which
affect both sides. In case of some of the larger
companies, they have started to support clusters
of suppliers.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/56 56

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 28


Engineering Services

PILLAR 7 - OFFICE TPM


Benefits of Office TPM

Involvement of all people in support functions for focusing on better


plant performance
Better utilized work area
Reduction of repetitive work
Reduction of inventory levels in all parts of the supply chain
Reduction of administrative costs
Reduction of inventory carrying costs
Reduction in number of files
Reduction of overhead costs (to include cost of non-production/non
capital equipment)
Productivity of people in support functions
Reduction in breakdown of office equipment
Reduction of customer complaints due to logistics
Reduction in expenses due to emergency dispatches/purchases
Reduced manpower
Clean and pleasant work environment.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/57 57

SMED

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/58 58

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 29


Engineering Services

SMED Principles
1. Separate internal setup from external
setup
2. Convert internal setup to external
setup
3. Streamline all aspects of setup
4. Perform setup activities in parallel or
eliminate them entirely

Based on information from Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/59

Reducing Setup Time


Preset desired settings
Use quick fasteners
Use locator pins
Prevent misalignments
Eliminate tools
Make movements easier

Based on information from Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/60

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 30


Engineering Services

SMED
Ultimately, SMED focuses on reducing changeover
and set-up times, thus enabling organizations to:

Produce smaller lots of products and services more


frequently.
Develop a broader scope of products and services.
Reduce quality defects towards zero.
Meet Customer Expectations.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/61

Benefits of SMED
Increased customer service levels and profits
Via Waste Elimination resulting in:
Reduced Lead Times-Faster Delivery
Zero Inventories-Reduced Working Capital
Improved Quality
Improved Safety
Smaller lots of products-flexibility
Diversified Product & Service Options

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/62

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 31


Engineering Services

Poka-Yoke
3.5 inch diskette cannot be inserted unless
diskette is oriented correctly. This is as far as
a disk can be inserted upside-down.

The beveled corner of the diskette pushes a


stop in the disk drive out of the way allowing
the diskette to be inserted. This feature, along
with the fact that the diskette is not square,
prohibit incorrect orientation.

From http://csob.berry.edu/faculty/jgrout/everyday.html

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/63 63

Poka-Yoke
File cabinets can fall over if too many
drawers are pulled out

For some file cabinets, opening one drawer


locks all the rest, reducing the chance of the
file cabinet tipping.

From http://csob.berry.edu/faculty/jgrout/everyday.html

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/64 64

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 32


Engineering Services

Poka-Yoke
Automobile controls have a mistake-proofing
device to insure that the key is in the on
position before allowing the driver to shift out
of park. The keys cannot be removed until
the car is in park.

Filling pipe insert keeps larger, leaded-fuel


nozzle from being inserted
gas cap tether does not allow the motorist to
drive off without the cap
gas cap is fitted with ratchet to signal proper
tightness and prevent over-tightening.

From http://csob.berry.edu/faculty/jgrout/everyday.html

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/65 65

Poka-Yoke
Electronic door locks can have three
mistake-proofing devices:
insures that no door is left unlocked.
doors automatically lock when the car
exceeds 18 miles an hour.
lock won't operate when door is open and the
engine is running.

Even bathroom sinks have a mistake-proofing


device. It is the little hole near the top of the
sink that helps prevent overflows.

From http://csob.berry.edu/faculty/jgrout/everyday.html

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/66 66

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 33


Engineering Services

Poka-Yoke
This iron turns off automatically when it is left
unattended or when it is returned to its holder

The dryer stops operating when the door is


opened, which prevents injuries.

From http://csob.berry.edu/faculty/jgrout/everyday.html

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/67 67

Poka-Yoke
This wall mounted hair dryer has two slots on
either side of the switch. (One slot is partially
covered by my thumb.) The bracket on the
wall has two pointed prongs that go through
the two slots and turn the dryer off if the user
neglected to do so.

The sink is fitted with light sensors. These


sensors insure that the water is turned off in
the sink (a urinal is flushed).

From http://csob.berry.edu/faculty/jgrout/everyday.html

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/68 68

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 34


Engineering Services

TPM Implementation- 12 steps


Announcement to introduce TPM
Introductory education campaign for the workforce
Preparation TPM Promotion (special committees)
Establish basic TPM policies and goals
Preparation and Formulation of a master plan

Kick-off Invite customers, affiliated companies and subcontractors


Develop an equipment management program
Develop a planned maintenance program
Implementation Develop an autonomous maintenance program
Increase skills of production and maintenance personnel
Develop early equipment management program

Stabilization Perfect TPM implementation and raise TPM levels

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/69

TPM Benefits
Increased equipment productivity
Reduced equipment downtime
Increased plant capacity
Lower maintenance and production
costs
Approaching zero equipment-caused
defects
Enhanced job satisfaction
Increased Return On Investment
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/70

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 35


Engineering Services

TPM Awards
Each year, JIPM offers TPM Awards to plants for exemplary TPM
achievements. The TPM Awards Committee, consisting of the
professors and JIPM experts, selects Award winners on the basis
of the Preliminary Assessment, Document Assessment and the
Final (On-site) Assessment. Award Categories are:

Award for World-Class TPM Achievement


Special Award for TPM Achievement
Award for Excellence in Consistent TPM Commitment-First
Category
Award for TPM Excellence-First Category
Award for Excellence in Consistent TPM Commitment-Second
Category
Award for TPM Excellence-Second Category

Eligibility, schedule and criteria, please contact award-


office@jipm.or.jp

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/71

Sources and Bibliography


www.plant-maintenance.com/index.shtml
Groover, M. P. 2001. Automation, Production Systems,
and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Second Edition,
Prentice Hall
http://www.ct-yankee.com/lean/smed.html#origin
http://www.maint2k.com/what-is-tpm.html
http://www.plant-
maintenance.com/articles/RCMvTPM.shtml
TPM for every operator by Japan institute of plant
maintenance
Autonomous Maintenance in seven steps - implementing
TPM on the shop floor by Masaji Tajiri and Fumio Gotoh
TPM New Implementation Program in Fabrication and
Assembly Industries, edited by Kunio Shirose, Japan
Institute of Plant Maintenance.
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/72 72

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 36


Engineering Services

Quality Assurance
and Management

This presentation uses information from Presentations by Dr. D. C. Montgomery

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/73

Main Topics
Quality assurance
The ISO 9000:2000 model for quality assurance and
management
Documentation and auditing
Total quality management
The 6 model for implementing total quality management
Quality Tools
process capability
Control charts

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/74

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 37


Engineering Services

Quality
"The totality of characteristics on an entity that bear on
its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs"
(ISO 8402: Quality - Vocabulary)

Conformance to stated (agreed) requirements


Doing the right things right the first time and every
time
Value for money
more features,
courteous service,
low purchase cost,
low after sale cost.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/75

Dimensions of Quality
Performance Aesthetics
Reliability Features
Durability Perceived Quality
Serviceability Conformance to
standards

Quality means fitness for use


- quality of design
- quality of conformance
Quality is inversely proportional to variability.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/76

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 38


Engineering Services

Dimensions of Quality
Quality is:
Defined as conformance to
requirements, not goodness.
Achieved through prevention, not
appraisal.
Measured by the price of
nonconformance, not indexes.

The quality performance standard is zero


defects, not acceptable quality levels
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/77

Quality Characteristics
Physical - length, weight, voltage, viscosity
Sensory - taste, appearance, color
Time Orientation - reliability, durability,
serviceability

Specifications
Quality characteristics being measured are
often compared to standards or specifications.
Nominal or target value
Upper Specification Limit (USL)
Lower Specification Limit (LSL)
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/78

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 39


Engineering Services

Quality and Variability

Quality improvement requires the reduction


of variability in processes and products

Sources of variability:
Processes
People
Equipment
Surroundings

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/79

Causes of Variation
What prevents perfection? Process variation...

Natural Causes Assignable Causes


Inherent to process Exogenous to process
Random Not random

Cannot be controlled Controllable

Cannot be prevented Preventable

Examples Examples
weather tool wear
accuracy of measurements Monday effect
capability of machine poor maintenance

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/80

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 40


Engineering Services

Quality Evolution

1. Inspection 5. Quality Planning


2. Quality Control 6. Quality Management
3. Quality Assurance 7. Total Quality
4. Quality Engineering Management
Three Important Leaders
W. Edwards Deming
- Emphasis on statistical methods in quality
improvement (14 points)
Joseph Juran
- Emphasis on managerial role in quality
implementation
Armand V. Feigenbaum
- Emphasis on organizational structure
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/81

Words of Wisdom
Demings Deadly Sins
Lack of Constancy
Concentration on Short-Term Profits
Over-reliance on Performance Appraisals
Job Hopping
Overemphasis on Visible Figures
Crosbys Absolutes for Quality Management
Quality is Conformance to Requirements, Not Goodness
Quality Systems Amount to Prevention
Zero Defects Define the Performance Standard
Measurement of Quality is the Price of Nonconformance

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/82

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 41


Engineering Services

A Brief History of Quality


Walter Shewhart (1924) introduced
statistical control chart concepts.
The American Society for Quality
Control formed in 1946 (now known
as the American Society for Quality
(ASQ)).
1950s and 1960s saw an increase in
reliability engineering, experimental
design, and statistical quality control
Competition from foreign industries
(Japan) increases during the 1970s
and 1980s.
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/83

A Brief History of Quality


Statistical methods for quality
improvement use increases in the United
States during the 1980s
Total Quality Management (TQM) emerges
during 1970s and into the 1980s as an
important management tool to implement
statistical methods.
Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Award
is established in 1988.
ISO 9000 certification activities increase
in U.S. industry in the 1990s.
Motorolas Six-Sigma initiative begins in
the late 1980s.
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/84

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 42


Engineering Services

Quality Costs
Quality Costs are those categories of costs
that are associated with producing,
identifying, avoiding, or repairing products
that do not meet requirements. These costs
are:

Prevention Costs
Appraisal Costs
Internal Failure Costs
External Failure Costs

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/85

Quality Costs

Prevention costs
Costs to prevent non-conformance "Make it right
the first time"
Quality planning and engineering
New products review
Product/process design
Process control
Burn-in
Quality data acquisition and analysis

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/86

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 43


Engineering Services

Quality Costs

Prevention costs (continued)

Technical support for vendors


Quality-certified suppliers
Integrated system development
Quality circles
Quality improvement projects
Preventive maintenance
Quality training of employees

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/87

Quality Costs
Appraisal costs
Costs to insure conformance to requirements and
standards
Inspection and test of incoming material

Inspection and test of products

Destructive tests

Calibration

Maintenance of test equipment and machines

Quality audits of products and processes

End of process sampling and processes testing

Field testing

Vendor audits and sample testing

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/88

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 44


Engineering Services

Quality Costs

Internal failure costs


Product failure before delivery costs
Scrap
Rework
Retest
Failure analysis
Downtime
Throughput losses
Downgrading

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/89

Quality Costs

External failure costs


Product failure after delivery costs
Customer complaint processing
Lost sales
Returned goods and replacements
Restoration of reputation
Investigation of defects
Warranty claims and adjustments
Product recalls
Product-liability settlements

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/90

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 45


Engineering Services

Quality Measures

Financial Measures of Quality


Total costs of quality as a percentage of net sales
Ratio of costs of conformance to total costs of quality
Ratio of costs of nonconformance to total costs of
quality
Costs of nonconformance as a percentage of new
sales

Non-Financial Measures of Quality


Product design quality.
Vendor performance.
Production performance.
Delivery cycle time.
Customer satisfaction.
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/91

Quality Tools: Tutorial


Quantitative data analysis
Run charts
Scatter Diagrams
Pareto charts
Histograms
Cause-and-Effect Diagrams
Sampling plans

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/92

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 46


Engineering Services

Variation- Why?

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/93

Variation- Types

Variables are either Random or systematic.


Variables may also be classified as attribute or numerical.
Attribute variables describe properties such as color or
quality.
Numerical variables may be classified as Discrete or
Continuous.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/94

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 47


Engineering Services

Random Variables
Their values cannot be predicted accurately.
Formally, a random variable is a function that assigns a real
number to each outcome in the sample space of a random
experiment.
Examples include:
The number of students passing an exam out of 25 students.
The time to the first failure of a computer which is known to
fail, on average, once a year.
The temperature on any given day.
The number of defective products from a production line.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/95

Discrete Random Variables


A random variable is discrete if its range is finite or
countably infinite.
Usually discrete random variables arise from counting.
Examples include:
The number of students passing an exam out of 25 students.
The number of defects on a product.
The number of defective products from a production line.
The number of typographical errors in a document.
The number of satisfied customers in a service facility.
The number of calls arriving at a switchboard in an hour.
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/96

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 48


Engineering Services

Continuous Random Variables


A random variable is continuous when it can take on values
on a continuous scale, i.e., when its range is uncountably
infinite.
Usually continuous random variables arise from measuring.
Examples include:
The temperature on any given day.
The time it takes to perform a certain task.
The deviation of a product from its nominal diameter.
Time between calls arriving at a switchboard in an hour.
The useful life of a light bulb.
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/97

Variables

Assume that we are in the business of producing bottled


water. We receive complaints that too many of our
bottles are cracked when they arrive to the customer.
How do we solve this problem?
Problem: too many cracked bottles (the variable)
Cause? (Sources of variation)
Solution? (Eliminate the root cause)

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/98

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 49


Engineering Services

Variables- The Root Cause

Fishbone/ Cause-and-Effect/ Ishikawa


Measurement Materials Methods

Main
Effect

Environment Manpower Machines


Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/99

Variables- The Root Cause

WIP Pressure Temperature

Measurement Materials Methods


Lab Error Raw materials Filling

Calibration Analyst Storage Supplier Speed Clamping


Pigment Molding
Parameters
Temperature
Storage Supplier Pressure
Cracked
Bottle
Maintenance Parameters
Controls Warm up
High Humidity
Inexperienced Blow
Sealing Machine
Ventilation
Tampering Blow Mold
with process
Power Interruption
Temperature
Uneven thickness
Environment Manpower Machines

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/100

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 50


Engineering Services

Variables- The Root Cause

Observing cracks and recording the frequency of each cause:


Cause Frequency
Bad raw materials 18
Contaminated raw materials 162
Inappropriate molding temperature 12
High molding pressure 18
High filling pressure 324
High filling speed 12
High claming force 30
Inadequate machine maintenance 6
High humidity 12
Others 6

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/101

Variables- The Root Cause


Pareto Chart for Cracked Bottles

600 100

500
80

400
Percent

60
Count

300
40
200

20
100

0 re ce 0
ls r atu an
re ria re pe te n
su m at e orc e r ia ls s su eed y t em main
re s f t e re p it g
gp r aw ing ma gp gs id
um mold
in ine he
rs
Defect ted la m ldin illin hh ch Ot
illin hc
aw hf ma
hf ina dr mo Hig priate te
Hig ntam Hig Ba
High Hig
ro qua
o p e
Count C
324 162 30 18 18 12 Ina p 12 Inad 12 6 6
Percent 54.0 27.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0
Cum % 54.0 81.0 86.0 89.0 92.0 94.0 96.0 98.0 99.0 100.0

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/102

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 51


Engineering Services

Variables- The Root Cause

What is the appropriate filling pressure?


