Sei sulla pagina 1di 2

Issue Brief July 2010

Perspectives and Hopes


for the International
For more information,
please contact:
Conference on
Linda Poteat
Director of Disaster Response
Afghanistan in Kabul
InterAction The route to long-term success in Afghanistan will be found by placing Afghan needs and
lpoteat@interaction.org
priorities first. InterAction and its members are therefore especially pleased that the
th
Natalie Eisenbarth expected focus of the July 20 Kabul Conference is “Afghan priorities for the Afghan
Senior Legislative Associate for people.” A number of InterAction’s member organizations have had humanitarian and
Humanitarian Affairs development operations in Afghanistan for decades and remain committed to working with
InterAction
the Afghan people for years to come.
neisenbarth@interaction.org

While there have been some improvements on the ground, after three decades of conflict,
much is still left to be done. Security is currently the main concern for the Afghan people;
an estimated nine million Afghans now live in conflict-affected areas, often in desperate
conditions with little outside support. Insurgency, criminality, factional conflicts, corruption
and the drug trade seriously hamper access to basic services and the delivery of aid.
Human development indicators remain low: nearly half of the country’s population lives in
poverty and one in five children will not live to see their fifth birthday. High unemployment
continues to undermine stability and state institutions remain weak and have limited
capacity to provide basic services.

The Kabul Conference offers an opportunity for the Afghan government, the United
Nations, international delegations, the international aid community and civil society to
demonstrate a genuine commitment to the Afghan people by addressing their
humanitarian and development priorities. A key outcome of the conference should
therefore be to reinvigorate and support the Afghanistan National Development Strategy
(ANDS). The fact that the Afghan government has now laid out 23 priority programs in
such areas as governance, development, peace and security ahead of the Kabul
Conference is a positive step forward. However, these plans and programs will only bear
fruit if they are followed by a realistic plan of action, committed implementation, and a
process that is broadly inclusive of and monitored by all parties, including civil society
www.InterAction.org actors.

Therefore, we urge close attention to the following recommendations:


1400 16th Street, NW
Suite 210 Increase funding for humanitarian activities and prioritize improved access to
Washington, DC 20036
vulnerable populations. Approximately 320,000 Afghans are currently displaced within
202.667.8227
the country and many lack access to the most basic services. Earthquakes, floods,
droughts and harsh winter conditions have all severely Improve the delivery of services throughout the
affected the country in past years. 2010 has been no country at the local level. More financial and technical
different. These conditions, coupled with the upsurge in resources must be devoted to strengthening the ability of
violence and spotty access to needy populations, have line ministries and local government institutions to promote
exacerbated long-standing, unmet humanitarian needs. All social and economic development, particularly in
parties should maintain a focus on addressing urgent agriculture, rural and urban development, health,
humanitarian issues. education and rule of law. At the same time, a sound,
transparent and accountable decentralization process
Ensure international assistance is driven by Afghan must be supported in order to build the capacities of
and long-term development needs, not short-term provinces, districts and local, community-based
political objectives. Quick impact projects intended to institutions. Such a process should also promote broader
achieve short-term results are not sufficiently promoting public participation that is inclusive of minorities, women
local ownership, capacity-building and sustainability. and vulnerable community members. This cannot be done
Instead, longer-term programs based on needs outlined in in a short timeframe since capacity at the sub-national
the ANDS should be prioritized. For example, national level is extremely limited and gaining the trust of
programs such as the National Solidarity Program (NSP) communities for participation in the development process
and the Basic Package of Health Services (BPHS) have will take time. Both international and national NGOs have
been responsive to and successful in meeting community- developed critical expertise and experience in recovery
identified needs in thousands of villages. It is critical that and development work at the local level and can play an
such programs be comprehensively resourced under important role in building the necessary capacity of
ANDS and implemented across Afghanistan, keeping indigenous institutions while also rebuilding the critical link
development outcomes, rather than political concerns, at between local communities and national institutions.
the forefront.
Strengthen the existing coordination mechanism for
Give particular attention to vulnerable groups. A the delivery of humanitarian and development aid. In
centerpiece of the Kabul Conference will be discussing order to make assistance more proactive, inclusive,
plans for advancing a peace process and reconciliation transparent and efficient, it is the responsibility of all parties
with ex-combatants. In such negotiations, the U.S. and – international and national NGOs, Afghan authorities, UN
other international actors should stand squarely in favor of and donors – to be mutually accountable in their actions
establishing a firm policy against human rights abuses and and to act in the interest of the Afghan people.
guaranteeing women’s participation in the public sphere.
All parties should prioritize the protection of vulnerable
groups including women, children and the disabled.

Deliver assistance equitably throughout the country.


Currently a disproportionate share of resources is focused
on areas that are insecure and where foreign forces are
present. This approach neglects provinces where the
security and development environments are more
permissive (in the North and West, for example), social
and government capacity are greater, and where
humanitarian needs also remain urgent due to food
insecurity, drought and floods and lack of basic services
and infrastructure. With security conditions and popular
support for the government declining across the country, it
makes sense to address humanitarian and development
needs wherever possible and most effective.

Potrebbero piacerti anche