Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
A transformer is an electrical device that transfers energy between two circuits through
electromagnetic induction. Transformers may be used in voltage conversion to transform an
AC voltage from one voltage level on the input of the device to another level at the output
terminals, to provide for different requirements of current level as an alternating current
source, or it may be used for impedance matching between mismatched electrical circuits to
effect maximum power transfer between the circuits.
A transformer most commonly consists of two windings of wire wound around a common
core to effect tight electromagnetic coupling between the windings. The core material is often
a laminated iron core. The coil that receives the electrical input energy is referred to as the
primary winding, while the output coil is called the secondary winding.
An alternating electric current flowing through the primary winding (coil) of a transformer
generates an electromagnetic field in its surroundings and a varying magnetic flux in the core
of the transformer. By electromagnetic induction this magnetic flux generates a varying
electromotive force in the secondary winding, resulting in a voltage across the output
terminals. If a load impedance is connected across the secondary winding, a current flows
through the secondary winding drawing power from the primary winding and its power
source.
A transformer cannot operate with direct current, but produces a short output pulse as the
voltage rises when connected to the DC source.
Contents
1 Invention
2 Applications
3 Basic principles
5 Construction
6 Classification parameters
7 Types
8 Applications
9 History
10 See also
11 Notes
12 References
13 Bibliography
14 External links
Invention
The invention of transformers during the late 1800s allowed for longer-distance, cheaper, and
more energy efficient transmission, distribution, and utilization of electrical energy. In the
early days of commercial electric power, the main energy source was direct current (DC),
which operates at low-voltage high-current. According to Joule's Law, energy losses are
directly proportional to the square of current. This law revealed that even a tiny decrease in
current or rise in voltage can cause a substantial lowering in energy losses and costs. Thus,
the historical pursuit for a high-voltage low-current electricity transmission system took
shape. Although high voltage transmission systems offered many benefits, the future fate of
high-voltage alternating current still remained unclear for several reasons: high-voltage
sources had a much higher risk of causing severe electrical injuries; many essential
appliances could only function at low voltage. Regarded as one of the most influential
electrical innovations of all time, the introduction of transformers had successfully reduced
the safety concerns associated with alternating current and had the ability to lower voltage to
a value that was required by most essential appliances. [3]
Applications
Transformers perform voltage conversion; isolation protection; and impedance matching. In
terms of voltage conversion, transformers can step-up voltage/step-down current from
generators to high-voltage transmission lines, and step-down voltage/step-up current to local
distribution circuits or industrial customers. The step-up transformer is used to increase the
secondary voltage relative to the primary voltage, whereas the step-down transformer is used
to decrease the secondary voltage relative to the primary voltage. Transformers range in size
from thumbnail-sized used in microphones to units weighing hundreds of tons
interconnecting the power grid. A broad range of transformer designs are used in electronic
and electric power applications, including miniature, audio, isolation, high-frequency, power
conversion transformers, etc.
Basic principles
The functioning of a transformer is based on two principles of the laws of electromagnetic
induction: An electric current through a conductor, such as a wire, produces a magnetic field
surrounding the wire, and a changing magnetic field in the vicinity of a wire induces a
voltage across the ends of that wire.
The magnetic field excited in the primary coil gives rise to self-induction as well as mutual
induction between coils. This self-induction counters the excited field to such a degree that
the resulting current through the primary winding is very small when no load draws power
from the secondary winding.
The physical principles of the inductive behavior of the transformer are most readily
understood and formalized when making some assumptions to construct a simple model
which is called the ideal transformer. This model differs from real transformers by assuming
that the transformer is perfectly constructed and by neglecting that electrical or magnetic
losses occur in the materials used to construct the device.
Ideal transformer
Ideal transformer with a source and a load. NP and NS are the number of turns in the primary
and secondary windings respectively.
Flux is confined within the magnetic core. Therefore, it is the same flux that links the
input and output windings.
Permeability of the core is infinitely high which implies that net mmf (amp-turns)
must be zero (otherwise there would be infinite flux) hence IP NP - IS NS = 0.
The transformer core does not suffer magnetic hysteresis or Eddy currents, which
cause inductive loss.
If the secondary winding of an ideal transformer has no load, no current flows in the primary
winding.
The circuit diagram (right) shows the conventions used for an ideal, i.e. lossless and
perfectly-coupled transformer having primary and secondary windings with NP and NS turns,
respectively.
The ideal transformer induces secondary voltage VS as a proportion of the primary voltage VP
and respective winding turns as given by the equation
where,
a is the winding turns ratio, the value of these ratios being respectively higher and
lower than unity for step-down and step-up transformers,[4][5][a][b]
VP designates source impressed voltage,
VS designates output voltage, and,
According to this formalism, when the number of turns in the primary coil is greater than the
number of turns in the secondary coil, the secondary voltage is smaller than the primary
voltage. On the other hand, when the number of turns in the primary coil is less than the
number of turns in the secondary, the secondary voltage is greater than the primary voltage.
Any load impedance ZL connected to the ideal transformer's secondary winding allows
energy to flow without loss from primary to secondary circuits. The resulting input and
output apparent power are equal as given by the equation
Combining the two equations yields the following ideal transformer identity
.
This formula is a reasonable approximation for the typical commercial transformer, with
voltage ratio and winding turns ratio both being inversely proportional to the corresponding
current ratio.
The load impedance ZL and secondary voltage VS determine the secondary current IS as
follows
The apparent impedance ZL' of this secondary circuit load referred to the primary winding
circuit is governed by a squared turns ratio multiplication factor relationship derived as
follows[7][8]
For an ideal transformer, the power supplied to the primary and the power dissipated by the
load are equal. If ZL = RL where RL is a pure resistance then the power is given by:[9][10]
Induction law
A varying electrical current passing through the primary coil creates a varying magnetic field
around the coil which induces a voltage in the secondary winding. The primary and
secondary windings are wrapped around a core of very high magnetic permeability, usually
iron,[c] so that most of the magnetic flux passes through both the primary and secondary coils.
Any secondary winding connected load causes current and voltage induction from primary to
secondary circuits in indicated directions.