Want higher pressure for faster operation
Want lower pressure for less interruptions
What affects the pressure?
Bottle material
Bottle condition
etc

How do we determine the optimum pressure?

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/103

Variables- The Root Cause

Try bottles until they crack


How many? Is one enough?
Under what conditions?
When?
Measurement techniques

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/104

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 52


Engineering Services

Variables- Data Collection

Try bottles until they crack


How many? Is one enough? Observe 60 bottles
Under what conditions? Different shifts, batches
When? Different times
Measurement techniques. Apply pressure until cracked

142 168 158 144 149 146 143 135 144 144
156 154 154 143 144 155 161 162 156 138
Results
155 149 159 151 154 166 139 137 143 147
144 147 164 165 124 155 151 164 166 151
143 158 158 166 156 156 141 143 155 165
134 153 157 150 140 139 164 146 160 139
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/105

Variables- Data Analysis


Which one of the 60 should we use?

142 168 158 144 149 146 143 135 144 144
156 154 154 143 144 155 161 162 156 138
155 149 159 151 154 166 139 137 143 147
154 147 164 165 124 155 151 164 166 151
143 158 158 166 156 156 141 143 155 165
134 153 157 150 140 139 164 146 160 139

Can we summarize the data?

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/106

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 53


Engineering Services

Data Analysis- Basic Concepts

Statistics

The goal of statistics is to study (quantify) random variation.

Observe the possible values of the random variable through a


planned experiment that is replicated until all possible sources of
variation are covered.

Population: all elements about which we wish to draw a


conclusion.

Sample: a subset of the population.

Numerical: counted or measured data.

Attribute: descriptive data.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/107

Data Analysis- Basic Concepts


Numerical Data Presentation

We summarize a large quantity of data numerically by calculating


measures of center and measures of variation (dispersion).

Measures of center include:

Mean: Arithmetic average


Median: Mid point or the data when ordered
Mode: The most frequent data point

Measures of variation include:

Range: The difference between the largest and smallest data points
Variance: The average square distance from the mean
Standard Deviation: The square root of the variance.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/108

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 54


Engineering Services

Data Analysis- Basic Concepts


Numerical Data Presentation
Measures of Center: Average

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/109

Data Analysis- Basic Concepts


Numerical Data Presentation
Measures of Center: Median

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/110

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 55


Engineering Services

Data Analysis- Basic Concepts


Numerical Data Presentation
Measures of Center: Mode

For our data:


Mean = 151, Median = 152, Mode = 143.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/111

Data Analysis- Basic Concepts


Numerical Data Presentation
Measures of Center: Are they enough?
Assume that we have data for another bottle brand:
166 138 143 155 154 183 167 165 159 205
126 148 162 123 131 121 143 135 124 159
162 165 169 135 159 120 164 148 110 133
157 127 199 139 155 161 83 146 167 169
138 156 146 175 143 133 119 143 155 177
148 146 160 167 166 172 168 161 164 148

Are these bottles better?

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/112

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 56


Engineering Services

Data Analysis- Basic Concepts


Numerical Data Presentation
Measures of Center
142 168 158 144 149 146 143 135 144 144
Original Brand: 156 154 154 143 144 155 161 162 156 138
155 149 159 151 154 166 139 137 143 147
Mean = 151, Median = 152, 154 147 164 165 124 155 151 164 166 151
Mode = 143 143 158 158 166 156 156 141 143 155 165
134 153 157 150 140 139 164 146 160 139

166 138 143 155 154 183 167 165 159 205
Alternative Brand: 126 148 162 123 131 121 143 135 124 159
Mean = 151, Median = 155, 162 165 169 135 159 120 164 148 110 133
Mode = 143 157 127 199 139 155 161 83 146 167 169
138 156 146 175 143 133 119 143 155 177
148 146 160 167 166 172 168 161 164 148

Which brand is better?


Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/113

Data Analysis- Basic Concepts


Numerical Data Presentation
Measures of Dispersion: Range

R = xmax - xmin
Advantages:
Easy to calculate
Same units as original data
Disadvantages:
Uses two data points only
Uses error-prone extreme data points

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/114

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 57


Engineering Services

Data Analysis- Basic Concepts


Numerical Data Presentation
Measures of Dispersion: Variance

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/115

Data Analysis- Basic Concepts


Numerical Data Presentation
Measures of variation
142 168 158 144 149 146 143 135 144 144
Original Brand: 156 154 154 143 144 155 161 162 156 138
155 149 159 151 154 166 139 137 143 147
Range = 44, Variance = 94.85 154 147 164 165 124 155 151 164 166 151
Standard deviation = 9.74 143 158 158 166 156 156 141 143 155 165
134 153 157 150 140 139 164 146 160 139

166 138 143 155 154 183 167 165 159 205
Alternative Brand: 126 148 162 123 131 121 143 135 124 159
Range = 122, Variance = 440.14 162 165 169 135 159 120 164 148 110 133
157 127 199 139 155 161 83 146 167 169
Standard deviation = 20.98 138 156 146 175 143 133 119 143 155 177
148 146 160 167 166 172 168 161 164 148

Which brand is better?


Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/116

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 58


Engineering Services

Data Analysis- Basic Concepts


Graphical Data Presentation
Stem-and-leaf
Exploratory technique to quickly displays data distribution.

Divide data into stem, consisting of one or more of the leading digits,
and leaf, consisting of the remaining digits. Record stems only once.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/117

Data Analysis- Basic Concepts


Graphical Data Presentation
Ordered Stem-and-leaf

Original

Ordered

Median and mode may be easily calculated


Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/118

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 59


Engineering Services

Data Analysis- Basic Concepts


Graphical Data Presentation
Back-to-Back Stem-and-leaf

Median and mode may be easily calculated


Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/119

Data Analysis- Basic Concepts


Graphical Data Presentation
Box Plot
Displays data variability and the central location.

The box extends from the first to the third quartiles. Lines
(whiskers) extend from the box to the minimum and maximum
or symmetric percentiles.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/120

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 60


Engineering Services

Data Analysis- Basic Concepts


Graphical Data Presentation
Box Plot

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/121

Data Analysis- Basic Concepts


Graphical Data Presentation
Histogram
Displays data distribution.

Divide data into c classes and record the frequency of data


in each class. Plot frequencies vs. classes.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/122

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 61


Engineering Services

Data Analysis- Basic Concepts


Graphical Data Presentation
Histogram

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/123

Probability and Statistics

In statistics, data are used to characterize the


random variable X, by defining a range over which
it varies, dividing that into suitable sub-ranges, and
finding the frequency of observing X in each sub-
range. We may also divide these frequencies by the
total number of observations to get the relative
frequency of observing X in each sub-range, or
equivalently, the probability of observing X in each
sub-range. This is where probability and statistics
combine together to address the goal of quantifying
random variation.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/124

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 62


Engineering Services

Data Analysis- Basic Concepts


Graphical Data Presentation
Dot Plot
A dotplot displays a dot for each observation along a number
line. If there are multiple occurrences of an observation, or if
observations are too close together, then dots will be stacked
vertically. The dotplot shows the data distribution.

Dotplot for original brand

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/125

Data Analysis- Basic Concepts


Graphical Data Presentation
Dot Plot

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/126

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 63


Engineering Services

Data Analysis- Basic Concepts


Are the data valid? 142 168 158 144 149 146 143 135 144 144
156 154 154 143 144 155 161 162 156 138
155 149 159 151 154 166 139 137 143 147
154 147 164 165 124 155 151 164 166 151
143 158 158 166 156 156 141 143 155 165
134 153 157 150 140 139 164 146 160 139
170

160
Pressure

150

140

130

120
10 20 30 40 50 60
Order

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/127

Data Analysis- Basic Concepts

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/128

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 64


Engineering Services

Data Analysis- Excel


Parameter Excel Function
Sample Average AVERAGE (number1, number2, ...)
Sample Median MEDIAN (number1, number2, ...)
Sample Mode MODE (number1, number2, ...)
Sample Maximum MAX (number1, number2, ...)
Sample Minimum MIN (number1, number2, ...)
Sample Variance VAR (number1, number2,...)
Sample Standard Deviation STDEV (number1, number2,...)
Forecasted Linear Value FORECAST (x, known_y's, known_x's)
Line Slope SLOPE (known_y's, known_x's)
Line Intercept INTERCEPT(known_y's, known_x's)

Histograms may be developed using a special Data


Analysis function under the Tools menu

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/129

The Normal Distribution

THE
NORMAL
LAW OF ERROR
STANDS OUT IN THE
EXPERIENCE OF MANKIND
AS ONE OF THE BROADEST
GENERALISATIONS OF NATURAL
PHILOSOPHY IT SERVES AS THE
GUIDING INSTRUMENT IN RESEARCHES
IN THE PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES AND
IN MEDICINE AGRICULTURE AND ENGINEERING
IT IS AN INDISPENSABLE TOOL FOR THE ANALYSIS AND THE
INTERPRETATION OF THE BASIC DATA OBTAINED BY OBSERVATION AND EXPERIMENT

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/130

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 65


Engineering Services

The Normal Distribution


The normal distribution
is an important
continuous distribution.
Symmetric, bell-
shaped
Mean,
Standard deviation,
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/131

The Normal Distribution

Histogram of height, with Normal Curve

300
Frequency

200

100

0
152 162 172

height

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/132

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 66


Engineering Services

The Normal Distribution

=2

=4 =4

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/133

The Normal Distribution

95%

2.5% 2.5%

-1.96 1.96
Z

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/134

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 67


Engineering Services

The Normal Distribution

For a population that is


normally distributed:
approx. 68% of the data
will lie within 1 standard
deviation of the mean;
approx. 95% of the data
will lie within 2 standard
deviations of the mean, and
approx. 99.7% of the data
will lie within 3 standard -4 -3 -2 -1 0

x
1 2 3 4

deviations of the mean.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/135

Quality Improvement
Quality improvement is the
reduction of variability in
processes and products.
Alternatively, quality
improvement is also seen as
waste reduction.

Effective quality improvement can be instrumental in


increasing productivity and reducing cost.
The cost of achieving quality improvements and increased
productivity is often negligible (quality is free).

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/136

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 68


Engineering Services

The Normal Distribution


Standard normal distribution
Z is normally distributed with mean 0
and standard deviation, 1.
Use the standard normal distribution

to find probabilities when the original


population or sample of interest is
normally distributed.
Tables, calculators, Excel are useful.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/137

The Normal Distribution


Example
The tensile strength of paper is modeled by a
normal distribution with a mean of 35 lbs/in2
and a standard deviation of 2 lbs/in2.
a) What is the probability that the tensile strength
of a sample is less than 40 lbs/in2?
b) If the specifications require the tensile strength
to exceed 30 lbs/in2, what proportion of the
samples is scrapped?

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/138

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 69


Engineering Services

Quality Assurance

The ISO 9000:2000 model for


quality assurance and
management
Documentation and auditing
Total quality management
The 6 model for implementing
total quality management

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/139

What is ISO 9000?

It is a family of standards developed to assist


organizations to implement and operate effective
Quality Management System (QMS)
ISO = International Organization for Standards
Prepared by ISO/TC 176
9000 = code to denote QMS Family
2000 = year of last revision

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/140

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 70


Engineering Services

ISO 9000:2000 Family


ISO 9000 - fundamentals, vocabulary
ISO 9001 - requirements
ISO 9004 - continual improvement guidelines
ISO 19011 - auditing guidelines

only ISO 9001 can be used for


certification purposes

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/141

ISO 9001:2000 Model

Continual
Continual Improvement
Improvementof
ofthe
theQMS
QMS
CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS

clause 4
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

info. flow management


management
responsibility
responsibility
clause 5
clause 6 clause 8
resource
resource meas,
meas,analysis
analysis info. flow
management
management improvement
improvement

clause 7
Input product
product Output
realization product
product
value adding realization value
activities
adding activities
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/142

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 71


Engineering Services

Key Quality Tools

Documentation Auditing

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/143

Why Document?

Accuracy

Repeatability

Consistency

Accountability

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/144

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 72


Engineering Services

Purpose
Purpose of documentation is to:
State quality policy and objectives
Describe organization, products, facilities
Inform employees and customers
Aid auditors
Refer to lower-level documents

DOCUMENTATION IS PRIMARILY DONE


FOR THE ORGANIZATION

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/145

Documentation Levels

Level
Policies I

ISO 9001 Level


Procedures II
Standards
(Department)

Level
Work Instructions III
(Job/Task)

Quality Records Level


External Documents IV
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/146

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 73


Engineering Services

Why Audit?
The organization shall continually improve the
effectiveness of the QMS through the use of:
management review
quality policy and objectives
analysis of performance data
preventive and corrective actions
regular internal and external audits
Clause 8.5.1

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/147

What is a QMS Audit?


