Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Contributed by
Robin Puett, MP
Barriers
Program evaluations require funding, time and technical skills: requirements that are often
perceived as diverting limited program resources from clients. Program staff are often
concerned that evaluation activities will inhibit timely accessibility to services or compromise
the safety of clients. Evaluation can necessitate alliances between historically separate
community groups (e.g. academia, advocacy groups, service providers; Short, Hennessy, &
Campbell, 1996). Mutual misperceptions regarding the goals and process of evaluation can
result in adverse attitudes (CDC, 1999; Chalk & King, 1998).
Overcoming Barriers
Types of Evaluation
Various types of evaluation can be used to assess different aspects or stages of program
development. As terminology and definitions of evaluation types are not uniform, an effort
has been made to briefly introduce a number of types here.
Context Evaluation Investigating how the program operates or will operate in a particular
social, political, physical and economic environment. This type of evaluation could include a
community needs or organizational assessment
(http://www.wkkf.org/Publications/evalhdbk/default.htm). Sample question: What are the
environmental barriers to accessing program services? Formative Evaluation Assessing
needs that a new program should fulfill (Short, Hennessy, & Campbell, 1996), examining the
early stages of a program's development (Rossi & Freeman, 1993), or testing a program on a
small scale before broad dissemination (Coyle, Boruch, & Turner, 1991). Sample question:
Who is the intended audience for the program? Process Evaluation Examining the
implementation and operation of program components. Sample question: Was the program
administered as planned? Impact Evaluation Investigating the magnitude of both positive
and negative changes produced by a program (Rossi & Freeman, 1993). Some evaluators
limit these changes to those occurring immediately (Green & Kreuter, 1991). Sample
question: Did participant knowledge change after attending the program? Outcome
Evaluation Assessing the short and long-term results of a program. Sample question: What
are the long-term positive effects of program participation? Performance or Program
Monitoring
Logic Models
Logic models are flowcharts that depict program components. These models can include any
number of program elements, showing the development of a program from theory to
activities and outcomes. Infrastructure, inputs, processes, and outputs are often included. The
process of developing logic models can serve to clarify program elements and expectations
for the stakeholders. By depicting the sequence and logic of inputs, processes and outputs,
logic models can help ensure that the necessary data are collected to make credible statements
of causality (CDC, 1999).
Recommendations
The National Research Council provides several recommendations for future violence
prevention program evaluations. Some of these recommendations include: continued and
expanded collaborations between evaluators/researchers and services providers, the use of
appropriate measures and outcomes, the development and implementation of evaluations that
address multiple services or multiple issues, and the allotment of resources to conduct quality
evaluations (Chalk & King, 1998).
References
Burt, M. R., Harrell, A. V., Newmark, L. C., Aron, L. Y., & Jacobs, L. K. (1997). Evaluation
guidebook: Projects funded by S.T.O.P. formula grants under the Violence Against Women
Act. The Urban Institute.http://www.urban.org/crime/evalguide.html
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1992). Handbook for evaluating HIV education.
Division of Adolescent and School Health, Atlanta.
CDC. Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR Recommendations and
Reports 1999;48(RR11):1-40.
Chalk, R., & King, P. A. (Eds.). (1998). Violence in Families: Assessing prevention and
treatment programs. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Coyle, S. L., Boruch, R. F., & Turner, C. F. (Eds.). (1991). Evaluating AIDS prevention
programs: Expanded edition. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Green, L.W., & Kreuter, M. W. (1991). Health promotion planning: An educational and
environmental approach (2nd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.
National Committee for Injury Prevention and Control. (1989). Injury prevention: Meeting
the challenge. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 5(Suppl. 3).
Rossi, P. H., & Freeman, H. E. (1993). Evaluation: A systematic approach (5th ed.). Newbury
Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Short, L., Hennessy, M., & Campbell, J. (1996). Tracking the work. In Family violence:
Building a coordinated community response: A guide for communities.