Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Engineering Services
Lean Manufacturing
A 6-day training program
Tailored for LEONI
Abdelghani A. Elimam
Lotfi K. Gaafar
The American University in Cairo
June-July 2006
Course Objectives
Course Outline
Why TPM?
Avoid waste in a quickly changing
economic environment.
Produce goods without reducing
product quality.
Reduce cost.
Produce a low batch quantity at the
earliest possible time (JIT).
Goods send to the customers must be
non defective.
TPM History
TPM is an innovative Japanese concept originating in 1951 with
preventive maintenance concepts taken from USA.
Nippondenso of the Toyota group was the first company to introduce
plant wide preventive maintenance in 1960.
Nippondenso added Autonomous maintenance done by production
operators.
The maintenance crew went in the equipment modification for
improving reliability. The modifications were made or incorporated in
new equipment. This led to maintenance prevention. Thus preventive
maintenance along with Maintenance prevention and Maintainability
Improvement gave birth to Productive Maintenance.
The aim of productive maintenance was to maximize plant and
equipment effectiveness to achieve optimum life cycle cost of
production equipment.
By then Nippondenso had made quality circles, involving the
employees participation. Thus all employees took part in
implementing Productive maintenance. Based on these developments
Nippondenso was awarded the distinguished plant prize for
developing and implementing TPM, by the Japanese Institute of Plant
Engineers ( JIPE ). Thus Nippondenso became the first company to
obtain the TPM certification.
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/16 16
TPM Objectives
TPM Targets
Productivity
Obtain Minimum 80% OPE ( Overall
Plant Efficiency)
Obtain Minimum 90% OEE ( Overall
Equipment Efficiency)
Run the machines even during lunch.
(Lunch is for operators and not for
machines!)
Quality
No customer complaints
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/18 18
TPM Targets
Cost
Reduce manufacturing cost by 30%
Delivery
100% on time delivery
Safety
Accident free environment
Morale
Increase suggestions 3 folds. Develop
Multi-skilled and flexible workers
Pillars of TPM
PILLAR 1 - 5S
Japanese Term English Translation Equivalent 'S' term
PILLAR 1 5S Sort
Priority Frequency of Use How to use
Less than once per year, Once Throw away, Store away
Low
per year from the workplace
PILLAR 1 - 5S
SEITON - Organize
The concept here is that "Each item has a
place, and only one place". The items should
be placed back after usage at the same place.
To identify items easily, name plates and
colored tags have to be used. Vertical racks
can be used for this purpose, and heavy
items occupy the bottom position in the
racks.
SEISO - Shine the workplace
This involves cleaning the work place free of
burrs, grease, oil, waste, scrap etc. No
loosely hanging wires or oil leakage from
machines.
PILLAR 1 - 5S
SEIKETSU - Standardization
Employees have to discuss together and
decide on standards for keeping the work
place / Machines / pathways neat and clean.
These standards are implemented for whole
organization and are tested / inspected
randomly.
PILLAR 1 - 5S
To Sort To Straighten
Ensure space for
Eliminate whats each thing, and a
not absolutely thing for each space.
necessary No more searching.
To Sustain
PILLAR 1 - 5S
Visual Control &
the Workstation
Ergonomics
Adapt the workstation to the
employee
- more security
- more comfort
Reduce waste
- excessive fatigue
- useless efforts and movement
- less physical constraints
Tentative Standard :
JH schedule has to be made and followed strictly.
Schedule should be made regarding cleaning,
inspection and lubrication and it also should include
details like when, what and how.
Autonomous Management :
OEE and OPE and other TPM targets must be achieved
by continuous improve through Kaizen.
PDCA ( Plan, Do, Check and Act ) cycle must be
implemented for Kaizen.
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/34 34
Kaizen Policy:
Practice concepts of zero losses in every sphere of
activity.
relentless pursuit to achieve cost reduction targets
in all resources
Relentless pursuit to improve over all plant
equipment effectiveness.
Extensive use of PM analysis as a tool for eliminating
losses.
Focus on easy handling by operators.
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/36 36
Management loss
Operating motion loss
Line organization loss
Logistic loss
Measurement and adjustment loss
Energy loss
Die, jig and tool breakage loss
Yield loss
Preventive Maintenance
Breakdown Maintenance
Corrective Maintenance
Maintenance Prevention
Targets
Zero equipment failure and breakdown.
Improve reliability and maintainability.
Reduce maintenance cost.
Ensure availability of spares all the time
Target
Achieve and sustain customer complaints at zero.
Reduce in-process defects.
Reduce cost of quality.
PILLAR 6 - TRAINING
Aims at:
PILLAR 6 - TRAINING
Policy
Focus on improvement of knowledge, skills and
techniques.
Creating a training environment for self learning
based on felt needs.
Training curriculum / tools /assessment etc geared
to employee revitalization.
Training to remove employee fatigue and make work
enjoyable.
Target
Achieve and sustain downtime due to want at zero
on critical machines.
Achieve and sustain zero losses due to lack of
knowledge / skills / techniques.
Aim for 100 % participation in suggestion schemes.
PILLAR 6 - TRAINING
Steps in Educating and training activities
Processing loss
Cost losses in areas including procurement,
accounts, marketing, and sales
Communication loss
Idle loss
Set-up loss
Accuracy loss
Office equipment breakdown
Communication channel breakdown
Time spent on retrieval of information
Non availability of correct online stock status
Customer complaints due to logistics
Expenses on emergency dispatches/purchases
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/53 53
Inventory reduction
Lead time reduction of critical processes
Motion & space losses
Retrieval time reduction
Balancing the work load
Achieving zero breakdown of office equipment
like telephone and fax lines.
