New Aarch Jury Report

JURY REPORT
NEW
AARCH
INTERNATIONAL OPEN DESIGN COMPETITION FOR
THE NEW AARHUS SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE
NEW
AARCH
NEW AARHUS SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE
AARHUS SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE | THE DANISH BUILDING & PROPERTY AGENCY | NEW AARCH JURY REPORT
Page 46
PREFACE
Page 711
OVERVIEW
Page 1215
COMPETITION FACTS
Page 1624
GENERAL REMARKS
Page 2561
WINNERS & PURCHASES
Page 6266
OUTRO
3
PREFACE
Assessment meeting
PREFACE
Aarhus School of Architecture was established in where art, practice and science can go hand in
1965 in existing buildings at 20 Nrreport, in Aar- hand; where the work of students and research-
hus. The location was intended only to be tem- ers is highly visible; and where high-technology
porary and it was expected that, in time, a new and craftsmanship are given equal opportunities
school would be built. More than 50 years later, to develop and may inspire each other. A place
the schools main address is still 20 Nrreport, for which the framework has been established,
and, over the years, its activities have extended without restricting the way it is filled.
into the neighbourhood, with the result that the
school is located at nine different addresses to- Other aims of the competition were to find the
day. Over the years several attempts at realising best possible location for the school at Gods-
the project of building a new school were made. banearealerne, to find out how neighbouring and
None were, however, successful. But in mid-De- surrounding buildings could be programmed,
cember 2016 it finally happened - the open inter- and how a school of architecture that is open to
national design competition NEW AARCH was the outside world might be created.
launched as a collaboration between The Danish
Building & Property Agency and Aarhus School
of Architecture - with support from Realdania. THE TASK IS, FIRST AND FOREMOST, TO
CREATE A PLACE FOR ARCHITECTURAL THINK-
Denmarks first new built school of architecture
will be located on the former railway goods area ING AND ARCHITECTURAL EXPERIMENTS. A
in the heart of Aarhus in connection with a con- LABORATORY TO WHICH WE CAN INVITE THE
verted goods station: since 2012 a centre for art
and cultural production called Godsbanen. The
CITY AND THE WORLD AND WHERE WE CAN
area was, for many years, considered to be a WORK TOGETHER TO PROVIDE VISUAL AND
closed and less attractive part of the city. But in PHYSICAL INSPIRATION FOR THE ARCHITEC-
the future it will, based on Aarhus Municipalitys
plans for the area, develop into a centrally locat- TURE OF TOMORROW.
ed, connecting and significant area of Aarhus.
The vision of a culture-bearing urban district with
a mix of housing, cultural institutions and cultur- There has been an overwhelming interest in the
al activities makes the area an obvious choice for competition; and the jury would like to thank the
locating a new school of architecture and pro- many entrants and acknowledge the great efforts
vides a unique opportunity to influence the way the many entries represent. 235 entries from 47
the area is going to develop. nations were submitted, of which 230 were ac-
cepted for assessment.
The purpose of the open design competition
has been to obtain proposals for how the frame- We have examined very different entries - includ-
work of a robust building within a limited budget ing good, diverse and unexpected proposals. It is
might provide the foundation for an interesting generally the jurys impression that the task has
and innovative environment for training the ar- been difficult - as it ranges widely in scale and
chitects and architectural thinkers of tomorrow: asks fundamental questions about urban con-
a place where the school can bring together its texts, on the one hand, and on the other, about
activities in one location and where traditional programmatic and functional rethinking. Further-
functional contexts have been rethought. A place more it is based on relatively loose architectural
5
programming. Not least for this reason, the many It was decided to purchase twelve entries that
proposals are of great value to us, as they allow provide intelligent solutions to some specific
us to see the complexity of the task from new matters but in other directions do not meet the
angles and ask ourselves new questions in the wishes and requirements of the brief. The jury
process of defining the framework of the school has prioritised buying as many entries as pos-
and developing Godsbanearealerne. sible for the total prize money, as the proposals
along with the three winning entries present a
wide range of possible solutions which will serve
as a basis and provide inspiration for the subse-
THE DESIGN OF THE SCHOOL MUST ALLOW quent process of defining with greater precision
the framework and content of the new school.
SPACE FOR BUILDING AND PRODUCTION OF
PROTOTYPES. IT MUST BE ABLE TO OPERATE The following is a review of the jurys general re-
24 HOURS A DAY, AND STUDENTS MUST marks on the competition, followed by a review
of the three winning entries and the purchased
TAKE CENTRE STAGE. WE WANT LARGE HIGH- entries - all of which supported by the entrants
CEILINGED SPACES A BUILDING THAT CAN illustrations.
LIVE UP TO THE SCHOOLS VISION ENGAGING
THROUGH ARCHITECTURE. THIS DEMANDS Signed by the jury on 18 March 2016 in Copenhagen.
A RAW AND ROBUST STRUCTURE THAT IS

ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE CHANGE.
The 230 entries we received helped the jury clar-

ify the questions raised in the brief and have
engaged the jury in many exciting discussions
about function, architecture and urban spaces, as
well as about what a school of architecture actu-
ally is. The field of winners remained open for a
long time and only in the final stage of the assess-
ment it became clear who the winners would be.
In full and complete agreement, the jury was able
to identify three winners: entries #101/37641897,
#156/64130476 and #220/92070479, on the
grounds that these proposals were able to solve
the task at a highly professional level.
6
OVERVIEW
Assessment meeting
WORLD MAP
Australia / 4 Hong Kong / 4 Saudi Arabia / 1

Austria / 1 India / 4 Slovenia / 1
Bangladesh / 1 Indonesia / 1 South Korea / 1
Belgium / 3 Ireland / 1 Spain / 25
Bulgaria / 1 Israel / 4 Sweden / 2
Canada / 4 Italy / 11 Switzerland / 1
Chile / 1 Japan / 4 The Netherlands / 3
China / 8 Lebanon / 3 Tunesia / 1
Columbia / 2 Mexico / 1 Turkey / 2
Croatia / 1 Norway / 9 Ukraine / 2
Denmark / 50 Palestine / 2 United Kingdom / 15
El Salvador / 1 Peru / 1 Uruguay / 2
Finland / 5 Poland / 4 USA / 15
France / 7 Portugal / 6 Venezuela / 1
Germany / 2 Romania / 1 Vietnam / 1
Greece / 6 Russia / 4
8
9
THREE EQUAL FIRST PRIZES PURCHASES

DKK 200,000 EACH DKK 25,000 EACH
#101/37641897 #156/64130476 #220/92070479

ERIK GIUDICE ARCHITECTS VARGO, NIELSEN & PALLE ATELIER LORENTZEN LANGKILDE
#011/03641494 #014/04344322 #037/12282623

ADEPT BOGLE ARCHITECTS JWH + VESTHARDT ARKITEKTER
10
#051/19127100 #060/22740814 #067/24707263

OP EFFEKT + K. LINDHART WEISS PABLO PITA ARCHITECTS
#129/50293570 #153/62661105 #159/65481966

PADILLA NICAS ARQUITECTOS ATELIER CMJN TALLER 301
#187/75651600 #189/75792043 #229/96685212

AART ARCHITECTS MATTERS JAJA ARCHITECTS
11
COMPETITION
FACTS
Assessment meeting
COMPETITION FACTS
COMPETITION INITIATOR AND COMPETITION FORM setting of a school of architecture, another part
The initiator of this competition is The Danish of the task was to locate the school in the area
Building & Property Agency who in cooperation and make suggestions for programming future
with Aarhus School of Architecture has launched neighbouring buildings. All of this in the hope of
the competition as an open design competition creating a well-considered master plan for the
in accordance with EU Directive no. 2004/18/EC area in cooperation with Aarhus Municipality.
(The Public Procurement Directive). The compe-
tition was announced in Prior Information Notice COMPETITION PERIOD
2015/S 172-313735, on 1 September 2015. 15 December 2015 1 February 2016
The open design competition is funded by Aar- ENTRIES

hus School of Architecture and Realdania and Total Number of submitted entries: 235
implemented with assistance from the Danish Entries accepted for assessment: 230
Architects Association. Aarhus Municipality has Danish/international entries: 50/180
made the competition area available and contrib-
uted with information about the known plans for JURY
Godsbanearealerne. The Danish Building & Property Agency: Kristian
Lyk-Jensen, Vice Director (Chairman of the jury)
THE COMPETITION BRIEF WAS PREPARED BY and Signe Primdal Kregaard, appointed tempo-
The Danish Building & Property Agency and Aar- rarily as Project Director.
hus School of Architecture. Aarhus School of Architecture: Ingelise Bogason,
Chairman of the Board and Torben Nielsen, Rector.
THE ASSIGNMENT Realdania: Lars Autrup, Project Director.
After 50 years at its current location, new school
buildings are to be built for Aarhus School of Ar- DESIGN PROFESSIONALS APPOINTED BY THE DANISH
chitecture. As a starting point, the school should ARCHITECTS ASSOCIATION
have an area of 13,000 m2, but should also be Jens Thomas Arnfred, Architect MAA, and Reiulf
sufficiently robust to allow future adjustments in Ramstad, Architect MNAL (Norway).
size and scale. The total budget of the building
project is DKK 250 million, excluding VAT, to cov- ADVISERS TO THE JURY
er construction costs, consultancy services, land Aarhus Municipality: Erik Jespersen, Director
purchase, etc. of Technical and Environmental Services and
Stephen Willacy, City Architect.
The school is to be located in the new urban de- The Danish Building & Property Agency: Lisa
velopment area Godsbanearealerne, in the heart Srensen, project manager (secretary to the
of Aarhus. For the open design completion Aar- jury), Rikke Wedege Srensen, associate project
hus Municipality has made a competition area manager, Dorte Demant Westphall, lawyer, and
available, that is somewhat larger than the area Mikkel Borre, lawyer.
The Danish Building & Property Agency will Aarhus School of Architecture: Jrgen Hede-
eventually purchase for the school. gaard-Jensen, director of administration (not
present), Walter Unterrainer, professor, Kim
Besides proposing a design statement and pro- Christiansen, tenants advisor, and Lone Biehl,
viding instructions for rethinking the physical tenants advisor (not present).
13
SECRETARY TO THE JURY AND PROJECT COORDINATOR #099/36977494; #101/37641897; #105/39257234;

Lisa Srensen, project manager, The Danish #109/40561383; #121/45434450; #129/50293570;
Building & Property Agency #136/53774797; #153/62661105; #156/64130476;
#159/65481966; #164/67237029; #165/67321550;
COMPETITION SECRETARY #170/68414091; #175/70366036; #178/72328279;
Bent Kolind, architect MAA, Danish Architects #187/75651600; #188/75757760; #189/75792043;
Association #195/79791362; #197/81278217; #206/84645792;
#210/87428972; #218/90809830; #219/91280800;
ASSESSMENT PERIOD #220/92070479; #225/94171945; #229/96685212
22 February - 9 March 2016 and #230/96956875.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA At the first meeting the design professionals pre-

The entries were assessed based on the assess- sented the chosen entries. The jury then decided
ment criteria IDEA, ARCHITECTURE, FUNCTION that the following 28 entries were to proceed to
(weighted 65%) and RELATIONSHIP TO THE SITE the second meeting:
(weighted 35%). More detailed information on
this on page 61 of the competition brief. #011/03641494; #013/03956307; #014/04344322;
#028/09045791; #037/12282623; #051/19127100;
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE #056/21124374; #059/21299093; #060/22740814;
All entries were assigned a serial number which #062/23294307; #067/24707263; #073/28727413;
supplemented the unique submission code to #076/29248267; #094/35069416; #099/36977494;
make the assessment process easier by using #101/37641897; #109/40561383; #129/50293570;
simple references. In the present jury report the #153/62661105; #156/64130476; #159/65481966;
entries are referred to using both the serial num- #164/67237029; #187/75651600; #188/75757760;
ber and the submission code, as follows: #nnn/ #189/75792043; #219/91280800; #229/96685212
xxxxxxxx. E.g. #001/12345678. and #230/96956875.
During the assessment process, the jury held a At the second meeting, the 28 entries from the
total of four meetings. During initial, preliminary first meeting were discussed. The meeting was
meetings, all 230 entries were reviewed by the concluded by choosing the following 6 entries for
design professionals. The design professionals the third meeting:
subsequently agreed to present to the other ju-
rors the following 61 entries: #014/04344322; #101/37641897; #153/62661105;
#156/64130476; #159/65481966; #189/75792043
#001/00801072; #004/02175765; #008/02835578;
#010/03353539; #011/03641494; #013/03956307; At the third meeting, the 6 entries were exam-
#014/04344322; #018/05405693; #023/07799036; ined and entry #220/92070479 was furthermore
#024/07824336; #026/08401554; #027/08698445; once again included in the assessment process.
#028/09045791; #032/10157333; #035/11676579; It was then decided which entries were to be
#037/12282623; #038/12812859; #045/15554652; designated as winners, which entries were to be
#047/16354901; #051/19127100; #056/21124374; purchased, and how the prize money would be
#057/21135229; #058/21147837; #059/21299093; distributed.
#060/22740814; #062/23294307; #064/24096793;
#067/24707263; #073/28727413; #076/29248267; At the fourth meeting, the jurys report was signed
#094/35069416; #095/35890638; #098/36821108; and the name envelopes opened.
14
THE RESULT TOTAL PRIZE MONEY

Three equal winners: DKK 900,000
Entry #101/37641897: DKK 200,000
Entry #156/64130476: DKK 200,000 ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE COMPETITION RESULT
Entry #220/92070479: DKK 200,000 4 April 2016
Purchases:
Entry #011/03641494: DKK 25,000
Entry #014/04344322: DKK 25,000
Entry #037/12282623: DKK 25,000
Entry #051/19127100: DKK 25,000
Entry #060/22740814: DKK 25,000
Entry #067/24707263: DKK 25,000
Entry #129/50293570: DKK 25,000
Entry #153/62661105: DKK 25,000
Entry #159/65481966: DKK 25,000
Entry #187/75651600: DKK 25,000
Entry #189/75792043: DKK 25,000
Entry #229/96685212: DKK 25,000
Entry #038/12812859 made by Aleksandar Shinolov, Site plan 1:4000
15
GENERAL
REMARKS
Assessment meeting
GENERAL REMARKS
The open design competition NEW AARCH is no exemplary manner, but also show how difficult
ordinary competition, no ordinary place and no it is to summarize entirely convincing design
ordinary task. On the one hand, the aim of the statements. Virtually all of the entrants found it a
competition is to invite the authors of the three challenge to maintain a low level of detail while
best entries to participate in the next and crucial focusing on concept, future programming ideas
round. On the other hand, the aim of the type of and rethinking functional contexts. It is evident
competition that was chosen is to shed light on that the entrants have juggled scales, volumes,
several possible solutions models for the school axes, and functional strategies, but it is also ap-
of architectures location, layout and nature. parent that it has not been easy to find a superior
contextual statement in a rather open game with
In the assessment of the 230 entries we have many unknowns.
tried to answer the questions formulated in the
brief under the headings: IDEA, ARCHITECTURE, The entries we have received have chosen very
FUNCTION and RELATIONSHIP TO THE SITE. different emphases. Some have used all their
efforts on the school itself, neglecting the devel-
The entries have not only been assessed on the opment and landscape contexts. Others have
basis of their ability to provide answers to the optimised and fine-tuned the green wedge and
individual parameters of the task, but also based the wide, level landscape features, while trying
on the quality of the overall solution. During the to fit in a school of architecture wherever any
assessment process, the many open questions room was left. Only few entries have managed
in the brief combined with the solutions have to put all the pieces on the board and let them
resulted in important discussions on the follow- float freely until the game found its own level
ing subjects: and a characteristic and beautifully proportioned
building project emerged from the board to catch
The location of the building or building com- the attention of the jury.
plex at the site
The ability of the proposal to exploit the sites THE LOCATION ON GODSBANEAREALERNE
urban and landscape potential We have Danish State Railways to thank for
The ability to create a basis for further devel- Godsbanearealerne being the area it is: a wel-
opment of Godsbanearealerne come, green lung characterised by low-rise
The ability of the proposals to manage a future buildings in the heart of the city. The compe-
flexible architectural programme tition initiator has taken the liberty of turning
The ability of the proposal to identify possi- the unresolved planning issues at Godsbanear-
ble alternatives to the traditional educational/ ealerne into an advantage: we hope and expect
learning environment in recognition of the the new school of architecture, in all of its ap-
fact that, in terms of organisation, Aarhus pearance, will set the agenda for developing the
School of Architecture resembles an artistic area further. It has, consequently, been extreme-
institution, with studios, workshops and ad- ly important to the jury to identify proposals that
vanced robotic technology, more than a tra- bring into play the contextual gaming pieces in
ditional university environment with lecture a convincing manner.
halls and classrooms
But how should the school be located? What is
Seen as a whole, the many entries we received to be the schools function in the urban spaces
shed light on the tasks complex dilemmasin an involved? How should it be located in relation
17
THE OUTDOOR AREAS CONSTITUTE A VALUABLE POTENTIAL.