An audit is the systematic investigation of:
the intent,
implementation, and
effectiveness
of selected aspects of the Quality
Management System of an organization or
department.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/148

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 74


Engineering Services

Corrective Action Flowchart

NCR/CAR Signs NCR/CAR NCR/CAR docs.


Identify
Identify Agree
Agreeononneed
need Propose
ProposeCA
CA
NC
NC for
forCA
CA program
program

int. audit report proc/WI/records


Verify
VerifyCA
CAbyby Implement
Implement Agree?
Agree? not
internal
internalaudit
audit CA
CA OK
OK

Verifies
VerifiesCA CAby:
by:
Notify
Notifyauditor
auditor visit
visitor
or
obj.
obj.evidence
evidence
Letter/fax
Audit report
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/149

Corrective versus Preventive Action

Corrective Preventive
Action Action
Action taken to Action taken to
eliminate cause of eliminate cause of
nonconformity potential nonconformity
Taken to prevent Taken to prevent
recurrence occurrence

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/150

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 75


Engineering Services

Audit: Common Deficiencies


Products/Materials
Inadequate identification
Unapproved material
Improper handling and storage
Inadequate shelf-life control
Quality status not clearly indicated
Extensive use of 'Use As Is" disposition
Non-conformance not identified
Packing inadequate to protect quality
People
Inadequate training
Lack of ISO requirements awareness
Non-compliance with existing procedures
Responsibilities not adequately defined and understood

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/151

Audit: Common Deficiencies


Sub-suppliers
list not approved or inadequate
Not selected based on quality
Inadequate requirements communication to
sub-suppliers
Documents
Unapproved documents
Procedures and practices don't match
Unofficial changes
Obsolete documents in use
Documents not located per distribution
Incomplete records and poor filing systems

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/152

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 76


Engineering Services

Audit: Common Deficiencies


Corrective Actions
Not determined or documented
Slow or not fully implemented
Not adequately verified

Processes
New processes not qualified
Calibration incomplete
Poor reaction to out of control conditions

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/153

Management Review
Follow-up on previous meeting
Complaints and customer surveys
Improvement initiatives
Performance data
Corrective actions
Competition situation
Training needs
Technology changes

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/154

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 77


Engineering Services

Just in Time (JIT)

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/155

The Japanese Approach to


Productivity

Imported technologies
Efforts concentrated on shop floor
Quality improvement focus
Respect for people
Elimination of waste

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/156

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 78


Engineering Services

Waste in Operations
(1) Waste from overproduction
(2) Waste of waiting time
(3) Transportation waste
(4) Inventory waste
(5) Processing waste
(6) Waste of motion
(7) Waste from product defects
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/157

Tools of Lean Manufacturing


Pull Systems / Kanban
A Tool for Implementing Pull Systems

Lean Production
Through Waste Elimination

Quality
JIT at the
People
Source

Operational Stability

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/158

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 79


Engineering Services

JIT Goals

Zero defects
Zero excess lot size or lot size of one
Zero setups
Zero breakdowns
Zero handling
Zero lead time
Zero Surging
Level production plan and uniform
product mix

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/159

Just-In-Time (JIT): Defined


JIT can be defined as an integrated set of
activities designed to achieve high-volume
production using minimal inventories (raw
materials, work in process, and finished
goods).

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/160

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 80


Engineering Services

NEED TO REDUCE COST

Traditional Method
(Push) Selling
Cost + Profit = Price
Seller Driven

(SELLER)

PROFIT (MARKET)
Modern Method
(Pull)
Customer Driven =
Selling
Price - Cost

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/161

Just in Time

History - Japan
1980s conclusion
Japanese industry worked smart - JIT
Think of JIT as minimum stock production

Type of relationship: close & intimate?


JIT
internal JIT - in client-server stream
external JIT

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/162

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 81


Engineering Services

Characteristics of JIT Vendor


Partnerships

Few, nearby suppliers


Long-term contract agreements
Steady supply rate
Frequent deliveries in small lots
Buyer helps suppliers meet quality
Suppliers use process control charts
Buyer schedules inbound freight

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/163

Japanese experience

Waste in operations from


overproduction
waiting time
transportation
inventory waste
processing
motion/movement
product defects
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/164

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 82


Engineering Services

Minimizing Waste: Inventory Hides Problems

identify defects from


Machine supplier early in the
downtime process saves the
Scrap
downstream work
Vendor
Work in delinquencies Change
orders
process
queues Engineering design Design
(banks) redundancies backlogs

identify defective
Decision
Paperwork Inspection
backlogs
work from upstream
backlog backlogs
stations, saves the
downstream work

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/165

166

From Aggregate to MPS to MRP1

Aggregate
MRP2
Plan (product groups)

Firm Forecast
orders random
Master orders
production
schedule
Design Time-phased plan
(MPS)
changes how many + when we
will build each end item.
Bill of
material MRP1
Inventory
record
JIT
Reports Stock
movements

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/166

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 83


Engineering Services

Just-In-Time (JIT)
System for high-volume production with min.
inventory (raw materials, WIP, finished goods).
Involves
timed arrivals @ workstation JIT

reduced buffer stocks

no waste in production system

a Pull system thru the plant

A management philosophy
Expose problems & bottlenecks
Take away security blanket
Streamlined production
Factory & warehouse networks

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/167

Just-In-Time (JIT)
a system for high-volume production with
minimal inventory (raw materials, WIP, finished
goods).
involves
timed arrivals @ workstation JIT

reduced buffer stocks Requires


no waste in production system
participation
a Pull system thru the plant engineering/basics
industrial
a management philosophy continuing improvement
TQM
expose problems & bottlenecks
reducing set up times
Take away security blanket
smaller lot/order sizes sizes
streamlined production stable environment
supply partnership
factory & warehouse networks

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/168

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 84


Engineering Services

JIT Requirements:
Design Flow Process: Link
operations, balance workstation
capacities, relayout for flow,
emphasize preventive maintenance,
reduce lot sizes, reduce
setup/changeover time

Total Quality Control: Worker


responsibility, measure SQC, enforce
compliance, fail-safe methods,
automatic inspection
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/169

JIT Requirements 1
Kanban Pull
Demand pull
Back flush
Reduce batch/lot sizes
Work with suppliers
Reduce lead times
Frequent deliveries
Project usage requirements
Quality expectations
Reduce inventory in
Stores
Transit
Conveyors
calculation from MRP & EOQs
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/170

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 85


Engineering Services

JIT Requirements 2
Quality
Worker responsibility Stabilize Schedule
SQC Level schedule
Enforce compliance Under utilize capacity
Error proof
Automatic inspection

People Focus
Operations Design
Link operations
pay harmonization
Balance workstation capacities supportive unions
Review layout for flow subcontractor networks
Stress preventive maintenance hands-on manager style
Reduce lot sizes quality commitment &
Reduce setup/changeover time group involvement

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/171

JIT Requirements 3
Problem-solving
Problem-solving
Rootproblem
Root problem
Long-term solution
Long-term solution
Teamcontribution
Team contribution
Line-specialistcooperation
Line-specialist cooperation
Learning
Learning
Measureperformance
Measure performance
CQI
CQI
Monitor&&report
Monitor report Product Design
Improvement
DFM & process design
Modules & fewer parts
Quality standards
upgrade housekeeping
clarify process flows
revise equipment &
process technologies
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/172

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 86


Engineering Services

JIT and Demand-Pull

Call (Kanban) & Pull

Call (Kanban) & Pull


Supplier Call (Kanban) & Pull
Fabric
Supplier Subass
Fabric Final
Subass Assembl Customer
Supplier Fabric
y
Supplier Fabric

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/173

Client Server Streaming


Avoid too much material stocks & WIP
Increase materials coordination/movement
Bin
Saw Call Supplier's
Materials
for local
warehouse
Bin more warehouse

Call
for
Finished
more
Goods
Bin Warehous
Bin
e
Lathe Grinder
Bin JIT
Bin deliveries
Customer
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/174

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 87


Engineering Services

What is a kanban?
developed at Toyota 1950s to manage line
material flows.
Kanban ( Kan=card, Ban= signal )
simple movement system
cards to signal & communicate
reorder information
boxes/containers to take lots of parts
from one work station to another
(client-server).
Server only delivers components to client
work station as & when needed
(called/pulled).
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/175

What is kanban?

minimize production area storage.


Workstations only produce/deliver
components when called (they
receive card + empty container).
The work-station produces enough
to fill the container
Kanban = an authorization to
produce more inventory
Limit inventory amount in process.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/176

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 88


Engineering Services

BENEFITS OF KANBAN

An information network used to control


production quantities
A communication process that controls
the movement of material
A cost reduction (waste elimination) tool
that prevents over production
A quality control enforcer because it limits
lot quantities to small amounts, thereby
allowing defects to be identified early in
the manufacturing process

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/177

BENEFITS OF KANBAN (cont.)


Manages just-in-time production
Gives specific part number, quantity,
location, and time demands to lower work
centers
Identify excess in plant inventory levels
Identify potential inventory shortages (low
stock indicators)
Limits quality rejects by
reducing lot size produced

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/178

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 89


Engineering Services

KANBAN PRE-CONDITIONS

Point of use
inclusion (all parts Level production
on the assembly line)
There are four
pre-conditions for
the successful
implementation of
Kanban

Quick Changeover Stabilized processes


procedures

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/179

KANBAN

Market Address Kanban Number Line-Side Address

<<Market_Address>> <<KAN>> <<Line_Side_Address>>

Part Number Route

<<Part Number>> <<Route>>

Bar Code Area


Part Description Dock Code
<<Part Number>> <<Dock Code>>
Supplier Code Quantity Serial Number

<<Supplier Code >> <<Quantity>>


Comment:
<<Comment>>

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/180

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 90


Engineering Services

What does a Kanban card look like?

Kanban No. 5678990


part No: 66789X
description 16ga. Copper Wire accurate
accurate data:
data: correct
correct part
part #s,
#s,
units Ft. quantities
quantities & & measurements
measurements
reorder/lot qty 20 visible
visible -- chart
chart if
if material
material ordered
ordered
store location Row 12, Bin 6 &
& when
when
supplier BICC fool
fool proof
proof for
for no
no stock
stock outs
outs
supplier tel 0208-
0208-891-
891-0121 minimum
minimum inventory
inventory
supplier part RT45502 clear
clear & & complete
complete info.
info. to
to suppliers
suppliers
routing process link
link inventory
inventory directly
directly to
to demand
demand
Name/location of next process Tie
Tie in
in with
with POP:
POP: issuing
issuing orders,
orders,
Name/location of preceding receiving
receiving & & authorizing
authorizing accounts
accounts
process payable
payable
container type & capacity
number of containers released

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/181

Function of Kanban

Helps to reduce moving defects from one area


to the next know preceding processes.
Provides pick-up and/or transportation
information: where from and where to
locations. In some cases, indicate schedule
times for pick-up.
Communicates production information: what
to produce and how many are required.
Kanban must be produced in the order
received.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/182

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 91


Engineering Services

Function of Kanban
Prevents overproduction and excessive
transportation -restricting in-bound raw
material and production quantity of a
process to specific pre-determined lot
quantity indicated on the KB. It allows
ordering of multiple lot quantities only to the
extent of KB available to be replenished
Serves as a work order indicating what has
been produced and identifies the physical
product
Reveals existing production problems and
maintains inventory control

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/183

Rules of Kanban
Never send defectives products to
downstream processes
The downstream process draws only what is
required by the KB from upstream processes.
The upstream process produces items in the
quantity and sequence indicated by the KB.
Parts are never to be produced or conveyed
without a KB
KB must be attached to actual containers of
parts
KB is a tool to fine tune production
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/184

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 92


Engineering Services

Kanban (KB) Rules


Rule 1: Subsequent process should withdraw
products from the preceding process in the
necessary quantities at the necessary point
in time.
any withdrawal without a KB should be
prohibited
Any withdrawal > # of KB should be
prohibited
A KB should always be attached to the
physical product

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/185

Kanban (KB) Rules


Rule 2: Preceding process should produce
in the quantities withdrawn by the
subsequent process
Production > # of KB sheets must be
prohibited
When various parts are to be produced in
the preceding process , their production
should follow the original sequence in
which each kind of KB has been delivered

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/186

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 93


Engineering Services

Kanban (KB) Rules


Rule 3: Defective products should
never be convened to the subsequent
process should withdraw

Rule 4: The number of Kanbans should


be minimized

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/187

Kanban (KB) Rules


Rule 5: KB should be used to adapt to
small fluctuations in demand
Fine-tuned production
Demand variation by about 10 % Can
be handled by changing only the
frequency of KB transfers without
revising the number of KB

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/188

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 94


Engineering Services

INTER-PROCESS KANBAN FLOW


Market Place
D F
2 B D F
A B C D E F
A B C D E F
A B C D E F

3
4
Assembly Withdraw Post Office
Kanban Mailbox
Inter-Process

1
V1 A Kanban Post Office
5
X B
V2 B A C E
B A C E

V3 Y
C

D
V4 D
D
D
V5 Z E A C E
A C E
f
V6 fF
F

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/189

Minimizing Waste: Kanban Control System

withdrawal kanban

Bin Bin
Machine Part A Part A Assembly
Center
Line

production Material Flow


kanban
Card (signal) Flow

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/190

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 95


Engineering Services

How many Kanbans?