Ideal transformer and induction law
The voltage induced across the secondary coil may be calculated from Faraday's law of
induction, which states that:
where Vs = Es is the instantaneous voltage, Ns is the number of turns in the secondary coil,
and d/dt is the derivative[d] of the magnetic flux through one turn of the coil. If the turns
of the coil are oriented perpendicularly to the magnetic field lines, the flux is the product of
the magnetic flux density B and the area A through which it cuts. The area is constant, being
equal to the cross-sectional area of the transformer core, whereas the magnetic field varies
with time according to the excitation of the primary. Since the same magnetic flux passes
through both the primary and secondary coils in an ideal transformer,[7] the instantaneous
voltage across the primary winding equals
Taking the ratio of the above two equations gives the same voltage ratio and turns ratio
relationship shown above, that is,
The changing magnetic field induces an emf across each winding.[11] The primary emf, acting
as it does in opposition to the primary voltage, is sometimes termed the counter emf.[12] This
is in accordance with Lenz's law, which states that induction of emf always opposes
development of any such change in magnetic field.
As still lossless and perfectly-coupled, the transformer still behaves as described above in the
ideal transformer.
Polarity
The relationships of the instantaneous polarity at each of the terminals of the windings of a
transformer depend on the direction the windings are wound around the core. Identically
wound windings produce the same polarity of voltage at the corresponding terminals. This
relationship is usually denoted by the dot convention in transformer circuit diagrams,
nameplates, and on terminal markings, which marks the terminals having an in-phase
relationship.[13][14][15][e][f]
Real transformer
The ideal transformer model neglects the following basic linear aspects in real transformers.
Hysteresis losses due to nonlinear application of the voltage applied in the transformer
core, and
Eddy current losses due to joule heating in the core that are proportional to the square
of the transformer's applied voltage.
Whereas windings in the ideal model have no impedance, the windings in a real transformer
have finite non-zero impedances in the form of:
Leakage flux that escapes from the core and passes through one winding only
resulting in primary and secondary reactive impedance.
If a voltage is applied across the primary terminals of a real transformer while the secondary
winding is open without load, the real transformer must be viewed as a simple inductor with
an impedance Z:
.
Leakage flux
The ideal transformer model assumes that all flux generated by the primary winding links all
the turns of every winding, including itself. In practice, some flux traverses paths that take it
outside the windings.[19] Such flux is termed leakage flux, and results in leakage inductance in
series with the mutually coupled transformer windings.[12] Leakage flux results in energy
being alternately stored in and discharged from the magnetic fields with each cycle of the
power supply. It is not directly a power loss, but results in inferior voltage regulation, causing
the secondary voltage not to be directly proportional to the primary voltage, particularly
under heavy load.[19] Transformers are therefore normally designed to have very low leakage
inductance. Nevertheless, it is impossible to eliminate all leakage flux because it plays an
essential part in the operation of the transformer. The combined effect of the leakage flux and
the electric field around the windings is what transfers energy from the primary to the
secondary.[20]
In some applications increased leakage is desired, and long magnetic paths, air gaps, or
magnetic bypass shunts may deliberately be introduced in a transformer design to limit the
short-circuit current it will supply.[12] Leaky transformers may be used to supply loads that
exhibit negative resistance, such as electric arcs, mercury vapor lamps, and neon signs or for
safely handling loads that become periodically short-circuited such as electric arc welders.[21]
Air gaps are also used to keep a transformer from saturating, especially audio-frequency
transformers in circuits that have a DC component flowing in the windings.[22]
Knowledge of leakage inductance is also useful when transformers are operated in parallel. It
can be shown that if the percent impedance (Z) and associated winding leakage reactance-to-
resistance (X/R) ratio of two transformers were hypothetically exactly the same, the
transformers would share power in proportion to their respective volt-ampere ratings (e.g.
500 kVA unit in parallel with 1,000 kVA unit, the larger unit would carry twice the current).
However, the impedance tolerances of commercial transformers are significant. Also, the Z
impedance and X/R ratio of different capacity transformers tends to vary, corresponding
1,000 kVA and 500 kVA units' values being, to illustrate, respectively, Z ~ 5.75%, X/R ~ 3.75
and Z ~ 5%, X/R ~ 4.75.[23][24]
Equivalent circuit
Winding joule losses and leakage reactances are represented by the following series loop
impedances of the model:
Core loss and reactance is represented by the following shunt leg impedances of the model:
Core losses are caused mostly by hysteresis and eddy current effects in the core and are
proportional to the square of the core flux for operation at a given frequency.[26] The finite
permeability core requires a magnetizing current IM to maintain mutual flux in the core.
Magnetizing current is in phase with the flux, the relationship between the two being non-
linear due to saturation effects. However, all impedances of the equivalent circuit shown are
by definition linear and such non-linearity effects are not typically reflected in transformer
equivalent circuits.[26] With sinusoidal supply, core flux lags the induced emf by 90. With
open-circuited secondary winding, magnetizing branch current I0 equals transformer no-load
current.[25]
The resulting model, though sometimes termed 'exact' equivalent circuit based on linearity
assumptions, retains a number of approximations.[25] Analysis may be simplified by assuming
that magnetizing branch impedance is relatively high and relocating the branch to the left of
the primary impedances. This introduces error but allows combination of primary and
referred secondary resistances and reactances by simple summation as two series impedances.
Transformer equivalent circuit impedance and transformer ratio parameters can be derived
from the following tests: open-circuit test,[g] short-circuit test, winding resistance test, and
transformer ratio test.
If the flux in the core is purely sinusoidal, the relationship for either winding between its rms
voltage Erms of the winding, and the supply frequency f, number of turns N, core cross-
sectional area a in m2 and peak magnetic flux density Bpeak in Wb/m2 or T (tesla) is given by
the universal emf equation:[18]
If the flux does not contain even harmonics the following equation can be used for half-cycle
average voltage Eavg of any waveshape:
The time-derivative term in Faraday's Law shows that the flux in the core is the integral with
respect to time of the applied voltage.[28] Hypothetically an ideal transformer would work
with direct-current excitation, with the core flux increasing linearly with time.[29] In practice,
the flux rises to the point where magnetic saturation of the core occurs, causing a large
increase in the magnetizing current and overheating the transformer. All practical
transformers must therefore operate with alternating (or pulsed direct) current.[29]
The emf of a transformer at a given flux density increases with frequency.[18] By operating at
higher frequencies, transformers can be physically more compact because a given core is able
to transfer more power without reaching saturation and fewer turns are needed to achieve the
same impedance. However, properties such as core loss and conductor skin effect also
increase with frequency. Aircraft and military equipment employ 400 Hz power supplies
which reduce core and winding weight.[30] Conversely, frequencies used for some railway
electrification systems were much lower (e.g. 16.7 Hz and 25 Hz) than normal utility
frequencies (50 60 Hz) for historical reasons concerned mainly with the limitations of early
electric traction motors. As such, the transformers used to step-down the high over-head line
voltages (e.g. 15 kV) were much heavier for the same power rating than those designed only
for the higher frequencies.