GATES AND WALLS MUST PROVIDE A FREE FLOW BETWEEN PROJECTS
INDOORS AND OUTDOORS. THE LIFE OF THE SCHOOL SHOULD BE
NURTURED BY GREEN SPACES
to the landscape features of dalen, to the rail- In general, the jury was looking for solutions that
way track areas, pedestrian streets, to new and celebrate the sites special potentials as a distinc-
old buildings? What is the cultural axis? And how tive urban space that enhances the way Godsba-
should the new school of architecture leave its nen is experienced as the terminus of the green
mark on the cityscape? The questions are many, wedge, as seen in entry #010/03353539 (p. 24).
but there are even more answers.
THE EAST-WEST AXIS
THE GREEN WEDGE Finally, it was an important element of the assess-
One of the few requirements of the brief was ment to assess the entries ability to maintain
that the green wedge had to be maintained as and strengthen the east-west connection: an axis
an unbroken landscape, connecting dalen with which will in the future become a major artery
the city, all the way to Godsbanen. Basically, for connecting the city and creating flow in the
the entries present two approaches to the green area. Many entrants have seen this opportunity,
wedge. An approach in which the building/ but only few emphasise and support it as clearly
building complex is located on the side (east as entries #014/04344322 (p. 40), #051/19127100
or west) of the green wedge and one in which it (p. 44) and #101/37641897 (p. 26).
is located within the green wedge, either seal-
ing off the wedge or letting it run under/over/ A CAMPUS OR A SINGLE BUILDING
through the building/building complex as in, On the subject of Aarhus School of Architectures
for instance, entries #038/12812859 (p. 15) and location at Godsbanearealerne, the jury discussed
#178/72328279 (p.19). whether a scattered or a compact building com-
plex would be most advantageous and whether
Regardless of the strategy chosen for situating a single building or a campus concept would be
the building, the Jurys assessment has empha- most suitable. Several solutions work with the
sised a deliberate and articulate architectural school of architecture as relatively small, frag-
relationship between the school and landscape mented volumes in an attempt to fit the project
which would allow the schools workshop facili- into the scale determined by the site. An example
ties to move outdoors, when the season permits of this can be seen in entry #073/28727413 (p. 24).
it, as in entry #188/75757760 (p.19).
With reference to the many scattered leases that
THE RELATION TO GODSBANEN characterize the school today, the jury has pre-
The connection to Godsbanen and the square in ferred proposals that bring together the schools
front of the centres entrance is another aspect teaching and organisational activities in one
the jury chose to emphasise. Also in this respect building. For this reason, it is only very few of
the solutions fall in two different categories in the awarded entries that propose a school which
terms of location, which more or less establish is not under one roof (#011/03641494 (p. 38) and,
the projects interaction with Godsbanen. approximately, #060/22740814 (p. 46)).
18
SAME LINEAR CONDITION. INTERCONNECTED COMMON DIRECTIONAL BANDS DIPTYCH COMPOSITION COLLABORATORY FIELD
GROUND BETWEEN THE TWO
THE MASTERPLAN CONSISTS SCHOOL BUILDINGS. A COGNITIVE ADAPTATION THE DIPTYCH COMPOSITION THE GROUND FLOOR IS A
OF LINEAR BANDS RUNNING THE BANDS OFFERS A OF A LINEARITY FROM OF THE STRUCTURES CREATES CONTINUATION OF THE URBAN
DIRECTIONALLY FROM DISTRIBUTIONAL STRATEGY, STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS OF THE A FIELD OF INTERACTION IN FIELD, WITH HIGHLY PUBLIC
THE URBAN NODE AND YET STILL OFFERS A HIGH POSTINDUSTRIAL SITE. BETWEEN, IN WHICH URBANITIES FUNCTIONS THAT BECOMES A
THROUGHOUT THE SITE. THE AARHUS
LEVEL OF POROSITY ACROSS SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE | THE DANISH BUILDINGARE
& PROPERTY
MIXED. FLOWSAGENCY
FROM THE| NEW AARCH COLLABORATORY
JURY REPORT FIELD BETWEE
BANDS IS A VARIETY OF URBAN THE BANDS THAT ALLOWS FOR CITY OVERLAPS THE PATHS THE FUNCTIONS WITHIN THE
DEVELOPMENTS, AND NEW A CONNECTION BETWEEN THE OF STUDENTS AND TEACHER SCHOOL AND THE PUBLIC.
SLOW TRAFFIC ROADS THAT URBAN CONTEXT AND THE ACTIVITY, IN A CONTINUOUS
ALLOWS FOR SOCIAL ACTIVITIES. RECREATIONAL AREAS. URBAN FIELD.
TWO CULTURAL BANDS IN
RIOR PERSPECTIVE
mock-ups becomes the architecture Creating various spatial qualities in, on and around the large volumes Skylights ensures lot of daylight into the building
240 m2
1040 m2
860 m2
400 m2
170 m2
PARKING
630 m2
970 m2
1240 m2
TAP
jects will be exposed to the outside world Possible expansion with additional floor plans The volumes can flexibly change location Shading plantation, sun shading, large curtains
Entry #178/72328279 made by Bjrn Alstrup Oddgaard, Site plan 1:4000
Parking for cars
Entry #188/75757760 made by Kristian Brandsen, Plan 1:1000

Parking for trucks
Common space
SITEPLAN 1:2000
Civic kitchen
220 m 2
Exhibition area
800 m 2
Project/ Canteen
meeting space 670 m2
50 m2
Work spaces for

administrative/technical staff Archi Tegn
(40 employees) 200 m 2
800 m 2
Multi room
80 m2
Storeroom/ Storeroom/
technical facilities technical facilities
Entrepreneurship centre
Project/ 130 m 2
meeting spaces
50 m2
Printing office/
graphic production
M-LAB 130 m 2
120 m 2
Daylight and
acoustic labs
120 m 2
Common space
Special machines
175 m 2
Auditorium Auditorium
Parking for bicycles
350 m 2 190 m 2
Multi room
Project/ Storage of models 45 m2
meeting spaces 60 m2
130 m 2 ENVELOPE
THREE-YEAR BA PROGRAMME
Library Special workshops/labs Teaching at drafting tables/in workshops
500 m 2 540 m 2 (335 students)
2300 m 2
Parking for bicycles
Internship centre
THREE-YEAR BA PROGRAMME
120 m 2 External relations
Teaching at drafting tables/in workshops
120 m 2
(335 students)
2300 m 2
PROBS 0 FLOOR FLOW

Common space
Exhibition/Information hallway
Outdoor areas for teaching Exhibition area
Container
LEVELS
Workshops/Storage
250 m 2 Storage
0 FLOOR ORGANISATION
Container relaxing area
Container greenhouse Container bar

FRAME
Container
19
Container LAB
Container storage
Entry #109/40561383 Entry #008/02835578 Entry #035/11676579

Made by MONGE + SALCEDO ARCHITECTS Made by WILLIAM MATTHEWS ASSOCIATES Made by Boyarsky Murphy Architects

Made by Petrs Architecture Made by Fadil Foondun, Junkwang Kim Made by NOBEL arkitekter
& Camille Mesnard

Made by LOT-EK. Made by NIKKEN SEKKEI Made by Md. Monir Hasan
20
Despite the desire for placing all activities under iconic: like entry: #051/19127100 (p. 44) The
one roof, there is, however, also a need to vary village: like entry #095/35890638 (p. 20) The
the characters and natures of spaces so they in- stacked: like entry #028/09045791 (p. 20) The
vite different uses and provide a sense of belong- cloud: like entry #210/87428972 (p. 20) The top-
ing - values that characterise the existing school ographic: like entry #195/79791362 (p. 20) and,
with its scattered location and which the school naturally, a great many intermediate forms.
would like to incorporate in the new school. An
entry which presents a very fine solution to this Many solutions reveal a thorough knowledge of
is #229/96685212 (p. 60). teaching activities at the present school and have
made good efforts to summarise a building pro-
The schools need and desire to be open to the ject that is able to meet the desire of the brief for
outside world and invite in the city and its citi- creating a framework for free so-called dynamic
zens has characterized many solutions. In the teaching courses in high-ceilinged, multifunc-
course of the assessment process the jury has tional workshop-like spaces. Some examples
been strengthened in its belief in one single of this; a three-storey room with a ceiling crane
building that is, nevertheless, without appearing for construction work (#101/37641897 (p. 26)),
introverted, open to the outside world. Howev- tool towers and workshop pavilions in the open
er, not all activities at a school of architecture (#156/64130476 (p. 30)), internal function-specific
are suited to being exhibited, and as always it buildings around which less programmed func-
is necessary to strike a fine balance between the tions unfold (#153/62661105 (p.52)), studio terrac-
complexs potential to provide peace to work and es (#220/92070479 (p. 34)) and visible workshop
openness. For his reason several proposals sug- facilities as overall expression (#156/64130476 (p.
gest a building within the building and point out p. 30) and #159/65481966 (p. 54)).
the fact that the schools workshop and exhibi-
tion spaces belong in the category of urban and PROGRAMMING AND CONTENT
audience-oriented activities. However, the high- Quite deliberately, the brief for this ideas compe-
ceilinged factory model requires interventions tition was formulated very openly.
that can support the need of the learning envi-
ronment for concentration; and in several solu- The entries include many competent solutions,
tions this model is accompanied by furniture and but the jury also finds that it has been difficult for
equipment solutions that ensure the necessary many of the authors to challenge routine think-
intimacy and clarity of layout. The jury is, howev- ing and relate freely, conceptually and radically
er, not convinced that any entries meet this inten- to the issue of re-programming the function of a
tion to a sufficient extent. school of architecture and accept that the com-
petition was an ideas competition in which all
BUILDING TYPOLOGICAL VARIATIONS aspects of the solution need not necessarily add
It is not surprising that the solutions present a up. In this respect we have not quite achieved
wide range of building typological variations. our objective in the open design competition,
We might mention the following as headlines: and we will therefore work more on this in the
The square complex: like entry #109/40561383 next phase.
(p. 20) The elongated complex: like entry
#008/02835578 (p. 20) The bridge: like entry SCALABILITY
#035/11676579 (p. 20) The circular: like entry Aarhus School of Architectures functional and
#098/36821108 (p. 20) The composite: like entry spatial needs are still being planned; and we
#073/28727413 (p. 24) The campus: like entry need to find solutions that do not restrict the on-
#121/45434450 (p. 23) The hangar: like entry going adjustments that are constantly made to
#188/75757760 (p. 19) The wing/barn: like en- optimise the schools needs. We very much need
try #219/91280800 (p. 20) The monumental and a school that can be scaled up as well as down.
21
General usability and robustness have conse- Other entrants have had a special focus on op-
quently been key words in our assessment. For erating costs, proposing huge, translucent dou-
the same reason, the jury has been particularly ble building envelopes in an attempt to intro-
attracted to solutions that not only demonstrate duce seasonally-determined climate zones that
the ability to prioritize and organize, but which point to the fact that not all activities in a work-
also show the ability to cut to the bone using shop-oriented school of architecture require the
simple strategic interventions and provide spac- same temperatures. This is the case in entries
es for the schools many-faceted uses that are #153/62661105 (p. 52) and #101/37641897 (p. 26).
open to interpretation. In a way, its all about con-
centrating on the essentials and pointing out the The assessment of the feasibility of proposals
most necessary uses. The jury has consequently has been supported by the fact that the winning
deemed less attractive solutions which, in order entries are not going to be built tomorrow. For
to accommodate form, took liberties that tied the same reason, we have been looking for pro-
freedom to form and not vice versa. posals with the potential for development and a
concept that allows us to hope they will assert
themselves further when translated to the final
project. It has been the jurys conviction that only
WE NEED PROPOSALS FOR A VERY the most magnificent, scalable interventions can
withstand the attacks all projects come under
ROBUST DESIGN FOR A NEW SCHOOL OF
when estimates have to be made and projects
ARCHITECTURE. WE ENVISION A BUILDING are to be realized in the tough and thoroughly
IN WHICH WE CAN INTEGRATE NEW regulated world of the construction industry.
SPATIAL FEATURES CONCLUSION

In choosing the three winners and the twelve
purchased entries the jury hopes and believes to
The open design competition has made the have taken an important step towards realizing a
jury aware of how focusing on using the area new school of architecture in Aarhus.
efficiently and on scalability will be imperative
in the next stage. In terms of both uses and The three winning entries represent concepts,
square meters. visions and ideas that all emphasise visibility,
dialogue with the surroundings, access to out-
ECONOMIC FRAMEWORK AND FEASIBILITY door areas and large spaces for experiments and
Most entrants have seen the task as an exercise making prototypes. They are robust in their ba-
in using the areas as efficiently as possible and sic form and use of materials and strong enough
providing the greatest number of usable square to be changed over time - without losing their
and cubic metres using a minimum of resources. power. They are general to an extent that enables
To their credit, many of the solutions have cher- ongoing completion, without being indifferent in
ished the nature of architecture as something their point of departure. Last but not least, they
precious and have made significant efforts to focus on creating the best possible physical en-
reconcile the requirements of the brief with the vironment for training architects with a Scandi-
modest construction budget. Only a few entries navian tone and international format. A place
have submitted economic calculations along where you can engage in a visible dialogue with
with their solutions, but quite a number have the outside world about what architecture is ac-
endeavoured to find simple structural principles tually about.
and clarified building volumes that bear testimo-
ny to an understanding of the reasons on which The jury has taken note of architectural state-
the building project is based. ments that demonstrated the ability to read the
22
PECTIVE INTERIOR PERSPECT
6) New Mixed Use, Shopping and Residential, Plot 13) New Mixed Use, Shopping and Office
2202b Ground-1 floor, 3.800m2
Ground floor, 2.500m2 2-5 floor, 2.700m2
1-5 floor, 2.500m2 Total, 9.000m2
2
Total, 5.000m2
14) New Mixed Use, Shopping and Residential
BANEGRDEN
7) New Mixed Use, Shopping and Residential, Plot Ground-2 floor, 6.000m2 THE CULTURAL AXIS
2202b 3-5 floor, 3.100m2
Cultural Axis Total, 9.100m2
Ground floor, 2.500m2
1-5 floor, 2.500m2
a, 23.000m2 15) New Parking House
Total, 5.000m2
max. 25m, 6 floors. Ground - 4 floor, Total 8.800m2
rea of 10.500m2)
8) New Mixed Use, Shopping and Office, Plot 845q
Ground floor, 1000m2
Building
1-5 floor, 5.000m2
200m2 NEWAARCH
Total, 6.000m2
m2 16
9) New Parking House, Plot 845q
Ground - 4 floor, Total 8.800m2
Building
000m2 The Green
m2 Wedge
2 10 THE GREEN WEDGE
or area, 22.900m2 Subarea 4 The Event Area
3
11 Area, 45.000m2
RAMS 4 Gross floor area, max 23-45.000m2
The Green Building height max. 25m, 6 floors.
5
Wedge
3 16) New Multi Purpose Arena
Ground floor, 11.300m2 Entry #121/45434450 made by MAS, Site plan
4 Subarea 3 The Dense Neighbourhood
1-3 floor, 11.700m2 VIEW FROM NORTH
Area, 30.000m2
The Green Gross floor area, max 45-60.000m2 Total, 23.000m2
Wedge Building height max. 25m, 6 floors.
(Incl. Parking House, 35x50m gross floor area
Creative Urban Distict of 9.000m2)
a, max 39-43.000m2 10) New Mixed Use, Shopping and Residential

ding plot max. 12.000m2, building Ground-1 floor, 5.800m2
0.000m2, max. gross floor area of 2-5 floor, 5.300m2
Total, 11.100m2
max. 25m, 6 floors.
max. 20.000m2, incl. NEWAARCH 11) New Mixed Use, Shopping and Office
a of max. 10.000m2) Ground floor, 900m2
max. 19-23.000m2, incl. Parking 1-4 floor, 4.000m2
gross floor area of 9.000m2 and incl Total, 4.900m2
s floor area of max. 3-7.000m2)
12) New Mixed Use, Shopping and Office
The New School of Architecture, Ground-2 floor, 4.500m2
202b 3-5 floor, 5.200m2
000m2 (incl. 1.500m2 atrium) Total, 9.000m2
m2
The New School of Architecture,

45q
500m2 (incl. 100m2 existing
C STUDENTS cLASSROOmS
USE 1: three year Ba Programme- 335

uilding) students
M2: 800 m2
%: 19.1%
USE 2: M Lab
New School og Architecture, Phase M2: 60 m2
rea 13.100m2. %: 1,5%
USE 3: project/ meeting spaces
B
The New School of Architecture, M2: 100 m2
%: 2,3%
45q
3.800m2 USE 4: entrepreneurship centre for
recent graduates/ "incubator
environment" for aprox 20 people
New School of Architecture, Phase 1 M2: 256 m2
area 16.900m2. %: 6,4%
USE 5: special workshops labs

M2: 100 m2
%: 2,9% New Road
EXiSTiNG BULDiNG 1
mAiN ENTRANcE USE 6: daylight and acoustic labs
M2: 100 m2
USE: main entrance + cinema
%: 2,3%
M2: 797 m2
%:-
Entry #010/03353539 made by Ask Hvas, Site plan 1:4000
USE 7: archi tegn/ possibly other shops
M2: 100 m2
B
%: 2,3%
23 1.
USE 8: storeroom/technical facilities/
C
secondary room/ gross areas
M2: 163 m2
A %: 4%
Exitsting Railway Tracks

the school. Finally, the parking is located on the western side of the site to avoid the projection of shadows to the dwellings. students can make their models and mockups. share their crops with the sc
NEW AARCH FOOTPRINT = 7045 m2

NEW AARCHSCHOOL
AARHUS PLOT = 11910
OFm ARCHITECTURE | THE DANISH BUILDING & PROPERTY AGENCY
2
| NEW AARCH JURY REPORT
potentials of Godsbanearealerne the green

wedge, the urban space at Godsbanen, the east-
west axis - and which have been able to success-
fully juggle the challenges of the brief and come
up with a proposal that may support the compe-
tition initiators aim: that the new school of archi-
tecture in Aarhus should be a very special place
in the city.
SITEPLAN 1:2000
Printing office
M-LAB
Special
workshops / labs
ReUse
GROUNDFLOOR 1:500
Overhead
Center crane
SCHOOL
Student association FUTURE
Academic staff OFFICE
EXTENSION
Administrative staff
to
GODSBANEN
WORKSHOPS
ARCHI-TEGN
Overnight
accommodation
CIVIC Mock-up
KITCHEN facade
structure
INSTITUT
FOR (X) Seminar
LIBRARY
& Meeting
&
EXHIBITION SECTION/FACADE 1:500
WORKSHOPS
Teaching architecture
Internship center GREEN
WEDGE
External relations
International exchange
Bike parking
Architects
start-up Artist in
residence
Entry #073/28727413 made by DV2C2,

FLOW/ORGANISATION
Conceptual Drawing SECTION/FACADE 1:500
24
WINNERS &
PURCHASES
Assessment meeting
ONE OF THREE EQUAL FIRST PRIZES OF DKK 200,000