Each container = minimum replenishment lot size.
Compute lead time required to produce a
"container"
Expected demand during lead time + safety stock
k=
capacity of container
dL(1 + S)
=
C
k = No. of kanbans in card set
d = Average No. of units demanded over the period
L = lead time to replenish order (same time units as
demand)
S = Safety stock as % of demand during lead time
C = Container size

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/191

Example
A switch is assembled in batches of 4 units
at an upstream work area.
delivered in a bin to a downstream
control-panel assembly area that requires 5
switch assemblies/hour.
The switch assembly area can produce a bin
of switch assemblies in 2 hours.
Safety stock = 10% of needed inventory.
Expected demand during lead time + safety stock
k=
size of container

dL (1+S) 5(2)(1.1)
= = = 2.75 or 3
C 4
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/192

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 96


Engineering Services

"Re-engineering" & Kanban


Modern production methods
1. Modular/cell production 9 group technology).
2. Reduce set up, lead and waiting times
between procedures.
3. Flow-of-products-oriented layout of
processes & machines layout. Products flow
smoothly from start to finish, parts do not sit
waiting to be worked on, forklift trucks do not
travel kilometers to move parts from one area
of the plant to another.
4. Flexible manufacturing of mixed models

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/193

"Re-engineering" & Kanban


Modern production methods
5. Theory of Constraints - drum-rope-buffer
(Goldratt). Building in extra redundancy.
6. Total Preventive Maintenance, prevent
machines from breaking down or
malfunctioning during production time
7. Team-Work & Autonomation (decision by
worker to stop line)
8. Kaizen: Continuous improvement
9. Housekeeping

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/194

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 97


Engineering Services

Characteristics of Lean Systems

Pull method of materials flow


Consistent quality
Small lot sizes
Uniform workstation loads
Standardized components and
work methods
Close supplier ties
Flexible workforce
Line flows
Automation
Preventive maintenance
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/195

Single-Card Kanban System


Receiving post
Kanban card for Storage
product 1 area
Kanban card for
product 2

Empty containers

Assembly line 1

O2

Fabrication
cell
O1 O3
Assembly line 2

Full containers
O2

Figure 11.2

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/196

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 98


Engineering Services

Single-Card Kanban System


Receiving post
Kanban card for Storage
product 1 area
Kanban card for
product 2

Empty containers

Assembly line 1

O2

Fabrication
cell
O1 O3
Assembly line 2

Full containers
O2

Figure 11.2

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/197

Single-Card Kanban System


Receiving post
Kanban card for Storage
product 1 area
Kanban card for
product 2

Empty containers

Assembly line 1

O2

Fabrication
cell
O1 O3
Assembly line 2

Full containers
O2

Figure 11.2

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/198

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 99


Engineering Services

Single-Card Kanban System


Receiving post
Kanban card for Storage
product 1 area
Kanban card for
product 2

Empty containers

Assembly line 1

O2

Fabrication
cell
O1 O3
Assembly line 2

Full containers
O2

Figure 11.2

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/199

Single-Card Kanban System


Receiving post
Kanban card for Storage
product 1 area
Kanban card for
product 2

Empty containers

Assembly line 1

O2

Fabrication
cell
O1 O3
Assembly line 2

Full containers
O2

Figure 11.2

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/200

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 100


Engineering Services

Single-Card Kanban System


Receiving post
Kanban card for Storage
product 1 area
Kanban card for
product 2

Empty containers

Assembly line 1

O2

Fabrication
cell
O1 O3
Assembly line 2

Full containers
O2

Figure 11.2

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/201

Single-Card Kanban System


Receiving post
Kanban card for Storage
product 1 area
Kanban card for
product 2

Empty containers

Assembly line 1

O2

Fabrication
cell
O1 O3
Assembly line 2

Full containers
O2

Figure 11.2

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/202

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 101


Engineering Services

Single-Card Kanban System


9 Each container must have a card
Customer:

Supplier:

Lot Quantity:

Location:

Part Number:
9 Assembly always withdraws from
fabrication (pull system)

KANBAN
9 Containers cannot be moved
without a kanban
9 Containers should contain the
same number of parts
WS 116

Aisle 5
Bin 47
WS 83

1234567Z
9 Only good parts are passed along
9 Production should not exceed
authorization
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/203

Operational Benefits
Reduce space requirements
Reduce inventory investment
Reduce lead times
Increase labor productivity
Increase equipment utilization
Reduce paperwork and simplify
planning systems
Valid priorities for scheduling
Workforce participation
Increase service/product quality
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/204

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 102


Engineering Services

Assembly Line Balancing

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/205

Assembly Line Balancing


DESIGNING ASSEMBLY LINES

1. How are work elements to be assigned to work


stations?
2. Buffer Inventory or not?
If Yes
How much?
Which stations?
3. How should the line be operated?
fixed
floating
semi-fixed
4. Should parallel work stations be set up?
5. What cycle time should be employed?
demand, no. of hours worked
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/206

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 103


Engineering Services

Assembly Line Balancing


DATA REQUIRED

1. WORK ELEMENTS
2. ELEMENT TIMES
3. PRECEDENCE RELATIONSHIPS
4. DEMAND (OUTPUT RATE)
or
NUMBER OF WORK STATIONS

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/207

Assembly Line Balancing


DEFINITIONS
Element (i) i = 1, 2, , I
Station (k) k = 1, 2, , K
Element Times (ai)
Station Time (ak)

Time to complete the elements in


station (k) for one unit.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/208

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 104


Engineering Services

Assembly Line Balancing


STATION DELAY (dk) per cycle.

ASSEMBLY LINE CYCLE TIME

T Total Production Time


C= =
q Required Output Rate

Sometimes called CMax

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/209

Assembly Line Balancing


CONDITIONS
ak C for k = 1, 2, , k

n k

i=1
ai = ak KC
k=1

for delay time to be a minimum

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/210

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 105


Engineering Services

Assembly Line Balancing

Useful for designing assembly layouts, for


processing a number of different products.
The number of workers and assembly
stations is fixed
The line is flexible for assembling
whatever product may be scheduled.
The workers will switch from one product
to another depending on the production
schedule.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/211

Assembly Line Balancing


Objective:
Minimize total delay time per cycle,
by manipulating the cycle time, C,
within a given number of stations.

K K
Min
k=1
dk = K (Max ak) - ak
k=1

(Convergence Procedure)

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/212

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 106


Engineering Services

Example Assembly Line Balancing

Element i Time ai Precedence


1 1.0 min/pc -
2 0.6 min/pc 1
3 2.7 min/pc 2
4 1.2 min/pc 2
5 3.4 min/pc 4
6 0.9 min/pc 3
7 1.6 min/pc -
8 1.1 min/pc 5,6,7

I
a = 12.5
Production Volume
i=1 i q = 1300/Week
2 Shifts/day
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/213

Assembly Line Balancing


4 5

1 2 3 6 8

The assembly line operates a day and an evening shift.


Find the optimum assembly line balance.
Following the steps suggested in the solution
procedure as follows:
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/214

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 107


Engineering Services

Assembly Line Balancing

1. Establish data--All the required data are stated:


the times for all elements, the precedence
requirements, and the production volume
required for a given time interval.

2. Make preliminary calculations of c, km, and cm--


These computations are helpful in establishing a
good initial feasible solution. Calculate c, Km
and Cm as follows:

(80 hr/week)(60 min/hr)


C= = 3.7 minutes/cycles; = Cmax
1,300 pcs/week

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/215

I
a
i=1 i
Km = 12.5 min/piece = 3.4 stations or 4 stations
= c 3.7 min/piece

I

i=1
ai
Cm = = 12.5 min/piece
Km 4 stations

= 3.12 minuets/cycle with 4 stations = Cmin

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/216

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 108


Engineering Services

Assembly Line Balancing


The computation shows: production
volume requires a minimum of four
stations. If these four stations could be
perfectly balanced, they could assemble

(80 hr/week)(60 min/hr)


= 1,540 cycles/week or 1,540 pieces/week
3.12 min/cycle

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/217

Assembly Line Balancing


Devise a feasible arrangement--In order to
start the convergence, it is necessary to
intuitively devise an initial feasible solution to
the problem.
Depending upon the analyst ability, he may
make the solution difficult by choosing a poor
good feasible solution. For large problems
considerable computation time can be saved
by trying intuitive means to approach the
optimum
Example: Propose following feasible solution
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/218

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 109


Engineering Services

Assembly Line Balancing


Feasible Solution
Check Max
k=1 k=2 k=3 k=4 Sum dk dk
a1=1.0
a =1.2 a =0.9 a8=1.1
a2=0.6 a4=3.4 a6=1.6
5 7
a3=2.7 Max 4.6 2.5 min 1.1 12.5 3.5 5.9
4.3

Select max ak min ak 4.6-4.3=.3


4.6-4.6=0
4.6-2.5=2.1
max dk = max ak = min ak 4.6-1.1=3.5
K 5.9
= 3.5
dK
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/219

Assembly Line Balancing


BETTER SOLUTION
Check Max
K=1 K=2 K=3 K=4 Sum dk dk
q1= q3= q5= q6=
q2= q7=
qr= q8= 12.5 0.9 1.9

COMMENTS

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/220

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 110


Engineering Services

Assembly Line Balancing


Practice Problem
Given the following information concerning the
assembly of an item:

Element No. Element Time Immediate Predecessor


1 15 sec. --
2 10 sec. 1
3 40 sec. 1
4 20 sec. 2,3
5 10 sec. 4
6 5 sec. 5

Required Output: 240,000 items/year


Production Time Available: 2000 hrs/year

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/221

Assembly Line Balancing


What can you conclude concerning the design of
an assembly line?

1 (2000 hrs/yr)(60 min/hr) (60 sec./min) =


. 7,200,000 sec/yr.
2 7,200,000sec/yr= 30 sec/item = Max. Cycle Time
. 240,000 item/yr

3 Total Element Times = 100 sec.


.
4 Element #3 is 40 sec > Cycle Time (max)
. Therefore need 2 parallel stations here
(or cut element in half)

5 100 sec/30 sec = 4 stations?


.
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/222

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 111


Engineering Services

Material handling for lean


manufacturing

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/223

MATERIAL HANDLING (MH)

Twenty principles of MH
Selecting MH methods
Simplifying /eliminating MH
Simple analysis techniques

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/224

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 112


Engineering Services

Material Handling

MH adds COST, but not VALUE.


as much as 60% of total production cost

20%-30% of direct labor costs

50%-70% of indirect labor costs

Whats the best way to handle materials?


DONT!!
Goal: MINIMIZE MH COSTS

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/225

Muthers Material Handling Equation

Yes
WHY WHAT WHERE + WHEN HOW + WHO
?

No MATL MOVE METHOD

Q A
etc. D

P E
C

Type, Sink, Source Flow; Unit


Qty, Direction Flow, Volume Manpower
Characteristics Type of Move, etc. Equipment

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/226

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 113


Engineering Services

Muthers Material Handling Equation

Use to analyze flow within and


between:
Receiving
Storage
Production
Warehousing
Shipping

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/227

The Twenty Principles of Material Handling

1. Orientation Principle: Study system relationships


before preliminary planning to identify existing
methods/problems, physical/economic constraints,
and establish future requirements/ goals.

2. Planning Principle: Establish a plan for basic


requirements, desirable options, and consideration
of contingencies for all MH/storage activities.

3. Systems Principle: Integrate those


handling/storage activities - economically viable-
into a coordinated operations: receiving,
inspection, storage, production, assembly,
packaging, warehousing, shipping /transportation.
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/228

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 114


Engineering Services

The Twenty Principles of Material Handling

4. Unit Load Principle: as large a unit load as practical.


5. Space Utilization Principle: effective space utilization.
6. Standardization Principle: Standardize handling
methods and equipment if possible.
7. Ergonomic Principle: Recognize human capabilities
and limitations by designing MH equipment and
procedures for effective interaction with system users.
8. Energy Principle: Include energy consumption of the
MH systems and procedures when making
comparisons or preparing economic justification.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/229

The Twenty Principles of Material Handling

9. Ecology Principle: Minimize adverse affects on


environment in selecting MH equipment/methods.
10. Mechanization Principle: Mechanize handling
process where feasible to increase efficiency/
economy in MH.
11. Flexibility Principle: Use methods/equipment
which can perform a variety of tasks under a
variety of operating conditions.
12. Simplification Principle: Simplify handling by
eliminating, reducing, or combining unnecessary
movements and/or equipment.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/230

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 115


Engineering Services

The Twenty Principles of Material Handling

13. Gravity Principle: Utilize gravity to move material


wherever possible, while respecting limitations
concerning safety, product damage and loss.
14. Safety Principle: Provide safe MH equipment and
methods which follow existing safety codes and
regulations in addition to gained experience.
15. Computerization Principle: Consider
computerization in MH & S systems, when
circumstances warrant, for improved
material/information control.
16. System Flow Principle: Integrate data flow with
physical material flow in handling and storage.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/231

The Twenty Principles of Material Handling

17. Layout Principle: Prepare an operational


sequence and equipment layout for all viable
system solutions, then select the alternative
system which best integrates efficiency and
effectiveness.

18. Cost Principle: Compare the economic


justification of alternate solutions in equipment
and methods on the basis of economic
effectiveness as measured by expense per unit
handled.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/232

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 116


Engineering Services

The Twenty Principles of Material Handling

19. Maintenance Principle: Prepare a plan for PM


and scheduled repairs on all material handling
equipment.

20. Obsolescence Principle: Prepare long range/


economically sound policy for replacement of
obsolete equipment/methods with special
consideration to life cycle costs.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/233

Unit Load Principle

Follows traditional thinking

$/unit

Quantity
The greater the amount moved per trip,
the less the cost per unit moved

Maximize Unit Load


Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/234

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 117


Engineering Services

Unit Load Principle

But:
Creates more inventory
Requires expensive, heavy-duty material
handling equipment
Increases lag time between operations
poor process communication, slower
reaction to quality problems
Requires more floor space

WASTE!
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/235

Selecting Material Handling Methods

Systematic Approach

1. Define the problem

Preliminary Survey Check sheet

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/236

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 118


Engineering Services

Selecting Material Handling Methods

2. Analyze the problem


Observe activities
Obtain layouts, flow patters, schedules, etc.
Obtain information on existing material handling
equipment
Analyze situation by material handling equation,
Twenty Principles of Material Handling, and/or
forms
such as Basic Data Form
Can activities be combined, simplified, eliminated?

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/237

Selecting Material Handling Methods

3. Identify possible solutions


Organize meeting with:
material handlers
machine operators
supervisors
support engineers

4. Evaluate alternatives
Meet again to rate alternatives using Factor
Analysis

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/238

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 119


Engineering Services

Improvement of MH Systems

Cellular Manufacturing
Eliminate Handling
Eliminate Storage
Eliminate Inventory
Eliminate waste due to poor quality
KEYS:
Efficient layout, scheduling, problem
prevention

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/239

Conveyor Systems

Reduce handling costs


Better coordination of product thru processes
Design WIP level into material handling system
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/240

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 120


Engineering Services

Simple Analysis Techniques

Queuing Analysis

Mathematical analysis of queues


(waiting lines: occur whenever current
demand for service > current capacity
to provide that service).