Operation of a transformer at its designed voltage but at a higher frequency than intended will
lead to reduced magnetizing current. At a lower frequency, the magnetizing current will
increase. Operation of a transformer at other than its design frequency may require
assessment of voltages, losses, and cooling to establish if safe operation is practical. For
example, transformers may need to be equipped with 'volts per hertz' over-excitation relays to
protect the transformer from overvoltage at higher than rated frequency.
One example of state-of-the-art design is traction transformers used for electric multiple unit
and high-speed train service operating across the country border and using different electrical
standards, such transformers' being restricted to be positioned below the passenger
compartment. The power supply to, and converter equipment being supply by, such traction
transformers have to accommodate different input frequencies and voltage (ranging from as
high as 50 Hz down to 16.7 Hz and rated up to 25 kV) while being suitable for multiple AC
asynchronous motor and DC converters & motors with varying harmonics mitigation filtering
requirements.
Large power transformers are vulnerable to insulation failure due to transient voltages with
high-frequency components, such as caused in switching or by lightning.[31]
Energy losses
A 'theoretical' (or 'ideal') transformer does not experience energy losses (i.e., its 100%
efficient), so the power dissipated by its load would be equal to the power supplied by its
primary source. Contrarily, a 'practical' (or 'real') transformer does experience energy losses
(its typically 95 to 99% efficient) due to a variety of loss mechanisms, including winding
resistance, winding capacitance, leakage flux, core losses, and hysteresis loss. Larger
transformers are generally more efficient, and those rated for electricity distribution usually
perform better than 98%.[32]
Experimental transformers using superconducting windings achieve efficiencies of 99.85%.
[33]
The increase in efficiency can save considerable energy, and hence money, in a large
heavily loaded transformer; the trade-off is in the additional initial and running cost of the
superconducting design.
As transformer losses vary with load, it is often useful to express these losses in terms of no-
load loss, full-load loss, half-load loss, and so on. Hysteresis and eddy current losses are
constant at all loads and dominate overwhelmingly at no-load, variable winding joule losses
dominating increasingly as load increases. The no-load loss can be significant, so that even an
idle transformer constitutes a drain on the electrical supply and a running cost. Designing
transformers for lower loss requires a larger core, good-quality silicon steel, or even
amorphous steel for the core and thicker wire, increasing initial cost so that there is a trade-
off between initial cost and running cost (also see energy efficient transformer).[34]
where, f is the frequency, is the hysteresis coefficient and max is the maximum flux
density, the empirical exponent of which varies from about 1.4 to 1 .8 but is often
given as 1.6 for iron.[34][35][36]
Eddy current losses
Ferromagnetic materials are also good conductors and a core made from such a
material also constitutes a single short-circuited turn throughout its entire length.
Eddy currents therefore circulate within the core in a plane normal to the flux, and are
responsible for resistive heating of the core material. The eddy current loss is a
complex function of the square of supply frequency and inverse square of the material
thickness.[34] Eddy current losses can be reduced by making the core of a stack of
plates electrically insulated from each other, rather than a solid block; all transformers
operating at low frequencies use laminated or similar cores.
Magnetostriction related transformer hum
Magnetic flux in a ferromagnetic material, such as the core, causes it to physically
expand and contract slightly with each cycle of the magnetic field, an effect known as
magnetostriction, the frictional energy of which produces an audible noise known as
mains hum or transformer hum.[4][37] This transformer hum is especially objectionable
in transformers supplied at power frequencies[h] and in high-frequency flyback
transformers associated with PAL system CRTs.
Stray losses
Leakage inductance is by itself largely lossless, since energy supplied to its magnetic
fields is returned to the supply with the next half-cycle. However, any leakage flux
that intercepts nearby conductive materials such as the transformer's support structure
will give rise to eddy currents and be converted to heat.[38] There are also radiative
losses due to the oscillating magnetic field but these are usually small.
Mechanical vibration and audible noise transmission
In addition to magnetostriction, the alternating magnetic field causes fluctuating
forces between the primary and secondary windings. This energy incites vibration
transmission in interconnected metalwork, thus amplifying audible transformer hum.
[39]
Closed-core transformers are constructed in 'core form' or 'shell form'. When windings
surround the core, the transformer is core form; when windings are surrounded by the core,
the transformer is shell form. Shell form design may be more prevalent than core form design
for distribution transformer applications due to the relative ease in stacking the core around
winding coils.[40] Core form design tends to, as a general rule, be more economical, and
therefore more prevalent, than shell form design for high voltage power transformer
applications at the lower end of their voltage and power rating ranges (less than or equal to,
nominally, 230 kV or 75 MVA). At higher voltage and power ratings, shell form transformers
tend to be more prevalent.[40][41][42][43] Shell form design tends to be preferred for extra high
voltage and higher MVA applications because, though more labor-intensive to manufacture,
shell form transformers are characterized as having inherently better kVA-to-weight ratio,
better short-circuit strength characteristics and higher immunity to transit damage.[43]
Construction
Cores
Power transformer inrush current caused by residual flux at switching instant; flux (green),
iron core's magnetic characteristics (red) and magnetizing current (blue).
Transformers for use at power or audio frequencies typically have cores made of high
permeability silicon steel.[44] The steel has a permeability many times that of free space and
the core thus serves to greatly reduce the magnetizing current and confine the flux to a path
which closely couples the windings.[45] Early transformer developers soon realized that cores
constructed from solid iron resulted in prohibitive eddy current losses, and their designs
mitigated this effect with cores consisting of bundles of insulated iron wires.[46] Later designs
constructed the core by stacking layers of thin steel laminations, a principle that has remained
in use. Each lamination is insulated from its neighbors by a thin non-conducting layer of
insulation.[47] The universal transformer equation indicates a minimum cross-sectional area
for the core to avoid saturation.
The effect of laminations is to confine eddy currents to highly elliptical paths that enclose
little flux, and so reduce their magnitude. Thinner laminations reduce losses,[48] but are more
laborious and expensive to construct.[49] Thin laminations are generally used on high-
frequency transformers, with some of very thin steel laminations able to operate up to
10 kHz.