SMED
SMED Principles
1. Separate internal setup from external
setup
2. Convert internal setup to external
setup
3. Streamline all aspects of setup
4. Perform setup activities in parallel or
eliminate them entirely
SMED
Ultimately, SMED focuses on reducing changeover
and set-up times, thus enabling organizations to:
Benefits of SMED
Increased customer service levels and profits
Via Waste Elimination resulting in:
Reduced Lead Times-Faster Delivery
Zero Inventories-Reduced Working Capital
Improved Quality
Improved Safety
Smaller lots of products-flexibility
Diversified Product & Service Options
Poka-Yoke
3.5 inch diskette cannot be inserted unless
diskette is oriented correctly. This is as far as
a disk can be inserted upside-down.
From http://csob.berry.edu/faculty/jgrout/everyday.html
Poka-Yoke
File cabinets can fall over if too many
drawers are pulled out
From http://csob.berry.edu/faculty/jgrout/everyday.html
Poka-Yoke
Automobile controls have a mistake-proofing
device to insure that the key is in the on
position before allowing the driver to shift out
of park. The keys cannot be removed until
the car is in park.
From http://csob.berry.edu/faculty/jgrout/everyday.html
Poka-Yoke
Electronic door locks can have three
mistake-proofing devices:
insures that no door is left unlocked.
doors automatically lock when the car
exceeds 18 miles an hour.
lock won't operate when door is open and the
engine is running.
From http://csob.berry.edu/faculty/jgrout/everyday.html
Poka-Yoke
This iron turns off automatically when it is left
unattended or when it is returned to its holder
From http://csob.berry.edu/faculty/jgrout/everyday.html
Poka-Yoke
This wall mounted hair dryer has two slots on
either side of the switch. (One slot is partially
covered by my thumb.) The bracket on the
wall has two pointed prongs that go through
the two slots and turn the dryer off if the user
neglected to do so.
From http://csob.berry.edu/faculty/jgrout/everyday.html
TPM Benefits
Increased equipment productivity
Reduced equipment downtime
Increased plant capacity
Lower maintenance and production
costs
Approaching zero equipment-caused
defects
Enhanced job satisfaction
Increased Return On Investment
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/70
TPM Awards
Each year, JIPM offers TPM Awards to plants for exemplary TPM
achievements. The TPM Awards Committee, consisting of the
professors and JIPM experts, selects Award winners on the basis
of the Preliminary Assessment, Document Assessment and the
Final (On-site) Assessment. Award Categories are:
Quality Assurance
and Management
Main Topics
Quality assurance
The ISO 9000:2000 model for quality assurance and
management
Documentation and auditing
Total quality management
The 6 model for implementing total quality management
Quality Tools
process capability
Control charts
Quality
"The totality of characteristics on an entity that bear on
its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs"
(ISO 8402: Quality - Vocabulary)
Dimensions of Quality
Performance Aesthetics
Reliability Features
Durability Perceived Quality
Serviceability Conformance to
standards
Dimensions of Quality
Quality is:
Defined as conformance to
requirements, not goodness.
Achieved through prevention, not
appraisal.
Measured by the price of
nonconformance, not indexes.
Quality Characteristics
Physical - length, weight, voltage, viscosity
Sensory - taste, appearance, color
Time Orientation - reliability, durability,
serviceability
Specifications
Quality characteristics being measured are
often compared to standards or specifications.
Nominal or target value
Upper Specification Limit (USL)
Lower Specification Limit (LSL)
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/78
Sources of variability:
Processes
People
Equipment
Surroundings
Causes of Variation
What prevents perfection? Process variation...
Examples Examples
weather tool wear
accuracy of measurements Monday effect
capability of machine poor maintenance
Quality Evolution
Words of Wisdom
Demings Deadly Sins
Lack of Constancy
Concentration on Short-Term Profits
Over-reliance on Performance Appraisals
Job Hopping
Overemphasis on Visible Figures
Crosbys Absolutes for Quality Management
Quality is Conformance to Requirements, Not Goodness
Quality Systems Amount to Prevention
Zero Defects Define the Performance Standard
Measurement of Quality is the Price of Nonconformance
Quality Costs
Quality Costs are those categories of costs
that are associated with producing,
identifying, avoiding, or repairing products
that do not meet requirements. These costs
are:
Prevention Costs
Appraisal Costs
Internal Failure Costs
External Failure Costs
Quality Costs
Prevention costs
Costs to prevent non-conformance "Make it right
the first time"
Quality planning and engineering
New products review
Product/process design
Process control
Burn-in
Quality data acquisition and analysis
Quality Costs
Quality Costs
Appraisal costs
Costs to insure conformance to requirements and
standards
Inspection and test of incoming material
Destructive tests
Calibration
Field testing
Quality Costs
Quality Costs
Quality Measures
Variation- Why?
Variation- Types
Random Variables
Their values cannot be predicted accurately.
Formally, a random variable is a function that assigns a real
number to each outcome in the sample space of a random
experiment.
Examples include:
The number of students passing an exam out of 25 students.
The time to the first failure of a computer which is known to
fail, on average, once a year.
The temperature on any given day.
The number of defective products from a production line.