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/241

Simple Analysis Techniques

Queuing Analysis
Suitable for quick and dirty evaluations when
a high degree of detail is not necessary.
System

Arrivals Server (s) Departure

Arrival Rate Service Rate


Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/242

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 121


Engineering Services

Simple Systems

FIFO (FCFS)
Single Server, Single Queue - M/M/1
System
Poisson Arrivals
Exponential Service Times

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/243

Waiting Line Models


Customer
population

Figure C.1

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/244

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 122


Engineering Services

Waiting Line Models


Customer
population

Service system

Waiting line
Service
facilities
Priority
rule

Figure C.1

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/245

Waiting Line Models


Customer
population

Service system

Waiting line
Service Served
facilities customers
Priority
rule

Figure C.1

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/246

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 123


Engineering Services

Waiting
Line Arrangements

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/247

Service facilities

Waiting
Line Arrangements

(a) Single line

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/248

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 124


Engineering Services

Service facilities
Waiting
Line
Arrangements

(a) Single line


Service facilities

(b) Multiple lines

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/249

Service Facility Arrangements

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/250

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 125


Engineering Services

Service Facility Arrangements

Service
facility

(a) Single channel, single phase

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/251

Service Facility Arrangements

Service Service
facility 1 facility 2

(b) Single channel, multiple phase

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/252

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 126


Engineering Services

Service Facility Arrangements

Service
facility 1

Service
facility 2

(c) Multiple channel, single phase

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/253

Service Facility Arrangements

Service Service
facility 1 facility 3

Service Service
facility 2 facility 4

(d) Multiple channel, multiple phase

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/254

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 127


Engineering Services

Service Facility Arrangements

Service Service
facility 1 facility 2

Service Service
facility 3 facility 4
Routing for : 1
124
Routing for : 2
243
Routing for : 3
3214
(e) Mixed

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/255

Probability Distributions

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/256

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 128


Engineering Services

Probability Distributions
Customer Arrivals
Arrival rate = 2/hour
Probability that 4 customers will arrive

(T)n -T
P(n) = e
n!

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/257

Probability Distributions
Service Time
Arrival rate = 2/hour Service time = 3/hour
Probability that 4 customers will arrive

16 -2
P(4) = e = 0.090
24
Probability that a customer requires less than 10 minutes

P(t T) = 1 e-T

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/258

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 129


Engineering Services

Probability Distributions
Customer Arrivals
Arrival rate = 2/hour
Probability that 4 customers will arrive

[2(1)]4 -2(1)
P(4) = e
4!

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/259

Probability Distributions
Customer Arrivals
Arrival rate = 2/hour
Probability that 4 customers will arrive

16 -2
P(4) = e = 0.090
24

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/260

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 130


Engineering Services

Probability Distributions
Service Time
Arrival rate = 2/hour Service time = 3/hour
Probability that 4 customers will arrive

16 -2
P(4) = e = 0.090
24
Probability that a customer requires less than 10 minutes

P(t 0.167 hr) = 1 e-3(0.167)

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/261

Probability Distributions
Service Time
Arrival rate = 2/hour Service time = 3/hour
Probability that 4 customers will arrive

16 -2
P(4) = e = 0.090
24
Probability that a customer requires less than 10 minutes

P(t 0.167 hr) = 1 0.61 = 0.39

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/262

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 131


Engineering Services

Operating Characteristics

Line Length
Number of
Customers in System
Waiting Time in Line
Total Time in System
Service Facility Utilization

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/263

Single-Server Model


= Average utilization
utilization of the system =

n = Probability that n customers are in the system = (1 )n

L = Average number of customers in the service system =




Lq = Average number of customers in the waiting line = L

1
W = Average time spent in the system, including service =

Wq = Average waiting time in line = W

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/264

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 132


Engineering Services

Waiting Line Models

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/265

Waiting Line Models


Single-Channel, Single-Phase System
Arrival rate = 30/hour Service rate = 35/hour

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/266

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 133


Engineering Services

Waiting Line Models


Single-Channel, Single-Phase System
Arrival rate = 30/hour Service rate = 35/hour


Utilization = =

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/267

Waiting Line Models


Single-Channel, Single-Phase System
Arrival rate = 30/hour Service rate = 35/hour

30
Utilization = = =
35

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/268

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 134


Engineering Services

Waiting Line Models


Single-Channel, Single-Phase System
Arrival rate = 30/hour Service rate = 35/hour

30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/269

Waiting Line Models


Single-Channel, Single-Phase System
Arrival rate = 30/hour Service rate = 35/hour

30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35

Average number in system = L =



Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/270

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 135


Engineering Services

Waiting Line Models


Single-Channel, Single-Phase System
Arrival rate = 30/hour Service rate = 35/hour

30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Average number in system = L = = 6 customers
35 30

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/271

Waiting Line Models


Single-Channel, Single-Phase System
Arrival rate = 30/hour Service rate = 35/hour

30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Average number in system = L = = 6 customers
35 30

Average number in line = Lq = L

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/272

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 136


Engineering Services

Waiting Line Models


Single-Channel, Single-Phase System
Arrival rate = 30/hour Service rate = 35/hour

30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Average number in system = L = = 6 customers
35 30

Average number in line = Lq = 0.857(6)

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/273

Waiting Line Models


Single-Channel, Single-Phase System
Arrival rate = 30/hour Service rate = 35/hour

30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Average number in system = L = = 6 customers
35 30

Average number in line = Lq = 0.857(6) = 5.14 customers

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/274

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 137


Engineering Services

Waiting Line Models


Single-Channel, Single-Phase System
Arrival rate = 30/hour Service rate = 35/hour

30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Average number in system = L = = 6 customers
35 30

Average number in line = Lq = 0.857(6) = 5.14 customers

1
Average time in system = W =

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/275

Waiting Line Models


Single-Channel, Single-Phase System
Arrival rate = 30/hour Service rate = 35/hour

30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Average number in system = L = = 6 customers
35 30

Average number in line = Lq = 0.857(6) = 5.14 customers

1
Average time in system = W =
35 30

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/276

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 138


Engineering Services

Waiting Line Models


Single-Channel, Single-Phase System
Arrival rate = 30/hour Service rate = 35/hour

30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Average number in system = L = = 6 customers
35 30

Average number in line = Lq = 0.857(6) = 5.14 customers

1
Average time in system = W = = 0.20 hour, or 12 minutes
35 30

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/277

Waiting Line Models


Single-Channel, Single-Phase System
Arrival rate = 30/hour Service rate = 35/hour

30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Average number in system = L = = 6 customers
35 30

Average number in line = Lq = 0.857(6) = 5.14 customers

1
Average time in system = W = = 0.20 hour, or 12 minutes
35 30

Average time in line = Wq = W

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/278

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 139


Engineering Services

Waiting Line Models


Single-Channel, Single-Phase System
Arrival rate = 30/hour Service rate = 35/hour

30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Average number in system = L = = 6 customers
35 30

Average number in line = Lq = 0.857(6) = 5.14 customers

1
Average time in system = W = = 0.20 hour, or 12 minutes
35 30

Average time in line = Wq = 0.857(0.20)

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/279

Waiting Line Models


Single-Channel, Single-Phase System
Arrival rate = 30/hour Service rate = 35/hour

30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Average number in system = L = = 6 customers
35 30

Average number in line = Lq = 0.857(6) = 5.14 customers

1
Average time in system = W = = 0.20 hour, or 12 minutes
35 30

Average time in line = Wq = 0.857(0.20) = 0.17 hour, or 10.28 minutes

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/280

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 140


Engineering Services

Waiting Line Models


Single-Server Model
Arrival rate = = 30/hour

Average time in system = 8 minutes

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/281

Waiting Line Models


Single-Server Model
Arrival rate = = 30/hour
1
Average time in system = 8 minutes = W =

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/282

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 141


Engineering Services

Waiting Line Models


Single-Server Model
Arrival rate = = 30/hour
1
Average time in system = 8 minutes = W =
30

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/283

Waiting Line Models


Single-Server Model
Arrival rate = = 30/hour Service rate = = 37.52/hour
1
Average time in system = 8 minutes = W =
30

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/284

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 142


Engineering Services

Waiting Line Models


Single-Server Model
Arrival rate = = 30/hour Service rate = = 37.52/hour
1
Average time in system = 8 minutes = W =
30

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/285

Waiting Line Models


Single-Server Model
Arrival rate = = 30/hour Service rate = = 37.52/hour
1
Average time in system = 8 minutes = W =
30
4
Probability of more than 4 customers = = 1 n
n=0

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/286

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 143


Engineering Services

Waiting Line Models


Single-Server Model
Arrival rate = = 30/hour Service rate = = 37.52/hour
1
Average time in system = 8 minutes = W =
30
4
Probability of more than 4 customers = = 1 (1 )n
n=0

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/287

Waiting Line Models


Single-Server Model
Arrival rate = = 30/hour Service rate = = 37.52/hour
1
Average time in system = 8 minutes = W =
30
4
Probability of more than 4 customers = = 1 (1 )n
n=0

30
= = 0.80
37.52

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/288

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 144


Engineering Services

Waiting Line Models


Single-Server Model
Arrival rate = = 30/hour Service rate = = 37.52/hour
1
Average time in system = 8 minutes = W =
30
Probability of more than 4 customers = = 1 0.2(1 + 0.8 + 0.82
+ 0.83 + 0.84)
30
= = 0.80
37.52

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/289

Waiting Line Models


Single-Server Model
Arrival rate = = 30/hour Service rate = = 37.52/hour
1
Average time in system = 8 minutes = W =
30
Probability of more than 4 customers = = 0.328

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/290

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 145


Engineering Services

Waiting Line Models


Single-Server Model
Arrival rate = = 30/hour Service rate = = 37.52/hour
1
Average time in system = 8 minutes = W =
30
Probability of more than 4 customers = = 0.328

Service rate for


a 10% chance
of exceeding 4 = 1 (1 )(1 + + 2 + 3 + 4)
customers in
the system

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/291

Waiting Line Models


Single-Server Model
Arrival rate = = 30/hour Service rate = = 37.52/hour
1
Average time in system = 8 minutes = W =
30
Probability of more than 4 customers = = 0.328

Service rate for


a 10% chance
of exceeding 4 = 1 1 2 3 4 + + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5
customers in
the system

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/292

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 146


Engineering Services

Waiting Line Models


Single-Server Model
Arrival rate = = 30/hour Service rate = = 37.52/hour
1
Average time in system = 8 minutes = W =
30
Probability of more than 4 customers = = 0.328

Service rate for


a 10% chance
of exceeding 4 = 5 or = 1/5
customers in
the system

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/293

Waiting Line Models


Single-Server Model
Arrival rate = = 30/hour Service rate = = 37.52/hour
1
Average time in system = 8 minutes = W =
30
Probability of more than 4 customers = = 0.328

Service rate for


a 10% chance
of exceeding 4 = 5 or = 1/5 If = 0.10
customers in
the system

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/294

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 147


Engineering Services

Waiting Line Models


Single-Server Model
Arrival rate = = 30/hour Service rate = = 37.52/hour
1
Average time in system = 8 minutes = W =
30
Probability of more than 4 customers = = 0.328

Service rate for


a 10% chance
of exceeding 4 = 5 or = (0.10)1/5 If = 0.10
customers in
the system

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/295

Waiting Line Models


Single-Server Model
Arrival rate = = 30/hour Service rate = = 37.52/hour
1
Average time in system = 8 minutes = W =
30
Probability of more than 4 customers = = 0.328

Service rate for


a 10% chance
of exceeding 4 = 5 or = 0.63 If = 0.10
customers in
the system

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/296

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 148


Engineering Services

Waiting Line Models


Single-Server Model
Arrival rate = = 30/hour Service rate = = 37.52/hour
1
Average time in system = 8 minutes = W =
30
Probability of more than 4 customers = = 0.328

Service rate for


a 10% chance 30
of exceeding 4 = 5 or = 0.63 =
customers in
the system

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/297

Waiting Line Models


Single-Server Model
Arrival rate = = 30/hour Service rate = = 47.62/hour
1
Average time in system = 8 minutes = W =
30
Probability of more than 4 customers = = 0.328

Service rate for


a 10% chance 30
of exceeding 4 = 5 or = 0.63 =
customers in
the system

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/298

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 149


Engineering Services

Waiting Line Models


Single-Server Model
Arrival rate = = 30/hour Service rate = = 47.62/hour
1
Average time in system = 8 minutes = W =
30
Probability of more than 4 customers = = 0.328

Service rate for


a 10% chance 30
of exceeding 4 = 5 or = 0.63 =
customers in
the system

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/299

Waiting Line Models


Single-Server Model
Arrival rate = = 30/hour Service rate = = 47.62/hour
1
Average time in system = 8 minutes = W =
30
Probability of more than 4 customers = = 0.328

Service rate for


a 10% chance 30
of exceeding 4 = 5 or = 0.63 =
customers in
the system

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/300

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 150


Engineering Services

Lean Production Models

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/301

Contents

TVAL Model
Sequence Schedule in JIT
Quantitative Stock Analysis for JIT
Inventory Models

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/302

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 151


Engineering Services

TVAL Model
Toyota Verification of Assembly Line
Measure the workload or fatigue rate of each
assembly line operation
Measuring Equation:
L = 27.03 log t + 53.78 log M 48.76
Where
L = physiological load or fatigue rate (%)
beyond L operator cannot continue
M = ratio of Electro-Motive Force (EMF) to its
max (need EMF meter)
T = sustaining time of an operation

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/303

TVAL Model
Past Equation holds regardless of posture
Another posture dependent Equation:
L = d1 log t + d2 log W 162.0
W =task load determined by handling
weight, operation posture, assembling
muscle power, pushing direction,
In a cycling operation: W = 9.31 t0.0129 M0.457
Toyota concluded: fatigue rate < 80 %
Equations would not apply to all situations
Need to develop our own
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/304

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 152


Engineering Services

Sequence Scheduling Method for Smoothing

Mixed Assembly Line


Goal: Reduce differences in assembly
hrs among products models
Basic Logic: Two main Components
Appearance Ratio (AR) control
Continuation and Interval (CI) controls

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/305

Sequence Scheduling Method for


Smoothing (AR)

Average AR : Target for the sequence


Calculated as

Total no of certain spec product


AR =
Total no of all products

Smoothing in sequence: difficult to realize


in final 10 % of product in a day
To solve problem: use CI controls

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/306

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 153


Engineering Services

Sequence Scheduling Method for Smoothing


Continuation and Interval (CI) controls

Continuation control: Introduce


designated maximum of certain product in
a succession in Assembly Line Example
Max of 2 cars in succession
Interval control: keeps intervals of units
between two same product within a
designated minimum interval

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/307

Why Manage Inventory?