OPEN CAMPUS #101/37641897
ERIK GIUDICE ARCHITECTS

FRANCE/SWEDEN
The design proposal presents a clear and con- IDEA, ARCHITECTURE, FUNCTION
vincing location in a public context. The concep- The architectural solution follows a clear structur-
tual approach embodies the idea of the future al principle that leaves an elegant and distinctive
school as a tool box - an open structure - which impression. Site logistics are rooted in industri-
is general in many ways and allows for change. al rationality with a regular, structurally flexible
grid of clear zones. The concept is enhanced by
RELATION TO THE SITE differentiated climate zones in the building and
Aarhus School of Architecture is proposed ar- large south-facing sliding doors that support and
ranged in an east-west direction, perpendicular facilitate the connection between indoor and out-
to and immediately south of Godsbanen. This door areas.
would support the overall intention of strength-
ening the urban districts east-west connection. The quality of the layout is based in the order-
This intervention helps create a clear relation ly and systematic structuring of uses on four
to Godsbanen, located to the north. The space levels within a regular building volume. On the
between these two buildings creates a clearly ground-floor level, the green wedge penetrates
defined square which might help invigorate a the building as an unheated space. At Carl Blochs
central urban meeting place in the area. The in- Gade, where the main entrance is located, life in
tervention was an unexpected surprise to the the streets can also be drawn into the building
jury and belongs among the best entries in the by means of sliding doors. The city, in a manner
competition. In accordance with the planning of speaking, flows through the building, allowing
framework of the project, the proposal, however, for interaction between the school of architecture
requires the school to be arranged within this and the public - a good feature which provides
location without exceeding 10,000 m2. several opportunities in relation to teaching.
To the south of the school of architecture is in- Study spaces are arranged as a bridge above the
dicated a simple site plan with well-arranged green wedge, unifying the body of the building,
building volumes. The understanding of the site which is divided in two in the three levels below.
is enhanced by the fact that the green wedge This solution - a building which is in many ways
runs through the new building, leading to the separated into different units - would pose a chal-
central square. Thus anchoring the two general lenge in relation to the internal organisation of
landscape features in one unit. The site plan is the school. The proposal contains an inherent
well-arranged and robust. The area is clearly de- duality that may make form and programming
fined and structured to create a fine framework objectives appear inconsistent in relation to one
for the further development of the area. The solu- another. Dividing the building causes a loss of
tion creates a good flow in the area, invites peo- compactness and flexibility and may seem coun-
ple to move around a great deal and provides ex- terproductive to the schools many uses. Me-
cellent opportunities for diverse outdoor spaces thodically separating uses from one another in
and environments. separate horizontal layers while simultaneously
26
Exterior perspective made by Erik Giudice Architects
27
Site plan 1:4000 made by Erik Giudice Architects
Conceptual diagram made by Erik Giudice Architects
28
cutting through the building impedes the desired SUMMARY: IN THE CONTEXT THE
close symbiosis between the schools many ac-
PROPOSAL FUNCTIONS IN A WAY THAT IS
tivities. One can see some degree of industrial
rigidity in the way spaces and structures are BOTH EFFORTLESS AND CLEAR, PROVIDING
manifested, which appears contradictory in a STRUCTURE TO THE URBAN LANDSCAPE IN
school of architecture - a place characterised by a
high degree of interaction between research and
A REFINED WAY. THE BUILDING ITSELF HAS
teaching. The bridge has contributed positively A DISTINCT ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER
to the jurys discussions by challenging the re- WITH EVIDENT QUALITIES.
quirements of the brief for the greatest number
of multiple uses - everywhere. We have, in any
case, chosen to believe that this schism can be
HOWEVER, THE WAY INTERNAL
turned into a positive feature in the further pro-
cessing of the design proposal. FUNCTIONS ARE ARRANGED SUGGEST
A CHALLENGE THAT HAS TO BE DEALT WITH
In terms of architecture, the bridge solution is
a beautiful idea - aesthetically as well as meta-
IN THE NEXT PHASE. ALL THINGS CONSID-
phorically, but it would also present a significant ERED, OPEN CAMPUS IS, HOWEVER, A
challenge in relation to the construction budget. FASCINATING EDIFICE.
Conceptual drawing made by Erik Giudice Architects
29

A-LAB #156/64130476
BRIAN VARGO, JONAS NIELSEN & MATHIAS PALLE

DENMARK
The solution presents a clear layout of the site central urban space with intimate leisure areas.
and the public space. The basic concept is a gen- The traffic flow in the area has been planned in
erally open structure that provides good contact such a way that the school is located with good
and interweaves all the layers of the proposal conditions for arriving visitors from both the
in the urban space and within the building. The built-up side to the north, near Carl Blochs Gade,
proposal distinguishes itself by creating a good and from the south side, characterised by a soft
relationship between theory and practice and be- landscape. In this way the concept enhances the
tween general and specific areas. linear track bed-like nature of the area and brings
into play the sites history. Metaphorically speak-
RELATION TO THE SITE ing, architecture can be rolled out into the world.
The building has an unobtrusive identity and is
integrated into its surroundings through a con- IDEA, ARCHITECTURE, FUNCTION
fident intervention. The school of architecture is The buildings structural system seems well-con-
proposed organised in the north-south direction sidered. Its transformation into more managea-
immediately south of Godsbanen. This approach ble but nonetheless coherent spatial sequences
helps create a clear relation to Godsbanen and is among the competitions best attempts at mak-
the green wedge, which runs parallel to the ing structural principles that enrich the spatial
school. The green wedge is proposed as a pub- contexts. The concept has a clear identity with a
lic space that is able to interact with the schools proper structurally flexible grid of well-defined
activities and enrich the relationship and inter- zones. The design is embellished by large sliding
action between the institution and the urban doors that make possible contact between in-
environment. The green wedge is made into an doors and outdoors areas. The quality of the lay-
unpretentious and diverse arena with pavilions out lies in the orderly and systematic structuring
and workshops - a fine invitation to make archi- of uses, located in three levels within a rational
tectural education more conspicuous and visible and regular building volume.
to the public.
The building is organized in a three dimensional
The remaining site plan is rooted in an urban way, resulting in a spatial matrix in which theory,
backbone provided by Carl Blochs Gade. The practice and the various uses are merged to form
site plan is simple and robust. The area is clear- a diverse and rich spatial structure which allows
ly defined and provides a good framework for for several educational opportunities. The plan-
further development of the area. The proposal ning principle of methodically weaving together
contains fine and differentiated outdoor environ- functions vertically and horizontally supports the
ments that allow for a good flow and for people desired symbiosis between the many activities
moving lively around in the area. The solution of the school. Bringing together the architectural
for the green wedge appears a little vague and programme within a rich continuous arena, with
should be defined in more detail in the further horizontal open and closed layers, in combination
process. The proposal might benefit from defin- with decentralised vertical spaces creates useful
ing a stronger encounter with Godsbanen in a variation in the overall building structure. This re-
30
Exterior perspective made by Brian Vargo, Jonas Nielsen & Mathias Palle
31
BUILD
h the public and allow for informal interactions. It
SOCIALIZE
uld simply empower students with tools and an open
oratory so that they can learn by creating. ORGAN
TEPLAN CREATIVE CHEMISTRY A FLEXIBLE CONCEPT e.g. 1. Budgetary Requirements...

tools. Rather
massing These
of the school programmatic
will continue tool and
the axiality towers are incubators This concept is an open system that can adapt to meet
hitecture, the forThis
ction of Godsbanen. an placement
open field lets
for creativity
the Greenin the same way that the schools needs at they change from day to day or
N
nts to
dge authorto the heart
continue Godsbanen and
of the site andInstitute forwith
to connect (X) currently anchor the over time. Each function tower is surrounded by open
programs
pedestrianand
axis fromexperimentation
the city center. Ataround them. They will help further
this intersection lab-space; They can easily borrow from the lab-space to
ammon
largeneeds
open publictransform Godsbanearealerne
space which into Aarhus K a center
the surrounding provide temporary exhibition areas, critique venues, or
voids
ural of the feed for
programs creativity,
into. It is theart and culture.
outdoor The New School will give
laboratory added auditorium / event space. They can easily close
e.g. 2. Spatial Requirements...
1:2000
he connective students
architecture backand
by the
sharing
localitscommunity
functions around
to its perimeter such portions of their functions without affecting the operation
oors, allowing
eriment and engagethey
with can
eachbeother.
accessed by the public when desired. This of the entire school.
or innovation open campus allows interactions between students and The spatial concept is robust, and the design can
ources. the local community to occur naturally and informally. also easily evolve to meet needs in the phase two of
the competition. For example: (1) The number of tool
towers can easily be changed to respond to changes in
the budget. (2) The diagrammatic floorplan can evolve e.g. 3. Site Requirements...
T
Site boundary to something less regular to accommodate different
program requirements that arise in further design. (3)
The entire plot and/or building envelop can shift to
NEW INSTITUTE FOR (X)
fit changing needs of the masterplan or budgetary
constraints.
CRAFT AREA GODSBANEN GROUND FLOOR: AN OPEN LAB
A-LAB will break down traditional boundaries between
architectural theory and practice by providing an open
ecosystem for ideas and collaboration. It will be an open
laboratory that encourages informal experimentation both
inside and outside the building. The ground floor alternates N
in fixed public programs and open lab-space that can
accomodate various events and interactive programming.
The tool towers of the interior continue outwards as 1:500
small pavilions in the open park, programmed by other
complimentary functions outside of the school.
MIXED-USE BLOCK
5 FLOOR RESIDENTIAL OVER
1 FL COMMERCIAL/COMMUNITY BASE MIXED-USE BLOCK
ca. 8,000 m2 5 FLOOR RESIDENTIAL OVER PARKING HOUSE
1 FL COMMERCIAL/COMMUNITY BASE 5-6 STORY
ca. 9,000 m2 9000 m2
POROUS BORDER
Site plan 1:4000 madeA
byFUNCTIONAL SPINE
Brian Vargo, Jonas Nielsen & Mathias PalleA CLOSE CONNECTION SHARED SPACE / SECURE SPACE
towers and voids activate life all around the The towers also provide necessary mechanical, The towers and open atriums also connect theory The building is the centerpiece of a campus with access
meter through a soft edge that lets life flow storage, and programmatic services evenly and practice allowing the necessary distinction from alls sides. The ground floors of towers always have
n out. The school is the shared center-piece throughout the building in a very efficient between public and private
BUS TRANSIT SQUARE realms, but connecting public access. The space in between is a flex zone + either
n integrated urban vision. manner. the two worlds so they inspire one another. workshop/studio space or
CARperiodically open to the public.
DROP-OFF AREA
BIKE PARKING Access

BIKE PARKING to studio space above is regulated through the towers.
LIBRARY ARCHI-TEGN AUDITORIUM

OPEN FOR
VEHICLE ACCESS LAB-SPACE: LAB-SPACE: LAB-SPACE:
CRITIQUE GALLERY INFORMAL MEETING
INSTITUTE FOR (X) WORKSHOP

OR SIMILIAR PROGRAM COURTYARD Student Access
Flex Access (Exhibits, Events)
Always Public Access
THE TOOL TOWERS STUDY LAB-SPACE:

WORKSHOP
WORKSHOP
LAB-SPACE
EXHIBITION
CANTEEN
LAB-SPACE:
EXHIBITION
RECEPTION
0. Library: 350 m2 (gross)
1. Library: 175 m2
2. Discussion Group Rooms: 175 m2
MAIN ENTRY
ENTREPRENEURSHIP
CENTRE CRAFT
0. Archi-Tegn Book/Paper Store: 350 m2 (gross)
1. Robotic Lab: 125 m2
2. Material Labs: 1250 m2
LAB SPACE
3. Acoustics and Daylight Lab: 125 m2
MEET
0. Open Workshops: 2500 m2 (gross)
1. Studio Space: 2500 m2 WORKSHOP PAVILLION
2. Studio Space: 2500 m2 WORKSHOP PAVILLION
WORKSHOP PAVILLION 0. &1. Auditorium 350 m2 (gross)
2. Large Classroom 125 m2
WORKSHOP PAVILLION
WORKSHOP PAVILLION
WORKSHOP PAVILLION
SECT
CONNECT
ite boundary
Plan of the ground floor 1:1000 made by Brian Vargo, Jonas Nielsen & Mathias Palle
0. Entrepreneurship Centre: 75 m2 (gross)
1. Overnight Accomodation: 75 m2
32
BUILD
0. Open Workshop: 350 m2 (gross)
1. Wood Workshop: 125 m2
2. Metal Workshop: 125 m2 An Efficient Form
an institute can engage through architecture. Rather than area for added uses. colleagues throughout the school.
STUDY
be defined by a singular architectural doctrine, the school
CRAFT
should be an open framework for experimentation as
MEET
Godsbanearealerne already is. It should not just be an
architecture school It should be an open laboratory for
the evolution of architecture. It should share its program
BUILD NE
with the public and allow for informal interactions. It
SOCIALIZE
should simply empower students with tools and an open
laboratory so that they can learn by creating. ORGANIZE
SITEPLAN
The massing of the school will continue the axiality and
direction of Godsbanen. This placement lets the Green
N
Wedge continue to the heart of the site and to connect with
the pedestrian axis from the city center. At this intersection
is a large open public space which the surrounding
sults in many good and flexible combinations of
cultural programs feed into. It is the outdoor laboratory SUMMARY: THE ENTRY WORKS1:2000
VERY
for architecture students and the local community to
use, but also in other.
several acoustic challenges and
experiment and engage with each
CONVINCINGLY IN THE CONTEXT AND HELPS
needs that have to be resolved to provide space
for contemplation and concentration. PROVIDE STRUCTURE TO THE URBAN LAND- 5
1 FL C
SCAPE IN A PLAUSIBLE WAY. THE ARCHI-

Site
The entry appears relatively boundary
pragmatic and re-
TECTURAL EXPRESSION OF THE BUILDING,
alistic both economically and environmentally.
The building is consistently designed as a kind of HOWEVER, IS SOMEWHAT ANONYMOUS,
academic workshop environment with close inte- YET POSSESSES AN ASTOUNDING NUMBER
gration between practical and theoretical teach-
ing and research contexts. In construction and OF QUALITIES THAT MIGHT BE DEVELOPED
choice of materials the building is a raw and ro- FURTHER - PARTICULARLY IN TERMS OF
bust framework for the studies and the research
THE WAY IT IS ORGANISED.
that would unfold in such a building - as a labora-
tory the school of architecture can make its own.
THE A-LAB ENTRY DEFINITELY HAS THE

POTENTIAL TO BE DEVELOPED INTO A SUS-
TAINABLE SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND IS,
IN GENERAL, AN INTERESTING ANATOMICAL
A POROUS BORDER A FUNCTIONAL SPINE A CLOSE CONNECTION SHARED SPACE / SECURE SPACE
The towers and voids activate life all around the
perimeter through a soft edge that lets life flow
The towers also provide necessary mechanical,
storage, and programmatic services evenly
SOLUTION WHEN SEEN IN RELATION TO THE
The towers and open atriums also connect theory
and practice allowing the necessary distinction
The building is the centerpiece of a campus with access
from alls sides. The ground floors of towers always have
in an out. The school is the shared center-piece
of an integrated urban vision.
throughout the building in a very efficient
manner.
OPPORTUNITIES PROVIDED BY A FUTURE
between public and private realms, but connecting
the two worlds so they inspire one another.
public access. The space in between is a flex zone + either
workshop/studio space or periodically open to the public.
Access to studio space above is regulated through the towers.
ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION.
Site
Student Access
Flex Access (Exhibits, Events)
Always Public Access
THE TOOL TOWERS STUDY

0. Library: 350 m2 (gross)
1. Library: 175 m2
CRAFT
0. Archi-Tegn Book/Paper Store: 350 m2 (gross)
1. Robotic Lab: 125 m2
2. Material Labs: 1250 m2
LAB SPACE
3. Acoustics and Daylight Lab: 125 m2
MEET
0. Open Workshops: 2500 m2 (gross)
1. Studio Space: 2500 m2
2. Studio Space: 2500 m2
0. &1. Auditorium 350 m2 (gross)
SECTION 1:500
CONNECT
0. Entrepreneurship Centre: 75 m2 (gross)
1. Overnight Accomodation: 75 m2
BUILD
0. Open Workshop: 350 m2 (gross)
1. Wood Workshop: 125 m2
2. Metal Workshop: 125 m2
3. Ceramics Lab: 125 m2
SOCIALIZE
0. Canteen 300 m2 (gross)
1. Student Center 125 m2
2. Student Kitchen 125 m2
3. Student Kitchen 125 m2
ORGANIZE
0. Reception: 350 m2 (gross)
1. External Relations /Intern Center: 250 m2
2. Administrative/Technical Staff:
3. Administrative/Technical Staff:
250 m2
250 m2
ELEVATION 1:5
4. Academic Staff: 250 m2
Conceptual drawing made by Brian Vargo, Jonas Nielsen & Mathias Palle
33