Variables
Main
Effect
600 100
500
80
400
Percent
60
Count
300
40
200
20
100
0 re ce 0
ls r atu an
re ria re pe te n
su m at e orc e r ia ls s su eed y t em main
re s f t e re p it g
gp r aw ing ma gp gs id
um mold
in ine he
rs
Defect ted la m ldin illin hh ch Ot
illin hc
aw hf ma
hf ina dr mo Hig priate te
Hig ntam Hig Ba
High Hig
ro qua
o p e
Count C
324 162 30 18 18 12 Ina p 12 Inad 12 6 6
Percent 54.0 27.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0
Cum % 54.0 81.0 86.0 89.0 92.0 94.0 96.0 98.0 99.0 100.0
142 168 158 144 149 146 143 135 144 144
156 154 154 143 144 155 161 162 156 138
Results
155 149 159 151 154 166 139 137 143 147
144 147 164 165 124 155 151 164 166 151
143 158 158 166 156 156 141 143 155 165
134 153 157 150 140 139 164 146 160 139
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/105
142 168 158 144 149 146 143 135 144 144
156 154 154 143 144 155 161 162 156 138
155 149 159 151 154 166 139 137 143 147
154 147 164 165 124 155 151 164 166 151
143 158 158 166 156 156 141 143 155 165
134 153 157 150 140 139 164 146 160 139
Statistics
Range: The difference between the largest and smallest data points
Variance: The average square distance from the mean
Standard Deviation: The square root of the variance.
166 138 143 155 154 183 167 165 159 205
Alternative Brand: 126 148 162 123 131 121 143 135 124 159
Mean = 151, Median = 155, 162 165 169 135 159 120 164 148 110 133
Mode = 143 157 127 199 139 155 161 83 146 167 169
138 156 146 175 143 133 119 143 155 177
148 146 160 167 166 172 168 161 164 148
R = xmax - xmin
Advantages:
Easy to calculate
Same units as original data
Disadvantages:
Uses two data points only
Uses error-prone extreme data points
166 138 143 155 154 183 167 165 159 205
Alternative Brand: 126 148 162 123 131 121 143 135 124 159
Range = 122, Variance = 440.14 162 165 169 135 159 120 164 148 110 133
157 127 199 139 155 161 83 146 167 169
Standard deviation = 20.98 138 156 146 175 143 133 119 143 155 177
148 146 160 167 166 172 168 161 164 148
Divide data into stem, consisting of one or more of the leading digits,
and leaf, consisting of the remaining digits. Record stems only once.
Original
Ordered
The box extends from the first to the third quartiles. Lines
(whiskers) extend from the box to the minimum and maximum
or symmetric percentiles.
160
Pressure
150
140
130
120
10 20 30 40 50 60
Order
THE
NORMAL
LAW OF ERROR
STANDS OUT IN THE
EXPERIENCE OF MANKIND
AS ONE OF THE BROADEST
GENERALISATIONS OF NATURAL
PHILOSOPHY IT SERVES AS THE
GUIDING INSTRUMENT IN RESEARCHES
IN THE PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES AND
IN MEDICINE AGRICULTURE AND ENGINEERING
IT IS AN INDISPENSABLE TOOL FOR THE ANALYSIS AND THE
INTERPRETATION OF THE BASIC DATA OBTAINED BY OBSERVATION AND EXPERIMENT
300
Frequency
200
100
0
152 162 172
height
=2
=4 =4
95%
2.5% 2.5%
-1.96 1.96
Z
x
1 2 3 4
Quality Improvement
Quality improvement is the
reduction of variability in
processes and products.
Alternatively, quality
improvement is also seen as
waste reduction.
Quality Assurance
Continual
Continual Improvement
Improvementof
ofthe
theQMS
QMS
CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS
clause 4
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
clause 7
Input product
product Output
realization product
product
value adding realization value
activities
adding activities
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/142
Documentation Auditing
Why Document?
Accuracy
Repeatability
Consistency
Accountability
Purpose
Purpose of documentation is to:
State quality policy and objectives
Describe organization, products, facilities
Inform employees and customers
Aid auditors
Refer to lower-level documents
Documentation Levels
Level
Policies I
Level
Work Instructions III
(Job/Task)
Why Audit?
The organization shall continually improve the
effectiveness of the QMS through the use of:
management review
quality policy and objectives
analysis of performance data
preventive and corrective actions
regular internal and external audits
Clause 8.5.1
Verifies
VerifiesCA CAby:
by:
Notify
Notifyauditor
auditor visit
visitor
or
obj.
obj.evidence
evidence
Letter/fax
Audit report
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/149
Corrective Preventive
Action Action
Action taken to Action taken to
eliminate cause of eliminate cause of
nonconformity potential nonconformity
Taken to prevent Taken to prevent
recurrence occurrence
Processes
New processes not qualified
Calibration incomplete
Poor reaction to out of control conditions
Management Review
Follow-up on previous meeting
Complaints and customer surveys
Improvement initiatives
Performance data
Corrective actions
Competition situation
Training needs
Technology changes
Imported technologies
Efforts concentrated on shop floor
Quality improvement focus
Respect for people
Elimination of waste
Waste in Operations
(1) Waste from overproduction
(2) Waste of waiting time
(3) Transportation waste
(4) Inventory waste
(5) Processing waste
(6) Waste of motion
(7) Waste from product defects
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/157
Lean Production
Through Waste Elimination
Quality
JIT at the
People
Source
Operational Stability
JIT Goals
Zero defects
Zero excess lot size or lot size of one
Zero setups
Zero breakdowns
Zero handling
Zero lead time
Zero Surging
Level production plan and uniform
product mix
Traditional Method
(Push) Selling
Cost + Profit = Price
Seller Driven
(SELLER)
PROFIT (MARKET)
Modern Method
(Pull)
Customer Driven =
Selling
Price - Cost
Just in Time
History - Japan
1980s conclusion
Japanese industry worked smart - JIT
Think of JIT as minimum stock production
Japanese experience
identify defective
Decision
Paperwork Inspection
backlogs
work from upstream
backlog backlogs
stations, saves the
downstream work
166
Aggregate
MRP2
Plan (product groups)
Firm Forecast
orders random
Master orders
production
schedule
Design Time-phased plan
(MPS)
changes how many + when we
will build each end item.