Laminating the core greatly reduces eddy-current losses
One common design of laminated core is made from interleaved stacks of E-shaped steel
sheets capped with I-shaped pieces, leading to its name of 'E-I transformer'.[49] Such a design
tends to exhibit more losses, but is very economical to manufacture. The cut-core or C-core
type is made by winding a steel strip around a rectangular form and then bonding the layers
together. It is then cut in two, forming two C shapes, and the core assembled by binding the
two C halves together with a steel strap.[49] They have the advantage that the flux is always
oriented parallel to the metal grains, reducing reluctance.
A steel core's remanence means that it retains a static magnetic field when power is removed.
When power is then reapplied, the residual field will cause a high inrush current until the
effect of the remaining magnetism is reduced, usually after a few cycles of the applied AC
waveform.[50] Overcurrent protection devices such as fuses must be selected to allow this
harmless inrush to pass. On transformers connected to long, overhead power transmission
lines, induced currents due to geomagnetic disturbances during solar storms can cause
saturation of the core and operation of transformer protection devices.[51]
Distribution transformers can achieve low no-load losses by using cores made with low-loss
high-permeability silicon steel or amorphous (non-crystalline) metal alloy. The higher initial
cost of the core material is offset over the life of the transformer by its lower losses at light
load.[52]
Solid cores
Powdered iron cores are used in circuits such as switch-mode power supplies that operate
above mains frequencies and up to a few tens of kilohertz. These materials combine high
magnetic permeability with high bulk electrical resistivity. For frequencies extending beyond
the VHF band, cores made from non-conductive magnetic ceramic materials called ferrites
are common.[49] Some radio-frequency transformers also have movable cores (sometimes
called 'slugs') which allow adjustment of the coupling coefficient (and bandwidth) of tuned
radio-frequency circuits.
Toroidal cores
Small toroidal core transformer
Toroidal transformers are built around a ring-shaped core, which, depending on operating
frequency, is made from a long strip of silicon steel or permalloy wound into a coil, powdered
iron, or ferrite.[53] A strip construction ensures that the grain boundaries are optimally aligned,
improving the transformer's efficiency by reducing the core's reluctance. The closed ring
shape eliminates air gaps inherent in the construction of an E-I core.[21] The cross-section of
the ring is usually square or rectangular, but more expensive cores with circular cross-
sections are also available. The primary and secondary coils are often wound concentrically
to cover the entire surface of the core. This minimizes the length of wire needed, and also
provides screening to minimize the core's magnetic field from generating electromagnetic
interference.
Toroidal transformers are more efficient than the cheaper laminated E-I types for a similar
power level. Other advantages compared to E-I types, include smaller size (about half), lower
weight (about half), less mechanical hum (making them superior in audio amplifiers), lower
exterior magnetic field (about one tenth), low off-load losses (making them more efficient in
standby circuits), single-bolt mounting, and greater choice of shapes. The main disadvantages
are higher cost and limited power capacity (see Classification parameters below). Because of
the lack of a residual gap in the magnetic path, toroidal transformers also tend to exhibit
higher inrush current, compared to laminated E-I types.
Ferrite toroidal cores are used at higher frequencies, typically between a few tens of kilohertz
to hundreds of megahertz, to reduce losses, physical size, and weight of inductive
components. A drawback of toroidal transformer construction is the higher labor cost of
winding. This is because it is necessary to pass the entire length of a coil winding through the
core aperture each time a single turn is added to the coil. As a consequence, toroidal
transformers rated more than a few kVA are uncommon. Small distribution transformers may
achieve some of the benefits of a toroidal core by splitting it and forcing it open, then
inserting a bobbin containing primary and secondary windings.
Air cores
Electronic symbol for Air Cores
A physical core is not an absolute requisite and a functioning transformer can be produced
simply by placing the windings near each other, an arrangement termed an 'air-core'
transformer. The air which comprises the magnetic circuit is essentially lossless, and so an
air-core transformer eliminates loss due to hysteresis in the core material.[12] The leakage
inductance is inevitably high, resulting in very poor regulation, and so such designs are
unsuitable for use in power distribution.[12] They have however very high bandwidth, and are
frequently employed in radio-frequency applications,[54] for which a satisfactory coupling
coefficient is maintained by carefully overlapping the primary and secondary windings.
They're also used for resonant transformers such as Tesla coils where they can achieve
reasonably low loss in spite of the high leakage inductance.
Windings
The conducting material used for the windings depends upon the application, but in all cases
the individual turns must be electrically insulated from each other to ensure that the current
travels throughout every turn.[55] For small power and signal transformers, in which currents
are low and the potential difference between adjacent turns is small, the coils are often wound
from enamelled magnet wire, such as Formvar wire. Larger power transformers operating at
high voltages may be wound with copper rectangular strip conductors insulated by oil-
impregnated paper and blocks of pressboard.[56]
Cut view through transformer windings. White: insulator. Green spiral: Grain oriented silicon
steel. Black: Primary winding made of oxygen-free copper. Red: Secondary winding. Top
left: Toroidal transformer. Right: C-core, but E-core would be similar. The black windings are
made of film. Top: Equally low capacitance between all ends of both windings. Since most
cores are at least moderately conductive they also need insulation. Bottom: Lowest
capacitance for one end of the secondary winding needed for low-power high-voltage
transformers. Bottom left: Reduction of leakage inductance would lead to increase of
capacitance.
The windings of signal transformers minimize leakage inductance and stray capacitance to
improve high-frequency response. Coils are split into sections, and those sections interleaved
between the sections of the other winding.
Power-frequency transformers may have taps at intermediate points on the winding, usually
on the higher voltage winding side, for voltage adjustment. Taps may be manually
reconnected, or a manual or automatic switch may be provided for changing taps. Automatic
on-load tap changers are used in electric power transmission or distribution, on equipment
such as arc furnace transformers, or for automatic voltage regulators for sensitive loads.
Audio-frequency transformers, used for the distribution of audio to public address
loudspeakers, have taps to allow adjustment of impedance to each speaker. A center-tapped
transformer is often used in the output stage of an audio power amplifier in a push-pull
circuit. Modulation transformers in AM transmitters are very similar.