Total $ investment on in inventories is $1.37


trillion (last quarter of 1999)
34% in Manufacturing
26% in Retail
22% in Wholesale 82% of the total
8% in Farm
10% in Other

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/308

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 154


Engineering Services

Why Manage Inventory? - Examples


In 1998, American companies spent $898 billion in logistics-
related activities (or 10.6% of Gross Domestic Product).
Transportation 58%
Inventory 38%
Management 4%
By effectively managing inventory:
Xerox eliminated $700 million inventory from its supply
chain
Wal-Mart became the largest retail company utilizing
efficient inventory management
GM has reduced parts inventory and transportation
costs by 26% annually

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/309

Why Manage Inventory? - Examples


By not managing inventory successfully
In 1994, IBM continues to struggle with
shortages in ThinkPad line (WSJ, Oct 7, 1994)
In 1993, Liz Claiborne said its unexpected
earning decline is a result of higher excess
inventory (WSJ, July 15, 1993)
In 1993, Dell Computers predicts a loss; Stock
plunges. Dell acknowledged company was
sharply off in its forecast of demand, resulting
in inventory write downs (WSJ, August 1993)

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/310

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 155


Engineering Services

Inventory

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/311

Why do we hold inventory?

Economies of scale
Uncertainty in supply and demand
Speculation
Transportation
Smoothing production/purchasing
Logistics
Cost of controlling inventory

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/312

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 156


Engineering Services

Decisions to Make
We have to decide
How often we review the inventory
When we should issue a
(replenishment/production) order
How large the order should be

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/313

Characteristics of Inventory Systems

Demand
Constant (level) or variable
Deterministic (known) or Stochastic (random
or uncertain)
Lead Time
Review Time
Continuous or periodic review
Excess Demand
Backordered or lost
Changing inventory

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/314

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 157


Engineering Services

Inventory-Related Costs

Ordering or Setup Costs


Inventory Carrying or Holding
Costs
Stockout Costs
Capacity Associated Costs
Cost of Goods

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/315

Relevant Costs

Unit value or unit variable cost (c)


Cost of making a part available for usage
Purchase + Freight + Mfg. Costs
Usually different from accounting cost
Should include more than just book value

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/316

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 158


Engineering Services

Relevant Costs

Holding cost (cost of carrying in inv.)


Opportunity costs of the money tied to
inventory (I = ic), where i is the available rate
of return on investment (may use IRR).
Warehousing and Handling (cost of providing
space to store items, counting and moving
items in the warehouse)
Deterioration, damage, obsolescence
Insurance and taxes
W: Warehousing cost, $ per item per year

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/317

Relevant Costs
The cost of placing a purchase order from a vendor
include
Order forms
Postage
Telecommunications
Authorization
Purchase order planning
Purchase order entry time
Purchase order processing time

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/318

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 159


Engineering Services

Relevant Costs
The cost of placing a purchase order from a vendor
include

Purchase order inspection time


Purchase order follow-up time
Purchasing management
Office space
Office supplies
Purchase order entry systems
Tracking and expediting

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/319

EOQ History
Introduced in 1913 by Ford W. Harris, How Many
Parts to Make at Once

Interest on capital tied up in wages, material and overhead


sets a maximum limit to the quantity of parts which can be
profitably manufactured at one time; set-up costs on the
job fix the minimum. Experience has shown one manager
a way to determine the economical size of lots.

Early application of mathematical modeling to Scientific


Management

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/320

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 160


Engineering Services

Inventory Management

There are nine popular distribution inventory


control policies organized into three categories:
Manual inventory control
Two-Bin Systems (2BS)
Visual Review (VR)
Basic replenishment schemes
Re-Order Point (ROP) with Economic Order
Quantities
(EOQ) ROP/ EOQ
Source: Frazelle, Edward H. Supply Chain Strategy. McGraw-Hill Education Group, 2001
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/321

Inventory Management

Re-Order Point (ROP) with Order Up to


Levels (OUL) ROP/ OUL
Review Time Period (RTP) with Order Up
to Levels (OUL) RTP/ OUL
Review Time Period with Re-Order Points
and Order-Up-To Levels RTP/ ROP/
OUL

Source: Frazelle, Edward H. Supply Chain Strategy. McGraw-Hill Education Group, 2001
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/322

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 161


Engineering Services

Inventory Management

Source: Frazelle, Edward H. Supply Chain Strategy. McGraw-Hill Education Group, 2001
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/323

Inventory Costs

Interest or
Opportunity Cost
Storage and
Handling Costs
Taxes, Insurance,
and Shrinkage

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/324

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 162


Engineering Services

Inventory Costs
Customer Service
Ordering Cost
Setup Cost
Labor and
Equipment Utilization
Transportation Costs
Payments to Suppliers
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/325

Types of Inventory
Cycle Inventory
Q+0
Average cycle inventory =
2

Safety Stock Inventory


Anticipation Inventory
Pipeline Inventory

Pipeline inventory = DL = dL

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/326

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 163


Engineering Services

Types of Inventory

Cycle inventory = Q/2


= 280/2
= 140 drills

Pipeline inventory = DL = dL
= (70 drills/week)(3 weeks)
= 210 drills

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/327

How
Much?
When!

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/328

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 164


Engineering Services

Economic Order
Quantity

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/329

EOQ Modeling Assumptions


1. Production is instantaneous No capacity constraint and the
entire lot is produced simultaneously.
2. Delivery is immediate No time lag between production and
availability to satisfy demand.
3. Demand is deterministic No uncertainty about the quantity
or timing of demand.
4. Demand is constant over time represented as a straight line
- if annual demand= 365 units translates one unit/day.
5. A production run incurs a fixed setup cost independent of
lot size, the setup cost is constant.
6. Products can be analyzed singly either it is only a single
product or conditions exist to ensure products separability.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/330

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 165


Engineering Services

Economic Order Quantity


Assumptions
1. Demand rate is constant
2. No constraints on lot size
3. Only relevant costs are holding and
ordering/setup
4. Decisions for items are independent
from other items
5. No uncertainty in lead time or supply

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/331

EOQ Trade-off

Two interpretations:
If you order more (larger Q), you incur
higher inventory cost, but less setup cost
If you order less frequently, you incur larger
inventory cost, but less setup cost
The trade-off is not linear!

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/332

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 166


Engineering Services

Economic Order Quantity

Receive Inventory depletion


order (demand rate)
On--hand inventory (units)

Q Average
cycle
2
inventory
On

1 cycle
Time
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/333

Economic Order Quantity

Total cost = HC + OC
Annual cost (dollars)

Holding cost (HC


(HC))

Ordering cost (OC


(OC))

Lot Size (Q
(Q)
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/334

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 167


Engineering Services

Economic Order Quantity


Example 15.2

3000
Q D
Annual cost (dollars)

Total cost = (H
(H) + (S
(S)
2 Q

2000
Q
Holding cost = (H
(H)
2

1000
D
Ordering cost = (S
(S)
Q

0 | | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Lot Size (Q
(Q)
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/335

Economic Order Quantity: Example

3000
Q D
Annual cost (dollars)

Total cost = (H
(H) + (S
(S)
2 Q

2000
Connectors costs
Q
Holding cost = (H
(H)
D = (18 /week)(52 weeks) = 936 units 2
H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
S = $45 Q = 390 units
1000
Q D D
Ordering cost = (S
(S)
C= (H) + (S) Q
2 Q
| | | | | | | |
C0
= $2925 + $108 = $3033
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Lot Size (Q
(Q)
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/336

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 168


Engineering Services

Economic Order Quantity


Current
cost Example

3000
Q D
Annual cost (dollars)

Total cost = (H
(H) + (S
(S)
2 Q

2000
Connectors costs
Q
Holding cost = (H
(H)
D = (18 /week)(52 weeks) = 936 units 2
H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
S = $45 Q = 390 units
1000
Q D D
Ordering cost = (S
(S)
C= (H) + (S) Q
2 Q
| | | | | | | |
C0
= $2925 + $108 = $3033
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Current
Lot Size (Q
(Q)
Q
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/337

Economic Order Quantity


Current
cost Example
3000
Q D
Annual cost (dollars)

Total cost = (H
(H) + (S
(S)
2 Q

2000
Connectors costs
Q
Holding cost = (H
(H)
D = (18 /week)(52 weeks) = 936 units 2
H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
S = $45 Q = 390 units
1000
Q D D
Ordering cost = (S
(S)
C= (H) + (S) Q
2 Q
| | | | | | | |
C0
= $2925 + $108 = $3033
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Current
Lot Size (Q
(Q)
Q
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/338

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 169


Engineering Services

Economic Order Quantity :Example


Current
cost

3000
Q D
Annual cost (dollars)

Total cost = (H
(H) + (S
(S)
2 Q

2000
Connectors costs
Q
Holding cost = (H
(H)
D = (18 /week)(52 weeks) = 936 units 2
H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
S = $45 Q = 468 units
1000
Q D D
Ordering cost = (S
(S)
C= (H) + (S) Q
2 Q
| | | | | | | |
C0
= $3510 + $90 = $3600
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Current
Lot Size (Q
(Q)
Q
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/339

Economic Order Quantity


Current
cost Example 15.2
Connectors costs
3000
Q D
Annual cost (dollars)

Total cost = D(H= )(18


(H + /week)(52
(S
(S) weeks) = 936 units
2 Q
H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
S = $45 Q = EOQ
2000
Q
2DS Holding Q
cost = D(H
(H)
EOQ = C= (H) +2 (S)
H 2 Q

1000
D
Ordering cost = (S
(S)
Q

0 | | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Current
Lot Size (Q
(Q)
Q
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/340

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 170


Engineering Services

Economic Order Quantity


Current
cost Example 15.2

3000 Connectors costs


Q D
Annual cost (dollars)

Total cost = D(H= )(18


(H + /week)(52
(S
(S) weeks) = 936 units
2 Q
H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
S = $45 Q = 75
2000
Q
2DS Holding Q
cost = D(H
(H)
EOQ = C= (H) +2 (S)
H 2 Q

1000
D
Ordering cost = (S
(S)
Q

0 | | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Current
Example Lot Size (Q
(Q)
Q
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/341

Economic Order Quantity


Current
cost Example 15.2

3000 Connectors costs


Q D
Annual cost (dollars)

Total cost = D(H= )(18


(H + /week)(52
(S
(S) weeks) = 936 units
2 Q
H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
S = $45 Q = 75
2000
Q
2DS Holding Q
cost = D(H
(H)
EOQ = C= (H) +2 (S)
H 2 Q

1000 C = $562 + $562 = $1124


D
Ordering cost = (S
(S)
Q

0 | | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Current
Example Lot Size (Q
(Q)
Q
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/342

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 171


Engineering Services

Economic Order Quantity


Current
cost Example 15.2

3000 Connectors costs


Q D
Annual cost (dollars)

Total cost = D(H= )(18


(H + /week)(52
(S
(S) weeks) = 936 units
2 Q
H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
S = $45 Q = 75
2000
Q
2DS Holding Q
cost = D(H
(H)
EOQ = C= (H) +2 (S)
H 2 Q

1000 C = $562 + $562 = $1124


D
Lowest Ordering cost = (S
(S)
Q
cost

0 | | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Best Q Current
Example Lot Size (Q
(Q)
(EOQ) Q
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/343

Economic Order Quantity


Current
cost Example 15.2

3000 Connectors costs


Q D
Annual cost (dollars)

Total cost = D(H= )(18


(H + /week)(52
(S
(S) weeks) = 936 units
2 Q
H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
S = $45 Q = 75
2000
Q
2DS Holding Q
cost = D(H
(H)
EOQ = C= (H) +2 (S)
H 2 Q

1000 C = $562 + $562 = $1124


D
Lowest Ordering cost = (S
(S)
Q
cost

0 | | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Best Q Current
Example Lot Size (Q
(Q)
(EOQ) Q
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/344

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 172


Engineering Services

Economic Order Quantity


Current
cost Example 15.2
Bird feeder costs
3000 Time between orders
Q D
Annual cost (dollars)

Total cost = D(H= )(18


(H + /week)(52
(S
(S) weeks) = 936 units
2 Q
HTBO EOQ = $15
= 0.25 ($60/unit)
EOQ = = 75/936 = 0.080 year
S = $45 D Q = 75
2000
Q
Holding Q
cost = D(H
(H)
TBO=EOQ 2DS
EOQ = (75/936)(12)
C = = (H)
0.96+2months
(S)
H 2 Q
TBOEOQ = (75/936)(52) = 4.17 weeks
1000 C = $562 + $562 = $1124
TBOEOQ = (75/936)(365) = 29.25D days
Ordering cost = (S
S)
Lowest Ordering cost = ( )
Q
cost

0 | | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Best Q Current
Example Lot Size (Q
(Q)
(EOQ) Q
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/345

How
Much?
When!