Bill of
material MRP1
Inventory
record
JIT
Reports Stock
movements
Just-In-Time (JIT)
System for high-volume production with min.
inventory (raw materials, WIP, finished goods).
Involves
timed arrivals @ workstation JIT
A management philosophy
Expose problems & bottlenecks
Take away security blanket
Streamlined production
Factory & warehouse networks
Just-In-Time (JIT)
a system for high-volume production with
minimal inventory (raw materials, WIP, finished
goods).
involves
timed arrivals @ workstation JIT
JIT Requirements:
Design Flow Process: Link
operations, balance workstation
capacities, relayout for flow,
emphasize preventive maintenance,
reduce lot sizes, reduce
setup/changeover time
JIT Requirements 1
Kanban Pull
Demand pull
Back flush
Reduce batch/lot sizes
Work with suppliers
Reduce lead times
Frequent deliveries
Project usage requirements
Quality expectations
Reduce inventory in
Stores
Transit
Conveyors
calculation from MRP & EOQs
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/170
JIT Requirements 2
Quality
Worker responsibility Stabilize Schedule
SQC Level schedule
Enforce compliance Under utilize capacity
Error proof
Automatic inspection
People Focus
Operations Design
Link operations
pay harmonization
Balance workstation capacities supportive unions
Review layout for flow subcontractor networks
Stress preventive maintenance hands-on manager style
Reduce lot sizes quality commitment &
Reduce setup/changeover time group involvement
JIT Requirements 3
Problem-solving
Problem-solving
Rootproblem
Root problem
Long-term solution
Long-term solution
Teamcontribution
Team contribution
Line-specialistcooperation
Line-specialist cooperation
Learning
Learning
Measureperformance
Measure performance
CQI
CQI
Monitor&&report
Monitor report Product Design
Improvement
DFM & process design
Modules & fewer parts
Quality standards
upgrade housekeeping
clarify process flows
revise equipment &
process technologies
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/172
Call
for
Finished
more
Goods
Bin Warehous
Bin
e
Lathe Grinder
Bin JIT
Bin deliveries
Customer
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/174
What is a kanban?
developed at Toyota 1950s to manage line
material flows.
Kanban ( Kan=card, Ban= signal )
simple movement system
cards to signal & communicate
reorder information
boxes/containers to take lots of parts
from one work station to another
(client-server).
Server only delivers components to client
work station as & when needed
(called/pulled).
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/175
What is kanban?
BENEFITS OF KANBAN
KANBAN PRE-CONDITIONS
Point of use
inclusion (all parts Level production
on the assembly line)
There are four
pre-conditions for
the successful
implementation of
Kanban
KANBAN
Function of Kanban
Function of Kanban
Prevents overproduction and excessive
transportation -restricting in-bound raw
material and production quantity of a
process to specific pre-determined lot
quantity indicated on the KB. It allows
ordering of multiple lot quantities only to the
extent of KB available to be replenished
Serves as a work order indicating what has
been produced and identifies the physical
product
Reveals existing production problems and
maintains inventory control
Rules of Kanban
Never send defectives products to
downstream processes
The downstream process draws only what is
required by the KB from upstream processes.
The upstream process produces items in the
quantity and sequence indicated by the KB.
Parts are never to be produced or conveyed
without a KB
KB must be attached to actual containers of
parts
KB is a tool to fine tune production
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/184
3
4
Assembly Withdraw Post Office
Kanban Mailbox
Inter-Process
1
V1 A Kanban Post Office
5
X B
V2 B A C E
B A C E
V3 Y
C
D
V4 D
D
D
V5 Z E A C E
A C E
f
V6 fF
F
withdrawal kanban
Bin Bin
Machine Part A Part A Assembly
Center
Line
Example
A switch is assembled in batches of 4 units
at an upstream work area.
delivered in a bin to a downstream
control-panel assembly area that requires 5
switch assemblies/hour.
The switch assembly area can produce a bin
of switch assemblies in 2 hours.
Safety stock = 10% of needed inventory.