Dry-type transformer winding insulation systems can be either of standard open-wound 'dip-
and-bake' construction or of higher quality designs that include vacuum pressure
impregnation (VPI), vacuum pressure encapsulation (VPE), and cast coil encapsulation
processes.[57] In the VPI process, a combination of heat, vacuum and pressure is used to
thoroughly seal, bind, and eliminate entrained air voids in the winding polyester resin
insulation coat layer, thus increasing resistance to corona. VPE windings are similar to VPI
windings but provide more protection against environmental effects, such as from water, dirt
or corrosive ambients, by multiple dips including typically in terms of final epoxy coat.[58]
Cooling
To place the cooling problem in perspective, the accepted rule of thumb is that the life
expectancy of insulation in all electric machines including all transformers is halved for about
every 7C to 10C increase in operating temperature, this life expectancy halving rule
holding more narrowly when the increase is between about 7C to 8C in the case of
transformer winding cellulose insulation.[59][60][61]
Small dry-type and liquid-immersed transformers are often self-cooled by natural convection
and radiation heat dissipation. As power ratings increase, transformers are often cooled by
forced-air cooling, forced-oil cooling, water-cooling, or combinations of these.[62] Large
transformers are filled with transformer oil that both cools and insulates the windings.[63]
Transformer oil is a highly refined mineral oil that cools the windings and insulation by
circulating within the transformer tank. The mineral oil and paper insulation system has been
extensively studied and used for more than 100 years. It is estimated that 50% of power
transformers will survive 50 years of use, that the average age of failure of power
transformers is about 10 to 15 years, and that about 30% of power transformer failures are
due to insulation and overloading failures.[64][65] Prolonged operation at elevated temperature
degrades insulating properties of winding insulation and dielectric coolant, which not only
shortens transformer life but can ultimately lead to catastrophic transformer failure.[59] With a
great body of empirical study as a guide, transformer oil testing including dissolved gas
analysis provides valuable maintenance information. This underlines the need to monitor,
model, forecast and manage oil and winding conductor insulation temperature conditions
under varying, possibly difficult, power loading conditions.[66][67]
The tank of liquid filled transformers often has radiators through which the liquid coolant
circulates by natural convection or fins. Some large transformers employ electric fans for
forced-air cooling, pumps for forced-liquid cooling, or have heat exchangers for water-
cooling.[63] An oil-immersed transformer may be equipped with a Buchholz relay, which,
depending on severity of gas accumulation due to internal arcing, is used to either alarm or
de-energize the transformer.[50] Oil-immersed transformer installations usually include fire
protection measures such as walls, oil containment, and fire-suppression sprinkler systems.
Another protection means consists in fast depressurization systems which are activated by the
first dynamic pressure peak of the shock wave, avoiding transformer explosion before static
pressure increases. Many explosions are reported to have been avoided thanks to this
technology.[69]
Polychlorinated biphenyls have properties that once favored their use as a dielectric coolant,
though concerns over their environmental persistence led to a widespread ban on their use.[70]
Today, non-toxic, stable silicone-based oils, or fluorinated hydrocarbons may be used where
the expense of a fire-resistant liquid offsets additional building cost for a transformer vault.[68]
[71]
PCBs for new equipment was banned in 1981 and in 2000 for use in existing equipment in
United Kingdom[72] Legislation enacted in Canada between 1977 and 1985 essentially bans
PCB use in transformers manufactured in or imported into the country after 1980, the
maximum allowable level of PCB contamination in existing mineral oil transformers being
50 ppm.[73]
Some transformers, instead of being liquid-filled, have their windings enclosed in sealed,
pressurized tanks and cooled by nitrogen or sulfur hexafluoride gas.[71]
Experimental power transformers in the 500-to-1,000 kVA range have been built with liquid
nitrogen or helium cooled superconducting windings, which eliminates winding losses
without affecting core losses.[74][75]
Insulation drying
Construction of oil-filled transformers requires that the insulation covering the windings be
thoroughly dried of residual moisture before the oil is introduced. Drying is carried out at the
factory, and may also be required as a field service. Drying may be done by circulating hot air
around the core, or by vapor-phase drying (VPD) where an evaporated solvent transfers heat
by condensation on the coil and core.
For small transformers, resistance heating by injection of current into the windings is used.
The heating can be controlled very well, and it is energy efficient. The method is called low-
frequency heating (LFH) since the current used is at a much lower frequency than that of the
power grid, which is normally 50 or 60 Hz. A lower frequency reduces the effect of
inductance, so the voltage required can be reduced.[76] The LFH drying method is also used
for service of older transformers.[77]
Bushings
Larger transformers are provided with high-voltage insulated bushings made of polymers or
porcelain. A large bushing can be a complex structure since it must provide careful control of
the electric field gradient without letting the transformer leak oil.[78]
Classification parameters
Transformers can be classified in many ways, such as the following:
Circuit application: Such as power supply, impedance matching, output voltage and
current stabilizer or circuit isolation.
Utilization: Pulse, power, distribution, rectifier, arc furnace, amplifier output, etc..
Types
Various specific electrical application designs require a variety of transformer types.
Although they all share the basic characteristic transformer principles, they are customize in
construction or electrical properties for certain installation requirements or circuit conditions.
Autotransformer: Transformer in which part of the winding is common to both
primary and secondary circuits.[83]
Output transformer: Transformer used to match the output of a valve amplifier to its
load.
Applications
An electrical substation in Melbourne, Australia showing 3 of 5 220kV/66kV transformers,
each with a capacity of 150 MVA.[86]
Transformers are used to increase voltage before transmitting electrical energy over long
distances through wires. Wires have resistance which loses energy through joule heating at a
rate corresponding to square of the current. By transforming power to a higher voltage
transformers enable economical transmission of power and distribution. Consequently,
transformers have shaped the electricity supply industry, permitting generation to be located
remotely from points of demand.[87] All but a tiny fraction of the world's electrical power has
passed through a series of transformers by the time it reaches the consumer.[38]
Transformers are also used extensively in electronic products to step-down the supply voltage
to a level suitable for the low voltage circuits they contain. The transformer also electrically
isolates the end user from contact with the supply voltage.
Signal and audio transformers are used to couple stages of amplifiers and to match devices
such as microphones and record players to the input of amplifiers. Audio transformers
allowed telephone circuits to carry on a two-way conversation over a single pair of wires. A
balun transformer converts a signal that is referenced to ground to a signal that has balanced
voltages to ground, such as between external cables and internal circuits.
History
Discovery of induction
Faraday's experiment with induction between coils of wire[88]
Electromagnetic induction, the principle of the operation of the transformer, was discovered
independently and almost simultaneously by Joseph Henry and Michael Faraday in 1831.
