0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
24 visualizzazioni2 pagine
This document summarizes key points about the writ of amparo in the Philippines:
- The writ of amparo was promulgated in 2007 by the Supreme Court to protect against extralegal killings and enforced disappearances. It allows for swift relief through summary proceedings.
- The writ protects the right to security guaranteed by the Constitution, which includes freedom from fear of threats to life, liberty or security, as well as guarantee of bodily and psychological integrity.
- The government has a positive duty to conduct effective investigations of threats and provide protection to victims and their families. Failure to do so violates the right to security and protection by the government.
This document summarizes key points about the writ of amparo in the Philippines:
- The writ of amparo was promulgated in 2007 by the Supreme Court to protect against extralegal killings and enforced disappearances. It allows for swift relief through summary proceedings.
- The writ protects the right to security guaranteed by the Constitution, which includes freedom from fear of threats to life, liberty or security, as well as guarantee of bodily and psychological integrity.
- The government has a positive duty to conduct effective investigations of threats and provide protection to victims and their families. Failure to do so violates the right to security and protection by the government.
This document summarizes key points about the writ of amparo in the Philippines:
- The writ of amparo was promulgated in 2007 by the Supreme Court to protect against extralegal killings and enforced disappearances. It allows for swift relief through summary proceedings.
- The writ protects the right to security guaranteed by the Constitution, which includes freedom from fear of threats to life, liberty or security, as well as guarantee of bodily and psychological integrity.
- The government has a positive duty to conduct effective investigations of threats and provide protection to victims and their families. Failure to do so violates the right to security and protection by the government.
exercised its expanded power in the 1987 Constitution to promulgate rules to protect the Coverage of which is confined to: o Extralegal killings killings committed without due process of the law o Enforced disappearances an arrest, detention or abduction by the government; refusal of the State to disclose the fate or whereabouts places him outside the protection of the law Amparo literally means protection in Spanish. Writ of Amparo originated in Mexico (Yucatan State). Eventually incorporated into the Mexican Constitution in 1847. Spread across the Western hemisphere and eventually to the Philippines. Provides for swift relief because of the summary nature of its proceedings. Only substantial evidence is required. There is still a threat to the life, liberty, and a violation of their right to security of the Manalo brothers because their captors, whom they escaped from, still remain at large. o Right to security is in Art. III, Sec. 2 of the 1987 Constitution. o It is the right to enjoyment of life. Three ways of exercising right to security: o Freedom from fear. Enunciated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) Article 3 Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. I o o p on o l m n om om International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), Art. 9 (1) Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. om om n n threat to the rights to life, liberty or security is the actionable wrong. Fear is a state of mind, a reaction; threat is a stimulus, a cause of action. (PH is a signatory to both conventions) o Guarantee of bodily and psychological integrity or security. Article III, Section II of the 1987 Constitution guarantees against search without warrant ELKs and EDs involve Physical torture, force, and violence are a severe invasion of bodily integrity. It constitutes an invasion of both bodily and psychological integrity as the dignity of the human person includes the exercise of free will Note: The consti also guarantees against torture o G n o p o on o on Go nm n The writ of amparo, this right is built into the guarantees of the right to life and liberty under Article III, Section 1 of the 1987 Constitution and the right to security of person under Article III, Section 2. Protection includes conducting effective investigations, organization of the government apparatus to extend protection to victims of ELKs
and EDs as well as their families
Right to security of persons can exist independently of the right to liberty. (the court cited several cases here, Delgado Paez v. Colombia; Bwaya v. Zambia; Bahamonde v. Equatorial Guinea) They have a positive duty to protect right to liberty and not just a prohibition for arbitrary deprivation of such rights. (ECHR in Kurt v. Turkey) The continuing threat on the life of the Manalo brothers is apparent. This threat vitiates their free will because they are forced to limit their movements and activities. Threats to liberty, security, and life are actionable through a petition for a writ of amparo. The military failed to provide protection for the respondents. They were even the ones who actually tortured them. The one-day investigation conducted by Jimenez was limited, superficial and one-sided. In m on l pon n o om om violated by the apparent threat to their life, liberty and security of person. Their right to security as a guarantee of protection by the government is likewise violated by the ineffective investigation and protection on th p o m l