Expected demand during lead time + safety stock
k=
size of container
dL (1+S) 5(2)(1.1)
= = = 2.75 or 3
C 4
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/192
Empty containers
Assembly line 1
O2
Fabrication
cell
O1 O3
Assembly line 2
Full containers
O2
Figure 11.2
Empty containers
Assembly line 1
O2
Fabrication
cell
O1 O3
Assembly line 2
Full containers
O2
Figure 11.2
Empty containers
Assembly line 1
O2
Fabrication
cell
O1 O3
Assembly line 2
Full containers
O2
Figure 11.2
Empty containers
Assembly line 1
O2
Fabrication
cell
O1 O3
Assembly line 2
Full containers
O2
Figure 11.2
Empty containers
Assembly line 1
O2
Fabrication
cell
O1 O3
Assembly line 2
Full containers
O2
Figure 11.2
Empty containers
Assembly line 1
O2
Fabrication
cell
O1 O3
Assembly line 2
Full containers
O2
Figure 11.2
Empty containers
Assembly line 1
O2
Fabrication
cell
O1 O3
Assembly line 2
Full containers
O2
Figure 11.2
Supplier:
Lot Quantity:
Location:
Part Number:
9 Assembly always withdraws from
fabrication (pull system)
KANBAN
9 Containers cannot be moved
without a kanban
9 Containers should contain the
same number of parts
WS 116
Aisle 5
Bin 47
WS 83
1234567Z
9 Only good parts are passed along
9 Production should not exceed
authorization
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/203
Operational Benefits
Reduce space requirements
Reduce inventory investment
Reduce lead times
Increase labor productivity
Increase equipment utilization
Reduce paperwork and simplify
planning systems
Valid priorities for scheduling
Workforce participation
Increase service/product quality
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/204
1. WORK ELEMENTS
2. ELEMENT TIMES
3. PRECEDENCE RELATIONSHIPS
4. DEMAND (OUTPUT RATE)
or
NUMBER OF WORK STATIONS
n k
i=1
ai = ak KC
k=1
K K
Min
k=1
dk = K (Max ak) - ak
k=1
(Convergence Procedure)
I
a = 12.5
Production Volume
i=1 i q = 1300/Week
2 Shifts/day
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/213
1 2 3 6 8
I
a
i=1 i
Km = 12.5 min/piece = 3.4 stations or 4 stations
= c 3.7 min/piece
I
i=1
ai
Cm = = 12.5 min/piece
Km 4 stations
COMMENTS
Twenty principles of MH
Selecting MH methods
Simplifying /eliminating MH
Simple analysis techniques
Material Handling
Yes
WHY WHAT WHERE + WHEN HOW + WHO
?
Q A
etc. D
P E
C
$/unit
Quantity
The greater the amount moved per trip,
the less the cost per unit moved
But:
Creates more inventory
Requires expensive, heavy-duty material
handling equipment
Increases lag time between operations
poor process communication, slower
reaction to quality problems
Requires more floor space
WASTE!
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/235
Systematic Approach
4. Evaluate alternatives
Meet again to rate alternatives using Factor
Analysis
Improvement of MH Systems
Cellular Manufacturing
Eliminate Handling
Eliminate Storage
Eliminate Inventory
Eliminate waste due to poor quality
KEYS:
Efficient layout, scheduling, problem
prevention
Conveyor Systems
Queuing Analysis
Queuing Analysis
Suitable for quick and dirty evaluations when
a high degree of detail is not necessary.
System
Simple Systems
FIFO (FCFS)
Single Server, Single Queue - M/M/1
System
Poisson Arrivals
Exponential Service Times
Figure C.1
Service system
Waiting line
Service
facilities
Priority
rule
Figure C.1
Service system
Waiting line
Service Served
facilities customers
Priority
rule
Figure C.1
Waiting
Line Arrangements
Service facilities
Waiting
Line Arrangements
Service facilities
Waiting
Line
Arrangements
Service
facility
Service Service
facility 1 facility 2
Service
facility 1
Service
facility 2
Service Service
facility 1 facility 3
Service Service
facility 2 facility 4
Service Service
facility 1 facility 2
Service Service
facility 3 facility 4
Routing for : 1
124
Routing for : 2
243
Routing for : 3
3214
(e) Mixed
Probability Distributions
Probability Distributions
Customer Arrivals
Arrival rate = 2/hour
Probability that 4 customers will arrive
(T)n -T
P(n) = e
n!
Probability Distributions
Service Time
Arrival rate = 2/hour Service time = 3/hour
Probability that 4 customers will arrive
16 -2
P(4) = e = 0.090
24
Probability that a customer requires less than 10 minutes
P(t T) = 1 e-T
Probability Distributions
Customer Arrivals
Arrival rate = 2/hour
Probability that 4 customers will arrive
[2(1)]4 -2(1)
P(4) = e
4!