AN OPEN FRAME FOR ARCHITECTURE #220/92070479
ATELIER LORENTZEN LANGKILDE

DENMARK
This proposal places the school of architecture in ings have more limited opening hours. Study
a public context in a general and overall way. The spaces are organized on the ground level and
proposal approaches the school of architecture relate to both indoor and outdoor spaces. This
as a single building volume on a large scale with gives the large floor plane an interesting design
good potential for change over time. which has not in the same way been redeemed
in the building volume. This solution also pos-
RELATION TO THE SITE es a challenge as study spaces are organized in
In terms of architecture, the proposal appears very open spaces. This needs to be further devel-
resolved, presenting a captivating and elegant oped in order to achieve the necessary intimacy
design, but is somewhat uncertain in relation to for individual students.
the green wedge and Godsbanen. The proposal
organizes the remaining functions between the The great quality of the proposal is the relation-
school of architecture and Carl Blochs Gade, re- ship between a fascinating range of materials, the
spects the green wedge, but does not seem to distinct building volume, the large open space,
develop any nuanced relationship to the close and the inner buildings. The proposal also uses
contextual surroundings. The jury, however, con- the roof as a resource, in the form of a green gar-
siders this to be a challenge that might be solved den with solar panels. The arrangement consist-
by applying the same elegant and distinct ap- ing of the inner buildings, the existing tarpaulin
proach that was used in the interior of the build- building, a glass house and a wooden house help
ing. The buildings demarcation between indoor to create a refined and versatile environment
and outdoor areas hints at the possibility of cre- with the potential of becoming a distinctive fea-
ating zones and places that might root the build- ture of the new school of architecture. Combined
ing to the site in a better way. with multipurpose, high-ceilinged spaces, the
inserted smaller volumes, in processed forms,
IDEA, ARCHITECTURE, FUNCTION provide a school with an architectural basic struc-
The building-related solution has a clear archi- ture that contains a functional and programmatic
tectural appearance with a concept that gives the flexibility in a longer perspective. The solution,
proposal a clear identity as a kind of generous however, seems oversized in terms of volume
academic hangar. and footprint. For this reason the proposal is eco-
nomically extremely challenging and should be
Basic logistics are rooted in a rational, proper reduced in scale as the architectural composition
building prism with programmed fields. The con- is distilled further. The jury, however, believes
cept is reinforced by differentiated zones. Some this would be possible without critical loss of ar-
take the form of spaces within spaces, others are chitectural qualities.
open bright areas. Large sliding doors contrib-
ute to a contact between the indoor and outdoor
areas. The concept of the proposal is also based
on a floor with an open area that is in use all 24
hours of the day whereas the three inner build-
34
Exterior perspective made by Atelier Lorentzen Langkilde
35
Wood House
Could it be as simple as an open framework for creativity, at ground level and spaces with a 12h-8h active use are Old House
Glass House
like a three-dimensional canvas? located on the upper levels.
Green
(2) Wedge
CTIVE
We believe that this is exactly what a school for architec- A school of architecture is truly defined by the students Preserved house
ture should be an invitation to create, a robust space for and the way they use their studios. It is here that the work,
innovation, anAARHUS
open spaceSCHOOL
for knowledge-sharing
OF ARCHITECTUREwhere process,
| THEmethod
DANISH andBUILDING
results of the& school become
PROPERTY AGENCY
Reading | NEW Support
/ writing niche AARCH houses
JURY connected
REPORT by exhibition
EENideas
ROOFhatch and new concepts flow freely between apparent. It is here that the conception and study of and workshop gallery - The
Individual Gallery
panels of acous-
with Architecture
students Raised terrace tic absorption on wheels
een energy roof and teachers.
with Photovoltaic architecture takes place. The studios are the true soul of
Studios raised 40 cm Raised terrace Projection wall The Architecture Project could be integrated as a special
nels and LAR a school, and therefore we believe that they should be Individual tables
house in the school of architecture with
for maximum interac-
A School of architecture dedicated to and designed for directly linked to the urban spaces, creating a living and Super furniture tion and cooperation. secure storage on
NVASinvestigation, experimentation and prototyping. This is vibrant neighborhood that is acitve 24/7. Consequently all wheels
ubleAarhus school
skin glass facade.of Architecture An open frame for archi- studios are placed on the ground floor along the facades. Studio
signed for optimal natural light
tecture. Team workshop
Team meeting
d natural ventilation combined with
The beating heart of the school, the support facilities and
eheating of air in wintertime and Studio Panel on table with
elligent passive energy production. Studio workshops, are
Gallery organized in three separate
Studio houses linked acoustic absorption
Possible additional houses Zoning creates individua
together by an exhibition Section
and workshop gallery connecting inside the canvas within the large space
Godsbanen with the Green Wedge.
STUDIOS. HOUSES. FRAME.
OUSES Zoning becomes important in very large spaces in order The exhibition and workshop gallery Gallery of Archi- The frame around the school consists of a double-skin
ree houses with support functions: Housing block 3-4 levels
to create lesser more intimate spaces that the body can tecture - spans the entire school and connects the studios glass facade, a soft white translucent screen that allows
eserved house
relate to, scaled according to need and function. with the three houses. Here the public, the employees and daylight to pass through but filters direct sunlight and sur-
ass House
od House We zone the ground floor by: the students can meet up and share ideas. The gallery acts plus heat. Thus even the center of the building has acces
- Slightly elevating the studios from the ground. This as connection and access-point to workshops, studios and to natural light. The glass facade is supported by a timber AR
Parking house defines each studio and offers a workshop terrace for each social areas and forms the backbone of the school. structure that colours the grand architecural frame with a
studio. delicate warm nordic atmosphere. The double-skin facade Lev
UDIOS
- Large scale super-furniture that forms benches, niches From the Gallery of Architecture you have access to the is designed to give optimal natural lighting conditions and
ning of ground level by raised Lev
races for concentration, storage, acoustic separations and privacy three houses that contain the main support-functions of to use natural ventilation in combination with preheating
where needed. the school. Each house has its own unique architectural of air in wintertime and intelligent passive energy produc-
expression. The first is a preserved existing timber house tion. Lev
The studios and individual workspaces are optimized reprogrammed with social spaces. The second is a closed
for activity-based work, comprising areas for both group glass house lined with large-scale shelfs for models, mate- The roof is a green energy field. Access is through the Lev
Dialog and individual work as well as areas zoned for high- and rials and tools, containing workshops and auditoriums. The wood house. On the roof you find a reading garden be-
low-concentration activities.
Mini towers third is a wooden house consisting mainly of book-shelves, tween wild grasses and maybe an urban garden where the Lev
containing media and knowledge-spaces. The use of differ- school canteen grows its own vegetables and herbs. At
Base with parking Studios are separated by a shared space for workshops, ent materials ind the three buildings serves as case-stud- the southern end photo-voltaic panels produce energy and
vidual on 1 level Team work Tot
critique and social activities, formed by the terracing of the ies for archictecture, examples of tectonics and materiality support the sustainable profile of the school.
floor and various super-furniture. within the greater school, that becomes in itself an archi-
tectural laboratory.
Immersion Each student has exclusive access to a work-desk framed
by pin-up boards both in front and behind in order to pro- Additional houses in other materials can be built within
Godsbanen
vide sufficient panel space and a degree of intimacy. the greater frame if the school is to be extended, thus ex-
de
Archi Hotel
Ga
panding the opportunity for further material studies. ck
s
lo
lB
Book lounge
r
Ca
Main functions:
2
Studios, Workshops, Exhibition,Row houses
Canteen Roof garden
Municipal
plot 1
2
Workshops, Auditoriums, Media lab. Green library
Art and Architecture Wood house

2
Administration,
Parking house PH.Ds Square Level +3 - Access to roof garden
Studio Barbecue
Municipal terrace
2
Archi Hotel, Study zone plot 2
Lounge Cantine
Outdoor terrace Wild grass Scandinavian Congress
Reading garden
2
Technical areas Centre
de
Wild grass Roof garden
ga
es
Cantine garden
nn
Kitchen
So
Team bar New street
Aarhus school of
2 Parking Studio terrace Stair
Team bar architecture
Team bar
plot Caf
DEVELOPMENTS. Team bar
Team bar
Green wedge
The parking and municipal plots form a flexible area for Photovoltaic
Administration Bridge
future development. panels
Studio
Stair
terrace Toi Toi
Lounge
Studio terrace PH.D. office
Preserved house
Level +2 Student bar Glass house
Work bar Wood house
Outdoor terrace Level +2
Study bar Study bar Lounge bar Level +2
Stair
Outdoor path
Auditorium / Auditorium / Auditorium / Auditorium / Folding door
Workshop Workshop Workshop Workshop
Green
Wedge
Site plan 1:4000 made by Atelier Lorentzen Langkilde Stair

Study
Lounge Shelf walls Archive
Lounge Bridge
Open down Sound Light

Toi Toi
Stair Library
Book Stair
Preserved house
Level +1 Glass house
Level +1 Wood house
Study bar Study bar Lounge bar Level +1
Shelf walls
Street Studio Terrace

SITE PLAN 1:2000
Mock up
Studio Terrace Loading workshops

N
Team meeting
Team meeting Team meeting

Studio Terrace 3D printing Studio Terrace
Studio Studio Studio
Model workshop Model workshop
Robotics Metal workshop Wood workshop
Model workshop
2D printing
Team exhibition Archi Tegn Storage Printing
Storage
Printing Toi Toi
Afternoon sun Teaching and Exhibition Kitchen
terrace Presenting Stair
1 Godsbanen
Exhibition
Lounge area
Shop Book Stair
Student caf Gallery of Architecture Wood house with access to
Exhibition
Green Wedge Workshops
roof garden
Printing Storage
Storage Printing Mock up Large gate
Team exhibition Storage
Reading niche Printing Studio
Studio Terrace Mock up Cantine
N
Reading niche Book stair

Common Space
Model workshop
Studio Studio Model workshop Studio Model workshop
Storage
Bridges Studio
Art and Architecture
Square
GR
Team meeting Critic Team meeting Great Hall
2

Glass house Team meeting Square
Great Hall
Team meeting
Mock up
Exhibition Cantine
Mock up
New Street Mock up Studio Terrace
Studio
Studio Terrace
Lunch sun terrace
Study Bar Mock ups
Studio Terrace Reading niches
Super furniture
Green Wedge Team meeting
Workshop
Studio terrace Studio Studio
Study Bar Studio terrace
Team meeting Mock ups
Plan of the ground floor 1:1000 made by Atelier Lorentzen Langkilde
Gallery of architecture
Super furniture
Super furniture Team meeting
Studio terrace
Studio Exhibition
Studio
36 Preserved house
Reading niches
Team meeting
Archi Tegn Super furniture

500 Team meeting
Studio
Auditorium
Studio terrace
LO
Reading niches
Mock ups Studio
Studio terrace
12h
! 24h
CANVAS
Double skin glass
Designed for opti
The three-dimensional and natural ventil
Program organization Section
canvas preheating of air
in relation to active hours of use
intelligent passive
Studios along facades Plan
Wood House
IDEA AARHUS SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE
PROGRAM | THE DANISH BUILDING & PROPERTY AGENCY | NEW AARCH JURY REPORT
The
How simple can a school of architecture be? The program are organized according to potential ac- Architecture
HOUSES
Could it be a large workshop space with maximum volume tive hours-of-use to maximize interaction with context Project Three houses with
Preserved house
for maximum flexibility? and Godsbanen. Spaces with 24h active use are located Glass House
Wood House Glass House
Could it be as simple as an open framework for creativity, at ground level and spaces with a 12h-8h active use are Old House
Wood House
Glass House
like a three-dimensional canvas? located on the upper levels.
Green
Wedge
We believe that this is exactly what a school for architec- A school of architecture is truly defined by the students Preserved house
STUDIOS
ture should be an invitation to create, a robust space for and the way they use their studios. It is here that the work,
Zoning of ground
innovation, an open space for knowledge-sharing where process, method and results of the school become Support houses connected by exhibition terraces
ideas hatch and new concepts flow freely between apparent. It is here that the conception and study of and workshop gallery - The Gallery of Architecture
students and teachers. architecture takes place. The studios are the true soul of
The Architecture Project could be integrated as a special
a school, and therefore we believe that they should be house in the school of architecture for maximum interac-
A School of architecture dedicated to and designed for directly linked to the urban spaces, creating a living and tion and cooperation.
investigation, experimentation and prototyping. This is vibrant neighborhood that is acitve 24/7. Consequently all
Aarhus school of Architecture An open frame for archi- studios are placed on the ground floor along the facades.
tecture.
The beating heart of the school, the support facilities and
Individual
workshops, are organized in three separate houses linked Zoning creates individual studios
together by an exhibition and workshop gallery connecting within the large space
SUMMARY: THE CONCEPT NEEDS TO BE ENHANCED AND DEVELOPED IN RELATION TO THE Godsbanen with the Green Wedge.
Im
Housing block 3-4 levels
SITE PLAN BUT THE JURY FINDS THAT THE CONVINCING ARCHITECTURAL STATEMENT IS
AREAS.
SUFFICIENTLY STRONG TO WITHSTAND THIS. THE BUILDING ITSELF IS CHARACTERISED BY

Main func
Parking house
Level +0 7.306 m2 Studios, W
Level +1 1.554 m2 Workshop
AN ARCHITECTURAL QUALITY AND NATURE THAT HAS BEEN SO CAREFULLY PREPARED AND Level +2 1.554 m2 Administr
Level +3 550 m2 Archi Hot

HAS SUCH A FINE COMPOSITIONAL STATURE THAT WE FIND THAT THE OVERALL ARCHITEC-
Mini towers Level -1 2.000 m2 Technical
TURAL CONCEPT MIGHT ACTUALLY BE HONED FURTHER BASED ON A MORE COMPACT AND
Base with parking
on 1 level Total 12.964 m 2
REALISTIC BRIEF FROM THE COMPETITION INITIATOR IN THE NEXT STAGE. Godsbanen
e
ad
sG
ck
lo
r lB
Ca
Row houses
Municipal
DESPITE THE ABOVE OBJECTIONS, THE PROPOSAL IN GENERAL REPRESENTS A

plot 1

Parking house Square
Studio
FASCINATING EDIFICE WITH STRONG SPATIAL RELATIONS AND AN INTERESTING Municipal terrace
plot 2
Cantine
Outdoor terrace Scandinavian Congress
Reading garden Centre
de
Wild grass
ga
RANGE OF MATERIALS.
es
Cantine garden
nn
So
New street
Aarhus school of
Parking Studio terrace
architecture
plot
DEVELOPMENTS.
Green wedge
The parking and municipal plots form a flexible area for Photovoltaic
future development. panels
Studio
terrace
Studio terrace
Student bar
Outdoor terrace
Outdoor path
Green
Wedge
Afternoo
terra
Green Wed
SITE PLAN 1:2000
Godsbanen
Wood house with access to

roof garden
Studio
N
Book stair
Bridges GROUND FLOOR 1:500

Glass house Square
Great Hall
Exhibition Cantine
New Street
Studio
Study Bar Mock ups
Reading niches
Super furniture
Team meeting
Workshop D
Studio terrace Studio Studio
Study Bar Studio terrace
Team meeting Mock ups
Gallery of architecture
Super furniture
Super furniture Team meeting
Studio terrace
Studio Exhibition
Preserved house Studio

Reading niches
Team meeting
Archi Tegn Super furniture

Team meeting
Studio
Auditorium
Studio terrace
LONGITUDINAL SECTION 1:5
Reading niches
Mock ups Studio
Studio terrace
Green Wedge
Team meeting Studio terrace
Mock ups Studio

Student bar Super furniture
Team meeting
Studio terrace
Studio
Green Wedge
D
Studio terrace
Conceptual drawing made by Atelier Lorentzen Langkilde
ORGANISATION SOUTH EAST FACADE 1:500
37
#011
03 6 41 494
Exterior perspective made by ADEPT
IN T E R IO R P E R S P E C T IV E
BAN VILLAGE WITH

NT WHERE SCHOOL
ONS AND SPATIAL
ND SOCIAL SPACES
GE STRUCTURE AS
TION AND CREATI-
+
th e s tu d e n t to b e c o n n e c te d
fo r a r tis tic e x p e r im e n ts , a ls o
e + L a b p ro p o s e s a n u rb a n
s b a n e a re a le r n e is a b s o rb e d
tim e in a r o b u s t a n d s c a la b le
to k e e p th e e x is tin g id e n tity
tio n b e n e t t i n g b o th .
VILLAGE LAB VILLAGE + LAB

y n a m ic c h a r a c te r o f m o d e r n
C a r l B lo c h s G a d e
1 0 o o r s N e w d e v e lo p m e n t 3 - 5 o o r s
7 000m 2
P l o t s i z e : 1 700 m 2 3 - 5 o o r s
Conceptual diagram made by ADEPT

N e w d e v e lo p m e n t 3 - 5 o o r s
4 000 m 2
P l o t s i z e : 1 8 00 m 2 3 - 5 o o r s 3 - 5 o o r s
R o y a l A c a d e m y o f
M u s i c 38
in A a r h u s N e w d e v e lo p m e n t
6 000 m 2
5 o o r s P l o t s i z e : 2 200 m 2
PURCHASE DKK 25,000