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/346

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 173


Engineering Services

up
So
Soup

Soup
Continuous Review
IP IP IP

Order Order Order Order


received received received received
On--hand inventory

Q Q Q

OH OH OH
On

R
Order Order Order
placed placed placed

L L L Time
TBO TBO TBO

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/347

up
So
Soup

Soup

Continuous Review
IP IP IP

Order Order Order Order


received received received received
On--hand inventory

Connectors
Q Q Q
R = Average demand during lead time
OH OH = (25)(4) = 100
OH cases
On

R
IP = OH + SR BO
Order Order
placed
= 10 + 200 0Order
placed
= 210 cases
placed placed

L L L Time
TBO TBO TBO
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/348

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 174


Engineering Services

Uncertain Demand
IP
IP
Order
Order
Order received
received
received Order
received
On--hand inventory

Q
Q Q
OH

R
Order Order Order
On

placed placed placed

L1 L2 L3 Time
TBO1 TBO2 TBO3

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/349

Reorder Point / Safety Stock

Cycle-
Cycle-service level = 85%

Probability of stockout
(1.0 0.85 = 0.15)
Average
demand
during
lead time R

zL

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/350

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 175


Engineering Services

Reorder Point / Safety Stock


Safety Stock/R
Safety stock = zL
= 2.33(22) = 51.3
Cycle-
Cycle-service level = 85%
= 51 boxes

Reorder point = ADDLT + SS


= 250 + 51
= 301 boxes Probability of stockout
(1.0 0.85 = 0.15)
Average
demand
during
lead time R

zL
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/351

Lead Time Distributions


t = 15
t = 26

+
75
Demand for week 1
t = 15

+ 225
Demand for
75
Demand for week 2 three-
three-week lead time
t = 15

=
75
Demand for week 3
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/352

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 176


Engineering Services

Lead Time Distributions


t = 15
t = 26

+ Connectors Lead Time Distribution


75
Demand for week 1
t = 1 week
t = 15 d = 18 L=2

+ L = t L =5 2 = 7.1
225
75 Safety stock = zL = 1.28(7.1)Demand
= 9.1 or
for9 units
Demand for week 2 three-
three-week lead time
t = 15
Reorder point = dL + Safety stock
= 2(18) + 9 = 45 units

Example
=
75
Demand for week 3
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/353

Lead Time Distributions


t = 15
t = 26

+ Connectors Lead Time Distribution


75
Demand for week 1
t = 15
Reorder point = 2(18) + 9 = 45 units

+
C=
75
($15) +
936
($45)
225
+ 9($15)
Demand for
75
Demand for week 2
2 75 three-
three-week lead time
t = 15
C = $562.50 + $561.60 + $135 = $1259.10

Example
=
75
Demand for week 3
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/354

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 177


Engineering Services

Periodic Review Systems


T
IP IP IP
Order Order Order
received received received
On--hand inventory

Q3
Q1
OH Q2 OH
IP1

IP3
Order Order
On

placed placed
IP2

L L L Time
P P
Protection interval

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/355

Periodic Review Systems


T
IP IP TV Set - P System IP
Order Order Order
received received
IP = OH + SR BO received
On--hand inventory

Q3
Q1 Q
OH OHt = T - IPt
Q2
IP1
T = 400 BO = 5
IP3 OH = 0 SR = 0
Order Order
On

placed placed
IP2 IP = 0 + 0 5 = 5 sets
Q = 400 (5) = 405 sets
L L L Time
P P
Protection interval

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/356

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 178


Engineering Services

Periodic Review Systems


T
IP IP IP
Order
Connectors Order P and T
Calculating Order
received received received
On--hand inventory

Q
t =
Q118 units L = 2 weeks cycle/service level = 90%
3
OH Q2 OH
EOQ = 75 units D = (18 units/week)(52 weeks) = 936 units
IP1
EOQ 75
IP3 P= (52) = (52) = 4.2 or 4 weeks
D 936
Order Order
On

placed P+L = P + L = 5 placed


6 = 12 units
IP2
T = Average demand during the protection interval + Safety stock
= d (P + L) + zP + L
L L L
= (18 units/week)(16 weeks) + 1.28(12 units) = 123 units Time
P P
Protection interval

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/357

Periodic Review Systems


T
IP IP IP
Order
Connectors Order P and T
Calculating Order
received received received
On--hand inventory

Q3
t =
Q118 units L = 2 weeks cycle/service level = 90%
OH Q2 OH
EOQ = 75 units D = (18 units/week)(52 weeks) = 936 units
IP1
P = 4 weeks T = 123 units
IP3
Order Order
On

placed 4(18) 936placed


IP2 C= ($15) + ($45) + 15($15)
2 4(18)

C = $540 + $585 + $225 = $1350


L L L Time
P P
Protection interval
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/358

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 179


Engineering Services

Comparison of Q and P Systems

P Systems
Convenient to administer
Orders may be combined
IP only required at review
Q Systems
Individual review frequencies
Possible quantity discounts
Lower, less-expensive safety stocks
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/359

EOQ Model

Assumptions:
No Stockouts
Order when no inventory
Order size determines policy

Inventory
Qavg = Q/2

Order Avg. Inventory (Qavg)


Quantity
Q

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/360

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 180


Engineering Services

Dynamic Lot Sizing

Another EOQ assumption:


Demand is constant over time
Dynamic Lot Sizing relaxes this assumption
Demand is changing over time
But demand in each period is known (so still
deterministic).

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/361

Dynamic Lot Sizing

Examples:
MRP
Firm orders and contracts for future periods
Seasonal demand patterns
Demand with trend (increasing or decreasing over
time)

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/362

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 181


Engineering Services

Dynamic Lot Sizing

Example:
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Demand 10 15 12 16 15 12 18 14 22 16

Other data
Beginning inventory: 0
Setup cost: $150
Inventory carrying cost: $2 per unit per
period

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/363

Dynamic Lot Sizing


Issues:
Determine a planning horizon
Calculate total cost over the planning horizon
Implementing decisions over time
Rolling horizon concept
Discrete demand vs. Continuous demand
Discrete Replenishments vs. Any-time
replenishments

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/364

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 182


Engineering Services

Dynamic Lot Sizing

Quick Solutions
Order every period exactly as much as you need
Lot-for-Lot
Determine a fixed order quantity and order when
you need to order (i.e., when on-hand inventory is
less than the next periods demand)
Example: EOQ
Order constant time-supply (i.e., order the
amount sufficient to cover total demand in next
three months)

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/365

Dynamic Lot Sizing

Lot-for-lot solution:
P eriod 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total
D em an d 10 15 12 16 15 12 18 14 22 16 150
O rd er 10 15 12 16 15 12 18 14 22 16 150
B eg in n in g I. 10 15 12 16 15 12 18 14 22 16 150
E n d I. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
H old in g C ost 10 15 12 16 15 12 18 14 22 16 150

Total Cost = 150 + 10 * 150 = $1650

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/366

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 183


Engineering Services

Dynamic Lot Sizing

Other heuristics:
EOQ as a Time Supply
Periodic Order Quantity (POQ)
Part-Period Balancing (PPB)
Silver-Meal (or Least Period Cost)

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/367

Dynamic Lot Sizing

Example
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Demand 10 15 12 16 15 12 18 14 22 16

Calculate EOQ:
Average demand per week = ____
Holding cost per unit per week = ____
EOQ = ____
Total Holding and Setup Cost = ____

2DS 2(150)(15)
Q =
*
= = 47.43
H 2
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/368

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 184


Engineering Services

Dynamic Lot Sizing- EOQ

Period 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total
Demand 10 15 12 16 15 12 18 14 22 16 150
Order 48 48 48 48 192
Beginning I. 48 38 23 59 43 28 64 46 32 58
End I. 38 23 11 43 28 16 46 32 10 42
Holding Cost 86 61 34 102 71 44 110 78 42 100 728

Total Cost = 728 + 4 * 150 = $1328

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/369

Dynamic Lot Sizing - POQ


Periodic Order Quantity
Calculate EOQ using Average Demand
Calculate Time Supply and round it to the
nearest integer
In each replenishment, order to cover that
many periods demand
Fixed order interval, but different quantity in
each replenishment

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/370

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 185


Engineering Services

Dynamic Lot Sizing - POQ

P eriod 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total
D em an d 10 15 12 16 15 12 18 14 22 16 150
O rd er 37 43 54 16 150
B eg in n in g I. 37 27 12 43 27 12 54 36 22 16
E n d I. 27 12 0 27 12 0 36 22 0 0
H old in g C os t 64 39 12 70 39 12 90 58 22 16 422

Total Cost = 422 + 4 * 150 = $1022

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/371

Dynamic Lot Sizing - PPB


Part-Period Balancing
Select the number of periods covered by the
replenishment such that the total inventory
carrying costs are as close as possible to the
setup cost.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/372

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 186


Engineering Services

Dynamic Lot Sizing - PPB


P eriod 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total
D em an d 10 15 12 16 15 12 18 14 22 16 150
O rd er 37 43 54 16 150
B eg in n in g I. 37 27 12 43 27 12 54 36 22 16
E n d I. 27 12 0 27 12 0 36 22 0 0
H old in g C ost 64 39 12 70 39 12 90 58 22 16 422

Total Cost = 422 + 4 * 150 = $1022

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/373

Dynamic Lot Sizing - SM

Silver-Meal (SM) Heuristic


Minimize total relevant costs per unit time for the
duration of the replenishment quantity.
Replenishment quantity Q should last for an integer
number of periods: cover the total demand in
periods 1 through T (decision variable T)
Min (Setup Cost + Inv Cost through T) / T
Q = D1 + + DT
Total Relevant Cost through T: TRC(T)
Select T such that TRC(T)/T is minimized.

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/374

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 187


Engineering Services

Dynamic Lot Sizing - SM

Silver-Meal (SM) Heuristic


Starting from T=1, compute TRC(T)/T for
increasing number of Ts
Stop when
TRC(T+1)/(T+1) > TRC(T)/T
Select T (before TRC per unit time starts
increasing)
TRC(T) = A+hD2+2hD3++(T-1)hDT

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/375

Dynamic Lot Sizing - SM

P e rio d 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 To ta l
D em an d 10 15 12 16 15 12 18 14 22 16 150
O rd e r 37 43 32 38 150
B e g in n in g I. 37 27 12 43 27 12 32 14 38 16
E n d I. 27 12 0 27 12 0 14 0 16 0
H o ld in g C o s t 64 39 12 70 39 12 46 14 54 16 366

Total Cost = 366 + 4 * 150 = $966

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/376

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 188


Engineering Services

Lot Sizing for JIT

Minimum lot size to avoid


interruption
EOQ is not used in JIT
Reduce Setup to minimize lot size
Hence reduce the stock of finished
and WIP products
In JIT: Time and uncertainty
justifies keeping little inventory

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/377

Lot Sizing for JIT


Reduction of Lot Size
Under Constraint that Total operation
time does not increase
Reduce setup time

Reducing unit producing time in the


preceding stage

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/378

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 189


Engineering Services

Lot Sizing for JIT


If time span for consuming one unit in the
subsequent process > (1+(2)/2)) t
t = time span of producing one unit in the
preceding stage
Then
Minimum lot size = quotient of:
the setup time in the preceding stage divided
by:
the difference between consumption time of
(2- (2) units and
the unit producing time in the subsequent and
preceding stages, respectively

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/379

Lot Sizing for JIT


Define
S = setup time for a lot
t = processing time of a part
aj = consumption quantity of part j
1
A = a and =
= avg time of
n
'

j =1
t
A
consuming one part in the subsequent stage
Then
S
=
(2 2 )t t
*
The min lot size q
'

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/380

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 190


Engineering Services

Lot Sizing for JIT: Example

S= 20 min
t = 2 min
t = 6 min

q*=20/ {[2-2]6-2}=14 units

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/381

Special Inventory Models


Production quantity
Q
On--hand inventory

Demand during
production interval
On

pd

Time

Figure E.1

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/382

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 191


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Production quantity
Q
On--hand inventory

Demand during
production interval
On

pd

Time
Production Demand
and demand only
TBO
Figure E.1

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/383

Special Inventory Models


Production quantity
Q
On--hand inventory

Demand during
production interval
On

pd

Time
Production Demand
and demand only
TBO
Figure E.1

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/384

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 192


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Production quantity
Q
On--hand inventory

Demand during
production interval
Imax
Maximum inventory
On

pd

Time
Production Demand
and demand only
TBO
Figure E.1

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/385

Special Inventory Models


Production quantity
Q
On--hand inventory

Demand during
production interval
Imax
Maximum inventory

pd
Q
( )
On

Imax = (p d) = Q p
pd p
Time
Production Demand
and demand only
TBO
Figure E.1

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/386

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 193


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Production quantity
Q
On--hand inventory

Demand during
production interval
Imax
Maximum inventory

Imax D
On

C= (H) + (S)
pd 2 Q

Time
Production Demand
and demand only
TBO
Figure E.1

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/387

Special Inventory Models


Production quantity
Q
On--hand inventory

Demand during
production interval
Imax
Maximum inventory

Q pd
) + QD
On

pd
C =2 p ( (S)

Time
Production Demand
and demand only
TBO
Figure E.1

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/388

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 194


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Production quantity
Q
On--hand inventory

Demand during
production interval
Imax
Maximum inventory

2DS p
On

ELS =
pd H pd

Time
Production Demand
and demand only
TBO
Figure E.1

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/389

Special Inventory Models


Economic Production Lot Size

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/390

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 195


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Economic Production Lot Size
Demand = 30 barrels/day Setup cost = $200
Production rate = 190 barrels/day Annual holding cost = $0.21/barrel
Annual demand = 10,500 barrels Plant operates 350 days/year

Example

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/391

Special Inventory Models


Economic Production Lot Size
Demand = 30 barrels/day Setup cost = $200
Production rate = 190 barrels/day Annual holding cost = $0.21/barrel
Annual demand = 10,500 barrels Plant operates 350 days/year

2DS p
ELS =
H pd

Example

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/392

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 196


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Economic Production Lot Size
Demand = 30 barrels/day Setup cost = $200
Production rate = 190 barrels/day Annual holding cost = $0.21/barrel
Annual demand = 10,500 barrels Plant operates 350 days/year