Probability Distributions
Customer Arrivals
Arrival rate = 2/hour
Probability that 4 customers will arrive
16 -2
P(4) = e = 0.090
24
Probability Distributions
Service Time
Arrival rate = 2/hour Service time = 3/hour
Probability that 4 customers will arrive
16 -2
P(4) = e = 0.090
24
Probability that a customer requires less than 10 minutes
Probability Distributions
Service Time
Arrival rate = 2/hour Service time = 3/hour
Probability that 4 customers will arrive
16 -2
P(4) = e = 0.090
24
Probability that a customer requires less than 10 minutes
Operating Characteristics
Line Length
Number of
Customers in System
Waiting Time in Line
Total Time in System
Service Facility Utilization
Single-Server Model
= Average utilization
utilization of the system =
n = Probability that n customers are in the system = (1 )n
1
W = Average time spent in the system, including service =
Utilization = =
30
Utilization = = =
35
30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Average number in system = L = = 6 customers
35 30
30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Average number in system = L = = 6 customers
35 30
30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Average number in system = L = = 6 customers
35 30
30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Average number in system = L = = 6 customers
35 30
30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Average number in system = L = = 6 customers
35 30
1
Average time in system = W =
30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Average number in system = L = = 6 customers
35 30
1
Average time in system = W =
35 30
30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Average number in system = L = = 6 customers
35 30
1
Average time in system = W = = 0.20 hour, or 12 minutes
35 30
30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Average number in system = L = = 6 customers
35 30
1
Average time in system = W = = 0.20 hour, or 12 minutes
35 30
30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Average number in system = L = = 6 customers
35 30
1
Average time in system = W = = 0.20 hour, or 12 minutes
35 30
30
Utilization = = = = 0.857, or 85.7%
35
30
Average number in system = L = = 6 customers
35 30
1
Average time in system = W = = 0.20 hour, or 12 minutes
35 30
30
= = 0.80
37.52
Contents
TVAL Model
Sequence Schedule in JIT
Quantitative Stock Analysis for JIT
Inventory Models
TVAL Model
Toyota Verification of Assembly Line
Measure the workload or fatigue rate of each
assembly line operation
Measuring Equation:
L = 27.03 log t + 53.78 log M 48.76
Where
L = physiological load or fatigue rate (%)
beyond L operator cannot continue
M = ratio of Electro-Motive Force (EMF) to its
max (need EMF meter)
T = sustaining time of an operation
TVAL Model
Past Equation holds regardless of posture
Another posture dependent Equation:
L = d1 log t + d2 log W 162.0
W =task load determined by handling
weight, operation posture, assembling
muscle power, pushing direction,
In a cycling operation: W = 9.31 t0.0129 M0.457
Toyota concluded: fatigue rate < 80 %
Equations would not apply to all situations
Need to develop our own
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/304
Inventory
Economies of scale
Uncertainty in supply and demand
Speculation
Transportation
Smoothing production/purchasing
Logistics
Cost of controlling inventory
Decisions to Make
We have to decide
How often we review the inventory
When we should issue a
(replenishment/production) order
How large the order should be
Demand
Constant (level) or variable
Deterministic (known) or Stochastic (random
or uncertain)
Lead Time
Review Time
Continuous or periodic review
Excess Demand
Backordered or lost
Changing inventory
Inventory-Related Costs
Relevant Costs
Relevant Costs
Relevant Costs
The cost of placing a purchase order from a vendor
include
Order forms
Postage
Telecommunications
Authorization
Purchase order planning
Purchase order entry time
Purchase order processing time
Relevant Costs
The cost of placing a purchase order from a vendor
include
EOQ History
Introduced in 1913 by Ford W. Harris, How Many
Parts to Make at Once
Inventory Management
Inventory Management
Source: Frazelle, Edward H. Supply Chain Strategy. McGraw-Hill Education Group, 2001
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/322
Inventory Management
Source: Frazelle, Edward H. Supply Chain Strategy. McGraw-Hill Education Group, 2001
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/323
Inventory Costs
Interest or
Opportunity Cost
Storage and
Handling Costs
Taxes, Insurance,
and Shrinkage
Inventory Costs
Customer Service
Ordering Cost
Setup Cost
Labor and
Equipment Utilization
Transportation Costs
Payments to Suppliers
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/325
Types of Inventory
Cycle Inventory
Q+0
Average cycle inventory =
2
Pipeline inventory = DL = dL
Types of Inventory
Pipeline inventory = DL = dL
= (70 drills/week)(3 weeks)
= 210 drills
How
Much?
When!
Economic Order
Quantity
EOQ Trade-off
Two interpretations:
If you order more (larger Q), you incur
higher inventory cost, but less setup cost
If you order less frequently, you incur larger
inventory cost, but less setup cost
The trade-off is not linear!
Q Average
cycle
2
inventory
On
1 cycle
Time
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/333
Total cost = HC + OC
Annual cost (dollars)
Lot Size (Q
(Q)
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/334
3000
Q D
Annual cost (dollars)
Total cost = (H
(H) + (S
(S)
2 Q
2000
Q
Holding cost = (H
(H)
2
1000
D
Ordering cost = (S
(S)
Q
0 | | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Lot Size (Q
(Q)
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/335
3000
Q D
Annual cost (dollars)
Total cost = (H
(H) + (S
(S)
2 Q
2000
Connectors costs
Q
Holding cost = (H
(H)
D = (18 /week)(52 weeks) = 936 units 2
H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
S = $45 Q = 390 units
1000
Q D D
Ordering cost = (S
(S)
C= (H) + (S) Q
2 Q
| | | | | | | |
C0
= $2925 + $108 = $3033
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Lot Size (Q
(Q)
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/336
3000
Q D
Annual cost (dollars)
Total cost = (H
(H) + (S
(S)
2 Q
2000
Connectors costs
Q
Holding cost = (H
(H)
D = (18 /week)(52 weeks) = 936 units 2
H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
S = $45 Q = 390 units
1000
Q D D
Ordering cost = (S
(S)
C= (H) + (S) Q
2 Q
| | | | | | | |
C0
= $2925 + $108 = $3033
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Current
Lot Size (Q
(Q)
Q
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/337
Total cost = (H
(H) + (S
(S)
2 Q
2000
Connectors costs
Q
Holding cost = (H
(H)
D = (18 /week)(52 weeks) = 936 units 2
H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
S = $45 Q = 390 units
1000
Q D D
Ordering cost = (S
(S)
C= (H) + (S) Q
2 Q
| | | | | | | |
C0
= $2925 + $108 = $3033
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Current
Lot Size (Q
(Q)
Q
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/338
3000
Q D
Annual cost (dollars)
Total cost = (H
(H) + (S
(S)
2 Q
2000
Connectors costs
Q
Holding cost = (H
(H)
D = (18 /week)(52 weeks) = 936 units 2
H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
S = $45 Q = 468 units
1000
Q D D
Ordering cost = (S
(S)
C= (H) + (S) Q
2 Q
| | | | | | | |
C0
= $3510 + $90 = $3600
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Current
Lot Size (Q
(Q)
Q
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/339
1000
D
Ordering cost = (S
(S)
Q
0 | | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Current
Lot Size (Q
(Q)
Q
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/340
1000
D
Ordering cost = (S
(S)
Q
0 | | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Current
Example Lot Size (Q
(Q)
Q
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/341
0 | | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Current
Example Lot Size (Q
(Q)
Q
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/342
0 | | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Best Q Current
Example Lot Size (Q
(Q)
(EOQ) Q
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/343
0 | | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Best Q Current
Example Lot Size (Q
(Q)
(EOQ) Q
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/344
0 | | | | | | | |
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Best Q Current
Example Lot Size (Q
(Q)
(EOQ) Q
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/345
How
Much?