ARCHITECTURE VILLAGE + LAB #011/03641494
ADEPT
E C T IV E IN T E R IO R P E R S P E C T IV
DENMARK
TURE VILLAGE + LAB CONNECTS TWO WORLDS: THE DIVERSITY AND HUMAN SCALE OF THE URBAN VILLAGE WITH
DYNAMIC AND PRODUCTIVE LAB SPACES. CREATING A TOTALLY EMBEDDED URBAN ENVIRONMENT WHERE SCHOOL
N LIFE CAN MEET AND INTERACT. VILLAGE + LAB OFFERS AN UNSEEN INTEGRATION OF FUNCTIONS AND SPATIAL
ES. SPACES OF FOCUS AND CONCENTRATION ARE CONTRASTED BY EFFICIENT, TRANSPARENT AND SOCIAL SPACES
Inspired
CTION, EXHIBITION AND by theVILLAGE
TEACHING. informal+ atmosphere
LAB TAKES THEat Gods- The proposal
BEST ELEMENTS FROM offers
THEaVILLAGE
clever staging of alleys,
STRUCTURE AS
T TO CREATE A MODERN CAMPUS EXPERIENCE
banearealerne, which shouldTHAT ENHANCES
preferably KNOWLEDGE
be main- SHARING,
passageways PRODUCTION
and courtyard AND
areas in CREATI-
a well-com-
tained, the modest scale of the locality is applied posed and somewhat cute site plan, demon-
with a downsized and dissolved village-like site strating a credible and well-proportioned res-
t h e s ch o o l a n d t h e si t e r e l a t e s t o t h e co n ce p t o f t h e sm a l l t o w n o r t h e vi l l a g e . T h e e xi st i n g sch o o l st r u ct u r e w i t h m a n y l o ca t i o n s i n t h e ci t y ce n t e r a l l o w s f o r t h e st u d e n t t o b e co n n e ct e d
plan around an open paved street
n , w i t h a st r o n g i d e n t i t y . A s a st u d e n t , yo u r e a p a r t o f ci t y l i f e i n a h u m a n sca
space. Exist- idential construction of 3-5 floors facing Carl
l e . G o d sb a n e a r e a l e r n e h a s a se l f - g r o w n , r a w ch a r a ct e r a n d i s a p l a yg r o u n d f o r a r t i st i c e xp e r i m e n t s, a l so
f e e l i n g . W e p r o p o se t o t r a n sl a t e ing t h e se buildings
q u a l i t i e s o f i d e are
n t i t y , sca used l e a n d foru r b a the n co n school
n e ct i vi t y i n t and
o a co n new t e m p o r a r y Blochs
a n d f u n ct Gade.i o n a l a r ch i t e ct u r a l co n ce p t . V i l l a g e + L a b p r o p o se s a n u r b a n
o l o g y t h a t a l l o w s f o r sm a l l e r ch a r a ct e r i st i c b u i l d i n g s w i t h u n i q u e i d e n t i t i e s ye t u n i t e d a n d f u n ct i o n a l .
buildings added. Everything is staged structural-
ly using a grid-like structure, the fields of which As a school of architecture the separate units are
n ct i o n a l n e e d s o f m o d e r n a r ch i t e ct u r a l r e se a r ch a n d e d u ca t i o n r e q u i r e r o o m f o r t e st i n g a n d p r o d u ct i o n . W i t h o u r p r o p o sa l t h e r a w ch a r a ct e r o f t h e G o d sb a n e a r e a l e r n e i s a b so r b e d
r a t o r y f o r a r ch i t e ct u r a l e xp e r i m e can
n t s. F l be
e xi b filled
l e sp a ce with s a n d sp brick a ce s f and o r m u l glass,
t i p l e u se a reflecting
r e cr e a t e d t h a a t ca self-
n h a n d l e deemed
t h e ch a n g i n g inexpedient,
si t u a t i o n s a n d d e m and a n d s the o ve r t spatial
i m e i n a r o descriptions
b u st a n d sca la b le
t e t h e w o r l d i n t o a cr e a t i ve l a b o r a t o r y f o r a r ch i t e ct u r a l e xp e r i m e n t s. S e l e ct e d e xi st i n g b u i l d i n g s a r e i n t e g r a t e d i n t o t h e n e w i n n e r l a b sp a ce s, a l l o w i n g u s t o ke e p t h e e xi st i n g i d e n t i t y
u i l d i n g s. T h e l a b s a r e t h u s b o t h emerged
p r o d u ct i ve sp industrial
a ce s o f l e a r n i n complex.
g , e xh i b i t i o n a n d w o r k a s w e l l a s so ci a l sp a ce s oand f i n t e r a the
ct i o n , appertaining
b r i d g i n g u r b a n l i f e a sections
n d p r o d u ct i o n are b e n not
e t t i n g convinc-
b o th .
B
ingly articulated architectonically. The proposal
w o r l d s o f vi l l a g e a n d l a b c r e a t e The
s a n e w additional
sch o o l o f a r ch buildings
i t e ct u r e a s i n t e in g r a tthe e d , p rcompetition
o d u ct i ve a n d w e l co area, m i n g p a r t was,
o f t h e ci however,
ty . chosen for purchase because of its
, co n ce n t r a t e d a n d p r i va t e sp a ce s i n t h e vi l l a g e st r u ct u r e a r e i n t e g r a t e d w i t h t h e l a b o r a t o r y st r u ct u r e f o r d i sp l a y , sp a ce a n d o p e n n e s.
which are suggested built in brick (like the
s f o r a t o t a l l y i n cl u si ve u r b a n e xp e r i e n ce w i t h a d i ve r si t y o f sp a t i a l e xp e r i e n ce s f r o m t h e i n t i m a cy a n d h u m a n sca exist- empathy l e o f t h e vi l l a g e t o t h e f u n ct for
and respect i o n a the
l a n d identity
d yn a m i c ch a of r a ct the
e r o f place.
m o d e rn
u ct i o n .
ing buildings), are contrasted by a more transpar-
ent laboratory structure, providing high-ceilinged
multi-usable workshop facilities for the school.
i r e d b y t h e d u a l i sm o f t h e vi l l a g e t yp o -
y t yp o l o g y .
r e i s b r o ke n d o w n i n a h u m a n sca le , w ith
t e d r o o f s. E a c h f u n ct i o n i s g i ve n i t s o w n
s f r i e n d l y a n d w e l co m i n g . H o w e ve r , t h e
o p e n a n d t r a n sp a r e n t , a l l o w i n g l e ve l s o f
h e l a b o r a t o r y a r ch i t e ct u r e i s f u l l y e xi b -
e i g h t i s b i g a n d t h e sp a ce s o f f e r s m u l t i p l e
o p e n a n d i n vi t i n g . T h e e xi st i n g b u i l d i n g s 1 0
r a t e d i n t h e l a b o r a t o r y t yp o l o g y . T h e y S ko vg a a r d sg a d e
sp a ce s a n d r e e ct a t r a n si t i o n f r o m t h e
o n t h e G o d sb a n e a r e a l e r n e t o d a y t o a
p l a ce i n t h e ci t y .
ATERIALITY, LIGHT, COLOR AND

C a r l B l o ch s G a d e G o d sb a n e n
tin g ! T h e m a te r ia ls a r e u n ite d b y a g r id ,
i t e d i f f e r e n t l y r e g a r d i n g t h e vi l l a g e a n d
R o ay l A ac d e m y o f
y m a d e f r o m b r i ck i n d i f f e r e n t b a n d s . T h i s M u si c i n A a r h u s
a l i t y o f t h e si t e a n d i t i s p o si b l e t o m a ke
so m e se m i - o p e n , so m e cl o se d - a n d t r a n -
b e t w e e n t h e se .
sca l e i s h u m a n e . T h e m o o d i s co zy . T h e
t r a t i o n a n d e m e r si o n . 2202b
a r i l y m a d e f r o m l i g h t ca st co n cr e t e e l e -
l a s p a n e l s. T h e sca l e o f sp a ce i s b i g g e r h u se n e
d r e m a i n s t h e sa m e t o co n n e ct t h e t w o
a xi m u m e xi b i l i t y . n e w d e ve lo p m e n t
A A R C H
t h e cr e a t i ve e xp e r i m e n t s a r e o n d i sp l a y . 1 3 000 m 2 S C C
o m a l l si d e s. T h e f e e l i s i n d u st r i a l a n d p l o t si ze : 9 5 00 S o n n e sg a d e
r t i m e e ve n a d d s st o r i e s a n d l a ye r s t o
8 45 q
n e w d e ve lo p m e n t
S r e n F r i ch s ve j
P a r ki n g
A A R C H +
a d d i t i o n a l 4 000 m 2
a d d i t i o n a l p l o t si ze : 2 5 00m 2
D e n se ci t y T h e W e d g e
Site plan 1:4000 made by ADEPT

E ve n t a re a
D S B IC
39
T h e W e d g e
N
#014
OF ARCHITECTURE #04344322
nstein
Exterior perspective made by Bogle Architects
Interior perspective made by Bogle Architects
40
6.
EXPERIMENTATION
PURCHASE DKK 25,000 composition. The concept is based on a large

exterior volume, in terms of scale, which can be
NEW AARCH #014/04344322
compressed during a given period of time. Thus
a permanent exterior frame is established which
BOGLE ARCHITECTS creates a large central space internally. Above this
UNITED KINGDOM space a strong structural grid is designed where
a room of boxes may be installed in time. This is
fascinating as a principle but appears unrealis-
tic in relation to the competitions practicability
2. 3.
The entry has a clear strategy in relation to the and economic conditions. Nevertheless, the jury
site plan where the school of architecture is placed would like to praise the idea of one large central
parallel to Carl Blochs Gade, and the additional ar- arrival hall, the design of which is one of the most
chitectural programme is placed to the south and interesting of the competition. The first thing to
east. In this way the former railway goods termi- greet a visitor is the schools activities in the
nal Godsbanen and Aarhus School of Architec- workshop and mock-up facilities, and the visual
ture are placed on an equal footing. This interven- contact and transparency between the functions
E CONDITION BOUNDARY
tion helps create a certain atmosphere of variety of the building are given pride ofCONNECTION
place. The hall
in the east-west direction that works very well in seems to be somewhat out of proportion but at
5. 6.
the context. The entry has furthermore been com- the same time it appears to be an intense and
posed in a holistic manner which secures a green beautiful space that might provide a good gath-
connection from the south. The overall site plan ering place for the school. The building volume is
contains some fine characteristics and creates a clearly designed using resource demanding solu-
comprehensible system for urban spaces, arriv- tions. The entry contains several interesting qual-
al and orientation. The entrys proposed design ities but does not appear realizable in relation to
for the school of architecture has an interesting the terms of the competition and project.
TENTIAL OPEN SCHOOL PUBLIC FACILITY
Site plan 1:4000 made by Bogle Architects
41
#037
Exterior perspective made by JWH Arkitekter + Vesthardt Arkitekter
Interior perspective made by JWH Arkitekter + Vesthardt Arkitekter
42
PURCHASE DKK 25,000 expression of the complex. The chosen building

system, the simple geometry of the body of the
HOUSE OF ARCHITECTURE #037/12282623
building and the proposed spatial dispositions
testify to an extensive insight into organizing a
JWH ARKITEKTER + VESTHARDT ARKITEKTER building and creating spatial variety within rel-
DENMARK atively dry schematics. The jury was puzzled by
the high-ceilinged rooms being assigned to the
studios instead of the workshop facilities, which
are placed in the more low-ceilinged section.
A slender and very well-proportioned building
complex stretches away from the west leg of the It is a democratic building through and through
Godsbanen building, presenting the new school where everyone appears to have the same rela-
of architecture as a beautiful, low and elongated tion to and association with the different activi-
building complex which in every way appears ties and functions of the school. We find this to be
settled and well-articulated. The proposed de- both a quality and a challenge. Furthermore, the
velopment structure facing Carl Blochs Gade is building seems to be organized based on well-
one of the very best of the competition, and it known building models which apparently fail to
complements the low row of residential build- challenge the schools activities sufficiently.
ings on the eastern side of the road in a very
flattering way. Despite the many spatial qualities of the pro-
posal, the jury finds that it would be difficult for
The tarpaulin building, which is worthy of pres- the building to accommodate a more changea-
ervation, is effortlessly included into the large ble architectural programme over time. The jury
building and, along with an oculatory and an au- wishes, however, to commend the entry for its
ditorium, lends variation to the otherwise formal well-organized and characterful appearance.
Site plan 1:4000 made by JWH Arkitekter + Vesthardt Arkitekter
43
#051
50 MM
19127100
405 MM
Exterior perspective made by OP

580 MM
Exterior perspective made by OP
44
EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE
We want to create a sustainable and robust framework

PURCHASE
that deals with DKK 25,000 of architecture and history,
the essentials
A PRIMITIVE
as well as the knowledge HUT #051/19127100
and tecnology of the here and
now.
OP INTERIOR CO
DENMARK
A PRIMITIVE HUT is a starting point - a Point Zero of architecture. It has been Laugiers expression is pro-Greek Classicism and reacts against the Baroque THE AARCH HU
a standard in architectural theory since Vitruvius. The architectural theorist ornamentation and decoration of his day. It established the argument for future connects The W
Marc-Antoine Laugier brought the idea to life with an image of the hut as the architectural movements, including 18th century Neoclassicism and the 21st Godsbanen to
frontispiece for the second edition of Laugiers Essay on Architecture (1755). century trend toward unadorned, eco-friendly tiny homes and small dwellings. The vast glass en
The Primitive Hut-idea supports a back-to-nature philosophy, a romantic idea, with the immedi
The theory states that Ancient Greek temples owe their form to the earliest which gained popularity in the mid-18th century and influenced literature, art,
The jury wishes to commend this proposal for its gramme. Being an architecture school, the plan
habitations erected by man. In the primitive hut, the horizontal beam was
supported by tree trunks planted upright in the ground, and the roof was
music, and architecture.
Simplicity of design and the use of natural materials are architectural essentials,
THE ROOF holds
This is where the
sloped to shed rainwater. This was the inspiration behind the basic Doric order. and they are familiar ideas that have been embraced by modern architects. The students wo
conceptual boldness. The entrant attempts to cre- arrangement appears too static, formalistic, and floors. A wide v
It was sought to be the ideal principle for architecture or any structure at the We dont all have to agree with these ideas, but its a good idea to understand lively an vibrant
ate a strong frametime. Laugierbased
believed on
it wasthe fundamental
the standard ide- embodied.
form which all architecture functionally
them.unsuitable
Ideas shape everything in relation to the
we create, including needsEveryone
architecture. of has a creative efforts o
philosophy, which develops over time. Towards the Sou
as of architecture.
TEACHERThe building is shaped with an a future architecture school. The powerful expres-
AND PUPIL Grand Auditorium
In the picture, a teacher (the personification of Architecture) points out a simple All we can do is ask students questions: How should buildings be built? What the view to the c
oversized roof, shelterdesigned with permanent
to a pupil (the unknowing, naive architect). Thefunc-
structure shesiveness
points to of the
should citiesdesign
look like? Why appears disproportionate
should all architecture have certain elements? backdrop and at
is simplistic in design, using basic geometric shapes, and is constructed from light deep into th
tions, whichthat covers
natural a space with an adaptable to the aims
elements. Laugiers Primitive Hut is his representation
all architecture derives from this simple ideal.
of the philosophy If youof the competition. At the same
want
to start.
to understand architecture maybe the time
primitive hut a good place
architecturalLaugierprogramme. The roof the building the entrant

theorizes that man wants nothing but shade from the sun and shelter
has made a valuable contribution: an
BECOMING AN ARCHITECT is a lifelong project. This new school of architecture
from storms. The man is willing to make himself an abode which covers but FLEX-SPACE
is shaped as a triangular parallelogram-shaped architecture
not buries him, Laugier writes. Pieces of wood raised perpendicularly, give us school should, to the best of its abil-
is to become a starting point.
The hut, or the shelter, is not just an archetypical space, but also a fundamental The entire groun
the idea of columns. The horizontal pieces that are laid upon them, afford us condition. Its a foundation for students, which can become an outset for the same way a
prism and appears as an
the idea of entablatures.enormous object in the ity, expose the
learning and concept
dealing with of architecture
complex clearly
matters of architecture toin general.
and life concrete surface
This project is about picturing Aarhus School of Architecture as such a basic around.
context. The Branches
schoolform ofanarchitecture is located
incline that can be covered just
with leaves and moss,its
sosurroundings!
that hut - sheltering and unifying all the diverse activities that make a good school. Just outside the
neither the sun nor the rain can penetrate therein; and now the man is lodged. and outdoors, ne
south of Godsbanen, and the additional build- creative environm
Laugier concludes that The little rustic shelter is the model upon which all the Do I understand your question, man, is it hopeless and forlorn?
ings are located along
magnificences Carl Blochs
of architecture Gade. With The entryCome
have been imagined. brings
in, sheidentity creation
said, Ill give you shelter frominto focus and
the storm
The Flex-space
It works as a gia
Frontispiece of Marc-Antoine Laugier from 1755. By
people and visito
regard
Charles Eisen (1720-1778). Allegorical engraving of the
Vitruvian primitive hut.
to the city plan, the main concept appears challenges
The essay is considered a major treatise in architectural theory. It is often
cited by teachers of architecture and practicing architects in present times.
the idea of how a school
Bob Dylan; Shelter from the storm, Blood on the Tracks 1975
of architec- the canteene, th
clear and simple. ture might form part of Aarhus skyline. The visu-
alization, which demonstrates the interplay with
The building principle and its volume help deter- Aros, is by no means without merit.
mine the schools design and organization of pro-
405 MM
e
ad
G
s
ch
lo
lB
ar
C
285 MM
Sre P-HOUSE
n Fri
chs V
ej
Site plan 1:4000 made by OP
45
#060
#22740814
Exterior perspective made by EFFEKT Arkitekter + Kristoffer Lindhart Weiss
Interior perspective made by EFFEKT Arkitekter + Kristoffer Lindhart Weiss
46
INTERIOR PERSPECTIVE: VIEW FROM A WORKSHOP HALL ADJACENT TO STUDIOS

PURCHASE DKK 25,000

NEW AARCH #060/22740814
OR PERSPECTIVE EFFEKT ARKITEKTER + KRISTOFFER LINDHART WEISS INTERIOR PE
DENMARK
school is more than a school. It is a cultural

n with an international outreach. Engaging Admisnitration / Offices
architecture, the new building must be ac-
and visible. It will invite the public in.The
Createnew school of architecture is organized in a the green wedge. The many differences in floor-
cultural events and showcasing the creative
on of students and staff through an open number
and of high-ceilinged
BA / MA Studios halls
built from wood. to-ceiling height seem a bit random; and as the
ent structure.
A total of 15 halls in different sizes and floor-to- differences are at the same time counterbalanced
ding itself is a showcase of simplicity and
ceiling heights are arranged in a relatively dense by excavations in the terrain, the overall impres-
tional facilities combined in a compact social
Special workshops / labs
campus structure - supported by pillars - around sion is rather confusing and disorderly.
es the possibilities of wood as a sustainable
able construction material relating tothree
its Nor- inner courtyard areas. The high-ceilinged
ext. Public functions
halls
A of testing, prototyping, and exploring is are ascribed a high degree of applicability in In spite of the rather chatty juxtaposition of the
o both the construction and layout of the
the use and the experience of it. general and appear light, open and with good day- halls, the jury has taken note of the versatile out-
RAW FLEXIBLE WOOD HALLS A COMPACT CAMPUS AN OPEN AND FLEXIBLE LAYOUT COURTYARDS AND T
light
ding will combine the rationality of a struc-
conditions. The movement pattern through door and indoor conditions of the facility and
system with the spatial exploration the
of the labyrinthine structure
We propose to supported
compose the school by pillars is its willingness to demonstrate isaanreversible
The typology is a compact campus The school con-
open, experiment- All halls have access t
campus and material qualities of wood. of 15 large, flexible, raw and simple rather than a singular building. It ing, exhibiting and social framework. courtyards or terraces
not described further, and the
halls constructed juryvarying
in wood, found in it rather struction
has the flow principle
and functionality of a in wood
The publicwhich
functions holds many
are organized in lively interaction betwe
simple rational shape and construction of size, daylight intake and functionality. compact building but the spatial and a central network surrounded by stu- outdoor working enviro
o has the quality of minimizing square unclear
me- how many Eachfloors
hall hasthe design
maximum envisions.daylight quality
flexibility functional
of an openand spatial possibilities.
structure. dios and workshops. The displayed
All halls expose faade can be opened
ugh double programming and provides the and allows multifunctionality. All halls connect in- and externally, the activity inside and have direct rect accessibility to ou
ry construction simplicity for low sqm costs. Back to basics! creating avisualization of one of access
flexible functional frame. the workshops
to the surroundings.leaves a study-based activities
Three blocks are indicated to be facing Carl credible impression of the constructive principle
Blochs Gade. The relatively flat structure takes and makes for a pleasant atmosphere.
up quite a lot of space on the site and thus blocks
Site plan 1:4000 made by EFFEKT Arkitekter + Kristoffer Lindhart Weiss
47
#067
Exterior perspective made by Pablo Pita Architects
Interior perspective made by Pablo Pita Architects
48
PURCHASE DKK 25,000

