Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
USOO5587415A
United States Patent [191 [11] Patent Number: 5,587,415
Takeda [45] Date of Patent: Dec. 24, 1996
[54] PROCESS FOR PREPARATION OF [58] Field of Search ................................... .. 524/815, 825,
DISPERSION OF WATER-SOLUBLE 524/458, 460; 210/705, 734, 735
CATIONIC POLYMER THE DISPERSION
PRODUCED THEREBY AND ITS USE [56] References Cited
TABLE 2 Note
5)Polymer dispersion disclosed in Example 1 of EP-A-O183466 (copolymer
Dehydrated of acrylamide and acryloyloxyethyldimethylbenzylanunonium chloride
Filtered Water Sludge (molar ratio 90:10), the viscosity of 0.5% polymer in 1 N NaCl solution is
Employed dispersion Wf (ml) Wd (times) 22.0 c .
5>Powii2r type commercial product (copolymer of acrylamide and acryloy
Example 3 98 4.41 loxyethyltrimethylarnmonium chloride (molar ratio 90:10), the viscosity of
Example 33) 103 4.81 15 0.5% polymer in 4% NaCl solution is 25 cp.)
Sample 4) 105 4.92
As clearly seen from the results in the Table 2, the
Note polymers of the present invention (Examples 1 and 2) give
3)Polymer dispersion disclosed in Example 5 of EP-A-0l83466 (copolymer the paper a higher sizing degree, i.e. water repellent prop
of acrylamide and acryloyloxyethyldimethylbenzylammonium chloride
(molar ratio 65:35), the viscosity of 0.5% polymer in l N sodium sulfate 20
erty, than the comparative samples (Samples 1 and 2). It is
solution is 18 cp.) believed that the higher hydrophobic property of longer
4 owder type commercial product (copolymer of acrylamide and acryloy< alkyl chain of the monomer used in the present invention
loxyethyltrimethylammonium chloride (molar ratio 65:35), the viscosity of caused this advantage.
0.5% polymer in l N sodium sulfate solution is 22 cp.)
Comparing with Samples 3 and 4, ?ltration effect of 25
Example 3, the present invention, is a little inferior to EXAMPLE 7
Samples 3 and 4, but the water content of the dehydrated Using the polymer dispersion produced in the Example 3
sludge shows clear improvement and it is believed this its performance as the drainage aid in the paper process was
improvement has come from the hydrophobicity of the studied.
polymer of the present invention. 30 800 ml of 0.5% pulp suspension (LBKP 100%, CSF 450
ml) was put into a 1000 ml beaker, and Alum (2% per pulp)
EXAMPLE 6 was added to the suspension while stirring the suspension
During paper manufacturing process, a ?xing agent for with Magnetic stirrer. Dispersion polymer samples (0.2%
?xing a rosin sizing agent is often employed in order to aq. as polymer) was added to the suspension to the concen
decrease the added amount of aluminum sulfate. The effect 35 tration of 300 ppm/pulp. The suspension was then fed to
of the polymer dispersions produced in the Examples Tappi Standard Sheet Machine (screen area 1/50 m2) and
according to the present invention are measured when being sheet was prepared. The both side of the sheet (the basis
applied as such a ?xing agent. weight: 200 g/m2) sandwiched between two blankets and
water was squeezed while passing through two calendar
Method for Sizing Test 40 rollers (clearance 2 mm, pressure 5 kglcmz). The pressed
sheet was dried at 120 deg. C. for 3 hours and water content
1. The following agents were added into hardwood was calculated. Three polymer samples as in Example 5, i.e.
bleached kraft pulp in sequential order and the mixture was Example 3 of the present invention, and two comparative
manufactured into paper by a test sheet machine (basis samples, Samples 3 and 4, were used for the test. The results
weight 60 g/m2). 45 were shown in the table 4.