When!
up
So
Soup
Soup
Continuous Review
IP IP IP
Q Q Q
OH OH OH
On
R
Order Order Order
placed placed placed
L L L Time
TBO TBO TBO
up
So
Soup
Soup
Continuous Review
IP IP IP
Connectors
Q Q Q
R = Average demand during lead time
OH OH = (25)(4) = 100
OH cases
On
R
IP = OH + SR BO
Order Order
placed
= 10 + 200 0Order
placed
= 210 cases
placed placed
L L L Time
TBO TBO TBO
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/348
Uncertain Demand
IP
IP
Order
Order
Order received
received
received Order
received
On--hand inventory
Q
Q Q
OH
R
Order Order Order
On
L1 L2 L3 Time
TBO1 TBO2 TBO3
Cycle-
Cycle-service level = 85%
Probability of stockout
(1.0 0.85 = 0.15)
Average
demand
during
lead time R
zL
zL
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/351
+
75
Demand for week 1
t = 15
+ 225
Demand for
75
Demand for week 2 three-
three-week lead time
t = 15
=
75
Demand for week 3
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/352
+ L = t L =5 2 = 7.1
225
75 Safety stock = zL = 1.28(7.1)Demand
= 9.1 or
for9 units
Demand for week 2 three-
three-week lead time
t = 15
Reorder point = dL + Safety stock
= 2(18) + 9 = 45 units
Example
=
75
Demand for week 3
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/353
+
C=
75
($15) +
936
($45)
225
+ 9($15)
Demand for
75
Demand for week 2
2 75 three-
three-week lead time
t = 15
C = $562.50 + $561.60 + $135 = $1259.10
Example
=
75
Demand for week 3
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/354
Q3
Q1
OH Q2 OH
IP1
IP3
Order Order
On
placed placed
IP2
L L L Time
P P
Protection interval
Q3
Q1 Q
OH OHt = T - IPt
Q2
IP1
T = 400 BO = 5
IP3 OH = 0 SR = 0
Order Order
On
placed placed
IP2 IP = 0 + 0 5 = 5 sets
Q = 400 (5) = 405 sets
L L L Time
P P
Protection interval
Q
t =
Q118 units L = 2 weeks cycle/service level = 90%
3
OH Q2 OH
EOQ = 75 units D = (18 units/week)(52 weeks) = 936 units
IP1
EOQ 75
IP3 P= (52) = (52) = 4.2 or 4 weeks
D 936
Order Order
On
Q3
t =
Q118 units L = 2 weeks cycle/service level = 90%
OH Q2 OH
EOQ = 75 units D = (18 units/week)(52 weeks) = 936 units
IP1
P = 4 weeks T = 123 units
IP3
Order Order
On
P Systems
Convenient to administer
Orders may be combined
IP only required at review
Q Systems
Individual review frequencies
Possible quantity discounts
Lower, less-expensive safety stocks
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/359
EOQ Model
Assumptions:
No Stockouts
Order when no inventory
Order size determines policy
Inventory
Qavg = Q/2
Examples:
MRP
Firm orders and contracts for future periods
Seasonal demand patterns
Demand with trend (increasing or decreasing over
time)
Example:
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Demand 10 15 12 16 15 12 18 14 22 16
Other data
Beginning inventory: 0
Setup cost: $150
Inventory carrying cost: $2 per unit per
period
Quick Solutions
Order every period exactly as much as you need
Lot-for-Lot
Determine a fixed order quantity and order when
you need to order (i.e., when on-hand inventory is
less than the next periods demand)
Example: EOQ
Order constant time-supply (i.e., order the
amount sufficient to cover total demand in next
three months)
Lot-for-lot solution:
P eriod 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total
D em an d 10 15 12 16 15 12 18 14 22 16 150
O rd er 10 15 12 16 15 12 18 14 22 16 150
B eg in n in g I. 10 15 12 16 15 12 18 14 22 16 150
E n d I. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
H old in g C ost 10 15 12 16 15 12 18 14 22 16 150
Other heuristics:
EOQ as a Time Supply
Periodic Order Quantity (POQ)
Part-Period Balancing (PPB)
Silver-Meal (or Least Period Cost)
Example
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Demand 10 15 12 16 15 12 18 14 22 16
Calculate EOQ:
Average demand per week = ____
Holding cost per unit per week = ____
EOQ = ____
Total Holding and Setup Cost = ____
2DS 2(150)(15)
Q =
*
= = 47.43
H 2
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/368
Period 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total
Demand 10 15 12 16 15 12 18 14 22 16 150
Order 48 48 48 48 192
Beginning I. 48 38 23 59 43 28 64 46 32 58
End I. 38 23 11 43 28 16 46 32 10 42
Holding Cost 86 61 34 102 71 44 110 78 42 100 728
P eriod 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total
D em an d 10 15 12 16 15 12 18 14 22 16 150
O rd er 37 43 54 16 150
B eg in n in g I. 37 27 12 43 27 12 54 36 22 16
E n d I. 27 12 0 27 12 0 36 22 0 0
H old in g C os t 64 39 12 70 39 12 90 58 22 16 422
P e rio d 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 To ta l
D em an d 10 15 12 16 15 12 18 14 22 16 150
O rd e r 37 43 32 38 150
B e g in n in g I. 37 27 12 43 27 12 32 14 38 16