Although Henry's work likely having preceded Faraday's work by a few months, Faraday was
the first to publish the results of his experiments and thus receive credit for the discovery.[89]
The relationship between emf and magnetic flux is an equation now known as Faraday's law
of induction:
where is the magnitude of the emf in volts and B is the magnetic flux through the
circuit in webers.[90]
Faraday performed the first experiments on induction between coils of wire, including
winding a pair of coils around an iron ring, thus creating the first toroidal closed-core
transformer.[91] However he only applied individual pulses of current to his transformer, and
never discovered the relation between the turns ratio and emf in the windings.
Induction coils
Faraday's ring transformer
The first type of transformer to see wide use was the induction coil, invented by Rev.
Nicholas Callan of Maynooth College, Ireland in 1836. He was one of the first researchers to
realize the more turns the secondary winding has in relation to the primary winding, the
larger the induced secondary emf will be. Induction coils evolved from scientists' and
inventors' efforts to get higher voltages from batteries. Since batteries produce direct current
(DC) rather than AC, induction coils relied upon vibrating electrical contacts that regularly
interrupted the current in the primary to create the flux changes necessary for induction.
Between the 1830s and the 1870s, efforts to build better induction coils, mostly by trial and
error, slowly revealed the basic principles of transformers.
By the 1870s, efficient generators producing alternating current (AC) were available, and it
was found AC could power an induction coil directly, without an interrupter.
In 1876, Russian engineer Pavel Yablochkov invented a lighting system based on a set of
induction coils where the primary windings were connected to a source of AC. The secondary
windings could be connected to several 'electric candles' (arc lamps) of his own design.[92] [93]
The coils Yablochkov employed functioned essentially as transformers.[92]
In 1878, the Ganz factory, Budapest, Hungary, began manufacturing equipment for electric
lighting and, by 1883, had installed over fifty systems in Austria-Hungary. Their AC systems
used arc and incandescent lamps, generators, and other equipment.[94]
Lucien Gaulard and John Dixon Gibbs first exhibited a device with an open iron core called a
'secondary generator' in London in 1882, then sold the idea to the Westinghouse company in
the United States.[46] They also exhibited the invention in Turin, Italy in 1884, where it was
adopted for an electric lighting system.[95] However, the efficiency of their open-core bipolar
apparatus remained very low.[95]
Induction coils with open magnetic circuits are inefficient at transferring power to loads.
Until about 1880, the paradigm for AC power transmission from a high voltage supply to a
low voltage load was a series circuit. Open-core transformers with a ratio near 1:1 were
connected with their primaries in series to allow use of a high voltage for transmission while
presenting a low voltage to the lamps. The inherent flaw in this method was that turning off a
single lamp (or other electric device) affected the voltage supplied to all others on the same
circuit. Many adjustable transformer designs were introduced to compensate for this
problematic characteristic of the series circuit, including those employing methods of
adjusting the core or bypassing the magnetic flux around part of a coil.[95] Efficient, practical
transformer designs did not appear until the 1880s, but within a decade, the transformer
would be instrumental in the War of Currents, and in seeing AC distribution systems triumph
over their DC counterparts, a position in which they have remained dominant ever since.[96]
Shell form transformer. Sketch used by Uppenborn to describe ZBD engineers' 1885 patents
and earliest articles.[95]
Core form, front; shell form, back. Earliest specimens of ZBD-designed high-efficiency
constant-potential transformers manufactured at the Ganz factory in 1885.
The ZBD team consisted of Kroly Zipernowsky, Ott Blthy and Miksa Dri
Stanley's 1886 design for adjustable gap open-core induction coils[97]
In the autumn of 1884, Kroly Zipernowsky, Ott Blthy and Miksa Dri (ZBD), three
engineers associated with the Ganz factory, had determined that open-core devices were
impracticable, as they were incapable of reliably regulating voltage.[98] In their joint 1885
patent applications for novel transformers (later called ZBD transformers), they described
two designs with closed magnetic circuits where copper windings were either a) wound
around iron wire ring core or b) surrounded by iron wire core.[95] The two designs were the
first application of the two basic transformer constructions in common use to this day, which
can as a class all be termed as either core form or shell form (or alternatively, core type or
shell type), as in a) or b), respectively (see images).[40][41][99][100] The Ganz factory had also in
the autumn of 1884 made delivery of the world's first five high-efficiency AC transformers,
the first of these units having been shipped on September 16, 1884.[101] This first unit had
been manufactured to the following specifications: 1,400 W, 40 Hz, 120:72 V, 11.6:19.4 A,
ratio 1.67:1, one-phase, shell form.[101]
In both designs, the magnetic flux linking the primary and secondary windings traveled
almost entirely within the confines of the iron core, with no intentional path through air (see
Toroidal cores below). The new transformers were 3.4 times more efficient than the open-
core bipolar devices of Gaulard and Gibbs.[102] The ZBD patents included two other major
interrelated innovations: one concerning the use of parallel connected, instead of series
connected, utilization loads, the other concerning the ability to have high turns ratio
transformers such that the supply network voltage could be much higher (initially 1,400 to
2,000 V) than the voltage of utilization loads (100 V initially preferred).[103][104] When
employed in parallel connected electric distribution systems, closed-core transformers finally
made it technically and economically feasible to provide electric power for lighting in homes,
businesses and public spaces.[105][106] Blthy had suggested the use of closed cores,
Zipernowsky had suggested the use of parallel shunt connections, and Dri had performed the
experiments;[107]
Transformers today are designed on the principles discovered by the three engineers. They
also popularized the word 'transformer' to describe a device for altering the emf of an electric
current,[105][108] although the term had already been in use by 1882.[109][110] In 1886, the ZBD
engineers designed, and the Ganz factory supplied electrical equipment for, the world's first
power station that used AC generators to power a parallel connected common electrical
network, the steam-powered Rome-Cerchi power plant.[111]
Although George Westinghouse had bought Gaulard and Gibbs' patents in 1885, the Edison
Electric Light Company held an option on the US rights for the ZBD transformers, requiring
Westinghouse to pursue alternative designs on the same principles. He assigned to William
Stanley the task of developing a device for commercial use in United States.[112] Stanley's first
patented design was for induction coils with single cores of soft iron and adjustable gaps to
regulate the emf present in the secondary winding (see image).[97] This design[113] was first
used commercially in the US in 1886[96] but Westinghouse was intent on improving the
Stanley design to make it (unlike the ZBD type) easy and cheap to produce.[113]
In 1891, Nikola Tesla invented the Tesla coil, an air-cored, dual-tuned resonant transformer
for generating very high voltages at high frequency.[116][117]
See also
Energy portal
Electronics portal
Magnetization
Inductor
Polyphase system
Load profile
Magnetic core
Geomagnetic storm
Paraformer
Rectiformer
Switched-mode power supply
Electronic symbol
Notes
1. Jump up ^ "The turn ratio of a transformer is the ratio of the number of turns
in the high-voltage winding to that in the low-voltage winding",[6] common usage
having evolved over time from 'turn ratio' to 'turns ratio',
9. Jump up ^ For example, the delta-wye transformer, by far the most common
commercial three-phase transformer, is known as the Dyn11 vector group
configuration, Dyn11 denoting D for delta primary winding, y for wye secondary
winding, n for neutral of the wye winding, and 11 for relative phase position on the
clock by which the secondary winding leads the primary winding, namely, 30
leading.