#067/24707263
PABLO PITA ARCHITECTS

PORTUGAL
The entrant is an example of a very straightfor- between the city and the school of architecture
ward strategic method of realizing the school of including the interaction between outside and
architecture within a pragmatic framework. The inside activities.
proposal is organized primarily in one level as
a volume consisting of four parallel pitched roof Many of the entries in the competition have an
sequences which contain distinctive elements of unrealistic approach to the task in respect to
the schools architectural programme. The build- the potential for implementation, and the jury
ing is traversed by a line running east-west which therefore wishes to commend this design for its
allows for passage in this direction. The building very straightforward and pragmatic approach to
is located parallel to the green wedge and in its the brief.
idiom appears closely related to Godsbanen.
The building has a large footprint and therefore

takes up a large part of the competition area. Fur-
thermore, the site plan is not very detailed and
only provides a scanty description of interactions
Site plan 1:4000 made by Pablo Pita Architects
49
#129
HOOL OF ARCHITECTURE #50293570
Exterior perspective made by Padilla Nicas Arquitectos
Interior perspective made by Padilla Nicas Arquitectos

INTERIOR PERSPEKTIVE
50 Rational organization of spaces ACADEMIC USES

BA PROGRAM (CLASSES+PROJECT/MEETING SPACES)
Modular structural organization of 10x10 m >> flexibility of use in the future depending on number of students
PROGRAM USES # 1 | 7 | 13
Scale of the building studied in different fronts to fit and integrate the urban and industrial context
ACADEMIC USES
Importance of natural lighting and orientation MA PROGRAM (CLASSES+PROJECT/MEETING SPACES)
Using raw materials with high durability and low maintenance PROGRAM USES # 1 | 7 | 13
Analysis of the program for an appropriate sharing of the surfaces +2 ACADEMIC USES
PURCHASE DKK 25,000

NEW AARCH #129/50293570
PADILLA NICAS ARQUITECTOS

SPAIN
ERIOR PERSPEKTIVE INTERIOR
The school of architecture is organized as a ser- The serrated structure provides several roofed Rational organ
Modular struct
rated and partially floating shed roof structure areas which are reserved for a future expansion Scale of the bu
CEPT in two to three floors facing east, located in the of the school, among other things. From a build- Importance of n
Using raw mat
southern area of the site. The structure spans the ing logistical perspective this, however, does not Analysis of the
This series of c
entire width of the area covered by tracks leaving seem particularly well considered. The entry is
behind a somewhat inarticulate space between accompanied by some evocative visualizations
the school and Godsbanen. A heavy building of which, however, indicate a level of complexity
six floors is placed along Carl Blochs Gade. The which can hardly be realized within the defined
car park faces the railway track area. budget framework.
SOUTH ELEV
The facade and sectional drawings imply a struc- The designs distinguishing feature and strength The front of the
uses spread on
tural division consisting of an underlying heavy lies on the level of the site plan and in its attempt
fundament and a light two-floor partially cantile- to combine the wide railway track area and the
vered shed-roofed 2construction which indicates green wedge 3 to the south with a close and cohe-
a range of study spaces,
rent border between the two plots is modified, keeping the south plot for the new
which to the south have sive school structure. This merits a purchase.
Communitary uses of the school are located on ground floor in relation to the existing southern NORTH ELEV
without other municipal buildings. building.
a nice
sting buildings are maintained, the southern building view
for the school of the
administrative and railway goods
The parking building is located inarea and
the most noisy areaare to
while the housing one is located in the Classrooms along with their associated uses are supported, conceptually and physically, over The large area
al staff and the northern as the Jutland Museum quietest area. the other school communitary uses, enjoying views and natural lighting in its southern orientation is guaranteed.
the north organized in double-height exhibition
rooms. The displayed designs, however, appear
somewhat schematic.
Site plan 1:4000 made by Padilla Nicas Arquitectos
51
#153
62661105 26C
22C 20C
26C
20C -2C 12C 19C
MMER COMFORT WINTER COMFORT

Exterior perspective made by Atelier CMJN
12C 19C
Connectivity Porosity
Connectivity
Connectivity Porosity Porosity
Town Town Town

Campus VIA Campus VIACampus VIA
University Theater University University Theater Theater 5C 12C
Conference Conference Conference

Connectivity Porosity Center Center Center
Urban Urban Urban
project project Sun= energy
Museums project Museums Museums
Connectivity Connectivity Town
Porosity Porosity
Campus VIA
University Theater
Town Town 5C 12C 19C Protection of
Solar Panel Laminated
Campus VIA Campus VIA Intergenerational Meeting SpaceIntergenerational Meeting Meeting
SHARING ET GROWING
Intergenerational Space Space SHARINGSHARING
ET GROWING
ET GROWING
University Theater University Theater 32C
5C 12C 19C 5Cof sound
Protection 12C 19C Protection
Interior perspective made by Atelier CMJN Theoretical Theoretical Theoretical
FE FE
INTERIOR PERSPECTIVE Conference FE
EXPO
EXPO
ED ED
EXPO
K
ED
AC
AC
BA BA
K
Center Meeting Meeting

C
CK Meeting BA
Air CK
BA
DB
DB
Space Space Space CK

28C
ED
E
BAN SOCIAL PEDAGOGICAL HEARTWARMING

FE
FE
Conference Urban Conference Natural Ventilation

FE
EXPO Sun= energy

EXPO EXPO EXPO EXPO
52 Center project Museums Center Meeting Meeting Meeting
FE FE
EXPO
Urban Urban ED ED FE
Sun= energy Sun= energy ED
CK
project project BA BA
AC
Museums Museums BA
EXPO
EXPO
BA
C
Pr
Pr
CK CK
EXPO
BA
DB
into the school by a porous The social connections with the city and the public space are The educative part is favored through showing and doing. The The sheltering strategy which enables thanks to a large struc-
Pr
CK
iseED
atic
atic
ise
ise
ED
E
atic
W FE
FE
W
FE
al
al
ctivity to the city. It has natu- largely favored. Intergenerational, sharing and meeting be- school is a structure where the various parts are built by the ture, an insulating membrane which enable toSolarregulate the
al
Connectivity Porosity Panel Laminated

wedge in the south. tween people are the core of the project. students themselves. immediate environment.
Intergenerational Meeting Space SHARING ET
SolarGROWING
Panel Laminated Solar Panel Laminated
32C
Town Meeting Space
Connectivity Intergenerational Porosity Intergenerational SHARING ET GROWING Meeting Space SHARING ET GROWING
PURCHASE DKK 25,000

A LEARNING ECO-SYSTEM #153/62661105
EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE
Learning cityATELIER
, living
CMJN school ... URBAN
FRANCE
The building is made of two structural frames: The public space is integrated into the school by a porous
The outer structure is a large steel structure that hosts the inner shelter. membrane and a strong connectivity to the city. It has natu-
Connectivity
School The structure in itself is a tribute to the industrial heritage of the site. The rally strong relationship with the wedge in the south.
of large roof becomes a photovoltaic power plant of 4300 m that generates
To
around 500 MWh; this will cover most of the school consumption. Connectiv
ar
Connectivity
The inner building is a prefabricated concrete structure. This raw environ- Campus VIA
ch
University The
ment is made
The entry has a distinctive approach totothe
be completed
urbanand modifiedThe jury by the students.
finds the entry interesting, but in rela-
itecture
NEW
Town
This organization provides flexibility and enable the school to evolve gently Campu
Campus VIA
planning issue. The overall concept
and constantly. of placing tion to the goals of the competition, it does not Unive
Aarch
A arhu
University Theate
The building design can be adapted for every kind of extension. The third
the school of architecture alongside
floor free space the
(1000m)green find
is available for the
future environmental solutions convincing. The
development.
wedge and with the additional buildings partly roof structure with its heavy cantilevered ele-
s-
The estimated area of the building is 10, 000 m. Urban

ub project Muse
P
licto
s p athe south and partly alongBudget/running
Carl Blochs gade ment dressed in transparent solar panels seems Urban
Urban
ce costs project
project
Museum
works well. All in all, this creates The mainastructure

clearaccounts
coher- for 52% misplaced
of the budget (78 Mvisually.
DKK), the tech-Furthermore, the building
nical requirements for 27% (40 M DKK), the interior for 11% and finishes
Connectivity Porosity
ence in the area. (16 M DKK) and the landscaping for appears 10% (14 M DKK) somewhat
for a total pricealien inCONNECTIVITY
of Connectivity relation to the place POROSITY Porosity Intergeneration
The project is built as a semi-open, learning eco-system. The project aims 148 M DKK. The unusually large part for the technical part is an investment Intergenerational
at more than a mere vertical/horizontal transmitting ecosystem. The quali- for photovoltaic; this will provide around and500context.
MWh per year which saves Town Town Theoretical
Theoretical
ties required for such an ecosystem are: openness to the larger environment around 1 M DKK per year. The elevated price of the structure and the tech-
The school of architecture
(urban), inclusive (social), generous and transparent (learning) in a protected is shaped as a distinct
nical requirements are compensated by the relatively price of interior fin- Campus VIA
Campus VIA
University
Theater
Theater
University
environment (shelter). Together, these conditions are favorable for learning, ished which will be in perpetual renovation and the save in electricity price
building
sharing, integrating, accepting otherness, volume
growing and favorwith an overall
future growth which is steel
the higheststructure
in Europe. The design is presented well, uncovering both Meeting Meeting
(learning eco-system). A learning ecosystem is in

dressed the condition sine qua nonmaterials.
transparent for In the case
The further budget vol-
large would be received,
its the third floor could receive
weaknesses and strengths. Nevertheless,
thriving in the uncertain, changing world of tomorrow; the new Aarhus archi- s substantial amount of extra program. Alternatively, the size of the boxes
PrPrat
Conference
atic ic
Center
ume contains
tecture school will be able to accommodate a system of closed
such an environment. couldandgrow open spaces
without hindering the public
the generous juryspace.would like to commend the entry for
al al
Urban
project Conference Museums
which might work well in some specific contexts, its clear and interesting solution - especially Center the
Urban
but the structure lacks the necessary flexibility in public space, which project has a clear connection to the
Museums
Trasparent Tr
Lars, 21, is a young architectterms of programming

student. He arrived 2 years Alonso, 29,
which the school will need project
is a Brazilian postdoctoral student Alexandra,
schools 19,
open spaces, the green
is a 1st year student. Her first Inga, 73,
Intergenerational
wedge and the is an inhabitant of Aarhus,
Trasparent
Meeting a Space
product of
ago in the old university and has seen the transition in the new who works on a new type of cellular concrete. It is being was a competition for a bridge in Indonesia. She tried the city, as she likes to say. She is retired and was a post
university. He found it a confusing at first; when the dean said used on a non-structural wall of the wood workshop. Tests to use ancestral Indonesian techniques. While she was plac- employee for most of her life. Inga likes to see her grand-
Theoretical
over time. The
they would build the school, he thought it was a rhetorical met- large assembly space will, howev-
are made in order to see how the structure evolves in various site in front of Godsbanen.
ing it on the network of the school, Jonas, a 4th year student children growing, to walk close to the harbor and above all,
aphor, as they are the architects of tomorrow. It was surprised conditions. An environmental engineer is working with him told her that what she was doing reminds him of other proj- she likes the hygge of sharing a cup of tea or going to the
Meeting
er, make
to say the least, when one of the professors abuilding
said that fine social and
to try to extroverted
minimize focal
the environmental impacts point.
and to see to ects done while he was a 1st year student. He Intergenerational
explains her Meeting
cinema with her neighbor Astrid. Precisely, a new Space
cinema has
Space
the box in which they are was the collective project for this year. what point it can be a promising material in the construction why it didnt really work. Alexandra accepts his arguments opened right by the new school of architecture. They show Workshop
Meeting
world of tomorrow. and starts to work again. There must be a way to mold her both free movies of the students building their own school,
Theoretical
idea in a new more sensible at the light of what Jonas told artistic movies done by the students or classic movies. She
Pr
atic
ise
her. Then she will send it to Jonas again likes to go there in the late afternoon. The movie of today is Worksho
W
al
macadam cowboy, a movie she has watched as a young lady

Meeting
Structure
in one of the first theaters of Aarhus. Space S
Meeting
Trasparent Rebuild School
Structure
Pr
Rebuild
ati
ise
ca
W
l
Time
Workshop
Trasparent Rebuild School
Structure Environmental
Rebuild
Time
Workshop
Structure Environmental
Site plan 1:4000 made by Atelier CMJN
53
SITE PLAN 1:2000

AARHUS RIVER
GODSBANEN
PLAZA
NEW
AARCH
RAILWAY
PLAZA
THE GREEN
WEDGE
RAILYARD
Exterior perspective made by Taller 301
SITEPLAN 1:2000
OPEN FLOO
ALL ROOMS DOW
ROOMS AT DIFFER
Interior perspective made by Taller 301

THE FACTORY FLOOR - OPEN SPACE (RAISED ROOMS)
PROGRAM
54
PURCHASE DKK 25,000 The entry makes an attractive effort to appear