2(10,500)($200) 190
ELS =
$0.21 190 30

Example

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/393

Special Inventory Models


Economic Production Lot Size
Demand = 30 barrels/day Setup cost = $200
Production rate = 190 barrels/day Annual holding cost = $0.21/barrel
Annual demand = 10,500 barrels Plant operates 350 days/year

2(10,500)($200) 190
ELS =
$0.21 190 30

Example

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/394

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 197


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Economic Production Lot Size
Demand = 30 barrels/day Setup cost = $200
Production rate = 190 barrels/day Annual holding cost = $0.21/barrel
Annual demand = 10,500 barrels Plant operates 350 days/year

2(10,500)($200) 190
ELS =
$0.21 190 30

Example

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/395

Special Inventory Models


Economic Production Lot Size
Demand = 30 barrels/day Setup cost = $200
Production rate = 190 barrels/day Annual holding cost = $0.21/barrel
Annual demand = 10,500 barrels Plant operates 350 days/year

ELS = 4873.4 barrels

Example

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/396

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 198


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Economic Production Lot Size
Demand = 30 barrels/day Setup cost = $200
Production rate = 190 barrels/day Annual holding cost = $0.21/barrel
Annual demand = 10,500 barrels Plant operates 350 days/year

ELS = 4873.4 barrels

Q pd D
C =2 p (
(H) + (S
Q (
)
S)

Example

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/397

Special Inventory Models


Economic Production Lot Size
Demand = 30 barrels/day Setup cost = $200
Production rate = 190 barrels/day Annual holding cost = $0.21/barrel
Annual demand = 10,500 barrels Plant operates 350 days/year

ELS = 4873.4 barrels

4873.4 190 30 10,500


C=
2
(
190
)
($0.21) +
4873.4
($200)

Example

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/398

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 199


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Economic Production Lot Size
Demand = 30 barrels/day Setup cost = $200
Production rate = 190 barrels/day Annual holding cost = $0.21/barrel
Annual demand = 10,500 barrels Plant operates 350 days/year

ELS = 4873.4 barrels

C = $430.91 + $430.91

Example

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/399

Special Inventory Models


Economic Production Lot Size
Demand = 30 barrels/day Setup cost = $200
Production rate = 190 barrels/day Annual holding cost = $0.21/barrel
Annual demand = 10,500 barrels Plant operates 350 days/year

ELS = 4873.4 barrels

C = $861.82

Example

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/400

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 200


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Economic Production Lot Size
Demand = 30 barrels/day Setup cost = $200
Production rate = 190 barrels/day Annual holding cost = $0.21/barrel
Annual demand = 10,500 barrels Plant operates 350 days/year

ELS = 4873.4 barrels

C = $861.82

ELS
TBOELS = (350 days/year)
D
Example

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/401

Special Inventory Models


Economic Production Lot Size
Demand = 30 barrels/day Setup cost = $200
Production rate = 190 barrels/day Annual holding cost = $0.21/barrel
Annual demand = 10,500 barrels Plant operates 350 days/year

ELS = 4873.4 barrels

C = $861.82

4873.4
TBOELS = (350 days/year)
10,500
Example

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/402

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 201


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Economic Production Lot Size
Demand = 30 barrels/day Setup cost = $200
Production rate = 190 barrels/day Annual holding cost = $0.21/barrel
Annual demand = 10,500 barrels Plant operates 350 days/year

ELS = 4873.4 barrels

C = $861.82

TBOELS = 162.4, or 162 days


Example

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/403

Special Inventory Models


Economic Production Lot Size
Demand = 30 barrels/day Setup cost = $200
Production rate = 190 barrels/day Annual holding cost = $0.21/barrel
Annual demand = 10,500 barrels Plant operates 350 days/year

ELS = 4873.4 barrels

ELS
C = $861.82 Production time =
p

TBOELS = 162.4, or 162 days


Example

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/404

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 202


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Economic Production Lot Size
Demand = 30 barrels/day Setup cost = $200
Production rate = 190 barrels/day Annual holding cost = $0.21/barrel
Annual demand = 10,500 barrels Plant operates 350 days/year

ELS = 4873.4 barrels

4873.4
C = $861.82 Production time =
190

TBOELS = 162.4, or 162 days


Example

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/405

Special Inventory Models


Economic Production Lot Size
Demand = 30 barrels/day Setup cost = $200
Production rate = 190 barrels/day Annual holding cost = $0.21/barrel
Annual demand = 10,500 barrels Plant operates 350 days/year

ELS = 4873.4 barrels

C = $861.82 Production time = 25.6, or 26 days

TBOELS = 162.4, or 162 days


Example

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/406

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 203


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/407

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts
Total cost (dollars)

0 100 200 300


Purchase quantity (Q
(Q)
(a) Total cost curves with purchased materials added
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/408

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 204


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts
C for P = $4.00
C for P = $3.50
C for P = $3.00
Total cost (dollars)

0 100 200 300


Purchase quantity (Q
(Q)
(a) Total cost curves with purchased materials added
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/409

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts
C for P = $4.00
C for P = $3.50
C for P = $3.00
Total cost (dollars)

First Second
price price
break break
0 100 200 300
Purchase quantity (Q
(Q)
(a) Total cost curves with purchased materials added
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/410

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 205


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts
C for P = $4.00
C for P = $3.50
C for P = $3.00
Total cost (dollars)

First Second
price price
break break
0 100 200 300
Purchase quantity (Q
(Q)
(a) Total cost curves with purchased materials added
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/411

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts
C for P = $4.00
C for P = $3.50
C for P = $3.00
Total cost (dollars)

PD for
P = $4.00 PD for
P = $3.50 PD for
P = $3.00

First Second
price price
break break
0 100 200 300
Purchase quantity (Q
(Q)
(a) Total cost curves with purchased materials added
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/412

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 206


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts
C for P = $4.00
C for P = $3.50
C for P = $3.00
Total cost (dollars)

Total cost (dollars)


PD for
P = $4.00 PD for
P = $3.50 PD for
P = $3.00

First Second
price price
break break
0 100 200 300 0 100 200 300
Purchase quantity (Q
(Q) Purchase quantity (Q
(Q)
(a) Total cost curves with purchased materials added (b) EOQs and price break quantities
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/413

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts
C for P = $4.00
C for P = $3.50
C for P = $3.00
Total cost (dollars)

Total cost (dollars)

PD for
P = $4.00 PD for
P = $3.50 PD for
P = $3.00

First Second
price price
break break
0 100 200 300 0 100 200 300
Purchase quantity (Q
(Q) Purchase quantity (Q
(Q)
(a) Total cost curves with purchased materials added (b) EOQs and price break quantities
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/414

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 207


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts
C for P = $4.00
C for P = $3.50
C for P = $3.00
Total cost (dollars)

Total cost (dollars)


PD for
P = $4.00 PD for
P = $3.50 PD for
P = $3.00

First Second First Second


price price price price
break break break break

0 100 200 300 0 100 200 300


Purchase quantity (Q
(Q) Purchase quantity (Q
(Q)
(a) Total cost curves with purchased materials added (b) EOQs and price break quantities
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/415

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts
C for P = $4.00 EOQ 4.00
C for P = $3.50 EOQ 3.50
C for P = $3.00 EOQ 3.00
Total cost (dollars)

Total cost (dollars)

PD for
P = $4.00 PD for
P = $3.50 PD for
P = $3.00

First Second First Second


price price price price
break break break break

0 100 200 300 0 100 200 300


Purchase quantity (Q
(Q) Purchase quantity (Q
(Q)
(a) Total cost curves with purchased materials added (b) EOQs and price break quantities
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/416

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 208


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/417

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Order Quantity Price per Unit


0 299 $60.00 Annual demand = 936 units
300 499 $58.80 Ordering cost = $45
500 or more $57.00 Holding cost = 25% of unit price

Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/418

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 209


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Order Quantity Price per Unit


0 299 $60.00 Annual demand = 936 units
300 499 $58.80 Ordering cost = $45
500 or more $57.00 Holding cost = 25% of unit price

2DS
EOQ57.00 =
H

Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/419

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Order Quantity Price per Unit


0 299 $60.00 Annual demand = 936 units
300 499 $58.80 Ordering cost = $45
500 or more $57.00 Holding cost = 25% of unit price

2(936)(45)
EOQ57.00 =
0.25(57.00)

Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/420

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 210


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Order Quantity Price per Unit


0 299 $60.00 Annual demand = 936 units
300 499 $58.80 Ordering cost = $45
500 or more $57.00 Holding cost = 25% of unit price

2(936)(45)
EOQ57.00 =
0.25(57.00)

Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/421

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Order Quantity Price per Unit


0 299 $60.00 Annual demand = 936 units
300 499 $58.80 Ordering cost = $45
500 or more $57.00 Holding cost = 25% of unit price

EOQ57.00 = 77 units

Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/422

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 211


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Order Quantity Price per Unit


0 299 $60.00 Annual demand = 936 units
300 499 $58.80 Ordering cost = $45
500 or more $57.00 Holding cost = 25% of unit price

EOQ57.00 = 77 units

Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/423

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Order Quantity Price per Unit


0 299 $60.00 Annual demand = 936 units
300 499 $58.80 Ordering cost = $45
500 or more $57.00 Holding cost = 25% of unit price

EOQ57.00 = 77 units

Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/424

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 212


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Order Quantity Price per Unit


0 299 $60.00 Annual demand = 936 units
300 499 $58.80 Ordering cost = $45
500 or more $57.00 Holding cost = 25% of unit price

EOQ57.00 = 77 units EOQ58.80 = 76 units

Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/425

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Order Quantity Price per Unit


0 299 $60.00 Annual demand = 936 units
300 499 $58.80 Ordering cost = $45
500 or more $57.00 Holding cost = 25% of unit price

EOQ57.00 = 77 units EOQ58.80 = 76 units

Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/426

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 213


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Order Quantity Price per Unit


0 299 $60.00 Annual demand = 936 units
300 499 $58.80 Ordering cost = $45
500 or more $57.00 Holding cost = 25% of unit price

EOQ57.00 = 77 units EOQ58.80 = 76 units

Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/427

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Order Quantity Price per Unit


0 299 $60.00 Annual demand = 936 units
300 499 $58.80 Ordering cost = $45
500 or more $57.00 Holding cost = 25% of unit price

EOQ57.00 = 77 units EOQ58.80 = 76 units EOQ60.00 = 75 units

Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/428

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 214


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Order Quantity Price per Unit


0 299 $60.00 Annual demand = 936 units
300 499 $58.80 Ordering cost = $45
500 or more $57.00 Holding cost = 25% of unit price

EOQ57.00 = 77 units EOQ58.80 = 76 units EOQ60.00 = 75 units

Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/429

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Order Quantity Price per Unit


0 299 $60.00 Annual demand = 936 units
300 499 $58.80 Ordering cost = $45
500 or more $57.00 Holding cost = 25% of unit price

EOQ57.00 = 77 units EOQ58.80 = 76 units EOQ60.00 = 75 units

Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/430

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 215


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Order Quantity Price per Unit


0 299 $60.00 Annual demand = 936 units
300 499 $58.80 Ordering cost = $45
500 or more $57.00 Holding cost = 25% of unit price

EOQ57.00 = 77 units EOQ58.80 = 76 units EOQ60.00 = 75 units

Q D
C= (H
(H) + (S
(S) + PD
2 Q

Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/431

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Order Quantity Price per Unit


0 299 $60.00 Annual demand = 936 units
300 499 $58.80 Ordering cost = $45
500 or more $57.00 Holding cost = 25% of unit price

EOQ57.00 = 77 units EOQ58.80 = 76 units EOQ60.00 = 75 units

75 936
C75 = [(0.25)($60.00)] + ($45) + $60.00(936)
2 75

Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/432

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 216


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Order Quantity Price per Unit


0 299 $60.00 Annual demand = 936 units
300 499 $58.80 Ordering cost = $45
500 or more $57.00 Holding cost = 25% of unit price

EOQ57.00 = 77 units EOQ58.80 = 76 units EOQ60.00 = 75 units

C75 = $57,284

Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/433

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Order Quantity Price per Unit


0 299 $60.00 Annual demand = 936 units
300 499 $58.80 Ordering cost = $45
500 or more $57.00 Holding cost = 25% of unit price

EOQ57.00 = 77 units EOQ58.80 = 76 units EOQ60.00 = 75 units

C75 = $57,284
300 936
C300 = [(0.25)($58.80)] + ($45) + $58.80(936)
2 300

Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/434

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 217


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Order Quantity Price per Unit


0 299 $60.00 Annual demand = 936 units
300 499 $58.80 Ordering cost = $45
500 or more $57.00 Holding cost = 25% of unit price

EOQ57.00 = 77 units EOQ58.80 = 76 units EOQ60.00 = 75 units

C75 = $57,284

C300 = $57,382

Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/435

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Order Quantity Price per Unit


0 299 $60.00 Annual demand = 936 units
300 499 $58.80 Ordering cost = $45
500 or more $57.00 Holding cost = 25% of unit price

EOQ57.00 = 77 units EOQ58.80 = 76 units EOQ60.00 = 75 units

C75 = $57,284

C300 = $57,382
500 936
C500 = [(0.25)($57.00)] + ($45) + $57.00(936)
2 500 Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/436

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 218


Engineering Services

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Order Quantity Price per Unit


0 299 $60.00 Annual demand = 936 units
300 499 $58.80 Ordering cost = $45
500 or more $57.00 Holding cost = 25% of unit price

EOQ57.00 = 77 units EOQ58.80 = 76 units EOQ60.00 = 75 units

C75 = $57,284

C300 = $57,382

C300 = $56,999
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/437

Special Inventory Models


Quantity Discounts

Order Quantity Price per Unit


0 299 $60.00 Annual demand = 936 units
300 499 $58.80 Ordering cost = $45
500 or more $57.00 Holding cost = 25% of unit price

EOQ57.00 = 77 units EOQ58.80 = 76 units EOQ60.00 = 75 units

C75 = $57,284

C300 = $57,382

C300 = $56,999
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/438

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 219


Engineering Services

Inventory

Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/439

Elimam and Gaafar 2006 220

Potrebbero piacerti anche