10. Jump up ^ While the above formal definition, derived from standards such as
IEEE C57.12.80, applies to large transformers, it is not uncommon in colloquial, or
even trade, parlance for small general-purpose transformers to be referred to as
'power' transformers, for distribution transformers to be referred to as 'power
distribution' transformers, and so on.
References
1. Jump up ^ Knowlton, A.E. (Ed.) (1949). Standard Handbook for Electrical
Engineers (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill. p. 597, Fig. 642.
4. ^ Jump up to: a b Winders, John J., Jr. (2002). Power Transformer Principles
and Applications. CRC. pp. 2021.
10. ^ Jump up to: a b Jim Breithaupt (2000). "New Understanding: Physics for
Advanced Level (4th Edition)". [Stanley Thornes (Publishers) Ltd]. pp. 300320.
11. Jump up ^ Heathcote, Martin (Nov 3, 1998). J & P Transformer Book (12th
ed.). Newnes. pp. 23. ISBN 0-7506-1158-8.
14. Jump up ^ Kothari, D.P.; Nagrath, I.J. (2010). 3.7 'Transformer Testing' in
Chapter 3 - Transformers (4th ed.). Tata McGraw-Hill. p. 73. ISBN 978-0-07-
069967-0.
15. Jump up ^ Brenner, Egon; Javid, Mansour (1959). "18.1 'Symbols and
Polarity of Mutual Inductance' in Chapter 18 - Circuits with Magnetic Circuits".
Analysis of Electric Circuits. McGraw-Hill. pp. 589590.
18. ^ Jump up to: a b c d Say, M. G. (1984). Alternating Current Machines (5th ed.).
Halsted Press. ISBN 0-470-27451-4.
20. Jump up ^ Edwards, J.; Saha, T. K. (2000). "Power Flow in Transformers Via
the Poynting Vector". AUPEC 2000 Proceedings. Queensland University of
Technology.
32. Jump up ^ Kubo, T.; Sachs, H.; Nadel, S. (2001). Opportunities for New
Appliance and Equipment Efficiency Standards. American Council for an Energy-
Efficient Economy. p. 39. Retrieved June 21, 2009.
33. Jump up ^ Riemersma, H.; Eckels, P.; Barton, M.; Murphy, J.; Litz, D.;
Roach, J. (1981). "Application of Superconducting Technology to Power
Transformers". IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems. PAS-100 (7):
3398. doi:10.1109/TPAS.1981.316682.
38. ^ Jump up to: a b Nailen, Richard (May 2005). "Why We Must Be Concerned
With Transformers". Electrical Apparatus.
40. ^ Jump up to: a b c Del Vecchio, Robert M. et al. (2002). Transformer Design
Principles: With Applications to Core-Form Power Transformers. Boca Raton: CRC
Press. pp. 1011, Fig. 1.8. ISBN 90-5699-703-3.
46. ^ Jump up to: a b Allan, D.J. (Jan. 1991). "Power Transformers The Second
Century". Power Engineering Journal 5 (1): 514. doi:10.1049/pe:19910004.
50. ^ Jump up to: a b Sim, H. Jim; Digby; Scott H. (2004). "2.1 Power
Transformers in Chap. 2 - Equipment Types". In James H. Harlow (ed.); L. L. Grigsby
(Series ed.). The Electric Power Engineering Handbook (Online ed.). CRC Press.
p. 2.1.7 & 2.1.6.2.1. ISBN 0-8493-8578-4.
51. Jump up ^ Boteler, D. H.; Pirjola, R. J.; Nevanlinna, H. (1998). "The Effects
of Geomagnetic Disturbances On Electrical Systems at the Earth's Surface". Advances
in Space Research 22: 1727. doi:10.1016/S0273-1177(97)01096-X.
55. Jump up ^ Dixon, L.H., Jr. (1997). Eddy Current Losses in Transformer
Windings. Texas Instrument. pp. R21toR210.
56. ^ Jump up to: a b c Central Electricity Generating Board (1982). Modern Power
Station Practice. Pergamon Press.
59. ^ Jump up to: a b Tillman, Robert F. (2004). "3.4 Load and Thermal
Performance in Chap. 3 - Ancillary Topics". In James H. Harlow (ed.); L. L. Grigsby
(Series ed.). The Electric Power Engineering Handbook (Online ed.). CRC Press.
p. 3.4.8. ISBN 0-8493-8578-4.
60. Jump up ^ Walling, Reigh; Shattuck; G. Bruce (May 2007). "Distribution
Transformer Thermal Behaviour and Aging in Local-Delivery Distribution Systems".
19th International Conference on Electricity Distribution. Paper 0720. Retrieved 11
February 2013.
67. Jump up ^ Sen, P.K. et al. (2011). "PSERC Pub. 11-02 Transformer
Overloading and Assessment of Loss-of-Life for Liquid-Filled Transformers". Power
Systems Engineering Research Center, Arizona State University. Retrieved 11 January
2013.
68. ^ Jump up to: a b De Keulenaer, H. et al (2001). The Scope for Energy Saving
in the EU Through the Use of Energy-Efficient Electricity Distribution Transformers.
Institution of Engineering and Technology.
72. Jump up ^ AFBI (2011). "9. Contaminants". State of the Seas Report. Agri-
Food and Biosciences Institute & Northern Ireland Environment Agency. p. 71.
ISBN 9977 and 178-1-907053-20-7 Check |isbn= value (help).
76. Jump up ^ Fink, Donald G.; Beatty, H. Wayne (Eds.) (1978). Standard
Handbook for Electrical Engineers (11th ed.). McGraw Hill. pp. 1038 through 10
40. ISBN 0-07-02974-x Check |isbn= value (help).
78. Jump up ^ Ryan, Hugh M. (2001). High Voltage Engineering and Testing.
Institution Electrical Engineers. pp. 416417. ISBN 0-85296-775-6.