E n d I. 27 12 0 27 12 0 14 0 16 0
H o ld in g C o s t 64 39 12 70 39 12 46 14 54 16 366
j =1
t
A
consuming one part in the subsequent stage
Then
S
=
(2 2 )t t
*
The min lot size q
'
S= 20 min
t = 2 min
t = 6 min
Demand during
production interval
On
pd
Time
Figure E.1
Demand during
production interval
On
pd
Time
Production Demand
and demand only
TBO
Figure E.1
Demand during
production interval
On
pd
Time
Production Demand
and demand only
TBO
Figure E.1
Demand during
production interval
Imax
Maximum inventory
On
pd
Time
Production Demand
and demand only
TBO
Figure E.1
Demand during
production interval
Imax
Maximum inventory
pd
Q
( )
On
Imax = (p d) = Q p
pd p
Time
Production Demand
and demand only
TBO
Figure E.1
Demand during
production interval
Imax
Maximum inventory
Imax D
On
C= (H) + (S)
pd 2 Q
Time
Production Demand
and demand only
TBO
Figure E.1
Demand during
production interval
Imax
Maximum inventory
Q pd
) + QD
On
pd
C =2 p ( (S)
Time
Production Demand
and demand only
TBO
Figure E.1
Demand during
production interval
Imax
Maximum inventory
2DS p
On
ELS =
pd H pd
Time
Production Demand
and demand only
TBO
Figure E.1
Example
2DS p
ELS =
H pd
Example
2(10,500)($200) 190
ELS =
$0.21 190 30
Example
2(10,500)($200) 190
ELS =
$0.21 190 30
Example
2(10,500)($200) 190
ELS =
$0.21 190 30
Example
Example
Q pd D
C =2 p (
(H) + (S
Q (
)
S)
Example
Example
C = $430.91 + $430.91
Example
C = $861.82
Example
C = $861.82
ELS
TBOELS = (350 days/year)
D
Example
C = $861.82
4873.4
TBOELS = (350 days/year)
10,500
Example
C = $861.82
ELS
C = $861.82 Production time =
p
4873.4
C = $861.82 Production time =
190
First Second
price price
break break
0 100 200 300
Purchase quantity (Q
(Q)
(a) Total cost curves with purchased materials added
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/410
First Second
price price
break break
0 100 200 300
Purchase quantity (Q
(Q)
(a) Total cost curves with purchased materials added
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/411
PD for
P = $4.00 PD for
P = $3.50 PD for
P = $3.00
First Second
price price
break break
0 100 200 300
Purchase quantity (Q
(Q)
(a) Total cost curves with purchased materials added
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/412
First Second
price price
break break
0 100 200 300 0 100 200 300
Purchase quantity (Q
(Q) Purchase quantity (Q
(Q)
(a) Total cost curves with purchased materials added (b) EOQs and price break quantities
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/413
PD for
P = $4.00 PD for
P = $3.50 PD for
P = $3.00
First Second
price price
break break
0 100 200 300 0 100 200 300
Purchase quantity (Q
(Q) Purchase quantity (Q
(Q)
(a) Total cost curves with purchased materials added (b) EOQs and price break quantities
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/414
PD for
P = $4.00 PD for
P = $3.50 PD for
P = $3.00
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/418
2DS
EOQ57.00 =
H
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/419
2(936)(45)
EOQ57.00 =
0.25(57.00)
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/420
2(936)(45)
EOQ57.00 =
0.25(57.00)
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/421
EOQ57.00 = 77 units
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/422
EOQ57.00 = 77 units
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/423
EOQ57.00 = 77 units
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/424
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/425
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/426
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/427
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/428
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/429
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/430
Q D
C= (H
(H) + (S
(S) + PD
2 Q
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/431
75 936
C75 = [(0.25)($60.00)] + ($45) + $60.00(936)
2 75
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/432
C75 = $57,284
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/433
C75 = $57,284
300 936
C300 = [(0.25)($58.80)] + ($45) + $58.80(936)
2 300
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/434
C75 = $57,284
C300 = $57,382
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/435
C75 = $57,284
C300 = $57,382
500 936
C500 = [(0.25)($57.00)] + ($45) + $57.00(936)
2 500 Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/436
C75 = $57,284
C300 = $57,382
C300 = $56,999
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/437
C75 = $57,284
C300 = $57,382
C300 = $56,999
Example
Lean Manufacturing Elimam & Gaafar 2006/438
Inventory