transparent, subdued and rational, and it rais-
AN ARCHITECTURE SCHOOL FOR
es the question whether an architecture school
THE DESIGN/BUILD GENERATION should present itself more as factory than a
#159/65481966, design office. In this, the design is only partial-
ly successful. The two wings are unpretentious
TERIOR PERSPECTIVE INTERIO
and accompanied by credible visualizations of
n Architecture School
TALLER 301 for the the embedded workshop facilities where more
1Industrial Typology + Educational Purpose 2Th
esign/Build Generation
COLUMBIA calm functions are placed in boxes that can be
raised and lowered as needed.
major disconnects between the THE NEXT STEP IN LEARNING ARCHITECTURE INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE THREE PARALELL BANDS MOBILE
ess of designing and the act of
ing must be addressed from the
ning environment. How can we solve
dichotomy that architecture schools The chosen constructive principle seems casual
ently face?
The main concept for this entry is to loyally rep- and straightforward. The raising/lowering rooms,
chitectural production through
al manufacturing techniques are licate the two legs of Godsbanen in two new however, appear to be a doubtful solution both
mple of how architecture schools
ld resemble more factories than wings embedded in the terrain, organized mainly in became
terms of
When investigating the site, the industrial legacy
of Godsbanearealerne relevant construction and operation.
for our
gn offices. Open and flexible spaces proposal. When designed, industrial buildings
allow for a hands-on experience,
otyping, and 1:1 mockups.
to accommodate the schools MA and BA tend pro-to have a very specific purpose. A case
has never been made for an industrial typology
Architecture is
industrial revo
though for the purpose of education, research and elevators into
grammes. The space between the two embedded experimentation ofThe jury found it difficult to fully understand the
architecture. reach a potent
hile the real world profession corner.
collaborative field, the study of
tecture tends to be a secluded and wings is covered by a glass roof which serves as sectional
Our proposal wishes to leave no room for
subjective appreciations. The industrial look drawings
and roof profiles. Is it a shed roof Manufacturing
feel of the school (raw and robust structure), in its implementatio
some activity. If the design process
en to the public it should be able to the schools public high-ceilinged street space. or a pitched roof? However, this does not deprive
flexible, honest and transparent configuration does
not attempt to compete with the thing that actually
demonstrated
mechanical tec
erate a heightened consciousness of matters: the production of knowledge and the the boundaries
profession and its role in society. Here, the railway tracks are preserved and plant- the entry of a certain vitality and drive which the
exaltation of the craft. Since architec
perhaps thats
Like most industrial buildings, it allows for
he Godsbanearealerne seems the ed over. The entry operates with two focus maximum flexibilityjury
areas: wishes
and a prolonged life-cycle. to commend and award by purchas- By incorporatin
There are things that cannot be taught properly In standard educational environments, architecture The new Aarhus School of Architecture is
place for these ideas to come to in an academic environment, for instance students are often restricted to the design stages composed of three parallel bands: two lateral
Aarhus Schoo
on. Located at the heart of Aarhus,
ndustrial heritage partnered with
making
construction. The mere visible
fact that a buildingthe
takes a minimum of 2 years to build make this
usually workshop facilities
of a project. The proposal provides the means
for learning about everything that a typical
and intro- ing the entry.
The constant display of work done by students
could actually help engage the city and other
industrial ships each containing the BA and MA
programmes, and a central green public forum.
taking a step in
by the design
disciplines interested in taking the design and possibilities an
task almost impossible. It is an essential aspect studio couldnt offer before; it is hands-on, fully The bands come together involving nature, the
Green Wedge initiative enable the
tion of a large greenhouse open to
ducing
of our theexperience
craft to get a hands-on public to the
with the building.
collaborative, with projects that students could see
construction technology a step further. The
environment here is a means to an end, not the
built
city, knowledge and experimentation, engaging
physical materiality of architecture and not just 2D through to being a finished product. through multiple movements and activities.
public year round. end itself.
drawings and renderings.
AARHUS
AARHUS RIVER MUSIC HALL
GODSBANEN
PLAZA
SCANDINAVIAN
CONGRESS CENTER
NEW
AARCH
RAILWAY
PLAZA
Site plan 1:4000 made by Taller 301
THE GREEN
WEDGE
55
RAILYARD
Imagine a new School of architecture as a framework for engaging architectural experimen- The hierarchical structure and layout also supports an overall principle of design for disas-
tation, education and research in dialog with the surrounding community. An inclusive space sembly, making it easy to upgrade and recycle technical installations, and for the users of the
inspired by the notion of: architecture as a social intervention. We propose a structure that module
building the clear principles and transparency of the building services will become part of the
offers an agile framework to accommodate the ever-changing conditions for architectural learning and exploration of the integration of architectural principles and building services.
practice and experiment. A exible structure that is open and invites the community to ob- The raw and honest concrete structure offers large open spans and ultimate exibility in both
serve, interact and participate in the experiments that concern us all. A transparent school that spatial conguration and sizes. In designing the structure, daylight conditions have been a
engages dialog through the exploration of Architecture on every level. core core
main design parameter; high ceilings have been prioritized to ensure that daylight will ow
AARHUS SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE | THE DANISH BUILDING & PROPERTY AGENCY
In short, we envision a new School of Architecture as an open architectural prototype that is
| NEW AARCH JURY REPORT deep into the structure, creating a light and exible workshop environment. When developing
the structure, we view daylight as an important resource, an important indoor climate factor as
able to evolve and change over time, formed by the architects of tomorrow and the surround- well as the strongest provider of different intensities of atmosphere.
ing community. core core
The raw structure is affect from both the inside by architectural student for example making The structural logic of this framework is applied throughout the site. Because of its super-exi- LANDSCAPE / the urban landscape of Godsbanen d
1:1 faade mockups incorporated in the faade system and from the outside by people in the bility, it can be adjusted to any program and use. In this way, the school will not only be part of
community making gardens and structures in the surrounding landscape. the city it will be a city part, taking the parameters of the city as its foundation. An agile and
dynamic city part for the community to ow through and engage with.
The structure could be viewed as a black and white drawing just waiting to be lled in with
colors over and over. The proposal at hand is just one version of coloring the structure,
the school will take on many forms and continue to evolve over time. The spatial organization The Generic structure is contextualize through four levels of engagement.
STRUCTURAL CONCEPT / plan showing the simple building module, cores and owlines
proposed here should be viewed merely as a point of departure.
LANDSCAPE
STRUCTURAL CONCEPT The new school situated right where the urban landscape of Godsbanen dissolves into the
The structural framework consists of a basic column and slab system, composed of vertical core core green wedge. In this manor, the school forms a hinge between the city and the raw nature of
concrete columns directly supporting horizontally spanning TT slabs. Function-cores create the postindustrial landscape. The two landscapes runs through the structure and becomes
daylight height x 2.5
structural and infrastructural anchor points containing stairs, elevators, and toilets, as well in-closed part of the school creating various potentials for engaging/interacting with the public domain. PLACE / anchor points constitute spaces with a spec
as the primary location and distribution of building services. The cores connect the essential functions The Concept of interwoven spaces encourages the public to access the structure and the
building parts and form a logical foundation for the use of the building. The main ow spaces school activities to, uidly grow into the public domain.
are situated on each side of the cores to accommodate the main infrastructure through the semi open
structure. functions
PLACE
Points of specicity provides anchor points marking specic places within the structure and
open
Through the careful integration of all the passive features created by the architectural solu- surrounding landscape. The anchor points constitute spaces with a specic function or spatial
functions
tions (thermal mass, insulation, excellent daylighting conditions, passive shading of surplus character that will work as a type of lighthouses through the structure and insure that the
solar radiation and excellent conditions for natural ventilation airow) the need for building structure will operate in a state of poise even while undergoing constant transformation. Work-
services has been reduced to a minimum. This approach also allows for more experimental technical less technical shops, auditoriums, Archi Tegn, integrated exterior green spaces and pavilions are examples
learning in the buildings themselves making it possible to create and experience free-oat- demanding demanding
of points of specicity. These types of spaces provides a huge quality in creating a sense of
ing zones, where variations in indoor climate and lighting can be combined and users encour- zone zone
place in the existing school, this sense of place is even more important when creating a new
aged to move to different zones with different options according to individual needs, tasks, STRUCTURAL CONCEPT / section showing the simple building module, cores, owlines, school of architecture. SPACE / spatial heterogeneity ranging from large inte
activity level and clothing. functions and how daylight has been a main design parameter
spaces
1. new aarch
2. new aarch add-ons
3. parking house
4. the jutland art academy
5. brnekulturhuset
6. ungdomskulturhuset
7. the architecture project
8. youth club
9. art shops
10. cafees
11. ofce hotel
12. galleries
13. foodhall
14. kaospiloterne
15. alternative stage
16. byhjskolen
17. outdoor / urban kitchen gardens
18. outdoor / square
19. outdoor / skate park
20. outdoor / urban grass eld
area on land register number 2202b

20.000m2 land use ratio 100%
area on land register number 845q

23.000m2 land use ratio 175% 11 14
19
18
12 10
13 9
4 5
6
7 1
16
3
17 2202b
15
2
ADD ON
20 2
845q
URBAN GRASS FIELD
...in this way, the school will not only be

Exterior perspective made by AART architects part of the city it will be a city part...
A
SITEPLAN 1:2000
...the inhabitants of the structure: students,

teachers and the neighboring communities
will be the real architects of the new
School of Architecture...
GROUNDFLOOR 1:500
SECTION AA 1:500
Conceptual visualisation made by AART architects
56
FLOW / ORGANISATION SECTION BB 1:500

PURCHASE DKK 25,000

ENGAGING FLOWS #187/75651600
...a black and white drawing just
AART ARCHITECTS waiting to be lled in with colors...
DENMARK
PERSPEKTIVE INTERIOR PERSP
School of architecture as a framework for engaging architectural experimen- The hierarchical structure and layout also supports an overall principle of design for disas-
and research in dialog with the surrounding community. An inclusive space sembly, making it easy to upgrade and recycle technical installations, and for the users of the
notion of: architecture as a social intervention. We propose a structure that module
building the clear principles and transparency of the building services will become part of the
The entry applies a uniform strategy to the entire
ramework to accommodate the ever-changing conditions for architectural
periment. A exible structure that is open and invites the community to ob-
learning and exploration of the integration of architectural principles and building services.
The raw and honest concrete structure offers large open spans and ultimate exibility in both
nd participate in the experiments that concern us all. A transparent school that spatial conguration and sizes. In designing the structure, daylight conditions have been a
area: a constructive regular grid with
hrough the exploration of Architecture on every level. core pillars and core
main design parameter; high ceilings have been prioritized to ensure that daylight will ow
deep into the structure, creating a light and exible workshop environment. When developing
horizontal
sion a new School of Architecture as an open architectural prototype varying
that is
nd change over time, formed by the architects of tomorrow and the surround-
floors in different dimensions. the structure, we view daylight as an important resource, an important indoor climate factor as
well as the strongest provider of different intensities of atmosphere.
This structural approach to the development
e is affect from both the inside by architectural student for example making
core
of core The structural logic of this framework is applied throughout the site. Because of its super-exi- LANDSCAPE / the ur
ups incorporated in the faade system and from the outside by people in the bility, it can be adjusted to any program and use. In this way, the school will not only be part of
the
ng gardens and structures in the surrounding landscape. area is meant to contribute to the creation the city it will be a city part, taking the parameters of the city as its foundation. An agile and
dynamic city part for the community to ow through and engage with.
uld be viewed as a black and white drawing just ofwaiting
a recurring
to be lled in with hierarchical system with rooms in
d over. The proposal at hand is just one version of coloring the structure,
hould be viewed merely as a point of departure.different scales. The entry appears abstract and
ke on many forms and continue to evolve over time. The spatial organization The Generic structure is contextualize through four levels of engagement.
STRUCTURAL CONCEPT / plan showing the simple building module, cores and owlines
LANDSCAPE
CONCEPT only offers scarce information on the final archi- The new school situated right where the urban landscape of Godsbanen dissolves into the
amework consists of a basic column and slab system, composed of vertical core core green wedge. In this manor, the school forms a hinge between the city and the raw nature of
s directly supporting horizontally spanning TT tectonic gestalt.
slabs. Function-cores create Nevertheless, the illustrations, the postindustrial landscape. The two landscapes runs through the structure and becomes
daylight height x 2.5
frastructural anchor points containing stairs, elevators, and toilets, as well in-closed part of the school creating various potentials for engaging/interacting with the public domain. PLACE / anchor point
cation and distribution of building services. The cores connect the essential functions
along
d form a logical foundation for the use of the building. with
The main ow spacesthe model, indicate the beginnings The Concept of interwoven spaces encourages the public to access the structure and the
school activities to, uidly grow into the public domain.
each side of the cores to accommodate the main infrastructure through the semi open
of an architectonic interplay that might devel- functions
PLACE
Points of specicity provides anchor points marking specic places within the structure and
open
op into an interesting element of a future urban
eful integration of all the passive features created by the architectural solu-
ass, insulation, excellent daylighting conditions, passive shading of surplus
functions
surrounding landscape. The anchor points constitute spaces with a specic function or spatial
character that will work as a type of lighthouses through the structure and insure that the
nd excellent conditions for natural ventilation airow) the need for building structure will operate in a state of poise even while undergoing constant transformation. Work-
landscape.
en reduced to a minimum. This approach also allows for more experimental The proposal technicalappears
less technical incomplete and shops, auditoriums, Archi Tegn, integrated exterior green spaces and pavilions are examples
uildings themselves making it possible to create and experience free-oat- demanding demanding
of points of specicity. These types of spaces provides a huge quality in creating a sense of
e variations in indoor climate and lighting can benave
combined andbut at theSTRUCTURAL
users encour- same zone
time zone
it has definite po- place in the existing school, this sense of place is even more important when creating a new
different zones with different options according to individual needs, tasks, CONCEPT / section showing the simple building module, cores, owlines, school of architecture. SPACE / spatial heter
clothing.
tential. Although less important, the jury would
functions and how daylight has been a main design parameter
spaces
furthermore like to praise the proposers models

and presentation technique.
new aarch
new aarch add-ons
parking house
the jutland art academy
brnekulturhuset
ungdomskulturhuset
the architecture project
youth club
art shops
cafees
ofce hotel
galleries
foodhall
kaospiloterne
alternative stage
byhjskolen
outdoor / urban kitchen gardens
outdoor / square
outdoor / skate park
outdoor / urban grass eld
and register number 2202b

2 land use ratio 100%
and register number 845q

2 land use ratio 175% 11 14
19
18
12 10
13 9
4 5
6
7 1
16
3
17 2202b
15
20 2
845q
Site plan 1:4000 made by AART architects
57
URBAN GRASS FIELD
...in this way, the school will not only be

URBAN PLAZA/GATHERING SPACE
IN-DEPTH
STUDYING
POND POND
LIBRARY
2
POND
LECTURE
4 LEGEND:
1. Meeting room
2. Librarian workspace
PROF. MEDIA ARCHI-TEGN
5/KITCHEN 3.Office
4. Light wells/ gardens
6 5. Toilet/tea-kitchen/storage
6. Stair to basement
4
TOWER ABOVE:
CASUAL 5 BA+MA programmes
HANG-OUT PHD environment
PRINT-SHOP Academic staff
Various meeting and gathering
4 spaces
CANTEEN/CIVIC KITCHEN
INTERNSHIP 5
5 CENTRE
4
4
4 5
4 EVENT/ GATHERING SPACE INT. /
5
EXCHANGE
CASUAL
HANG-OUT CASUAL 4
GALLERY/EXHIBITION SPACE WORKSPACE
3
5
1
4 3
4
4
CASUAL PROJECT/ ADMIN
PIN-UP SPACE
Bike parking 1
ARTIST IN RESIDENCE/
ACCOMONDATION 5
4
5
4
1
M-LAB
LECTURE
URBAN GARDENS GARDEN PLAZA/ GATHERING

LECTURE
WORKSHOPS/LABS
EXTERNAL
WORKSH.
4
SIT
EB
OU
ND
AR
Y
Exterior perspective made by MATTERS

GROUNDFLOOR 1:500
SECTION/FACADE 1:500
SECTION/FACADE 1:500
Facade and section 1:1000 made by MATTERS
58
PURCHASE DKK 25,000

COLLABORATIVE INCUBATOR #189/75792043
MATTERS
DENMARK
CTIVE This design, as one of only few in the compe- The structure in the centre of the complex - in the INTERIOR PERSPECTIVE
tition, is located towards the track areas in the entire design actually is depicted in a somewhat
east, organising the school of architecture as a clinical and cold manner. At first, the jury was
low elongated building complex which, in the slightly puzzled by the BA and MA programmes
manner of a railway junction accommodates the being located in the tower building, but, at sec-
movement from the south, and places the school ond thought, it might be precisely this cheeky
at the transition between the city and the green touch: turning the hot silo of conversation and
wedge. Employing soft landscape movements a discussion into the very tone of the school of ar-
complex is depicted with utilizable roof surfaces chitecture - which, along with the complexs dis-
which culminate in a centrally placed tower-like tinct role as a marker of the crossing between the
building in the centre. landscape-related wedge and the urban space,
seduced the jury to recommend a purchase.
As one of only few entries, the entry suggests
a site plan which creates a significant place be- Moreover, the entry has given rise to an inter-
tween the school and Godsbanen. Opposite to esting debate concerning the division of zones,
the track area
SHAPING THE a ribbon development is shown
BUILDING URBAN PUBLIC safety
PLACES and the balance between the public and
THE FOUNDATION
is specific site is the creative hub Gods- By picking up on the movement of the railway tracks and By lifting the footprint we are creating surrounding pla- Internally the podium operates as a big flexible foundation
ed new green belt and the railway lines facing aknowledging
Carl Blochs Vej.of This
the direction development
Godsbanen, we are linking encir-
ces to meet.the private.
A green lush garden facing south - towards for the architecture education - housing all public activiti-
he south-eastern edge. the building to the context. Godsbanen an urban plaza that links to the proximity to es + administration + workshops, exhibition, civic kitchen,
cles a west-oriented landscape space that sup- the city, towards North-west a park. The building conne- library etc. Connectivity between the green belt and
cts both visually and physically to these spaces and the Godsbanen as a continous space is still strong. The space
ports the flat symmetric shape. boundaries
blurred.
between building and landscape becomes is a flexible hub of buzzing activity.
Godsbanen
Resi- Arch.
Urban
dential project
Plaza
Parking AARCH
Garden
Plaza
Student
housing
Residential
Office/
commercial
Production
Collage
Residential
Parking
Site plan 1:4000 made by MATTERS

Community
house
Event Arena
59
ENT AA
#229
96685212
or the specific architectural elements the The iconic objects together with the open and flexible space create a lively and creative urban living room,
nd expressive design of the iconic objects. where students, visitor and passers-by meet, debate, collaborate, observe and experiment
The horizontal elements the urban ground floor and the elevated studios - serve as the flexible frame for the specific architectural elements
Exterior perspective made by JAJA Architects iconic objects. The flexibility and minimalism of the horizontal elements is contrasted with the specific and expressive design of the iconic ob
activities to spill out into the green wedge. The structure and finishing of the elevated studio box gives a calm background
upports the vision for Aarhus K. to the messy and creative atmosphere of the different studios.
urban street connecting the new WORKSHOP TARPAULIN BUILDING THE BOOK TOWER
est and a plaza around the Double The workshop building is a flexible, Architegn and the print shop is located The information center is a big wooden
scaffolding-like steel frame wrapped in the Tarpaulin building. The historical shelf system housing the material, book
with a textile membrane. The modular wooden house gives the new School and digital media collection.
system can be adapted, changed and building the charm and atmosphere as
extended by the students, thus becoming we know it from Nrreport.
the iconic objects. The volumetric a constantly transforming structure
the new urban living room. The flexi- used for 1:1 mock-ups, experiments and
ch object contains a specific function manifestations.
g, penetrating the elevated studios
nt transition between inside and out-

ts and visitors, including prototype
d industrial athmosphere.
THE CANTINA THE AUDITORIUM THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
nd master program. The 7m high The cantina is placed in the original The stage is formed as a two-sided The administration and offices are
ne deck allows for many different customs warehouse. The building is cut to auditorium with seating in each end of grouped in a vertical tower creating a
ending on the studios teaching allow the seating to move into the open the stage. The glass building is wrapped visual landmark for the new school. The
ab with green houses, urban farming space. The cut reveals the layers of the in layers of curtains to give different towers formal content is represented
building structure and cladding and the- levels of opacity depending on the with the Mies inspired faade.
reby gives insights into former building activity inside.
traditions.
re, form, materiality, circulation
Their different identity, character and
and the flexible, the minimalistic and
Conceptual diagram made by JAJA Architects
60
There is a fluent transition between inside and outside allowing the schools activities to spill out into the green w
The schools prominent location on Godsbanearealets main urban element supports the vision for Aarhus K.
PURCHASE DKK 25,000