79. Jump up ^ Lawhead, Larry; Hamilton, Randy; Horak, John (2006). "Three
Phase Transformer Winding Configurations and Differential Relay Compensation".
Georgia Tech 60th Protective Relay Conference. pp. 810. Retrieved Feb 23, 2012.
80. ^ Jump up to: a b c Beeman, Donald (Ed.) (1955). Industrial Power Systems
Handbook. McGraw-Hill. pp. 349364.
81. Jump up ^ Brown, BIll. "Section 6 Grounding Systems". Schneider. pp. 912.
Retrieved 18 January 2013.
82. ^ Jump up to: a b Beltz, Robert; Peacock, Ian; Vilcheck, William (2000).
"Application Considerations for High Resistance Ground Retrofits in Pulp and Paper
Mills". Pulp and Paper Industry Technical Conference. pp. 3340.
doi:10.1109/PAPCON.2000.854186.
93. Jump up ^ De Fonveille, W. (Jan 22, 1880). "Gas and Electricity in Paris".
Nature 21 (534): 283. Bibcode:1880Natur..21..282D. doi:10.1038/021282b0.
Retrieved Jan 9, 2009.
97. ^ Jump up to: a b Stanley, William, Jr.. "Induction Coil". U.S. Patent 349 311,
issued Sept. 21, 1886. Retrieved July 13, 2009.
99. Jump up ^ Kroly, Simonyi. "The Faraday Law With a Magnetic Ohm's
Law". Termszet Vilga. Retrieved Mar 1, 2012.
100. Jump up ^ Lucas, J.R. "Historical Development of the Transformer". IEE Sri
Lanka Centre. Retrieved Mar 1, 2012.
101. ^ Jump up to: a b Halacsy, A. A.; Von Fuchs, G. H. (April 1961). "Transformer
Invented 75 Years Ago". IEEE Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical
Engineers 80 (3): 121125. doi:10.1109/AIEEPAS.1961.4500994. Retrieved Feb 29,
2012.
105. ^ Jump up to: a b "Blthy, Ott Titusz (18601939)". Hungarian Patent Office.
Retrieved Jan 29, 2004.
106. Jump up ^ Zipernowsky, K.; Dri, M.; Blthy, O.T. "Induction Coil". U.S.
Patent 352 105, issued Nov. 2, 1886. Retrieved July 8, 2009.
107. ^ Jump up to: a b Smil, Vaclav (2005). Creating the Twentieth Century:
Technical Innovations of 18671914 and Their Lasting Impact. Oxford: Oxford
University Press. p. 71. ISBN 9780198037743.
108. Jump up ^ Nagy, rpd Zoltn (Oct. 11, 1996). "Lecture to Mark the 100th
Anniversary of the Discovery of the Electron in 1897 (preliminary text)". Budapest.
Retrieved July 9, 2009.
109. Jump up ^ Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
1989.
111. Jump up ^ "Ott Blthy, Miksa Dri, Kroly Zipernowsky". IEC Techline.
Retrieved Apr 16, 2010.
113. ^ Jump up to: a b Coltman, J.W.; (JanFeb 2002). "The Transformer [Historical
Overview]". Industry Applications Magazine, IEEE 8 (1): 815.
doi:10.1109/2943.974352. Retrieved Feb 29, 2012.
114. Jump up ^ Westinghouse, George, Jr.. "Electrical Converter". U.S. Patent 366
362, issued July 12, 1887.
116. Jump up ^ Uth, Robert (Dec 12, 2000). "Tesla Coil". Tesla: Master of
Lightning. PBS.org. Retrieved May 20, 2008.
117. Jump up ^ Tesla, Nikola. "System of Electrical Lighting". U.S. Patent 454
622, issued June 23, 1891.
Bibliography
Central Electricity Generating Board (1982). Modern Power Station Practice.
Pergamon. ISBN 0-08-016436-6.
Gottlieb, Irving (1998). Practical Transformer Handbook: for Electronics, Radio and
Communications Engineers. Elsevier. ISBN 0-7506-3992-X.
Hammond, John Winthrop (1941). Men and Volts: The Story of General Electric. J.B.
Lippincott Company. pp. see esp. 106107, 178, 238.
Harlow, James (2004). Electric Power Transformer Engineering. CRC Press. ISBN 0-
8493-1704-5.
Heathcote, Martin (1998). J & P Transformer Book (12th ed.). Newnes. ISBN 0-
7506-1158-8.
Hindmarsh, John (1977). Electrical Machines and Their Applications (4th ed.).
Exeter: Pergammon. ISBN 0-08-030573-3.
McLaren, Peter (1984). Elementary Electric Power and Machines. Ellis Horwood.
ISBN 0-470-20057-X.
Pansini, Anthony (1999). Electrical Transformers and Power Equipment. CRC Press.
ISBN 0-88173-311-3.
Ryan, H.M. (2004). High Voltage Engineering and Testing. CRC Press. ISBN 0-
85296-775-6.
Say, M.G. (1983). Alternating Current Machines (5th ed.). London: Pitman. ISBN 0-
273-01969-4.
Winders, Jr., John J. (2002). Power Transformer Principles and Applications. CRC.
ISBN 0-8247-0766-4.
External links
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Transformers.
The Wikibook School Science has a page on the topic of: How to make a transformer
[show]
Electricity delivery
[show]
Electronic components
Categories:
Hungarian inventions
Russian inventions
Transformers (electrical)
Navigation menu
Create account
Log in
Article
Talk
Read
Edit
View history
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikimedia Shop
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
Print/export
Languages
Afrikaans
Aragons
Azrbaycanca
()
Bosanski
Catal
etina
Corsu
Dansk
Deutsch
Eesti
Espaol
Esperanto
Euskara
Franais
Gaeilge
Galego
Hrvatski
Ido
Bahasa Indonesia
Interlingua
slenska
Italiano
Basa Jawa
Kreyl ayisyen
Latina
Latvieu
Lietuvi
Magyar
Bahasa Melayu
Nederlands
Norsk bokml
Norsk nynorsk
Occitan
Ozbekcha
Polski
Portugus
Romn
Scots
Seeltersk
Simple English
Slovenina
Slovenina
/ srpski
Srpskohrvatski /
Basa Sunda
Suomi
Svenska
Tagalog
/tatara
Trke
Trkmene
Ting Vit
Winaray
Wolof
Edit links
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Mobile view