EXPERIMENT AA #229/96685212
There is a fluent transition between inside and outside allowing the schools activities to spill out into the green wedge.
JAJA ARCHITECTS The schools prominent location on Godsbanearealets main urban element supports the vision for Aarhus K.
DENMARK
study architecture is to study the actual buildings. It is the first-hand experience and experiments of materials, scale, prominent appearance towards south-east is contrasted by the other three faade conditions. The urban street connecting the new
ectonics and the way it performs and ages when encountering time, usage and the natural elements that inspires neighbourhood to Aarhus centre on the south-west, the local neighbourhood street on the north-west and a plaza around the Double
ers lasting impressions throughout ones architectural studies. Rainbow Kakaobar building on the north-east.
ture school should be designed as a hands-onThe entry

exploration is characterised
of what architecture by of aa
can be. Instead of the limitations straightfor-
THE ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT building that was deemed worthy of preservation
new architecture school should induce curiosity, cultivate critical thinking and inspire students to experiment. The new school consists of three main elements; The urban living room, the elevated studios and the iconic objects. The volumetric
ward overall plan in terms of urbanconcept planning. and
is to elevate the studios inupclearly
to free shaping
the ground floor singular
allowing the surroundings to flow pavilions with
into the new urban living room.aThe flexi-
ilding that combines a flexible framework with a series of highly specific architectural elements in which the students bility of the ground-floor and the studios is contrasted with the specificity of the iconic objects. Each object contains a specific function
The school of architecture has
nd experiment with spatial compositions. In other words, we propose a building where students study architecture by a simple exterior strong identity located within the overall general
and has therefore its own character and identity. The six objects are spread throughout the building, penetrating the elevated studios
ture and moving through series of different architectural elements, which they can challenge and transform as part of and creating visual and physical connection between the floors.
earch and experiments.
shape, located to the west of the green wedge, building project.
and is surrounded by the remaining buildings The urban living roomin takes its identity from the industrial site and its cultural surrounding. A fluent transition between inside and out-
idea is, there is no right nor wrong. The architecture education should rather inspire and unfold the countless possi- side, flexible furniture and spaces and an open canteen allow for various activities for both students and visitors, including prototype
the other directions. The proposed outdoor areasopen critiques,
the vision we seek to manifest in a physical building. Rather than a streamlined architectural piece, the new architec- building, exhibitions, The lectures,
entry distinguishes
debates and performances and create itself
a creativeby acknowledg-
and industrial athmosphere.
hus consist of numerous spatial-, material- and structural solutions and will become like 1:1 architectural catalogue
ything from spatial conditions to architecturaldo, however,
components not
such as facades, appear
windows, very
walls, ceilings, programmed.
stairs, walls, The elevated studios serve as ing the
the roof of thefact that
urban living room andanare architecture school
the home of the bachelor and willTheal-
master program. 7m high
volume is one big flexible box. The flexible structure and the possibility of implementing a mezzanine deck allows for many different
ways
studio layouts and for each studio betheirinowncontinual
to define development
way of inhabiting and and
organizing space, depending on thechange,
studios teaching
pirit of the current faculty, our ambition for the new architecture school is to create a 1:1 laboratory where first-hand culture and study focus. The roof of the elevated studio box is a peaceful landscape retreat and a lab with green houses, urban farming
The
xperimentation for the students is the foundation anddesign appears
where the objective abstract
is to inspire generations of in relation
future tothethe
architects for schoolcon- butspecies
canteen and local that it isGodsbanearealernes
to strengthen also fundamental biodiversity. to establish a
hitectural understanding and have a critical approach to the professions role and impact in our society and physical
text and distanced in terms of the programming The iconic objects each havenumber
their own purpose. ofThispermanent andsize,fistructure,
results in six objects of variying xed points with-
form, materiality, circulation
hence six different architectural expressions. The objects are the visual highlights of the building. Their different identity, character and
N
of the solution whichappears less strong and not in a fl exible structure.
symbolism add friction and spatial variation to the architecture.
Therefore it is important
f the school seeks to create a wide variation of quite ready
urban conditions aroundfor development.
the building, creating an urban spaceNevertheless,
catalog the to establish in the architecture a relationship
e building is placed along the green wedge giving the scho ol maximum exposure to the Godsbanearealernes main ur- Together the three elements create a building that lives through its contrast between the specific and the flexible, the minimalistic and
jury and
to create interaction between the schools activities would
the naturallike to commend
and historical qualities of the site.the entry for its abil- between areas with a strong identity and are-
The buildings
ity to develop an inspiring relation between the as with an open and changeable nature. In this
temporary and the permanent aspects of the ar- way the entry makes a significant contribution to
chitecture - both in relation to using the existing the competition.
Site plan 1:4000 made by JAJA Architects
61
OUTRO
Assessment meeting
THE NEXT STAGE
This open design competition is just one stage development of the area together with Aarhus
in the process leading to a new school. Prior to Municipality. Aarhus Municipality has contribut-
launching the open design competition, three ed to the assessment process with great commit-
consortia were prequalified for the next phase: ment; and it is the hope of the commissioner of
the project competition. In this phase the three the competition that we can continue this fruitful
prequalified teams and the three winners of the cooperation towards a unified and well-thought-
open design competition will be competing to out master plan for the area.
design the final building project, based on an
architectural programme prepared on the basis In parallel with this dialogue, a process involving
of the results from the open design competition the schools management, user groups, exter-
and a user involvement process carried out in the nal stakeholders etc. will set these stakeholders
period between the two competitions. the task of analysing the winning and awarded
entries and translate them into requirements
The open design competition has generated many and recommendations for the final building
ideas and input that have given us more knowl- project. The results of the open design compe-
edge about the future direction of the project. The tition should, in other words, be seen as a rich
open design competition has been an invaluable, catalogue which the users can now access, learn
enlightening and inspiring process which has more from and challenge. The process will be fa-
prepared us to set out the right framework for the cilitated by NORD Architects and, of course, The
project on a more informed basis than before. The Danish Building & Property Agency, who has the
results of the open design competition should not overall responsibility for the project.
be confused with the actual project. At this stage
what is essential is the ideas and visions that will The open design competition has been a singu-
provide a basis for and contribute to the further larly exciting step on the road towards a new
process towards the final objective. Ideas and vi- school, and the jury are beginning to be able to
sions that can be transplanted to a project com- imagine the eventual shape of the school. Good
petition and eventually to the final project - as the architecture emerges from a dialogue with the
supporting foundation of the project, if you like. people who are looking forward to something.
And the jury looks forward to the coming pro-
The first step of the further process is to deter- cess. We expect the new school of architecture to
mine the location of the school and the further be a very special place in Aarhus.
PRE QUALI-
FICATION SANAA BIG LACATON
& VASSAL
FALL 2015
RESTRICTED
DESIGN FINAL
COMPETITION
2016/17 PROJECT
OPEN DESIGN VARGO ATELIER
COMPETITION ERIK GIUDICE NIELSEN & LORENTZEN
ARCHITECTS PALLE LANGKILDE
SPRING 2016
63
THANKS TO ALL THE PARTICIPANTS IN THE OPEN DESIGN COMPETITION
4SITE ARCHITECTS / 8486 ARCHITEKCI / ACHA ZABALLA ARQUITECTOS / ADEPT / AGENDA /

A. A. GARCA / A. SHINOLOV/ A. VAVUSHKA/ ALEX POULSEN ARKITEKTER / A.W. CHUI-KWAN
& K. NAGANO / A.V. LAUTRUP/ A. AAKJR / A.KARIMKHAN / A. VARVIN / ANDREW STOANE
ARCHITECT / A. ISKALA / ARCH_IT + PIOTR ZYBURA / ARCHITENSIONS / AREAL ARKITEKTER /
A. KARVAT / A. HVAS / ATAT / ATELIER CMJN / ATELIER LORENTZEN LANGKILDE / A. ASLAN, B.
ARIN, H.A. ERKAN & Z. OKURSOY / B. BOOZ & M. KITALA / BCVA / B. A. ODDGAARD / BLANK-
PAGE ARCHITECTS / BMA ARCHITECTURE / BOGLE ARCHITECTS / BOYARSKY MURPHY ARCHI-
TECTS / BRADY MALLALIEU ARCHITECTS / B.C.F. LEE / B.VARGO, J. NIELSEN & M. PALLE / C+
ARCHITECTS / C. M. PAZOS / C. MORAN, B.W. AHEARN & C. DAHL / CARL TURNER ARCHITECTS /
C.S. RIBEIRO, L.A. SOARES & P.S. SOUSA / C. MAURICIO & G. HENRQUEZ / CEBRA ARCHITECTURE /
CHEUNGVOGL ARCHITECTS / C.Y. CHAN & S.M.TAN/ C. KOUSGAARD / C. TVERSTED / COFFEY
ARCHITECTS / COLORCLOUDSTUDIO / D. ZERBI / D. RICCARDO / D.T. HOOPE & D. CHAN / D.C.
MARCHN / D. TANASA / DECODE URBANISM OFFICE / DEGLI ESPOSTI ARCHITETTI / DIGITAL-
AB / DIID ARCHITECTES / DIMITRIOS ZOUPAS | ZOUPAS ARCHITECTS / D.M. DORDEA & I.M.
IONESCU / DV2C2 / EFFEKT ARKITEKTER + K.L. WEISS / ELA / E. LAOUTARIS & K.E. KALOMOIRI /
ERIK GIUDICE ARCHITECTS / ESTUDIO TORRES NADAL / F3AA ARCHITECTS / F8 ARCHITECTURE /
FABretect / F. FOONDUN, J. KIM & C. MESNARD / F. MOSCHETTI / F. ENNAS / F.G. PRADA / FORA /
F. LNOW, E. ROJO & M. SANCHEZ / F. NAGASHIMA / FNDC / GLVEZ + WIECZOREK ARCHI-
TECTURE / GARY MARINKO ARCHITECTS / GiGA / GOLZARI-NG ARCHITECTS / G.C. MEDINA &
M.G. RODRIGUEZ / G. NICHOLLS / GUSTAV APPELL ARKITEKTKONTOR / HADJ KACEM & BELKH-
IRIA ARCHITECTURE / H. TAN & Z. GU / HEIKKINEN-KOMONEN ARCHITECTS / HENEGHAN PENG
ARCHITECTS / H. FRICH / HESSELBRAND / HOLSCHER NORDBERG ARKITEKTER / HOUT ARCHI-
TECTURE / H.M. BAEZA, M.B. BENTZEN & M. COSTAN / IAN RITCHIE ARCHITECTS / I. TITOV / I.
B. GIMENO / I.KARRAS + PLUSR CHITECTURE / J.M. RIVERA & A.D. JEREZ / JAJA ARCHITECTS /
J.F. HOLMQVIST-LARSEN / J. AASE & K. WIIK / J. PEDERSEN / J.R. SNCHEZ / J.. CHECA & A.O.
CAMACHO / J.S. MORENO / J.T. BACHMAN & K. STRANIX / JUHYUNKIM ARCHITECTURE / J.R.
GORMSEN & J.. KALLEHAVE / JUSIN & PARK / JWH ARCHITECTS + VESTHARDT ARCHITECTS /
KAMPEN ARKITEKTER / K. KITAHARA / K. TAKADA, M. NISHIZATO & Y. YAGIHAV / K.A. PAYERO /
K.THORSELL & P. RASMUSSEN / KITOKO STUDIO / KOIS ASSOCIATED ARCHITECTS + STELIOS KOIS /
64
K. BRANDSEN / KSESTUDIO / KUROKAWA ARCHITECT / LAB-B / LAHDELMA & MAHL-

AMKI ARCHITECTS / LAP / LENSCHOW & PIHLMANN / LIMBROCK TUBBESING ARCHI-
TECTURE AND URBAN PLANNING / LINE SOLGAARD ARKITEKTER / LINK ARCHITECTURE /
LIOR SEGAL / LOOP ARCHITECTS + TEMBO ARCHITECTS + ASLA ARCHITECTS / LORCAN OHERLI-
HY ARCHITECTS / LOT-EK / L.B. GMEZ / LYCS ARCHITECTURE / MADe / MALE ARCHITEKTEN /
MANIPULAZIONE INTERNAZIONALE / M. LO MAURO / M. J. THORUP & T. SKOV-CARLSEN / MAR-
TINS ARCHITECTURE OFFICE + BRANDO COSTA LIMA / MAS / M.P. LAXALDE / M. MASTALSKI,
O. STORJOHANN & I. TSIOMA / MATTERS / M. HASAN / M. NTOURAKOS / M. NAUJALYTE & A.
SADZEVICIUS / MONGE + SALCEDO ARCHITECTS / MORPH ESTUDIO / MUTOPIA / NAN ARCHI-
TECTS / NATHAN ROMERO ARKITEKTER + COAM & BAUEN / NEXO ARQUITECTURA / N. LEBEER
& R. ANAITYTE / NIKKEN SEKKEI / NO.MAD ARQUITECTOS / NOBEL ARKITEKTER / N.M. PEDRO-
SA / O. KOROTKYKH & M. KRAMAR/ OOZE ARCHITECTS / OP / O. STAV & T. RIGLER / OYO / P.C.
ELIZONDO / PABLO PITA ARCHITECTS / P. ROQUERO / PADILLA NICAS ARQUITECTOS / PALAZON
STUDIO / P. VENTURELLA & C. SCOTUCCI / PAUL PREISSNER ARCHITECTS / P.S. CARVALHO /
P. VAPAAVUORI / PETRS ARCHITECTURE / P.T. HOANG & K.T. VANH & T.N. XUAN & V.T. TIEN &
H.D. ANH / P. DI MATTEO / P. NIKOLAI / POTHOLES / P.T. SUGMAR / R.J. FERMIN / R.E. BECK, M.L.
KLOGBORG & S.M. KRISTENSEN / S. BECCHIO & P. BORGHINO / S. MARILA / SEBASTIAN IRAR-
RZAVAL ARQUITECTOS / S. HENRY-FRESNEAU / SIMMETRIA ARCHITECTURAL BUREAU / SLETH /
SMAR ARCHITECTURE STUDIO / SOGO AUD / SPANT STUDIO / SPOL ARCHITECTS / SRFAC / S.M.
TEETERS / STUDIO 201, ZU XINGHUA / STUDIO CHRISTIAN WASSMANN / STUDIO DEBRIS / STU-
DIO MAPAA / STUDIO ZA ARHITEKTURU + I. FRANIC / S. NABEEL / SUPERPOOL / S. LINDVALL &
L. NEGRINI / SV60 CORDN + LIN ARQUITECTOS / S. GRIFFEL / SVET VMES / S.H. HANSEN, I.F.
PEDERSEN, J. BRNDSTED & A. ROLVUNG / S.K. AAGAARD / T. PONTE / T. RAHMEH & H. MATAR /
TALLER 301 / TEKTURA / TERROIR / T. RUDNICKI & N.K. JENSEN / T. OBRIEN, S. RUBIN & R.L.
TOFTDAHL / T.A. SEMAAN, J. CHALHOUB, R. GHANNAM, R. HOBEIQA & E.A. MRAD / T. RIGG /
T.W. CHUN / TYRO / ULARGUI Y ASOCIADOS / URBAN OFFICE ARCHITECTURE / UUFIE / VIAR ES-
TUDIO ARQUITECTURA / WAI ARCHITECTURE THINK TANK / W. PENG / WHITE ARKITEKTER / WIL-
LIAM MATTHEWS ASSOCIATES / XDGA XAVEER DE GEYTER ARCHITECTS / X-PO ARKITEKTERNE +
P. HANSEN / Y.T. CHAN / YAN LI / Y. WELL / AART ARCHITECTS / AAU ANASTAS
65
SIGNED BY THE JURY
Kristian Lyk-Jensen Lars Autrup
Signe Primdal Kregaard Jens Thomas Arnfred
Ingelise Bogason Reiulf Ramstad
Torben Nielsen Lisa Srensen
66
COLOPHON
The jurys report was drawn up by The Danish

Building & Property Agency in cooperation with
Jury Member Torben Nielsen and Design pro-
fessionals Jens Arnfred and Reiulf Ramstad in
coordination with Danish Architects Association.
Layout: OddFischlein
Online edition: www.newaarch.dk

(prepared by 1508)
Publication date: 4 April 2016

New Aarch Jury Report

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

New Aarch Jury Report

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

JURY REPORT

WINNERS & PURCHASES

A RAW AND ROBUST STRUCTURE THAT IS

The 230 entries we received helped the jury clar-

Australia / 4 Hong Kong / 4 Saudi Arabia / 1

THREE EQUAL FIRST PRIZES PURCHASES

#101/37641897 #156/64130476 #220/92070479

#011/03641494 #014/04344322 #037/12282623

#051/19127100 #060/22740814 #067/24707263

#129/50293570 #153/62661105 #159/65481966

#187/75651600 #189/75792043 #229/96685212

The open design competition is funded by Aar- ENTRIES

SECRETARY TO THE JURY AND PROJECT COORDINATOR #099/36977494; #101/37641897; #105/39257234;

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA At the first meeting the design professionals pre-

THE RESULT TOTAL PRIZE MONEY

Entry #038/12812859 made by Aleksandar Shinolov, Site plan 1:4000

THE OUTDOOR AREAS CONSTITUTE A VALUABLE POTENTIAL.

Entry #178/72328279 made by Bjrn Alstrup Oddgaard, Site plan 1:4000

Parking for cars

Entry #188/75757760 made by Kristian Brandsen, Plan 1:1000

Work spaces for

PROBS 0 FLOOR FLOW

Outdoor areas for teaching Exhibition area

Container greenhouse Container bar

Entry #109/40561383 Entry #008/02835578 Entry #035/11676579

Entry #098/36821108 Entry #219/91280800 Entry #095/35890638

Entry #028/09045791 Entry #210/87428972 Entry #195/79791362

SPATIAL FEATURES CONCLUSION

PECTIVE INTERIOR PERSPECT

a, max 39-43.000m2 10) New Mixed Use, Shopping and Residential

The New School of Architecture,

USE 1: three year Ba Programme- 335

USE 5: special workshops labs

Exitsting Railway Tracks

NEW AARCH FOOTPRINT = 7045 m2

potentials of Godsbanearealerne the green

Entry #073/28727413 made by DV2C2,

ONE OF THREE EQUAL FIRST PRIZES OF DKK 200,000

ERIK GIUDICE ARCHITECTS

Exterior perspective made by Erik Giudice Architects

Site plan 1:4000 made by Erik Giudice Architects

Conceptual diagram made by Erik Giudice Architects

Conceptual drawing made by Erik Giudice Architects

ONE OF THREE EQUAL FIRST PRIZES OF DKK 200,000

BRIAN VARGO, JONAS NIELSEN & MATHIAS PALLE

TEPLAN CREATIVE CHEMISTRY A FLEXIBLE CONCEPT e.g. 1. Budgetary Requirements...

BIKE PARKING Access

LIBRARY ARCHI-TEGN AUDITORIUM

INSTITUTE FOR (X) WORKSHOP

THE TOOL TOWERS STUDY LAB-SPACE:

SCAPE IN A PLAUSIBLE WAY. THE ARCHI-

THE A-LAB ENTRY DEFINITELY HAS THE

THE TOOL TOWERS STUDY

ONE OF THREE EQUAL FIRST PRIZES OF DKK 200,000

ATELIER LORENTZEN LANGKILDE

Exterior perspective made by Atelier Lorentzen Langkilde

Art and Architecture Wood house

Site plan 1:4000 made by Atelier Lorentzen Langkilde Stair

Open down Sound Light

Street Studio Terrace

Studio Terrace Loading workshops

Team meeting Team meeting

Team exhibition Archi Tegn Storage Printing

Reading niche Book stair